If you're having a hard time viewing the video, I would turn up the resolution of the video. TH-cam likes to compress the video quality unless it is as the maximum resolution. Thank you all for the support!
If we had the technology back then to see this happening underwater I'm sure it would be pretty chaotic to see and scary at the same time watching a ship rip and tear itself apart as it falls to the bottom of the ocean with relentless force.
Feeds into my Thalassophobia. I’m not afraid of the ocean itself, but it’s massive size and who knows what’s hiding in there. Even if we mapped out the whole sea floor you can’t do it all at once and even if you could there’s an atmosphere above you that is filled with creatures. Who knows what we haven’t found yet down there?
It's fascinating that, amidst all that pressure and destruction, there are still drinking glasses upright in the wreck that look as they were left on the surface.
Why would drinking glasses be affected by pressure? I assume you mean the water pressure and it's only deadly when there's a huge difference between the inner pressure of say a contained space such as inside a submarine (often closer to 1 atmosphere) and the ever increasing outer pressure (striving to fill that void). If the inner pressure is the same as the outer pressure then saturation divers can enter a diving bell, close it, raise the pressure (gradually and slowly of course) to the level of the depth they will be diving/working at, lower the diving bell and open the bottom hatch and exit the diving bell. A glass however has no cavities and as it fills with water there's no pressure difference for there is no contained space with surface level pressure. This is obvious in regards to the different conditions of the bow and stern part of the wreck. Almost all of the bow section was already filled with water when it plunged below the surface and hence there were no air-pockets/contained space to give in to the outer pressure forces. The stern section however had a cargo hold which had been shut and this became a contained space with surface level pressure. As the stern sank ever deeper the pressure gradient on this space increased until it violently imploded leaving the stern a twisted mess. As for the destruction. Well, it wasn't spread evenly all over the superstructure of the ship once it hit the bottom. Some parts took the brunt of the forces. Others experienced minor forces. Hence why some of the glasses are intact. Air disaster investigators find several intact objects where planes have crashed at high speed with no survivors. I'm fairly certain that what is still somewhat intact is found in the bow section of the wreck.
@@McLarenMercedesThe glass and carafe were found way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) on an upright wash stand on shelves that would've had guard rails. But no way the higher up heavier carafe would have stayed in place if the bow took such a steep angle at 0:12. Also, the stand faced forward toward the bow so no way.
@@DavidWilliams-so2dyin reality i dont think there was an implosion. Implosion’s generally happen when a water and air tight container is no longer strong enough to hold out the pressure outside. Titanic’s stern wouldnt have been 100% air tight (even in air pockets). I’ve read (dont know for sure its true) that the extreme damage to the stern is all blown outward, not inward like an implosion. The inrush of water being forced into the wreck faster than the air could escape by the accelerated sinking would have blown out any windows and weak areas of the ship and because the stern wasnt stream lined anything that caused drag in the water got torn off. (Im not an expert so dont know for sure what im saying is 100% true or if im explaining it right but i did read something to that effect)
@@jesslambert4819 If by "destroyed by ego and stupidity," you mean that Titanic was believed to be unsinkable and the crew was careless, I'm afraid to inform you that is incorrect. Titanic was never called unsinkable, but "practically unsinkable" (in other words, nearly unsinkable). Also, she wasn't the only ship referred to as such. Cunard Line's R.M.S Lusitania was also dubbed practically unsinkable, and she sank after being torpedoed during WWI. This was during a time when almost everyone was incredibly confident in maritime safety, and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster. As for Titanic's crew, they were some of the best at sea during the time. It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night, as he wasn't alive to defend himself at the inquiries. However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security.
To OP. What "greatness" ? The Cunard Liners Mauretania and Lusitania were *faster* (and more profitable) and the Olympic class liners which White Star Line built lost the record of the world's largest ship in 1913 already to the German ocean liner SS Imperator and its slightly larger sister ship SS Vaterland. After them ever larger and faster ocean liners were launched. When it came to luxury the ocean liners improved upon that pretty much yearly as more modern and technically superior ships emerged. RMS Aquitania launched in 1913 had much emphasis on luxury in an effort by Cunard to beat White Star Line there too. She was much loved by her passengers who called her "the Ship Beautiful". And she served *both* in WWI and WWII. White Star Line struggled economically even before the Olympic Class liners were launched and once motorships (diesel-electric and steam-turbines) appeared in the 1930's the old coal-burned ocean liners which were manually fed with coal instantly became *outdated* . Hence why those who still were around were scrapped in the 1930's. Coal was no longer easily available (hence spiraling costs) not to mention that coal needs large and bulky coal bunkers. Fact is they were so huge they took up 1/6th of the total cargo of any coal-burning ship. Motorships don't need a huge labor force feeding coal manually either. No, heres the harsh reality: Titanic is remembered *because* she sank and a lot of people died on her maiden voyage. But had she never sunk and missed the iceberg? She would have gone down as a footnote in shipping history. On her own she wouldn't have stood out. The *sinking* made her immortal. I reiterate: The Cunard Liners held the Blue RIband and were faster and more profitable (and shipping lines are ultimate in it for the *business* ). Larger, more technically advanced and luxurious ships were constantly being designed and built. So unless Titanic would have served with distinction during WWI as a hospital or troop carrying ship I can't see any greatness being in her future. Certainly not in a way which sets her out from the other ocean liners. Assertions backed up by nothing valid or without historical scope is a myopic outlook on anything, never mind famous disasters.
