Absolutely right. Other All rounders like Sakib etc are rated so much above Hardik and Jadeja, the only reason being that they get to perform much often than these 2. In any other side they would have been absolute, match-winning super stars. A rare glimpse of Jadeja's talent could be seen in 2019 world cup semis
Hardik's loss is massive, its not about his all round abilities, its about the confidence and the assurance he provides to team, he always stands up in big match, with him batting down the order, top order can play freely
It came in after loss of one wicket. Also, if he wouldn't have contributed with the bat, it would have been a century against a fifer. Here is a dude who takes 2 catches, scores a blazing unbeaten 29 off 15 and goes in to take 5. Any other match, it would have been MOM but Kohli had this special innings and it ws more ceremonial than anything else
yeah but he did and played brilliant 29 off 15 better strike than any other player in that match helped , basically scored 1/3rd of runs what virat scored and with more than double strike rate , i mean its blatant favouritism at this point@@ShahShahnk
Its great that someone finally looks to the super glue that holds the entire Indian line up together. Now with Hardik out, Jadeja is the only legitimate all rounder in Indian squad and he is the gate that holds the fielding, bowling and batting. Moreover the batsmen can take risk with Jaddu coming at 7 assuring batting depth and bowlers can take risk knowing that not only can he be a lightning in the field but also a bowling fence who can control the chaos from opponents when the other bowlers have a bad day. Sir Jaddu they said and its rightly said❤❤
He actually has not been gotten out in his 4 innings. Once he was run out when he was running an extra run on the last bowl of the match just in case their is some misfielding by the fielder or the WK. The other time he was given a LBW which was not out but the umpire gave out and he didn't ask for the review. He also has the lowest average of any bowler. And you know he can field a lil bit too.
He was the rightful man of the match against SA, with all due respect to the King. His cameo at the end of the Indian innings was valuable as was his fielding.
Ya I agree. 5 wks plus a bunch of runs at the end, and an excellent catch.. Jadeja was certainly more deserving than Kohli.. Although Kohli's century was exceptional too. Especially on that pitch. It looked easy when he was batting, but the true character of the pitch was revealed when India came to bowl.
He was a contender but Kohli should have got MoM and he did. India has won the match the moment they made 250 and there’s a difference between t20 cameo batting and a planned ODI batting and the latter deserves more respect, especially in this t20 era. And india has won the rest of the match the moment pacers took 3-4 initial wickets. Ain’t no way Miller is gonna be chasing 300 on his own if his wicket wasn’t taken down.
Jadeja would have been Player of the Match, if it was not given away as a birthday gift. His had given an all round performance with Bat, Ball and Fielding.
Remove jadeja’s 30 runs, india has already scored 280 odd score on a pitch where 250 is considered more than average. Remove his 5 wickets and the pacers have already taken 3-4 initial wickets and it’s not like miller is gonna chase 300 on his own. But now remove Kohli’s patient knock on a slow pitch, india would have been all out for 180-220 and I bet my ass on this statement. I’m sad that Indian fans have totally lost touch with ODI logics and are completely blinded by the shifty t20 logics that 30 quick runs and 5 tail ender wickets deserves more recognition than a patient beautiful knock.
5 wickets and a key quickfire contribution with the bat by jaddu. Deserved MoM recognition. Kohli's birthday, a hundred and it was a record matching 49th all coincided and robbed him of the award. But we will surely celebrate jaddu's success and Kohli's as well.
If the same innings by Kohli was played by Shreyas, I’m sure Shreyas would have got the MoM. He should have! Don’t you people understand how important and beautiful Kohli’s innings was? I think it’s bad luck that it happened to be his bday and his 49th century that people like you are discrediting that beautiful knock. One aggressive shot from Kohli and the whole team would have collapsed for 240. There’s a difference between a t20 cameo batting like Jadeja’s and a planned ODI knock like Kohli’s. You need to know the difference.
Nana youre wrong. I would have thought if the MoM was biased, if it was a real good pitch to bat on. It wasnt a batting paradise, but rather a paradise for a spinner like jaddu. So, the actual credit goes to how toiled the innings was from Virat. He deserveed the MoM irrespective of personal milestones.
Shardul thakur in the team shows even india didn't believe that they would perform so brilliantly. Even shami wasn't given the chance before pandya injury. India is playing better than thier expectation
People are forgetting that: there is no Rishab pant. Before his accident, Rishab was bringing his Test level form to the ODI's as well. If Rishab played, either Surya or Iyer wouldn't have been in the squad.
@@saunakroychowdhury5990 Please see his Test Stats then talk. Look at his achievements at 25. He is the reason why we won the 2021 Australian Test Series. Start appreciating talent.
But bro, rishab pant odi stats is not that great as test matches ! I am a rishabh pant fan too ✌️the only odi he performed was against England last year in England
Guys, MOM is given for result-deciding play. After Kohli's innings on a difficult pitch, it was almost decided. Jadeja's wickets were more like flogging a dead horse, since seamers had dealt damage already.
