The inability to remain in jurisdiction is something coppers do all the time. This bearded clam went OUTSIDE of his jurisdiction and would leave himself open to any member of the public as they defend themselves against his attacks and his beard being smeared all over the floor quite lawfully. He's a buffoon.
Does this self entitled piece of work determined to stitch up a member of the public think he is enhancing the view the public hold of police. He obviously has resentment towards auditors and is allowing his personal animosity to harass Yardley. He immediately creates in me a feeling of contempt. Is he capable of carrying out any police work impartially and to my benefit? No. He is willing to use force, impose his feelings rather than the law, and abuse his power. This is why the public has no respect for the police. Unlike the other young man who listened carefully and answered impartially and creates a feeling of respect. If only they were all like him
That Sergeant seems deranged and you are right about his eyes, very menacing, a danger to the public. He does that while being filmed, imagine what he does without a camera on him.
Why was he antagonistic but said have a nice day snd have a lovely day? He did not mean it? He is quite disingenuous liar. His disdain for you was palpable. How can we respect such untrustworthy behaviour.
that was an arrogant and unhelpful cop "I thought i was incredibly polite" says the cop...which indicates the low level he usually maintains. the childish need to speak over the member of the public...it makes him and (as a representative) the police, look such a poor and disinterested service, someone who can not be trusted to treat people with respect and decency.
Unfortunately everything gets funneled through the 'Crown', we pay for it all , but technically they work for Charlie and the crown , we're just the mugs who pay for it, it's like us paying for next doors conservatory to be built, but we don't get the positive value of it .
@@ianhill4585you get to look at your neighbours conservatory… and should be grateful for that! 😂😂 your comment is spot on. The police even openly say “we’re not public servants, we’re crown servants”
@@thoughtfulalbatros9683I think it's common mis interpretation because the American police are public servants working for( allegedly) and paid for" by the people."
Respectfully, "Implied Right of Access" means you can go onto private property to do things you reasonably believe you would be entitled to do - like deliver post, or a takeaway. And it can totally be withdrawn if the property owners tell you they’re withdrawing it. "Paid for by the public" doesn't always mean you have "Implied Right of Access". There are restricted areas in publicly funded buildings such as Police stations and Job centers.
top lines of government memo "The well being of OUR police is our priority" shame they dont feel the same about the public they are supposed to serve. They dont serve no public they are the kings servants.
Implied permission applies to private property which is publicly accessible or used by the public, such as shops etc. Implied permission can't apply to government services as it is a human right to be able to access them. Article 14 says that no form of discrimination can be applied, therefore there can't be any picking and choosing by saying permission has been removed. The only thing that can be used to stop or limit someone using a service is a court injunction or other legal route such as bail conditions.
LEGALS 74973 (Sergeant "Benjamin Felton")...Has mental issues - he's known as an aggressive busy-body, focusing on irrelevant, petty matters not real crime eg. organising time talking to children (🤔) about cars & speed (??). ie. useless. The bullied at school type, who hides himself behind his beard. Swift to threaten violence. Chief BJH needs to have him retrained, and he certainly needs some assistance with his current mental state. And the Law ... as a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Maybe it is alcohol or drug use ... hard to tell these days.
Big up Yardley Ski . The implied right of access can not be revoked for filming alone . we the people are allowed to document our interactions with the authorities . we can not demand that the police not to record us ,as it is for their wellbeing and therefore entirely justifiable .its a very simple premise that this equally applies to the public . Our human rights dictate that any online form for public consumption must be available in paper form from those that published it . A covert camera is still going to capture the denial of service . unless the officers resort to strip searching members of the public on entry the cannot prevent recording in the premises .
It's essential to address the behavior of individuals like Sergeant 74973 within law enforcement. When will Parliament pass laws to ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions? It's important for officers to focus on building positive relationships with the community instead of unfairly targeting law-abiding citizens and escalating situations. It's concerning that individuals like Sergeant 74973 may be misusing their authority and taxpayer resources. He should be held responsible and face legal action under section 26. Yardley, thank you for your valuable service. You are truly one of a kind, sir.
I really think,the police service have a major issue with mental illness.I’m sure they must be aware of the issue.the question is,the they have mental illness before they joined or is there something in the job or training that causes mental issues.something really needs to change in how they choose recruits.
