I guess 410 is a unlucky number, the 410 Edsel engine was also a one-year wonder. The 410 engine was easy to produce, It was just a 390 block with a 428 Crank, the only thing special was the pistons with the right deck height.
Thanks for your comment, @mylanmiller9656 You’re absolutely right-the 410 engine was a one-year wonder and a fascinating piece of muscle car history. Edsel’s 410, a quick modification of the 390 block with a 428 crank, was indeed easy to produce. Those unique pistons for the right deck height really gave it character, but unfortunately, it didn’t stick around long enough to leave a massive legacy. However, that’s what makes it a hidden gem for true enthusiasts The 410 reminds us of how experimental and innovative Ford was during the muscle car golden age, always pushing boundaries with power and performance. What’s your favorite one-year wonder engine or model? Let us know in the comments.... Everyone, don't forget to subscribe, like, and share the passion for American Muscle Cars with others who love these incredible machines. Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas to you and all the car lovers out there
@@MuscleCarMasters68 You forgot the EDSEL 410 engine was not a FE. It was a MEL engine with a 430 Crank and a Special small-bore block. It was only in the large Mercury based Edsel, that was canceled at the end of the 1958 run.
@@mylanmiller9656 Thanks for your comment, @mylanmiller9656 the Edsel 410 was part of the MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, not the FE series, and it’s one of those engines that doesn’t get enough love. With its unique small-bore block and that 430 crank, it was built for the bigger Mercury-based Edsels, giving them solid torque and performance. Sadly, as you mentioned, it was short-lived, disappearing after the 1958 model year. But that’s what makes it special-an underrated powerhouse that only true enthusiasts recognize and appreciate have a good day... waiting for your more information of Edsel 410 engine.
Nah, I’d call the 410 a hidden gem! Sure, it’s a 390 block with a 428 crank, but that combo gave it a unique personality. Plus, the Edsel 410 was part of Ford’s experimental phase, paving the way for legendary engines.
I recall the MEL 410 was supposed to debut in 1957 with the Mercury Turnpike Cruiser. Production issues delayed it until 1958, taking away any fanfare, placing it between the ho hum 383 and the livelier 430.
The Park Lane with the 410 is a rare gem, but it reminds me of the Fairlane V8 aka the 221 Windsor. It only lasted from '62 to May '63. Rare cars like yours always stand out...
You’re absolutely correct I forgot about the 221 in my reply to Cookezachery i helped a guy install one in a 63 fairlane and got it running for him in exchange for the 59 meteor I had bought and sold years ago that 221 is a heck of a good engine!
the Park Lane 410, it’s a rare gem and a true nod to Ford’s bold engineering The Fairlane V8 (221 Windsor) was another short-lived but iconic piece of history, laying the groundwork for Ford’s legendary small-block engines. These rare classics, like the 410, always grab attention for their unique charm and incredible performance. What do you think makes these rare Ford V8s so unforgettable? Share your thoughts below Don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters, share the channel with fellow fans, and keep the muscle car legacy alive. Have a great weekend and a Merry Christmas
@roberthaygarth8525 That’s an awesome story, Robert The 221 was indeed a groundbreaking engine-the first of the legendary Ford small-block family, setting the stage for the iconic 289 and 302. In a ’63 Fairlane, it must’ve roared with style and power! And trading for a ’59 Meteor? That’s some serious classic car hustle-love it! These stories remind us why we’re all here, celebrating these machines. Muscle car fans, drop your favorite engine swap stories in the comments Let’s keep this community revved up-don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters. Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
@@roberthaygarth8525 The 221 Windsor was solid for its time, no doubt, but let's be real-it was quickly outclassed. Ford's focus shifted to bigger and better engines like the 289, which set the foundation for the small-block legacy. The 221 paved the way, sure, but it wasn’t built to dominate like the beasts that followed.
@@KeithGreene-k1v ; The 289 Hi-Po debuted in the 1963 Fairlane Sports Coupe. Love the 57" T-Bird fins and tail lights on the 63". Funny thing though, they hadn't yet made accomodations for dual exhaust.
I built a 410 out of a 73 390 block with 406 heads, a high flow edelbrock intake, and a 750 CFM carb. add in a better cam and headers, and let me tell you, that motor turned my f250 into a torque monster.
Wow, what an absolute beast you’ve built! Using a ’73 390 block, 406 heads, and that high-flow Edelbrock intake is a recipe for pure torque. Pairing it with a 750 CFM carb, upgraded cam, and headers must have transformed your F250 into a true torque monster-sounds like it’s ready to rip up any road or trail! It’s builds like yours that keep the American muscle spirit alive, showcasing creativity, ingenuity, and raw power. To all American muscle car fans out there: what’s your dream build, or what have you already built? Let’s hear your stories in the comments...Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel to dive deeper into the world of classic muscle power and keep this community thriving. Thanks for sharing your incredible build, and wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
a guy could use any block from a 360 361 or a 390 to build a 410. My nephew installed a merc 410 crank pistons and rods in his 1958 Edsel 361 Pacer convertible. he didn't tell anybody it was not a stock 361. He also used a later FMX transmission to get 3 speeds.
@@mylanmiller9656 Wow, Swapping a Merc 410 crank, pistons, and rods into a 361 block is pure genius, especially in a classic ’58 Edsel Pacer convertible-that car must be an absolute sleeper! Pairing it with an FMX 3-speed just takes it to the next level of performance and drivability. It’s builds like these that remind us why American muscle cars are all about innovation, power, and style. Have an amazing weekend and Merry Christmas
@@MuscleCarMasters68 my nephews Car had transmission problems like most Tel touch electric shifts. When he joined the Edsel club one guy on the sight give him all the information to install the FMX from a1968 390 wagon Galaxi. He also changed the Steering Colum, I am not sure what He the got it from to make the Select shifter work properly. He bought the 410 pistons and crank off eBay for Cheaper than he could have his 361-crank redone. His car even has the Distributor drive tach in it.
@@mylanmiller9656 Yes.... that’s an incredible build and a true testament to the ingenuity of muscle car enthusiasts! Swapping in the FMX transmission from a ’68 390 Galaxie wagon is a brilliant upgrade for reliability and performance, especially when paired with the Merc 410 crank and pistons. The fact that your nephew even incorporated the distributor drive tach adds a touch of vintage flair-talk about attention to detail! It’s these creative projects that keep the spirit of classic American muscle alive. Have a fantastic day. hope to see you next videos...
Absolutely The Mercury 410's high valve covers are a true standout-adding to its bold and aggressive look that perfectly matches its powerhouse performance. Did you know those covers were designed for better clearance, making it a functional and stylish choice? This engine was part of the legendary Ford FE series, known for its durability and torque-a favorite for muscle car enthusiasts and racers alike. What’s your favorite Mercury engine, and how does it stack up to the 410? Let us know in the comments Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more muscle car history. Wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
I get the appeal of the Mercury 410 high valve covers, but personally, I think the simplicity of the stock ones from the era has its own charm. Those big, flashy valve covers might steal the show, but sometimes it’s about the engine's raw power, not the flashy exterior.
@@Steven-re3tx yes.... I get what you're saying about the flashy Mercury 410 valve covers, but I gotta say, there’s something about the stock ones that just feels right. They may not have the flash, but they scream pure, unrefined muscle.
@@v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31 I have owned one. Put it in a 74 Rancho and used it to pull another car,..my wife and daughter,..all our belongings to Motorcycles Mechanics Institute. From Anchorage Alaska to Phoenix Arizona.
I remember my Grandmother on my Dads side bought new full size Mercurys all through to 1969, every 2-3 years. She had an all white in an out with leather interior with the rear window at an angle that went down. The men in the family told me about the special 410 engine, that was quiet and smooth, that was almost like the 413 Golden Lion in my Dads 64 Imperial Crown Coupe.
Hey, I love hearing those family stories, but I gotta say, while the 410 in those Mercurys was smooth and powerful, it didn’t really have the raw edge that some of the other big-blocks of the era had. The 410 V8 was a solid engine, no doubt, but if you're talking true muscle car performance, that 413 Golden Lion in the Imperial Crown Coupe had a little more bite. It was built for both power and luxury, and while the Mercurys were impressive in their own right, they didn’t quite match the high-revving, high-performance powerhouses that guys like us look for in a muscle car.
@@AdelynDodson I get what you're saying, but I still think the 410 in those Mercurys had its own unique charm. Sure, it wasn’t a high-revving beast like the 413, but that smooth power made it a perfect cruiser. The 410 was about refined muscle, not just raw, brute force.
Great review I bought a 67 Mercury Convertible as a project. I wasn't aware of the 410 i thought it had a 390 until I went for parts. I was told the 390 with a 428 crank =410. The ragtop would burn the rubber off the wheels all day long.
Thanks for sharing your awesome project story The '67 Mercury Convertible with a 410 is a true sleeper powerhouse-those FE engines are something special. You're spot-on about the 390 block with the 428 crank giving birth to the 410. With its high torque, it’s no wonder your ragtop could burn rubber all day long! We'd love to see how your build turns out, so keep us posted. Muscle car fans, what’s your dream project? Share in the comments Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share the love for American Muscle Cars. Have a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
Nice project, but gotta clarify something! While the 410 is a 390 block with a 428 crank, it's not just a parts-bin swap-it was factory-made for Mercurys. It’s underrated, though; less aggressive cam and compression than a 428, but still a torque monster! With the right tuning, your ragtop could be even meaner. Keep wrenchin
@@AdelynDodson Thanks for dropping some knowledge, the 410 is a factory-built torque beast that doesn’t get the recognition it deserves! Combining the 390 block and the 428 crank was a masterstroke by Mercury, creating an engine that’s perfect for effortless cruising and tire-shredding power. With its less aggressive cam and compression compared to a 428, it’s a hidden gem of the FE family, just waiting for the right tuning to unleash its full potential.
FE/FT engine displacements Displacement Type Bore+0.0036/-0.0000 Stroke+/-0.004 330 cu in (5.4 L) FT 3.875 in (98.4 mm) 3.5 in (88.9 mm) 332 cu in (5.4 L) FE 4 in (101.6 mm) 3.3 in (83.8 mm) 352 cu in (5.8 L) 3.5 in (88.9 mm) 3.3 in (83.8 mm) 359 cu in (5.9 L) FT 4.05 in (102.9 mm) 3.5" 360 cu in (5.9 L) FE 4.05" 3.5" 361 cu in (5.9 L) FT 4.05" 3.5" 389 cu in (6.4 L) 4.05" 3.784 in (96.1 mm) 390 cu in (6.4 L) FE 4.05" 3.784" 391 cu in (6.4 L) FT 4.05" 3.786 in (96.2 mm) 396 cu in (6.5 L) FE 4.2328 in (107.5 mm) 3.514 in (89.3 mm) 406 cu in (6.7 L) 4.13 in (104.9 mm) 3.784 in (96.1 mm) 410 cu in (6.7 L) 4.05 in (102.9 mm) 3.984 in (101.2 mm) 427 cu in (7.0 L) 4.2328 in (107.5 mm) 3.784 in (96.1 mm) 428 cu in (7.0 L) 4.13 in (104.9 mm) 3.984 in (101.2 mm)
Let’s not forget Ford’s OHV debut in 1954. That year, the 239 V8 kicked things off, only to be replaced by the 272 and 292 by 1955. Short-lived but significant, just like the 410
Yes....Ford’s OHV debut in 1954 with the 239 V8 was a true game-changer, paving the way for the legendary 272 and 292 in 1955. It’s amazing how these engines, though short-lived, left a huge mark on American car history-just like the underrated 410. These powerhouses set the stage for the muscle car era we all love. What’s your favorite Ford V8, fans? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to share your thoughts, subscribe to Muscle Car Masters, and spread the love for American muscle cars. Wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
@roberthaygarth8525 Absolutely The 1954 Canadian Monarch and Mercs with the one-year-only 256 Y-block were hidden gems in Ford's V8 evolution. These engines bridged the gap between the groundbreaking 239 OHV and the iconic 272 and 292 that roared into the muscle car spotlight. It's incredible how even these rarities contributed to the legacy of V8 power we celebrate today. What’s your all-time favorite Y-block or hidden gem in muscle car history? Drop your thoughts in the comments Merry Christmas
@mylanmiller9656 Yes.... Ford's early engines, like the 221 V8 and 144 inline-6, were prime examples of innovation, paving the way for the iconic powerplants that followed. From the legendary small blocks to the mighty big blocks like the 428 Cobra Jet, Ford kept pushing the boundaries of performance. These engines didn't just power cars; they powered a revolution in American muscle history....
Back in 87 i bought a 76 ford f250 2wd off of my buddy. he had put a 410 in to replace the original 390. it only had a 2 barrel carb if i remember correctly and we had to chain down the motor because it had so much torque it kept tearing the motor mount. it was no speed demon but it could pull a load well. another one of them trucks i never should have sold.
Wow, what an incredible story about your '76 Ford F-250 Dropping in a 410 to replace the 390 was a bold move, especially with that monster torque tearing motor mounts-classic American power at its finest! Those trucks were absolute workhorses, built for hauling and never backing down. Sounds like you had a beast that was more than just a truck; it was a piece of muscle history. We all have those vehicles we never should’ve let go. What’s everyone else’s ‘one that got away’? Drop your stories in the comments, share, and subscribe for more muscle car nostalgia. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
That’s an awesome story, but I gotta say, the 410 gets underrated for its potential. With the right upgrades-like a 4-barrel carb and better headers-that beast could’ve been a whole different animal. Torque’s great for towing, but this engine had room to shine in performance too. Sometimes it’s all about the setup
@@AdelynDodson the 410 is one of those engines that often gets overlooked but has untapped potential! With a 4-barrel carb, performance headers, and the right tuning, it could have been a true powerhouse on the strip as well as a towing champ. Ford's FE engines were built tough, and the 410 could hold its own with the right setup. It’s a reminder that performance is all about dialing in the perfect combo
My Sister had a 1966 Park Lane. Really nice. This was around 1972. Kind of a moroon metallic with frosty white leather interior. Ran strong and smooth. It would lay down some rubber it you floored it.
@johnharper2016 That 1966 Park Lane sounds like a dream The maroon metallic with frosty white leather must have been a stunning combo-true luxury and muscle blended perfectly. And laying down rubber? That’s the kind of raw V8 power we love in classic American cars! Mercury really brought their A-game with that ride. It's awesome to hear memories like this because they highlight just how iconic these cars were in their time. Thanks for sharing your story! What about the rest of you? Do you have a muscle car memory or a favorite ride from back in the day? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American muscle car history Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Hey, I get the appeal of that '66 Park Lane, but I gotta say, it wasn’t quite the muscle car a lot of people think it was. Sure, it had some power and style, but compared to the real heavy hitters of the time like the Mustang GT or Chevelle SS, it didn’t really pack the punch. Those cars were built for performance, not just luxury. Still, great memories though
Ford had other 2 year wonders. The FE 332. found in 1958 and 1959 Fords. And 1959 Edsels, The 58 Ford 332 was available with either a 2 or 4 barrel carburetor. The 1959 Ford and Edsel 332 only came with a 2 barrel carburetor, Also you had the 1958-59 Edsel 361 FE that came with a 4 barrel carburetor. This engine was also offered as a Ford Police car option.
Thank you for sharing this awesome info about the Ford FE 332 and Edsel 361 These two-year wonders are a hidden gem in Ford's history, showing how versatile the FE engine family really was. The 332’s mix of 2- and 4-barrel carb options made it stand out, and the Edsel 361 proves Ford had performance in mind even back then, especially with its Police car options. What do you think about these short-lived engines? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American Muscle Car history. Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
Love the passion, but let’s not sleep on the 332’s legacy-it wasn’t just a stepping stone. The 332 laid the groundwork for FE performance, proving itself as more than a two-year wonder. Plus, the Edsel 361 with the 4-barrel wasn’t just a police option; it paved the way for Ford’s police interceptor dominance later on
ford Degraded their Cars after 1958, The Edsel was top rung car in 1958 the smallest engine they had was a 361 4 barrel, For1959 you could get a 292 2 barrel, for 1960 you could get a 223 6 cylinder. Sure sounded like they were going in the wrong direction.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 A lot of people don't know it but, the Edsel 361 used the same block that Ford used to make 390, a 390 is a 361 with a stroker crank.
Wow, you're absolutely right The Ford 410 V8 is a true gem of the muscle car era, even if it was one of the shortest-lived engines Ford ever made. With its 4.05-inch bore and 3.98-inch stroke, it packed a solid punch, delivering incredible low-end torque-a hallmark of American muscle! These engines were mostly found in Mercury’s full-size models in 1966-67, making them a rare sight today. Spotting one is like finding a piece of American automotive history, and it's amazing you've seen a few of them To all our fellow muscle car fans: what’s your take on the 410 V8? Have you seen one in action or worked on one yourself? Drop your thoughts in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe to the channel, share this with other gearheads, and keep the muscle car legacy alive Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
While it's true the Ford 410 V8 had incredible torque, I think we often overlook its complexity and reliability issues. Yes, it's rare, but its limited production and the engineering behind it were more about raw power than longevity. with other idea...
