And if you are pregnant, it becomes dangerous to travel to these states that ban abortion because if you need emergency care, you may not be able to access it.
@@gregpresley1466 You do realize that a woman can die from hemorrhage from miscarriage, right? And then there's eclampsia and gestational diabetes. So yes, women most definitely can be in serious danger and die from pregnancy. It's not a lie, and now you know it.
Mandatory vasectomies is a very viable concept..... In terms of the big picture: 1. Stops unchosen pregnancy 2. Stops mental and physical life long scars on female children from unchosen pregnancy. 3. Stops young men from being held accountable to 18 years of child support by an unchosen pregnancy. 4. Stops fathers from going to jail for failure to make support payments. 5. Removes the need for social programs. Which, in my opinion will, over time, result in every single child being a chosen child and the return of the family unit with fathers in the home to raise their children and to give their sons a hands on role model. Or....... you know, the government can give women's bodies back. ❤️✌️💋
Absolutely! And if/when the man finds a woman willing to bear his child(ren), vasectomies can generally be reversed. With her signed consent, of course.
You have about as much chance for a Mandatory vasectomies law being passed about as much chance as a 2 year old being elected president of the United States.. What's the point of saying something so dumb?
@@e-man1634 Yet, the _vast_ majority of anti-choicers are _exactly_ that dumb, if not more dumb. Their entire "argument" is that pregnant women should be legally forced to give birth against their will. I _agree_ with you. Anti-choicers saying that women should be legally forced to give birth without their consent is supremely _dumb._ You're right. As you're saying, why is this even still a "debate?" Just because anti-choicers are dumb and uneducated doesn't mean women shouldn't have any rights.
"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries." ---James Madison, Founding Father, architect of the Constitution, and fourth President of the United States.
"Separation of church and state" isn't found in the Constitution. Nonetheless, the concept was to keep government out of religion, not to keep people of faith out of government. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.".....John Adams, Founding Father, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and second President of the United States.
@@kahanakahuna1470 People of faith can serve in public office-although Thomas Jefferson proposed otherwise. Those people just cannot use legislation to force others to comply with their religious beliefs.
@@gregpresley1466 Republican would take the country in REVERSE!!. Roe v Wade 50 back in time. Trump's plans yo be a dictator back 250 years. Vote BLUE to drive forward. 💙
Lots of women are ordering misoprostol from abroad. Also, miscarriages can be induced safely (but inadvisedly!) via supplements available at any drugstore. An early abortion (the vast majority) are indistinguishable from miscarriages, and nobody has to give medical staff any particular details, and nobody should ever talk to the police without an attorney. None of this is ideal, of course.
6 week ban is a cop out. Either you are against abortion or you are not. A fetus is a potential person at conception, so if you are anti abortion the 6 week ban is hypocritical I can see rescue missions happening for these women with people volunteering to take legs of a car ride to get them someplace for an abortion. .It's what they do in animal rescue. I also believe people will find them a free place to stay.
But get this: if you really want to create a situation of women getting abortions just in case for "birth control," that's what 6 weeks does. Congratulations, woman-haters.
Firstly, the 6-week ban is a complete ban. They are just pretending by throwing a very small bone to women. Secondly, there is a reason why one might want to put in restrictions, but it has nothing to do with what the Republican legislatures are saying. A fetus is assaulting in order to live. It has stolen an organ. No other human being has this right. For some reason, anti-abortion people think fetuses do. I do not understand it since they are claiming they want to pass fetal personhood bills. Apparently, it only gives privileges and ignores disabilities. I, on the other hand, think the fetus should enjoy all the privileges and disabilities of being a person or human. One of those privileges is once someone has helped me to live through CPR is that I get rights that they not injure me through gross incompetence. If the person doesn't give me CPR, I don't have a right to demand they do so. The time period is simply when we assume the woman decided to be a mother, and it has nothing to do with how likely the fetus is to become a baby.
I *ONE HUNDRED PERCENT* agree with your entire statement above!!! ...A 6 week ban is hypocitical for any Pro Life advocate. There needs to be a FEDERAL LAW against all abortions!!!!!!
Imagine if, just like the abortion debate, we taught people how to not get diabetes (or pregnant) in the first place... Imagine if you will, a world where people actually took personal responsibility for their actions...
@@alexwyatt2911 ohh you want to talk about the 5%, not the 95%? You think the minority example is more pertinent to the example at hand? I guess you're right it fits...95% of abortions are elective and less than 5% are for medical reasons. It checks out. Irresponsible people make poor decisions and ruin it for the small minority that actually have problems.