@@theminingassassin16 "It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night" Not quite true. Titanic had received several warnings from other ships about icebergs which had been spotted. During the inquiry following the disaster it emerged that Captain Smith had intended to go around the area with the ice which would have resulted in a minor detour. Captain Smith informed Bruce Ismay of this who realized that this would mean that Titanic would arrive in New York several hours late. In fact it would most likely arrive at port late in the evening. This didn't sit well with Ismay at all. How so? If Titanic arrived late in the evening it would be dark and nobody would witness the ship arriving except for the dock workers. Ismay wanted all the headlines and he wouldn't get those if everybody in New York had already gone to bed. Even worse was that all the passengers would be ready to go to sleep as well and therefore would be eager to get off the ship as soon as possible and hurry to their homes, hotels or in the case of the many immigrants the processing station at Ellis Island. *Nobody* likes to finish a travel late in the evening or at night. It's not so strange that late night flights are cheaper today. The press would most certainly not turn up either, hence no great headline in the newspapers. But if Titanic maintained its course it would arrive in New York during the day and people and the press would gather to see her. This of course meant going through an area they *all knew* had several icebergs. This decision was Captain Smith's but Bruce Ismay, the company president, exerted pressure on the captain to do so. Since the captain has the final say on his ship he was blamed and Bruce Ismay let off lightly. Most however knew *he* was the real reason this decision was taken in the first place. Another factor to consider is that Titanic was *already* delayed and late as her maiden voyage had been postponed due to the Olympic colliding with HMS Hawke and needed urgent repairs. The 1912 Coal strike also meant that there was a shortage of coal and White Star Line had to reroute the deliveries allocated to their other ships so that Titanic could have enough for her maiden voyage. This also meant that these White Star liners had to stay in harbor and their voyages were postponed. Some passengers however got rebooked on the Titanic... Another mishap which might have ended so much worse is when Titanic steamed out of Southampton. The ship City of New York snapped her moorings as Titanic passed and nearly collided with her. Fortunately a quick-thinking thug saw what was happening and prevented a minor disaster. So the maiden voyage delayed be almost a month, coal worker strike leading to cancelled journeys for other White Star ships and the near collision with the ship City of New York were already too many delays and bad news for Ismay. He felt that he could ill-afford another fiasco. The ship arriving delayed by half a day therefore wasn't an alternative Ismay was willing to accept. Yet another factors influencing Ismay's decision was that White Star Line had economical difficulties before they built the Olympic Class liners and gambled on them becoming huge successes. Titanic's maiden voyage had to be resounding success. This ship did also NOT go at full speed that night. Not all of the boilers were lit for starters. And what kind of a captain and crew would push a brand-new ship at top speed anyway? New ships have to be broken in first. Same a new cars or any new equipment. Full speed also burns a lot of coal and Titanic was short on it anyway following the strike. High speed is correct but Titanic wasn't going full speed ahead. "and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster" Really? You know White Star Line alone had lost 4 ships before the Titanic... Atlantic sank in 1873. 562 people died. Naronic was a cargo and livestock ship that disappeared in 1893 while sailing from Liverpool to New York. To this day it is uncertain what happened to Naronic. Suevic sank in 1907. Republic (II), sailing from New York to the Mediterranean, in heavy fog, was smashed into by another ship, causing Republic to slowly sink in 1909. On 24 January, Republic sank stern first; at 15,378 tons, she was the largest ship to have sunk until then. Shipping disasters werent unusual in the early 1900's... Examples (all a few years before Titanic) 1902 Camorta - The ship was caught in a cyclone and sank in the Irrawaddy Delta on 6 May with the loss of all 655 passengers and 82 crew. 1904 General Slocum - The paddle steamer caught fire and sank in New York City's East River on 15 June. 1,029 people were killed, making it New York City's greatest loss of life until the September 11 attacks. 1904 Norge - On 28 June the ship ran aground on Helen's Reef near Rockall. 635 people were killed; 160 survivors spent as much as eight days in open boats before rescue. 1906 Sirio - On 4 August the cargo steamship sank after running aground and suffered a boiler explosion on the Punta Hormigas, a reef off Hormigas Island, two and a half miles east of Cape Palos, Cartagena, Spain. 293, including Italian and Spanish emigrants bound for Argentina, of the 645 aboard were lost. Other sources put the death toll at over 500. 1909 Waratah - About 27 July, the steamship, en route from Australia to London, was lost without trace off Durban on the east coast of South Africa. All 211 aboard were lost. Naming but a few... "and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster" Given the light of the other disasters I find that statement hard to believe. "However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security." 1. He knew there were icebergs in the area. 2. He listened to Ismay's advice of arriving in New York on time to avoid more bad headlines or lack of headlines at all. 3. Captain Smith was a veteran from an era in which disaster were common. What false sense of security could he possibly have had with his experience? He gambled and rolled the dice believing any iceberg wuld be spotted in time... Please verify all the sunken ships I bring up here.
To person with Mercedes in their name: Think what you want , but this is how I see it. Olympic and Titanic were considered groundbreaking when they were put into service, and their luxury was well received by passengers. Also, they weren’t made to be faster than Cunard’s Greyhound class. In fact, no ship would beat Mauretania’s speed record until around 20 years after she got the Blue Riband from Lusitania. White Star Line knew they couldn’t beat the speed record, so they focused on everything else, and I feel like they did it very well. Also, the German ships were built to be larger than the Olympic class because that was the name of the game when it came to building ships during the time. One company would do something, and then everyone else would try to top it. I would also like to point out that if Britannic was completed and put into service as she was intended, she would have likely been able to rival other ships of that generation in luxury. People also remember Olympic for being one of the greatest ships of her time, and I feel like Titanic would have been the same if she didn’t sink. Maybe she wouldn’t have reached the same level of fame, but I think she would have been close. Also, I don’t see how WSL’s financial situation has anything to do with Titanic’s demise. Finally, Olympic, along with many other ships like Vaterland (renamed Leviathan when she was taken by the Americans after the war) was refitted with new boilers that burned oil instead of coal after WWI, so I think you may have been mistaken on that point.
It's quite haunting to know that in hundreds of years, people will only ever recognize wreck by it's propellers and be left wondering how it was once attached to a giant Ocean Liner.
@@ianloeb1672they most defiantly will be I can only assume their waiting for them to naturally detach from the ship because they would be incredibly difficult To remove
That music just... fits this somehow. It really drives home how stressful and terrifying it was in the victim's final moments. Fantastic choice! I really hope I get over my fear of shipwrecks someday so I can watch more detailed videos of the wreck.
This is the best clip that I've ever seen of the sinking, It gives you an idea of just how deep the Atlantic really is and how insignificant she really is. Its amazing that it stayed as intact as she did given the forces involved
It is amazing how much more intact military ships are on the bottom even with heavy battle damage. It shows just how much tougher they are constructed.
The actual impacts on the bow and stern were actually extremely in depth great job honestly a huge loss of 1,500 passengers and a great Captain and the ways the survivors lives were impacted. I hope that the ones who survived who have since passed get to see their loved ones again.
Yes, the bow didn’t fall vertically straight downward, but glided slightly forward as well as down. The stern did fall straight down, but whirled around like a sycamore seed as it did so.
I think it was more the idea she “sank like a stone” because she was a heavy bitch and did just drop, nothing to slow nor stop her descent til she reached the ocean floor.
Still a hard landing but I agree. The bow being the bow was more aerodynamic so it cut through the water. That’s its job so it had a smoother fall down. Hit the sea floor hard but compared to the bow that was flailing around, it was more elegant
For a school presentation my son chose the Titanc. As a model kit maker he pleased me to made the ship in different scale. I made one in 1:1200 in one piece, only the chimneys around at the bottom of the ocean. The kids told me that i am wrong, cause it broke in two. I said "Yes, but this was the way people thought she looked like until Sep. 1, 1985!
The stern was not "full of air" and certainly didn't "implode," air getting forced out and replaced with water is what caused it to sink, it's not like the stern was air tight. True there were no doubt pockets of air that could have caused mini implosion, but nothing to cause the severe damage of the stern section. Hydrodynamic forces wrenched apart the stern as it cascaded to the bottom. It wasn't arrow-shaped like the bow, it didn't cut through the water on the way down.
I understand that as much as well, a great example of air being rushed out of a ship even through open port holes near the surface was the sinking of the Oceanos.
Honestly, this soundtrack is perfect. Usually it's something tragic, or there's no music and it's just groaning and crashing metal echoing through the deep. This is kind of upbeat, and it staves off the thalassophobia.
I've always wondered if you were there at the wreck site, how loud it would be when the bow collides with the seafloor. The sheer concussion must've been absolutely insane
The bronze propellers and the telemotor from the wheelhouse could potentially lasts hundreds of years if not longer. Only a few metals can withstand the corrosive forces of the sea. Bronze is 1, gold is another.
In 2001 Cameron discovered in the wreck way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) an upright wash stand (that faced foward towards the bow) with a carafe and glass still in place on shelves. So if the bow took such a steep angle 0:12 going to the bottom, how then did these objects not tumble off their shelves? The shelves had guard rails to keep the objects in place however they were of insufficient height particularly for the higher up carafe.
