Disney Live-Action Remakes Are Making Me Insane
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- disney more like ew, gross, i don't like that stop it
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
intro and outro made by: / oicabie
edited by: Johnny Calderon ytimnothere@gmail.com
Patreon - / sajisharma
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
social medias
Instagram - @saji_sharma
Twitter - @versaji02
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
business inquiries
email - saji@sparkmedia.la
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
its so incredibly frustrating how people treat animated movies like nothing more than a story board for live-action remakes. It completely undermines the artistry and beauty that goes into animation as a medium.
i was recently thinking about how cool it would be if high fantasy books were animated in like a god of war style instead of live actions when they turn them into tv or movies. i think it would give a lot more room to make the world look true to the books
when i say god of war style i mean animation style not turning them into a video game
@@lol-lb5pm That‘s such a great idea!! makes me think of how incredibly disappointed 11 y/o me was when I watched the movie adaptation of Eragon. The most treassured book series of my childhood could‘ve been so much more :,)
@@VinceMDT i haven’t read that series but im sure it’s great tho!
this is literally my favourite comment on why the medium of animation is constantly battling with these soulless remakes. I wish animation was more appreciated because the storytelling and art that goes into it is so incredible, yet so undervalued in the film industry. Animation is a medium that offers so much, it shouldn’t be treated as lesser in comparison to live-action remakes.
I refuse to call the new lion king live action. Its literally animated. Making something look realistic doesn't make it less animated.
Exactly.😑
Thank you!! CGI is still animation, Christ.
👏realistic👏animation👏is👏still👏animation👏
This!!! I say Lion King Remake whenever I talk about it!!
REAL. YES. THANK YOU.
Moana isn't even that old. Soon they'll be releasing the animated movies and live action remakes at the same time
I'm starting to think they might do that
nah cause we're gonna be able to choose between 2 movies soon😭
I know right, Disney just want some quick money. It's Insult to the original moana.
That might actually be the only thing that puts to bed the live-action remakes. Disney would then see that the 'live-action' movie made half what the animated counterpart did and stop. Can I also take the chance to complain about 'live-action' as a term... EVERYTHING in Lion King was CG... every 3rd character in Pinocchio was CG, and 1/4th the characters in Bayformers are CG, where's the line?
What's weird to me is the older films like Snow White and Sleeping Beauty that potentially could use an update, but they're going with 90s films and much more recent for some reason?
Imagine if any other company was making live action adaptations of cartoons like, imagine how weird a live action Bojack Horseman would be 💀💀
There was an April Fools joke that Paramount+ was doing a live action CatDog 😂
That would be so cursed
This is unrelated but Saji’s music intro sounds/transitions sounds like they’re from Bojack Horseman lol
@@melanieschwarz2181 i have always thought that i wonder if that’s their intention
I could fit a ben afflick in the horse suit.
I never once looked at Frozen and thought
"Wow I sure wish I saw this with real people!"
Animation can be used as a way to escape reality for some people (*cough* me) so seeing actors I recognize and real people just kinda ruins it
Edit: I called it.
REAL!!!! its like how i hate seeing voice actors after seeing their animated form 😭
So
@@jelliekitty righttt it feels weird seeing uh let's say Anna's VA kiss some random guy. Now I can't stop thinking about Anna kissing some random guy
Oh God, if they make a live action Frozen.😨
@@Nunyah-Arbys don't give them ideas😭
Another thing that needs to be addressed is the way using celebrities to voice characters damages the field for professional voice actors by reducing the available roles and creating an artificial wage gap, among other things. The public ends up losing out as well by being provided with lower quality performances just so studios can ride on the use of a big name.
I love voice actors more than normal actors, they can do so much with just their voice and it’s incredible how many of them can completely change how they sound. I HATE when an animated movie’s cast is just a ton of celebrities.. There are so many AMAZING voice actors that could be so good in these big animated movies.. But no it’s big name Hollywood celebrities.. Like I get one or two to promote the movie but nowadays it seems to be only celebs..
Like for example the Mario movie with Crisp Rat (who seems to be voicing everything now and hate it) he didn’t fit the role at all.