@@CookeZachery I get where you're coming from, but honestly, the Ford 410 V8's complexity is part of what makes it such a standout. Sure, it wasn't the most reliable in the long run, but the engineering behind it was ahead of its time.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts The 410 is truly a hidden gem in the Ford lineup, a rare beast that left its mark despite its short run. You're absolutely right-finding a new air cleaner decal for it would be like hunting for treasure! But that’s what makes restoring these engines so rewarding-the thrill of preserving a piece of muscle car history. For all our fans, what’s the rarest muscle car part you’ve searched for? Share your stories in the comments Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more American Muscle Car treasures with us. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
@@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 Yes... Getting a custom-made decal for the 410 would be a fantastic way to restore its authenticity and bring that hidden gem back to life! The Ford 410 is a rare piece of muscle car history, and it’s incredible to see enthusiasts like you keeping its legacy alive. That air cleaner decal may be small, but it’s the details like these that truly make a restoration shine. Don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share the channel with friends who appreciate the roar of these legendary engines. Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas
@@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 Actually, while custom decals are possible, finding an authentic 410 air cleaner decal is a whole different story. Originals are rare since the 410 was short-lived, only offered in '66 Mercurys. Reproductions might not match the exact specs or details enthusiasts crave. Sometimes, part of the hunt is embracing the rarity that makes these cars special
I always thought the 410 was Mercury's shortest lived engine. I didn't think the Ford 428 was already around. I think the 428 and the 410 both came out in 1966. The 428 police engine used the solid lifter camshaft and aluminum intake manifold from the 390 police engine. The big Cadillac and Lincoln engines were designed for low RPM smoothness, as was the Chrysler 440 engine. I suspect the 410 was geared in direction also. The Cadillac, Lincoln and 1966-67 Chrysler 440 engines received special assembly attention to run super smooth. Did the 410 get that king of attention? For 1968 the Chrysler 440 got the same type of standard assembly, that the rest of the Chrysler engines did. 1966 and 1967 440's were dynamically balanced, while later ones got standard static balancing. This was Chrysler way of making a big to compete with the Cadillac and Lincoln engines. Maybe the 410 got the same type of attention for smoothness.
The 410 was more about power and performance than refined smoothness like the Cadillac or Lincoln engines. Ford had a different design approach for their performance engines. The 410 was more aggressive in its application, focusing on torque and high RPMs rather than ultra-smooth low-end cruising.
@BrandonLeeBrown Great insights, Brandon the 410 was indeed Mercury's shortest-lived engine, introduced in 1966 alongside the 428. However, while the 428 became a powerhouse in the Ford lineup, the 410 had a more niche role, emphasizing smoothness and torque over high-performance applications. It didn't receive the same meticulous assembly attention as the Cadillac, Lincoln, or early Chrysler 440 engines, but its direction was similar: smooth low-end power for luxury models like the Mercury. Ford saved the heavy-duty solid lifter and aluminum intake setup for its police and performance engines. What do you think-did the 410 deserve more spotlight? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe, share, and explore more American Muscle Cars. Merry Christmas, and have a great day
The 3.98 stroke crank was first introduced for the 1966 model run so you are correct. Ford added the 3.98 stroker crank to both the 390 and 406 blocks to make the 410 and 428 the same year. lots of guys added the 3.98 stroker crank to the 427 with a .030 over bore it made 453 CI. the problem was the crank was a Cast crank not forged so it limited RPM.
@@mylanmiller9656 I get where you’re coming from, but I gotta say, the 410 was never about raw RPMs or refinement. It was designed to deliver muscle in a big way-more about torque and power than high-revving smoothness like the 427 or the more refined, cruiser-type engines. Ford’s whole approach was to give it the grunt, the low-end torque, and the solid performance you could rely on in a muscle car, not necessarily the high-RPM revs that a cast crank in a 427 might give you.
Two Stances come to mind: 1). The Late Thities Mercury had a Flathead V8 with a series-exclusive stroker crank for extra pull and extra class. 2). The 410 served as a bridge, like the late-thirties flathead, to something greater. When the 428 could be marketed to the big Mercuries, it could be said to be an upgraded, smooth and quiet Mercury Engine. The bridge may have been a three-lane bridge compared to the four-lane bridge two blocks up the river, but it led to a quieter neighborhood.
Absolutely spot on! The late-thirties Mercury Flathead V8 was truly ahead of its time, delivering that perfect blend of power and elegance. That series-exclusive stroker crank gave Mercury a classy edge, carving out its place in automotive history. And speaking of bridges, the 410 FE was indeed a critical stepping stone-powerful enough to make a statement yet refined enough to pave the way for the legendary 428. It’s fascinating how these engines set the stage for Mercury’s reputation of smoothness and sophistication. Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine evolution story? Let us know in the comments! And if you're passionate about muscle cars and their rich history, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Let’s keep the spirit of these classics alive together. Wishing you a fantastic day and a very Merry Christmas Keep roaring down the highway
While I get where you're coming from, I have to disagree a bit. The 410 V8 was more than just a stepping stone it was a powerhouse in its own right. Sure, the 428 eventually came in, but the 410 had its own unique character and raw power that set it apart. The Flathead had charm, but the 410 brought muscle to the forefront, a bridge to performance, not just refinement.
While I get the appeal of the '67 Marauder with the 410 motor, I’ve always felt those big boats weren’t as exciting as some of the more compact muscle cars from that era. Sure, they had power, but the handling and agility just weren’t there. Give me something like a '69 Mustang Mach 1 or even a Camaro any day for a more thrilling, responsive driving experience
Wow, your buddy's '67 Marauder with the 410 motor must have been an absolute beast That 410 engine, part of Ford's FE series, packed serious power and torque-perfect for moving that stylish big boat with authority. The Marauder was all about commanding the road with elegance and muscle. Ford really nailed the balance between luxury and performance in the late '60s, making it a standout choice for enthusiasts who wanted both power and comfort. What do you think about the 410 compared to other Ford FE engines, like the 390 or the legendary 428? We'd love to hear more stories about your buddy's Marauder-or maybe your own muscle car memories! Don't forget to hit the like button, share your favorite muscle car experiences in the comments, and subscribe to our channel for more American Muscle Car content. Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas, car enthusiast family
The 390 stroker is a beast and a great example of Ford’s ingenuity. Turning the classic FE block into a stroker shows just how versatile and powerful these engines can be. With the right mods, they can easily punch above their weight, delivering torque and performance that muscle car fans dream of. It’s cross-pollination like this that keeps the spirit of innovation alive in the muscle car community. What do you think about this setup? Share your thoughts and let us know your favorite builds Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
I get where you're coming from, but honestly, I think a 390 stroker build isn't the best route for performance. Sure, it’s cool for showing off, but it’s not always the best choice for reliability or longevity. A stock 390 with some fine-tuning or even a 428 is more balanced and still delivers that raw muscle car feeling.
I wish I still had that old dentside pick up. If I had internet back then this was in the 90s. I still had it. Beautiful tall valve covers with the word Mercury and the lightning bolt threw it. I painted the valve covers red. The lettering black. And the silver lightning bolt Looking at it in that old Dent side. People used to ask if it was a four sixty People used to ask if it was a 460.
Your description of the Mercury valve covers with the lightning bolt is pure muscle car artistry-red, black, and silver? Classic and bold! That dentside must have been a head-turner. The fact people asked if it was a 460 just goes to show how much power and presence that Ford 410 V8 had, even though it was one of Ford's shortest-lived engines. That big-block beast, part of the FE family, really packed a punch in its day! Those were the golden days when craftsmanship and innovation were everything. To all our fellow enthusiasts: what are your memories of classic trucks or engines like this? Share them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more American Muscle Car history on our channel. Keep those stories rolling in, and have a great day Merry Christmas
I can definitely see the nostalgia for those old Dent-side pickups, but honestly, I think we need to give more credit to the true performance side of things. Sure, the 460’s a beast, but it’s not just about the looks or the paint jobs. It's the power, torque, and performance that define an American muscle car.
I get where you're coming from, but the 410 V8 wasn't just a bigger engine; it was Ford's way of bridging the gap between the 390 and 428, offering a unique balance of performance. It wasn’t about redundancy, it was about refining that extra punch. The 410 wasn’t just a step up; it was Ford’s muscle evolution in the FE series.
@bruceallen6016 You're absolutely right, Bruce Ford's 410 often gets overlooked because the 390 and 428 were already legends in the FE lineup. But here’s a fun fact for muscle car enthusiasts: the 410 was actually a unique offering, created by pairing the 428’s crankshaft with the 390’s bore-a true blend of torque and practicality. While it didn’t shine in performance circles, its place in Mercury models showed Ford's knack for versatility. What do you think-should Ford have doubled down on the 410, or was the 390/428 combo unbeatable? Let us know in the comments! Keep sharing your thoughts, and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more nostalgia and horsepower. Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
@@mylanmiller9656 I get what you're saying, but I still gotta disagree a bit. The 410 wasn’t just a filler engine-it was a stepping stone in Ford’s muscle car evolution. It was about refining performance, not redundancy. It offered a sweet spot between the 390 and 428, balancing power and drivability perfectly.
The 410 FE is a powerhouse too-more torque down low, smoother delivery, and a real sleeper when tuned right. It's not all about peak RPMs. Sometimes, it's the grunt that gets the job done, and the 410's got plenty of that.
Just another FE engine. Not much of a Ford guy myself. I always liked the 351 Cleveland or 400 Modified engines. The '79 Bronco came with that Modified. With headers and an aftermarket aluminum intake manifold. Those engines could be fun with a 4 speed. Certainly one of the last decent engines Ford offered, before emissions ravaged power output.
@andrewbecker3700 Thanks for sharing your thoughts The 427cid definitely has that raw, "uncivilized" charm that muscle car fans can’t resist. It’s true, the FE engines are iconic, but the 351 Cleveland and 400 Modified have their own special place in Ford’s performance history. The 351 Cleveland’s high-flow heads were ahead of their time, and the 400 Modified with headers and an aluminum intake was a torque monster, especially in rigs like the '79 Bronco! You’re spot on-those were the days before emissions started taming engines. What’s your favorite memory of driving a Ford V8? Let us know! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe for more American muscle car stories. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
@@andrewbecker3700 @andrewbecker3700 I get where you're coming from, but don’t sleep on the FE engines. The 410 FE may not have the high-rev party that the 351 Cleveland or 400 Modified do, but it's got a serious low-end torque punch that makes it a true sleeper. With the right tuning, the 410 can outpull a lot of those high-RPM engines in the real world. It’s not just about top-end; it's about raw power when you need it.
Not so. There was another 410 in 1958 for that year only used only on the 58 Edsel Corsair and Citation. It was an underbored version of the 430 Lincoln MEL engine. IT was Ford's shortest-lived V8. The 410 FE used in the 66 - 67 Mercs was the second-shortest, and the third-shortest, I think, is the 383 MEL engine, used in many 58, 59, and 60 Mercurys.
Thanks for the awesome info and for pointing that out You're absolutely right-the 1958 Edsel 410 was indeed a unique beast. It was part of the MEL family, sharing DNA with the 430 Lincoln engine but with that smaller bore to create the 410. What a fascinating piece of Ford history! And as you said, it was super short-lived, making it a true gem for collectors and enthusiasts. The 410 FE from ’66-’67 Mercs, though, holds its own as part of the legendary FE series, known for powering some serious muscle. And that 383 MEL? Another forgotten powerhouse that tells the story of Mercury’s bold experiments in the late '50s. Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Interesting take, but let’s not forget the 410 FE wasn't just a Merc exclusive. It bridged the gap between the 390 and 428, offering unique torque for mid-tier performance. Also, while the MEL engines were short-lived, they were beasts in their time.
Lest we forget. Robert Strange McNamara was the ramrod at FOMOCO in the late 1950s. That can of worms is now open. He was the reason for 2v carburetors (he saw no need for 4v carbs) on large displacement engines like the 430 and 462, limiting their performance, standardization of Lincoln, Ford, and Mercury drive trains, etc. Had he stayed on with Ford, no performance engines would've been produced, no Mustangs, Cougars, Shelbys, GT 40s, Boss 302, etc. FOMOCO would've been another Rambler.
You’re absolutely right Robert Strange McNamara had a significant impact on Ford during his tenure, and his conservative approach certainly left its mark. While he streamlined production and improved efficiency, his reluctance to embrace performance engineering could have steered Ford in a very different direction. Thankfully, with leaders like Lee Iacocca taking the reins, the performance era exploded with legends like the Mustang, Shelby GT350, and Boss 302! Imagine a world without these iconic muscle machines-it’s almost unthinkable for us enthusiasts. What’s your take? Would Ford have survived the muscle car era without its legendary lineup? Let us know in the comments below, and don’t forget to share, like, and subscribe to celebrate American Muscle Cars with us. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
While I see the point, McNamara's influence on Ford wasn't all bad. Sure, the 2v carb limitations stifled performance, but his drive for efficiency and standardization helped streamline production, making cars more affordable. Had Ford not embraced those changes, it might've struggled to keep up in the muscle car era.
While I get the fun of that 1972 F250 Highboy, I've gotta say, it's not always the best idea to push that kind of torque to the limits without reinforcing key parts. Trust me, I’ve seen way too many trucks and muscle cars with broken U-joints and yokes. It’s awesome when it holds up, but I’d recommend beefing up the driveline before going full throttle - you’ll save yourself a lot of headaches down the road
Wow, what an epic story A 1972 F250 High Boy with that kind of torque must’ve been an absolute beast! The power of those old-school trucks truly shows what American engineering was all about-raw strength and durability. Breaking U-joints and yokes? That’s the kind of fun only gearheads can fully appreciate. Have any pictures or more tales of that monster? We'd love to hear more! And hey, everyone, share your own muscle car stories in the comments below. Don’t forget to subscribe, like, and join our channel for more American Muscle greatness. Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
The 1966 Mercury Colony Park is a classic example of American ingenuity, blending style and power. If it had the legendary FE V8 under the hood, your parents were driving a masterpiece of engineering from that era. The FE engines, known for their reliability and torque, were a favorite in both performance and utility vehicles. We’d love to hear more about your memories with that beauty-what was it like to ride in such a powerhouse? Share your thoughts in the comments, and don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more muscle car history with us. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
Respect to the 390/428 crank combo, but the 410’s factory setup deserves more credit. It’s a legit piece of Ford’s history-basically a performance experiment bridging the gap to the 428. Sure, the 428 crank swap adds muscle, but the stock 410 had its own swagger, especially for Mercury fans.
Thanks for sharing that You’re absolutely right-putting a 428 crank into a 390 block is essentially the blueprint for the Ford 410 V8. This powerhouse was part of the Ford FE series and only had a short production run in 1966-1967, primarily found in Mercury models like the S-55 and Monterey. While it didn’t get the same fame as the 428 or 427, the 410 packed serious torque and exemplified Ford’s creativity in engine design during the muscle car golden era. What do you think about the 410 V8? Should it have been developed further or even made its way into more cars? Drop your thoughts below! And if you’re into American Muscle Cars, don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share our channel with other fans. Keep the muscle car spirit alive Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas Let’s celebrate our love for classics together
@@MuscleCarMasters68 *_The 410 had the smoothest idle of all the "FE" Fords. Something about its bore and stroke combo that just balanced out harmonically. They could pass the LEXUS's nickel on the motor test back in the '60s. Made good power and torque too._** Did any of McGarrett's Mercs have a 410 in it? hahaha LOL*
@@Imnotyourdoormat Thanks for the great insight something about that bore and stroke combo made the 410 FE one of Ford's smoothest performers. Its balance and power were unmatched for its time. McGarrett's Mercs might not have had the 410, but imagine the crime-fighting style with one under the hood! LOL. The 410 deserved more spotlight-its torque and creativity scream classic Ford ingenuity. What do you all think? Have an awesome day and Merry Christmas
@@hoost3056Thanks. I would say it was late 70’s to 80’s as well. I had a guy i used to work with had one. From what i remember they were decent little V-8’s. It was when Glidden was running the Futura in Pro Stock. Maybe someone with some more info will chime in?
Great question, and you're absolutely right Ford did offer the 255 V8, part of the Windsor engine family, in the early 1980s for models like the Fairmont and Futura. This small-displacement V8 was designed for fuel economy during the energy crisis, but it still carried that iconic American V8 heritage. Producing around 115 horsepower, it wasn’t a high-performance engine like the legendary 302 or 351 Windsor, but it played a key role in keeping the V8 alive during tough times for muscle car fans. What do you think about Ford’s approach during the fuel crisis? Were these engines a smart move, or do you think they should’ve focused more on performance? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to check out more on American Muscle Cars, share this with your friends, and subscribe to the channel for more great content. Have a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
the 255 V8 being in the Fairmonts and Futuras, but let's not confuse it with true muscle. The 255 was a low-performance engine designed for economy during the downsizing era. It doesn’t belong in the same league as the classic high-performance small-blocks or big-blocks that define muscle car heritage. Just my take
I get what you're saying, but honestly, I've always been more about the balance than the brute force. Sure, the raw torque is fun, but the handling and finesse of a well-tuned engine make all the difference in my book. Don't get me wrong, power's great, but a smooth, responsive ride is what truly makes a muscle car special.
Well, I already had a 64 Galaxy with a small block.I didn't need another car.I really needed that truck running.Let me tell you that thing would tear up some ground
@@AdelynDodson I hear you, but I gotta disagree. Muscle cars are about that raw, unfiltered power. Sure, handling’s nice, but when you drop the hammer and feel that engine roar, that’s what defines a muscle car. A tight ride is cool, but nothing beats the thrill of torque and horsepower pushing you back in your seat.
@forestlawrencegrading9154 Wow, what a story! Dropping that powerhouse into your ‘73 F-250 must’ve turned it into a beast! That’s the beauty of American muscle-it's all about raw power, torque, and versatility. The fact that it could "tear up some ground" shows the magic of those engines-they're made for performance and durability, whether it's in a classic Galaxie or a workhorse truck. Sounds like you made the perfect call putting that engine to work where you needed it most. Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below Let’s keep celebrating the heart and soul of American muscle. And don’t forget-like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more amazing stories, history, and nostalgia Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas to you and your family
Thanks for sharing Sprint cars, especially the 410s, are a thrilling spectacle of power and precision-just like the legendary muscle cars we love. Did you know that many sprint car engines share the same high-performance roots as American muscle car engines? That raw horsepower, thundering down the track, is what keeps fans like us coming back for more. Speaking of power, what's your favorite muscle car? Let us know in the comments! And don’t forget to explore more incredible American Muscle Cars on our channel-your one-stop destination for history, performance, and passion. Like, share, and subscribe to join the community of true enthusiasts. Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas full of horsepower dreams
410 may be rare, but how about the 221 Windsor? Introduced in '62 and gone by mid-'63, it’s another contender for Ford’s shortest lived V8. Coincidentally, its 221 cubic inches matched the original flathead V8...
