Friedman on the “Two Chinas” and How Putin Saves Face

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @MauldinEconomicsYouTube
    @MauldinEconomicsYouTube  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Sign up for my free newsletter here - www.mauldineconomics.com/go/JM528V/YTB

    • @LuisRobinson-v3k
      @LuisRobinson-v3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      HEY OLDMAN STANDING IN FRONT OF A LIBRARY BACKDROP TALKING SH-..T ABOUT RUSSIAN LOSING THE WAR IN UKRAINE!!!... YOU'RE FULL OF KAKA!!!...TIME TO RETIRE YOU'RE OLD SCHOOL...EVEN YOUR CRAP ABOUT CHINA IS OFF!!!..

    • @LuisRobinson-v3k
      @LuisRobinson-v3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Man oh man...WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO PLEASE WITH THIS GARBAGE!!???...WHAT JAPAN DID TO THE U.S. AT THA START OF WW2,CHINA CAN DO BETTER...YOUR RING OF BLOCKADE WILL BE OBLITERATED WITHIN 10HRS,AND THEN OR BY THEN TAIWAN WILL SUE FOR PEACE!!!...END OF STORY!!!

    • @LuisRobinson-v3k
      @LuisRobinson-v3k 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      THINK YOUR MISSILE DEFENCESS CAN STOP ALL ONE HUNDRED HYPERSONIC NUCLEAR TIPPED MISSILES???!!!

    • @TommyAlpha-gg3ig
      @TommyAlpha-gg3ig 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rubbish and propaganda what's wrong with USA inferiority complex ?

    • @charlesmosteller849
      @charlesmosteller849 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Done.

  • @TomSimba
    @TomSimba 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    They hired the wrong guy to lie to the world. He's just not convincing.

  • @davidreed8055
    @davidreed8055 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    China had 50 percent of worlds High Speed Trains, US has none, why?

    • @psychohist
      @psychohist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Americans can all afford to fly.

    • @ZgO_o
      @ZgO_o 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@psychohist i over 60% Americans dont have 300$ in saving for emergency, choosing between meals, medicine and roof over head, over 12% of population homeless, families surviving on creditcards and delequencies on akk time high... naah bruh, U.S living on borrowed time, you know you havw problems when the city if San francisco is full human feces and only cleaned when Chinese president came to visit and believe niether Russia is losing and nor China is collapsing cuz you dont need tarrif, sanctions and trade barriers on a collapsing country to keep your industries alive in your own country

  • @eggtan4051
    @eggtan4051 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Mr.Friedman,is living in another World,US is a Sinking Titanic,yet many are still dancing & singing..

    • @timdarville4827
      @timdarville4827 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you've drunk the kool-aid mate.
      The one that makes a person very prone to confirmation bias.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So the US is worse off now then the 60s, 30s, Civil War? Maybe you don't understand the US. Our internal disagreements have always been public for everyone to see.

    • @SenorJuan2023
      @SenorJuan2023 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      USA in far better shape than Russia, Europe, and China.

    • @AR-tl5cd
      @AR-tl5cd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nice argument, Little Pink. Get out while you still can.

    • @paulwally9007
      @paulwally9007 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@AR-tl5cd The entire comments section is infested with them. Their presence here speaks volumes.

  • @JohnJones-k9d
    @JohnJones-k9d 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    What embarrassing is NATO losing to Russia.

  • @Egalitare
    @Egalitare 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    So much to react to, but I’m new to the channel and I don’t have a feel for the culture yet. Dipping my toe in the water, I don’t think most Westerners (not just North Americans) and probably the majority of “beat reporters” have digested the logistics of tens of thousands of soldiers and their arms, equipment, etc crossing the Taiwan Straits. It’s not just the many hours it would take to make such a crossing. It’s also the finite number of staging areas for such an operation to depart from😳

    • @MauldinEconomicsYouTube
      @MauldinEconomicsYouTube  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Welcome to the channel! Thanks for taking the time to give a thoughtful post. -Ed

    • @davidleker9482
      @davidleker9482 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      and to land safely

    • @mikaelpetersen3331
      @mikaelpetersen3331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      and to - across the strait - continuously resupply weapons, ammunition, heavy equipment, food etc, week after week, month after month, to the troops that actually manage to land on the island until they fight through and overcome one heavily fortified mountain defense after another all along the west coast.
      And all the while keeping these water-based supply lines secure from anti ship missiles, submarines, etc. It is a monumental logistical nightmare in time of war.

  • @tuyolento3295
    @tuyolento3295 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +89

    When i attend a lecture by George Friedman on geopolitics i always hear sniggles in the background and see people rolling their eyes abd shaking their heads...i often winder why?

    • @sanjazuljevic8046
      @sanjazuljevic8046 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      😂

    • @jrpark05
      @jrpark05 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      No you don't, LOL.

    • @hardto994
      @hardto994 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      What he said about China is correct. Stagflation is official and it took the Japanese 25 years to pull out of that.

    • @holliday.
      @holliday. 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      China's CCP has lost the mandate of heaven

    • @amalchakrabarti2357
      @amalchakrabarti2357 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@holliday. America withdraw it self from Afghanistan just after receiving 2000 casualties in 20 years. Ccp is not answerable to its people . Democratic countries are answerable

  • @loofatar5620
    @loofatar5620 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

    Good to see so many comments telling the gentleman strategist that he has lost the plot.

    • @pedtrog6443
      @pedtrog6443 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Getting under peoples skin so he must be saying something right.

    • @jerrymann646
      @jerrymann646 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Stanford is done. George Friedman is laughable.

    • @jerrymann646
      @jerrymann646 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      STATFOR

    • @michaeltrillium
      @michaeltrillium 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Everyone calling Friedman deluded is focused on the Ukraine “stalemate” even though he spent more time on China and Middle East - so it’s hard to believe they’re anything other than Russian propaganda. Also: it IS a stalemate even while Ukraine has barely started hitting inside incompetent Russia, who needed a decade to win in Patriot-less Chechnya. The only way out for Russia is realizing this was a horribly stupid idea and join the philosophy that build the West. Maybe even help remind the West what that is, since the West seems to be trying hard to forget it.