(Jack Black as Bowser was amazing though and the only good part of the movie)
THIS!!! it pisses me off so much. voice acting is such an under appreciated talent and it can really make or break a film. they would rather have a low quality performance from a big name than a high quality performance from a REAL TALENTED VOICE ACTOR. I hate this new trend I hate it I hate it I hate it. its so hard for me to enjoy a film when the voice acting is so bland and and lifeless like most celebrities give. or when it doesnt fit.
I never cared about celebrity voice acting. Listen to the old Disney films, their voices where so unique and beautiful.
This. I’m so fucking sick of voice actors not being appreciated enough.
Never mind the fact that a lot of the casting now is being done for the sake of ““ diversity, and then basically saying to heck with talent.
my theatre teacher has a conspiracy theory that disney is going to take over the world by exploiting people's nostalgia.. these movies make that feel more realistic, tbh
Yeah, knowing Disney your theater teachers probably not wrong unfortunately
Exploring nostalgia and its relation to trauma is an important theme during civil unrest the correlation can be found in nope the movie and swarm
Moana isn’t even old enough to be nostalgic 💀
@@KingOfGaymes You are remedial
the head of Disney literally thinks adults don’t watch animation so he’s just turning all the movies people loved ‘as kids’ into ‘adult movies’
I think people should just... stop. Just stop making live-action remakes altogether. It might just be the last thing we need to solve every crisis going on in the world right now, who knows.
No they don’t:)
A lot of us think that, does Disney care is the question.
@@roloboog Simple no no they don’t.
"imagine all the people
living without live action remakes
ooohh"
It was the Lilo and Stitch live-action announcement that BROKE me. Also I will scream if anymore Star Wars shows come out.
FACTS. the star wars shows keep getting more nonsensical.
Andor is great tho
Best part is it’s “live action” even tho it’s half (or mostly) cgi…like that’s still animation just more expensive and less expressive lmao
all the characters lose their personality and become soulless without the exaggerated proportions (cough cough MAUI cough cough)
As much as I love Moana, because as an Islander it’s a character I’ve related too because of its dive into how the islands moved etc, I feel like the one movie in itself was not enough to get aspects from all islands. I feel like instead of a live action they could make a sequel where she visits different islands to trade resources, like they did back then, and meet new countries as well as famous myths and legends each island has, like Te Fiti who is based on (or speculated to be) Pele the goddess of fire, wind, lighting and volcanoes. Instead, making a live action actually may take away the films entire values of each island they tried to shove into one movie and base it on Dwayne’s cultural heritage, being Samoan, as well as Auli’i’s cultural heritage, being Hawaiian, which will probably, and most likely, be the only two cultures focused within the actual movie, which as someone who has looked to this movie as comfort and very much related to it, it’s kind of insulting.
This is what we would actually want to watch so Disney can'r do that.
Exactly! I think it could also be fun seeing a spin off with Maui since he does have plenty of legends that would be better than making a plain live action.
@@zaziaza A Maui show/movie would be frickin amazing.
this is actually a really good point, I feel like in an earlier "era" of disney the obvious next step would be a sequel! The fact that they're """remaking""" a movie that's not even a decade old, instead of bringing new ideas to the universe they already established, is honestly just such a strange move from an artistic standpoint, and that just makes it more glaringly obvious that it's a soulless cash grab.
They’re making a Moana tv series, so u might get what you want
I'm so tired of live action Disney movies. I had to watch the one for Mulan for my Mythology course (we watched both versions of the Disney movies) and man that was painful. I thought everyone was being dramatic on it being that bad but somehow it felt like an understatement
I have a question, why Mulan? Like is there not other movies? Like Percy Jackson , Hercules etc. I’m not being mean but like is there a specific reason to watch the Milan movies?
yeah i agree w daij, mulan was a weird asf choice considering tons of chinese ppl have said the mythology is completely inaccurate to actual chinese culture. like the way chi works is bullshit, theres nothing like the mulan witch in chinese mythology, the phoenix rising from the ashes is a purely european thing etc
@@Mars-dw2zc Mulan 2020 was the worst remake I ever saw, I would rather watch The Lion King 2019 instead. Because at least the lion king has STAKES and it's at least okay (sort of), meanwhile Mulan 2020, has no stakes or a reason to care about the protagonist at ALL. It's awful, it's boring, it's agonizing. 🤬😡
Also, the fact that Disney ia creatively bankrupt by making animated sequels, woke movies, and bad remakes is just laughingly terrible. Meanwhile other studios like universal, dreamworks, and even illumination are dominating the theaters.
