I was searching over the net about differences between GMs styles (which I didn't figured out until now), specialy Kasparov and Fischer. Kasparov's games are so deep and complex... I can't understand 20% of his middle-game moves without a very good explanation. Fischer's style is really much more natural, and analysing his games I would have played about 80% equal (and I'm faaaaaaar from a master). Forgive my bad english ;-b
Not a grand cheapo my friend, he actually knew what was going to happen 9 moves ahead for him to find out what would go wrong and change 5 other moves in there making it a total of 13 moves in order for him to land the mate. Chess at it's best.
Kasparov is one of the few people who changed the world of chess. His calculations are so deep and accurate that on my regular computer even Houdini takes his sweet time to find his incredible ideas. And his games are always interesting. It's not only insanely accurate, but incredibly complicated, always making his opponent solve multiple difficult issues, able to highlight and pinpoint even the most hidden weaknesses in the opponent's position. Well of course, here the dark square weakness was pretty obvious but the plan itself still had to be executed with precision and due cautiousness because of white's counterplay. And Kasparov not only found a great way to seize on the weakness of the dark squares, but simultanously stop white's counterplay. A true genius.
Thanks - we have quite a few more videos from this grand prix series out for free on youtube (and also the complete DVDs in our online shop) - so there is much more!
AT 5:24 the "Rook in the corner" is NOT "lost". He can block with Bb2 and after black takes white can bring his R to d1. Still not good but the Rook is retained.
Don't think I've commented on any of your videos before though I'm a subscriber. This is a great look at a bunch of really interesting games--and how great players take initiative. Well commented too.
the variation at 5:55 is the best one for Anand, he could castle with an open f file. Actually Stockfish has given this variation a little advantage for White (+0.62)
Yes, I like Kasparov not because he wins, but the way he wins. The quality of his moves are so good, so far beyond of what I would do!! It's like having Alekhine reborn among us!!
Instead of Nb3 in the Kasparov game @ 10:20 is Qe3 a better alternative? It gains a tempo on the c pawn, cos after black get's the grip on the h6-c1 diagonal it's an all together different story... It gives black all the time he want's to mount a king-side attack..
I would love to be able to buy a set of those pieces shown in the video that the masters are using. I have looked everywhere. Kasparov has a cheaper looking version of this chess set but the one I want is the exact replica of the pieces shown at 1:29. Anyone know where I might be able to buy this set? Thank you!
When I or other people your subscribed to comment, like or share the article, youtube now reports the action and the video in your "subscription" list unless you have "show uploads only" selected.
we´ve really diversified our channel in the last few months. we have a lot of analysis videos by NM Will Stewart and GM Ron Henley. we also offer a good deal of free previews from every video in our online store (15-25% of every DVD!). we even throw up a good deal of live blitz and bughouse videos. Cheers, Will
interesting idea - i guess black could just sacrifice the pawn anyway with Bh6 and gain time as white would take the c5-pawn with his queen which would be exposed there. Cheers, Will
there's a mistake i guess... when black pone takes white pone at g3 at 11.50 then black makes another move without white making one.... after black captures the pone at g3 at 11.50 white moves pone from f3 to f4 and then there is just check right?
i find alot of chess games analysis to be purposefully difficult to understand. This however was clear as day and demonstrates the narrators outstanding knowledge of the game. thanks muchly!
@Jrosario @maxsagibgareev @gammyhorse @PouyaaP @end1dream @Nola213 @pbezunartea @ouida soufiane @ETBrood Thanks for commenting and enjoying the video! We'll have more of 2 more preview vids of the Intel Grand Prix coming soon, including Ivanchuk's famous "missing mate in one" and rare footage of the NYC World Trade Center Kasparov Anand battle :-)
On 03:55 instead of Nd5 how about Bc4 to later Bb3 land on b3 defending 2 powns a2 and c2 also if black Knight captures white knight on Nxc3 and bxc3 then c3 pown defends b4 and d4 and B on c4 defends strategic b5 and d5 b3 and more! Bobby Fischer was in favor of Bc4 and then Bb3. Please comment.
thanks for your reply. :) I should have been more specific in my inquiry; I am referring to the "German Knight" version of the Staunton Design. I have bought pieces from House of Staunton and other places and have had a good experience but still haven't found the design that I truely want. By the way, keep up the great work on these videos! I love them!!
In Kasparov's game, following the early Ng3 line, after white played h3, if black just played bxh3 then he is winning. There would be no reason for black to play Bf4 first. In fact, white would never have played h3, he would have just played d7 first.