Great point about the 221 Windsor Introduced in '62 and phased out by mid-'63, it’s another Ford gem that’s often overshadowed. As Ford’s first small-block V8, it paved the way for the legendary Windsor family, including the iconic 289 and 302. The 221 may have been short-lived, but its role in muscle car history is undeniable. Pairing it with the flathead V8's displacement was a nod to Ford’s legacy What do you all think? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to share and subscribe for more American muscle car history. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
@@CBX1980 I get where you're coming from, but I gotta say, the 221 Windsor doesn’t get enough love. Yeah, it was short-lived, but it had some potential for its time, especially in the early '60s. Sure, the 410 FE's a standout for rarity, but Ford didn’t exactly leave the 221 out in the cold, it’s part of the evolution of their V8 lineup and deserves more recognition.
@AilaniMadden The 221 was listed as part of the 90°V family, along with the 260, 289, 302,and 351 before the Cleveland (335 series) was produced. That 221 was the starting point of all Ford small blocks. The first with the thin wall casting, skirtless block. Carroll Shelby took notice and advantage of these, and the first Cobras were 260 powered. These designs made Ford and kept Ford in the 60s. A LOT of full-size cars (and trucks) were small block powered. I agree the 221 started a great thing. No first gen Mustang or Cougar would've been V8 powered without the small block. Thanks for the reply.
@@CBX1980 I see what you're saying, but I have to disagree a bit. While the 221 Windsor gets credit for being a starting point, it’s important to remember it was really a stepping stone to better performance. The 260 and 289 made bigger waves, and the 221 just didn’t have the torque and power the later small blocks did. The FE engines, like the 390, were the real muscle behind Ford’s dominance in the '60s.
The Ford 410 V8 might not have lasted long, but it was a masterpiece in its time. Built as part of the FE engine family, the 410 was introduced in 1966 and was basically a mix of power and smooth performance, thanks to its unique bore and stroke design. It delivered 330 horsepower and a staggering 444 lb-ft of torque, making it a beast under the hood of iconic cars like the Mercury Cyclone GT. Ford truly outdid itself, blending raw power with smooth drivability. It’s a shame it didn’t stick around longer, but it left a lasting impression on muscle car enthusiasts like us. What do you think? Should Ford have developed it further? Let us know in the comments below! And don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share the love for American muscle cars. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you
I get the power and performance angle, but I’d argue the 410 wasn’t just about raw aggression. Ford’s approach was about balance, torque and smooth power delivery. It’s not all about high RPMs; a muscle car still needs that low-end grunt for real-world driving. The 410 gave you the best of both worlds.
You're absolutely right The legendary 428 and 390 engines are the heart and soul of American muscle car history, delivering that iconic sound we all love-true ear candy for enthusiasts like us! These engines weren’t just about raw power; they defined an era of innovation and dominance on the streets and the track. Thanks for sharing your excitement! What’s your favorite engine or muscle car memory? Let’s keep the conversation going in the comments Don’t forget to share the love for American Muscle Cars, subscribe to our channel, and join the community. Have an awesome weekend and a Merry Christmas
I get the love for the 428/390, but don’t sleep on the 410 V8-it's got a unique history that doesn't always get the spotlight. It’s more than just ear candy, it’s about that raw, untapped power.
I owned a 67 Mercury Monterey in the early 90s with 410. They were okay but the distributor was a problem. The rod to the oil pump was week also and would strip out causing oil pump to fail. My 419 had that problem and threw 2 rods. Too bad for my Mercury car. I car to the junk yard after that.
Wow, owning a '67 Mercury Monterey with a 410 is a story worth telling That 410 FE engine was a powerhouse for its time, even if it came with some quirks like the weak distributor gear and that pesky oil pump rod. It’s tough to hear your Monterey faced such a dramatic end-it’s a reminder of how vital proper maintenance and upgrades were for these classics. For enthusiasts today, modern aftermarket upgrades can address those weak points, keeping these legends alive and roaring on the road. To everyone reading, what’s your experience with the 410 or other FE engines? Let us know in the comments below! Keep sharing your stories and love for these American classics. Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share with your fellow gearheads to keep the muscle car legacy strong Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you and all Muscle Car fans...
Hey, I get your frustration with those issues, but I’ve got to disagree on calling the 410 V8 a letdown. Sure, some components like the distributor and oil pump rod had their flaws, but when running right, that engine was a powerhouse. The Mercury Monterey's design was solid, and with proper maintenance, it could’ve gone a lot longer. Just needed some TLC
This is the equivalent of a Chevy 396, 4.094 bore, with a 454 4.00 stroke. Some of the newer LS Chevies are similar design. This looks like a candidate for NHRA Stock/Super Stock! Like the kid said what you need is some freakin' torque!
Longer stroke hurts HP & TQ. ALL racing engines follow a basic design. "Run the largest bore the achitecture will accomodate & then put in the stroke needed to reach the displacement goal. Use whatever length rod is needed to connect the CS to the pistons, as rod length has almost zero affect on TQ & HP." Oversquare always makes more power than undersquare & a short stroke big bore engine will always make more TQ & HP than a longer stroke/smaller bore engine of the the same displacement. The reason for this is that the additional piston speed creates much more friction & the smaller bore impedes the airflow. Do the math for "piston speed". Use 3.25" & 3.5" strokes @ any RPM but it's pretty simple. @ 10000 RPM, the pistons EACH travel 5,833 ft with a 3.5" stroke & 5416 FT with w 3.25" stroke. The 8 pistons must "travel" 5/8 of a mile further in 1 minute with the longer stroke. That's a lot of friction since almost all of the parasitic drag in an engine is caused by the piston rings! The emissions engines built since the early 70 are still oversquare but they increased the stroke & reduced the bore, not for performance but rather, to more efficiently control emissions. The GM LS engines perform so well because GM dramatically increased the intake port volume in them. The lowly 4.8 LS has 200cc intake port volume, which is more than 15% larger than any Gen 1 small block production line head, which was 170cc.
I get where you're coming from, but I think you're overlooking the charm of the older setups. The 410 FE might not have the sheer torque numbers of a newer LS, but it's got character and a vintage muscle car feel that modern engines just can't replicate.
@JohnW1711stock Absolutely, you nailed it Combining the 4.094 bore with the 4.00 stroke makes for a powerhouse setup, reminiscent of the legendary Chevy 396 and big-block 454’s brute force. This blend delivers that earth-shaking torque perfect for NHRA Stock/Super Stock domination. And you're right-torque is king! LS engines carry that innovative Chevy spirit forward, proving muscle never goes out of style. What do you think, fans? Got any favorite builds or setups that deliver insane torque? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more thrilling content. We appreciate your support and wish you a great day and a Merry Christmas filled with horsepower dreams
@bradgriffith4231 Excellent breakdown of stroke, bore, and piston speed You’re absolutely right that oversquare engines dominate performance builds, especially in racing. In muscle cars, legendary engines like the 426 HEMI and GM LS engines prove how crucial airflow and bore size are for making power. Those Gen 1 small blocks, while iconic, paved the way for today's high-performance tech. And you're spot on about piston speed-friction is the silent killer of horsepower! The LS series revolutionized modern muscle with those larger intake ports, ensuring airflow meets the demand for speed and torque. What do you all think? Share your insights and favorite engines below! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share with other muscle car fans. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
You’re absolutely right The Ford 410 V8 found new life in the legendary Eleanor from Gone In 60 Seconds. It’s incredible how this engine, though short-lived in its original production run, became a star decades later. The 410’s unique blend of torque and performance made it the perfect choice for Eleanor, a car that symbolizes everything we love about American muscle: raw power, stunning design, and a legacy that never fades. What’s your favorite moment with Eleanor in Gone In 60 Seconds? Let us know in the comments! And while you’re here, don’t forget to hit that like button, subscribe for more muscle car history and engine spotlights, and share this video with fellow fans of American muscle. Wishing you an awesome day and a Merry Christmas
Actually, the 410 engine wasn’t resurrected for Eleanor in Gone in 60 Seconds. That GT500 used a 351 Windsor stroked to 408 ci. It’s a common misconception, but the 410 was more of a one-off FE engine from 1966. Eleanor’s heart leaned more toward modern performance tweaks than a true 410 revival.
@@AdelynDodson Hey, I get where you're coming from, but here's the thing: While it’s true the 351 Windsor was in Eleanor, there's more to the story. The 410 FE engine, in its original form, was never completely forgotten. It was actually revived for the custom Eleanor build, making that iconic muscle car even more of a legend.
@@mylanmiller9656 Yes....While the 351W stroked to 408ci is the engine they used in Eleanor, it’s important to remember that the 351W and the FE engines are very different beasts. The FE series, especially the 410, was built for different performance goals back in the 60s. The 351W, while a great engine, is a much more modern design with a different architecture.
That’s an awesome score The Ford 410 with an automatic transmission is a solid powerhouse-a rare gem from the FE family that’s just waiting to unleash its torque. Whether you’re thinking of restoring a classic Galaxie, building a custom hot rod, or surprising everyone with a unique project, that 410 is ready to rumble. What ideas are you leaning toward? Let’s hear your thoughts And to all the fans out there, drop a comment with your dream builds, share this post, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more gearhead content. Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
@ I bought the whole car just for the engine , it came out of a 67 mercury, this the second one I’ve owned. The first one I. Turned it into a 428, bore it 080 thousand, the c6me-a and c7me-a block is ok to bore 80 thousand , I did that almost twenty years ago , put the engine in a 1968 GT fastback , I’ve still got the fastback Never no problems
@@FredCombs-j7o That’s incredible... Owning not just one, but two 410 V8s is a testament to your passion for the FE family. The work you did turning the first one into a 428 is the stuff of legends-boring it out to .080” is no small feat! That engine paired with a 1968 GT Fastback? Absolute perfection. The fact that you’ve had it for decades and it’s still running strong speaks volumes about your craftsmanship and Ford’s bulletproof engineering. The C6ME-A and C7ME-A blocks were truly built to last, weren’t they? thank you so much and have a great day.
That's awesome you snagged a 410 with an automatic! But here’s a thought-why not embrace its roots? The 410 was built for torque, especially in heavy cruisers like the Mercury Monterey. Dropping it into a classic full-size ride could keep the spirit alive while giving you a beastly highway cruiser. What do you think?
@@MuscleCarMasters68 I’ve got a 63 galaxy XL missing the motor and tranny, but I do have a64 XL complete with a bad tranny, those are both good candidates
I'm surprised by the information in this video. My 1959 Edsel 13 passenger wagon has the 410 engine in it. I remember having to buy the rebuild kit for it from JC Whitney because it was such a rare engine you could not get parts for it anywhere else in 1987. It was an awesome engine though, even in such a heavy car.
Interesting take, but honestly, I don't think the 410 engine in the Edsel was the best fit for that heavy wagon. Sure, it had power, but the weight of that car made it sluggish, and parts were tough to come by, even back in the day. The 332 FE or 390 would have been a better choice for more performance without the hassle.
So great...A 1959 Edsel 13-passenger wagon with the Ford 410 V8-now that's a rare gem The 410 was a unique powerhouse, part of the FE family, and it’s fascinating to hear about your experience rebuilding it. JC Whitney sure was a lifesaver back in the day for sourcing those hard-to-find parts. With its impressive torque and smooth performance, the 410 was definitely underrated, even in a car as hefty as the Edsel wagon. It’s great to see someone keeping the spirit of this rare engine alive! To all our fellow muscle car enthusiasts, what’s your story with the 410 or other short-lived engines? Share your thoughts in the comments below! And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more deep dives into the history of American Muscle Cars. Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
Hey, I get the passion, but I gotta say, there’s a bit of confusion here. The '67 Parklane didn’t come with the FE 410 V8 as a factory option. It’s possible someone swapped it in later, but Ford didn’t offer it in that model. Some fans mix up engine swaps with factory specs, so it’s important to check the car’s history. Just wanted to clear that up for the real muscle fans
Your dad’s '67 Parklane had the legendary 410 V8? That’s incredible The Ford 410 V8 is one of those engines that gets car enthusiasts talking because of its rarity. Introduced in 1966, it was part of the Ford FE family and produced for only two years, making it a true gem in muscle car history. Built for torque, it boasted a 4.05-inch bore and a 3.98-inch stroke, packing 345 horsepower and 450 lb-ft of torque-a powerhouse perfect for full-sized cars like the Parklane. Some folks doubt its existence because it was quickly overshadowed by the 428, but you’ve got the story to prove otherwise! What about you, muscle car fans? Have you or someone you know experienced this rare engine? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to share, like, and subscribe to celebrate American muscle cars. Have a great day and a Merry Christmas
the '67 Parklane didn’t come with the FE 410 V8 as a factory option. It’s possible it was swapped in later, which makes your dad’s story even more intriguing. Engine swaps were pretty common back in the day, especially for enthusiasts looking to pack more power under the hood. The FE 410, introduced in 1966 and built for torque with 345 horsepower and 450 lb-ft, was a favorite for performance upgrades. If it ended up in a Parklane, someone had a keen eye for muscle car greatness
I get where you're coming from, but I have to disagree on the horsepower estimate for the '58 Edsel Citation. From what I’ve researched, the original engine options were a 361 cubic inch V8, but it was more in the 303 HP range.
I get what you're saying about the '58 Edsel Citation, but honestly, that engine's HP might be a bit off. The 410 V8 in the Edsel actually had around 303-310 hp, depending on the exact specs. It’s a good engine, but not as wild as some might think, especially compared to the bigger FE blocks Ford came out with later on.
Wow, the ‘58 Edsel Citation with that engine is an absolute gem If it had the Super Express V8 (410 cubic inches), it likely packed 345 HP with 475 lb-ft of torque. That powerhouse was part of Ford’s MEL engine lineup, designed to deliver smooth power with a touch of elegance, perfect for a premium cruiser like the Citation. Back in the day, these engines symbolized the era’s bold engineering, blending muscle and luxury. Your Edsel must’ve been a real head-turner! American muscle cars like the Edsel remind us why we love this era so much-raw power, unique designs, and unforgettable road presence. What’s your best memory behind the wheel of your Citation? Share your story with us, and let’s keep the conversation alive! Everyone, join the community by commenting, sharing, and subscribing for more classic muscle content. Have an amazing day, and Merry Christmas to you
Sheesh, posted the same message on the other "410FE is the shortest Ford engine ever" video that this is yet more from the Ford illiterate. There were several other two-year engines including the 410MEL, 361FE, 406FE and so forth so there's no truth to the 410FE being the shortest. As a matter of fact, that title belongs to several others including the one-year 256 Y-block, one-year M-code 351-4V Windsor, one-year Y-code 352-4V solid lifter, one-year G-code 332-4V and no doubt others. Please leave history to those who care about the actual facts.
Hey, I get where you're coming from, but I think there's a bit of confusion here. While there are other engines that are shorter in certain specs, the 410FE is still a standout in the FE family when considering its overall performance and specific design. It’s not just about length-it’s about how that engine was built to perform. Let's appreciate each engine’s uniqueness, even if they're not all "shortest."
the 410 FE was a good idea but it was far from Shortest lived engine there are some that only lasted 1 year. Most were first model year engines that were replaced by larger engines of teh same design.
@@mylanmiller9656 Hey, I totally get the enthusiasm around the 410 FE, but I have to say, calling it one of the "shortest-lived" engines might be a bit off. Sure, it didn’t stick around long, but that doesn't mean it didn't leave an impact. Many of those "one-year wonders" were part of a bigger shift in engine design, with manufacturers constantly pushing the envelope for performance and efficiency. The 410 FE, while brief, was unique for its specific role in the FE lineup, and its performance still earned respect in the muscle car world.
Thanks for the detailed comment and sharing your insights! You’re absolutely right-Ford’s history is rich with engines that had short production runs, and it’s great to see someone passionate about keeping those facts alive. The 410 FE often gets misrepresented, and your list highlights just how many unique engines Ford developed over the years, from the 256 Y-block to the rare 406 FE. These engines played a pivotal role in shaping Ford’s legacy in performance and innovation. Have a fantastic day, and Merry Christmas to you and all our muscle car fans out there
@MylanMiller9656 Thanks for the awesome insight! You’re spot on-the 410 FE wasn’t the shortest-lived engine in Ford’s lineup, and it’s incredible how many one-year wonders came and went in muscle car history. Engines like the 428 CJ and the Boss 302 are often remembered, but Ford’s experimental gems, like the 221 Windsor or the 406 FE, paved the way for future powerhouses. These short-lived engines might not have stuck around, but their impact on American performance history is undeniable. It’s always amazing to see fans like you keeping this knowledge alive. Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
Hey, I totally get the nostalgia for the 410, but Ford never actually put that engine in the Thunderbird. The Thunderbird was more about luxury and performance, but it never saw the 410 V8 in its lineup. Some enthusiasts might’ve swapped it in, but that would’ve been a custom job. Ford’s FE engine family was more common in bigger cars like the Galaxie or even the F-series trucks. Just a heads up
Great memory Yes, the 410 V8 did find its way into the 1966 Ford Thunderbird, but only for a short time. The 410 was part of Ford's FE engine family and shared its foundation with the 390 and 428 engines. It featured a 4.05-inch bore and a 3.98-inch stroke, delivering around 345 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque. The 410 was primarily intended for Mercury vehicles like the Park Lane, but Ford equipped some Thunderbirds with it as well, likely to appeal to those who wanted a balance of power and luxury. While it wasn’t the most common engine, its smooth torque delivery made it perfect for the Thunderbird’s refined yet muscular character. What do you think of Ford’s choice? Share your thoughts and memories below! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more about American Muscle Cars on our channel. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
Wow, that’s a fantastic piece of history you’re bringing up Mercury’s Canadian-made pickups are a hidden gem in automotive history. The Mercury M-Series, exclusive to Canada, often borrowed from Ford’s playbook but added unique touches to stand out. While the 410 engine was primarily seen in select Mercury and Ford passenger cars, there’s a possibility a few of these powerhouses made their way into Mercury pickups, given Canada’s knack for blending models back then. It’s definitely worth exploring further Can you imagine cruising in one of those Mercury pickups with a 410 V8 under the hood? That’s muscle and history combined! If anyone here has more info or stories about these Canadian trucks, drop it in the comments-we’d love to hear from you! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more American muscle car history. Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas
@@MuscleCarMasters68 ---- I'm from Wisconsin, and used to go to a fishing camp in lower Ontario for many years. In the early 80's, they had a Mercury truck (among others) that we would drive to the various lakes. These trucks were absolutely beaten to death driving through tree paths that were only 4' wide, through rivers, into logging areas, you name it. I was at that camp many times and you'd see a certain truck for maybe 3-4 years and then it was gone. The Mercury went that way as well. Even at the time, in my early 20's, I wanted to take that thing home badly just because of the uniqueness of it. I wish I had bothered to see what was under the hood, but at the time it wasn't all that important to me. At least I got to drive one...that's more than most people can say!
