How quant trading strategies are developed and tested w/ Ernie Chan

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 เม.ย. 2016
  • EP 052: How quantitative trading strategies are created, scrutinized and introduced to the market w/ Ernie Chan
    * More interviews: chatwithtraders.com
    * Free eBook: chatwithtraders.com/17lessons
    * Twitter: / chatwithtraders
    * Facebook: / chatwithtraders
    * Instagram: / chatwithtraders_
    * Soundcloud: / chat-with-traders
    * Sitcher: www.stitcher.com/podcast/chat-...

ความคิดเห็น • 93

  • @schrodingerscat3912
    @schrodingerscat3912 7 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    seriously the best channel on youtube for trading relating information. this channel is the short cut to understanding an enormous amount of knowledge

  • @WallStWarLord
    @WallStWarLord 7 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Ernie is an absolute genius and quant rocket scientist. We are indeed fortunate that he graciously and generously chooses to share his exceptional intellect and insight.

    • @ChatWithTradersPodcast
      @ChatWithTradersPodcast  7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      +WallStWarLord - yeah, Ernie's great. I've also read one of his books, which was really good.

    • @schrodingerscat3912
      @schrodingerscat3912 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Ernie's books are the first to truly open me up to modern finance and trading. before his books there was nothing but heavy fog in my understanding. I'm really lucky that I landed on his material

    • @tictoc5443
      @tictoc5443 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      does anyone know his performance stats?

    • @metaparcel
      @metaparcel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Speak for yourself. I hate when ass kissers speak for others. He's a smart guy obviously but look at the facts and his success as trader rather than whatever his IQ or insights are. He knows what he's talking about it seems but at the end of the year people want the bottom line performance, regardless of intelligence level. Calm down cheerleader.

    • @bluepavilion82
      @bluepavilion82 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ChatWithTradersPodcast what's his books?

  • @sahilrelan3247
    @sahilrelan3247 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolutely hooked to this channel!

  • @als1023
    @als1023 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Excellent interview, thanks for posting and the lengthy duration.

  • @cetilly
    @cetilly 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Damn!! That was a great discussion. Love hearing Ernie talk candidly about quant trading

    • @makers_lab
      @makers_lab 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      In no way a discussion, but Ernie was great to listen to as always.

  • @Ninja-iq2xt
    @Ninja-iq2xt 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    He is so humble.

  • @agedvagabond
    @agedvagabond ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like that he gets straight to the point in his books.

  • @AshCampbell
    @AshCampbell 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The value in this interview is ridiculous. Thanks

  • @RandyJohnson777
    @RandyJohnson777 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thank you. The divisions made between mean reversion and momentum based approach was enlightening for me in addition to discretionary benefits compared to algorithmic. I am moving deeper into this area of trading I look forward to focusing on the data more and testing.

  • @joecaldor
    @joecaldor 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Glad Ernie is willing to share his expertise

    • @amgineco
      @amgineco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of course though.. sharing expertise NOT the same as sharing "the system"..

  • @Random_dudebro
    @Random_dudebro 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I'm so glad I found this channel. I read Ernies book Algorithmic Trading the day I finished by degree. It was fantastic and the matlab coding examples are still available online even after all this time.

    • @kwekuodum7271
      @kwekuodum7271 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have you developed a quant model to trade so far?? if yes how did it go

    • @Random_dudebro
      @Random_dudebro ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@kwekuodum7271 Many many many.
      Most of them failed due to classic over-engineering issues, others failed due to being too dependent on specific regimes.
      I am managing a sizable sum of cash still but it's a mixture of approaches
      1. Long/Short equity options portfolios (with some futures options added in)
      2. My own Rebalancing portfolio designs with ETFs. ETFs are the best instrument, if you can imagine it, there is an ETF for it.

    • @kwekuodum7271
      @kwekuodum7271 ปีที่แล้ว

      @louis Dwyer have you thought of using python machine learning and data structures to derive news feed from Bloomberg and other resources to influence your trading decisions or better put develop algo’s & quant models to trade on your behalf on the forex exchange market, because it very volatile and I think there’s a lot of potential there , that’s where Renaissance technologies capitalized more

    • @noor-rrr
      @noor-rrr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      are u saying quantifying news sentiment ?