    • @gyurmethlodroe1774
      @gyurmethlodroe1774 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes for 50 cent wumao ​@@jerrymann646

  • @johnsamu
    @johnsamu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    "American debt will be taken care of". He also still believes Santa Claus is a real person?😉

    • @Babalouie59
      @Babalouie59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      When you owe someone, and they go out of business, your debt can be cleared.

    • @dimitrye5148
      @dimitrye5148 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      War make magic happen

    • @washuneluvhada7616
      @washuneluvhada7616 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂😂 Trillons

    • @jakebarnes28
      @jakebarnes28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When you owe the bank a million dollars, the bank owns you. When you owe the bank a billion dollars, you own the bank. What's China going to do? Sell off their Treasury notes? They'll be worth pennies on the dollar, bankrupting them. Their political system is brittle.

    • @richdobbs6595
      @richdobbs6595 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The traditional way to counter balance unpaid foreign debt is gun boat diplomacy, where you take over the ports of a debtor nation, and collect the import duties and pay them to the bankers. Given the relative vulnerability of gun boats to missiles and drones, combined with that the debt is in fiat currency makes this no longer an option. Fiat currency debts can always be hyperinflated away into nothingness, and likely will be. The fundamental debt faced by countries is support for their aged. This will be paid for by some combination of bankrupcy (IE, letting old folks die due to lack of medical care and food), and confiscation (taking of assets of the well off). Given that America has comparatively more assets of the well off, the American debt will be paid for more easily than the Chinese. There is even the possibility (albeit is slight) that rather than directly confiscating assets in America they could pay off this debt by removing privileges of the well of - such as zoning laws, education subsidies, job licensing provision, etc.

  • @johndewey6358
    @johndewey6358 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very good discussion, I wish it was longer and went deeper focusing more on Economics and potential military outcomes (short-term and longer-term)...

  • @davidsaluk9726
    @davidsaluk9726 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    This man on another planet.

    • @AR-tl5cd
      @AR-tl5cd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, thankfully he’s not on your Ruski Mir planet!

    • @roxylius7550
      @roxylius7550 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AR-tl5cddude is tripping high

    • @grahamt5924
      @grahamt5924 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China has a massive problem. Their one child policy and dropping fertility rate is going to cause significant internal problems with more people elderly than young.
      I think they will become a very insignificant country on the world stage in decades to come, as their internal problems overwhelm them.

    • @washuneluvhada7616
      @washuneluvhada7616 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Definitely, even the neocons have a better grasp on realit😢

    • @jakebarnes28
      @jakebarnes28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Troll better Igor

  • @robertatkins9419
    @robertatkins9419 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +127

    For me the most important take away from this, in respect of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, is that the entire discussion was based on a lie - that the conflict is at a stalemate. It isn't at a stalemate, and Friedman knows this perfectly well.

    • @rajlowkie6616
      @rajlowkie6616 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is so obvious from Putin's STREAMS & CRY about the collapse of the USSR & now Russia on HIS⌚watch.

    • @kentjensen4504
      @kentjensen4504 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

      Those people always lie.

    • @pikachus5m166
      @pikachus5m166 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just reverse the scenario given by the msm. Ukraine and its backers are getting more than they ever bargained for.

    • @koffim.kouakou1745
      @koffim.kouakou1745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Totally agree. Me. Friefman and his host are reinforcing a lie. Ukrainians are being decimated and slaughtered.
      What stalemate are they talking about!?
      Russia has no intention of fully invading Ukraine. Her baseline was stopping the war crininals in the Dombass.
      Me. Friedman is again wrong on China!! My goodness!! How do we guess such terrible analysis of world events!?

    • @TommyBeaux
      @TommyBeaux 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly! Ukraine has been destroyed, and with it Europe, NATO and U.S. hegemony.

  • @KCHua
    @KCHua 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Calling him an analyst ? You are just too kind ! 😮

  • @vancityr6485
    @vancityr6485 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    The amount of people screaming "propaganda", while probably watching their state TV in the other room, really makes you think how screwed the world really is..

    • @forbearancemp5283
      @forbearancemp5283 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      LOTS of us watched the Tucker interview. Freidman's facts don't match up.

    • @CrazyYurie
      @CrazyYurie 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@forbearancemp5283 The tucker interview literally is state propaganda.

    • @carylhalfwassen8555
      @carylhalfwassen8555 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Tucker admitted he didn’t know much about Russian or Soviet history or culture. How does that add to his “insights” re Putin and the Kremlin? Even Putin is not happy with the post “interview” blowback. Very disappointed in Tucker interview but understand how delicate the situation was for the production team. Would an earlier death of Navalny just before the scheduled “interview” have changed the direction or tenor of the questions (how many were there?) from Tucker?

    • @forbearancemp5283
      @forbearancemp5283 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@carylhalfwassen8555 And What If Navalny died of "blood related" issues? Where's the autopsy ...

    • @nicolasolton
      @nicolasolton 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Triple propaganda S..simonyan, solovyov, skabeyeva.

  • @reversedragon3
    @reversedragon3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    "when you have an exporting power it is an accident waiting to happen ..."
    Yeah, and who did that? The point of repeatedly demanding more "freedom" in China has often been for foreign businesses to try to make money on exporting goods out of China. If we had all supported Mao and tried to prevent the creation of Deng Xiaoping thought and New Democracy, China could have turned inward and focused on its own needs, but we all decided in other countries that we didn't want that, and pressured China to make our goods for us and force all its people to listen to what other countries want or else. Who is really to blame for this?

    • @dm0065
      @dm0065 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      China is in no position to look inward for its own needs. The have to import their fertilizer and other agricultural stuff so they can avoid starving. They need to import oil too, so they can have industry. And if they need to import stuff, they need to secure shipping lanes, especially through the Red Sea. But they cant, they dont have a deep water Navy or the expertise/industry to build one. So they need the US to do it for them, which we did for decades. All of this made it absolutely crucial for China to look for ways to integrate into the world economy, cause they couldnt expect to receive what they needed without sending things out. So this is their mess, its not anybody else's fault.