Not a scientist, but possibly since the bow filled slowly and was full of water at the time of the sinking, the water pressure kept everything stable on the way down.
@@joshmesser1898 Yes, but I think @Garsons-oq4lh is referring to the impact. Based on most models, the impact would have jarred everything loose and knocked everything over. I don't know the answer, just trying to hopefully clarify. If I got it wrong, I apologize.
so generally seagoing ships have things to prevent stuff from tumbling around in rough waters. the particular glass you're talking about used to have a wooden trim around to to hold it in place, but it has rotted away between then and when it was discovered. the same trim is visible on pictures of olympic's fixtures.
@@subadanus6310Yes there were trims but there was also a carafe on the higher shelf (the glass below it). They were both perfectly in place so no way the bow took the angle it did at 0:12 .
Titanic's bow certainly didn't swing down. There's no force acting on it that would cause it to do so, and its center of gravity is aft of its midpoint. All physical model tests show the bow flutters down like a lead in the wind. The boilers are still in their seats and most furnishings inside are still upright. It's clear the bow fell at a shallow angle and fluttered down. It didn't do the James Cameron dive bomb maneuver.
In the real world, pressure differential is the driving force behind an implosion. The stern implosion theory ignores real world facts. The stern could never have imploded as the pressure would have had escape routes and then what air was left would have eventually equalized or the air would have "fizzled" out through the water like in a carbonated drink. The mass damage was caused by hydrodynamic forces as it fell and then, after being weakened by losing so much of the internal and external structure in it's fall, it collapsed further when it struck the bottom.
@@sabrinashelton1997 Por supuesto que sí !! ..Los hombres que trabajaban en la sala de máquinas haciendo que el Titanic siga con las luces encendidas,las personas de 3 clase que se perdieron en los laberintos del barco!! Todos ellos se hundieron hasta el fondo .
Actualy at that time nobody would have been in the engine room they probably was outside helping with the lifeboats and the 3rd class wasnt locked up like in the movie they just took a long time to get up on deck since they dont open the gates unless its an emergency and they didnt think it was an emergency untill it was atleast 40+ mins after the collision
@@ricemmanuelledimaapi5980 Deberías leer un poco más de historia,el oficial Murdoch ordenó cerrar las compuertas al momento de la colisión para evitar que los compartimentos estancos se llenen de agua ,aún quedaban muchos trabajadores dentro de la sala de máquinas para despresurizar las calderas si no el Titanic podía explosionar debido al vapor acumulado,además los ingenieros eléctricos se quedaron en las entrañas del barco para que aún haya electricidad!!!
Bridge was already gone before the bow went under completely. It was smashed by the forward stack, and so was the leading edge of the bridge wing and it was bent out forward.
Fun Fact It Took Over 2 Hours And 40 Minutes To Make Titanic To Split So Why She Did Split In Half Will After The Titanic Hit The Iceberg And Her Lights Went Out Within 20 Minutes After The Collision At 2:20 A:M EST She Split In Half The Titanic Bow Went Down Underwater First Her Descent Was 40 Minutes Minutes Later Her Stern Went Underwater Within 40 Minutes And Then 20 Minutes Later The Titanic Bow Hit The Ocean Sea Floor And 40 Minutes Later Her Stern Also Hit The Ocean Sea Floor Taking The Lives Of Over 100 Passengers Onboard The RMS Titanic RIP To All Those Lost Their Lives On April 14th 1912 😔🕯️😢😥🫡🚢🪦
And to think something so massive and huge, strong and fresh off the drydock, could be broken up and blown apart in such a way. It fails to register for me
The stern remained attached for most of the way down crushing/smashing everything at the breach. No one actually saw the thing separate and watch the front half drop away ,,,,,it was under water. But loud sounds were heard when it bent and the stern part settled back down momentarily. That must have been the decks ripping apart down to the bottom and keel. Making a serious100' wide hinge bending wildly. The notion of implosion is stupid.
Hi TornadoHarry, I have a question - What are your thoughts on new (But ongoing) research which suggests Boat 10 left at 2:08 - 2:09 - later than previously thought? I agree with it as it explains Frank Evans and Edward Buley’s accounts. Great video aswell btw, keep up the great work :)
when I read that the Titanic split in half when she went under and that people didn't believe it until it waas found, I thought to myself, no way could any huge ship like that could NOT split in 2 (or more)would be impossible for it not to have split into two on the way down. Question did any other ship that sank, go down in one piece?
There were conflicting accounts by survivors. Some said it split, others said it didn't. It boils down mainly to the fact that it happened in pitch black conditions, as well as the fact that eyewitness testimonies are not infallible. As for your question: Titanic is a bit of an anomaly. Very few ships sink bow/stern first, and usually tend to capsize instead. As for the hows and whys behind the split, Mike Brady of Oceanliner Designs made a really comprehensive video behind that, I couldn't recommend it more if you're interested in the topic.
Although bodies would not be found at the wreck sites- crustaceans ate the remains right down to the bones… scattered among the debris field, pairs of shoes would be found… the way they landed in the seafloor suggesting they were the last resting place of a victim of the sinking
the ones who weren't wearing lifebelts like Jack Dawson wasn't wearing one but was hanging on the wooden archway (NOT a cabin door 🚫) and then Rose let go of his hands and he descended to the abyss of the Atlantic 🥺
a bit of info: the bow went down smoothly no implosions but the stern imploded 2-3 time before coming to rest on the bottom ( but I could be mistaken on that because I don't know much about when happened on that day cause I was born 72 years later so I might be wrong?)
Are you sure it was an implosion? And not the hydrodynamic forces that stripped the gaping section away. I figured all of the air was already pushed out at the surface. especially since there are massive areas in the ship where the division of spaces was wood not metal
pretty close rendering , the stern was actually spiraling a bit faster , when it hit the sea floor it left a long skid mark off to one side, detailed imagery has shown this , , , that aside i love this video and the greenish blue sea water , very eerie indeed
don't think that the stern would have collapsed apart like that the moment she impacted the sea floor. I think the fact that she was full of air, and with the implosion, most of her damage to the stern occurred during that time including the peel back of the poop deck. Also the two towers may have imploded apart at that time as well. I do know that there is some vague survivor testimonies that seems to indicate that the towers did come apart at the surface but I would imagine most of it would have managed to stay together until the implosion. I would also imagine that the implosion happened much further down, (and I'm just estimating here but I would have to say about a mile or so). Also, I know that they are saying the mast may have whipped around and destroyed the bridge but I just don't think that looks correct. The bridge may have taken damage when the masked collapsed but I would like to see what evidence they have to support that the mast whipped around like that. I see no reason why the superstructure of the bridge couldn't have come apart naturally as it descended.
No because the bow was fully flooded and any air pockets would have been pushed out of the stern as it sank. The stern wasn't a pressure vessel it had plenty of holes for air to escape from portholes to massive ventilation systems. Check out Oceanliner Designs' video "What Happened To TItanic's Stern" if you want to know more.
i hope those propellers, once the ship has eroded, will be recovered, it’d be a shame to let them rot and eventually, probably, be lost to time as the ship fully disappears.
Yeah, but there’s plenty of people who want nothing more to be taken from the wreck since it’s considered a gravesite, and it’s not like we don’t already have the whistle, the bell, the Big Piece, and other symbolic relics recovered already.