I took the crank for a 221 and put it in a 79 / 302 truck block with drop forge pistons 63 260 sprint rods thay are 43)40 steel put grade 12 aircraft bolts in the rods 190 psi.tensel straight thay ballencd it to turn 1400.00rpm and it gives a 454 big block Chevy a run for the money I have even beat a 454 duel tunnel ram
I get the enthusiasm, but honestly, I think the 221 crank swap into a 302 truck block is a bit overhyped for real performance. While it’s impressive to see what you've done with those 260 sprint rods and aircraft bolts, the bottom end of a 302 just isn’t built to hold up against a big-block like a 454, no matter how high you rev it.
@gregoryplummer-l9l Wow, Gregory, that’s an incredible build you’ve got there! Swapping a 221 crank into a 302 truck block with drop-forged pistons and 260 Sprint rods is pure old-school ingenuity. The grade 12 aircraft bolts and balancing it to hit 14,000 RPM is next-level engineering. It’s no surprise it gives a 454 big block Chevy a run for its money-your setup sounds like a serious street-and-strip monster For fans of American Muscle Cars, this is the kind of passion and innovation that defines our love for these machines. What do you all think of Gregory's build? Got any stories or similar builds to share? Let us know in the comments Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to explore more incredible American muscle builds. Thanks for sharing, Gregory-wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas....
That’s a gem right there! The 410 V8 was part of Ford’s legendary FE engine family, known for its mix of durability and performance. While it wasn’t as famous as the 428 Cobra Jet or the 427, the 410 packed a punch with a 4.05-inch bore and 3.98-inch stroke, producing solid torque and power for its time. Many enthusiasts might not know it was exclusive to Mercury vehicles like the Monterey and the Park Lane. These engines were built for smooth cruising but could roar when you put your foot down. What do you remember most about it? Let us know Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine memory? Comment below, share your stories, and don’t forget to explore more on American Muscle Cars. Subscribe to keep the muscle car spirit alive. Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
The F100 paired with a strong engine is a true classic powerhouse-your dad knew how to build a beast! It’s amazing how these old trucks, when equipped with the right engine, still hold their own on the road. What engine did he drop in-maybe a 390 FE or something like a 460 big block? Let us know! These are the stories that keep the American muscle spirit alive. Share more about it in the comments, and remember to subscribe for more muscle car history and builds. Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas to you and your family
Sure, they’re strong, but there are better options if you want raw performance. You’ve got to consider the newer tech, like the 351 Cleveland or even the 429. They offer more power and efficiency, making them a solid choice for anyone looking to get the most out of their ride.
@@AdelynDodson I get where you're coming from, but I still think the older FE series engines hold a special place. The 427 and 428 have that raw, classic muscle car sound and feel that the newer engines just can't match. Sure, modern tech is great for efficiency, but there’s something about the old-school power and soul that gives the FE its legendary status.
I get that 272 and 292 might seem like random numbers, but they were actually significant for Ford's early V8 engines. The 272, introduced in '55, was a step up from the Flathead V8, and the 292 followed in '57, offering more power. These engines laid the groundwork for the legendary 390 and 427. Without these early small-blocks, we wouldn't have the muscle car era we know and love today
Great question The 272 and 292 V8 engines were part of Ford's iconic Y-block engine family, known for powering some of the most legendary Fords of the 1950s. These engines were significant for introducing innovations like overhead valves and crossflow cylinder heads, making them pioneers in Ford’s shift toward modern engine designs. The 272 was the workhorse, found in models like the Customline, while the 292 was more performance-oriented, gracing cars like the Thunderbird and Mercury Montclair. Both helped solidify Ford’s reputation for durability and power during a pivotal time in American automotive history. What’s your favorite Ford V8? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to explore more American muscle content on our channel. Like, share, and subscribe to join our growing community of muscle car enthusiasts. Wishing you a great day and a very Merry Christmas Keep cruising and stay passionate about muscle cars
The Ford 406 is a fantastic engine and a true legend of its era. Known as the high-performance powerhouse of the early 1960s, it set the stage for the muscle car wars to come. Built on the FE block, the 406 packed a punch with its high compression and impressive horsepower, dominating drag strips and NASCAR tracks alike. It was a bridge to the 427, making it a key piece of Ford’s performance history. We’ll definitely consider diving into the 406’s history, engineering, and impact in a future video-stay tuned! In the meantime, let us know what other classic engines or cars you'd love us to explore in the comments below. Don’t forget to share this video, hit that subscribe button, and join us as we celebrate American muscle cars Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
I get the excitement for the 410, but I’ve gotta say, it’s not always about raw power. Sure, the 410 had plenty of muscle, but there’s more to the equation-handling, durability, and tech were key too. If you’re just looking at straight-line speed, the 410’s 4V was a beast, but don't forget the balance and refinement that other engines like the SBC could bring to the table.
Wow, what a story That 410 4V must have been a beast tearing up those Alabama roads! The Ford 410, part of the legendary FE engine family, had serious muscle under the hood with its high-performance build, especially in the late '60s. It’s incredible to hear how it outran Chevy police cars-those tailpipes never saw it coming! This engine was all about torque and raw power, making it a true standout. Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine showdown memory? Share your stories below! And don’t forget to comment, like, and subscribe to the American Muscle Car channel for more epic tales like this. Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Hey there, thanks for your comment We always aim to keep it real and make every episode feel like you're chatting with a fellow muscle car fan. From the roar of a V8 to the history that drives these beauties, American Muscle Cars have a story that deserves to be shared. What’s your favorite muscle car of all time? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe for more deep dives, share this with other enthusiasts, and let's keep the muscle car passion alive. Thanks for watching and being part of this amazing community. Have a great day and a Merry Christmas to you and yours
I get that the Mercury Marauder 390 is a beast, but honestly, it doesn’t get enough love in the muscle car world. Sure, it had power, but compared to some other iconic cars like the '69 Charger or the Mustang, it's a bit overlooked. It's more of a sleeper, but the big-block torque and that long, low stance really gave it a different kind of edge. It's all about preference, though...
You’re not alone in thinking that The 410 and 406 might seem like MEL engines at first glance, but they’re part of the legendary Ford FE family, which gave us iconic engines like the 390 and 427. The FE series is all about power and versatility-dominating drag strips, NASCAR, and even Le Mans! It’s this history that keeps muscle car fans hooked. What’s your favorite FE engine story? Let us know in the comments, share this video with fellow gearheads, and don’t forget to subscribe for more muscle car history Wishing you a great weekend and a Merry Christmas
@silicon212 You're absolutely right The Ford FE series engines, including the 410 and 406, were legendary in their time, dominating the early 1960s performance scene. Meanwhile, the MEL series, like the 410 and 430, came earlier, hitting the streets in the late '50s. Both engine families brought incredible power, but they were designed with different goals-FE for versatility and MEL for luxury muscle What’s your favorite FE or MEL engine story? Share it in the comments
You are Correct the 410 was in the 1958 EDSEL Capri and Citation., it was a MEL engine. but in 1966 Ford Put a 428 crank into a 390 block and installed it into the Merc line this was the FE 410. They are confused with each other, but they are two different engines. The 406 was an FE Ford built for NASCAR racing, it replaced 390 in mid 1961, Then was replaced in 1963 by the 427 low riser.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 Believe it or not a MEL 430 won Top fuel Class in 1959. And the 430 Merc Marauder Engine was the first American Automotive engine to be rated at 400 hp. Beauchamp was second at Daytona in a Holman & Moody prepped 1959 430 Thunderbird. Not all MEL engines were intended to pull Luxury cars around.
Thanks for bringing that up Ford’s 383 cubic inch engine comes from the legendary MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, built between 1958 and 1968. This engine family was famous for its innovation, powering some of the most iconic luxury and performance cars of the era. The 383ci was one of the smaller-displacement MEL engines but still packed a punch with its torque-heavy design. While MEL engines weren’t as performance-focused as the FE series, they represent an important chapter in Ford’s engine history. We’d love to hear what you think about the MEL family and how it compares to other Ford engine lines. Share your thoughts in the comments Don’t forget to check out our other videos diving into Ford’s history and subscribe for more deep dives into American Muscle Cars. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas Stay passionate about muscle cars
Actually, I gotta disagree with you on the MEL family. While it’s a cool part of Ford’s history, the 383ci wasn’t quite as iconic or impactful as the FE or 427ci big blocks. The MEL didn’t have the same performance pedigree, and when it comes to muscle, the FE and Windsor engines truly take the crown.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 My friends Brother had a 1958 Meteor Rideau 2 door hard top that had a MEL 383 engine in it. A Meteor is Canadian Ford the Canada plant made some goofy things.
@@mylanmiller9656 thank you so much for your comment....1958 Meteor Rideau 2-door hardtop with a MEL 383-that’s a rare gem from Ford’s Canadian lineup! The MEL 383 may not have been as high-revving as the FE series, but its torque-heavy design made it a powerhouse for luxury and performance. Meteors are such a cool part of automotive history, showing how Ford Canada put its own twist on iconic designs. What’s your take on the MEL engines compared to Ford’s FE or Windsor lines? Let us know in the comments below have a good day.
To bad Ford didn’t make it a performance engine and allow its use in the Mustang, Torino and Fairlane GT’s as an option. The 390 was no match for Chebbies 396, the 410 having 20 extra cubic inches and the 428.s cam, carb and intake would have been very competitive
I see where you're coming from, but honestly, Ford's decision to stick with the 390 made sense for the time. The 410 V8 wasn’t just about raw power-it had a unique balance that worked better in the heavier models like the Galaxie. Plus, the 428 wasn’t far behind, with excellent torque and flexibility. It wasn’t about always beating Chevy, but creating a solid, reliable performer.
You're absolutely right It’s a shame that Ford didn’t leverage the potential of the 410 V8 to make a splash in their performance lineup. With its unique combination of a 4.05-inch bore and the 428's 3.98-inch stroke, the 410 had serious untapped potential. Imagine if they had paired it with a high-performance cam, a four-barrel carb, and a free-flowing intake-this engine could’ve been a real contender against Chevy’s 396 and given Ford fans another powerhouse option in iconic models like the Mustang, Torino, or Fairlane GT. The 410 is a great “what-if” in muscle car history, and it’s one reason why Ford enthusiasts love to debate what could have been. What do you think? Would the 410 have changed the muscle car wars? Let us know in the comments Don't forget to subscribe, like, and share for more American Muscle Car history and insights. Have a great day and Merry Christmas
I get where you're coming from, but I still think the older FE series engines hold a special place. The 427 and 428 have that raw, classic muscle car sound and feel that the newer engines just can't match. Sure, modern tech is great for efficiency, but there’s something about the old-school power and soul that gives the FE its legendary status.
that power number depended on the year of the engine, and what model it was. if it was a 1958 it had more power than later engine, by 1960 the Lincoln engine could be had with a 2-barrel carb. Ford had problems with the 1958 engines, so they Cut the power back on later engines. The 1958 Merc Marauder engine with 3 x 2 barrel carbs was rated at 400hp.
Yes...the 430 V8 cranked out an impressive 365 horsepower, making it a powerhouse of its time! Known as the “Bulldozer,” this engine was a key player in some iconic vehicles, like the Lincoln Continental and Mercury’s big cruisers in the late ’50s and early ’60s. Its torque was legendary, perfect for those heavy, luxury rides that defined American engineering. Fun fact: this engine was part of the MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, a powerhouse lineup designed to compete with the best in the muscle and luxury market of the era. What’s your favorite ride that featured the 430? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into classic engines and muscle cars. Share the love for American automotive history, and stay tuned for more Wishing you a fantastic day and a very Merry Christmas, muscle car enthusiasts
Ford’s 410 engine, part of the FE family, was one of their most unique and short-lived powerhouses, making it a true gem for enthusiasts. Released only in 1966 and 1967, the 410 combined the stroke of a 428 with the smaller bore of a 390, delivering impressive low-end torque while keeping that big-block feel. It’s no surprise that it became a favorite for both performance and style during its time. Got any memorable stories about your '67 with the 410? We'd love to hear them Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas! Keep the muscle car spirit alive
406 COD What a callout, and you're spot on-it’s part of the fascinating Ford FE engine family, and it paved the way for some iconic big blocks! While the 410 V8 was short-lived, its legacy is undeniable, being a unique blend of performance and durability. Muscle car fans, let’s hear your thoughts-what’s your favorite Ford FE engine? Drop your comments below, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters Let’s keep the roar of American muscle alive. Wishing you an amazing day and a Merry Christmas! Keep cruising, muscle fans
@@oldjarhead386 yes... of course, I got it...What a sharp eye, and you’re absolutely right-406 CID deserves its moment in the spotlight! As part of Ford's legendary FE engine family, the 406 was a true game-changer in the early 1960s, paving the way for big block performance. Introduced in 1962, this beast boasted a reinforced block and forged pistons, making it a favorite for racers back in the day. It laid the groundwork for the mighty 427 that followed-talk about a legacy of power have a good holiday...
I get the excitement around the Ford 410 FE, but let’s be real here-just talking about 141 mph and a blown engine doesn’t do the car justice. The 410's true strength lies in its powerband and torque delivery, not just raw speed. Pushing these engines too far without tuning or maintenance can lead to costly failures.
Wow, what a story, Lizard That 410 must’ve been a beast before it gave up the ghost. Sounds like Uncle Jack was living the full-throttle life-141 mph is no joke! The 410 FE engines were known for their torque and power, but it sounds like she pushed past her limits. Classic muscle cars have a way of creating legendary moments like this! What’s the next move? Rebuild it or find a new engine to keep the legacy alive? Let us know in the comments, everyone! Share your own stories, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more tales of American horsepower. Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you and yours
I get why some may not love the Y-block, but honestly, it deserves more respect. The Y-block had some serious engineering behind it, especially for its time. It might not have the raw power of later engines, but its smooth operation and history in early muscle cars can’t be ignored. It's part of the Ford legacy
Hey there, friend While the Y-block engine might not have been the most glamorous chapter in muscle car history, it laid the groundwork for the powerhouse engines we know and love today. Its sturdy design and reliability were key stepping stones for Ford's legendary FE and Windsor series. Plus, the Y-block was a workhorse in its day-something we can’t overlook in the evolution of V8 performance! What do you think about its role in shaping muscle car history? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to explore more American muscle car content on our channel, and remember to like, share, and subscribe to keep the spirit alive. Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas
I guess 410 is a unlucky number, the 410 Edsel engine was also a one-year wonder. The 410 engine was easy to produce, It was just a 390 block with a 428 Crank, the only thing special was the pistons with the right deck height.
Thanks for your comment, @mylanmiller9656
You’re absolutely right-the 410 engine was a one-year wonder and a fascinating piece of muscle car history. Edsel’s 410, a quick modification of the 390 block with a 428 crank, was indeed easy to produce. Those unique pistons for the right deck height really gave it character, but unfortunately, it didn’t stick around long enough to leave a massive legacy. However, that’s what makes it a hidden gem for true enthusiasts
The 410 reminds us of how experimental and innovative Ford was during the muscle car golden age, always pushing boundaries with power and performance. What’s your favorite one-year wonder engine or model? Let us know in the comments....
Everyone, don't forget to subscribe, like, and share the passion for American Muscle Cars with others who love these incredible machines.
Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas to you and all the car lovers out there
@@MuscleCarMasters68 You forgot the EDSEL 410 engine was not a FE. It was a MEL engine with a 430 Crank and a Special small-bore block. It was only in the large Mercury based Edsel, that was canceled at the end of the 1958 run.
@@mylanmiller9656 Thanks for your comment, @mylanmiller9656
the Edsel 410 was part of the MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, not the FE series, and it’s one of those engines that doesn’t get enough love. With its unique small-bore block and that 430 crank, it was built for the bigger Mercury-based Edsels, giving them solid torque and performance. Sadly, as you mentioned, it was short-lived, disappearing after the 1958 model year. But that’s what makes it special-an underrated powerhouse that only true enthusiasts recognize and appreciate
have a good day... waiting for your more information of Edsel 410 engine.
Nah, I’d call the 410 a hidden gem! Sure, it’s a 390 block with a 428 crank, but that combo gave it a unique personality. Plus, the Edsel 410 was part of Ford’s experimental phase, paving the way for legendary engines.
I recall the MEL 410 was supposed to debut in 1957 with the Mercury Turnpike Cruiser. Production issues delayed it until 1958, taking away any fanfare, placing it between the ho hum 383 and the livelier 430.
The Park Lane with the 410 is a rare gem, but it reminds me of the Fairlane V8 aka the 221 Windsor. It only lasted from '62 to May '63. Rare cars like yours always stand out...