    • @rambleon3698
      @rambleon3698 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@dm0065
      Lol..

  • @NotsoWeirdperson
    @NotsoWeirdperson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

    Well this speaker lives in a different planet!😂

    • @gyurmethlodroe1774
      @gyurmethlodroe1774 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes...how is weather on Mars?

    • @cooldudecs
      @cooldudecs 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      or maybe you do... He has studied Russia all his life

    • @AR-tl5cd
      @AR-tl5cd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The expression is, “lives on a different planet.” Your planet is either planet Little Pink or Ruski Mir and both are lost causes.

    • @Babalouie59
      @Babalouie59 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smug ignorance is not helpful to this discussion.

    • @roxylius7550
      @roxylius7550 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@cooldudecsdude has produced inaccurate lie all his life. There corrected you

  • @TheDavidlloydjones
    @TheDavidlloydjones 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    One of the most ignored facts in all of economic history is that from the US Civil War through WWI, the world's armies ran on cotton: gun cotton. Until the Haber-Frisch process made cheap fixed nitrogen possible, every artillery shell in the world needed nine pounds of cotton.
    That is what fueled American export strength and the rise of America as an economic power. Gun-cotton.

    • @geofflewis8599
      @geofflewis8599 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      trinitrocellulose..

    • @NothingIsKnown00
      @NothingIsKnown00 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interest level 9/10. Well done.

    • @richardvsessions1302
      @richardvsessions1302 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In explosive: Nitrocellulosic explosives
      (guncotton) in 1845 by dipping cotton in a mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids and then removing the acids by washing with water, he hoped to obtain a propellant for military weapons.

    • @hiddenharmonicssystemforwi4484
      @hiddenharmonicssystemforwi4484 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And cotton was really cheap to produce ! Hint hint

    • @washuneluvhada7616
      @washuneluvhada7616 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@hiddenharmonicssystemforwi4484that's why they regime changed the Hawaiian queen 🤡

  • @greggcal4583
    @greggcal4583 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Mr. Friedman is always a thoughtful interview. I enjoy his historical view of things and think he is generally right. Ukraine and China along with the ME are so interesting right now with lots of moving parts.

    • @gmw3083
      @gmw3083 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      He says 'at no time has Russia been victorious.' Except they took Mariupol and Bakhmut. They are in the process of taking Avdievka. These are just the major battlegrounds. Russia has regained the territory lost in Kharkov and kherson. Ukraine is falling back everywhere and have to mug unsuspecting conscripts.

    • @greggcal4583
      @greggcal4583 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@gmw3083 The fact that Putin has not had a victory march through Kiev by this point shows that Russia is being bled. Ukraine is tiny in comparison, so the stalemate/quagmire scenario rears its head. Ukraine is mugging conscripts and Russia is emptying prisons. The war is and always was the Russians to lose.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is not fact based and is disinformation trying to fool people.

    • @michaeldelisieux5252
      @michaeldelisieux5252 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      What Mr Friedman said was that Ukraine is hanging in there; that this war is between the Russian Federation and the U.S. and that the U.S. had no losses of American lives ( only two agents if I recall well what was said). Russia has the second most powerful armed forces in the world and has not been able, until now, to decisively defeat Ukraine ( what would characterize a “stalemate”). That Ukraine, a peripheral, weak country resisting for two years the Russian might, is, already for Russia, a defeat.

    • @gmw3083
      @gmw3083 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@michaeldelisieux5252 2nd attempt at posting. Very little of what this guy says is true. I can't provide details or the post will disappear. Look elsewhere for facts...

  • @geoff9858
    @geoff9858 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    😂😂😂 Thank you for redefining the term "STALEMATE" george

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The frontline hasn't moved in 8 months, that's NOT a stalemate?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@AlejandroRodriguez-wp8tj, how much land did Russia take in 2023?
      In 2022 Russia went from 7% of the land to 27% of the land. Before 2022 was over Ukraine took back 9% of the land.
      Leaving Russia with 18% of the land, that number hasn't changed one percentage point for all of 2023.
      Not taking or losing 1% of land in a year is a stalemate.

    • @geofflepper3207
      @geofflepper3207 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@AlejandroRodriguez-wp8tj
      So Russian forces have advanced how far in this one spot in a very long front line in two years? 10 km?
      And only so long as Ukraine doesn't receive more American aid?
      Sounds like a stalemate to me.
      How many thousand years is Putin willing to take to conquer Ukraine?
      Given Russia's demographic decline while western countries such as Britain, Canada and the United States quickly gain population
      that's not a battle of industrial might that Russia should want to engage in.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@AlejandroRodriguez-wp8tj,
      Russian population:
      1990 148 million
      2022 142 million
      You don't see the problem?
      USA population:
      1990 250 million
      2023 340 million
      See how it works?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AlejandroRodriguez-wp8tj, that Russia is dying. Their birthrate is too low and the war will make it lower. They have no immigration, their top people are actually emigrating. All the west has to do is wait it out.

  • @philj5518
    @philj5518 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Friedman is a lousy chess player. Peace

    • @jakebarnes28
      @jakebarnes28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Says invisible guy on Internet comment section

  • @winstonpeckson8019
    @winstonpeckson8019 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    But Chinese debt is mainly in the local currency..they don’t have a foreign currency debt problem

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Al Jazeera
      By Hanna Duggal
      Published On 31 May 2023
      How does US debt rank compared with the rest of the world?
      The United States has the world’s highest national debt with $30.1 trillion owed to creditors as of the first quarter of 2023. Washington’s debt now stands at $31.4 ($33 now) trillion, raising further concerns about US government spending and borrowing costs.
      To put that in context, the US owes as much money as the next four countries with the highest debt including China ($14 trillion), Japan ($10.2 trillion), France ($3.1 trillion) and Italy ($2.9 trillion).