This one is a massive danger. "You said you have an appointment" What a bare faced liar. He claims his sneering, harassing patronisation is being incredibly polite. A power crazed wrong un and an absolute nutcase.
His ego got the better of him massively here. After you told him to get lost he lost his cool, came back filming. He was clearly visibly shaken and lacked composure and professionalism. He’s a narcissist.
Totally agree with you Yardley 74973 didn't like you making him call you sir, you should have called him Public Servant not Sgt they hate been called that, great video keep up the good work.
Bloody hell, you found a new dodgy seargent that I haven't met yet. & yes you can walk around ALL of the grounds there I've done it a few times now. I did get arrested once but that was because they tried giving me a covid fine & I wouldn't accept it. Keep up the good work Yardley 👏 💪✌️✌️👍
The reason why the bearded lady Sargent has so much contempt for you and the public is because deep down inside of his sociopathic ego,he knows he's wrong We pay for the roof over his head We pay for him to lie and break the law every day with no accountability We pay for all the mistakes he makes This normalisation of deviance goes right to the top folks
That was a perfect example of an inferiority complex from that Sargent. He kept lowering himself, looked completely out of his depth and is clearly very intellectually short. It's like he doesn't understand how recording works or how he looks on camera and was really struggling.
Yardley Ski Auditing, i have just finished watching your photoplay and am of the opinion that nothing you did was out of order, so you have no reason to admonish or cast aspersions upon yourself re your conduct as an auditor on this occasion. In fact quite the contrary, the discussions you had with the force trainer (and the chief inspector)was brilliant,it actually gave the trainer whose name I just forget, plenty to talk about with his class of new recruits regarding “public places” (per se) trespass, aggravated trespass, general filming from public, rights of the public to redress the police in the course of their duties and probably a few others.😊. The trainer was great actually, just a normal guy who treats people as they would like to be treated and doesn’t make a mountain out of a molehill .
Your a boss the way you handle the Po Po is legit I’ve learnt a lot from your post’s keep doin wat ya doin shining a light on the way these people think they have some kind of power over members of the public respect 👊🏼👊🏼👊🏼keep up the good work fella
There are several places and properties that are private places , privately owned, but at given times are open to the public and at those times are public places. For example a pub, restaurant, council offices etc. Although a public place at the material time , a person’s permission to be there can be withdrawn because it still remains a privately owned place . A pub for instance can eject a customer , or even bar him if that person is no longer wanted on the premises. A police station foyer falls into that category ; obviously open to the public but can be closed to the public at any time. I would say though it is unreasonable to ban a person from the police station foyer without a good reason.For information, all police are Constables regardless of their rank within the police force. This is why there is a ‘chief Constable’. But all police are constables. The internal ranks in practice have very little effect on the public . Some ranks above Sergeant can give extra directions to the public regarding public places streets, demonstrations etc. But by and large the various ranks are for internal order and discipline. A Constable holds an office in his own right. A senior Constable cannot order a junior constable, or another senior constable to behave in any manner that the Constable knows or believes is unlawful or immoral or involves unnecessary use of power. For instance one Constable cannot tell another constable to arrest someone if the Constable knows a different method and prefers to deal with it in another but effective manner. Internal discipline would resolve any disputes.
It is crucial to address the conduct of individuals such as Sergeant 74973 within law enforcement. When will Parliament enact laws to ensure that officers are responsible for their actions? Officers should concentrate on fostering positive connections with the community rather than targeting innocent, law-abiding citizens and escalating situations. It is worrying that individuals like Sergeant 74973 may be abusing their authority and taxpayer resources. He should be held accountable and prosecuted under section 26. Yardley, thank you for your service.
This Sgt had a huge ego with typicel disdain for anyone who challenges him, His people skills leave leave a lot of room for improvement and would surely aggrevate many people.
This highlights the different ways British policing is carried out. The Sargeant was a very poor example of professional policing who let is frustration lead his actions. This is why there is an issue with trust with the police expertly demonstrated.