You’re absolutely correct I forgot about the 221 in my reply to Cookezachery i helped a guy install one in a 63 fairlane and got it running for him in exchange for the 59 meteor I had bought and sold years ago that 221 is a heck of a good engine!
the Park Lane 410, it’s a rare gem and a true nod to Ford’s bold engineering
The Fairlane V8 (221 Windsor) was another short-lived but iconic piece of history, laying the groundwork for Ford’s legendary small-block engines. These rare classics, like the 410, always grab attention for their unique charm and incredible performance. What do you think makes these rare Ford V8s so unforgettable? Share your thoughts below
Don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters, share the channel with fellow fans, and keep the muscle car legacy alive.
Have a great weekend and a Merry Christmas
@roberthaygarth8525 That’s an awesome story, Robert
The 221 was indeed a groundbreaking engine-the first of the legendary Ford small-block family, setting the stage for the iconic 289 and 302. In a ’63 Fairlane, it must’ve roared with style and power! And trading for a ’59 Meteor? That’s some serious classic car hustle-love it! These stories remind us why we’re all here, celebrating these machines. Muscle car fans, drop your favorite engine swap stories in the comments
Let’s keep this community revved up-don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters.
Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
@@roberthaygarth8525 The 221 Windsor was solid for its time, no doubt, but let's be real-it was quickly outclassed. Ford's focus shifted to bigger and better engines like the 289, which set the foundation for the small-block legacy. The 221 paved the way, sure, but it wasn’t built to dominate like the beasts that followed.
@@KeithGreene-k1v ; The 289 Hi-Po debuted in the 1963 Fairlane Sports Coupe.
Love the 57" T-Bird fins and tail lights on the 63".
Funny thing though, they hadn't yet made accomodations for dual exhaust.
I built a 410 out of a 73 390 block with 406 heads, a high flow edelbrock intake, and a 750 CFM carb. add in a better cam and headers, and let me tell you, that motor turned my f250 into a torque monster.
Wow, what an absolute beast you’ve built! Using a ’73 390 block, 406 heads, and that high-flow Edelbrock intake is a recipe for pure torque. Pairing it with a 750 CFM carb, upgraded cam, and headers must have transformed your F250 into a true torque monster-sounds like it’s ready to rip up any road or trail! It’s builds like yours that keep the American muscle spirit alive, showcasing creativity, ingenuity, and raw power.
To all American muscle car fans out there: what’s your dream build, or what have you already built? Let’s hear your stories in the comments...Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel to dive deeper into the world of classic muscle power and keep this community thriving.
Thanks for sharing your incredible build, and wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
a guy could use any block from a 360 361 or a 390 to build a 410. My nephew installed a merc 410 crank pistons and rods in his 1958 Edsel 361
Pacer convertible. he didn't tell anybody it was not a stock 361. He also used a later FMX transmission to get 3 speeds.
@@mylanmiller9656 Wow, Swapping a Merc 410 crank, pistons, and rods into a 361 block is pure genius, especially in a classic ’58 Edsel Pacer convertible-that car must be an absolute sleeper! Pairing it with an FMX 3-speed just takes it to the next level of performance and drivability. It’s builds like these that remind us why American muscle cars are all about innovation, power, and style.
Have an amazing weekend and Merry Christmas
@@MuscleCarMasters68 my nephews Car had transmission problems like most Tel touch electric shifts. When he joined the Edsel club one guy on the sight give him all the information to install the FMX from a1968 390 wagon Galaxi. He also changed the Steering Colum, I am not sure what He the got it from to make the Select shifter work properly. He bought the 410 pistons and crank off eBay for Cheaper than he could have his 361-crank redone. His car even has the Distributor drive tach in it.
@@mylanmiller9656 Yes.... that’s an incredible build and a true testament to the ingenuity of muscle car enthusiasts! Swapping in the FMX transmission from a ’68 390 Galaxie wagon is a brilliant upgrade for reliability and performance, especially when paired with the Merc 410 crank and pistons. The fact that your nephew even incorporated the distributor drive tach adds a touch of vintage flair-talk about attention to detail! It’s these creative projects that keep the spirit of classic American muscle alive.
Have a fantastic day. hope to see you next videos...
The Mercury 410 High valve covers are cool
Absolutely
The Mercury 410's high valve covers are a true standout-adding to its bold and aggressive look that perfectly matches its powerhouse performance. Did you know those covers were designed for better clearance, making it a functional and stylish choice? This engine was part of the legendary Ford FE series, known for its durability and torque-a favorite for muscle car enthusiasts and racers alike. What’s your favorite Mercury engine, and how does it stack up to the 410?
Let us know in the comments
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more muscle car history. Wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
I get the appeal of the Mercury 410 high valve covers, but personally, I think the simplicity of the stock ones from the era has its own charm. Those big, flashy valve covers might steal the show, but sometimes it’s about the engine's raw power, not the flashy exterior.
Same as the 390 valve covers.
@@Steven-re3tx yes....
I get what you're saying about the flashy Mercury 410 valve covers, but I gotta say, there’s something about the stock ones that just feels right. They may not have the flash, but they scream pure, unrefined muscle.
@@v1-vr-rotatev2-vy_vx31
I have owned one.
Put it in a 74 Rancho and used it to pull another car,..my wife and daughter,..all our belongings to Motorcycles Mechanics Institute. From Anchorage Alaska to Phoenix Arizona.
I remember my Grandmother on my Dads side bought new full size Mercurys all through to 1969, every 2-3 years. She had an all white in an out with leather interior with the rear window at an angle that went down. The men in the family told me about the special 410 engine, that was quiet and smooth, that was almost like the 413 Golden Lion in my Dads 64 Imperial Crown Coupe.
Hey, I love hearing those family stories, but I gotta say, while the 410 in those Mercurys was smooth and powerful, it didn’t really have the raw edge that some of the other big-blocks of the era had. The 410 V8 was a solid engine, no doubt, but if you're talking true muscle car performance, that 413 Golden Lion in the Imperial Crown Coupe had a little more bite. It was built for both power and luxury, and while the Mercurys were impressive in their own right, they didn’t quite match the high-revving, high-performance powerhouses that guys like us look for in a muscle car.
@@AdelynDodson I get what you're saying, but I still think the 410 in those Mercurys had its own unique charm. Sure, it wasn’t a high-revving beast like the 413, but that smooth power made it a perfect cruiser. The 410 was about refined muscle, not just raw, brute force.
Great review I bought a 67 Mercury Convertible as a project. I wasn't aware of the 410 i thought it had a 390 until I went for parts. I was told the 390 with a 428 crank =410. The ragtop would burn the rubber off the wheels all day long.
Thanks for sharing your awesome project story
The '67 Mercury Convertible with a 410 is a true sleeper powerhouse-those FE engines are something special. You're spot-on about the 390 block with the 428 crank giving birth to the 410. With its high torque, it’s no wonder your ragtop could burn rubber all day long! We'd love to see how your build turns out, so keep us posted. Muscle car fans, what’s your dream project? Share in the comments
Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share the love for American Muscle Cars.
Have a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
Nice project, but gotta clarify something! While the 410 is a 390 block with a 428 crank, it's not just a parts-bin swap-it was factory-made for Mercurys. It’s underrated, though; less aggressive cam and compression than a 428, but still a torque monster! With the right tuning, your ragtop could be even meaner. Keep wrenchin
@@AdelynDodson Thanks for dropping some knowledge, the 410 is a factory-built torque beast that doesn’t get the recognition it deserves! Combining the 390 block and the 428 crank was a masterstroke by Mercury, creating an engine that’s perfect for effortless cruising and tire-shredding power. With its less aggressive cam and compression compared to a 428, it’s a hidden gem of the FE family, just waiting for the right tuning to unleash its full potential.
FE/FT engine displacements
Displacement Type Bore+0.0036/-0.0000 Stroke+/-0.004
330 cu in (5.4 L) FT 3.875 in (98.4 mm) 3.5 in (88.9 mm)
332 cu in (5.4 L) FE 4 in (101.6 mm) 3.3 in (83.8 mm)
352 cu in (5.8 L) 3.5 in (88.9 mm) 3.3 in (83.8 mm)
359 cu in (5.9 L) FT 4.05 in (102.9 mm) 3.5"
360 cu in (5.9 L) FE 4.05" 3.5"
361 cu in (5.9 L) FT 4.05" 3.5"
389 cu in (6.4 L) 4.05" 3.784 in (96.1 mm)
390 cu in (6.4 L) FE 4.05" 3.784"
391 cu in (6.4 L) FT 4.05" 3.786 in (96.2 mm)
396 cu in (6.5 L) FE 4.2328 in (107.5 mm) 3.514 in (89.3 mm)
406 cu in (6.7 L) 4.13 in (104.9 mm) 3.784 in (96.1 mm)
410 cu in (6.7 L) 4.05 in (102.9 mm) 3.984 in (101.2 mm)
427 cu in (7.0 L) 4.2328 in (107.5 mm) 3.784 in (96.1 mm)
428 cu in (7.0 L) 4.13 in (104.9 mm) 3.984 in (101.2 mm)
Let’s not forget Ford’s OHV debut in 1954. That year, the 239 V8 kicked things off, only to be replaced by the 272 and 292 by 1955. Short-lived but significant, just like the 410
Also don’t forget the Canadian 54 monarch and the 54 mercs had the 256 y block which were also one year only engines
You are right Ford had lots of First year engines that were increased by their second year, the 221v8 and the 144 inline 6 were examples of that.
Yes....Ford’s OHV debut in 1954 with the 239 V8 was a true game-changer, paving the way for the legendary 272 and 292 in 1955. It’s amazing how these engines, though short-lived, left a huge mark on American car history-just like the underrated 410. These powerhouses set the stage for the muscle car era we all love. What’s your favorite Ford V8, fans?
Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to share your thoughts, subscribe to Muscle Car Masters, and spread the love for American muscle cars.
Wishing you a fantastic weekend and a Merry Christmas
@roberthaygarth8525 Absolutely
The 1954 Canadian Monarch and Mercs with the one-year-only 256 Y-block were hidden gems in Ford's V8 evolution. These engines bridged the gap between the groundbreaking 239 OHV and the iconic 272 and 292 that roared into the muscle car spotlight. It's incredible how even these rarities contributed to the legacy of V8 power we celebrate today. What’s your all-time favorite Y-block or hidden gem in muscle car history? Drop your thoughts in the comments
Merry Christmas
@mylanmiller9656 Yes.... Ford's early engines, like the 221 V8 and 144 inline-6, were prime examples of innovation, paving the way for the iconic powerplants that followed. From the legendary small blocks to the mighty big blocks like the 428 Cobra Jet, Ford kept pushing the boundaries of performance. These engines didn't just power cars; they powered a revolution in American muscle history....
Back in 87 i bought a 76 ford f250 2wd off of my buddy. he had put a 410 in to replace the original 390. it only had a 2 barrel carb if i remember correctly and we had to chain down the motor because it had so much torque it kept tearing the motor mount. it was no speed demon but it could pull a load well. another one of them trucks i never should have sold.
Wow, what an incredible story about your '76 Ford F-250
Dropping in a 410 to replace the 390 was a bold move, especially with that monster torque tearing motor mounts-classic American power at its finest! Those trucks were absolute workhorses, built for hauling and never backing down. Sounds like you had a beast that was more than just a truck; it was a piece of muscle history. We all have those vehicles we never should’ve let go. What’s everyone else’s ‘one that got away’?
Drop your stories in the comments, share, and subscribe for more muscle car nostalgia.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
That’s an awesome story, but I gotta say, the 410 gets underrated for its potential. With the right upgrades-like a 4-barrel carb and better headers-that beast could’ve been a whole different animal. Torque’s great for towing, but this engine had room to shine in performance too. Sometimes it’s all about the setup
@@AdelynDodson the 410 is one of those engines that often gets overlooked but has untapped potential! With a 4-barrel carb, performance headers, and the right tuning, it could have been a true powerhouse on the strip as well as a towing champ. Ford's FE engines were built tough, and the 410 could hold its own with the right setup. It’s a reminder that performance is all about dialing in the perfect combo
My Sister had a 1966 Park Lane. Really nice. This was around 1972. Kind of a moroon metallic with frosty white leather interior. Ran strong and smooth. It would lay down some rubber it you floored it.
@johnharper2016 That 1966 Park Lane sounds like a dream
The maroon metallic with frosty white leather must have been a stunning combo-true luxury and muscle blended perfectly. And laying down rubber? That’s the kind of raw V8 power we love in classic American cars! Mercury really brought their A-game with that ride. It's awesome to hear memories like this because they highlight just how iconic these cars were in their time. Thanks for sharing your story!
What about the rest of you? Do you have a muscle car memory or a favorite ride from back in the day? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American muscle car history
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Hey, I get the appeal of that '66 Park Lane, but I gotta say, it wasn’t quite the muscle car a lot of people think it was. Sure, it had some power and style, but compared to the real heavy hitters of the time like the Mustang GT or Chevelle SS, it didn’t really pack the punch. Those cars were built for performance, not just luxury. Still, great memories though
Ford had other 2 year wonders. The FE 332. found in 1958 and 1959 Fords. And 1959 Edsels, The 58 Ford 332 was available with either a 2 or 4 barrel carburetor. The 1959 Ford and Edsel 332 only came with a 2 barrel carburetor, Also you had the 1958-59 Edsel 361 FE that came with a 4 barrel carburetor. This engine was also offered as a Ford Police car option.
Thank you for sharing this awesome info about the Ford FE 332 and Edsel 361
These two-year wonders are a hidden gem in Ford's history, showing how versatile the FE engine family really was. The 332’s mix of 2- and 4-barrel carb options made it stand out, and the Edsel 361 proves Ford had performance in mind even back then, especially with its Police car options. What do you think about these short-lived engines?
Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American Muscle Car history. Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
Love the passion, but let’s not sleep on the 332’s legacy-it wasn’t just a stepping stone. The 332 laid the groundwork for FE performance, proving itself as more than a two-year wonder. Plus, the Edsel 361 with the 4-barrel wasn’t just a police option; it paved the way for Ford’s police interceptor dominance later on
ford Degraded their Cars after 1958, The Edsel was top rung car in 1958 the smallest engine they had was a 361 4 barrel, For1959 you could get a 292 2 barrel, for 1960 you could get a 223 6 cylinder. Sure sounded like they were going in the wrong direction.
Also for 59 and 60, you could get a 223-I6
@@MuscleCarMasters68 A lot of people don't know it but, the Edsel 361 used the same block that Ford used to make 390, a 390 is a 361 with a stroker crank.
I knew these existed and yes, they are very scarce and they had excellent torque! I have seen a few of these.
Wow, you're absolutely right
The Ford 410 V8 is a true gem of the muscle car era, even if it was one of the shortest-lived engines Ford ever made. With its 4.05-inch bore and 3.98-inch stroke, it packed a solid punch, delivering incredible low-end torque-a hallmark of American muscle! These engines were mostly found in Mercury’s full-size models in 1966-67, making them a rare sight today. Spotting one is like finding a piece of American automotive history, and it's amazing you've seen a few of them
To all our fellow muscle car fans: what’s your take on the 410 V8? Have you seen one in action or worked on one yourself? Drop your thoughts in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe to the channel, share this with other gearheads, and keep the muscle car legacy alive
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
While it's true the Ford 410 V8 had incredible torque, I think we often overlook its complexity and reliability issues. Yes, it's rare, but its limited production and the engineering behind it were more about raw power than longevity. with other idea...
@@CookeZachery I get where you're coming from, but honestly, the Ford 410 V8's complexity is part of what makes it such a standout. Sure, it wasn't the most reliable in the long run, but the engineering behind it was ahead of its time.
I didn’t even know the 410 existed until now. I bet finding a new air cleaner decal for it would be next to impossible
Thanks for sharing your thoughts
The 410 is truly a hidden gem in the Ford lineup, a rare beast that left its mark despite its short run. You're absolutely right-finding a new air cleaner decal for it would be like hunting for treasure! But that’s what makes restoring these engines so rewarding-the thrill of preserving a piece of muscle car history. For all our fans, what’s the rarest muscle car part you’ve searched for? Share your stories in the comments
Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more American Muscle Car treasures with us.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
You can get anything custom made into a decal. Would be relatively easy to reproduce.
You can get anything custom made into a decal. Would be relatively easy to reproduce.
@@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 Yes... Getting a custom-made decal for the 410 would be a fantastic way to restore its authenticity and bring that hidden gem back to life! The Ford 410 is a rare piece of muscle car history, and it’s incredible to see enthusiasts like you keeping its legacy alive. That air cleaner decal may be small, but it’s the details like these that truly make a restoration shine.
Don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share the channel with friends who appreciate the roar of these legendary engines. Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas
@@dr.hugog.hackenbush9443 Actually, while custom decals are possible, finding an authentic 410 air cleaner decal is a whole different story. Originals are rare since the 410 was short-lived, only offered in '66 Mercurys. Reproductions might not match the exact specs or details enthusiasts crave. Sometimes, part of the hunt is embracing the rarity that makes these cars special
I always thought the 410 was Mercury's shortest lived engine. I didn't think the Ford 428 was already around. I think the 428 and the 410 both came out in 1966. The 428 police engine used the solid lifter camshaft and aluminum intake manifold from the 390 police engine. The big Cadillac and Lincoln engines were designed for low RPM smoothness, as was the Chrysler 440 engine. I suspect the 410 was geared in direction also. The Cadillac, Lincoln and 1966-67 Chrysler 440 engines received special assembly attention to run super smooth. Did the 410 get that king of attention? For 1968 the Chrysler 440 got the same type of standard assembly, that the rest of the Chrysler engines did. 1966 and 1967 440's were dynamically balanced, while later ones got standard static balancing. This was Chrysler way of making a big to compete with the Cadillac and Lincoln engines. Maybe the 410 got the same type of attention for smoothness.
428s came out in 66 in Galaxies badged "7 Litre" & were available through the 1970 model year. The 410 was only used in 66 & 67 Mercs.
The 410 was more about power and performance than refined smoothness like the Cadillac or Lincoln engines. Ford had a different design approach for their performance engines. The 410 was more aggressive in its application, focusing on torque and high RPMs rather than ultra-smooth low-end cruising.
