Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
All of the judges involved in this case that ruled against the 2A need to be investigated and they should be allowed to be sued in civil court for damages to every American citizen in Illinois.
The problem is these judges denying Illinoisans their rights need to be held accountable. This is the issue with our judicial system. None of them are held accountable for flawed or improper acts, words, or decisions. And they need to be held account personally (trialed and judged) not just be disbarred. (then jailed if found guilty)
While this order may delay progress, it doesn't end the fight. We need to keep pushing for clarity and recognition of our constitutional rights-no compromises when it comes to the Second Amendment!
Let me get to any other state first!!! Then I'll help build the fence! Or... we could just build it at about Springfield. Let from Springfield north do whatever the hell they want, and leave the rest of the state alone!
My dad gave me my first hunting rifle when I was eleven. It was a Remington Springfield 1903 30-06. He was Navy and served in Pearl Harbor in WW2 and brought two home with him after the war.
Thanks for getting into the nuts and bolts of how this all works. If the supreme court rules that a law is constitutional, shouldn't any lower court judge that ruled it unconstitutional lose their job?
@@demisx Depends on how many more seats on SCOTUS Trump can fill in the next 4 years, and who he puts in them. Sadly we know Congress will do all it can to prevent a 100% Constitutionalist SCOTUS, as it would help in removing too many of them from office.
The main issue is, there is NO restrictions on TYPES of arms a citizen of our nation can own within the second amendment. Restrictions on firearms didn't come in to play until the early 20th century, with the Thomson sub machine guns in the hands of the citizens.
Komifornia here Al Gore ithyms fueled. Guns and guitars brother and thanks for the update. CRPA member. C'mon SCOTUS!!! Happy New Year Anthony!! FREEDOM 2025
God bless you Anthony! Happy New Year! We appreciate all you do and keeping up with what's going on in the judicial system and bringing it to us with that meticulous mind you have.🎉🎉🎉
Greetings from west-central IL, this state has been in decline for decades thanks to the idiot politicians that get elected. Hopefully Pritzker is the next Governor to go to jail.
In US v Miller the SCOTUS ruled that short barreled shotguns are not protected because the have no valid military use. Therefore, firearms with military use are protected for the people to own. When did that change?
We shouldn't have to put up with this 'legal dance' after Bruen. SCOTUS should put all circuits on notice about NEW lawful interpretations. There's no excuse for the 7th circuit should default to OLD tests about such cases.
How can the state keep saying these guns are so unsafe. Have they ever shown why they are supposedly dangerous? If they are, why don’t we have millions of horrible incidents with these guns? This is all so sickening.
is there a process for removing biased judges from lower level federal courts after they have several decisions overturned by the Supreme Court? Feels like the Supreme Court should have the authority to do this, maybe with a 3 strikes rule or something.
This is absolute BS! If a law is deemed to be unconstitutional, another court, should not be able to stay that decision. The people of Illinois should be able to capitalize on their right until a final verdict is made. And, if it makes it to the Supreme Court of the United States, the Supreme Court of the US decides that this is unconstitutional, then the judges who went against that decision prior should be relieved of their position. There’s no consequences for ruling against the constitution, and that is why we have all these stupid decisions. People in Illinois should just say no and do whatever they have to do to get these guns and magazines. You can’t put everybody in jail.
Say these two issues finally are ruled on by the Supreme Court. These states will just pass another infringing law and we’ll start all over again. Why can’t these politicians be stopped or held accountable for this practice?
July 23, 2018, in a settlement with Cody Wilson's Defense Distributed,The State Department and Justice Department stated that semi auto forearms below .50 are not inherently military, the definition of military equipment or weapons of war means magazines with a capacity greater than 50 rounds .
Stay Strong/Safe 🙏🏼💪🏽💯!!! The Truth Will Set you Free!!! Be Blessed and a Blessing! "We The People By The People For The People" United We Stand Divided We Fall...🛐 Eyes Wide Open NOT Eyes Wide Shut. 2A All The Way.!.