  • @surething119
    @surething119 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Brilliant question mate 18:20

  • @android61242
    @android61242 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I really appreciate this episode. It is difficult with this channel sometimes. You interview a mix of very intelligent traders that provide valuable information; And charlatans.

    • @90deltaderivatives35
      @90deltaderivatives35 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Can you differentiate the charlatans? Curious how you know.

    • @We_Have_Ignition
      @We_Have_Ignition 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@90deltaderivatives35 There's no rigid criteria - have to decide for yourself. Some heuristics could be: Do they have something to sell, from which they derive a majority of their income? Are they excessively self-promoting in the podcast? Do they lack relevant employment experience?
      Extensive employment at well-known firms - like Ernie here - would be a good indicator of honesty.

    • @amgineco
      @amgineco 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@We_Have_Ignition MAYBE.. BUT one could be blinded by the "job history " OR "accreditation" of the subject.. this type of charlatan is one that often gets over on "intelligent" people!

    • @90deltaderivatives35
      @90deltaderivatives35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amgineco exactly my friend, that was kinda what I was getting at. I would consider myself to have a very good bullshit detector, but until someone gets extremely in depth into a subject you kind of truly never know, especially if they have a good tenure.

    • @90deltaderivatives35
      @90deltaderivatives35 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@amgineco of course there are “vibes” and intuitive feelings into this as well.

  • @purpledragon4278
    @purpledragon4278 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Ep 52
    Ernie
    Position sizing is key.
    Even if you're learning from someone you look up to, don't copy 100% because the teacher could withheld some crucial information.
    If you want to get into quant start by automating and backtesting the simplest setups you know of.

  • @shatikaz
    @shatikaz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very honest discourse.

  • @thatsmykulture7266
    @thatsmykulture7266 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome ... you asked very good questions!

  • @jmoz
    @jmoz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Genius man.

  • @bhhmidi4
    @bhhmidi4 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks!

  • @shoylu88
    @shoylu88 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Whats the historical performance of their strategies? Benchmark , Sharp ratio, etc?

  • @raymondpeng2005
    @raymondpeng2005 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    "Fit well -> Over-fitting but lack of prediction power.
    Make sure it's simple enough and sensible"

    • @spadbob24
      @spadbob24 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Causality ?

  • @revenge9431
    @revenge9431 8 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    this is an excellent interview thank u for posting. is there a way that ernie provides training etc?

    • @ChatWithTradersPodcast
      @ChatWithTradersPodcast  8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Mr International - thanks, I'm glad you liked the interview. I believe Ernie does some workshops, he also writes on his blog and has a couple books. You can find links to all of this in the show notes here: chatwithtraders.com/ep-052-ernie-chan/

    • @immortalsofar7977
      @immortalsofar7977 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ThomasCCook I took a look at the EPAT program from your link. Having probably completed it by now, do you still recommend it? Any negatives? Thanks!

    • @ThomasCCook
      @ThomasCCook 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@immortalsofar7977 YES. I highly recommend it. They have an incredible program for the cost. They have several free courses you can try via Quantra to get an idea of the quality of content. But yes, I highly recommend their program.

  • @M.G.R...
    @M.G.R... 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    *47:25** ; **48:23*
    *50:04** ; **50:31*
    *52:52* ; *50:46*

  • @DatDereBlueRidge
    @DatDereBlueRidge 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I'd be interested in metrics of top level algo developer vs top level discretionary trader.

    • @17teacmrocks
      @17teacmrocks 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      easy. just look at performance systematic funds like citadel vs [primarily] prop shops like jane st and family owned hedge funds.
      in my exp, systematic beats discretionary except when discretionary has insider info

    • @mmm-cake
      @mmm-cake 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Insider info is against the rules of trade and shouldn’t be considered in a comment such as yours unless jealousy is a factor. Sometimes a group of intelligent traders may outperform algos in a server farm; that’s no reason to throw rocks in the glass house. Market is ever changing.

  • @hamisintunzwenimana8083
    @hamisintunzwenimana8083 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good
    Technical
    1. General; advice - strategy

  • @dontwannabefound
    @dontwannabefound ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn’t the solution to having a model that works in practice is to dry test the model live in prod, seems like that is almost table stakes before running a strategy with live funds, assuming your strategy itself does not modify the market measurably

  • @kerrylitvin2810
    @kerrylitvin2810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    He mentions MatLab what about the Wolfram Language (a.k.a. Mathematica)?