Clip 12:51 if he gets Queen with pawn. Kasporav checks with Rook to H3 and what ever he does he loses because of the protection on pawn plus the Bishop of black.
4:16, why didnt he play 1.c3?? then queen either retreats or 2.Nxc3 , 3.bxc3, 4.Qxc3+, 5.Bd2 , now if queen tries to take the rook we can take the queen with ours. Can anyone help out why ananth didnt do that pls? I think I'm missing something
damn that was dumb, I need to keep my eyes more open. Thank you Will for the reply, and especially for being a quick reply. I got to know about your channel from chesswebsite and now Im a big fan, already subbed.
Thank you for your reply, donactuary. :) I had already looked over Jaques of London chess sets. I agree that they are quite expensive as you pointed out. I would be willing to pay the price; but they do not have the pieces I want either. It is almost like the pieces are legend and don't exist! I,m still looking... :)
well thanks for subscribing, watching, and commenting! i´d be glad to send you a 50% off coupon for all digital items in our online shop - just send me a personal message and i will get back to you with your coupon code. Cheers, Will
Some very complex analysis and deep trap lines to fall into. Usually in my own games I have the overall idea of how to achieve checkmate like Kasparov had but miss the immediate flaws in my combinations in finishing it off and often end up just falling short and losing as a result.
Whoa whao, at 11:50 Kasparov does 2 consecutive moves: You say "pawn takes knight, pawn takes pawn, and then bishop moves and that's checkmate" - the last 2 moves were Kasparov (black) - White could actually save his king by moving his rook up one space to f2, am I wrong?
+iChess.net But Black did make two consecutive moves, right? If you pause it right at 11:51, right after black takes white pawn at g3 (but before his bishop move), I think white could move his pawn up to f4, which would block Black's bishop. And if Black queen wants to get in there like you said, White rook could take her out. No?
It's mostly to demonstrate the line of attack. White cannot do anything to stop the inevitable checkmate so the move is ignored for the sake of clarity. After 1. Rf2, it's a mate in 2 with 1... Bf4+. 2. Kg1 Qxf2#. There are other possibilities, although there's no real reason to drag it out unless you miss 1... Bf4+. 1... Qxf2. 2. Ng1 Be3+. 3. Nh3 Bxh3. 4. gxh3 Rxh3# (any other move by White will just result in the Bishop on h3 moving anywhere and discovering a checkmate) 1... gxf2. 2. Ng1 Be3+. (If 2. Ng3, then 2... Be3+ 3. Nh5 Rxh5#. Any other move, such as 2. Kh2, will be followed by 2... Bf4# (or 2... Bxf4# in the case of 2. f4)) 3. Nh3 Bxh3. 4. gxh3 Rxh3#, similar to the above. For a more sadistic one (albeit a mate in 5): 1... Be3+?!. 2. Kg1 gxf2+. 3. Kf1 Rh1+. 4. Ng1 fxg1=Q+. 5 Ke2 Qf2# (Note that 2... Bxf2+? allows the white King to escape) The other suggested responses for White instead of 1. Rf2: 1. Nxg3 Be3+. 2. Nh5 Rxh5# 1. f4 Bxf4#.
Kasparov may have defeated Vishwanathan Anand but he aint met a player like me.This promises to be a sloberknocer and I am up for it. Heavy breakfast let it sink in and then play a wonderful game of chess with Garry.
If I beat him it promises to be a proud moment for the country of India. I don't understand the meaning of the word loss or defeat because that's not what I am known by. WIN WIN WIN . UP UP AND UP.call me the eternal optimist call me whatever you want; I have played Kasparov and beat him including Vishwanathan Anand.Go by the nickname of Nirugolywompus 222 on chess.com.A happy hunting place for all head honchos. Since now everything is available online; I have a reinforcement plan of playing on an actual man made plastic and wooden chess board to prove that without the internet or with the Internet; I am still the best from that era or this era.
I was searching over the net about differences between GMs styles (which I didn't figured out until now), specialy Kasparov and Fischer.
Kasparov's games are so deep and complex... I can't understand 20% of his middle-game moves without a very good explanation.
Fischer's style is really much more natural, and analysing his games I would have played about 80% equal (and I'm faaaaaaar from a master).
Forgive my bad english ;-b
Not a grand cheapo my friend, he actually knew what was going to happen 9 moves ahead for him to find out what would go wrong and change 5 other moves in there making it a total of 13 moves in order for him to land the mate. Chess at it's best.
