Darth Dawkins Atheist Helpline 📞

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • Debate Darth at: discord.gg/politics
    e-mail : SLStreams@yahoo.com
    Donate Bitcoin: bc1qv37w0qvu424nl8nxkcdjv32h6ef66up84d5wwd
    #DarthDawkins

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @Ant-man-01
    @Ant-man-01 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Anyone know Darth's justification for his assertions at 1:16:15 are? He declared the cop who was charged with murder was "just doing his job" and "acting in good faith."
    How does Darth know this?

    • @RobertCoxxxx777
      @RobertCoxxxx777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He doesn't know that.

    • @RobertCoxxxx777
      @RobertCoxxxx777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Darth just associates Republican views with Christianity (fallaciously) so he thinks that siding with whatever Republican views are for any topic is the right thing to do.
      Just wait until he learns the truth - that both sides belong to the same bird and its all controlled by the enemy.

    • @RobertCoxxxx777
      @RobertCoxxxx777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He just thinks that siding with the Republican talking points is right always because he fallaciously associates Christianity with being Republican / right wing.
      He has no idea that both wings belong to the same bird and he's just feeding into the Hegelian Dialectic the enemy uses to deceive. Darth is a prime example of someone who argues for Christianity while having absolutely no idea what Christianity is actually about. He actually aligns more with satanic views than Christian views, but doesn't even realize this.

    • @andreaskarlsson5251
      @andreaskarlsson5251 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He lied. :p

    • @lightbeforethetunnel
      @lightbeforethetunnel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Darth, outside of Presup, suddenly stop requiring justification for his beliefs. He does the same thing with Heliocentrism.
      He just operates on beliefs the world taught him outside of arguing for Presup, demonstrating he doesn't really believe the Epistemology he argues for.

  • @Tonylarkins39
    @Tonylarkins39 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    2:02:00 Parakeet says "all topics of discussion are derived foundationally from your worldview."
    This is true. But, as these guys themselves demonstrate, people aren't always rational within their worldview. These guys believe the Heliocentric model of Cosmology despite the fact there's no rational justification for it within the Christian worldview at all (or any system).
    So, does that mean these guys don't actually believe the Christian worldview? Since they appeal to a different ultimate for Cosmology?

    • @RobertCoxxxx777
      @RobertCoxxxx777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Careful. They're super sensitive on that topic to the point they'll block or never speak to you again for daring to question their Cosmological theory.
      Followed by accusing YOU of caring too much about that topic.

    • @RobertCoxxxx777
      @RobertCoxxxx777 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Projection is fun isn't jt

    • @lightbeforethetunnel
      @lightbeforethetunnel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@RobertCoxxxx777 Yeah the way they project like that is a major red flag to Christians. People only project about things they're not consciously thinking through. So these guys have not seriously researched the ongoing Cosmology debate. Usually, this means they may have glanced briefly at a few top result videos (which are all controlled op strawman videos purposefully designed to make FE look bad) and they therefore think "but I HAVE researched it."
      No, no... you haven't.

  • @donnamurphy8551
    @donnamurphy8551 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s hilarious that DD doesn’t recognize that Anthony Magnabosco is just doing a much better version of what DD thinks he’s doing with atheists.😂

    • @lightbeforethetunnel
      @lightbeforethetunnel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No resemblance whatsoever. I asked that guy, Anthony Magnabosco how his particular non-theistic worldview justifies the pre-conditions for knowledge. He had no idea.

  • @peterwyetzner5276
    @peterwyetzner5276 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do I know about an atheist by hearing him described by someone else as "foaming at the mouth" that I didn't know before? Do I know that what he thinks is less compelling?

  • @harrypothead42024
    @harrypothead42024 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    11:24 It's easy to win an argument when we can only hear your side😂😂😂

  • @peterwyetzner5276
    @peterwyetzner5276 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does it make any less sense to refer to this necessary precondition as "she"? If so, then why?

    • @adriansoto239
      @adriansoto239 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      She is not appropriate.

  • @timothymorrisii7165
    @timothymorrisii7165 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow...