Simone Weil: An Astonishing Life (P1) - by Brad Jersak

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 มิ.ย. 2021

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @robertgray9599
    @robertgray9599 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I liked the part about resisting grace until you can't resist any more. It's so feminine and powerful!

  • @ianboyd6227
    @ianboyd6227 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    A new ObjectiveBob drop? Let’s goooo!

    • @ObjectiveBob
      @ObjectiveBob  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I know I don't post often anymore. Thanks for sticking around. Two more Simone Weil lectures coming this week!

    • @djketler
      @djketler 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@ObjectiveBob Always awaiting new videos - grateful for this! And about Simone Weil? So good...

    • @TheSoteriologist
      @TheSoteriologist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ObjectiveBob More DBH !

  • @bikrommahmud3476
    @bikrommahmud3476 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for uploading!

  • @DonalLeader
    @DonalLeader 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fantastic!

  • @racheladkins6060
    @racheladkins6060 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Someone needs to make a film about all of Simones life?

  • @racheladkins6060
    @racheladkins6060 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As an Autistic person she’s someone I am interested in. I really don’t care what some evangelicals think of Autism, some think it’s demon possession but that’s the carnal mind of eating from the tree of good and evil, the tree of religion and one of death.

  • @smileyface5908
    @smileyface5908 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video.
    I recognise your profile pic. Looks like the porcupine tree album cover isn’t it, great tunes! ❤️❤️

  • @Tobazhniazhi
    @Tobazhniazhi ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In her essay "The Love of God & Affliction", she expresses, most cogently, what the love of God signifies and the significance of the Cross of Jesus: "God created through love and for love. God did not create anything except love itself, and the means to love. He created love in all its forms. He created beings capable of love from all possible distances. Because no other could do it, He Himself went to the greatest possible distance, the infinite distance. This infinite distance between God and God, this supreme tearing apart, this agony beyond all others, this marvel of love, is the Crucifixion. Nothing can be further from God than that which has been made accursed." She continues "This tearing apart, over which supreme love places the bond of supreme union, echoes perpetually across the universe in the midst of the silence, like two notes, separate yet melting into one, like pure and heart-rending harmony. This is the Word of God. The whole creation is nothing but its vibration. When human music in its greatest purity pierces our soul, this is what we hear through it. When we have learned to hear the silence, this is what we grasp more distinctly through it." Simone Weil is one of the most luminous intelligence of the 20th century. She had her feet rooted on the earth with noble social causes and yet with a faith and love soaring beyond time and into eternity. Thank you for sharing the life of this brilliant soul. Her writings, at times difficult to understand yet glowing with an inner core of meaning, has helped me both intellectually and spiritually.

  • @richardbowker1338
    @richardbowker1338 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am no expert but know a fair bit. I've never come across the incident in Marseille and I would really like a reference.

  • @barrytebb7947
    @barrytebb7947 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Diogenes Allen remains the best commentator on her without doubt

  • @lisalasoya2898
    @lisalasoya2898 ปีที่แล้ว

    In one of the blogs dubbed Ms. Weil akin to a Quaker, but it is general Christian beliefs, focusing on attention and the word apathy came about. Almost like love thy neighbor could it be an entrapment?

  • @claudelebel49
    @claudelebel49 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lucid attention or choiceless awareness.

  • @ximono
    @ximono 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Her philosophy (and life) has a lot in common with quaker belief.

    • @Kapojos
      @Kapojos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are they not walking around naked?

    • @ximono
      @ximono 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kapojos No, that would be nudists.

    • @Kapojos
      @Kapojos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ximono what exactly do they stand for/believe in?

    • @ximono
      @ximono 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kapojos Nudists? Being nude. Quakers? Hard to sum up in a TH-cam comment. They name these core "testimonies": simplicity, peace, integrity, community, equality (and sometimes: stewardship). They're Christian, believing in "the inner light" in all of us, and that by waiting in silence one can come into the presence of God. They're also known to be activist, out in the world living according to what they believe. They're a very interesting bunch, especially the silent/waiting kind.

  • @lisalasoya2898
    @lisalasoya2898 ปีที่แล้ว

    The imagination is essentially a lie; the result, this young lady volunteered to gingerly walk in to an outpost. In between, the outsiders were developing camera effects to film these atrocities.

  • @ristomikkonen5255
    @ristomikkonen5255 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Isn't delving into other people's encounters with Christ idolatry of sorts? I know Christians who hold Paul's description of his personal encounter with Jesus in a much higher esteem than the gospel Paul preached. They literally use the diction of that description in order to thwart the universal scope of the gospel.

  • @OUTBOUND184
    @OUTBOUND184 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think inspiring Vatican II should be something cited as an achievement....

  • @racheladkins6060
    @racheladkins6060 ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m Autistic and Christian. Unfortunately American Christian’s find everything they don’t understand as “controversial”.

  • @TheSoteriologist
    @TheSoteriologist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    13:05 - 13:45 I could have told her that beforehand and probably so could those who shook their heads over that around her. Maybe she wasn't so brilliant after all then.

    • @jasonegeland1446
      @jasonegeland1446 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Or maybe she was.

    • @TheSoteriologist
      @TheSoteriologist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@jasonegeland1446 I do not doubt that she was brilliant in many more or less dissociative ways. But this is one indication that in some ways, especially concerning compassionate realism, she was extremely stupid. Notice she didn't compassionately consider the real life of those workers before she did this. She just simply forged her totally unrealistic ideas onto their reality in the typical ässjaydubblyoo manner, on the pretext of saving them.
      Another indication would be that she may have mothered a child and gave it away, just for the sake of seeing how it is to have sex, as the speaker suspects. That would be worse than stupid, it would be heartless and irresponsible even. Or that number with dropping nurses into the frontlines ...

    • @jasonegeland1446
      @jasonegeland1446 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheSoteriologist I suppose if what you're saying is true about her then I might be inclined to agree in certain ways. I'll have to read more on her soon.

    • @TheSoteriologist
      @TheSoteriologist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jasonegeland1446 I only mentioned some points the speaker relates in this very talk.

    • @jasonegeland1446
      @jasonegeland1446 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TheSoteriologist Right on.