Anand's astonishing decimation gave me hope! Even a Super GM can fall for such tactics in the Sicilian :)
thanks - we´ve been working hard on remastering these DVDs
Kasparov is one of the few people who changed the world of chess. His calculations are so deep and accurate that on my regular computer even Houdini takes his sweet time to find his incredible ideas.
And his games are always interesting. It's not only insanely accurate, but incredibly complicated, always making his opponent solve multiple difficult issues, able to highlight and pinpoint even the most hidden weaknesses in the opponent's position. Well of course, here the dark square weakness was pretty obvious but the plan itself still had to be executed with precision and due cautiousness because of white's counterplay. And Kasparov not only found a great way to seize on the weakness of the dark squares, but simultanously stop white's counterplay. A true genius.
フィッシャー00769 Yes, true! Kasparov is one of the greatest chess players in history.
Few people? Lol, steintz, greco, la bourdais, anderssen, Paulsen, morphy, staunton, tal fischer, on and on and on and on!
@@HenryMcCraken4 what ?? Kasparov is the greatest of them all
Thanks - we have quite a few more videos from this grand prix series out for free on youtube (and also the complete DVDs in our online shop) - so there is much more!
AT 5:24 the "Rook in the corner" is NOT "lost". He can block with Bb2 and after black takes white can bring his R to d1. Still not good but the Rook is retained.
Don't think I've commented on any of your videos before though I'm a subscriber. This is a great look at a bunch of really interesting games--and how great players take initiative. Well commented too.
11:28 I would have never figured out that attack even if I was to think for 40 years. İncredible!
none would .
only the greatest player of all time
the variation at 5:55 is the best one for Anand, he could castle with an open f file. Actually Stockfish has given this variation a little advantage for White (+0.62)
5:09 I see it this very strong movr
Yes, I like Kasparov not because he wins, but the way he wins. The quality of his moves are so good, so far beyond of what I would do!! It's like having Alekhine reborn among us!!
Edward Alexander Crowley Yes, he is one of the best chess players in history..., if not the best.
Wonder if he played drunk like alekhine too lmao
fischer
@Nathyn Fangsly do you have evidence ?
agreed - i really liked this format in the 1990s - much more exciting!
Instead of Nb3 in the Kasparov game @ 10:20 is Qe3 a better alternative? It gains a tempo on the c pawn, cos after black get's the grip on the h6-c1 diagonal it's an all together different story... It gives black all the time he want's to mount a king-side attack..
Thanks for watching
I would love to be able to buy a set of those pieces shown in the video that the masters are using. I have looked everywhere. Kasparov has a cheaper looking version of this chess set but the one I want is the exact replica of the pieces shown at 1:29. Anyone know where I might be able to buy this set? Thank you!
When I or other people your subscribed to comment, like or share the article, youtube now reports the action and the video in your "subscription" list unless you have "show uploads only" selected.
This is why I love faster game tournaments. It really challenges the mind when time is an enemy or friend.
we´ve really diversified our channel in the last few months. we have a lot of analysis videos by NM Will Stewart and GM Ron Henley. we also offer a good deal of free previews from every video in our online store (15-25% of every DVD!). we even throw up a good deal of live blitz and bughouse videos. Cheers, Will
Are all your videos like this one or the other one!? I must subscribe now. Excellent video Mr OnlineChessLessons.
Thanks for watching!
interesting idea - i guess black could just sacrifice the pawn anyway with Bh6 and gain time as white would take the c5-pawn with his queen which would be exposed there. Cheers, Will
there's a mistake i guess...
when black pone takes white pone at g3 at 11.50 then black makes another move without white making one....
after black captures the pone at g3 at 11.50 white moves pone from f3 to f4 and then there is just check right?
i find alot of chess games analysis to be purposefully difficult to understand. This however was clear as day and demonstrates the narrators outstanding knowledge of the game. thanks muchly!
@Jrosario @maxsagibgareev @gammyhorse @PouyaaP @end1dream @Nola213 @pbezunartea @ouida soufiane @ETBrood Thanks for commenting and enjoying the video! We'll have more of 2 more preview vids of the Intel Grand Prix coming soon, including Ivanchuk's famous "missing mate in one" and rare footage of the NYC World Trade Center Kasparov Anand battle :-)
at smirin's move in the begaining why chuky's clock is running???
On 03:55 instead of Nd5 how about Bc4 to later Bb3 land on b3 defending 2 powns a2 and c2 also if black Knight captures white knight on Nxc3 and bxc3 then c3 pown defends b4 and d4 and B on c4 defends strategic b5 and d5 b3 and more! Bobby Fischer was in favor of Bc4 and then Bb3. Please comment.