@@mrviking2mcall212 Titanic isn’t really a gravesite, most of those people died in the water afterwsrds and sank down over time, not to mention that basically evrrything and everywhere is a gravesite, someone has died probably everywhere at this point. And wouldn’t it be nice to save one of the most iconic things from the ship that would probably be in the best condition to raise without damaging it?
I reckon they would be the last thing ever recovered since removing them anytime soon will completely destroy what's left of the stern section. Waiting until the stern finally folds in on itself or just disintegrates is the right thing to do
@@McLarenMercedes Every single compartment and room in the whole ship was vented and had several openings for piping and wires, the cargo holds could not be considered sealed in the slightest. What comes closest to the definition would be the refrigeration area, but even that space was built to be airtight, not watertight. Several structrues would have collapsed even at the slightest rising pressure, there is just no possibility for a big enough pressure differential. The only structure physically able to implode (at least if partially or totally empty) would be the freshwater tanks, but even if they did they couldn't rip apart the stern.
La proa que se hundió primero y gracias a sus propiedades hidrodinámicas tardó aproximadamente diez minutos enteros en golpear el fondo. La popa, sin ser hidrodinámica y cayendo en una espiral caótica en lugar de en línea recta cortando el agua demoró unos 37 minutos.
2:37 Animations always show cargo hatch 1 hitting the crane on the prow of the ship causing it to face forward but is there actual proof that happened? surely it makes more sense that the force of hitting the floor spun it around. Genuinly asking if anyone knows lol
@@RaccoonKCD the hatch doesnt hit the crane in this animation, it's just the perspective. The force of the water moving down and forward would have snapped the crane
It's a bit weird, but I loose all interest for the Titanic as soon as she sinks below the surface. To me, looking at her wreck is so sad and depressing. It's a bit cringe to phrase it like that but I don't want to remember the Titanic as a pile of iron rotting at the bottom of the atlantic.
I know I’m wrong in a lot of people’s books but I say raise or raise as much her as possible before the props are the only thing left. Hopefully we have the tech to do it some day soon
@@SudrianTales she won’t be there forever in been over 100 years an all the misinformation has already gotten to stupid heights and will only get worse. Another 100 years shel be gone and that stupid “the titanic is actually the Olympic” theory might become fact. I’m also not of the opinion that the ship is a grave yard. The debris field maybe…MAYBE could be one but the bodies are long gone and people died on the surface of the water anyway. Also since when did been a grave stop archaeologist in Egypt anyway? It is what it is. If she was in better shape and no where near as deep I’d say leave her but in order to find out everything and remember the victims raising or pulling as much up as possible is the only way to go. I used to be firmly on team “leave her there” but I don’t think people appreciate the fact that she is now truly dying.
@@keetahbrough no it isn’t. Wheres the bodies? Where do most people die? The surface might be a grave site but that’s it. If you have a cry about titanic you should also have a cry about the pyramids
If you're having a hard time viewing the video, I would turn up the resolution of the video. TH-cam likes to compress the video quality unless it is as the maximum resolution. Thank you all for the support!
If we had the technology back then to see this happening underwater I'm sure it would be pretty chaotic to see and scary at the same time watching a ship rip and tear itself apart as it falls to the bottom of the ocean with relentless force.
Hey, I have a question, where do you get the metal strain sound effects from?
@@DC10_AV i like to know that one myself.
The visuals of such a massive ship being absolutely dwarfed by the seemingly bottomless descent is very unsettling
It would make a cool lamp
Feeds into my Thalassophobia. I’m not afraid of the ocean itself, but it’s massive size and who knows what’s hiding in there. Even if we mapped out the whole sea floor you can’t do it all at once and even if you could there’s an atmosphere above you that is filled with creatures.
Who knows what we haven’t found yet down there?
@@LordWyatt it’s cool like that
@@Stem_Cieoh I agree, but I’m the kind of person who’d watch it onscreen from a mountaintop.
I had similar thoughts.....as big as the Titanic was for its time ....1912....it's a mere micro-spec compared to the size of the ocean/oceans!!!
badabing badaboom, that's what we're looking for
Someone here is watching too many documentaries 🙄
I thought it was I'm blue da ba dee da ba die I'm blue da ba dee da ba die
@@Bbc418or not enough...
I always think of that documentary too lol
Anyone who gets this reference is a certified nerd
It's fascinating that, amidst all that pressure and destruction, there are still drinking glasses upright in the wreck that look as they were left on the surface.
Why would drinking glasses be affected by pressure? I assume you mean the water pressure and it's only deadly when there's a huge difference between the inner pressure of say a contained space such as inside a submarine (often closer to 1 atmosphere) and the ever increasing outer pressure (striving to fill that void). If the inner pressure is the same as the outer pressure then saturation divers can enter a diving bell, close it, raise the pressure (gradually and slowly of course) to the level of the depth they will be diving/working at, lower the diving bell and open the bottom hatch and exit the diving bell.
A glass however has no cavities and as it fills with water there's no pressure difference for there is no contained space with surface level pressure.
This is obvious in regards to the different conditions of the bow and stern part of the wreck. Almost all of the bow section was already filled with water when it plunged below the surface and hence there were no air-pockets/contained space to give in to the outer pressure forces. The stern section however had a cargo hold which had been shut and this became a contained space with surface level pressure. As the stern sank ever deeper the pressure gradient on this space increased until it violently imploded leaving the stern a twisted mess.
As for the destruction. Well, it wasn't spread evenly all over the superstructure of the ship once it hit the bottom. Some parts took the brunt of the forces. Others experienced minor forces. Hence why some of the glasses are intact. Air disaster investigators find several intact objects where planes have crashed at high speed with no survivors.
I'm fairly certain that what is still somewhat intact is found in the bow section of the wreck.
I wonder how long someone lucky enough (or unlucky) to have found an air pocket in the stern would survive before the implosion?
@@McLarenMercedesThe glass and carafe were found way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) on an upright wash stand on shelves that would've had guard rails. But no way the higher up heavier carafe would have stayed in place if the bow took such a steep angle at 0:12. Also, the stand faced forward toward the bow so no way.
@@DavidWilliams-so2dyI heard it imploded after 10-30 seconds underwater
@@DavidWilliams-so2dyin reality i dont think there was an implosion. Implosion’s generally happen when a water and air tight container is no longer strong enough to hold out the pressure outside. Titanic’s stern wouldnt have been 100% air tight (even in air pockets). I’ve read (dont know for sure its true) that the extreme damage to the stern is all blown outward, not inward like an implosion. The inrush of water being forced into the wreck faster than the air could escape by the accelerated sinking would have blown out any windows and weak areas of the ship and because the stern wasnt stream lined anything that caused drag in the water got torn off. (Im not an expert so dont know for sure what im saying is 100% true or if im explaining it right but i did read something to that effect)
I can't believe you found the ost used for the 2012 sinking animation. I thought I was the only one who thought it was good.
Imagine finding this fucking thing at the bottom of an abysmal ocean. So eerie and amazing.
You wouldn’t, it’s like 1-2 miles under
@@StuyJamaicaYonkers I didn't mean me personally. I was referencing the person that did find it.