@@Plaaygaldai I thought (and still do) that Mulan was a good candidate for live action, as long as it was an adaptation of the folk story and not a remake of the Disney movie.
@@GrandArchPriestOfTheAlgorithm Same. Apparently I expected too much from them, a Mulan remake could've been incredible if it had just made the effort to be something a little more than the original movie, done with care. Somehow they made it so MUCH WORSE with the changes that they did make, it's a shame.
See, I was playing along with the therapist role-play, but I couldn't continue after hearing "Disney" because I get it, I would agree. Like, say no more, Saji. I too feel this way. I would just agree and man, it would be us backing forthing at this point of yEAH WHAT IS WITH IS?? I hate this corporation lmao
Therapist immersion broken due to hatred of evil corporation
the rock is speedrunning being hated as much as chris pratt
The rock is so in love with himself he thinks we all love him as much as he does.
I actually like Chris Pratt, but I agree, he is overused
I am completely convinced that Disney is going to make a live action of every popular animated movie they have.
Me: *eyeballs Song of the South* 😒😬
I dread the day they make a live action of Wreck It Ralph 😬
Live action Onward would be unsettling af
Animated remakes of live action remakes of animated films.
even though the majority of them have gotten mixed to negative reviews (as far as I've seen)
I hear you all, but also, Maleficent and Cinderella are absolute gems.
Maleficent was so good and I think Disney is just constantly trying to recreate it but you can tell that the people that made Maleficent actually cared about it, like it was definitely a cash grab but a cash grab created with purpose and love
So true, they're the only ones that kept the whimsy and fairytale feel
The Maleficent and Cinderella reboot was atleast trying to do something original with its live action counterpart by adding extra details that doesn't break the immersion of the animated story
Cruella was really good too. And it was a different movie. It wasn’t a shot for shot remake. Same with Maleficent. It they did that it would be much better. God forbid they actually go into the writers room and create anything new.
i’m glad you’re talking about this because i’ve been thinking to myself how sick it makes me that there’s not really any new movies coming out, there’s just overdone reboots of animated movies that were already fine in the first place! (with the exception of some of the misogyny and racism in these old animated movies…)
also, i love this video thank you for making it ❤
There are tons of new movies coming out...
@@piersnivans5983 i know, i misspoke, i just feel like there are plenty of disney movies coming out that have been remade into live action movies
@@piersnivans5983 Correction: There are tons of shitty new movies coming out.
the fact red reflects off the playbutton.. is genius.
Just to add to your feelings for Mr. (not a) Rock. He has it stated in his contract that his character cannot lose any fights in his films.
Lmfao no wonder Vin Diesel hates the guy’s guts.
I think part of the reason that he says it’s in the spirit of his grandfather is that they based a lot of Maui’s character on his grandfather, however I don’t think it’s really that necessary to make a live action version
I think it’s more the they want both the rock and Aulii to portray these characters and time is ticking for both of them.
@@JuQui228 yeah I can understand that
I mean they are about as "live action" as Avatar is "live action". They are hyper-realistic animated features. But because you get to see the pores and fur on every animal, and there are actually two people who are shot against a green screen, they are called "live action"
The guy in Moana has no nipples and they often zoom on his body. I can't imagine how gringe a zoom on The Rock's nipples would feel on a huge screen.
Lol true and knowing how bad some cgi these days is, the tattoos moving will look like shit too. Also can you tattoo on nipples?
Saji, you breaking into my house just to feel in control has made me feel very unsafe and uncomfortable
this. so glad someone is speaking up about this
and they also just announced the lilo and stitch movie, and that's a whole colrism casting mess, like please just stop it
I will say the remakes have made me appreciate how amazing those original scripts were. The original Aladdin didn't waste a single frame. The live action script was a hot mess, on the other hand.
my main problem with Mulan live action was Mulan her self. in the animated movie she was a normal person with problems and no martial arts background. she is a screw up but she still does her best to honor her family. in the live action she is freaking Bruce Jesus Lee. how?!?!?!
The only Disney live action remake I like is the 1996 version of "101 Dalmatians". I like how it's different but not too different, has real animals that are adorable and don't talk, and Jasper is played by Hugh Laurie (my first crush).