People are also leaving MS and LA. CA (and to a lesser extent NY) are victims of their own success. They rank very well on the Human Development Index (measures of well-being), although not as well as New England. They've become very expensive as a result. CA's damned NIMBYs have done so much to prevent housing construction; it's infuriating. The lesson here is that neoliberal capitalist parties are unable to address these human needs.
"it's just a clump of cells", until decided by the mom/state human? 42 weeks in utero, just a clump of cells...just born? well, let's make you comfortable while your mother and the doctor decide if you are "just a clump of cells" or human (gov northam of Virginia said it and the defense was "he didn't say that" AFTER he was quoted, now it's that didn't happen AFTER you show the video). ya'll are asking for a dark place.
It is terrible. How will tax accountants and tax advisers survive if capital gains are taxed at the same rates as income. As for tax on unrealised gains it only applies to assets which have not been taxed for 90+ years so that would be at least 3 generations of tax exempt asset holdings - unlikely to be an issue for the vast majority of people and I am someone who is strongly against the concept of taxing unrealised gains because history shows that type of wealth tax is nearly always counterproductive
And yet, here you are. Also, regarding the source of your username, Orwell was a socialist and an Antifa icon, who survived a bullet through the throat battling against Franco's fascists in Spain.
@@scottcharney1091 I voted for Bernie twice. The dems rigged two primaries against him. Orwell would likely be a third party guy and you would calling him a Russian
My dear Jody, the word "woman" does imply somebody who is female, human and (almost) adult, some pregnant persons have only the first two qualities. Some pregnant persons are GIRLS, not women yet.
BECAUSE GIRL CHILDREN CAN BE PREGNANT. Of are you comfortable with calling a 10-year-old a “woman”? The kid’# frontal lobe of the brain isn’t even fully developed.
@@billplaney2585 it's hard to care about deleting your unborn child when you are homeless in a blue city with a needle hanging out of your arm. Abortion really is an elitist upper middle class white grrrll fight. Actual people have bigger problems right now.
@@beefree5215 An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy and reproductive healthcare includes Pap smears, fertility testing, contraception prescriptions/insertions, HRT, vasectomies, abortion, prenatal care, perinatal care, STI/STD screening & treatment, hysterectomies, tubal ligation, uterine ablation, testicular cancer screening, erectile dysfunction treatment, and a million other things. Are you sincerely unaware that people’s reproductive organs frequently require healthcare? What did you think obstetrics and gynecology were??
And if you are pregnant, it becomes dangerous to travel to these states that ban abortion because if you need emergency care, you may not be able to access it.
That's a lie, and you know it. The only one in danger is the baby.
@@gregpresley1466 You do realize that a woman can die from hemorrhage from miscarriage, right? And then there's eclampsia and gestational diabetes. So yes, women most definitely can be in serious danger and die from pregnancy. It's not a lie, and now you know it.
Mandatory vasectomies is a very viable concept.....
In terms of the big picture:
1. Stops unchosen pregnancy
2. Stops mental and physical life long scars on female children from unchosen pregnancy.
3. Stops young men from being held accountable to 18 years of child support by an unchosen pregnancy.
4. Stops fathers from going to jail for failure to make support payments.
5. Removes the need for social programs.
Which, in my opinion will, over time, result in every single child being a chosen child and the return of the family unit with fathers in the home to raise their children and to give their sons a hands on role model.
Or....... you know, the government can give women's bodies back.
❤️✌️💋
Yesssss!!!! Said so well @kristinajackson9606
Absolutely! And if/when the man finds a woman willing to bear his child(ren), vasectomies can generally be reversed. With her signed consent, of course.
You have about as much chance for a Mandatory vasectomies law being passed about as much chance as a 2 year old being elected president of the United States.. What's the point of saying something so dumb?
@@e-man1634 Yet, the _vast_ majority of anti-choicers are _exactly_ that dumb, if not more dumb. Their entire "argument" is that pregnant women should be legally forced to give birth against their will.
I _agree_ with you. Anti-choicers saying that women should be legally forced to give birth without their consent is supremely _dumb._ You're right. As you're saying, why is this even still a "debate?"
Just because anti-choicers are dumb and uneducated doesn't mean women shouldn't have any rights.
@@anniejuan1817are you crazy
"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries."
---James Madison, Founding Father, architect of the Constitution, and fourth President of the United States.