@BrandonLeeBrown Great insights, Brandon
the 410 was indeed Mercury's shortest-lived engine, introduced in 1966 alongside the 428. However, while the 428 became a powerhouse in the Ford lineup, the 410 had a more niche role, emphasizing smoothness and torque over high-performance applications. It didn't receive the same meticulous assembly attention as the Cadillac, Lincoln, or early Chrysler 440 engines, but its direction was similar: smooth low-end power for luxury models like the Mercury. Ford saved the heavy-duty solid lifter and aluminum intake setup for its police and performance engines. What do you think-did the 410 deserve more spotlight? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe, share, and explore more American Muscle Cars.
Merry Christmas, and have a great day
The 3.98 stroke crank was first introduced for the 1966 model run so you are correct. Ford added the 3.98 stroker crank to both the 390 and 406 blocks to make the 410 and 428 the same year.
lots of guys added the 3.98 stroker crank to the 427 with a .030 over bore it made 453 CI. the problem was the crank was a Cast crank not forged so it limited RPM.
@@mylanmiller9656 I get where you’re coming from, but I gotta say, the 410 was never about raw RPMs or refinement. It was designed to deliver muscle in a big way-more about torque and power than high-revving smoothness like the 427 or the more refined, cruiser-type engines. Ford’s whole approach was to give it the grunt, the low-end torque, and the solid performance you could rely on in a muscle car, not necessarily the high-RPM revs that a cast crank in a 427 might give you.
Two Stances come to mind:
1). The Late Thities Mercury had a Flathead V8 with a series-exclusive stroker crank for extra pull and extra class.
2). The 410 served as a bridge, like the late-thirties flathead, to something greater. When the 428 could be marketed to the big Mercuries, it could be said to be an upgraded, smooth and quiet Mercury Engine. The bridge may have been a three-lane bridge compared to the four-lane bridge two blocks up the river, but it led to a quieter neighborhood.
Absolutely spot on! The late-thirties Mercury Flathead V8 was truly ahead of its time, delivering that perfect blend of power and elegance. That series-exclusive stroker crank gave Mercury a classy edge, carving out its place in automotive history. And speaking of bridges, the 410 FE was indeed a critical stepping stone-powerful enough to make a statement yet refined enough to pave the way for the legendary 428. It’s fascinating how these engines set the stage for Mercury’s reputation of smoothness and sophistication.
Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine evolution story? Let us know in the comments! And if you're passionate about muscle cars and their rich history, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars! Let’s keep the spirit of these classics alive together.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a very Merry Christmas
Keep roaring down the highway
While I get where you're coming from, I have to disagree a bit. The 410 V8 was more than just a stepping stone it was a powerhouse in its own right. Sure, the 428 eventually came in, but the 410 had its own unique character and raw power that set it apart. The Flathead had charm, but the 410 brought muscle to the forefront, a bridge to performance, not just refinement.
Buddy of mine had 67 Marauder with 410 motor . Big boat 😊😊
While I get the appeal of the '67 Marauder with the 410 motor, I’ve always felt those big boats weren’t as exciting as some of the more compact muscle cars from that era. Sure, they had power, but the handling and agility just weren’t there. Give me something like a '69 Mustang Mach 1 or even a Camaro any day for a more thrilling, responsive driving experience
Wow, your buddy's '67 Marauder with the 410 motor must have been an absolute beast
That 410 engine, part of Ford's FE series, packed serious power and torque-perfect for moving that stylish big boat with authority. The Marauder was all about commanding the road with elegance and muscle. Ford really nailed the balance between luxury and performance in the late '60s, making it a standout choice for enthusiasts who wanted both power and comfort.
What do you think about the 410 compared to other Ford FE engines, like the 390 or the legendary 428? We'd love to hear more stories about your buddy's Marauder-or maybe your own muscle car memories!
Don't forget to hit the like button, share your favorite muscle car experiences in the comments, and subscribe to our channel for more American Muscle Car content.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas, car enthusiast family
A 390 “stroker” who knew! Outstanding cross pollination of a FOMOCO
The 390 stroker is a beast and a great example of Ford’s ingenuity. Turning the classic FE block into a stroker shows just how versatile and powerful these engines can be. With the right mods, they can easily punch above their weight, delivering torque and performance that muscle car fans dream of. It’s cross-pollination like this that keeps the spirit of innovation alive in the muscle car community. What do you think about this setup? Share your thoughts and let us know your favorite builds
Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more
Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
I get where you're coming from, but honestly, I think a 390 stroker build isn't the best route for performance. Sure, it’s cool for showing off, but it’s not always the best choice for reliability or longevity. A stock 390 with some fine-tuning or even a 428 is more balanced and still delivers that raw muscle car feeling.
I wish I still had that old dentside pick up. If I had internet back then this was in the 90s. I still had it. Beautiful tall valve covers with the word Mercury and the lightning bolt threw it. I painted the valve covers red. The lettering black. And the silver lightning bolt Looking at it in that old Dent side. People used to ask if it was a four sixty People used to ask if it was a 460.
Your description of the Mercury valve covers with the lightning bolt is pure muscle car artistry-red, black, and silver?
Classic and bold! That dentside must have been a head-turner. The fact people asked if it was a 460 just goes to show how much power and presence that Ford 410 V8 had, even though it was one of Ford's shortest-lived engines. That big-block beast, part of the FE family, really packed a punch in its day! Those were the golden days when craftsmanship and innovation were everything.
To all our fellow enthusiasts: what are your memories of classic trucks or engines like this? Share them in the comments! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more American Muscle Car history on our channel.
Keep those stories rolling in, and have a great day
Merry Christmas
I can definitely see the nostalgia for those old Dent-side pickups, but honestly, I think we need to give more credit to the true performance side of things. Sure, the 460’s a beast, but it’s not just about the looks or the paint jobs. It's the power, torque, and performance that define an American muscle car.
I agree, there was no need for a 410 when Ford already had 390s and 428s.
I get where you're coming from, but the 410 V8 wasn't just a bigger engine; it was Ford's way of bridging the gap between the 390 and 428, offering a unique balance of performance. It wasn’t about redundancy, it was about refining that extra punch. The 410 wasn’t just a step up; it was Ford’s muscle evolution in the FE series.
@bruceallen6016 You're absolutely right, Bruce
Ford's 410 often gets overlooked because the 390 and 428 were already legends in the FE lineup. But here’s a fun fact for muscle car enthusiasts: the 410 was actually a unique offering, created by pairing the 428’s crankshaft with the 390’s bore-a true blend of torque and practicality. While it didn’t shine in performance circles, its place in Mercury models showed Ford's knack for versatility. What do you think-should Ford have doubled down on the 410, or was the 390/428 combo unbeatable? Let us know in the comments! Keep sharing your thoughts, and don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more nostalgia and horsepower.
Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
Ford didn't have a 428 before 1966, when the 3.98 stroker crank was released, it was put into both the 390 and 406 block to make the 410 and 428.
@@mylanmiller9656 I get what you're saying, but I still gotta disagree a bit. The 410 wasn’t just a filler engine-it was a stepping stone in Ford’s muscle car evolution. It was about refining performance, not redundancy. It offered a sweet spot between the 390 and 428, balancing power and drivability perfectly.
Just to hear the 427cid get referred to as "uncivilized". Made clicking on this worth it.
The 410 FE is a powerhouse too-more torque down low, smoother delivery, and a real sleeper when tuned right. It's not all about peak RPMs. Sometimes, it's the grunt that gets the job done, and the 410's got plenty of that.
Just another FE engine. Not much of a Ford guy myself. I always liked the 351 Cleveland or 400 Modified engines. The '79 Bronco came with that Modified. With headers and an aftermarket aluminum intake manifold. Those engines could be fun with a 4 speed. Certainly one of the last decent engines Ford offered, before emissions ravaged power output.
@andrewbecker3700 Thanks for sharing your thoughts
The 427cid definitely has that raw, "uncivilized" charm that muscle car fans can’t resist. It’s true, the FE engines are iconic, but the 351 Cleveland and 400 Modified have their own special place in Ford’s performance history. The 351 Cleveland’s high-flow heads were ahead of their time, and the 400 Modified with headers and an aluminum intake was a torque monster, especially in rigs like the '79 Bronco! You’re spot on-those were the days before emissions started taming engines. What’s your favorite memory of driving a Ford V8? Let us know! Don’t forget to comment, share, and subscribe for more American muscle car stories.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
@@andrewbecker3700 @andrewbecker3700 I get where you're coming from, but don’t sleep on the FE engines. The 410 FE may not have the high-rev party that the 351 Cleveland or 400 Modified do, but it's got a serious low-end torque punch that makes it a true sleeper. With the right tuning, the 410 can outpull a lot of those high-RPM engines in the real world. It’s not just about top-end; it's about raw power when you need it.
Not so. There was another 410 in 1958 for that year only used only on the 58 Edsel Corsair and Citation. It was an underbored version of the 430 Lincoln MEL engine. IT was Ford's shortest-lived V8. The 410 FE used in the 66 - 67 Mercs was the second-shortest, and the third-shortest, I think, is the 383 MEL engine, used in many 58, 59, and 60 Mercurys.
Thanks for the awesome info and for pointing that out
You're absolutely right-the 1958 Edsel 410 was indeed a unique beast. It was part of the MEL family, sharing DNA with the 430 Lincoln engine but with that smaller bore to create the 410. What a fascinating piece of Ford history! And as you said, it was super short-lived, making it a true gem for collectors and enthusiasts.
The 410 FE from ’66-’67 Mercs, though, holds its own as part of the legendary FE series, known for powering some serious muscle. And that 383 MEL? Another forgotten powerhouse that tells the story of Mercury’s bold experiments in the late '50s.
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Interesting take, but let’s not forget the 410 FE wasn't just a Merc exclusive. It bridged the gap between the 390 and 428, offering unique torque for mid-tier performance. Also, while the MEL engines were short-lived, they were beasts in their time.
Lest we forget. Robert Strange McNamara was the ramrod at FOMOCO in the late 1950s. That can of worms is now open. He was the reason for 2v carburetors (he saw no need for 4v carbs) on large displacement engines like the 430 and 462, limiting their performance, standardization of Lincoln, Ford, and Mercury drive trains, etc. Had he stayed on with Ford, no performance engines would've been produced, no Mustangs, Cougars, Shelbys, GT 40s, Boss 302, etc. FOMOCO would've been another Rambler.
You’re absolutely right
Robert Strange McNamara had a significant impact on Ford during his tenure, and his conservative approach certainly left its mark. While he streamlined production and improved efficiency, his reluctance to embrace performance engineering could have steered Ford in a very different direction. Thankfully, with leaders like Lee Iacocca taking the reins, the performance era exploded with legends like the Mustang, Shelby GT350, and Boss 302! Imagine a world without these iconic muscle machines-it’s almost unthinkable for us enthusiasts.
What’s your take? Would Ford have survived the muscle car era without its legendary lineup? Let us know in the comments below, and don’t forget to share, like, and subscribe to celebrate American Muscle Cars with us.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
While I see the point, McNamara's influence on Ford wasn't all bad. Sure, the 2v carb limitations stifled performance, but his drive for efficiency and standardization helped streamline production, making cars more affordable. Had Ford not embraced those changes, it might've struggled to keep up in the muscle car era.
I had one some one put in a 1972 F250 high boy. torque broke "u" joints and yokes damn that was fun
While I get the fun of that 1972 F250 Highboy, I've gotta say, it's not always the best idea to push that kind of torque to the limits without reinforcing key parts. Trust me, I’ve seen way too many trucks and muscle cars with broken U-joints and yokes. It’s awesome when it holds up, but I’d recommend beefing up the driveline before going full throttle - you’ll save yourself a lot of headaches down the road
Wow, what an epic story
A 1972 F250 High Boy with that kind of torque must’ve been an absolute beast! The power of those old-school trucks truly shows what American engineering was all about-raw strength and durability. Breaking U-joints and yokes? That’s the kind of fun only gearheads can fully appreciate. Have any pictures or more tales of that monster? We'd love to hear more! And hey, everyone, share your own muscle car stories in the comments below. Don’t forget to subscribe, like, and join our channel for more American Muscle greatness.
Wishing you a great day and Merry Christmas
My parents had a 1966 Mercury Colony Park station wagon. I remember it had this engine.
The 1966 Mercury Colony Park is a classic example of American ingenuity, blending style and power. If it had the legendary FE V8 under the hood, your parents were driving a masterpiece of engineering from that era. The FE engines, known for their reliability and torque, were a favorite in both performance and utility vehicles. We’d love to hear more about your memories with that beauty-what was it like to ride in such a powerhouse?
Share your thoughts in the comments, and don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more muscle car history with us.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
*390 with a 428 crank ...*
Respect to the 390/428 crank combo, but the 410’s factory setup deserves more credit. It’s a legit piece of Ford’s history-basically a performance experiment bridging the gap to the 428. Sure, the 428 crank swap adds muscle, but the stock 410 had its own swagger, especially for Mercury fans.
Thanks for sharing that
You’re absolutely right-putting a 428 crank into a 390 block is essentially the blueprint for the Ford 410 V8. This powerhouse was part of the Ford FE series and only had a short production run in 1966-1967, primarily found in Mercury models like the S-55 and Monterey. While it didn’t get the same fame as the 428 or 427, the 410 packed serious torque and exemplified Ford’s creativity in engine design during the muscle car golden era.
What do you think about the 410 V8? Should it have been developed further or even made its way into more cars? Drop your thoughts below! And if you’re into American Muscle Cars, don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share our channel with other fans. Keep the muscle car spirit alive
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
Let’s celebrate our love for classics together
@@MuscleCarMasters68 *_The 410 had the smoothest idle of all the "FE" Fords. Something about its bore and stroke combo that just balanced out harmonically. They could pass the LEXUS's nickel on the motor test back in the '60s. Made good power and torque too._** Did any of McGarrett's Mercs have a 410 in it? hahaha LOL*
@@Imnotyourdoormat Thanks for the great insight
something about that bore and stroke combo made the 410 FE one of Ford's smoothest performers. Its balance and power were unmatched for its time. McGarrett's Mercs might not have had the 410, but imagine the crime-fighting style with one under the hood! LOL. The 410 deserved more spotlight-its torque and creativity scream classic Ford ingenuity. What do you all think?
Have an awesome day and Merry Christmas
Didn’t Ford have a 255 V-8, that was offered in the Fairmonts and Futuras?
Yes, I forgot the years it was produced ( late 70s/early 80s ). It was used in quite a few Fox chassis cars.
@@hoost3056Thanks.
I would say it was late 70’s to 80’s as well. I had a guy i used to work with had one. From what i remember they were decent little V-8’s. It was when Glidden was running the Futura in Pro Stock. Maybe someone with some more info will chime in?
Great question, and you're absolutely right
Ford did offer the 255 V8, part of the Windsor engine family, in the early 1980s for models like the Fairmont and Futura. This small-displacement V8 was designed for fuel economy during the energy crisis, but it still carried that iconic American V8 heritage. Producing around 115 horsepower, it wasn’t a high-performance engine like the legendary 302 or 351 Windsor, but it played a key role in keeping the V8 alive during tough times for muscle car fans.
What do you think about Ford’s approach during the fuel crisis? Were these engines a smart move, or do you think they should’ve focused more on performance? Let us know in the comments below!
Don’t forget to check out more on American Muscle Cars, share this with your friends, and subscribe to the channel for more great content.
Have a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
the 255 V8 being in the Fairmonts and Futuras, but let's not confuse it with true muscle. The 255 was a low-performance engine designed for economy during the downsizing era. It doesn’t belong in the same league as the classic high-performance small-blocks or big-blocks that define muscle car heritage. Just my take
@@MuscleCarMasters68 Thanks! And Merry Christmas to you as well!
I had one of those. I put it in my seventy three f two fifty That son of a con made some talk That sound of a gun made some torque.
I get what you're saying, but honestly, I've always been more about the balance than the brute force. Sure, the raw torque is fun, but the handling and finesse of a well-tuned engine make all the difference in my book. Don't get me wrong, power's great, but a smooth, responsive ride is what truly makes a muscle car special.
Well, I already had a 64 Galaxy with a small block.I didn't need another car.I really needed that truck running.Let me tell you that thing would tear up some ground
@@AdelynDodson I hear you, but I gotta disagree. Muscle cars are about that raw, unfiltered power. Sure, handling’s nice, but when you drop the hammer and feel that engine roar, that’s what defines a muscle car. A tight ride is cool, but nothing beats the thrill of torque and horsepower pushing you back in your seat.
@forestlawrencegrading9154 Wow, what a story! Dropping that powerhouse into your ‘73 F-250 must’ve turned it into a beast! That’s the beauty of American muscle-it's all about raw power, torque, and versatility. The fact that it could "tear up some ground" shows the magic of those engines-they're made for performance and durability, whether it's in a classic Galaxie or a workhorse truck. Sounds like you made the perfect call putting that engine to work where you needed it most.
Share your thoughts and experiences in the comments below
Let’s keep celebrating the heart and soul of American muscle. And don’t forget-like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more amazing stories, history, and nostalgia
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas to you and your family
I like watching 410 sprint cars.
Thanks for sharing
Sprint cars, especially the 410s, are a thrilling spectacle of power and precision-just like the legendary muscle cars we love. Did you know that many sprint car engines share the same high-performance roots as American muscle car engines? That raw horsepower, thundering down the track, is what keeps fans like us coming back for more. Speaking of power, what's your favorite muscle car? Let us know in the comments! And don’t forget to explore more incredible American Muscle Cars on our channel-your one-stop destination for history, performance, and passion.
Like, share, and subscribe to join the community of true enthusiasts.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas full of horsepower dreams
Nothing in common with this!
410 may be rare, but how about the 221 Windsor? Introduced in '62 and gone by mid-'63, it’s another contender for Ford’s shortest lived V8. Coincidentally, its 221 cubic inches matched the original flathead V8...