I screamed when I saw the thumbnail, and it wasn't the good kind of "I can't believe this is happening. This is amazing." more like the "Why are you doing this to us, Disney? Don't we suffer enough already?" Great video, and it was good therapy as well. Thank you
I also think it’s great that a new generation of little girls can see themselves in Ariel. That’s the only live remake that I give any props too. But it kind of ends there. To me anyway, aaaallll the Disney remakes have been flops. Just awful. I feel like the closest, for me, was Aladdin. But it still missed the mark. And a lot of them just look leached of color, charm and any real love. Just cash grabs. Bleeeeep.
Yeah and even then, they could’ve just made a new mermaid movie with poc as leads!
Cinderela was very good and the beauty and the beast was ok.
The Lion King was also good.
That is narcissic af! And exclusive to the world fans of original kids and adults!
did you see the stuff about live action lilo and stitch? the whitewashing is CRAZY when lilo and nani being outwardly indigenous is an intentional and core aspect of their characters. there was an even a deleted scene where mainlanders are harassing lilo about where to find the beach and saying random hawaiian phrases just because they can tell she is indigenous. making her, nani's and david's actors almost white passing is wild.
But blackwashing is ok! What Disney did with Ariel is huge crime against og mermaid fans just some little girls can see thenseve and relate! Maybe they did same to Lilo. They are fictional characters too!
maui in the thumbnail looks so goofy
He probably walked into Disney corporate the same way he did with DC (and failed) and threatened them to make this for him
I just found out that they plan to make a live-action Lilo & Stitch movie, and Stitch will be CGI. In conjunction with Disney's decision, I will be moving to the Swiss Alps before the release of the trailers.
a bit off topic but ive heard before that animation is a way for artists to convey what it feels to be alive, and now we have real life adaptations that just. don’t give any emotions at all
feels like a vehicle for the rock, i wouldnt be suprised if it was his idea
especially since he's not being hired/ featured as much because almost ALL his movies starring him bomb!
A remake of lilo and stitch is so stupid. Stitch will never look good in cgi or whatever they'll use. He's a creepy creature in anything other than the stylized animation they originally used.
Never have I seen a video that reflected my thoughts on the whole LiVe AcTiOn ReMaKe situation as directly as this one (including your opening rant). I'm an animator, and to see the biggest animation company in the world disregard and disrespect the art form like this hurts
i have a feeling disney is gonna give up on animation the same way they stopped doing 2d animation
I'm convinced Disney has never had an original idea, not even the princesses were original. My whole childhood was robbed from a book. And they just had to milk the life from Cinderella
That’s actually 100% true
YOU KNOW ITS GUNNA BE A GOOD DAY WHEN SAJI POSTS
Disney is garbage now. All of their content is clearly about quantity and not quality anymore. I don’t even like most of the newer animated princess movies because I don’t think they’re as good as the classics. Frozen is the worst. I hate that movie with all of my heart and soul.
oh good! i sometimes feel I'm the only one who hated Frozen! why are people so obsessed with that movie?!?
@@nihilismistheonlyway4680 Idk as kid I didn’t question it that much and was only like „hehe look a snowman💀“, but yeah, now it‘s weird. Especially the twist-villain thing with Hans… It doesn’t make sense at all
Hot take: the rock shouldn't play Maui in a live action. As a Polynesian, Maui is such a significant figure across our differenr cultures, and the rock doesn't feel like he's doing justice to the legends of Maui. He just feels too goofy and whitewashed to fit the role. Also whenever there's a Polynesian role in any Hollywood movie, the rock is always the default actor to fill that space. Like where's the diversity??? I know he's not the only talented Polynesian actor in the world. It just feels like Hollywood went with the most basic option. At this point I can't take him seriously when he gives his whole "representing the culture " speel. It doesn't feel authentic. More like a way to maintain popularity amongst the poly audience. Polynesian does not always have to equal the rock. Anyways, kiko pau.
Really off topic but, is it just me or is the light green book on the shelf the first book in the Heroes of Olympus series by Rick Riordan?
That does look identical to the spine of my copy of the lost hero, so probably! Good eye, dude damn.