Until there is a solution to these districts that defy SCOTUS, this will continue. Somewhere, somehow, SCOTUS should be FORCED to take cases that are causing CC splits.
Last I read the 2A,it does not address type of arms. Period. Seems clear on its face to a 2nd grade reading level. Since it is provided by the people for the people to check a tyrannical government, the govt attempting to nullify its basic language should not be ignored or taken lightly.
How *Bruen* Reinforces the Right to Own AR-15s and Military-Style Arms The Second Amendment states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Historically, this meant all able-bodied citizens could be called to militia duty and were expected to bring their own arms-arms suitable for military use. In *United States v. Miller* (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects weapons with a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia." By that logic, military-style weapons like AR-15s should be protected. Fast forward to *District of Columbia v. Heller* (2008), where the Court affirmed an individual’s right to bear arms for self-defense but excluded "dangerous and unusual weapons," a standard often used to justify bans on military-style arms. This creates a contradiction: *Miller* protects militia-related arms, but *Heller* excludes many of them. Enter *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen* (2022). The Court ruled that firearm regulations must be deeply rooted in the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment. Historically, citizens were expected to own arms suitable for militia service-precisely the type of weapons now under attack. If *Bruen* requires laws to align with historical tradition, then bans on military-style arms like the AR-15 contradict the Second Amendment’s original intent. You can’t claim these arms are not protected without dismantling *Miller* and ignoring *Bruen’s* historical analysis. The Second Amendment was designed to protect citizens' rights to own arms suitable for defense and militia service. The AR-15 and similar weapons are modern equivalents of the muskets and rifles citizens historically owned. *Bruen* reinforces this, making it clear that bans on such arms are inconsistent with the Constitution.
I have a serious question and I have asked it before but never gotten an answer. How is it that all these states are using bruen to get rid of these assault weapon bans ect, a case that was fought in NY state, yet NY state is not following the bruen ruling itself still enforcing safe act among other unconstitutional laws?
These judges which make such treasonous decisions need to be removed from the bench and permanently banned from any and all positions of public trust and or elected office or appointment to any position thereby.
Happy New Year everyone! May God bless you and your family this year!
May God also bless your family.
Thank you and God bless you and yours.
Blessing to you and Family Always my Brotha!!!
What about The Illinois' Constitution's militia exemption is not being mentioned to the public?
Is there any remedy, when the USSC deliberately and VERY clearly sets a precedent, and lower courts simply operate as if it never happened?
The people need to stand up and remove these anti constitutional judges
*( there called bananas judges!
And how should that be done?
@@toranaga1969 Work on elections. Judges are nominated or appointed by politicians.
Hush
@@toranaga1969by any means necessary as they are committing treason. This makes them criminals at the highest level.
These videos prove that the government is fighting hard to disarm you.
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
Yup. judging by all the other arm chair QB comments, predictable rhetoric, it's evident this country is cooked by complacent weaklings who lack spines and brains
All of the judges involved in this case that ruled against the 2A need to be investigated and they should be allowed to be sued in civil court for damages to every American citizen in Illinois.
Exactly 100 Percent!🧐😏❤❤❤❤
Exactly Correct!
In all likelihood, these judges are all compromised. They are kept in line by threatening to expose their crimes. Epstein Island? Hmmmm?
They won't be they are in it together except Thomas
Most are elected first. Think about it
Abolish the NFA
ATF Afuera!
The problem is these judges denying Illinoisans their rights need to be held accountable. This is the issue with our judicial system. None of them are held accountable for flawed or improper acts, words, or decisions. And they need to be held account personally (trialed and judged) not just be disbarred. (then jailed if found guilty)
Exactly you are on the money no punishment for obvious violation of constitution and our rights.
I don’t abide by their bull shit laws..!! Period..!!