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@stayfree870, why are you showing numbers and NOT percent of GDP?
      Japan 255%
      Greece 168%
      Singapore 168%
      Italy 144%
      United States* 123%
      France 110%
      Portugal 108%
      Spain 107%
      Canada* 106%
      Belgium 106%

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So why won't they let their currency float on the open market? You keep it in house when money is fleeing.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @maphezdlin Because GDP is different for each country since costs of living are different and exchange rates are different, as if you didn't already know that. I gave the name of my source Al Jazeera, which is neither pro China or pro USA. You didn't disclose your source, and you didn't even include China in your list.
      Japan is so screwed. Braden screwed all of us up. Trump wouldn't have allowed this to happen on his watch.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      From AXIOS.
      Jan 22, 2024 -
      Economy
      U.S. debt hits record high as rich economies pile on IOUs
      headshot
      By Deena Zaidi
      By the numbers: In the last century, the U.S. federal debt has risen from an inflation-adjusted $403 billion in 1923 to $33.17 trillion in 2023.
      The U.S. debt-to-GDP ratio surpassed 100% in 2013 and currently stands at 123%, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
      Zoom in: The U.S. has plenty of company. Virtually every other major government across the world has aggressively tapped into global debt markets.
      Japan has the highest debt-to-GDP ratio at 255%. Its national debt has floated above 100% of its GDP for more than two decades.
      China's national debt is above 80 percent of its GDP, according to IMF data.

  • @pbierre
    @pbierre 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    One thing to dangle in front of Putin is NATO creating a Temporary Emergency Accession (TEA) status given to Ukraine which disallows permanent NATO membership, but affords temporary accession while under attack -- reverting to neutrality in peacetime. Wouldn't that give Russia something it claims it wants (keeping Ukraine from becming a permanent NATO member)? Also, a long-term lease (conditional on non-aggression) for Sevastopol would save face, as well as reviving the Minsk Agreement. NATO allies must begin to think creatively and strategically, instead of risk-averse / indecisive.

    • @maegorbalerion
      @maegorbalerion 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Keep dreaming . Youre losing . U must stay in your own yard

  • @bearowen5480
    @bearowen5480 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    American [national] debt will "be taken care of"? Really? How? We're at 124% Federal debt to GDP ratio right now and growing daily. Congress can't or won't address that looming disaster. I don't see that "getting taken care of" without a national economic calamity. The "fat lady died" 😊in 1929, and the economic suffering was enormous. It took Pearl Harbor and a catastrophic world war for America's economy to recover.

    • @johnkelly_Ebiz
      @johnkelly_Ebiz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Depends who your friends are "Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws", Mayer Amschel Roxxxxhild

    • @jeanraymond9114
      @jeanraymond9114 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A national value added tax as every major country has would take care of the debt deficit .

    • @bearowen5480
      @bearowen5480 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@jeanraymond9114 Increased taxes, VAT or otherwise is not the answer, reduced spending and a smaller government are!

    • @economiccrisis9267
      @economiccrisis9267 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@bearowen5480 you do know that taxes have to be raised at some point right ? Y'all are afraid to support the tough choices

    • @paulmurphy8549
      @paulmurphy8549 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Countries go to war when they can't or don't want ti pay the bills

  • @philbyd
    @philbyd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Fascinating, thanks for posting this for posting this for us to understand

    • @gus892
      @gus892 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China wants Foreign investment so it can steal technology , recruit
      spies and interfere and control those businesses .

  • @nadiawheeler4772
    @nadiawheeler4772 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    He gives no evidence for his claims

  • @stayfree870
    @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    He's comparing China's debt vs our 34 trillions debt?

    • @greggcal4583
      @greggcal4583 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Their debt is of a magnitude larger and they are poor. We seem to be the cleanest shirt in the laundry.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When the truth is not on your side, empty words are all you have, can't cite collaborating sources.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Al Jazeera
      By Hanna Duggal
      Published On 31 May 2023
      How does US debt rank compared with the rest of the world?
      The United States has the world’s highest national debt with $30.1 trillion owed to creditors as of the first quarter of 2023. Washington’s debt now stands at $31.4 trillion, raising further concerns about US government spending and borrowing costs.
      To put that in context, the US owes as much money as the next four countries with the highest debt including China ($14 trillion), Japan ($10.2 trillion), France ($3.1 trillion) and Italy ($2.9 trillion).

    • @2paulcoyle
      @2paulcoyle 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      China has to borrow in Dollar loans, to pay back in Dollar loans. This is the same problem that near death imperial Manchu(?) China had a the end of the 1800's.
      Chinese currency the Yuan is not acceptable out side of China. No one will loan Dollars or Euros for Chinese bonds.
      There are not enough Dollars circulating in China to meet all the demands. Outside of China is a flood of Dollars looking to invest.
      In short China is in a real pickle. A jamb. Between a rock and hard place.

    • @seanlee3863
      @seanlee3863 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@greggcal45837 trillion national debt isn't. Their Corporate is larger but that's much much easier to leverage and restructure

  • @glenngrowe7105
    @glenngrowe7105 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Informative and perceptive comments on Russia/Ukraine, China, and the Middle East. Thanks.

    • @Decoy0527
      @Decoy0527 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I would call it wishful thinking. This guy doesn't live in the real world.

    • @dannydadog1987
      @dannydadog1987 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @umbrellastudio7481
      For most westerners it would be, because 80-90% (especially in US) are abysmally ignorant/disinformed about totalitarian states and world in general compared to mos

    • @charleswomack2166
      @charleswomack2166 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@umbrellastudio7481wumao?

  • @willsteel1631
    @willsteel1631 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Friedman, it’s not quite right. Thank you for the video.

  • @tubegersh
    @tubegersh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    George, in 1973 they DID know of the forecoming onslaught. They chose not to mobilise in order not to be "seen as the aggressor"

  • @robhead22
    @robhead22 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Winderful. Thank you!

  • @СтарикРозенбом-г9е
    @СтарикРозенбом-г9е 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +96

    Friedman absolutely does not understand the essence of the conflict.

    • @Cornel1001
      @Cornel1001 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The did not alow the complete colapse of CCCP in 1991. Now they are desoriented ! They try to pet an adders !