The foyer of a police station often have information leaflets on a notice board, many of which would never be seen by the public had they not entered the building. Yet in the eyes of the police you can only enter if you have prior business, you cannot enter just while passing to read posters etc. To inform the public then why don't they plaster the notices on the sides of panda cars and vans, as they're often parked outside stations on double yellow lines, pavement etc. In supermarket car parks right outside the entrance and near Greggs and other not so healthy food sale establishments.
Am I only allowed out of my house via an IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS ? Only a Court Order can prohibit someones access or movements in certain public places. I think the Chief Inspector is getting confused with PRIVATE property which is open to the public by INVITATION whereby that invitation can be revoked and PUBLIC property which is open at certain times and where the public have an ABSOLUTE right to be. Of course there may be consequences for misbehaving or generally causing a disturbance in ANY public place but since peaceful photography and videography are not crimes and are NOT PROHIBITED in public places, then photography and videography should NOT be blamed and curtailed if members of staff or members of the public lose their sh1t and THEY cause a disturbance at a police counter. If the police are worried about personal information being recorded, DON'T BLURT OUT PRIVATE INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC LOBBY / FOYER ! Have information written down and slid under the security window or wait until the photographer / videographer goes away (just like waiting for a traffic jam to go away, sometimes we have to just wait) or USE AN INTERVIEW ROOM if it's urgent and can't wait you lazy, incompetent wastrels !
Finally someone has the balls to bring this up about police lobbies in Essex,they have been doing it for 2/3 years now and even ab has been to the worst at Southend and stood outside filming and wouldn’t attempt to go in the lobby
They seem to like their "Implied right of access" jargon. They spout so much rubbish they confuse themselves. One thing is certain, some don't like photographers! That last PC was polite and civil...shows it can be done.
Report that clown for section 26 offence, It is a CRIMINAL matter so they Have to take your report, if they don't, then SUE Essex police as a force for Malfeasence in public office! The payout and repercussions will be far reaching
That SGT was off the wall, so no one can blame you for not being prepared for that behavior. It would be great if someone would take people like that SGT to court for this nonsense. This can be done, but most auditors grab the claim money and leave it there. Sometimes an example must be made, or it will never end. It's public and just being kicked out for filming is public is a rights violation.
correct me if i'm wrong ( not 100 % sure ) but i'm under the impression only an inspector can remove your implied right to be on police premises, not a sergeant.
![BREAKING NEWS: TOMMY ROBINSON SPEAKS FROM PRISON [FULL AUDIO]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/2jWyuONvW1k/mqdefault.jpg)
A classic case of a badly behaved servant who steals his wages along with his oxygen and thinks hes the boss .
NPCs
NPD that seargent has got,hope he's not in contact wi the public a lot,he looks dangerous
I wonder if he's the boss when he goes home to his mate ? 🤔
They never have a sensible answer
Police Sgt is a danger to the public, he is unstable. Power always corrupts.
He's a (C)unstable
Too true, look at Starmer.
why?, hes been acting like a total twat and engineered whatever happens next fuck em
Absolute power corrupts absolutely
He believes that he is our master.
That Sgt is a menace
Thats some absolutely bizarre behaviour from a sgt in today's time when filming is so common 😳 ego on another level
It’s all about the power that he stole from the people.
Crazy Sergeant 74973 couldn't wait to make an arrest . . . he looks like a 'wrong un' and should not be on the force.
Defo a wrongun
The inability to remain in jurisdiction is something coppers do all the time. This bearded clam went OUTSIDE of his jurisdiction and would leave himself open to any member of the public as they defend themselves against his attacks and his beard being smeared all over the floor quite lawfully.
He's a buffoon.
But he’s really scared of people! 🤓🤓
Does this self entitled piece of work determined to stitch up a member of the public think he is enhancing the view the public hold of police. He obviously has resentment towards auditors and is allowing his personal animosity to harass Yardley. He immediately creates in me a feeling of contempt. Is he capable of carrying out any police work impartially and to my benefit? No. He is willing to use force, impose his feelings rather than the law, and abuse his power. This is why the public has no respect for the police. Unlike the other young man who listened carefully and answered impartially and creates a feeling of respect. If only they were all like him
That Sergeant seems deranged and you are right about his eyes, very menacing, a danger to the public. He does that while being filmed, imagine what he does without a camera on him.
It seemed he was really scared of Yardley.