Great point about the 221 Windsor
Introduced in '62 and phased out by mid-'63, it’s another Ford gem that’s often overshadowed. As Ford’s first small-block V8, it paved the way for the legendary Windsor family, including the iconic 289 and 302. The 221 may have been short-lived, but its role in muscle car history is undeniable. Pairing it with the flathead V8's displacement was a nod to Ford’s legacy
What do you all think? Let us know in the comments, and don’t forget to share and subscribe for more American muscle car history.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
@@AilaniMadden My dad drove a '63 Fairlane 500 couple hundred thousands of miles with the 221ci, three on the column with overdrive.
@@CBX1980 I get where you're coming from, but I gotta say, the 221 Windsor doesn’t get enough love. Yeah, it was short-lived, but it had some potential for its time, especially in the early '60s. Sure, the 410 FE's a standout for rarity, but Ford didn’t exactly leave the 221 out in the cold, it’s part of the evolution of their V8 lineup and deserves more recognition.
@AilaniMadden The 221 was listed as part of the 90°V family, along with the 260, 289, 302,and 351 before the Cleveland (335 series) was produced. That 221 was the starting point of all Ford small blocks. The first with the thin wall casting, skirtless block. Carroll Shelby took notice and advantage of these, and the first Cobras were 260 powered. These designs made Ford and kept Ford in the 60s. A LOT of full-size cars (and trucks) were small block powered. I agree the 221 started a great thing. No first gen Mustang or Cougar would've been V8 powered without the small block. Thanks for the reply.
@@CBX1980 I see what you're saying, but I have to disagree a bit. While the 221 Windsor gets credit for being a starting point, it’s important to remember it was really a stepping stone to better performance. The 260 and 289 made bigger waves, and the 221 just didn’t have the torque and power the later small blocks did. The FE engines, like the 390, were the real muscle behind Ford’s dominance in the '60s.
I drove one and its the best fucking thing ford ever did!
The Ford 410 V8 might not have lasted long, but it was a masterpiece in its time. Built as part of the FE engine family, the 410 was introduced in 1966 and was basically a mix of power and smooth performance, thanks to its unique bore and stroke design. It delivered 330 horsepower and a staggering 444 lb-ft of torque, making it a beast under the hood of iconic cars like the Mercury Cyclone GT. Ford truly outdid itself, blending raw power with smooth drivability. It’s a shame it didn’t stick around longer, but it left a lasting impression on muscle car enthusiasts like us.
What do you think? Should Ford have developed it further?
Let us know in the comments below! And don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share the love for American muscle cars.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you
I get the power and performance angle, but I’d argue the 410 wasn’t just about raw aggression. Ford’s approach was about balance, torque and smooth power delivery. It’s not all about high RPMs; a muscle car still needs that low-end grunt for real-world driving. The 410 gave you the best of both worlds.
Wow born from the 428/390,who would of known,good ear candy love it.
You're absolutely right
The legendary 428 and 390 engines are the heart and soul of American muscle car history, delivering that iconic sound we all love-true ear candy for enthusiasts like us! These engines weren’t just about raw power; they defined an era of innovation and dominance on the streets and the track. Thanks for sharing your excitement! What’s your favorite engine or muscle car memory? Let’s keep the conversation going in the comments
Don’t forget to share the love for American Muscle Cars, subscribe to our channel, and join the community.
Have an awesome weekend and a Merry Christmas
I get the love for the 428/390, but don’t sleep on the 410 V8-it's got a unique history that doesn't always get the spotlight. It’s more than just ear candy, it’s about that raw, untapped power.
I owned a 67 Mercury Monterey in the early 90s with 410. They were okay but the distributor was a problem. The rod to the oil pump was week also and would strip out causing oil pump to fail. My 419 had that problem and threw 2 rods. Too bad for my Mercury car. I car to the junk yard after that.
Wow, owning a '67 Mercury Monterey with a 410 is a story worth telling
That 410 FE engine was a powerhouse for its time, even if it came with some quirks like the weak distributor gear and that pesky oil pump rod. It’s tough to hear your Monterey faced such a dramatic end-it’s a reminder of how vital proper maintenance and upgrades were for these classics. For enthusiasts today, modern aftermarket upgrades can address those weak points, keeping these legends alive and roaring on the road.
To everyone reading, what’s your experience with the 410 or other FE engines? Let us know in the comments below! Keep sharing your stories and love for these American classics. Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share with your fellow gearheads to keep the muscle car legacy strong
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you and all Muscle Car fans...
Hey, I get your frustration with those issues, but I’ve got to disagree on calling the 410 V8 a letdown. Sure, some components like the distributor and oil pump rod had their flaws, but when running right, that engine was a powerhouse. The Mercury Monterey's design was solid, and with proper maintenance, it could’ve gone a lot longer. Just needed some TLC
This is the equivalent of a Chevy 396, 4.094 bore, with a 454 4.00 stroke. Some of the newer LS Chevies are similar design. This looks like a candidate for NHRA Stock/Super Stock! Like the kid said what you need is some freakin' torque!
Longer stroke hurts HP & TQ. ALL racing engines follow a basic design. "Run the largest bore the achitecture will accomodate & then put in the stroke needed to reach the displacement goal. Use whatever length rod is needed to connect the CS to the pistons, as rod length has almost zero affect on TQ & HP." Oversquare always makes more power than undersquare & a short stroke big bore engine will always make more TQ & HP than a longer stroke/smaller bore engine of the the same displacement. The reason for this is that the additional piston speed creates much more friction & the smaller bore impedes the airflow. Do the math for "piston speed". Use 3.25" & 3.5" strokes @ any RPM but it's pretty simple. @ 10000 RPM, the pistons EACH travel 5,833 ft with a 3.5" stroke & 5416 FT with w 3.25" stroke. The 8 pistons must "travel" 5/8 of a mile further in 1 minute with the longer stroke. That's a lot of friction since almost all of the parasitic drag in an engine is caused by the piston rings! The emissions engines built since the early 70 are still oversquare but they increased the stroke & reduced the bore, not for performance but rather, to more efficiently control emissions. The GM LS engines perform so well because GM dramatically increased the intake port volume in them. The lowly 4.8 LS has 200cc intake port volume, which is more than 15% larger than any Gen 1 small block production line head, which was 170cc.
@@bradgriffith4231 I forgot the LOL at the end. Sorry.
I get where you're coming from, but I think you're overlooking the charm of the older setups. The 410 FE might not have the sheer torque numbers of a newer LS, but it's got character and a vintage muscle car feel that modern engines just can't replicate.
@JohnW1711stock Absolutely, you nailed it
Combining the 4.094 bore with the 4.00 stroke makes for a powerhouse setup, reminiscent of the legendary Chevy 396 and big-block 454’s brute force. This blend delivers that earth-shaking torque perfect for NHRA Stock/Super Stock domination. And you're right-torque is king! LS engines carry that innovative Chevy spirit forward, proving muscle never goes out of style. What do you think, fans? Got any favorite builds or setups that deliver insane torque? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more thrilling content.
We appreciate your support and wish you a great day and a Merry Christmas filled with horsepower dreams
@bradgriffith4231 Excellent breakdown of stroke, bore, and piston speed
You’re absolutely right that oversquare engines dominate performance builds, especially in racing. In muscle cars, legendary engines like the 426 HEMI and GM LS engines prove how crucial airflow and bore size are for making power. Those Gen 1 small blocks, while iconic, paved the way for today's high-performance tech. And you're spot on about piston speed-friction is the silent killer of horsepower! The LS series revolutionized modern muscle with those larger intake ports, ensuring airflow meets the demand for speed and torque.
What do you all think? Share your insights and favorite engines below! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share with other muscle car fans.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
The engine was later resurrected for the customized version of the 1967 Shelby GT500 around the year 2000 for the movie Gone In 60 Seconds, Eleanor.
You’re absolutely right
The Ford 410 V8 found new life in the legendary Eleanor from Gone In 60 Seconds. It’s incredible how this engine, though short-lived in its original production run, became a star decades later. The 410’s unique blend of torque and performance made it the perfect choice for Eleanor, a car that symbolizes everything we love about American muscle: raw power, stunning design, and a legacy that never fades.
What’s your favorite moment with Eleanor in Gone In 60 Seconds? Let us know in the comments! And while you’re here, don’t forget to hit that like button, subscribe for more muscle car history and engine spotlights, and share this video with fellow fans of American muscle.
Wishing you an awesome day and a Merry Christmas
Actually, the 410 engine wasn’t resurrected for Eleanor in Gone in 60 Seconds. That GT500 used a 351 Windsor stroked to 408 ci. It’s a common misconception, but the 410 was more of a one-off FE engine from 1966. Eleanor’s heart leaned more toward modern performance tweaks than a true 410 revival.
@@AdelynDodson Hey, I get where you're coming from, but here's the thing: While it’s true the 351 Windsor was in Eleanor, there's more to the story. The 410 FE engine, in its original form, was never completely forgotten. It was actually revived for the custom Eleanor build, making that iconic muscle car even more of a legend.
The engine in the Movie car was a 351 W engine with a 4 inch stroker Crank, it was not a FE.
@@mylanmiller9656 Yes....While the 351W stroked to 408ci is the engine they used in Eleanor, it’s important to remember that the 351W and the FE engines are very different beasts. The FE series, especially the 410, was built for different performance goals back in the 60s. The 351W, while a great engine, is a much more modern design with a different architecture.
I was able to purchase a 410 a few years back with the automatic transmission ,I’m always looking for some project to use it in
That’s an awesome score
The Ford 410 with an automatic transmission is a solid powerhouse-a rare gem from the FE family that’s just waiting to unleash its torque. Whether you’re thinking of restoring a classic Galaxie, building a custom hot rod, or surprising everyone with a unique project, that 410 is ready to rumble. What ideas are you leaning toward? Let’s hear your thoughts
And to all the fans out there, drop a comment with your dream builds, share this post, and don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more gearhead content.
Have a great weekend and Merry Christmas
@ I bought the whole car just for the engine , it came out of a 67 mercury, this the second one I’ve owned. The first one I. Turned it into a 428, bore it 080 thousand, the c6me-a and c7me-a block is ok to bore 80 thousand , I did that almost twenty years ago , put the engine in a 1968 GT fastback , I’ve still got the fastback Never no problems
@@FredCombs-j7o That’s incredible... Owning not just one, but two 410 V8s is a testament to your passion for the FE family. The work you did turning the first one into a 428 is the stuff of legends-boring it out to .080” is no small feat! That engine paired with a 1968 GT Fastback? Absolute perfection. The fact that you’ve had it for decades and it’s still running strong speaks volumes about your craftsmanship and Ford’s bulletproof engineering. The C6ME-A and C7ME-A blocks were truly built to last, weren’t they?
thank you so much and have a great day.
That's awesome you snagged a 410 with an automatic! But here’s a thought-why not embrace its roots? The 410 was built for torque, especially in heavy cruisers like the Mercury Monterey. Dropping it into a classic full-size ride could keep the spirit alive while giving you a beastly highway cruiser. What do you think?
@@MuscleCarMasters68 I’ve got a 63 galaxy XL missing the motor and tranny, but I do have a64 XL complete with a bad tranny, those are both good candidates
I'm surprised by the information in this video. My 1959 Edsel 13 passenger wagon has the 410 engine in it. I remember having to buy the rebuild kit for it from JC Whitney because it was such a rare engine you could not get parts for it anywhere else in 1987. It was an awesome engine though, even in such a heavy car.
Interesting take, but honestly, I don't think the 410 engine in the Edsel was the best fit for that heavy wagon. Sure, it had power, but the weight of that car made it sluggish, and parts were tough to come by, even back in the day. The 332 FE or 390 would have been a better choice for more performance without the hassle.
So great...A 1959 Edsel 13-passenger wagon with the Ford 410 V8-now that's a rare gem
The 410 was a unique powerhouse, part of the FE family, and it’s fascinating to hear about your experience rebuilding it. JC Whitney sure was a lifesaver back in the day for sourcing those hard-to-find parts. With its impressive torque and smooth performance, the 410 was definitely underrated, even in a car as hefty as the Edsel wagon. It’s great to see someone keeping the spirit of this rare engine alive!
To all our fellow muscle car enthusiasts, what’s your story with the 410 or other short-lived engines? Share your thoughts in the comments below! And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more deep dives into the history of American Muscle Cars.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
Airport limo? I have a 59 Villager. And mine is a 9 passenger.
my dad's '67 Parklane had this engine, other's said it didn't exist
Hey, I get the passion, but I gotta say, there’s a bit of confusion here. The '67 Parklane didn’t come with the FE 410 V8 as a factory option. It’s possible someone swapped it in later, but Ford didn’t offer it in that model. Some fans mix up engine swaps with factory specs, so it’s important to check the car’s history. Just wanted to clear that up for the real muscle fans
Your dad’s '67 Parklane had the legendary 410 V8? That’s incredible
The Ford 410 V8 is one of those engines that gets car enthusiasts talking because of its rarity. Introduced in 1966, it was part of the Ford FE family and produced for only two years, making it a true gem in muscle car history. Built for torque, it boasted a 4.05-inch bore and a 3.98-inch stroke, packing 345 horsepower and 450 lb-ft of torque-a powerhouse perfect for full-sized cars like the Parklane. Some folks doubt its existence because it was quickly overshadowed by the 428, but you’ve got the story to prove otherwise!
What about you, muscle car fans? Have you or someone you know experienced this rare engine? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to share, like, and subscribe to celebrate American muscle cars.
Have a great day and a Merry Christmas
the '67 Parklane didn’t come with the FE 410 V8 as a factory option. It’s possible it was swapped in later, which makes your dad’s story even more intriguing. Engine swaps were pretty common back in the day, especially for enthusiasts looking to pack more power under the hood. The FE 410, introduced in 1966 and built for torque with 345 horsepower and 450 lb-ft, was a favorite for performance upgrades. If it ended up in a Parklane, someone had a keen eye for muscle car greatness
For a short while my '58 Edsel Citation had this engine. I think it had 310 or 320 HP.
I get where you're coming from, but I have to disagree on the horsepower estimate for the '58 Edsel Citation. From what I’ve researched, the original engine options were a 361 cubic inch V8, but it was more in the 303 HP range.
I get what you're saying about the '58 Edsel Citation, but honestly, that engine's HP might be a bit off. The 410 V8 in the Edsel actually had around 303-310 hp, depending on the exact specs. It’s a good engine, but not as wild as some might think, especially compared to the bigger FE blocks Ford came out with later on.
Wow, the ‘58 Edsel Citation with that engine is an absolute gem
If it had the Super Express V8 (410 cubic inches), it likely packed 345 HP with 475 lb-ft of torque. That powerhouse was part of Ford’s MEL engine lineup, designed to deliver smooth power with a touch of elegance, perfect for a premium cruiser like the Citation. Back in the day, these engines symbolized the era’s bold engineering, blending muscle and luxury. Your Edsel must’ve been a real head-turner!
American muscle cars like the Edsel remind us why we love this era so much-raw power, unique designs, and unforgettable road presence. What’s your best memory behind the wheel of your Citation? Share your story with us, and let’s keep the conversation alive! Everyone, join the community by commenting, sharing, and subscribing for more classic muscle content.
Have an amazing day, and Merry Christmas to you
I built one of these engines and put it in a f-350 that had a 360 25 years ago.
Sheesh, posted the same message on the other "410FE is the shortest Ford engine ever" video that this is yet more from the Ford illiterate. There were several other two-year engines including the 410MEL, 361FE, 406FE and so forth so there's no truth to the 410FE being the shortest. As a matter of fact, that title belongs to several others including the one-year 256 Y-block, one-year M-code 351-4V Windsor, one-year Y-code 352-4V solid lifter, one-year G-code 332-4V and no doubt others. Please leave history to those who care about the actual facts.
Hey, I get where you're coming from, but I think there's a bit of confusion here. While there are other engines that are shorter in certain specs, the 410FE is still a standout in the FE family when considering its overall performance and specific design. It’s not just about length-it’s about how that engine was built to perform. Let's appreciate each engine’s uniqueness, even if they're not all "shortest."
the 410 FE was a good idea but it was far from Shortest lived engine there are some that only lasted 1 year. Most were first model year engines that were replaced by larger engines of teh same design.
@@mylanmiller9656 Hey, I totally get the enthusiasm around the 410 FE, but I have to say, calling it one of the "shortest-lived" engines might be a bit off. Sure, it didn’t stick around long, but that doesn't mean it didn't leave an impact. Many of those "one-year wonders" were part of a bigger shift in engine design, with manufacturers constantly pushing the envelope for performance and efficiency. The 410 FE, while brief, was unique for its specific role in the FE lineup, and its performance still earned respect in the muscle car world.
Thanks for the detailed comment and sharing your insights! You’re absolutely right-Ford’s history is rich with engines that had short production runs, and it’s great to see someone passionate about keeping those facts alive. The 410 FE often gets misrepresented, and your list highlights just how many unique engines Ford developed over the years, from the 256 Y-block to the rare 406 FE. These engines played a pivotal role in shaping Ford’s legacy in performance and innovation.
Have a fantastic day, and Merry Christmas to you and all our muscle car fans out there
@MylanMiller9656
Thanks for the awesome insight! You’re spot on-the 410 FE wasn’t the shortest-lived engine in Ford’s lineup, and it’s incredible how many one-year wonders came and went in muscle car history. Engines like the 428 CJ and the Boss 302 are often remembered, but Ford’s experimental gems, like the 221 Windsor or the 406 FE, paved the way for future powerhouses. These short-lived engines might not have stuck around, but their impact on American performance history is undeniable. It’s always amazing to see fans like you keeping this knowledge alive.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
Years ago i remember seeing a 410 in a Thunderbird, did Ford put the 410 in the Thunderbird, or was that simone's creation?