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Explain? Is Ukraine not a stalemate? Does Israel not need an eventual settlement with Palestine?

    • @marekrudnicki4645
      @marekrudnicki4645 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@maphezdlin Listen to what colonel Douglas Macgregor says about the war in Ukraine.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@marekrudnicki4645, please give me some of his claims. Why am I supposed to search for what you are implying he has said? Do other military leaders disagree with him?

    • @tudonegrony6417
      @tudonegrony6417 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Excuse my!
      He G.F. perfectly understands the conflict in Ukraine, but lies shamelessly, as do the other politicians in the US government, including the vassals governments from EU + UK, Australia & Japonia …
      He does nothing but fulfill a request (mission) that was given to him…

  • @tonytan6547
    @tonytan6547 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    This guy lives in the well , and thinks that is "the world"
    He is so intoxicated with his own thoughts that he stops to think n reason
    indepently.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is disinformation.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Example? What did he get wrong? Or are you going to be as vague as possible?

    • @sveng3192
      @sveng3192 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​​@@maphezdlin What he got wrong is that Ukraine is already destroyed. There is no stalemate. Russia is the biggest country in the wirld. Russia is now also the strongest country in the world.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sveng3192, then why hasn't the frontline moved in 8 months? Russia is only the biggest Country in land mass.
      It is the 8th biggest economy in the world, just behind France.
      It is the 9th most populace Country in the world just behind Bangladesh.
      It spends $87 billion per year on military, the US spends $877 billion per year.
      If it's the strongest Country why can't it defeat Ukraine? Why is it not allowing it's currency to float?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@sveng3192
      GDP
      Russia $1.7 trillion
      New York $2.1 trillion
      Texas $2.4 trillion
      California $3.6 trillion
      USA $27.6 trillion

  • @paulrobinson4439
    @paulrobinson4439 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    😅I have been going to China since the late 80s. There were always two Chinas the developing South East with It's capital in Shanghai and the underdeveloped rest. China is still a developing country

  • @Am-vo5cu
    @Am-vo5cu 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lies . How can an old man lie

  • @themtoniraniremaxbroker2447
    @themtoniraniremaxbroker2447 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Many thanks for doing this, Riveting!!

  • @Robert-n5t9v
    @Robert-n5t9v 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    I never read more wishful thinking then as is said here.

    • @titorodriguez4628
      @titorodriguez4628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Are you gettinga paycheck from him???....🙄

  • @scottweaverphotovideo
    @scottweaverphotovideo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    During the Israel discussion section he referred to Hamas several times but never Gazan's or Palestinians. So he seems to want all Gazan's to appear to be Hamas. More than 15 thousand dead Palestinian women and children are not Hamas.

  • @nickflynn666
    @nickflynn666 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I never much rated George Friedman but on this occasion he impressed me. The sheer quantity of butt hurt Kremlin bots in the comments is hilarious, its amazing how much effort they put trying to sway the comment section with their tedious talking points 'ItS NOt a StalEMATE" "AmERicA DyInG" "RusSIA PoWERFULL" yeah right, save it for Ticktok guys.

    • @elmohead
      @elmohead 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's not a stalemate atm. Ukraine is retreating. Whatever land Russia took, Ukraine cannot retake.

    • @psychohist
      @psychohist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@elmohead Ukraine retook all of Kharkiv oblast. It's a bit of a seesaw, but still fundamentally a stalemate, and that's with only halfhearted support from the US.

    • @johnschuh8616
      @johnschuh8616 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He seems to imply that the U.S.A. planned to suck Russia into this war,or something like this! The conflict certainly has really been a kick in the belly to the Germans and yb extension to the EU But how does the U S profit?
      😮

  • @timothybybee4535
    @timothybybee4535 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant analysis of what's really happening...thank you...keep up the great journalism and sharing truth...

  • @ricktasker8248
    @ricktasker8248 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The insightful George Friedman at the top of his game. Great, thanks.

  • @peterweicker77
    @peterweicker77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Small point of order. After 1973 the consensus was that Israel could be beaten, but the cost would be catastrophic, so don't try it. Then in 2006 Hezbollah, outgunned and outnumbered, with Israeli armor carpeting southern Lebanon under Israeli jets operating a few minutes from their bases, slugged it out from fixed positions and fought the army to a standstill. Without incurring a prohibitive cost.
    So, that leaves nukes, but anyone who can read without moving their lips knows that no nuclear monopoly can be maintained forever. Nor can a state of siege. If you're a small country you can't make yourself a superpower through magical thinking. Israel will have to face facts and make compromises they don't want to sooner or later.

  • @DorJinTan
    @DorJinTan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    This guy talking bout america, right...

  • @herbertpoller5634
    @herbertpoller5634 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very wise words, food for the mind

  • @lupus7194
    @lupus7194 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    I find all this anti China stuff hard to believe. China seems to be in the process of massive growth in its car manufacturing industry, the single biggest industry in the world. Same thing in trucks, buses, agricultural machinery and construction machinery. Meanwhile, Aliexpress, Shein and Temu have laid waste to the retail industry. These are all the actions of a superpower going to the next level not a country in distress. George sounds to me like he's talking the thinktank talk - highly negative about both Russia and China as needed to earn government consulting fees.

    • @Charles-yq8vv
      @Charles-yq8vv 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Domestic consumer sentiment in China is in the shitter, and that's in a country that doesn't spend much even in great times. Those vehicles need export markets, which dovetails with what he said.

    • @beauvanderputt4236
      @beauvanderputt4236 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The cars and trucks are rubbish they have to sell cheap, nobody except the Chinese wants them

    • @jakebarnes28
      @jakebarnes28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It only sounds like that to you. You're a salesman for China and Russia. You love the echo. China's rise is due to western investment.

    • @MrMurica
      @MrMurica 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Temu has laid waste to retail"
      Lol, LMAO even

    • @tofu666
      @tofu666 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China's housing market is in a deep crisis which makes up a far too big chunk of their GDP;
      foreign investment is on an all time low;
      youth unemployment is alarmingly high since the pandemic;
      the closure of massive factories ruin the local economy and former buzzing places are now barren and empy;
      domestic consumption is low and the economy is too dependent on exports alone;
      a lot of the EVs you mentioned are parked in European ports without being sold;
      ...