@@BucNasT don matter who I was jus sayin
Umm actually it kind of does. People have gone to the physical wreck. So to say no one can is false
@StuyJamaicaYonkers It was obviously amazing for the one's who found it
RIP to all the poor souls lost that night. 🙏
Such a tragic ending for a ship that was built for greatness.
Built for greatness and destroyed by ego and stupidity.
@@jesslambert4819 If by "destroyed by ego and stupidity," you mean that Titanic was believed to be unsinkable and the crew was careless, I'm afraid to inform you that is incorrect. Titanic was never called unsinkable, but "practically unsinkable" (in other words, nearly unsinkable). Also, she wasn't the only ship referred to as such. Cunard Line's R.M.S Lusitania was also dubbed practically unsinkable, and she sank after being torpedoed during WWI. This was during a time when almost everyone was incredibly confident in maritime safety, and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster.
As for Titanic's crew, they were some of the best at sea during the time. It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night, as he wasn't alive to defend himself at the inquiries. However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security.
To OP.
What "greatness" ?
The Cunard Liners Mauretania and Lusitania were *faster* (and more profitable) and the Olympic class liners which White Star Line built lost the record of the world's largest ship in 1913 already to the German ocean liner SS Imperator and its slightly larger sister ship SS Vaterland. After them ever larger and faster ocean liners were launched.
When it came to luxury the ocean liners improved upon that pretty much yearly as more modern and technically superior ships emerged. RMS Aquitania launched in 1913 had much emphasis on luxury in an effort by Cunard to beat White Star Line there too. She was much loved by her passengers who called her "the Ship Beautiful". And she served *both* in WWI and WWII.
White Star Line struggled economically even before the Olympic Class liners were launched and once motorships (diesel-electric and steam-turbines) appeared in the 1930's the old coal-burned ocean liners which were manually fed with coal instantly became *outdated* . Hence why those who still were around were scrapped in the 1930's. Coal was no longer easily available (hence spiraling costs) not to mention that coal needs large and bulky coal bunkers. Fact is they were so huge they took up 1/6th of the total cargo of any coal-burning ship. Motorships don't need a huge labor force feeding coal manually either.
No, heres the harsh reality: Titanic is remembered *because* she sank and a lot of people died on her maiden voyage. But had she never sunk and missed the iceberg? She would have gone down as a footnote in shipping history. On her own she wouldn't have stood out. The *sinking* made her immortal.
I reiterate: The Cunard Liners held the Blue RIband and were faster and more profitable (and shipping lines are ultimate in it for the *business* ). Larger, more technically advanced and luxurious ships were constantly being designed and built.
So unless Titanic would have served with distinction during WWI as a hospital or troop carrying ship I can't see any greatness being in her future. Certainly not in a way which sets her out from the other ocean liners.
Assertions backed up by nothing valid or without historical scope is a myopic outlook on anything, never mind famous disasters.
@@theminingassassin16 "It's unknown why Captain Smith had his ship moving at full speed through an icefield that night" Not quite true. Titanic had received several warnings from other ships about icebergs which had been spotted. During the inquiry following the disaster it emerged that Captain Smith had intended to go around the area with the ice which would have resulted in a minor detour. Captain Smith informed Bruce Ismay of this who realized that this would mean that Titanic would arrive in New York several hours late. In fact it would most likely arrive at port late in the evening.
This didn't sit well with Ismay at all. How so? If Titanic arrived late in the evening it would be dark and nobody would witness the ship arriving except for the dock workers. Ismay wanted all the headlines and he wouldn't get those if everybody in New York had already gone to bed. Even worse was that all the passengers would be ready to go to sleep as well and therefore would be eager to get off the ship as soon as possible and hurry to their homes, hotels or in the case of the many immigrants the processing station at Ellis Island. *Nobody* likes to finish a travel late in the evening or at night. It's not so strange that late night flights are cheaper today.
The press would most certainly not turn up either, hence no great headline in the newspapers.
But if Titanic maintained its course it would arrive in New York during the day and people and the press would gather to see her. This of course meant going through an area they *all knew* had several icebergs. This decision was Captain Smith's but Bruce Ismay, the company president, exerted pressure on the captain to do so. Since the captain has the final say on his ship he was blamed and Bruce Ismay let off lightly. Most however knew *he* was the real reason this decision was taken in the first place.
Another factor to consider is that Titanic was *already* delayed and late as her maiden voyage had been postponed due to the Olympic colliding with HMS Hawke and needed urgent repairs. The 1912 Coal strike also meant that there was a shortage of coal and White Star Line had to reroute the deliveries allocated to their other ships so that Titanic could have enough for her maiden voyage. This also meant that these White Star liners had to stay in harbor and their voyages were postponed. Some passengers however got rebooked on the Titanic...
Another mishap which might have ended so much worse is when Titanic steamed out of Southampton. The ship City of New York snapped her moorings as Titanic passed and nearly collided with her. Fortunately a quick-thinking thug saw what was happening and prevented a minor disaster.
So the maiden voyage delayed be almost a month, coal worker strike leading to cancelled journeys for other White Star ships and the near collision with the ship City of New York were already too many delays and bad news for Ismay. He felt that he could ill-afford another fiasco. The ship arriving delayed by half a day therefore wasn't an alternative Ismay was willing to accept.
Yet another factors influencing Ismay's decision was that White Star Line had economical difficulties before they built the Olympic Class liners and gambled on them becoming huge successes. Titanic's maiden voyage had to be resounding success.
This ship did also NOT go at full speed that night. Not all of the boilers were lit for starters. And what kind of a captain and crew would push a brand-new ship at top speed anyway? New ships have to be broken in first. Same a new cars or any new equipment. Full speed also burns a lot of coal and Titanic was short on it anyway following the strike. High speed is correct but Titanic wasn't going full speed ahead.
"and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster" Really?
You know White Star Line alone had lost 4 ships before the Titanic...
Atlantic sank in 1873. 562 people died.
Naronic was a cargo and livestock ship that disappeared in 1893 while sailing from Liverpool to New York. To this day it is uncertain what happened to Naronic.
Suevic sank in 1907.
Republic (II), sailing from New York to the Mediterranean, in heavy fog, was smashed into by another ship, causing Republic to slowly sink in 1909. On 24 January, Republic sank stern first; at 15,378 tons, she was the largest ship to have sunk until then.
Shipping disasters werent unusual in the early 1900's...
Examples (all a few years before Titanic)
1902 Camorta - The ship was caught in a cyclone and sank in the Irrawaddy Delta on 6 May with the loss of all 655 passengers and 82 crew.
1904 General Slocum - The paddle steamer caught fire and sank in New York City's East River on 15 June. 1,029 people were killed, making it New York City's greatest loss of life until the September 11 attacks.
1904 Norge - On 28 June the ship ran aground on Helen's Reef near Rockall. 635 people were killed; 160 survivors spent as much as eight days in open boats before rescue.
1906 Sirio - On 4 August the cargo steamship sank after running aground and suffered a boiler explosion on the Punta Hormigas, a reef off Hormigas Island, two and a half miles east of Cape Palos, Cartagena, Spain. 293, including Italian and Spanish emigrants bound for Argentina, of the 645 aboard were lost. Other sources put the death toll at over 500.
1909 Waratah - About 27 July, the steamship, en route from Australia to London, was lost without trace off Durban on the east coast of South Africa. All 211 aboard were lost.
Naming but a few...