Yeah that looks like The Lost Hero
Animation has my heart thinking about how all these people gathered around to make a movie. One of my favorite behind the scenes of an animated movie was Bambi when they gathered their team to do deer studies with a live deer :)
literally me walking into a therapy session with a full understanding of my problem
When i first saw the live action little mermaid trailer, i was surprised that they decided to just turn off the lights and film. Every. Single. Thing. Was so freaking dark. Sure, the original little mermaid had a lot of blue tones to things, but they were lighter blues in most cases. You could see the characters and they stood out against the background and there was a lot of vibrant color. Just have the ocean as colorful and bright as in finding nemo and i'd be all for it.
As it is, if you don't watch the movie in pitch blackness, you're not going to get to see anything. And that makes for an awful movie experience. I can only hope that they actually light the actress in a way that doesn't make her invisible against the dark background.
It's like dressing someone in sand colors and filming them from a huge distance in the desert. It's just bad movie making if you intend for anything to be seen
You should check out the featurette and other teasers they’ve posted on TH-cam! They feature a lot more scenes with a lot more vibrant colors. Let’s not judge a film based on just a few clips of a trailer…let’s analyze it in whole.
However, I see where you’re coming from. In post production, natural lighting in film will have a gray tone, as that’s how we see it in real life. Because this is a live action movie, the programs they’re using emulate natural lighting above and below water. Unfortunately, these mediums (air and water) will cast gray tones on the world around them. You can observe this with ALL live actions Disney has done, and the little mermaid is not exempt from that. Realistic lighting programs are not going to be the same as flat animated colors, and maybe that’s the issue at hand.
I think that is to resemble a painting,if you see the poster,you will understand,this is underwater,some places underwater,would not have many light.
The movie looks more realistic.
Tere is scene where things are colorful.
While i agree with you guys that the intent was for realism, people don't like realistic movies.
For example, if you were to punch someone, it wouldn't sound the same as in a movie. Yt has a number of videos on foley artists and what they use instead of the real sound. Movies that use actual punching sounds feel weird because of this.
Movies used to film in daylight then color it blue to signify night while still letting you see the movie. Theater does this, too.
Good filmmakers add extra light to actors so their face is lit more evenly (i think they're called softlights and bouncelights) to prevent things like harsh shadows and bags around the eyes.
It used to be in movies that actors had to project to be picked up by mics, but nowadays many actors are mic'd so well they basically just whisper on set. Talking very low or whispering comes across really differently tonally than speaking at a normal volume, but movie goers don't seem to want to listen to that.
In the kiss the girl scene, ariel is very difficult to see against the background. It's just very dark in general. It's realistic that you can't see well in the dead of night, but that doesn't make for a good movie, just saying. Her hair is also much more brown than stark red, which i saw in the teaser and assumed meant they were dulling colors underwater since certain wavelengths can't be seen. So if we're a number of meters below the water (ie at the bottom of the ocean) since red the color is lost by 5 meters. So the blue scaling of the underwater scenes in the teaser make less sense when the official trailer (which i just glanced at) has the under the sea song very vibrant and colorful at the same depth as everything just being blue and dull.
@@catelynh1020 You should do further research on these scenes. Please watch the one minute featurette Disney put out on TH-cam, and you will see your points are contradictory. For example, the Kiss the Girl scene has bioluminescent ocean. Also, the Ursula’s grotto scenes make use of great red-blue color contrast. There’s a jellyfish scene with glowing jellyfish. There’s multiple clips of her swimming through a vibrant sea.
We can’t assume everything just on a few clips. If you don’t want to watch the movie, great, but don’t flat out exaggerate. It’s not in good faith.
@@mcclancait
You are correct that i had yet to see the ursula reveal cuz, ya know, i don't get ads since i want to have downloaded videos for the road. I also have no idea when featurettes became a thing, but i could only find one and it did not include bioluminescence in the water for the kiss the girl frames so maybe there's another one that i missed. There was some light in the trees but it was minimal and eric/k's face was a lot more lit than hers. In order to see her face more clearly i had to turn off my overhead lights and turn up my phone brightness.
You also have to admit that half a year can have great changes done to cgi in a film. Just look back at what sonic used to look like before they changed his design for the movie. Just thinking of his old face still unnerves me.