  • @stevenjohnston7809
    @stevenjohnston7809 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Insightful. Thanks for the video

  • @jron20r51
    @jron20r51 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    This is a different spin.....I always like to see where some of these folks get their money aka disclosures to know who they are speaking for..

    • @benangel3268
      @benangel3268 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I ask the same thing about mainstream media

    • @ГлебВерховский-п2р
      @ГлебВерховский-п2р 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@benangel3268 I ask the same question about fringe media (the opposite of "mainstream")

    • @benangel3268
      @benangel3268 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @user-oc6dh2yp2w
      It is always good to keep in mind for example which political bias. Where they gain their money from may be or may not be what influences their content. Are they wishing to change the system in their own country?, are they concerned about their own countries excessive domination in the world? Have they become "fringe" because they would be even less free to present an alternative viewpoint working for the mainstream media?
      One question I always ask is whether mainstream media is being influenced by the global capitalists who also lobby and influence governments.
      Which side of a war they support will always be the side that potentiatially benefits western and Israeli global capitalist interests.

  • @gregwang8628
    @gregwang8628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The future is in people’s hands!

  • @ntlineman
    @ntlineman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When you say that Israel is an economic superpower you have to point out because of the economic support of the USA.

    • @carylhalfwassen8555
      @carylhalfwassen8555 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Israel has citizens who are hard working, entrepreneurial, capitalistic. That is why Israel attracts investments and talent. Without those characteristics the land that is labeled Israel on a map would be inhabited by less talented and business oriented tribal populations.

  • @Maxfr8
    @Maxfr8 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Considering that all Russia has to do is maintain what they occupy, then it is a victory for said country.

  • @colinbates8498
    @colinbates8498 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    This sounds like a fairy tale dreamed up in bath tub during a gas leak

    • @默-c1r
      @默-c1r 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you made me laugh so hard 😂

  • @KDean22
    @KDean22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    NO EQUAL TO GEORGE

  • @rudyinthesky4967
    @rudyinthesky4967 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    What planet is this guy from?

    • @WilliamOng-c8n
      @WilliamOng-c8n 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      George is from Mars!

  • @eggtan4051
    @eggtan4051 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I truly Pity this man, Mentality,He is still living in History.OMG all twisted Report & Update about China.😢😢Poor man living in his own world of Believed.

  • @boloalain4082
    @boloalain4082 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    ‘Stalemate is a defeat for Russia’…😂!!! Ok, so if the Nazi would have kept the north part of France in 1945 then it would have been a defeat for them? Pdt Zelinsky said Ukraine must re conquer ALL the territoires lost to Russia .
    You guys have a strange sense of humour

    • @fotisstamoulos4792
      @fotisstamoulos4792 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They are just mouthpieces of the western propaganda getting paid for misleading the people

    • @truthseeker6116
      @truthseeker6116 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A stalemate would be a catastrophe for Russia. Its GDP is just too small to supply, equip a large occupation force and rebuild the areas it illegally occupies. The sanctions will never end and eventually the Russian sovereign wealth fund will run out, also the oil and gas infrastructure will collapse without Western expertise and equipment. Ukraine meanwhile has the support and economic backing of most of the world. Russia is heading for total collapse because Putin does not care about the Russian people and will bankrupt the country to try to achieve his goals.

  • @josephphoenix1376
    @josephphoenix1376 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Excellent Episode 👍
    Always Insightful 🤔

  • @KDean22
    @KDean22 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    GEORGE IS AN AWESOME ANALYST. HE KNOWS HIS SHIT

    • @fongponto
      @fongponto 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      .... you ment?
      He knows shit

    • @titorodriguez4628
      @titorodriguez4628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He is also...Sh%$

  • @Samuel-ts5dh
    @Samuel-ts5dh 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I wonder why George Friedman is wrong here in his analysis. I hope he will analyze more rather than just confined himself to purported western media.

  • @josephlee4337
    @josephlee4337 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Sir, with all due respect, you don't know what is going on with the war between Russia and Ukraine! I am shocked. By the way, the books behind you, do you read any of them or they are there just for show?

    • @cyrilbujor9909
      @cyrilbujor9909 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mr ....with due respect....you don't know what you are talking....because Ukraine is finished.....and for russia to take a big portion of their land.....

  • @lowtech_1
    @lowtech_1 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This is just reshaping the narrative.

    • @stayfree870
      @stayfree870 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Same like damage control.

  • @JoeStrange709
    @JoeStrange709 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Do people really eat up this slop you are serving?
    Sheesh...

  • @hypocritehater1673
    @hypocritehater1673 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Lots of books don't go hand in hand with his brain😂

  • @pedtrog6443
    @pedtrog6443 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    A very interesting interview. Thank you.

  • @philipgr100
    @philipgr100 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    China is in deep trouble financially. They, like Japan, are suffering from deflation. Their manufacturing costs are higher than the manufactured goods selling price. The Chinese people are holding onto their cash and are not spending. Their real estate sector has collapsed. One of their biggest real estate companies, Evergrande, has been declared bankrupt by a Hong Kong court in response to an action brought by foreign investors. Their Belt and Road program is in dire straits as there are a lot of unfinished projects and the countries in which these projects are have not been paying their debts they incurred with China. China is facing a dilemma 1) do they finish these projects at their own expense and hope to receive payment in the future, or 2) do they write them off. Another problem China has is that foreign investors are pulling their investments out of China. Being Russia's best buddy is also not helping them.

  • @davidcritchley3509
    @davidcritchley3509 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If it was a stalemate.which it isn't. Russia is advancing all rhe time. Now taking the biggest Ukrainian fortress in Donbas after taking Backmut. You are way behind the curve!!

  • @tomk8729
    @tomk8729 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    China certainly has major difficulties but I'm not clear who would be fighting whom in a civil war.

    • @carylhalfwassen8555
      @carylhalfwassen8555 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He said that he does not know where civil war sides will emerge.