Then against Ban, it should have been Jaddu instead of Kohli because 257 was way below par and India won that match before Kohli walked out to bat even
Everytime when 2 players perform ....there are many who think that MOM should have been given to another player ...there is never satisfaction because many people think different....rohit 87 and shami 4 wkt....people thought it should be given to shami...but rohit played very impactful inning there virat was out early......today they want jadeja .....virat played very good innings....but yes jadeja 5 wkt and 29 runs....these 29 also were impactful as we went from 300 to 326 .....so if jadeja had not scored with bat and only 5 wkt then it should be kohli but with jadejas runs with bats it should have been jadeja as MOM...but it was kohlis baday so i wont think it as bias ....they just made it more special for virat and jadeja wont mind that nor should u guys❤
I think it’s bad luck for Kohli because of people like you who discredit his innings by linking bday and 49th century. Bro, that innings on that pitch is one of the best innings! He played the anchor innings and we Indian fans are too dumb to realise it. Too much of t20 does that to a country.
Sir Jadeja is more than an all rounder. An excellent bowler whose subtle variations in pace and spin have dumb-founded even the best of batsmen, plus he completes his deliveries so quickly, he doesnt give the opposite batsman too much time to think. Apart from his bowling, for which alone, he may warrant a place in most international teams, he is one of the best fielders in the world. Few batsmen dare to run further when they see the ball in hands of Jadeja-the fielder. Finally, Jadeja the batsman, has evolved so much over the years. He always had the talent in batting and over the years his significant batting contributions, when India required those crucial runs, have shown how much his batting brings to the table. 3 triple hundreds in first-class cricket cant be an aberration for sure. So, a very capable batsman who may be promoted to bat up the order when Virat and/or Rohit are rested. More than an all-rounder, he has been one of the pillars for Team India. Hardik is very good, but i cant imagine how much will India miss Jadeja once he hangs up his boots! 😢
Strike rate is only relevant on flat deck highways not rank turners. That's why kohli deserved his MoM. Just because India managed 300, people are downplaying Kohli's innings. This innings was very similar to rohit's 87 against England.
rohit scored 40 out of 20 , gill played fast too surya was hitting alot , jadeja did amazing with the bat too, only shreyas struggled at start. jadeja was robbed
@@PrinceLobo-es8kl Tell the complete story. Rohit scored 40 off 20 and then got OUT. While Rohit's innings was mighty impressive and his start made sure that the middle order could take their time, it's also true that he did that against the new ball when it was coming on nicely to the bat. If you remember Kohli too was playing aggressively before Gill got out. By the time gill got out they had put on Maharaj and also they had started bowling slower ones. And as the match progressed batting became harder and harder...to the point where even getting singles was tough. Sure Sky and Jaddu managed to hit a few boundaries in the end and Kohli should've tried to hit more after the 40th over...and it wasn't for lack of trying...he tried a lot in that Shamsi over but managed to hit only a single boundary. It just wasn't coming on to the bat. I'm sure you saw how SA batted on this pitch. Batting was very tough on this pitch. There was a lot of help for the spinners. So before you throw around words like "robbed" remember what Rohit said "can't beat a hundred".
The rightful man of the match was easily Ravi Jadeja . But then the sentiments got kohli the MOM. One looks at Objectiviley...Shreyas Iyer provided the impetus at critical juncture of the innings . .and selflesslly got out . .rather than pushing forva century
Lol keep on crying fucking loser hater of kohli😂😂😂 boohoo "give mom to jadeja, no give it to shreyas, anyone but kohli" I know this is what you clowns been dreaming all day😂 not gonna happen losers 😂
That level of bias is unacceptable Its Jadeja who deserved the man of the match That 100 didn't even come at a strike rate of 100 I understand, one deserves to be selfish every once in a while, but he didn't deserve the man of the match
without kohli this team can't win all matches because he played sensibly or provide stability that's it. If someone has some basic knowledge. They can't argued this topic.
@@rakeshmars9560 oh come on basic knowledge my ass, you guys are the definition of andhbhakt, can't even understand the statement. His 100 was decent, jadega took 5 as well as provided the finish. What I said, in this complete Run of India, the bowlers didn't get enough appreciation. Don't come here like a little Kohli sucker infant. We already have alot of em
@@rakeshmars9560 yeah show your true self bitch. Kohli was playing for his 100 not team, that's why he didn't deserve it, suck that, bigot. Aur Likhne naa aye na, gand utha k aaiyo mat idhar
Do people really understand things Jadeja brings on to the table? Why they call him bits and pieces? He had bowled brilliantly and changed the game against Australia, Bangladesh and recently against Africa. Cricket has become batsman dominated game & hence in all of the games Jadeja didn't get any of man of the match award. I don't mean to devalue kohli or Rahul's knock. But jadeja goes unnoticed by not getting man of the match award. Maybe he didn't pick wicket in all matches but he was economical and his tight bowling provides cushion to other bowlers to pick wickets. Batsman will go after other bowlers when they can't hit jadeja consistently. Indirectly jadeja contribute to wicket. In most of the matches he has picked wickets and is in list of top wicket tacker with 14 overall. Economy less than 4 and average less than 20. Quite brilliant. He is gun fielder and has got medal for catch. Has also been brilliant in ground fielding. With batting he got chance 4 times and just failed once. His partnership with Kohli was crucial against Nz. Provided finishing touch against srilanka and africa. Averages 55 with the bat. With all such contributions why is Jadeja still labelled as bits and pieces??