Disney saying "we're doing this for realism" then doing nothing realistic is about par for the course. The teaser trailer i saw half a year ago had mostly muted colors for "realism" but the month old official trailer really said "of course you can see the full color spectrum at the bottom of the ocean". This is the same thing they did for mulan. They took out the most realistic thing of people singing/chanting in the army and replaced it with straight up magic.
If i can find it, there's a good video about cinematography and how movies keep getting darker and darker because they're made to be seen in a dark environment of a movie theater. And because dark and gritty is in.
You can experience a bit of how it's meant to be by watching the trailer on a large tv hours after sunset with the lights all off in your house so the only light is coming from the tv and maybe your phone in your hand. But i still think it's too dark.
As a good reference point, watch the trailers for the harry potter movies. As they got more gritty towards the end, they got darker in their lighting. Whichever one i just brought up to look at, shots of voldie's army were very much on the dark side, but even at night time there was plenty of light on the characters (probably a magic light source they were all looking up at, i dunno, i never finished watching the series).
If you look at the trailer for greatest showman, the dance on the rooftop at night is fully lit and visible. _That_ is what is missing in these disney remakes; they got rid of the light and color. And lost the plot, but that's a whole other argument. I'm still shocked at what they did to Pinocchio.
i came here after hearing about the new live action lilo and stitch. the actress plyong nani isnt even hawaiian shes filipina 😀
lol you know most of them whities are truly confused and asking "wait!! there's a difference?!?!"
Re making a movie that is 6 years old is what really gets me on my nerves!!!!
My only problem with the live-action-remakes is that they don’t put effort into finding people that actually look similar to the animated characters
Just picked my major and it is psychology so that did go to my heart and my heart so thank you saji
My grandma walked in and asked how I'm doing a video call on the TV during the therapist part lmao 😭😭
My biggest thing is, why make a live action remake when you can put that big budget into making an actual good continuation story instead? Expanding on it rather than recycling it frame for frame in a different medium, removing the original soul from it?
that caption makes me feel like if you haven't done a collab with Jordan Adika already, you REALLY should
Gawd , your hair… it’s… it’s beautiful!😊
Honestly the rock as Maui is the perfect actor for the role lmao
I once saw a commenter say that they wished Coraline was made into a live-action, other live action request never really struck a nerve since I couldn't care less about them, I just don't watch them, but that one really infuriated me. Coraline being a stop-motion is mostly the reason why it's so amazing, there is literally nothing a live-action could bring to the movie that would make it worth watching.
To bring in such a magic revolving movie and try to recreate it in "reality standards" to me is an insult to the original creators of the movie. If you tell me the movie or series you liked was lacking in plot or something, and you want to see those plot holes be filled I'd get it, idk why that would be necessary through a live-action but I'd understand the reasoning, but to take a perfectly fine masterpiece and want to see real humans be in it just for giggles makes me so unnaturally infuriated. It's so sad that still today animation is seen as a silly childish genre instead of simply a different, more magical outside the box method of bringing something to life.
my dad always says he looks just like the rock... hes an old white italian man
Nice to meet you.
I just did the whole bit...The bill is in the mail.
Lol if I really were your therapist I'd have been like "say no more, i got you' and pulled out the molotov cocktails.
I already see them making a Enchanto remake 😭😭 pls Disney let animators breathe
The rock always reaping his Samoan heritage hard but acts like his black side doesn't exist, that's what really makes me not like this dude.
Moana came out less than 10 years ago. I thought the point of remakes was to re-introduce classics to a new generation oh wait no it's just about money.
I don't like live action re-makes because they're basically copies, and I'd rather watch the original. If they want something live action, either mix the original story up, or be creative and come up with something new.
DISNEY ALREADY HAS LIVE ACTION VERSIONS THEYRE CALLED STAGE MUSICAL ADAPTATIONS
DISNEY SHOULD RECORD JUST RECORD THEIR MUSICALS AND PUT THEM ON DISNEY PLUS!!!
The animated Beauty and the Beast won best picture at the academy awards 1992. I think they changed it to where it animated movies were their own category in like 2002? It sucks because like you said now they can't win best picture or maybe they technically can, but they won't...