Sergeant just wanted to flex his pathetic power because you would not toady to him.
False powers that were never given to them.
If no laws are being broken, then the police sergeant (or any other police officer come to that) has no powers.
Always brilliant Yardley, they definitely have to earn our respect and usually won't because they are pirates and not the constables they should be.
They are very scared when citizens get to close to them.
Why was he antagonistic but said have a nice day snd have a lovely day? He did not mean it? He is quite disingenuous liar. His disdain for you was palpable. How can we respect such untrustworthy behaviour.
He was scared. They train themselves to be frightened of us.
that was an arrogant and unhelpful cop "I thought i was incredibly polite" says the cop...which indicates the low level he usually maintains. the childish need to speak over the member of the public...it makes him and (as a representative) the police, look such a poor and disinterested service, someone who can not be trusted to treat people with respect and decency.
The implied right is regarding private property, police stations aren't private they're Civic and are paid for by the public.
Unfortunately everything gets funneled through the 'Crown', we pay for it all , but technically they work for Charlie and the crown , we're just the mugs who pay for it, it's like us paying for next doors conservatory to be built, but we don't get the positive value of it .
@@ianhill4585you get to look at your neighbours conservatory… and should be grateful for that! 😂😂
your comment is spot on. The police even openly say “we’re not public servants, we’re crown servants”
@@thoughtfulalbatros9683I think it's common mis interpretation because the American police are public servants working for( allegedly) and paid for" by the people."
@@ianhill4585 And the King/Crown takes an oath to uphold the laws and customs.
Respectfully, "Implied Right of Access" means you can go onto private property to do things you reasonably believe you would be entitled to do - like deliver post, or a takeaway. And it can totally be withdrawn if the property owners tell you they’re withdrawing it.
"Paid for by the public" doesn't always mean you have "Implied Right of Access". There are restricted areas in publicly funded buildings such as Police stations and Job centers.
Yardley posted, SGT already being a fool ,and we are here for it!!
Wow...😜!
Hello Cupcake...!!! 🤩!
❤️ Ez. 😘 X
Wales.
top lines of government memo "The well being of OUR police is our priority" shame they dont feel the same about the public they are supposed to serve. They dont serve no public they are the kings servants.
They are very afraid of us. We are their “ Boogie Man”.
I’m always amazed how they have this pre conceived knowledge of your requirements
I wonder what sergeant 74973 wants to be when he grows up?
"Flexing muscles you haven't got " Thats it, in a nutshell.
Flexing his moobs! What's his bra size? B cup?
What an absolute 🔔 end and this weasel is a Sgt?
A very frightened Sargent. It seems his career is based on fear and being afraid of the people.
Essex Police....Nearly as bad as the MET
Implied permission applies to private property which is publicly accessible or used by the public, such as shops etc. Implied permission can't apply to government services as it is a human right to be able to access them. Article 14 says that no form of discrimination can be applied, therefore there can't be any picking and choosing by saying permission has been removed. The only thing that can be used to stop or limit someone using a service is a court injunction or other legal route such as bail conditions.
The public servant has lost it. It’s getting frustrating that my wages pay for this drizzle. His poor wife! Look at the state of him
Brilliant as always YS - you treat these enemies of decency like we all should, thank you.
after 10 years of youtube they still dont realise if they did not react there would be no videos ! now that takes a certain kind of stupid
Yes, but you can't teach stupid 😂😂😂
LEGALS
74973 (Sergeant "Benjamin Felton")...Has mental issues - he's known as an aggressive busy-body, focusing on irrelevant, petty matters not real crime eg. organising time talking to children (🤔) about cars & speed (??). ie. useless. The bullied at school type, who hides himself behind his beard. Swift to threaten violence.
Chief BJH needs to have him retrained, and he certainly needs some assistance with his current mental state. And the Law ... as a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Maybe it is alcohol or drug use ... hard to tell these days.
He definitely is not trustworthy, shows zero integrity in his passive aggressive smarmy manner.
A wrong'un , no doubt about that
Seems he's found his level talking to kids - his intellectual equals.
@@Smeeagain75 Unstable imhlo
That Sgt with the looney look in his eyes. Absolute plank!
So that's how the sergeant treats the public, what an ego, what a waste of space.