I posit that this Indian team, in THIS world cup are better than AUS 03 and Aus 07 in terms of bowling. (after 8 games) Explanation : let me start with counter example - SA of 2011 had the best bowling ave. but so did the opponents in all those matches. those were all low scoring matches. IND in 2023 is not like that, they are dominating! The same way AUS obliterated everyone in 07. (Ind and Pakistan bowing out early did help this cause a bit). I wish there was a metric to say how dominant a team was. NRR is okay metric, but it doesn't take wickets into account unless the team is all out. diff between bat avg and bowling avg ? that is not great either but just for fun i looked at it (since 2003 WC) and this is what i found: Aus 07 - bat 62.9 bowl 19.56 Diff 43.3 !! Ind 23 - bat 50.65 bowl 19.02 Diff 31.63 !! Aus 03 - bat 44 bowl 18.33 Diff 25.67 SA 15 - bat 48.53 bowl 25.82 Diff 22.71 SL 11 - bat 45.06 bowl 24.04 Diff 21.02
Not really india is one injury away from great to trash. Injury Bumrah , game over india. You are as good as your weakness. With bumrah holding one end , other two can go on rampage. Neither siraj or shami can be reliably stingy bowlers.
@@reincarnatedmosquitotrash is being harsh. We will go from being perfect to being good. Some players don’t have replacements. It’s like that Aussie side losing McGrath. They might someone who can do a decent job but you can’t replace them.
@@reincarnatedmosquito India already lost someone like that. Hardik. made india only stronger. Regarding bumrah, sure. that will definitely dent india. Same way losing McGrath would have weakened Aus 03 and 07. As mentioned previously by Jarrod, Aus 07 used a combination of M Clark, A Symonds, S Watson for 10 overs. This would not work in today's world.
I can't stop asking why is Bavua in and leading the South African world Cup ODI team? His dismal batting at the top of the order is the is about the worse in the tournament. Drop him and let Markram lead the team rhat is if South Sfrica wants to win the tournament
People commenting about Jadeja not getting mom, I’m speechless from the audacity of that statement lmao. It’s hard to bat in that pitch and Kohli stood his crease. Doesn’t matter the achievements and milestones, the innings was built around him. Some a holes can say that it’s slow or selfish blah blah, just illiterate. And the next thing is, india has won half of the match the moment we scored 250+. All the commentators kept saying that. And when the first 3-4 wickets were taken by the pacers, we won the remaining match. And then Jadeja came and took 5 wickets. Sure there are some big fish in those 5 wickets and sure his aggressive batting made india score 300+. But you don’t understand the anchor of the innings, it’s Kohli. Thus the man of the match!
So ridiculous an observation. Sanjay Manjekar was severely criticised by us all for his unwarranted remark. Jadeja can be retained only for his fielding. His innings with Kohli against SA was gem.
The guy who made almost zero contribution to Indian one day cricket, who's career spanned 5 years tops, but has a loud mouth... Bits and pieces player!! Should be listed in commentary 101, "how not to make yourself look stupid for a lifetime"
Jadeja won us the match. The runs he scored psychologically put south africa under a lot of pressure and wickets he got? Well you know it. Kohli played a slow innings yesterday on purpose. On the other hand shreyas knew we needed runs for a big score and got the guns running , so did KL (WHO IS CALCULATED PLAYER). And you are still gonna tell me Kohli got the man of the match
Slow innings was needed to be played. Making a hundred in a bowlers pitch is difficult. Shreyas and Kohli have pretty much the same strike rate. Facting 100 bowls is a lot more difficult than facing 80 bowls. Of course he crushed it.
It was a rank turner and it is a miracle that we got 300+ on that deck. It wouldn’t be possible if not for Kohli and Shreyas built that partnership with Kohli playing sLoW innings. Even ponting said 260 was a good score on that deck. If anything, it was 50-50 for potm. Stop blindly hating for no reason
@@vaibhavvb9898 The only reason we got to 300 was because Rohit gave them that start . Because of it Kohli and Shreyas had no scoreboard pressure and could bat deep , otherwise they would've gotten out early trying to hit shots against Maharaj.
OZ completing their fairytale in 2023 by beating the teams which defeated them at the start of the tournament would be poetic too. OZ started the tournament losing to India and South Africa and ending the tournament by defeating South Africa in the Semi final and India in the final
I think India will lose semifinal. Too much expectations, extremely weak lower middle order. Too long of a tail. My prediction is that in semi or final India will be asked to chase. For once if their opponents can put a decent score batting first and can take the wickets of Kohli and Rohit cheaply, the rest of batting will crumble. No.6 SKY averages 25. Nos. 8-11 are proper tailenders, complete mugs with the bat. Even if it is just 20 runs to get, if India is 6 down they will lose.
I also thought about the same and it can be a possibility and worst nightmare for ICT and fans. The problem with the scenario is that it would be a little hard against this bowling lineup to set a high target even if an Indian bowler can have a bad day. Such is the form of Indian bowlers that they can cover up for the bad day of a bowler. And if it is sub 300 chase which i think is most likely given only Afghanistan, Newzealand and Bangladesh have made 250+ against them, Indian lineup at least now have the depth to chase sub 300 target even without rohit and kohli.
Seriously what a joke you are, so you mean to say Gill and Rahul are useless? And you still doubting the Indian pace trio and spinners? I am not saying India will def. Win the cup but your comment is absolutely rubbish. Knockouts will be tough and nothing garunteed but keep hope don't be a pessimist.