  • @LicPerroberto
    @LicPerroberto ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow... i need this translated.

  • @answerth
    @answerth 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Here's some gold:
    "Because of the lack of diversification for a discretionary trader, it is very likely that your Sharpe ratio will not be as high as a well diversified algorithmic trading portfolio"
    In other words, algo trading is way harder than you originally anticipated.

    • @adriangoh4182
      @adriangoh4182 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      how is that the implication from that statement? it is ideal to want a higher sharpe ratio

  • @HarbiDr
    @HarbiDr 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Seems rather intuitive - can't replace a book with a podcast but eh nice nonetheless

  • @ClearOutSamskaras
    @ClearOutSamskaras 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    2022

  • @saywhat4229
    @saywhat4229 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    wooo

  • @annajones9701
    @annajones9701 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    All the Chinese were best on my MSc in financial mathematics course

  • @HartmutGoetze
    @HartmutGoetze ปีที่แล้ว

    🙏❤️

  • @soykanilhan8349
    @soykanilhan8349 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you add Turkish subtitles please

  • @nafiurzawad321
    @nafiurzawad321 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    please, turn on CAPTION

  • @mailmithunp
    @mailmithunp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    he only spoke of backtest ,what about forward test,don't quants do in sample and out of sample testing ?

    • @DimitriBianco
      @DimitriBianco 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, many of us do forward (validation) testing as well. For banking it is required.

    • @raymondphilip6232
      @raymondphilip6232 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@DimitriBianco hello

  • @morris5648
    @morris5648 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Severn year old AI is like talking about Model T cars.

  • @homelesstrader8283
    @homelesstrader8283 8 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Harold?

    • @mitesh8utube
      @mitesh8utube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Nope. Chinese Kumar.

  • @FreeLearnclass
    @FreeLearnclass 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    for the fuck sake plz enable caption subtitle

  • @prashantpatadia2586
    @prashantpatadia2586 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I WANT TO LEARN QUANT TRADING

    • @raymondphilip6232
      @raymondphilip6232 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is nothing to learn, u only need to experiment everything

    • @prashantpatadia2586
      @prashantpatadia2586 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raymondphilip6232 you tried everything

    • @raymondphilip6232
      @raymondphilip6232 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@prashantpatadia2586 yep i tried everything and made my own system

    • @prashantpatadia2586
      @prashantpatadia2586 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@raymondphilip6232 that's great

    • @godsonirabor4971
      @godsonirabor4971 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      what lanaguages do you need to learn

  • @oaasal
    @oaasal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Interest narrowed because of pile of money Ernie can earn.

  • @srutiagarwal2472
    @srutiagarwal2472 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really wanted to know People without Maths Background Can they learn Quant Trading??

    • @Acid31337
      @Acid31337 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They just learn enough math to do it. It's quite small amount to learn.

    • @kevtherev8194
      @kevtherev8194 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      NO

    • @ivoriankoua3916
      @ivoriankoua3916 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@NM-ex4jk Not All , You need to cover Stochastic , Markov Chains , Complex Analysis ,Group Theory .....(and many other that I forget to mention)

    • @ivoriankoua3916
      @ivoriankoua3916 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@NM-ex4jk All the info are avaible online for free , there's a reason why top Bank only hire PhD student for those job , and even in quant curriculum those course are clearly stated.

    • @ivoriankoua3916
      @ivoriankoua3916 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NM-ex4jk You was referencing about Quant and mention KhanAcademy (that's complete nonsense) , I do trade using Price Action not Quant and yes I'm aware that's only 5% of Trading but for this discussion, the remaining 95% doesn't matter as we are talking about Quant foundation , KhanAcademy can't provide you that , which real experience do you need for that (common sense perhaps...)?

  • @mmm-cake
    @mmm-cake 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Smart cat

  • @soonpaomeng
    @soonpaomeng 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Haha typical sign of failure in brownian motion, weiner process, ito lemma

  • @clarencewhite8134
    @clarencewhite8134 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ERNIE CHAN WORK FOR STARTRADERS.COM ASK DAVID LAUER. THANKS CLARENCE A WHITE.