I think abortion itself soaks the soil of America.
It's not a matter of religion. It has been resoundingly decided by all civilized societies that killing is wrong.
@@brentharrington9235 So you want people to stop killing plants and animals? What are we gonna eat?
"Separation of church and state" isn't found in the Constitution. Nonetheless, the concept was to keep government out of religion, not to keep people of faith out of government. "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.".....John Adams, Founding Father, signer of the Declaration of Independence, and second President of the United States.
@@kahanakahuna1470 People of faith can serve in public office-although Thomas Jefferson proposed otherwise. Those people just cannot use legislation to force others to comply with their religious beliefs.
Everyone needs to get out and Vote!
We will, for Trump!
To avoid unwanted presidency, take the blue pill!
That's right!!!! ...Vote Red!!!!♥♥♥♥♥ ...Save our future children!!!!
@@gregpresley1466 Republican would take the country in REVERSE!!. Roe v Wade 50 back in time. Trump's plans yo be a dictator back 250 years. Vote BLUE to drive forward. 💙
@hexl702too5 Trump has detailed plans to end democracy, but not one plan to help everyday Americans! .
Lots of women are ordering misoprostol from abroad. Also, miscarriages can be induced safely (but inadvisedly!) via supplements available at any drugstore. An early abortion (the vast majority) are indistinguishable from miscarriages, and nobody has to give medical staff any particular details, and nobody should ever talk to the police without an attorney.
None of this is ideal, of course.
You’re the best of MSNBC!
Lol...your pretty stupid
Best at what
If THAT's their BEST, ick. No wonder decent people stay away from MSNBC.
Trump for prison 2024 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Please, don't attack Donald Grump!
6 week ban is a cop out. Either you are against abortion or you are not. A fetus is a potential person at conception, so if you are anti abortion the 6 week ban is hypocritical I can see rescue missions happening for these women with people volunteering to take legs of a car ride to get them someplace for an abortion. .It's what they do in animal rescue. I also believe people will find them a free place to stay.
Elevated Access is a group of private pilots who do it for free, no questions asked.
Hello, my name is Jane.
But get this: if you really want to create a situation of women getting abortions just in case for "birth control," that's what 6 weeks does. Congratulations, woman-haters.
Firstly, the 6-week ban is a complete ban. They are just pretending by throwing a very small bone to women.
Secondly, there is a reason why one might want to put in restrictions, but it has nothing to do with what the Republican legislatures are saying. A fetus is assaulting in order to live. It has stolen an organ. No other human being has this right. For some reason, anti-abortion people think fetuses do. I do not understand it since they are claiming they want to pass fetal personhood bills. Apparently, it only gives privileges and ignores disabilities. I, on the other hand, think the fetus should enjoy all the privileges and disabilities of being a person or human. One of those privileges is once someone has helped me to live through CPR is that I get rights that they not injure me through gross incompetence. If the person doesn't give me CPR, I don't have a right to demand they do so. The time period is simply when we assume the woman decided to be a mother, and it has nothing to do with how likely the fetus is to become a baby.
I *ONE HUNDRED PERCENT* agree with your entire statement above!!! ...A 6 week ban is hypocitical for any Pro Life advocate. There needs to be a FEDERAL LAW against all abortions!!!!!!
Vote blue 💙💙💙💙💙
MSNBC said this nonsense. Gee, I'm surprised.
This is one way to get people coming to Ca or NY, not fleeing..
Imagine if we need "Diabetes Tourism"
Imagine if, just like the abortion debate, we taught people how to not get diabetes (or pregnant) in the first place...
Imagine if you will, a world where people actually took personal responsibility for their actions...
You obviously don't know about type 1 diabetes...the way not to get it, is to not be born at all.
@@brentharrington9235 Accessing abortion _is_ how people can and do take “personal responsibility.”
@@brentharrington9235 Also, Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease. How ya gonna teach them not to get an autoimmune disease “in the first place”?
@@alexwyatt2911 ohh you want to talk about the 5%, not the 95%? You think the minority example is more pertinent to the example at hand?
I guess you're right it fits...95% of abortions are elective and less than 5% are for medical reasons.
It checks out. Irresponsible people make poor decisions and ruin it for the small minority that actually have problems.
Maybe Ca and NY democrats can work in partnership with Planned parenthood and Uhaul to get their moving rental trucks back into their states?