For all Country fans look at Indian fans crying over Player of the match shamelessly and accusing its because of name ,occasion power ,bias etc etc Typical Indian crying for nothing 😂😂 That was a perfect bowling pitch were 230 was enough So Jadeja and Sky cameos came when the team score was already above par score And for bowling if Kuldeep was bought in place of Jadeja he would have good 5 wickets People watched live knows the value of that 100 Maharaj was Bowling so well that he could have easily got 5 Fer and India bowled out for 220 230 That's were Iyer and Kohli gets credit Even Shamsi legside ball was spinning On this extremely hard Bowling pitch a batsman got Man Of match .rightly so Rather than looking at all these X Y Z we can make it due to name Kohli occasion birthday etc etc etc Typicall Indian fans frustrated by any star player achievement or in Form
typical ungrateful fks that sks their star player till they have nothing left, giving your star player god status. only kohli played will lol. rohit blasted 40 of 24balls, surya did 22 of 14 AND JADEJA DID 29 from 15 with a strike rate of 14. not only that he took 5 wicket and picked 2 catches. if this insnt mom worthy then what is
@PrinceLobo-es8kl typical uncultured Indian showing true character here 😂😂 Anyone would have got 5 Fer third rate local on that pitch Even Kuldeep if he Bowled before The season why Maharaj didn't have 5 is Iyer and Kohli playing him out Must be some Ipl noob from those poison franchise frustrated as usual by Non Team player getting Player of the match
@@PrinceLobo-es8kl Jadeja and Surya can come when they have nothing to lose..to slog😂 If it was easy why South Africa scored at less run rate than Kohli Entire team 83(163).. and 🫏 s believe 100(120) on this pitch is selfish Following your same logic whole South Africa team was slow😂😂😂😂 Who need these Facebook keyboard Ipl strike rate pans approval Cry more
Absolutely right. Other All rounders like Sakib etc are rated so much above Hardik and Jadeja, the only reason being that they get to perform much often than these 2. In any other side they would have been absolute, match-winning super stars. A rare glimpse of Jadeja's talent could be seen in 2019 world cup semis
Yeah Hardik, Jadeja hardly get a chance to bat lol
Hardik's loss is massive, its not about his all round abilities, its about the confidence and the assurance he provides to team, he always stands up in big match, with him batting down the order, top order can play freely
Ya we all saw that in 2019 WC SF 😂
he was not there for 2019 final all we saw is stupid DK @@DaddyjeeFF
just one match and u guys start barking lmao@@DaddyjeeFF
@@DaddyjeeFFno you saw that in champions trophy 2017, t20wc semifinal and several matches for MI
Ankle injuries are bad, I've had one recently, and I winced when Hardik fell on the pitch, i knew it then his campaign has ended. Sad stuff
His fielding is huge plus
He is complete all rounder.
jadeja is like a knight , he performs when you need him the most, and is never a waste in team he will provide by bat or by bowl or with fielding
It came in after loss of one wicket. Also, if he wouldn't have contributed with the bat, it would have been a century against a fifer. Here is a dude who takes 2 catches, scores a blazing unbeaten 29 off 15 and goes in to take 5. Any other match, it would have been MOM but Kohli had this special innings and it ws more ceremonial than anything else
yeah but he did and played brilliant 29 off 15 better strike than any other player in that match helped , basically scored 1/3rd of runs what virat scored and with more than double strike rate , i mean its blatant favouritism at this point@@ShahShahnk
that's why we call him sir jadeja
9 off 22
Its great that someone finally looks to the super glue that holds the entire Indian line up together. Now with Hardik out, Jadeja is the only legitimate all rounder in Indian squad and he is the gate that holds the fielding, bowling and batting. Moreover the batsmen can take risk with Jaddu coming at 7 assuring batting depth and bowlers can take risk knowing that not only can he be a lightning in the field but also a bowling fence who can control the chaos from opponents when the other bowlers have a bad day. Sir Jaddu they said and its rightly said❤❤
Would've been man of the match if anyone else had scored that hundred instead of the king
Yeah
Easily
I agree
Cricket has got biased towards one cricketer
Abe lodu bowling pitch thi wo bhi spinner favour.
May be the one who chose it thought that the pitch was tough to bat on but still According to me It should have been Jaddu
In my opinion Jadeja is 1 of the finest allrounders of the last 2 decades
He actually has not been gotten out in his 4 innings. Once he was run out when he was running an extra run on the last bowl of the match just in case their is some misfielding by the fielder or the WK. The other time he was given a LBW which was not out but the umpire gave out and he didn't ask for the review. He also has the lowest average of any bowler. And you know he can field a lil bit too.
He can field a bit too much.
honestly out of all the things he does. His fielding is the best. World class fielder
Dude !! Get your facts checked. He's the best fielder of the world at the moment.
Field a Lil bit? Are you kidding us?
@@SVKDS10494bro, it's a joke
The talk around this series sometimes and talk around India reminds me of Australia and spring bat talk around 2003 world cup..
He was the rightful man of the match against SA, with all due respect to the King. His cameo at the end of the Indian innings was valuable as was his fielding.
Ya I agree. 5 wks plus a bunch of runs at the end, and an excellent catch.. Jadeja was certainly more deserving than Kohli..
Although Kohli's century was exceptional too. Especially on that pitch. It looked easy when he was batting, but the true character of the pitch was revealed when India came to bowl.