@@bigtuna5334Neither do I.
Beretta M9 was "military use", as was the 1911.... utterly dumb.
Winchester lever action as well.
dint give them any help
So were BB gun's used in training of Gomer Pyle.
Don't forget the M14 or the civilian version Springfield M1A
Black powder muskets circa 1776. Military weapons!
While this order may delay progress, it doesn't end the fight. We need to keep pushing for clarity and recognition of our constitutional rights-no compromises when it comes to the Second Amendment!
IT ALREADY IS QUITE CLEAR AND SUCCINCT:
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!
We don’t need to fight for “clarity”. “Shall not be infringed” is quite clear.
Thank for keeping us informed !
In the Midwest, "Escape From New York" means Escape From Chicago.
Happy New Year, Anthony and 2A Americans!!!
Happy New Year! 🎉🇺🇸
Needs to go up front of our U.S. Supreme Court Justices once in for all.
Just a fun fact, the U.S. Constitution Article Three state "supreme Court". Go check it.
Only thing the 2A says about types of arms is "SHALL NOT INFRINGE!"
Best comment on the 2nd amendment and all cases about it -- 👆🏽right there.
Just build a fence around Illinois, call it a federal prison.
Let me get to any other state first!!! Then I'll help build the fence!
Or... we could just build it at about Springfield. Let from Springfield north do whatever the hell they want, and leave the rest of the state alone!
Huh aren't the drones up there already?
Sounds good! We'll put you in charge of drawing the line as you live there an know what's going on.😅lol
@@robertschemonia5617 cowards leaving the state instead of fighting back. your ancestors would hate your weak mentality.
How about just Cook County. That's the only thing wrong with Illinois.
Thank you for keeping us informed
And now they no why no one registered crooked state of Illinois
Shhhh.... don't tell them that... they are too dumb to figure it out themselves. (Southern Illinois resident here)
Oh there are plenty that registered. I didn’t and never will comply.
My dad gave me my first hunting rifle when I was eleven. It was a Remington Springfield 1903 30-06. He was Navy and served in Pearl Harbor in WW2 and brought two home with him after the war.
@Strive2Survive1960 god bless your father.
Thanks for getting into the nuts and bolts of how this all works. If the supreme court rules that a law is constitutional, shouldn't any lower court judge that ruled it unconstitutional lose their job?
LYNCHED FOR TREASON..
ATF WAGES A PRIVATE WAR AGAINST US ON U.S SOIL, NOBODY PAID THE PRICE!
WHO IS GOVERNMENT SERVING, AGAIN?
Seventh Circuit needs some ExLax, they are full of it.
Wouldn't help cause their faces are stuck doing a rectum viewing and is scheduled to conclude in 2999.
Absolutely fantastic thank you for all the information you passed along 😀 😊
I Wish The Supreme court Would Just Come Out And State That Any Gun Laws Are Totally Unconstitutional , Period End Of Story !!!
100%. But would never happen.
@@demisx Depends on how many more seats on SCOTUS Trump can fill in the next 4 years, and who he puts in them. Sadly we know Congress will do all it can to prevent a 100% Constitutionalist SCOTUS, as it would help in removing too many of them from office.
The main issue is, there is NO restrictions on TYPES of arms a citizen of our nation can own within the second amendment. Restrictions on firearms didn't come in to play until the early 20th century, with the Thomson sub machine guns in the hands of the citizens.
We have A OUT OF CONTROL GOVERNOR PERIOD, 👁️
What about The Illinois' Constitution's militia exemption is not being mentioned to the public?
Komifornia here Al Gore ithyms fueled. Guns and guitars brother and thanks for the update. CRPA member. C'mon SCOTUS!!! Happy New Year Anthony!! FREEDOM 2025
👍⛽🚀🇺🇸
Happy New Year, everyone!
Thank you for the update.