People are also leaving MS and LA. CA (and to a lesser extent NY) are victims of their own success. They rank very well on the Human Development Index (measures of well-being), although not as well as New England. They've become very expensive as a result. CA's damned NIMBYs have done so much to prevent housing construction; it's infuriating. The lesson here is that neoliberal capitalist parties are unable to address these human needs.
"it's just a clump of cells", until decided by the mom/state human? 42 weeks in utero, just a clump of cells...just born? well, let's make you comfortable while your mother and the doctor decide if you are "just a clump of cells" or human (gov northam of Virginia said it and the defense was "he didn't say that" AFTER he was quoted, now it's that didn't happen AFTER you show the video).
ya'll are asking for a dark place.
“A person’s a person no matter how small” - Dr. Seuss
Dr Suess was an abusive pos that hated children
This is what you have to say for the value of life?
Did anybody see Joe Biden‘s tax proposal? 44% capital gains tax. He’s raising the death tax. He’s also proposing taxing on unrealized gains.
Wow! How dare he tax the rich!
It is terrible. How will tax accountants and tax advisers survive if capital gains are taxed at the same rates as income.
As for tax on unrealised gains it only applies to assets which have not been taxed for 90+ years so that would be at least 3 generations of tax exempt asset holdings - unlikely to be an issue for the vast majority of people and I am someone who is strongly against the concept of taxing unrealised gains because history shows that type of wealth tax is nearly always counterproductive
@@Samantha-lg1bwCapital gains effects more than just the "rich"....whatever that means.
@@spankyssurprise1361 lol I don't know of any low income (not rich) people that would find themselves subject to capital gains tax.
@spankyssurprise1361 Wow, what a compelling argument 👏
350 views after an hour... stick with Trump, MSDNC. That's all you got.
How many views do you have, Winnie?
And yet, here you are. Also, regarding the source of your username, Orwell was a socialist and an Antifa icon, who survived a bullet through the throat battling against Franco's fascists in Spain.
@@scottcharney1091 I voted for Bernie twice. The dems rigged two primaries against him. Orwell would likely be a third party guy and you would calling him a Russian
@@scottcharney1091 My reply was hidden. I voted for Bernie twice. I doubt he'd want to live in a country without freedom of speech
@@winstonsmith6607 Sweety- no one believes your BS. Go embarrass yourself elsewhere
How can anyone say "pregnant person" with a straight face ?? WOMEN get pregnant! When the first man gets pregnant, we can revisit language usage.
My dear Jody, the word "woman" does imply somebody who is female, human and (almost) adult, some pregnant persons have only the first two qualities. Some pregnant persons are GIRLS, not women yet.
Why do you think girls are women? Are you attracted to children?
Women aren't persons? That explains a lot...
Women ARE people. Is that a problem for you?
BECAUSE GIRL CHILDREN CAN BE PREGNANT. Of are you comfortable with calling a 10-year-old a “woman”? The kid’# frontal lobe of the brain isn’t even fully developed.
Good for Florida!!!!! ♥♥♥♥♥ ....Children deserve to live.
You better come up with something better than abortion to run on that's not going to work.
Why is that?
@@billplaney2585 it's hard to care about deleting your unborn child when you are homeless in a blue city with a needle hanging out of your arm.
Abortion really is an elitist upper middle class white grrrll fight. Actual people have bigger problems right now.
Why not? It’s worked with evangelical Christians for decades.
Don’t worry women know what they are doing 😊
@@dilsadmeraler obviously not if they need so many abortions...
Do a story on how not to get pregnant
The majority of people who received an abortion in the US were using some form of contraception.
Do a story on minding your own business
They call it reproductive care 😆when the offspring is being killed. And they attack Noem for shooting a dangerous dog, that’s just pet care 😆🤣😂.
It’s not our fault that you forgot it’s healthcare for _reproductive_ organs. Good grief.
@@alexwyatt2911 do you think an abortion is taking out an organ?
@@beefree5215 abortion takes out every single organ for one human.
@@beefree5215 An abortion is the termination of a pregnancy and reproductive healthcare includes Pap smears, fertility testing, contraception prescriptions/insertions, HRT, vasectomies, abortion, prenatal care, perinatal care, STI/STD screening & treatment, hysterectomies, tubal ligation, uterine ablation, testicular cancer screening, erectile dysfunction treatment, and a million other things.
Are you sincerely unaware that people’s reproductive organs frequently require healthcare? What did you think obstetrics and gynecology were??
@@brentharrington9235 Oh, please. You don’t care about other humans or their organs.