He was a contender but Kohli should have got MoM and he did. India has won the match the moment they made 250 and there’s a difference between t20 cameo batting and a planned ODI batting and the latter deserves more respect, especially in this t20 era.
And india has won the rest of the match the moment pacers took 3-4 initial wickets. Ain’t no way Miller is gonna be chasing 300 on his own if his wicket wasn’t taken down.
Jadeja is one of the most economical bowlers of this Indian team. He keeps the batting team on toes in the middle overs.
Jadeja would have been Player of the Match, if it was not given away as a birthday gift. His had given an all round performance with Bat, Ball and Fielding.
Remove jadeja’s 30 runs, india has already scored 280 odd score on a pitch where 250 is considered more than average.
Remove his 5 wickets and the pacers have already taken 3-4 initial wickets and it’s not like miller is gonna chase 300 on his own.
But now remove Kohli’s patient knock on a slow pitch, india would have been all out for 180-220 and I bet my ass on this statement. I’m sad that Indian fans have totally lost touch with ODI logics and are completely blinded by the shifty t20 logics that 30 quick runs and 5 tail ender wickets deserves more recognition than a patient beautiful knock.
5 wickets and a key quickfire contribution with the bat by jaddu. Deserved MoM recognition. Kohli's birthday, a hundred and it was a record matching 49th all coincided and robbed him of the award. But we will surely celebrate jaddu's success and Kohli's as well.
If the same innings by Kohli was played by Shreyas, I’m sure Shreyas would have got the MoM. He should have!
Don’t you people understand how important and beautiful Kohli’s innings was? I think it’s bad luck that it happened to be his bday and his 49th century that people like you are discrediting that beautiful knock.
One aggressive shot from Kohli and the whole team would have collapsed for 240. There’s a difference between a t20 cameo batting like Jadeja’s and a planned ODI knock like Kohli’s. You need to know the difference.
Nana youre wrong. I would have thought if the MoM was biased, if it was a real good pitch to bat on. It wasnt a batting paradise, but rather a paradise for a spinner like jaddu. So, the actual credit goes to how toiled the innings was from Virat. He deserveed the MoM irrespective of personal milestones.
Jadeja is an excellent fielder. And catches win matches!
indian team just giving their fans so much happiness , i can not even explain
Sir jadeja for a reason...🫡🫡🫡
Sanjay Manjareker is the talent killer commentator of all time..Mumbai lobbyist leader..
Shardul thakur in the team shows even india didn't believe that they would perform so brilliantly.
Even shami wasn't given the chance before pandya injury.
India is playing better than thier expectation
Sir jadeja in his prime.❤
People are forgetting that: there is no Rishab pant.
Before his accident, Rishab was bringing his Test level form to the ODI's as well. If Rishab played, either Surya or Iyer wouldn't have been in the squad.
Rishab Pant is a joke. Team Management is not a fool like you.
@@saunakroychowdhury5990 Please see his Test Stats then talk. Look at his achievements at 25.
He is the reason why we won the 2021 Australian Test Series. Start appreciating talent.
@@saunakroychowdhury5990 He's better than Surya as a batter
But bro, rishab pant odi stats is not that great as test matches ! I am a rishabh pant fan too ✌️the only odi he performed was against England last year in England
@@deepakkairalath Before his accident, he had started to take Odi's seriously, just like tests.
Mohammed Shami "remember the name"
16 Wickets in 4 Matches "remember the name"😂
Dude, a lot of us from India are watching. Time is right, pivot, and make lemonade. Make multiple videos related to India for the next few days.
That's the problem with cricket. Only Indians everywhere. Not great for a sport
Guys, MOM is given for result-deciding play. After Kohli's innings on a difficult pitch, it was almost decided.
Jadeja's wickets were more like flogging a dead horse, since seamers had dealt damage already.
seamers , if am not wrong he took the first few wickets
@@PrinceLobo-es8klYep, Bavuma, Klassen and Miller
Then against Ban, it should have been Jaddu instead of Kohli because 257 was way below par and India won that match before Kohli walked out to bat even
agree@@nishantrajani7372
@@nishantrajani7372bruh ship me whatever you are smoking
Everytime when 2 players perform ....there are many who think that MOM should have been given to another player ...there is never satisfaction because many people think different....rohit 87 and shami 4 wkt....people thought it should be given to shami...but rohit played very impactful inning there virat was out early......today they want jadeja .....virat played very good innings....but yes jadeja 5 wkt and 29 runs....these 29 also were impactful as we went from 300 to 326 .....so if jadeja had not scored with bat and only 5 wkt then it should be kohli but with jadejas runs with bats it should have been jadeja as MOM...but it was kohlis baday so i wont think it as bias ....they just made it more special for virat and jadeja wont mind that nor should u guys❤
actually its the favoritism in any sports if a star performer does sub par and under dogs does something brilliant star player gets the credit
I think it’s bad luck for Kohli because of people like you who discredit his innings by linking bday and 49th century. Bro, that innings on that pitch is one of the best innings! He played the anchor innings and we Indian fans are too dumb to realise it. Too much of t20 does that to a country.
@@dr.downvote u cant understand english?where did i discredited his inning?
Dravid to Rohit, after witnessing Maharaj's performance with the ball : "Activate Sir Jadeja"
Sir Jadeja is more than an all rounder. An excellent bowler whose subtle variations in pace and spin have dumb-founded even the best of batsmen, plus he completes his deliveries so quickly, he doesnt give the opposite batsman too much time to think.
