I honestly think this is the best negative review I’ve heard of this book. You bring up many valid points and critiques and connect them to yourself as a reader. I also liked how you structured your review so it didn’t feel like a rant. You mixed in little compliments into your negative remarks or pointed out how different readers might actually like those parts. That’s what makes a great reviewer. Even a negative review should make you feel inspired to read. Not just feed into the frustration you might feel from not liking a certain book. (I feel like most negative reviews are structured this way. To give people with the same option a place to be negative) Even though I totally love this series, I will still follow you and see what you have to say on other works. You’re such an eloquent person! I don’t know if it’s the best idea for you to continue the series. Some of your critiques will bleed into the other books. I do think though that the thinks you liked about The final Empire will get explored more in book 2 and 3. If you someday decide to finish this series I will be very interested to hear your thoughts!
My apologies for the late reply but I have been away and haven't had much time to respond to comments. Thank you very much for the great compliment you paid me, particularly as you love the series. I agree that a review should include both the good and bad, though sometimes it can be difficult to find any good in some books. Having had more time to think on it, I will not be continuing with the Mistborn series but do intend to try other books by Sanderson. Though I don't rule it out forever. Again thank you for the kind words.
I need to make a correction. In the video I state that The Final Empire was Sanderson's first novel and that Elantris was a novella. I thought I had read it somewhere, but I'm wrong on both counts. Elantris is Sanderson's first novel.
That is an unpopular opinion! 😄 I've not read Mistborn but I've read the first two books in Stormlight Archive (SA), his supposed magnum opus, and I largely agree with your criticisms about the writing. He tends to keep repeating things (I can't recall a writer who is this anxious that his readers will forget things!) and he explicitly states things too much imo (barely any subtlety). Sanderson's main feature is hard magic systems and unfortunately it's not something I care about to the excruciating level he tends to go into. The other thing is his dialogue between younger characters tends to be very cringey imo and the 'humour' feels very flat. His story and plotting is usually on point, agreed. But everything else is why I stopped 2 books into the Stormlight Archive. Your review was very fair. My thoughts are this may not be the author for you. Though the characters in Way of Kings are much better fleshed out so that might be worth a shot. But it's five 1200+ page books (for the first arc, the 5th novel is due in 2024, its going to be 10 overall) and the first doesn’t work as a standalone - so something to consider if committing to long series is a factor and you don't like to quit series. I hope this helps a little. Happy reading!🙂
Hi Paromita! And I know it isn't popular, but we can't all like the same things. Before I make up my mind about Sanderson, I want to read at least one or two more, but think I will try Stormlight Archive next rather than Mistborn. I love long series so that's a draw for me, and hopefully I will enjoy SA. Thank you very much for sharing.
@@NerdyKathi Very true. The Way of Kings has many compelling characters (and more internal monologue which is well-done), lots of epic moments and doesn't feel YA at all so hopefully you will like it a lot more! 😊
I read the Mistborn Trilogy. I liked how the 2nd book tells the story many ignore; what happens after you defeat the big bad. The chaos and power vacuums that form it it's wake. As the Trilogy was written together, it as a whole effectively has the same strengths and flaws as the 1st book with subjective preferences in story and plot. But it also has a very tightly written plot thanks to that as well. I do think the Trilogy works better being read all together, but as it was published in 3 separate books each must also stand on its own. When compared to The Way of Kings though, that "simple" prose still remains. However it is definitely more subtle than Mistborn and it definitely was written for a more patient and media-literate audience in mind.
Naturally a series should work better as a whole but if the first part of a book or series doesn't hold my interest, I will have no inclination to finish it. I'm going to read Way of Kings most likely later in the year. It might appeal to me more.
I am so aligned with your thoughts on this book! It wasn’t the worst YA-leaning book I’ve read but it was far from good with how simplistic the writing and characters were. Vin in particular felt hollow. She allegedly grew up in a very difficult, political setting and has trauma from that upbringing but conveniently forgets facts about how skaa are treated in multiple conversations with multiple other characters. Her naivety didn’t feel like a character trait so much as a disingenuous need for certain conversational reveals to happen for the reader. Also, Vin being practically the only female character in this book, outside a few previously fridged women who existed only to elevate men’s tragic backstories and an evil noblewoman, was intolerable. This doesn’t even touch the amount of needless misogyny heaped into the world building. In any case, I’m really glad I found this review from you! Clearly I have a lot of big opinions on this book and it was very refreshing listening to someone who also is critical about it. Cheers to you!