Hey, I totally get the nostalgia for the 410, but Ford never actually put that engine in the Thunderbird. The Thunderbird was more about luxury and performance, but it never saw the 410 V8 in its lineup. Some enthusiasts might’ve swapped it in, but that would’ve been a custom job. Ford’s FE engine family was more common in bigger cars like the Galaxie or even the F-series trucks. Just a heads up
Great memory
Yes, the 410 V8 did find its way into the 1966 Ford Thunderbird, but only for a short time. The 410 was part of Ford's FE engine family and shared its foundation with the 390 and 428 engines. It featured a 4.05-inch bore and a 3.98-inch stroke, delivering around 345 horsepower and 460 lb-ft of torque. The 410 was primarily intended for Mercury vehicles like the Park Lane, but Ford equipped some Thunderbirds with it as well, likely to appeal to those who wanted a balance of power and luxury. While it wasn’t the most common engine, its smooth torque delivery made it perfect for the Thunderbird’s refined yet muscular character.
What do you think of Ford’s choice? Share your thoughts and memories below! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more about American Muscle Cars on our channel.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
I'm pretty sure, but not positive that Mercury snuck a few 410's into their Canadian only made pick up trucks. I'd sure love to have one of those !!!
Wow, that’s a fantastic piece of history you’re bringing up
Mercury’s Canadian-made pickups are a hidden gem in automotive history. The Mercury M-Series, exclusive to Canada, often borrowed from Ford’s playbook but added unique touches to stand out. While the 410 engine was primarily seen in select Mercury and Ford passenger cars, there’s a possibility a few of these powerhouses made their way into Mercury pickups, given Canada’s knack for blending models back then. It’s definitely worth exploring further
Can you imagine cruising in one of those Mercury pickups with a 410 V8 under the hood? That’s muscle and history combined! If anyone here has more info or stories about these Canadian trucks, drop it in the comments-we’d love to hear from you!
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more American muscle car history.
Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas
@@MuscleCarMasters68 ---- I'm from Wisconsin, and used to go to a fishing camp in lower Ontario for many years. In the early 80's, they had a Mercury truck (among others) that we would drive to the various lakes. These trucks were absolutely beaten to death driving through tree paths that were only 4' wide, through rivers, into logging areas, you name it. I was at that camp many times and you'd see a certain truck for maybe 3-4 years and then it was gone. The Mercury went that way as well. Even at the time, in my early 20's, I wanted to take that thing home badly just because of the uniqueness of it. I wish I had bothered to see what was under the hood, but at the time it wasn't all that important to me. At least I got to drive one...that's more than most people can say!
I took the crank for a 221 and put it in a 79 / 302 truck block with drop forge pistons 63 260 sprint rods thay are 43)40 steel put grade 12 aircraft bolts in the rods 190 psi.tensel straight thay ballencd it to turn 1400.00rpm and it gives a 454 big block Chevy a run for the money I have even beat a 454 duel tunnel ram
I get the enthusiasm, but honestly, I think the 221 crank swap into a 302 truck block is a bit overhyped for real performance. While it’s impressive to see what you've done with those 260 sprint rods and aircraft bolts, the bottom end of a 302 just isn’t built to hold up against a big-block like a 454, no matter how high you rev it.
@gregoryplummer-l9l Wow, Gregory, that’s an incredible build you’ve got there! Swapping a 221 crank into a 302 truck block with drop-forged pistons and 260 Sprint rods is pure old-school ingenuity. The grade 12 aircraft bolts and balancing it to hit 14,000 RPM is next-level engineering. It’s no surprise it gives a 454 big block Chevy a run for its money-your setup sounds like a serious street-and-strip monster
For fans of American Muscle Cars, this is the kind of passion and innovation that defines our love for these machines. What do you all think of Gregory's build? Got any stories or similar builds to share? Let us know in the comments
Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to explore more incredible American muscle builds. Thanks for sharing, Gregory-wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas....
We had a 67 with the 410 .
That’s a gem right there!
The 410 V8 was part of Ford’s legendary FE engine family, known for its mix of durability and performance. While it wasn’t as famous as the 428 Cobra Jet or the 427, the 410 packed a punch with a 4.05-inch bore and 3.98-inch stroke, producing solid torque and power for its time. Many enthusiasts might not know it was exclusive to Mercury vehicles like the Monterey and the Park Lane.
These engines were built for smooth cruising but could roar when you put your foot down. What do you remember most about it? Let us know
Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine memory? Comment below, share your stories, and don’t forget to explore more on American Muscle Cars. Subscribe to keep the muscle car spirit alive.
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas
My dad put one in his F100 very strong
The F100 paired with a strong engine is a true classic powerhouse-your dad knew how to build a beast! It’s amazing how these old trucks, when equipped with the right engine, still hold their own on the road. What engine did he drop in-maybe a 390 FE or something like a 460 big block? Let us know! These are the stories that keep the American muscle spirit alive. Share more about it in the comments, and remember to subscribe for more muscle car history and builds.
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas to you and your family
Sure, they’re strong, but there are better options if you want raw performance. You’ve got to consider the newer tech, like the 351 Cleveland or even the 429. They offer more power and efficiency, making them a solid choice for anyone looking to get the most out of their ride.
@@AdelynDodson I get where you're coming from, but I still think the older FE series engines hold a special place. The 427 and 428 have that raw, classic muscle car sound and feel that the newer engines just can't match. Sure, modern tech is great for efficiency, but there’s something about the old-school power and soul that gives the FE its legendary status.
272 292 ? Significant for what?
I get that 272 and 292 might seem like random numbers, but they were actually significant for Ford's early V8 engines. The 272, introduced in '55, was a step up from the Flathead V8, and the 292 followed in '57, offering more power. These engines laid the groundwork for the legendary 390 and 427. Without these early small-blocks, we wouldn't have the muscle car era we know and love today
Great question
The 272 and 292 V8 engines were part of Ford's iconic Y-block engine family, known for powering some of the most legendary Fords of the 1950s. These engines were significant for introducing innovations like overhead valves and crossflow cylinder heads, making them pioneers in Ford’s shift toward modern engine designs. The 272 was the workhorse, found in models like the Customline, while the 292 was more performance-oriented, gracing cars like the Thunderbird and Mercury Montclair. Both helped solidify Ford’s reputation for durability and power during a pivotal time in American automotive history.
What’s your favorite Ford V8? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to explore more American muscle content on our channel. Like, share, and subscribe to join our growing community of muscle car enthusiasts.
Wishing you a great day and a very Merry Christmas
Keep cruising and stay passionate about muscle cars
Do one of these on tha 406!
The Ford 406 is a fantastic engine and a true legend of its era. Known as the high-performance powerhouse of the early 1960s, it set the stage for the muscle car wars to come. Built on the FE block, the 406 packed a punch with its high compression and impressive horsepower, dominating drag strips and NASCAR tracks alike. It was a bridge to the 427, making it a key piece of Ford’s performance history.
We’ll definitely consider diving into the 406’s history, engineering, and impact in a future video-stay tuned! In the meantime, let us know what other classic engines or cars you'd love us to explore in the comments below. Don’t forget to share this video, hit that subscribe button, and join us as we celebrate American muscle cars
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Had 410 out ran all chevy police cars alabama such them up tail pipe then blew them out 410 4v wow
I get the excitement for the 410, but I’ve gotta say, it’s not always about raw power. Sure, the 410 had plenty of muscle, but there’s more to the equation-handling, durability, and tech were key too. If you’re just looking at straight-line speed, the 410’s 4V was a beast, but don't forget the balance and refinement that other engines like the SBC could bring to the table.
Wow, what a story
That 410 4V must have been a beast tearing up those Alabama roads! The Ford 410, part of the legendary FE engine family, had serious muscle under the hood with its high-performance build, especially in the late '60s. It’s incredible to hear how it outran Chevy police cars-those tailpipes never saw it coming! This engine was all about torque and raw power, making it a true standout.
Muscle car fans, what’s your favorite engine showdown memory? Share your stories below! And don’t forget to comment, like, and subscribe to the American Muscle Car channel for more epic tales like this.
Wishing you a great day and a Merry Christmas
Some of this actually sounded like a human speaking english...
Hey there, thanks for your comment
We always aim to keep it real and make every episode feel like you're chatting with a fellow muscle car fan. From the roar of a V8 to the history that drives these beauties, American Muscle Cars have a story that deserves to be shared. What’s your favorite muscle car of all time? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe for more deep dives, share this with other enthusiasts, and let's keep the muscle car passion alive.
Thanks for watching and being part of this amazing community.
Have a great day and a Merry Christmas to you and yours
My mom had a Mercury Maruder 390 I used to drive. I smoked the tires a few times.
I get that the Mercury Marauder 390 is a beast, but honestly, it doesn’t get enough love in the muscle car world. Sure, it had power, but compared to some other iconic cars like the '69 Charger or the Mustang, it's a bit overlooked. It's more of a sleeper, but the big-block torque and that long, low stance really gave it a different kind of edge. It's all about preference, though...
So I thought the 410 or 406 was a MEL engine.
Not a FE.
This engine is FE. The MEL was in the late 1950s.
You’re not alone in thinking that
The 410 and 406 might seem like MEL engines at first glance, but they’re part of the legendary Ford FE family, which gave us iconic engines like the 390 and 427. The FE series is all about power and versatility-dominating drag strips, NASCAR, and even Le Mans! It’s this history that keeps muscle car fans hooked. What’s your favorite FE engine story?
Let us know in the comments, share this video with fellow gearheads, and don’t forget to subscribe for more muscle car history
Wishing you a great weekend and a Merry Christmas
@silicon212 You're absolutely right
The Ford FE series engines, including the 410 and 406, were legendary in their time, dominating the early 1960s performance scene. Meanwhile, the MEL series, like the 410 and 430, came earlier, hitting the streets in the late '50s. Both engine families brought incredible power, but they were designed with different goals-FE for versatility and MEL for luxury muscle
What’s your favorite FE or MEL engine story? Share it in the comments
You are Correct the 410 was in the 1958
EDSEL Capri and Citation., it was a MEL engine. but in 1966 Ford Put a 428 crank into a 390 block and installed it into the Merc line this was the FE 410. They are confused with each other, but they are two different engines. The 406 was an FE Ford built for NASCAR racing, it replaced 390 in mid 1961, Then was replaced in 1963 by the 427 low riser.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 Believe it or not a MEL 430 won Top fuel Class in 1959. And the 430 Merc Marauder Engine was the first American Automotive engine to be rated at 400 hp. Beauchamp was second at Daytona in a Holman & Moody prepped 1959 430 Thunderbird. Not all MEL engines were intended to pull Luxury cars around.
You know Ford made a 383ci big block, right? Look up the "MEL" family of engines.
Thanks for bringing that up
Ford’s 383 cubic inch engine comes from the legendary MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, built between 1958 and 1968. This engine family was famous for its innovation, powering some of the most iconic luxury and performance cars of the era. The 383ci was one of the smaller-displacement MEL engines but still packed a punch with its torque-heavy design. While MEL engines weren’t as performance-focused as the FE series, they represent an important chapter in Ford’s engine history.
We’d love to hear what you think about the MEL family and how it compares to other Ford engine lines.
Share your thoughts in the comments
Don’t forget to check out our other videos diving into Ford’s history and subscribe for more deep dives into American Muscle Cars.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas
Stay passionate about muscle cars
Actually, I gotta disagree with you on the MEL family. While it’s a cool part of Ford’s history, the 383ci wasn’t quite as iconic or impactful as the FE or 427ci big blocks. The MEL didn’t have the same performance pedigree, and when it comes to muscle, the FE and Windsor engines truly take the crown.
@@MuscleCarMasters68 My friends Brother had a 1958 Meteor Rideau 2 door hard top that had a MEL 383 engine in it.
A Meteor is Canadian Ford the Canada plant made some goofy things.
@@mylanmiller9656 thank you so much for your comment....1958 Meteor Rideau 2-door hardtop with a MEL 383-that’s a rare gem from Ford’s Canadian lineup! The MEL 383 may not have been as high-revving as the FE series, but its torque-heavy design made it a powerhouse for luxury and performance. Meteors are such a cool part of automotive history, showing how Ford Canada put its own twist on iconic designs. What’s your take on the MEL engines compared to Ford’s FE or Windsor lines? Let us know in the comments below
have a good day.
To bad Ford didn’t make it a performance engine and allow its use in the Mustang, Torino and Fairlane GT’s as an option. The 390 was no match for Chebbies 396, the 410 having 20 extra cubic inches and the 428.s cam, carb and intake would have been very competitive
I see where you're coming from, but honestly, Ford's decision to stick with the 390 made sense for the time. The 410 V8 wasn’t just about raw power-it had a unique balance that worked better in the heavier models like the Galaxie. Plus, the 428 wasn’t far behind, with excellent torque and flexibility. It wasn’t about always beating Chevy, but creating a solid, reliable performer.
You're absolutely right
It’s a shame that Ford didn’t leverage the potential of the 410 V8 to make a splash in their performance lineup. With its unique combination of a 4.05-inch bore and the 428's 3.98-inch stroke, the 410 had serious untapped potential. Imagine if they had paired it with a high-performance cam, a four-barrel carb, and a free-flowing intake-this engine could’ve been a real contender against Chevy’s 396 and given Ford fans another powerhouse option in iconic models like the Mustang, Torino, or Fairlane GT.
The 410 is a great “what-if” in muscle car history, and it’s one reason why Ford enthusiasts love to debate what could have been. What do you think? Would the 410 have changed the muscle car wars? Let us know in the comments
Don't forget to subscribe, like, and share for more American Muscle Car history and insights.
Have a great day and Merry Christmas
I get where you're coming from, but I still think the older FE series engines hold a special place. The 427 and 428 have that raw, classic muscle car sound and feel that the newer engines just can't match. Sure, modern tech is great for efficiency, but there’s something about the old-school power and soul that gives the FE its legendary status.
The 430 produced 365 hp
that power number depended on the year of the engine, and what model it was. if it was a 1958 it had more power than later engine, by 1960 the Lincoln engine could be had with a 2-barrel carb. Ford had problems with the 1958 engines, so they Cut the power back on later engines. The 1958 Merc Marauder engine with 3 x 2 barrel carbs was rated at 400hp.
Yes...the 430 V8 cranked out an impressive 365 horsepower, making it a powerhouse of its time! Known as the “Bulldozer,” this engine was a key player in some iconic vehicles, like the Lincoln Continental and Mercury’s big cruisers in the late ’50s and early ’60s. Its torque was legendary, perfect for those heavy, luxury rides that defined American engineering. Fun fact: this engine was part of the MEL (Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln) family, a powerhouse lineup designed to compete with the best in the muscle and luxury market of the era.
What’s your favorite ride that featured the 430? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into classic engines and muscle cars. Share the love for American automotive history, and stay tuned for more
Wishing you a fantastic day and a very Merry Christmas, muscle car enthusiasts
260 c.i. only in 63 hmmm
Ford’s 410 engine, part of the FE family, was one of their most unique and short-lived powerhouses, making it a true gem for enthusiasts. Released only in 1966 and 1967, the 410 combined the stroke of a 428 with the smaller bore of a 390, delivering impressive low-end torque while keeping that big-block feel. It’s no surprise that it became a favorite for both performance and style during its time.
Got any memorable stories about your '67 with the 410? We'd love to hear them
Wishing you a fantastic day and a Merry Christmas! Keep the muscle car spirit alive
406 COD.
406 COD
What a callout, and you're spot on-it’s part of the fascinating Ford FE engine family, and it paved the way for some iconic big blocks! While the 410 V8 was short-lived, its legacy is undeniable, being a unique blend of performance and durability. Muscle car fans, let’s hear your thoughts-what’s your favorite Ford FE engine?
Drop your comments below, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters
Let’s keep the roar of American muscle alive.
Wishing you an amazing day and a Merry Christmas! Keep cruising, muscle fans
@ SRI, 406 CID.
@@oldjarhead386 yes... of course, I got it...What a sharp eye, and you’re absolutely right-406 CID deserves its moment in the spotlight! As part of Ford's legendary FE engine family, the 406 was a true game-changer in the early 1960s, paving the way for big block performance. Introduced in 1962, this beast boasted a reinforced block and forged pistons, making it a favorite for racers back in the day. It laid the groundwork for the mighty 427 that followed-talk about a legacy of power
have a good holiday...
260
Lizard went 410 tail pipe ate valves out blew up engine uncle Jack drank 20 beers said it ran 141 mph
I get the excitement around the Ford 410 FE, but let’s be real here-just talking about 141 mph and a blown engine doesn’t do the car justice. The 410's true strength lies in its powerband and torque delivery, not just raw speed. Pushing these engines too far without tuning or maintenance can lead to costly failures.
Wow, what a story, Lizard
That 410 must’ve been a beast before it gave up the ghost. Sounds like Uncle Jack was living the full-throttle life-141 mph is no joke! The 410 FE engines were known for their torque and power, but it sounds like she pushed past her limits. Classic muscle cars have a way of creating legendary moments like this! What’s the next move? Rebuild it or find a new engine to keep the legacy alive? Let us know in the comments, everyone! Share your own stories, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more tales of American horsepower.
Have a great day, and Merry Christmas to you and yours
Y block I want to forget it
I get why some may not love the Y-block, but honestly, it deserves more respect. The Y-block had some serious engineering behind it, especially for its time. It might not have the raw power of later engines, but its smooth operation and history in early muscle cars can’t be ignored. It's part of the Ford legacy
Hey there, friend
While the Y-block engine might not have been the most glamorous chapter in muscle car history, it laid the groundwork for the powerhouse engines we know and love today. Its sturdy design and reliability were key stepping stones for Ford's legendary FE and Windsor series. Plus, the Y-block was a workhorse in its day-something we can’t overlook in the evolution of V8 performance!
What do you think about its role in shaping muscle car history? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to explore more American muscle car content on our channel, and remember to like, share, and subscribe to keep the spirit alive.
Have an awesome day, and Merry Christmas