God bless you Anthony! Happy New Year! We appreciate all you do and keeping up with what's going on in the judicial system and bringing it to us with that meticulous mind you have.🎉🎉🎉
Good Evening from Central Illinois and thanks for the update. Happy New Year
hello -also central illinois. i hate prixter :( happy new year
Greetings. Lived in central IL for 49 yrs. Couldn’t take it any more. Had to get out. Miss the home I made, friends and family. But I’m sane.
Greetings from west-central IL, this state has been in decline for decades thanks to the idiot politicians that get elected. Hopefully Pritzker is the next Governor to go to jail.
Always more cases, court refuses to actually read the 2nd and rule accordingly.
Dang on, Dude! U friggin smart as [[ell! Thanks for the updates!!! Interesting as well as intriguing!
Happy New Year everyone!
Happy New Year!
Thank you for the vid!!
Thank you for the information.
Any judge or court that does not uphold the Constitution to the letter should be disbarred
Thanks for your hard work.. From Illinois
Clear and concise. Thank you.
Happy New Year. Thanks for doing a great job. Looking forward to some even better stuff in the coming year 🎉
Happy New Year 🎊🎆🎈
Happy new year!
Happy new year, some things will never change until the culprits are held accountable
Happy New Year, Anthony!
Thanks, bro.
Thanks for watching!
In US v Miller the SCOTUS ruled that short barreled shotguns are not protected because the have no valid military use. Therefore, firearms with military use are protected for the people to own. When did that change?
Thank you!! Happy New Year!!
The games played in lower courts......is really exhausting
All arms all the time, shall not be infringed!!
Why do these circuit courts rely on their precedents and then completely ignore SCOTUS precedents…
Thanks for updates
Thank you for your videos. Happy new year
Happy new year... thank you for the post.
Thank you
Thanks for watching!
I love all the information that you so eloquently decimate. But man oh man a cliff note version would be much appreciated.
Where does it say in the Second Amendment that military grade weapons are not allowed?
Happy new year.
Happy New Year, buddy🎉!
Just getting to know you. Love your succinct descriptions. I am new subscriber now!
Great content and he helps to make Armed Scholars out of all of us.
Happy New Year to all. 2A shall not be infringed. Period. ⭐️🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸⭐️
im getting sick of the supreme court CONTINUALLY punting rifle and mag bans... DO YOUR F***ING JOB
Get rid of these lying federal Judges
Thanks Anthony
Unfortunately things will never change. It will be a constant battle
For The Love Of God.... " Shall Not Be Infringed "
The Supreme Court needs to repeal the NFA
We shouldn't have to put up with this 'legal dance' after Bruen. SCOTUS should put all circuits on notice about NEW lawful interpretations. There's no excuse for the 7th circuit should default to OLD tests about such cases.
Excellent facts
Great video
How can the state keep saying these guns are so unsafe. Have they ever shown why they are supposedly dangerous?
If they are, why don’t we have millions of horrible incidents with these guns? This is all so sickening.
The thing that doesn't exist are so callef assault weapons.. that whole term needs to be stricken from all the cases.
Have a blessed New Year!
is there a process for removing biased judges from lower level federal courts after they have several decisions overturned by the Supreme Court? Feels like the Supreme Court should have the authority to do this, maybe with a 3 strikes rule or something.
@@keredeht there’s other ways but they’re frowned upon. Lol
This is absolute BS! If a law is deemed to be unconstitutional, another court, should not be able to stay that decision. The people of Illinois should be able to capitalize on their right until a final verdict is made. And, if it makes it to the Supreme Court of the United States, the Supreme Court of the US decides that this is unconstitutional, then the judges who went against that decision prior should be relieved of their position. There’s no consequences for ruling against the constitution, and that is why we have all these stupid decisions. People in Illinois should just say no and do whatever they have to do to get these guns and magazines. You can’t put everybody in jail.
Say these two issues finally are ruled on by the Supreme Court. These states will just pass another infringing law and we’ll start all over again. Why can’t these politicians be stopped or held accountable for this practice?