Aren't forced moves preventable if thought deeply? especially those that are result mistake and are disadvantages? i am talking about after 5:00
on 05:00 instead of Bishop to g2 isn't it a good idea to Qe4 offering queen exchange?
Fifi Lili then Knight to b4 then to c2, winning a pawn
Anand should have used the Fried Liver Attack. It works against all my opponents, and they are rated 900 or so.
Are you really suggesting he uses something because it works vs people rated 900? LOL
Max Payne Dude, it was obviously humor. Although the way Nakamura is playing lately, he might take it seriously.
Locutus D'Borg K :D
worked pretty well for bobby fischer too
Max Payne not to mention that stupid ass slang name for it. Stupid noobs
thanks for your reply. :) I should have been more specific in my inquiry; I am referring to the "German Knight" version of the Staunton Design. I have bought pieces from House of Staunton and other places and have had a good experience but still haven't found the design that I truely want. By the way, keep up the great work on these videos! I love them!!
great vid, anyone know what kind of chess set/pieces they used in this tournament?
In Kasparov's game, following the early Ng3 line, after white played h3, if black just played bxh3 then he is winning. There would be no reason for black to play Bf4 first. In fact, white would never have played h3, he would have just played d7 first.
Clip 12:51 if he gets Queen with pawn. Kasporav checks with Rook to H3 and what ever he does he loses because of the protection on pawn plus the Bishop of black.
I'm not sure if I understood your question. If black takes on h3, gxh3 and Qxh3 is not possible due to Qxh3 for white.
If c3 then black plays Qxe4 and wins a lot of material. Cheers, Will
Iwantschuk is a special individual.
+Dagobert Duck Yes, he has a special personality
Dagobert Duck անոթային հիվանդություն կարմիր քամի բուժումը
Thanks Dave!
No problem. If you'd like the whole 7 hour video shoot me a message and I'll shoot you a 35% off coupon. Thanks for joining the community :-)
4:16, why didnt he play 1.c3?? then queen either retreats or 2.Nxc3 , 3.bxc3, 4.Qxc3+, 5.Bd2 , now if queen tries to take the rook we can take the queen with ours. Can anyone help out why ananth didnt do that pls? I think I'm missing something
Very interesting and instructive! Thank you very much!
Have you tried checking The London Chess Centre? They have some really good sets there...
With this video I am seeing greatly improved production values. Much more enjoyable, and projects a professional quality that befits GM King.
I have that little begginer chess book daniel king made.
Brilliant commentary and great game. Loved it.
great commentary
Thanks Daniel
thanks
Thanks!
Very nice! Thank you!!
Great video. Thanks a lot.
is this... yes it is... who else could it be... this is...
DANIEL KING
(the king of chess commentating)
i learned so much by watching.....thank you....god , these guys are good.....masters
no worries kevin that kind of thing happens to the best of us
biggest crusher ever
Thank you Averagebum2! I will take a look again. I have been in their site before but maybe I missed them. :)
thank you good commentary
I think Nc4 would run into ...Qe4+ Qe2 Qxh1 - winning white´s rook
We need this kind of tournaments now
so good ;)
the King of all gms !
mcpartridgeboy indeed! Maybe, the best player in history!
no the best player in history is Mikhail tal. Atleast for me :)
Thanks a lot...!..great job...
Commendable...
nice video, thanks for sharing!
Thanks! We are actually running a Summer Sale right now, offering 30% OFF all our DVDS with coupon code youtube30 at onlinechesslessonsDOTnet
Excellent . Kasparov is a real legend . Eventhough I prefer Bobby Fischer 1970-1972
Nothing beats Kasparov and his legendary accent.. "BEESHUP!"
great commentary Man you're natural born commentator
Thanks!
not sure, i hear staunton chess makes high quality pieces
Hi. I really enjoyed the game. I would like to see more games from our current champion Anand if possible.
that first Anand's game looks just like my every blitz game lol.
damn that was dumb, I need to keep my eyes more open. Thank you Will for the reply, and especially for being a quick reply. I got to know about your channel from chesswebsite and now Im a big fan, already subbed.
hey man cheapos are a legitimate part of the game - even at higher levels
Thank you for your reply, donactuary. :) I had already looked over Jaques of London chess sets. I agree that they are quite expensive as you pointed out. I would be willing to pay the price; but they do not have the pieces I want either. It is almost like the pieces are legend and don't exist! I,m still looking... :)
waw, what a chess brain this kasparov has :) Brilliant last game..