I have to agree with you on Vin, though to be fair she was very young and the young can be oblivious to what doesn't affect them directly. However, I am going to disagree with you on there being misogyny in the world building. Were women treated poorly? Yes but that doesn't equate to misogyny for me. It was also very common for older fantasy not to include as many female characters though we cant ignore the fact that a major character in this book is female. Thank you for sharing your views, I very much enjoy discussing books with others.
@@NerdyKathi re: the misogyny: It’s more than Vin being one of incredibly few women in the entire 500+ book. It’s also the world building leaning hard on the oppression of women without interrogating it deeply. We’re told most skaa women are whores owned by “whoremasters,” one of the key dramatic elements between Vin and Elend is that noblemen sexual abuse skaa women, and the needless world building of “all men are required to attend public executions.” The sum of all of it, to me, says that this author is only using women as dressing and always deeply buried in the background under really harmful circumstances.
Wow, this is the first review I really agree with start to finish. Thank you! I've struggled with understanding why people enjoy reading Sanderson so much, and what I've come up with is that he's what I call a "gateway author", an author people read when they are first getting into reading. I read a gateway author myself, Louis L'Amour was mine. Not a great author, but wrote fun books that were simple for a beginning reader. This is how I view Sanderson. Should you read more Sanderson? Probably not. He does improve in the Stormlight Archive series, but all the issues you highlight are still there. With so many great authors out there there is very little point to spending your time with Sanderson.
Thank you and perhaps you’ve hit the nail on the head, a “gateway” author. I might have loved the book if it was my first foray into fantasy. I have Way of Kings and will read it before I decide if he’s for me or not. I appreciate you taking the time to comment.
I just finished the first trilogy and actually really enjoyed it; that being said, I can see where a majority of your criticisms come from. Great review!
After eventually completing the series, I have come to love it. I interrupted my first readthrough of Mistborn era 1 to read Brandon's Stormlight Archive and after that, it took me forever to come back and complete Mistborn. Reading Stormlight felt like reading a more mature version of Mistborn. Not to say the story is similiar, but Sanderson's writing felt more refined in that series. I eventually completed Mistborn for the cosmere connections.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I am going to read the first book in Stormlight Archive next and if I enjoy it, then it's likely I will go back to Mistborn as well.
After reading through the first book for the second time I can definitely see where you are coming from. English is not my first language and I just recently got back into reading instead of watching tv so I somewhat appreciate the simplistic language. I suspect it would deter me from reading if the language was too complicated. Also I assume the language is as simple and straightforward as it is because the story is told mostly through Vin and she is just a 16-17 year old skaa in the first book and the language she grew up with is rather simple
I can appreciate why you liked the book. There are times I like an easy read as well, but with fantasy, I much prefer it to be more adult. Thank you very much for sharing.
Glad to find another reviewer with similar thoughts to myself. I thought I was missing something. I read the rest of the trilogy and while book 1 was passable, 2 and 3 were insufferable. If you don't like Vin and/or Elend, you probably won't like the other 2 books. I was quite miffed as he is so popular, as is this series. I was left very disappointed.
I thought I must have missed something as well, and I'm glad I haven't read the others. Nor do I intend to, though never say never. It seems there are a few people who don't like it.
Hi Kathi, I am new to your channel. I totally agreed with you that I don't care for Mistborn that much. I found Vin so annoying and the book was the big letdown for me. I almost DNF'ed halfway through it.
I got halfway through it years ago. I did not intentionally DNF it but just did not pick it back up for too long a time. I do wish to retry it soon. I did read Elantris not too long ago and enjoyed it, mostly the ending.
I definitely agree with your review! I thought that Kelsier was the most likable character but I liked Vin enough and the other characters felt like a means to end to take down the Lord Ruler. I'm tired of the modern fantasy trope of the downtrodden main character who we are supposed to like simply due to sympathy. I believe that Sanderson should have condensed this trilogy into a standalone heist fantasy book, especially to start his writing career. It's quite ambitious to write a trilogy at the start of your career and I believe a few standalone and short stories would have been wiser. I'm almost done with the 2nd book and regarding the world-building, I think Sanderson developed the world as he wrote the books. Even toward the end of book 2, we know much more about history that happened 1000 years ago than we know about the modern world and all the dominances in the empire. My Elend theory is that Sanderson wrote Elend similar to himself. He wrote this in his early 20s and my guess is that he wanted women to find these bookish & aloof traits desirable, so here comes the Vin and Elend romance. Just a theory, of course lol
I think it is natural for fantasy authors to have an epic story in mind and I believe he had written a stand alone book prior to this series. Wish fulfilment may very well have played a part in the creation of Elend’s character. I don’t think it is uncommon. Thank you for sharing your viewpoint.
Agreed, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills given how much praise this series gets. I forced myself through final empire and well of ascension and now I'm halfway through hero of ages and I don't know if I can make it. There are just no likeable characters other than Kelsier and Sazed.