Apart from his bowling, for which alone, he may warrant a place in most international teams, he is one of the best fielders in the world. Few batsmen dare to run further when they see the ball in hands of Jadeja-the fielder.
Finally, Jadeja the batsman, has evolved so much over the years. He always had the talent in batting and over the years his significant batting contributions, when India required those crucial runs, have shown how much his batting brings to the table. 3 triple hundreds in first-class cricket cant be an aberration for sure. So, a very capable batsman who may be promoted to bat up the order when Virat and/or Rohit are rested.
More than an all-rounder, he has been one of the pillars for Team India. Hardik is very good, but i cant imagine how much will India miss Jadeja once he hangs up his boots! 😢
Mate your judgement is the best...and an impeccable explanation...
Strike rate is only relevant on flat deck highways not rank turners. That's why kohli deserved his MoM. Just because India managed 300, people are downplaying Kohli's innings. This innings was very similar to rohit's 87 against England.
rohit scored 40 out of 20 , gill played fast too surya was hitting alot , jadeja did amazing with the bat too, only shreyas struggled at start. jadeja was robbed
@@PrinceLobo-es8kl Tell the complete story. Rohit scored 40 off 20 and then got OUT. While Rohit's innings was mighty impressive and his start made sure that the middle order could take their time, it's also true that he did that against the new ball when it was coming on nicely to the bat. If you remember Kohli too was playing aggressively before Gill got out. By the time gill got out they had put on Maharaj and also they had started bowling slower ones. And as the match progressed batting became harder and harder...to the point where even getting singles was tough. Sure Sky and Jaddu managed to hit a few boundaries in the end and Kohli should've tried to hit more after the 40th over...and it wasn't for lack of trying...he tried a lot in that Shamsi over but managed to hit only a single boundary. It just wasn't coming on to the bat.
I'm sure you saw how SA batted on this pitch. Batting was very tough on this pitch. There was a lot of help for the spinners. So before you throw around words like "robbed" remember what Rohit said "can't beat a hundred".
The rightful man of the match was easily Ravi Jadeja . But then the sentiments got kohli the MOM. One looks at Objectiviley...Shreyas Iyer provided the impetus at critical juncture of the innings . .and selflesslly got out . .rather than pushing forva century
Lol keep on crying fucking loser hater of kohli😂😂😂 boohoo "give mom to jadeja, no give it to shreyas, anyone but kohli" I know this is what you clowns been dreaming all day😂 not gonna happen losers 😂
Nice joke 😂 " selfless" yeah that's what all clowns say when they are unable to score a century😂
@@sastaassh1112not a single ariel shot by kohli while iyyer tried many ariel shot
Sir Jaddu = Third Nipple 💀
-
-
-
-
-
He confused it with "Third Eye" 🗿✨
3:08 even his first shot came off the inside edge, he was lucky to get a boundary.
Jadeja has 3 triple hundreds in first class cricket
😆 🤣 😂 😹
@ 2:13 QDK was out well before when Jadeja came to bowll
What an amazing analysis
"He was bowling despite the fact that Quinton de Kock, a left-hander was at crease" This is wrong, when he came deKock was out -- 2:14 around
yes... he just made a video to milk India for views...
First time me on your channel and surely no one does that type of analysis. Kudos to you for that.
That level of bias is unacceptable
Its Jadeja who deserved the man of the match
That 100 didn't even come at a strike rate of 100
I understand, one deserves to be selfish every once in a while, but he didn't deserve the man of the match
Abe jhatu spin favour pitch thi. Or aise pitch mein kaise man of the match diya jaye jaha per batsman khel bhi nhi pa raha ho?
Actually it's true but with this type of pitch kholi lead the charge its hard to play on this pitch after 30 overs
without kohli this team can't win all matches because he played sensibly or provide stability that's it. If someone has some basic knowledge. They can't argued this topic.
@@rakeshmars9560 oh come on basic knowledge my ass, you guys are the definition of andhbhakt, can't even understand the statement. His 100 was decent, jadega took 5 as well as provided the finish. What I said, in this complete Run of India, the bowlers didn't get enough appreciation.
Don't come here like a little Kohli sucker infant. We already have alot of em
@@rakeshmars9560 yeah show your true self bitch. Kohli was playing for his 100 not team, that's why he didn't deserve it, suck that, bigot. Aur Likhne naa aye na, gand utha k aaiyo mat idhar
How did i miss the channel. Really good analysis
Do people really understand things Jadeja brings on to the table? Why they call him bits and pieces? He had bowled brilliantly and changed the game against Australia, Bangladesh and recently against Africa.
Cricket has become batsman dominated game & hence in all of the games Jadeja didn't get any of man of the match award. I don't mean to devalue kohli or Rahul's knock. But jadeja goes unnoticed by not getting man of the match award.
Maybe he didn't pick wicket in all matches but he was economical and his tight bowling provides cushion to other bowlers to pick wickets. Batsman will go after other bowlers when they can't hit jadeja consistently. Indirectly jadeja contribute to wicket. In most of the matches he has picked wickets and is in list of top wicket tacker with 14 overall. Economy less than 4 and average less than 20. Quite brilliant.