SCOTUS Needs to stop these lower court Shanahan and intentional delays
🎉Happy New Year!🎉
Hello Al
there was no recent 8 to 1 vote on any gun laws
July 23, 2018, in a settlement with Cody Wilson's Defense Distributed,The State Department and Justice Department stated that semi auto forearms below .50 are not inherently military, the definition of military equipment or weapons of war means magazines with a capacity greater than 50 rounds .
They definitely need to replace these judges
Stay Strong/Safe 🙏🏼💪🏽💯!!! The Truth Will Set you Free!!! Be Blessed and a Blessing! "We The People By The People For The People" United We Stand Divided We Fall...🛐 Eyes Wide Open NOT Eyes Wide Shut. 2A All The Way.!.
Happy '25 broski, thank you! 😊
Any restriction to our constitutional rights shouldn’t be allowed until the state can prove it. It shouldn’t be the other way around
Did you have a typo here?
@ yes sir “shouldn’t”
Until there is a solution to these districts that defy SCOTUS, this will continue. Somewhere, somehow, SCOTUS should be FORCED to take cases that are causing CC splits.
Happy New Year.. these judges should be removed under the terms of the Constitution.
Last I read the 2A,it does not address type of arms. Period. Seems clear on its face to a 2nd grade reading level. Since it is provided by the people for the people to check a tyrannical government, the govt attempting to nullify its basic language should not be ignored or taken lightly.
Thanks
Sounds like freedom is coming in a few more weeks.
Court judges need held accountable for these unconstitutional injustice
Thank you, and happy new year!
Oh, I know, you could interview the person in TX that was held at gunpoint by the ATF for making made in TX suppressors!!
How *Bruen* Reinforces the Right to Own AR-15s and Military-Style Arms
The Second Amendment states: "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Historically, this meant all able-bodied citizens could be called to militia duty and were expected to bring their own arms-arms suitable for military use.
In *United States v. Miller* (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects weapons with a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia." By that logic, military-style weapons like AR-15s should be protected.
Fast forward to *District of Columbia v. Heller* (2008), where the Court affirmed an individual’s right to bear arms for self-defense but excluded "dangerous and unusual weapons," a standard often used to justify bans on military-style arms. This creates a contradiction: *Miller* protects militia-related arms, but *Heller* excludes many of them.
Enter *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen* (2022). The Court ruled that firearm regulations must be deeply rooted in the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment. Historically, citizens were expected to own arms suitable for militia service-precisely the type of weapons now under attack.
If *Bruen* requires laws to align with historical tradition, then bans on military-style arms like the AR-15 contradict the Second Amendment’s original intent. You can’t claim these arms are not protected without dismantling *Miller* and ignoring *Bruen’s* historical analysis.
The Second Amendment was designed to protect citizens' rights to own arms suitable for defense and militia service. The AR-15 and similar weapons are modern equivalents of the muskets and rifles citizens historically owned. *Bruen* reinforces this, making it clear that bans on such arms are inconsistent with the Constitution.
I have a serious question and I have asked it before but never gotten an answer. How is it that all these states are using bruen to get rid of these assault weapon bans ect, a case that was fought in NY state, yet NY state is not following the bruen ruling itself still enforcing safe act among other unconstitutional laws?
Happy New Year
Happy new year
Happy Healthy New Year -!
You the man
They need to read the definition of armaments - military weapons and equipment. Arms is short for armamanets. This is really simple.
This is why I don't assume the Supreme Court will decide on our side. Stop putting faith in the Courts.
Nice job
Crooks will always have all the best types of guns, therefore good men must too. Semper Fi.
These judges which make such treasonous decisions need to be removed from the bench and permanently banned from any and all positions of public trust and or elected office or appointment to any position thereby.
At the end of the day you alone are responsible for whatever rights you wish to have.