The live action remakes were cool at first, like with Maleficent and and Cinderella because at least they changed the story up a bit but now they’re just copying the story with basically no change it’s the most pointless kind of movie to exist
They better cast polynesians i swear
ive been watching these live-action remark discussion videos on my school chromebook, the ones that arent racist or bigoted for reasons obviously. just the unrestricted ones.😀
Not every animated movie needs to be live action :)
None of them need to be made into a live action version. Cartoons are not supposed to be live action you lose too much of the story when you convert it over
ew, gross, i don't like that stop it
I just saw an ad on a separate video and it was for disney live action peta pan then i looked up disney live action remakes then i saw this and clicked on it
You just accurately described why most people have a problem with race swapping characters and called them racists.
The term gets thrown around so much, people are going to get numb to it. It’s like a catch all insult for people you don’t like. If I’m going to be called racist for think black characters deserve their own stories told and not hand me down from safe, bankable European tales, so be it. Our people have their own great stories, not just from Africa but myths and legends born right here in America. But they will never get told because Hollywood reincforces the idea that audiences only want proven “white” stories.
Like the term woke.
It's a black American slang that simply means to be aware or alert but nowadays it has lost its meaning.
Also that Cleopatra from Netflix... Bruh
@@wrestlinganime4life288 They put a white actress and people said that was whitewashing,they do what people on Twitter wanted,and now suddenly they want a white actress.
We REALLY don’t want hand-me downs. I’m only going hard for the little mermaid because Halle reminds me of one due to her voice and features, but Disney really tries it thinking we want black characters to fill in already existing non-black characters. No Disney! We want our own characters, our own stories, our own everything.
sunday saji video hooray!!
Loved the video! And it was funny to have Chris from 3C Films in that TH-cam short you watched at the end. I love that guy’s channel as well.
freestyle at the end went hard
Thanks jack
I read this comment before I heard the freestyle and was very confused. Now I get it 😂
Thank you so much for this video, you did a great job at going over all the points made against this live-action obsession 👌 what a way for me to find out that Moana is next !
the more i rewatch the announcement of the live action, the more i can tell the rock is being held at gunpoint.
I love that the rubber plant in the back still has the tag in it 😂😂
Animation consistently has better storytelling than live action movies!! I really liked the retelling of Snow White with K Stew and the sequel, that they tried to make it seem like it was prequel, was good too! Do that Disney!!
These live action remakes are going to be the death of me :D
just gotta say this video was incredibly well done, recognize the work you're putting in, you go, saji! hope you have an amazing day!
Casually throws in an Grammy-worthy freestyle at the end
This is completely unrelated but is the rock gonna wear a wig?!? since Maui has long hair...😰😰😰😭😭💀💀 not that there's anything wrong with wigs its just gonna be goofy bc we're used to seeing him bald
Can’t wait for the live-action remake of Encanto next year 🙄
Was half asleep and thought I was watching Jarvis Johnson.
If they touch tangled or the emperors new grove, ima use that as my 13th reason why
No live action remake will ever capture the charm you get from animation.
u always have really creative intros i love it
When u knocked I said, "come in!"
Great now I'm gonna need prewritten subtitles to have a conversation with people now
Crazy to see how Disney really used animation as a tool for success for decades and now just show so much hatred towards the craft with all those live action remakes. I mean they always were horrible but this is insane how it just confirms even more through the years.
For mulan it goes from happy all sing and music then when they hit the war scene it switches tone to the reality of war and u can see it and it makes u feel it , in the live action the war scene Feels quickly swept as it goes from serous to serous to happyness ?
( the only thing I like is mulan didn’t cut her hair yes it’s iconic but men didn’t cut there hair either )
Thank you for the sick freestyle at the end
But jungle book was actually really good- I might be biased because it’s the only Disney I enjoy
You have the right to enjoy it, but it was an objectively bad movie. The only reason it got praise was because of the visuals and the manipulative writing.
Lol like imagine if studio ghibli did a live action remake
the rock is unfortunately in his villain arch
I love the new outro great work
I wouldn't be as upset if they weren't under the disney name because they probably would be able to have more creative freedom because as much as Disney pretends that that it isn't fairy tales are under the public domain and they just hold the most well known version of the tale. Like it would probably cost less if they put they put their already made animated movies on the big screen again. I remember going to see the animated Beauty and the Beast in the theater when it was re-released because I wasn't born around the first time it came around.
the therapist roleplay😭😭 why was that so fun