"and the Titanic's sinking made people realize that ocean liners weren't immune to disaster"
Given the light of the other disasters I find that statement hard to believe.
"However, I believe it was because the ocean's calm conditions led him into a false sense of security." 1. He knew there were icebergs in the area.
2. He listened to Ismay's advice of arriving in New York on time to avoid more bad headlines or lack of headlines at all.
3. Captain Smith was a veteran from an era in which disaster were common. What false sense of security could he possibly have had with his experience?
He gambled and rolled the dice believing any iceberg wuld be spotted in time...
Please verify all the sunken ships I bring up here.
To person with Mercedes in their name:
Think what you want , but this is how I see it. Olympic and Titanic were considered groundbreaking when they were put into service, and their luxury was well received by passengers. Also, they weren’t made to be faster than Cunard’s Greyhound class. In fact, no ship would beat Mauretania’s speed record until around 20 years after she got the Blue Riband from Lusitania. White Star Line knew they couldn’t beat the speed record, so they focused on everything else, and I feel like they did it very well. Also, the German ships were built to be larger than the Olympic class because that was the name of the game when it came to building ships during the time. One company would do something, and then everyone else would try to top it. I would also like to point out that if Britannic was completed and put into service as she was intended, she would have likely been able to rival other ships of that generation in luxury. People also remember Olympic for being one of the greatest ships of her time, and I feel like Titanic would have been the same if she didn’t sink. Maybe she wouldn’t have reached the same level of fame, but I think she would have been close. Also, I don’t see how WSL’s financial situation has anything to do with Titanic’s demise. Finally, Olympic, along with many other ships like Vaterland (renamed Leviathan when she was taken by the Americans after the war) was refitted with new boilers that burned oil instead of coal after WWI, so I think you may have been mistaken on that point.
It's quite haunting to know that in hundreds of years, people will only ever recognize wreck by it's propellers and be left wondering how it was once attached to a giant Ocean Liner.
Honestly they should save the propellers I feel they are worth salvaging
@@ianloeb1672they most defiantly will be
I can only assume their waiting for them to naturally detach from the ship because they would be incredibly difficult
To remove
That music just... fits this somehow. It really drives home how stressful and terrifying it was in the victim's final moments. Fantastic choice! I really hope I get over my fear of shipwrecks someday so I can watch more detailed videos of the wreck.
Imagen being a fish swimming having a good time and suddenly this big thing comes crashing down through the darkness.^^*
New house
@@Ashtondaboi918 City* ;P
@@00Kuja00 Yeah and the stern is another city for the fish.
@@Ashtondaboi918 Kinda cute, in a morbid sort of way.
This is the best clip that I've ever seen of the sinking, It gives you an idea of just how deep the Atlantic really is and how insignificant she really is. Its amazing that it stayed as intact as she did given the forces involved
It is amazing how much more intact military ships are on the bottom even with heavy battle damage. It shows just how much tougher they are constructed.
The actual impacts on the bow and stern were actually extremely in depth great job honestly a huge loss of 1,500 passengers and a great Captain and the ways the survivors lives were impacted. I hope that the ones who survived who have since passed get to see their loved ones again.
I, personally, have always thought about this part of the event. So it's cool that someone is focusing on it. Good job. 😉
I wouldn’t necessarily say ‘like a stone’ she went down (her bow at least) very elegantly like you very beautifully portrayed.
Yes, the bow didn’t fall vertically straight downward, but glided slightly forward as well as down. The stern did fall straight down, but whirled around like a sycamore seed as it did so.
I think it was more the idea she “sank like a stone” because she was a heavy bitch and did just drop, nothing to slow nor stop her descent til she reached the ocean floor.
Still a hard landing but I agree. The bow being the bow was more aerodynamic so it cut through the water. That’s its job so it had a smoother fall down. Hit the sea floor hard but compared to the bow that was flailing around, it was more elegant
For a school presentation my son chose the Titanc.
As a model kit maker he pleased me to made the ship in different scale.
I made one in 1:1200 in one piece, only the chimneys around at the bottom of the ocean.
The kids told me that i am wrong, cause it broke in two.
I said "Yes, but this was the way people thought she looked like until Sep. 1, 1985!
Why are you doing your son’s homework for him?
The stern was not "full of air" and certainly didn't "implode," air getting forced out and replaced with water is what caused it to sink, it's not like the stern was air tight. True there were no doubt pockets of air that could have caused mini implosion, but nothing to cause the severe damage of the stern section.
Hydrodynamic forces wrenched apart the stern as it cascaded to the bottom. It wasn't arrow-shaped like the bow, it didn't cut through the water on the way down.
I understand that as much as well, a great example of air being rushed out of a ship even through open port holes near the surface was the sinking of the Oceanos.
There were about 700 or so people who stated that the Titanic imploded when the bow was submerged🤷♀️ At those depths it would implode regardless
I love the titanic it was the best and you made the sinking of titanic thx it a cool video.
Man casually using the same OST as the documentary, what a boss
The ost sounds like temple music and I like ig
@@Jackr85 it's the ost of inception
Rest In Peace To Those Who Lost Their Lives 💯
God bless to the people that suffered RIP
here before it goes viral
I love you
The amount of folks here that don’t know the difference between an explosion and an implosion is staggering.
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A REAL TIME.
You should do a real time
@@keneniahwilliams4374yeah
WAS THIS COMMENT NECESSARY
@@levyan4718 yes
@@keneniahwilliams4374the descent was the famous film with grottes and monsters 👿
Excellent film, thx
Honestly, this soundtrack is perfect. Usually it's something tragic, or there's no music and it's just groaning and crashing metal echoing through the deep. This is kind of upbeat, and it staves off the thalassophobia.
this is very good i ever seen A deck is pancaked true. in the stern section
I've always wondered if you were there at the wreck site, how loud it would be when the bow collides with the seafloor. The sheer concussion must've been absolutely insane
I always imagined standing on the bottom and watching it come down and hit the seafloor. Yeah, I know: "impossible". But I did say imagined.
0:01-3:56
Bada-bing bada-boom, that’s what we’re looking for.
The bronze propellers and the telemotor from the wheelhouse could potentially lasts hundreds of years if not longer. Only a few metals can withstand the corrosive forces of the sea. Bronze is 1, gold is another.
Excellent video!! . Congratulations!
It's heartbreaking
In 2001 Cameron discovered in the wreck way down on D deck (in cabin D-27) an upright wash stand (that faced foward towards the bow) with a carafe and glass still in place on shelves. So if the bow took such a steep angle 0:12 going to the bottom, how then did these objects not tumble off their shelves? The shelves had guard rails to keep the objects in place however they were of insufficient height particularly for the higher up carafe.
Not a scientist, but possibly since the bow filled slowly and was full of water at the time of the sinking, the water pressure kept everything stable on the way down.
@@joshmesser1898 Yes, but I think @Garsons-oq4lh is referring to the impact. Based on most models, the impact would have jarred everything loose and knocked everything over. I don't know the answer, just trying to hopefully clarify. If I got it wrong, I apologize.
@@joshmesser1898The bow is at such a steep angle here 0:12 that there is no way those objects would've stayed in place.
so generally seagoing ships have things to prevent stuff from tumbling around in rough waters. the particular glass you're talking about used to have a wooden trim around to to hold it in place, but it has rotted away between then and when it was discovered. the same trim is visible on pictures of olympic's fixtures.