Sergeant was a complete 🔔 end and power crazy!! FOIA his employment and disciplinary record!!
Big up Yardley Ski . The implied right of access can not be revoked for filming alone . we the people are allowed to document our interactions with the authorities . we can not demand that the police not to record us ,as it is for their wellbeing and therefore entirely justifiable .its a very simple premise that this equally applies to the public . Our human rights dictate that any online form for public consumption must be available in paper form from those that published it . A covert camera is still going to capture the denial of service . unless the officers resort to strip searching members of the public on entry the cannot prevent recording in the premises .
Ah the "uncomfortable law" , the solution is to buy larger underwear, ---end of discomfort.........😁
I remember this station always reacted bad to auditors. Its been done multiple times and they always bite and misbehave. Bunch of rogues
What a bad attitude from that copper
The officer in civvies is how Police officers should be .What a genuine guy he came across has .
Seriously? He brought up arresting people, when that wasn’t even the topic.
They are hand picked as narcissists
the police own a station paid for by the public ? when did they give us our money back ?
The Crown owns it, ---we're just the mugs who pay for it, and pay for the cops who work AGAINST us most of the time.
So weird that this cop thought he was polite, when he’s being a passive aggressive prick
It’s a delusion that many of them have.
It's essential to address the behavior of individuals like Sergeant 74973 within law enforcement. When will Parliament pass laws to ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions? It's important for officers to focus on building positive relationships with the community instead of unfairly targeting law-abiding citizens and escalating situations. It's concerning that individuals like Sergeant 74973 may be misusing their authority and taxpayer resources. He should be held responsible and face legal action under section 26. Yardley, thank you for your valuable service. You are truly one of a kind, sir.
I can see why my council tax is so high, if we the public have to pay for the extravagant big buildings just for the police to waler about in 😡😡😡😡
Have you seen their country training centres? The upkeep on the buildings and grounds must cost us tens of thousands every year.
They like to operate in the darkness
I really think,the police service have a major issue with mental illness.I’m sure they must be aware of the issue.the question is,the they have mental illness before they joined or is there something in the job or training that causes mental issues.something really needs to change in how they choose recruits.
and EGO And Self Importance in a Uniform 🤡🤡🤡🥷🎥📹🎬
⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️
Probably MK ultra stuff
Some of these people are very juvenile in their behaviour.
Please don't put yourself down for things you may have done better. You are a legend standing up for all our rights
this creature is really sick!
This one is a massive danger. "You said you have an appointment" What a bare faced liar. He claims his sneering, harassing patronisation is being incredibly polite. A power crazed wrong un and an absolute nutcase.
Could they be any more embarrassing?
They feel no shame or embarrassment. They can’t see their own cowardice.
Sgt 74973 is definitely a wrong'un. Immature, and a bit of a psycho look in his eye. One wonders what he gets up to when not being filmed.
Bunch of sausage melts
If carslberg made the best auditor in the UK it would be Yardley ski 😅
yes hes up there with ab must agrre
I remember those ads they were funny
Well done PC Hersh, credit where credit is due 👍
🤮🤮🤮🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️👮🏼♂️
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Yardley at his best as usual, let’s share his channel nationwide and get his subscribers up. Keep up the good work YS 👍
*We Pay For This Lot* clearly having Severe Confusion with Confidence because they all back each others mistakes. *We Pay For This Lot*
They are very afraid of our freedoms.
The eyes chico...they never lie. Absolute psychopath.
Agree, 100%!
His ego got the better of him massively here. After you told him to get lost he lost his cool, came back filming. He was clearly visibly shaken and lacked composure and professionalism. He’s a narcissist.
That copper was sound as a pound, a real copper. Unlike Sergeant Small Ball….
DISAGREE THST 3 PIP WAS A TOSSER
The childish sergeant with a big ego. What an asset to the force, not….i feel so sorry for his wife, I bet he always wants the last word.
Totally agree with you Yardley 74973 didn't like you making him call you sir, you should have called him Public Servant not Sgt they hate been called that, great video keep up the good work.
He actually meant i 'would' like to place his hands' on you given the chance! But you played your hand 'skilfully' Yardley! Respect!!