He is gun fielder and has got medal for catch. Has also been brilliant in ground fielding. With batting he got chance 4 times and just failed once. His partnership with Kohli was crucial against Nz. Provided finishing touch against srilanka and africa. Averages 55 with the bat.
With all such contributions why is Jadeja still labelled as bits and pieces??
Bring a comparison between this indian team and Ricky pointing's Australia, which is better?
Only you can do a good comparison between two
This channel deserves a million subscribers.
I posit that this Indian team, in THIS world cup are better than AUS 03 and Aus 07 in terms of bowling. (after 8 games)
Explanation : let me start with counter example - SA of 2011 had the best bowling ave. but so did the opponents in all those matches. those were all low scoring matches.
IND in 2023 is not like that, they are dominating! The same way AUS obliterated everyone in 07. (Ind and Pakistan bowing out early did help this cause a bit).
I wish there was a metric to say how dominant a team was. NRR is okay metric, but it doesn't take wickets into account unless the team is all out. diff between bat avg and bowling avg ? that is not great either but just for fun i looked at it (since 2003 WC) and this is what i found:
Aus 07 - bat 62.9 bowl 19.56 Diff 43.3 !!
Ind 23 - bat 50.65 bowl 19.02 Diff 31.63 !!
Aus 03 - bat 44 bowl 18.33 Diff 25.67
SA 15 - bat 48.53 bowl 25.82 Diff 22.71
SL 11 - bat 45.06 bowl 24.04 Diff 21.02
This is a fairly accurate metric in terms of performance. Add net run rate to the comparison and you will have an idea of the dominance.
Not really india is one injury away from great to trash. Injury Bumrah , game over india. You are as good as your weakness. With bumrah holding one end , other two can go on rampage. Neither siraj or shami can be reliably stingy bowlers.
@@reincarnatedmosquitotrash is being harsh. We will go from being perfect to being good. Some players don’t have replacements. It’s like that Aussie side losing McGrath. They might someone who can do a decent job but you can’t replace them.
@@reincarnatedmosquito India already lost someone like that. Hardik. made india only stronger. Regarding bumrah, sure. that will definitely dent india. Same way losing McGrath would have weakened Aus 03 and 07. As mentioned previously by Jarrod, Aus 07 used a combination of M Clark, A Symonds, S Watson for 10 overs. This would not work in today's world.
@@coolestrock2008 Bumrah is the leader of pack. When you lose leader... everyone will spray the ball
Aussie team never rely on one player
I can't stop asking why is Bavua in and leading the South African world Cup ODI team? His dismal batting at the top of the order is the is about the worse in the tournament. Drop him and let Markram lead the team rhat is if South Sfrica wants to win the tournament
How do you avoid getting copyright?
How're you using footage without getting copyright?
People commenting about Jadeja not getting mom, I’m speechless from the audacity of that statement lmao.
It’s hard to bat in that pitch and Kohli stood his crease. Doesn’t matter the achievements and milestones, the innings was built around him. Some a holes can say that it’s slow or selfish blah blah, just illiterate.
And the next thing is, india has won half of the match the moment we scored 250+. All the commentators kept saying that. And when the first 3-4 wickets were taken by the pacers, we won the remaining match. And then Jadeja came and took 5 wickets. Sure there are some big fish in those 5 wickets and sure his aggressive batting made india score 300+. But you don’t understand the anchor of the innings, it’s Kohli. Thus the man of the match!
He is the best after Kapil Dev.
As they say in India "garda ura dia"
Even Star Sports hasn't managed to present this kind of analysis😅
I am a data scientist by profession.. Jarod does a better job😂
Huh? De Kock was long gone by the time Jadeja came in to bowl.😢 2:10
Manjrekar was neither a match winner nor a good coach. He simply talks as if Mumbai is centre of universe.
So ridiculous an observation. Sanjay Manjekar was severely criticised by us all for his unwarranted remark. Jadeja can be retained only for his fielding. His innings with Kohli against SA was gem.
SLA on SLA crime. My new favorite cricket terminology lol @Jarrod Kimber
Real cricket analyst .
Keep your facts straight JK. QDK was long gone when Jaddu came on to bowl.
some of the comments are pretty cricket ignorant. Kohli's 100 was a hard fought innings. this video by the australian Kimber is pretty woeful!
u can't underestimate Sir J
If India don't win the wc, it would be anticlimactic
Yes he is a bits and pieces player
And he is the best filder
i love your videos.. hope you get popular soon😊
We cannot live a day without mocking our dear monkey - Manjrekar!
Hardik loss is massive because he does bring match up conundrum for opposition teams. With hardick india can drop SKY. He is useless in ODI anyways
India Rocks
Richer the bcci becomes, more famous the Indian players becomes
86K views. But only 8 likes😢
So India have Jadeja as their all rounder. England have Stokes 😢
Who are you? Amazing episode
❤❤ man I am obsessed with your videos ❤😊
De cock wasn't batting when Jadeja came on to bowl ..
Waiting for final match ❤❤
If hardik was still there , we would have been very much assured of winning the world cup , Surya is an unreliable batter
finally some says it. He Mr.T20 but in ODI he is Big Zero.
Did he told lord to shardul thakur ? 😂
I mean he is popular as lord in other country too.😅
Those 6 minutes were too short. You should have kept going.
We need leave Manjrekar alone now, he has listened enough 😅
Manjrekar is a joker of the century! If not for him being a part of Mumbai team he would not have made it to a gully cricket team.