@@subadanus6310Yes there were trims but there was also a carafe on the higher shelf (the glass below it). They were both perfectly in place so no way the bow took the angle it did at 0:12 .
With all the Titanic mania always present, I'm surprised that nobody has done this in real time.
There’s a few out there if you search for it
This is only a theory based on educated guesses . No one actually knows how things actually really went down .
I truly hope in my lifetime they have the technology to raise one of the props, or dig out the center 3 bladed one
They will.
Titanic's bow certainly didn't swing down. There's no force acting on it that would cause it to do so, and its center of gravity is aft of its midpoint. All physical model tests show the bow flutters down like a lead in the wind. The boilers are still in their seats and most furnishings inside are still upright. It's clear the bow fell at a shallow angle and fluttered down. It didn't do the James Cameron dive bomb maneuver.
Yes there was. The double bottom hung on for dear life
Nice alternative to the usual videos of this kind 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Excellent video 👍
Just one small point its DR Robert Ballard the emphasis on DR 👍 he's not a huge ego cowboy like james Cameron
In the real world, pressure differential is the driving force behind an implosion. The stern implosion theory ignores real world facts. The stern could never have imploded as the pressure would have had escape routes and then what air was left would have eventually equalized or the air would have "fizzled" out through the water like in a carbonated drink. The mass damage was caused by hydrodynamic forces as it fell and then, after being weakened by losing so much of the internal and external structure in it's fall, it collapsed further when it struck the bottom.
This woukd be more effective if were done just the way it sounded with the ships creaks and groans and no background music.
For as many video accounts of how the Titanic sank, I haven’t found one, on utube😉, that explains WHY IT WAS SUNK….
@@swampfuel20 quick and dirty explanation: it hit an iceberg which opened a bunch of the ship to the water
The first ever human who sailed on an ocean was a madlad, when you think of it.
Imagine being a sea creature with a home on the sea floor when this bad boy comes hurtling above to change your life forever
Y pensar que aún había gente atrapada dentro del barco , sus cuerpos habrán implosionado.
@@sabrinashelton1997 Por supuesto que sí !! ..Los hombres que trabajaban en la sala de máquinas haciendo que el Titanic siga con las luces encendidas,las personas de 3 clase que se perdieron en los laberintos del barco!! Todos ellos se hundieron hasta el fondo .
Actualy at that time nobody would have been in the engine room they probably was outside helping with the lifeboats and the 3rd class wasnt locked up like in the movie they just took a long time to get up on deck since they dont open the gates unless its an emergency and they didnt think it was an emergency untill it was atleast 40+ mins after the collision
@@ricemmanuelledimaapi5980 Deberías leer un poco más de historia,el oficial Murdoch ordenó cerrar las compuertas al momento de la colisión para evitar que los compartimentos estancos se llenen de agua ,aún quedaban muchos trabajadores dentro de la sala de máquinas para despresurizar las calderas si no el Titanic podía explosionar debido al vapor acumulado,además los ingenieros eléctricos se quedaron en las entrañas del barco para que aún haya electricidad!!!
Bridge was already gone before the bow went under completely. It was smashed by the forward stack, and so was the leading edge of the bridge wing and it was bent out forward.
@@050572robert smashed by the mast snapping back. The forward funnel fell to the side not forward
I thought this very realistic and well done. Nice job!😊
It was and the music fit too, watchin it go down with the music like damn, 5⭐️
Crazy to imagine this happened in complete darkness
3:56 is that the no limits 2 splashdown sound?
The fact this was on Roblox is crazy
@@anunordinarycellist this isn't Roblox this is blender
Fun Fact It Took Over 2 Hours And 40 Minutes To Make Titanic To Split So Why She Did Split In Half Will After The Titanic Hit The Iceberg And Her Lights Went Out Within 20 Minutes After The Collision At 2:20 A:M EST She Split In Half The Titanic Bow Went Down Underwater First Her Descent Was 40 Minutes Minutes Later Her Stern Went Underwater Within 40 Minutes And Then 20 Minutes Later The Titanic Bow Hit The Ocean Sea Floor And 40 Minutes Later Her Stern Also Hit The Ocean Sea Floor Taking The Lives Of Over 100 Passengers Onboard The RMS Titanic RIP To All Those Lost Their Lives On April 14th 1912 😔🕯️😢😥🫡🚢🪦
And to think something so massive and huge, strong and fresh off the drydock, could be broken up and blown apart in such a way. It fails to register for me
What's your opinion on Mike Brady saying that the stern didn't implode and that it was the ocean currents?
Crazy to think that the Titanic wasn’t even halfway down to the seabed before the Stern went under…
So cool.
The stern remained attached for most of the way down crushing/smashing everything at the breach.
No one actually saw the thing separate and watch the front half drop away ,,,,,it was under water.
But loud sounds were heard when it bent and the stern part settled back down momentarily.
That must have been the decks ripping apart down to the bottom and keel.
Making a serious100' wide hinge bending wildly.
The notion of implosion is stupid.
A fun fact that is stated in the video: this is half time
Hi TornadoHarry, I have a question -
What are your thoughts on new (But ongoing) research which suggests Boat 10 left at 2:08 - 2:09 - later than previously thought? I agree with it as it explains Frank Evans and Edward Buley’s accounts.
Great video aswell btw, keep up the great work :)
I've been wanting someone to do an animation on this
Makes me wonder if there were any air pockets left and people still alive, during the descent.
I never knew the wreck sank to music.
when I read that the Titanic split in half when she went under and that people didn't believe it until it waas found, I thought to myself, no way could any huge ship like that could NOT split in 2 (or more)would be impossible for it not to have split into two on the way down. Question did any other ship that sank, go down in one piece?
Yeah the Britannic for example, the sister ship, went down in one piece in 1916.
There were conflicting accounts by survivors. Some said it split, others said it didn't. It boils down mainly to the fact that it happened in pitch black conditions, as well as the fact that eyewitness testimonies are not infallible.
As for your question: Titanic is a bit of an anomaly. Very few ships sink bow/stern first, and usually tend to capsize instead. As for the hows and whys behind the split, Mike Brady of Oceanliner Designs made a really comprehensive video behind that, I couldn't recommend it more if you're interested in the topic.
The stern didn't implode, it wasn't airtight.
Nither was the Titian💁♀️
then why does the stern look like a bomb hit it ey?
Thank you for not including that asinine down draft of water.
Thank you for pushing through and still whining even when something doesn't happen.
"Pretty Cool Huh" 😆😅😂🤣
Rainer Dry!
I wonder how she would’ve looked if she were found in 1955 rather than 1985 ?
Closer to how she looked in 1985 than to how she would have looked in 1915. Less rusticles than in 1985, but not no rusticles.
The soundtrack sounds like a no name Mombasa from Inception.
Although bodies would not be found at the wreck sites- crustaceans ate the remains right down to the bones… scattered among the debris field, pairs of shoes would be found… the way they landed in the seafloor suggesting they were the last resting place of a victim of the sinking
the ones who weren't wearing lifebelts like Jack Dawson wasn't wearing one but was hanging on the wooden archway (NOT a cabin door 🚫) and then Rose let go of his hands and he descended to the abyss of the Atlantic 🥺
@@ChairmanPaulieD Jack and Rose are fictional
a bit of info:
the bow went down smoothly no implosions but the stern imploded 2-3 time before coming to rest on the bottom ( but I could be mistaken on that because I don't know much about when happened on that day cause I was born 72 years later so I might be wrong?)