Inspector needs the sack
Bloody hell, you found a new dodgy seargent that I haven't met yet. & yes you can walk around ALL of the grounds there I've done it a few times now. I did get arrested once but that was because they tried giving me a covid fine & I wouldn't accept it. Keep up the good work Yardley 👏 💪✌️✌️👍
Or illegal behavior, like disorderly conduct.
The reason why the bearded lady Sargent has so much contempt for you and the public is because deep down inside of his sociopathic ego,he knows he's wrong
We pay for the roof over his head
We pay for him to lie and break the law every day with no accountability
We pay for all the mistakes he makes
This normalisation of deviance goes right to the top folks
That was a perfect example of an inferiority complex from that Sargent. He kept lowering himself, looked completely out of his depth and is clearly very intellectually short. It's like he doesn't understand how recording works or how he looks on camera and was really struggling.
Sgt 74073 better go an arrest AB since he went into the reception and filmed there.
👍🤣🤣
Yardley Ski Auditing, i have just finished watching your photoplay and am of the opinion that nothing you did was out of order, so you have no reason to admonish or cast aspersions upon yourself re your conduct as an auditor on this occasion.
In fact quite the contrary, the discussions you had with the force trainer (and the chief inspector)was brilliant,it actually gave the trainer whose name I just forget, plenty to talk about with his class of new recruits regarding “public places” (per se) trespass, aggravated trespass, general filming from public, rights of the public to redress the police in the course of their duties and probably a few others.😊.
The trainer was great actually, just a normal guy who treats people as they would like to be treated and doesn’t make a mountain out of a molehill .
Copsplain is the name of the game
Your a boss the way you handle the Po Po is legit I’ve learnt a lot from your post’s keep doin wat ya doin shining a light on the way these people think they have some kind of power over members of the public respect 👊🏼👊🏼👊🏼keep up the good work fella
There are several places and properties that are private places , privately owned, but at given times are open to the public and at those times are public places. For example a pub, restaurant, council offices etc. Although a public place at the material time , a person’s permission to be there can be withdrawn because it still remains a privately owned place . A pub for instance can eject a customer , or even bar him if that person is no longer wanted on the premises. A police station foyer falls into that category ; obviously open to the public but can be closed to the public at any time. I would say though it is unreasonable to ban a person from the police station foyer without a good reason.For information, all police are Constables regardless of their rank within the police force. This is why there is a ‘chief Constable’. But all police are constables. The internal ranks in practice have very little effect on the public . Some ranks above Sergeant can give extra directions to the public regarding public places streets, demonstrations etc. But by and large the various ranks are for internal order and discipline. A Constable holds an office in his own right. A senior Constable cannot order a junior constable, or another senior constable to behave in any manner that the Constable knows or believes is unlawful or immoral or involves unnecessary use of power. For instance one Constable cannot tell another constable to arrest someone if the Constable knows a different method and prefers to deal with it in another but effective manner. Internal discipline would resolve any disputes.
It is crucial to address the conduct of individuals such as Sergeant 74973 within law enforcement. When will Parliament enact laws to ensure that officers are responsible for their actions? Officers should concentrate on fostering positive connections with the community rather than targeting innocent, law-abiding citizens and escalating situations. It is worrying that individuals like Sergeant 74973 may be abusing their authority and taxpayer resources. He should be held accountable and prosecuted under section 26. Yardley, thank you for your service.
From the very start this person was spoiling for a 'fight'----a very dangerous individual who should be nowhere near the public!
This Sgt had a huge ego with typicel disdain for anyone who challenges him, His people skills leave leave a lot of room for improvement and would surely aggrevate many people.
This highlights the different ways British policing is carried out. The Sargeant was a very poor example of professional policing who let is frustration lead his actions. This is why there is an issue with trust with the police expertly demonstrated.
They’re mentally obliged to stop you and bellow orders because they need to fill their daily ego quota. Perfectly normal!😳🙄
I will never forget when A.B. went there.Hilarious.
Saw that :)
On the news now at 25th Sept 2024 on GB News, the Met have officially Banned 'the thin blue line' badge from uniforms...!
Good work that man....!
Don’t beat yourself up, you did far far better in standing up for our rights than the vast majority of us would have been able to do.