well thanks for subscribing, watching, and commenting! i´d be glad to send you a 50% off coupon for all digital items in our online shop - just send me a personal message and i will get back to you with your coupon code. Cheers, Will
Some very complex analysis and deep trap lines to fall into. Usually in my own games I have the overall idea of how to achieve checkmate like Kasparov had but miss the immediate flaws in my combinations in finishing it off and often end up just falling short and losing as a result.
great video
And a say it again. Garry Kasparov would be a more sustainable choice than Vladimir Putin.
kahlschlag17 Yes, maybe. you're right, but we won't ever know
Whoa whao, at 11:50 Kasparov does 2 consecutive moves: You say "pawn takes knight, pawn takes pawn, and then bishop moves and that's checkmate" - the last 2 moves were Kasparov (black) - White could actually save his king by moving his rook up one space to f2, am I wrong?
+VicInNocal After Rf2 black can move Qxf2 threatening chechmate.
+iChess.net But Black did make two consecutive moves, right? If you pause it right at 11:51, right after black takes white pawn at g3 (but before his bishop move), I think white could move his pawn up to f4, which would block Black's bishop. And if Black queen wants to get in there like you said, White rook could take her out. No?
It's mostly to demonstrate the line of attack. White cannot do anything to stop the inevitable checkmate so the move is ignored for the sake of clarity.
After 1. Rf2, it's a mate in 2 with 1... Bf4+. 2. Kg1 Qxf2#.
There are other possibilities, although there's no real reason to drag it out unless you miss 1... Bf4+.
1... Qxf2. 2. Ng1 Be3+. 3. Nh3 Bxh3. 4. gxh3 Rxh3# (any other move by White will just result in the Bishop on h3 moving anywhere and discovering a checkmate)
1... gxf2. 2. Ng1 Be3+. (If 2. Ng3, then 2... Be3+ 3. Nh5 Rxh5#. Any other move, such as 2. Kh2, will be followed by 2... Bf4# (or 2... Bxf4# in the case of 2. f4)) 3. Nh3 Bxh3. 4. gxh3 Rxh3#, similar to the above.
For a more sadistic one (albeit a mate in 5):
1... Be3+?!. 2. Kg1 gxf2+. 3. Kf1 Rh1+. 4. Ng1 fxg1=Q+. 5 Ke2 Qf2# (Note that 2... Bxf2+? allows the white King to escape)
The other suggested responses for White instead of 1. Rf2:
1. Nxg3 Be3+. 2. Nh5 Rxh5#
1. f4 Bxf4#.
Kasparov may have defeated Vishwanathan Anand but he aint met a player like me.This promises to be a sloberknocer and I am up for it. Heavy breakfast let it sink in and then play a wonderful game of chess with Garry.
Kramnik really looked like a hippie at the time.
thanks!!
Only in chess can poetry also be so brutal!
unstoppable!
Oh hi, me. Yes, it says at the end of the video that it is Daniel King.
I love this vid! Subscribing.
perfect video!)
great stuff.
You are an amazing person!
Anand Deserves Bharat Ratna. Highest civilian Award. Coz he represented India on No.1 in chess. By becoming World Champion.
Definitely! 🤓
Kasparov wheezing at his own jokes into the mic is so embarrassing
splendid commentatory. simple and lean ,p
i love kasparov.......
Great moves
Lawrence Lepes thanks!
You're welcome
OnlineChessLessons.NET why are you thanking him? Do you think you're Garry Kasparov or something? ;)
thanks for your offer but I am not interrested in! Keep on with your good work! kind regards from Germany
This guy sounds like Daniel King. Is it so?
neither are You ;)
damn, nice hair vlad!
this game effectively destroyed anand's career.
If I beat him it promises to be a proud moment for the country of India. I don't understand the meaning of the word loss or defeat because that's not what I am known by. WIN WIN WIN . UP UP AND UP.call me the eternal optimist call me whatever you want; I have played Kasparov and beat him including Vishwanathan Anand.Go by the nickname of Nirugolywompus 222 on chess.com.A happy hunting place for all head honchos. Since now everything is available online; I have a reinforcement plan of playing on an actual man made plastic and wooden chess board to prove that without the internet or with the Internet; I am still the best from that era or this era.
Man, Kramnik looked a little pudgy in this video.
Awesome
What was Polgar doing there? She isn't good enough to win the male tournaments.