Are you sure it was an implosion? And not the hydrodynamic forces that stripped the gaping section away. I figured all of the air was already pushed out at the surface. especially since there are massive areas in the ship where the division of spaces was wood not metal
pretty close rendering , the stern was actually spiraling a bit faster , when it hit the sea floor it left a long skid mark off to one side, detailed imagery has shown this , , , that aside i love this video and the greenish blue sea water , very eerie indeed
Great work !
Apparently they heard titanic when it hit the bottom of the ocean.
Who?
2:37 Yeah boom, it kind of breaks its back
I'm here before it goes viral
Wow! Nice animation for making how Titanic wen’t underwater.
wow good job
don't think that the stern would have collapsed
apart like that the moment she impacted the sea floor. I think the fact that she was full of air, and with the implosion, most of her damage to the stern occurred during that time including the peel back of the poop deck. Also the two towers may have imploded apart at that time as well. I do know that there is some vague survivor testimonies that seems to indicate that the towers did come apart at the surface but I would imagine most of it would have managed to stay together until the implosion. I would also imagine that the implosion happened much further down, (and I'm just estimating here but I would have to say about a mile or so). Also, I know that they are saying the mast may have whipped around and destroyed the bridge but I just don't think that looks correct. The bridge may have taken damage when the masked collapsed but I would like to see what evidence they have to support that the mast whipped around like that. I see no reason why the superstructure of the bridge couldn't have come apart naturally as it descended.
Faster than me when I have to shower
Can you please make a video on the deepest wreck to date USS Samuel B. Roberts, which sank at a depth of 22,621 ft (6894m)
VERY NICELY DONE!!!
imagine the grip
Is it possible for anyone to have survived in a pocket of air as the ship sank to the bottom? I think it wouldn't be possible.
No because the bow was fully flooded and any air pockets would have been pushed out of the stern as it sank. The stern wasn't a pressure vessel it had plenty of holes for air to escape from portholes to massive ventilation systems. Check out Oceanliner Designs' video "What Happened To TItanic's Stern" if you want to know more.
More accurate than James Cameron version, great job
More accurate than your name,stop hating on Cameron version 1:37
@@jamesfracasse8178yo shut up, bro was making a complement
James, it literally is.
@@jamesfracasse8178 I love James Cameron but truth is truth, now we know more information about brakeup and decent to the bottom
I don't think the stern stood straight up in the air like this one still shows.
Do you think if everyone was completely silent at the surface when the bow hit, they could have heard it?
Nah, water was way too deep to hear anything
@@thestonedabbot9551way too deep
No, but people did hear the stern imploding
@@TornadoHarry I believe that
i hope those propellers, once the ship has eroded, will be recovered, it’d be a shame to let them rot and eventually, probably, be lost to time as the ship fully disappears.
Yeah, but there’s plenty of people who want nothing more to be taken from the wreck since it’s considered a gravesite, and it’s not like we don’t already have the whistle, the bell, the Big Piece, and other symbolic relics recovered already.
@@mrviking2mcall212 Titanic isn’t really a gravesite, most of those people died in the water afterwsrds and sank down over time, not to mention that basically evrrything and everywhere is a gravesite, someone has died probably everywhere at this point.
And wouldn’t it be nice to save one of the most iconic things from the ship that would probably be in the best condition to raise without damaging it?
@@sp1n4l_sn4p I never said *I* agreed with the gravesite sentiment.
@@mrviking2mcall212 im giving my argument against it since that is the reason why people dont want things removed, as you said in your statement.
I reckon they would be the last thing ever recovered since removing them anytime soon will completely destroy what's left of the stern section. Waiting until the stern finally folds in on itself or just disintegrates is the right thing to do
The stern did NOT implode, it's physically impossible as it is no sealed/watertight vessel at that moment!
The cargo hold in the stern WAS a sealed compartment. What happens when outside pressure wants to occupy an area with lower pressure...
Implosion.
@@McLarenMercedes Every single compartment and room in the whole ship was vented and had several openings for piping and wires, the cargo holds could not be considered sealed in the slightest. What comes closest to the definition would be the refrigeration area, but even that space was built to be airtight, not watertight.
Several structrues would have collapsed even at the slightest rising pressure, there is just no possibility for a big enough pressure differential. The only structure physically able to implode (at least if partially or totally empty) would be the freshwater tanks, but even if they did they couldn't rip apart the stern.
Realmente cuanto duro en llegar hasta el fondo??
La proa que se hundió primero y gracias a sus propiedades hidrodinámicas tardó aproximadamente diez minutos enteros en golpear el fondo. La popa, sin ser hidrodinámica y cayendo en una espiral caótica en lugar de en línea recta cortando el agua demoró unos 37 minutos.
¿De dónde vienen los 37 minutos tan exactos?@@LeicaFleury
Ok kids, how fast was ship travelling under water?
@@peteranserin3708 6.4 meters a second
Wonder what would happen if Titanic's engines were able to be salvaged and fell into the hands of WhistlinDiesel!
Tie an anchor to WD and send him down to find out.
This is awesome can I use this video or this scene I'll credit you at the end
oh well ships eh!😂
Cool
Could have taken out several minutes and this video would have been much better.
2:37 Animations always show cargo hatch 1 hitting the crane on the prow of the ship causing it to face forward but is there actual proof that happened? surely it makes more sense that the force of hitting the floor spun it around. Genuinly asking if anyone knows lol
@@RaccoonKCD the hatch doesnt hit the crane in this animation, it's just the perspective. The force of the water moving down and forward would have snapped the crane
After careful examining of both bow and stern sections I find this historically inaccurate and I have been examining it since it was found.
Well, do a video with your findings..
It's a bit weird, but I loose all interest for the Titanic as soon as she sinks below the surface. To me, looking at her wreck is so sad and depressing. It's a bit cringe to phrase it like that but I don't want to remember the Titanic as a pile of iron rotting at the bottom of the atlantic.
A real time descent would be interesting
Pretty cool huh?
"Thank you for that fine forensic analysis Mr. Bodine" 😆😅😂🤣
I know I’m wrong in a lot of people’s books but I say raise or raise as much her as possible before the props are the only thing left. Hopefully we have the tech to do it some day soon
Why?
@@SudrianTales she won’t be there forever in been over 100 years an all the misinformation has already gotten to stupid heights and will only get worse. Another 100 years shel be gone and that stupid “the titanic is actually the Olympic” theory might become fact. I’m also not of the opinion that the ship is a grave yard. The debris field maybe…MAYBE could be one but the bodies are long gone and people died on the surface of the water anyway. Also since when did been a grave stop archaeologist in Egypt anyway? It is what it is. If she was in better shape and no where near as deep I’d say leave her but in order to find out everything and remember the victims raising or pulling as much up as possible is the only way to go. I used to be firmly on team “leave her there” but I don’t think people appreciate the fact that she is now truly dying.
it's a fkn gravessite, stop. ya don't dig up gravesites.
@@keetahbrough no it isn’t. Wheres the bodies? Where do most people die? The surface might be a grave site but that’s it. If you have a cry about titanic you should also have a cry about the pyramids
Why did i think it was roblox