Nearly 30K! Great progress! & the necessity to upload content of this type 'couldnt be greater'!!😊
What a grub. He's up for a promotion.
Why can't they communicate in a Normal civilized manner ? The Robotic , monotone, Patronising, Ignorant , confrontational way they talk is Disgusting.
Makes you wonder how some people live with themself.. they do..feeding on other...Disgusting..
The foyer of a police station often have information leaflets on a notice board, many of which would never be seen by the public had they not entered the building. Yet in the eyes of the police you can only enter if you have prior business, you cannot enter just while passing to read posters etc.
To inform the public then why don't they plaster the notices on the sides of panda cars and vans, as they're often parked outside stations on double yellow lines, pavement etc. In supermarket car parks right outside the entrance and near Greggs and other not so healthy food sale establishments.
They use the Terrorism excuse but they display a ground plan outside the building so funny
Instant suspension needed,relieved from duty and made to to resign,awful git
Disobeying their training, the law and the chief inspector is gotta get them in hot water sooner than later!
Am I only allowed out of my house via an IMPLIED RIGHT OF ACCESS ? Only a Court Order can prohibit someones access or movements in certain public places.
I think the Chief Inspector is getting confused with PRIVATE property which is open to the public by INVITATION whereby that invitation can be revoked and PUBLIC property which is open at certain times and where the public have an ABSOLUTE right to be. Of course there may be consequences for misbehaving or generally causing a disturbance in ANY public place but since peaceful photography and videography are not crimes and are NOT PROHIBITED in public places, then photography and videography should NOT be blamed and curtailed if members of staff or members of the public lose their sh1t and THEY cause a disturbance at a police counter.
If the police are worried about personal information being recorded, DON'T BLURT OUT PRIVATE INFORMATION IN THE PUBLIC LOBBY / FOYER ! Have information written down and slid under the security window or wait until the photographer / videographer goes away (just like waiting for a traffic jam to go away, sometimes we have to just wait) or USE AN INTERVIEW ROOM if it's urgent and can't wait you lazy, incompetent wastrels !
Finally someone has the balls to bring this up about police lobbies in Essex,they have been doing it for 2/3 years now and even ab has been to the worst at Southend and stood outside filming and wouldn’t attempt to go in the lobby
They seem to like their "Implied right of access" jargon. They spout so much rubbish they confuse themselves. One thing is certain, some don't like photographers! That last PC was polite and civil...shows it can be done.
Report that clown for section 26 offence, It is a CRIMINAL matter so they Have to take your report, if they don't, then SUE Essex police as a force for Malfeasence in public office! The payout and repercussions will be far reaching
Great Audit Yardley. Keep us updated if you get to email 3 pips.
Didn't AB have fun with that 'uniform guy' in the bonus footage?
Much easier to deal with someone and a camera than a crime or criminals.
That SGT was off the wall, so no one can blame you for not being prepared for that behavior. It would be great if someone would take people like that SGT to court for this nonsense. This can be done, but most auditors grab the claim money and leave it there. Sometimes an example must be made, or it will never end. It's public and just being kicked out for filming is public is a rights violation.
Fantastic work Sarge! Just another waste of time trying to prove he is right because he read a book on law once.
I CANT SPEAK 🔥🔥😡😡😡😡😡🤡💩🏠 the PUREST TYRANT IVE SEEN 💯% mate, well done yardly 👏👏👏
Public pay for that police premises. This srg needs to know we rule then, and we the public own the government and police
correct me if i'm wrong ( not 100 % sure ) but i'm under the impression only an inspector can remove your implied right to be on police premises, not a sergeant.
He needs sacking
I think the problem is, if they can't cope with a guy with a camera, what will they be like in a real situation?
Good video, thanks. Very interesting
YARDLEY UR THE BEST, I HAVE BEEN COVERING YOUR BACK FOR YEARS, KEEP ER LIT
Cheers 🍻 👏 and thanks
Bad cop
Sgt is a complete 🔔 🔚. What a stark contrast from the chief inspector
Don’t move . Protect yourself at all times. It’s your property as well .
he said he owns the building LIKE F-CK HE DOES WE OWN IT AS WE PAY FOR IT
Agree - he owns nothing as a 🐖, WE even own the uniform covering his pathetic body !