  • @colinbates8498
    @colinbates8498 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Some very good understanding of overall world politics & the behavior of traders/finance versus military options & ambitions

  • @richardgoldblatt5882
    @richardgoldblatt5882 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He said he could talk about China all day. He would be giving us false information about China all day

  • @AnitaCorbett
    @AnitaCorbett 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Nice to hear from you George !!

  • @michaelnitake2534
    @michaelnitake2534 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Brilliant and illuminating

  • @GOBEF3
    @GOBEF3 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Old George shot his arrows to an imagined wall way back in the last century. And has been drawing circles around them ever since 😂

  • @jimmcfarland9318
    @jimmcfarland9318 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did Israeli health officials miss the dangers caused by the shots? Why did they minimize the tragic effects?
    Same answer will apply to the Intel failure. Fear.
    Ezekiel 33 explains it, but I will summarize:
    When the shepherd sees the wolf, the lion and the bear approach, he must warn the other watchers; if he hides his face, through fear, the flock is in danger. The blood is on the head of that person.
    As a Christian, I see this in the Southern Baptist Convention, which went along with the evil, conspiring against wisdom, misusing even Scripture to justify the government and the mandates.
    Cowardice is unseemly for shepherds, and false prophets told their people that G-D would want the people to submit.
    I have clean hands, but I am a nobody. Who listens?

  • @pauldillon3179
    @pauldillon3179 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks

  • @davidwestwater2219
    @davidwestwater2219 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    This guy peaked in like nineteen eighty four and he's been clueless since like nineteen ninety.

    • @DorJinTan
      @DorJinTan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LOL Hahaha good one!

  • @SkyGlitchGalaxy
    @SkyGlitchGalaxy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    There is no sign of a stalemate in Ukraine.
    China this year is set to build 60% of the world shipping.
    USA doesn't have a shipping industry outside of military ships.
    But he thinks China won't be a great naval power?
    This guy is doing the Peter Zeihan hustle 😂

  • @danbuckles2745
    @danbuckles2745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    The Russian economy is failing as the Ruble is clasping and there is 15% inflation. The people are angry and ready for change and the US needs to fund the Ukrainians and keep the pressure on.

    • @mattyghost3409
      @mattyghost3409 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It will take 2 more yrs

    • @titorodriguez4628
      @titorodriguez4628 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sure...🙄

    • @mxtreme87
      @mxtreme87 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol, seen Carlson tucker shopping in Russia?? No inflation like u talking about

    • @dixonpinfold2582
      @dixonpinfold2582 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The rouble isn't falling. It's lower than before the war and in my view its outlook is quite negative, but it is currently steady. It's where it was 8 months ago. On inflation you are either badly mistaken or unbelievably well informed. The official rate is 7.4%. But Russian government statistics in wartime are unlikely to be accurate, so no one knows. Maybe you're thinking of the central bank base interest rate (16%).

    • @danbuckles2745
      @danbuckles2745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Rouble is falling with all major currencies which makes everything more expensive along with the increase in war time spending making it a war time economy sucking the life out of the rest of the economy. More sanctions are going to make it worse. If the economy fails so does Putin and we may see a rerun of the Berlin Wall. Republicans have to pass the bill for more ammunition.

  • @ansonstiles
    @ansonstiles 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent material

  • @garrybuckley1503
    @garrybuckley1503 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Wow the propaganda in this is off the chart

    • @TonyW-z9w
      @TonyW-z9w 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The guest is a space cadet.

  • @covasolar1224
    @covasolar1224 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    in 1992 ukraine thought they will live in peace as promised by usa, britain, rusia.
    dont talk peace to ukraine.

  • @wrongthinker843
    @wrongthinker843 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Ah, yes. Assert the other person's goals and mock them for not achieving those. Call every disagreement with those goals a lie.
    The state of western "intellectuals".

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are saying Russia has achieved it's goals? How is this mocking?

    • @wrongthinker843
      @wrongthinker843 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@maphezdlin You struggle with basic english, huh?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wrongthinker843, so are you ripping on the fact that I put an apostrophe on "its" or you're telling me that Russia has achieved its goals? Or you're saying Russia hasn't achieved its goals, but no one has the right to point that out?

    • @wrongthinker843
      @wrongthinker843 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@maphezdlin I'm ripping on the fact that a dead rat appears to have higher IQ.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wrongthinker843, oh I see insults. You haven't answered any questions. See if you can come up with more insults though.
      “When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”
      Anonymous
      Ad hominem definition:
      "Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself. This avoids genuine debate by creating a diversion to
      some irrelevant but often highly charged issue."
      Argumentum Ad Hominem: Fallacious argument that attacks not an opponent's beliefs but his motives or character.
      Ad hominem arguments can take many forms, from basic name-calling to more complex rhetoric. For example, an ad hominem argument can involve simply
      insulting a person instead of properly replying to a point that they raised, or it can involve questioning their motives in response to their criticism of the current state of things.

  • @ziggyc3004
    @ziggyc3004 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Friedman is a legend.

    • @peredavi
      @peredavi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In his own mind?

    • @ziggyc3004
      @ziggyc3004 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@peredaviIn yours too, rent free.

  • @eggtan4051
    @eggtan4051 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I bet,he haven't been to China for at least a decade..He is still leaving in a Well,looking upward into the sky, believing that The Sky is round & only that Big.😂😅😂

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the notion that rural china is 'third world' is really outdated. Today rural chinese have it better than rural americans. At least they own their homes and don't have an opioid epidemic

    • @saeedmustapha1334
      @saeedmustapha1334 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😂😂😂❤❤

  • @DumstigB
    @DumstigB 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    By their policies and actions, the US has shown themselves to be cowards everywhere

  • @mjmf1430
    @mjmf1430 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Isn’t Russia winning over Ukraine having taking 1/4 of it?

    • @GDB11
      @GDB11 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Russia just occupied empty fields and no major city. And they are stuck with that for the last 2 years.
      So no, they are not winning

    • @shadeofblue84
      @shadeofblue84 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GDB11of course Ukraine is winning, not only they cant take back crimea after 10 years, they cant even take back Donetsk city with troops at 15 km from the city.