SANJAY MANJREKAR was a very very useless, batter in his playing days for INDIA .
The guy who made almost zero contribution to Indian one day cricket, who's career spanned 5 years tops, but has a loud mouth...
Bits and pieces player!! Should be listed in commentary 101, "how not to make yourself look stupid for a lifetime"
Jadeja won us the match. The runs he scored psychologically put south africa under a lot of pressure and wickets he got? Well you know it. Kohli played a slow innings yesterday on purpose. On the other hand shreyas knew we needed runs for a big score and got the guns running , so did KL (WHO IS CALCULATED PLAYER). And you are still gonna tell me Kohli got the man of the match
Slow innings was needed to be played. Making a hundred in a bowlers pitch is difficult. Shreyas and Kohli have pretty much the same strike rate. Facting 100 bowls is a lot more difficult than facing 80 bowls. Of course he crushed it.
On purpose? Tf?
It was a rank turner and it is a miracle that we got 300+ on that deck. It wouldn’t be possible if not for Kohli and Shreyas built that partnership with Kohli playing sLoW innings. Even ponting said 260 was a good score on that deck. If anything, it was 50-50 for potm. Stop blindly hating for no reason
@@vaibhavvb9898 The only reason we got to 300 was because Rohit gave them that start . Because of it Kohli and Shreyas had no scoreboard pressure and could bat deep , otherwise they would've gotten out early trying to hit shots against Maharaj.
@@siddhantkamra7779 can you give the part of my comment denying that? I was just replying to the comment saying Kohli was playing slow on purpose.
King kohli❤
MANJREKAR, Never WON any matches for INDIA or Never contributed in any WINS for INDIA..
Third nipple 😂
OZ completing their fairytale in 2023 by beating the teams which defeated them at the start of the tournament would be poetic too.
OZ started the tournament losing to India and South Africa and ending the tournament by defeating South Africa in the Semi final and India in the final
Classen out is rigged
Hi
😂😂😂😂😂😂 L
I think India will lose semifinal. Too much expectations, extremely weak lower middle order. Too long of a tail.
My prediction is that in semi or final India will be asked to chase. For once if their opponents can put a decent score batting first and can take the wickets of Kohli and Rohit cheaply, the rest of batting will crumble. No.6 SKY averages 25. Nos. 8-11 are proper tailenders, complete mugs with the bat. Even if it is just 20 runs to get, if India is 6 down they will lose.
Weak middle orders 😅lol
I mean England has a pretty deep batting order and look how they're faring.
Zero game knowledge, kudrat ka nizam rider rather than game analysis 😂
I also thought about the same and it can be a possibility and worst nightmare for ICT and fans. The problem with the scenario is that it would be a little hard against this bowling lineup to set a high target even if an Indian bowler can have a bad day. Such is the form of Indian bowlers that they can cover up for the bad day of a bowler. And if it is sub 300 chase which i think is most likely given only Afghanistan, Newzealand and Bangladesh have made 250+ against them, Indian lineup at least now have the depth to chase sub 300 target even without rohit and kohli.
Seriously what a joke you are, so you mean to say Gill and Rahul are useless? And you still doubting the Indian pace trio and spinners?
I am not saying India will def. Win the cup but your comment is absolutely rubbish. Knockouts will be tough and nothing garunteed but keep hope don't be a pessimist.
For all Country fans look at Indian fans crying over Player of the match shamelessly and accusing its because of name ,occasion power ,bias etc etc
Typical Indian crying for nothing 😂😂
That was a perfect bowling pitch were 230 was enough
So Jadeja and Sky cameos came when the team score was already above par score
And for bowling if Kuldeep was bought in place of Jadeja he would have good 5 wickets
People watched live knows the value of that 100
Maharaj was Bowling so well that he could have easily got 5 Fer and India bowled out for 220 230
That's were Iyer and Kohli gets credit
Even Shamsi legside ball was spinning
On this extremely hard Bowling pitch a batsman got Man Of match .rightly so
Rather than looking at all these X Y Z we can make it due to name Kohli occasion birthday etc etc etc
Typicall Indian fans frustrated by any star player achievement or in Form
typical ungrateful fks that sks their star player till they have nothing left, giving your star player god status. only kohli played will lol. rohit blasted 40 of 24balls, surya did 22 of 14 AND JADEJA DID 29 from 15 with a strike rate of 14. not only that he took 5 wicket and picked 2 catches. if this insnt mom worthy then what is
while your daddy scored hundred with 80 STRIKE RATE jadeja had 194 and came not out , too much for batting pitch lol
@PrinceLobo-es8kl typical uncultured Indian showing true character here 😂😂
Anyone would have got 5 Fer third rate local on that pitch
Even Kuldeep if he Bowled before
The season why Maharaj didn't have 5 is Iyer and Kohli playing him out
Must be some Ipl noob from those poison franchise frustrated as usual by Non Team player getting Player of the match
@@PrinceLobo-es8kl
Jadeja and Surya can come when they have nothing to lose..to slog😂
If it was easy why South Africa scored at less run rate than Kohli
Entire team 83(163).. and 🫏 s believe 100(120) on this pitch is selfish
Following your same logic whole South Africa team was slow😂😂😂😂
Who need these Facebook keyboard Ipl strike rate pans approval
Cry more