    • @mostevil1082
      @mostevil1082 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They lost most of what they took. They're currently inching forwards again but not fast enough that you can realistically say winning. Initiative maybe but it's a long way from either side winning.

  • @seandonoghue8197
    @seandonoghue8197 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    One thing it isnt, is a stalemate

  • @alistermacdonald6888
    @alistermacdonald6888 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Stalemate is a game with rules coming to a repetitive set of moves. War is not like that. Alternatives exist during a DEADLOCK on the frontlines. Russia hits at civilians. Ukraine disables logistics. The latter is a winning alternative like shaping the battlefield. No stalemate in sight.

    • @johnm7267
      @johnm7267 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ukraine killed 14,000 ethnic Russians between 2014 and 2022. Since the beginning of the war 10,000 civilians have been killed by both sides including 560 children. In 7 months Israel has killed 30,000 civilians including 12,000 children. Get your facts right

  • @grantadamson3478
    @grantadamson3478 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think it's sheer arrogance to say that the US will negotiate with Russia on what happens in Ukraine.

  • @Tyler-wl8kq
    @Tyler-wl8kq 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Friedman knows the truth and the truth shall set you free, people must learn

    • @Toughcrwd_14
      @Toughcrwd_14 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Indeed

    • @kevoreilly6557
      @kevoreilly6557 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      His truth is war

  • @spiridoulahalikia1300
    @spiridoulahalikia1300 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I thought Ukrainia has already lost 1/4 of its territory,so i don't know what this guy is talking about.

  • @taghiabiri3489
    @taghiabiri3489 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Top 👍

  • @ET-vj1zc
    @ET-vj1zc 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    George Friedman has amazing clarity of the world views. It would be interesting to hear his US analysis.

  • @mikelauzon9139
    @mikelauzon9139 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +48

    I'm sorry to see that friedman is no longer in touch with military reality

    • @nataliebrown2658
      @nataliebrown2658 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Looks like he is not in touch even with his own reality.

    • @koffim.kouakou1745
      @koffim.kouakou1745 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      😂Indeed, Mr. Friedman is out of touch on so many pointers beyond military matters.
      His worldview on China and Russia is way outdated, and coloured by so many ideological blindspots. It's laughable.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@koffim.kouakou1745, China and Russia aren't in major trouble? Why doesn't either nation leave their currencies floating on the open markets?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      What did he get wrong militarily?

    • @vicmarx-sl5xz
      @vicmarx-sl5xz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@maphezdlinWhat did he get right?

  • @KrishnaKrishna-p2j
    @KrishnaKrishna-p2j 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hare Krishna

  • @saeedmustapha1334
    @saeedmustapha1334 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Two blind men on this one.

    • @AR-tl5cd
      @AR-tl5cd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pray do tell why they’re so misguided? We’d love to hear your expert opinion.

  • @joewilder
    @joewilder 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    George says the US debt will be taken care of. How is that going to happen?

  • @augenbutter
    @augenbutter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ukraine could be living in peace. Undermining the Minsk accords and Boris coming in waving the finger at Zelinski might have something to do with peace staying an illusion.

  • @colinbates8498
    @colinbates8498 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    America can't field a big army,like Chna can.America has to spend a lot of money to protect its aircraft carriers.They can be economically destroyed with drones working together with missiles,no navy of their own in sight.Aircraft carriers are busy being pushed into the inevitable death that took the battle ships out.Military capability changes when weapons change.A large Navy & manned fighters & bombers could be on their way out.Hypersonic missles,for one,are changing how to play chess.So back to the arms race.
    History teaches that new kinds if weapons will eventually be used.The danger of WW3 pops up.One of our Western European problems is the decline in morals.The kind if people in charge are rotten to the core.That doesn't play out well for us in the West,or for anyone world wide.lts not a good situation for anyone

  • @margaritadimitrova7356
    @margaritadimitrova7356 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Freedman- waste of time.

  • @psychohist
    @psychohist 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting how much better Friedman understands China now than 20-25 years ago.

  • @toncoumans6985
    @toncoumans6985 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    It's amusing to listen to him embarras himself. The next 2 or 3 years will be very difficult for Mr Friedman and all the NEOCONS.

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're talking about Friedman right? Didn't he predict the Ukraine war in 2007? You think China isn't in danger of collapse? Would you invest money in China right now?

    • @toncoumans6985
      @toncoumans6985 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem with Friedmans predictions are that the outcome is always; America dominates the world then he looks for an analyses to support that. My oun analyses is that the BRICS organisation lead by China is going to be leading in the future. We shall see.

    • @toncoumans6985
      @toncoumans6985 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Friedman may have predicted the war in 2007 but did he anticipate Russia would win and Ukraine would collapse? Did he anticipate the West would be humiliated in Ukraine?

    • @maphezdlin
      @maphezdlin 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@toncoumans6985, no he thought Russia would collapse. You're saying Russia is winning?
      From Wikipedia:
      "Before 2022, Russia occupied 42,000 km2 (16,000 sq mi) of Ukrainian territory (Crimea, and parts of Donetsk and Luhansk), and occupied an additional 119,000 km2 (46,000 sq mi) after its full-scale invasion by March 2022, a total of 161,000 km2 (62,000 sq mi) or almost 27% of Ukraine's territory. By 11 November, the Institute for the Study of War calculated that Ukrainian forces had liberated an area of 74,443 km2 (28,743 sq mi) from Russian occupation, leaving Russia with control of about 18% of Ukraine's territory.["

    • @toncoumans6985
      @toncoumans6985 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The West is winning the propaganda war "hands down". So much that we seem to believe our own propaganda! But an objective observer will have to conclude that Russia has won the economic / sanctions war, they have won the diplomatic war (BRICS, SCO, Global South) and are now dominating the military conflict with Ukraine on the verge of collapse. As a West European with children this makes sad and anxious but I am not going to stick my head in the sand.

  • @NahbehChow
    @NahbehChow 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    is this is an expert god bless america