@@NerdyKathi You made the right decision, it just gets worse IMO. Elend replaces Kelsier as the other main character and somehow becomes even more boring in books 2/3
Just found your channel and I agree 100% with your review, I really want it to like this series but it just didn't hit with me. P.S: I think Kelsier should have been the main character instead of Vin, such a borring character
Totally agree, and while I prefer a mean spirited review because I hate Brandon Sanderson’s work ☺️, this was so pleasant and honest, you’re an absolute gem. ❤
I’m 10 books into the wheel of time. And it’s perfect for me. I get to live in this world that Jordan created. So much depth and detail and histories yet plenty of intrigue and ambiguity. Mistborn everything was told to me through exposition. Not enough world-building and detail! I wanted to live in this city and see what everyday life is like. The cultures and economy etc. sadly I didn’t get that
I'm sorry to hear you didn't like it, but I do understand your reasoning. I actually really love this trilogy, and for a lot of the reasons you don't like it, haha. I have aphantasia (I can't form mental images), so I prefer minimal visual description. As much as I love Wheel of Time, it makes parts of those books so tedious for me. I adore Vin and they way he beats you over the head with her fear and anxiety helped me connect to her as someone who's dealt with similar feelings. But I get how that can be frustrating for others, even other people who have similar experiences to her. Sanderson's prose is definitely simple here and it does improve. I read all 3 Mistborn books in a couple of weeks, so they bleed together, but his recent stuff is considerably more refined. I don't think it's ever that impressive, but I don't think you would view it as a detriment anymore. As for whether or not you should keep going, I'm not sure. He definitely address your criticisms in the later books, but I don't know if he does it quickly enough (particularly with his writing style, the world and characters gets quickly fleshed out in the next two books). If you wanna try something more recent from him, I recommend the short story The Emperor's Soul. He wrote it while working on WoT and it's more representative of his current writitng style. I don't think you'll be blown away by the prose, but hopefully it's at least adequate.
Thank you very much for sharing. We all have different tastes and what appeals to one person, doesn't work for others. I can understand why too much description can be frustrating to some, but I do think this book had too little. I do want to try more of Sanderson's works, but think I am better off reading the first Stormlight Archive book before I decide if I will continue Mistborn.
I think I said before that I'm around your age, Kathi, and like you I am not really a fan of YA. It's not that I find it bad or anything, I'm just not that terribly interested. That being said, I loved The Final Empire...while I was reading it. It got me excited for the next two books, but even as I started the second one, the spell that The Final Empire had cast over me was fading a bit. It was like eating junkfood. So yummy and tasty while you're eating it, but afterwards, you realize that there was just not that much substance. I did read both sequels though and to be honest, I found the second one a bit of a slog, the third one a little better with a pretty satisfying ending, but neither had the fast pace or the stakes of the first one, at least not to me. I liked the whole 'heist' aspect of the first one and that was gone in the second two. Not that it would have made any sense to the story to continue that aspect of it, but it was the thing for me that set The Final Empire apart from the other two and made it enjoyable for me. I wouldn't say that I disliked the series overall, but it didn't really get me on Team Sanderson or pumped and excited about reading The Stormlight Archive. Maybe someday.
Hi Spliff. 😊 Interesting isn't it, how sometimes we love a book while reading it, and then on reflection don't like it as much. Junk food is an excellent analogy! The heist part was good, but knowing what happens to one character (not naming them to avoid spoilers) and that another character is going to feature even more in the books is yet another reason I don't have any interest in continuing. Thank you very much for sharing!
I love your reviews Kathi and I appreciate this review as I've been wondering whether to start the Mistborn series because I read one book by Sanderson that I liked and one I DFN'd but I agree about his YA writing style so I suspect he just isn't for me. A few corrections: Mistborn was not Sanderson's first book; Elantris was his first published book. Also, Elantris is decidedly not a novella with its 622 page count. I don't mean to be a jerk by pointing these things out to you but these were easy to find facts and I strongly feel especially reviewers should get facts about authors and their work right. It's only fair right?
Thank you for the correction Daniil. I agree we should try to be as accurate as possible and I thought I had read somewhere that Elantris was a novella and that Final Empire was his first novel. My mistake obviously.
Thank you so much for this very articulate review. I agree with you 100%. It simply felt too "YA" to me and it hindered my enjoyment a lot. The magic system and the world itself is interesting enough to at least keep me going but I do not understand the hype for this series. Before this I read Elantris and I don't remember it feeling so Young Adult, so hopefully the Mistborn series is an exception. I really want to explore the Cosmere but so far both books disappointed me in certain regards. However, I loved the first 2 thirds of Elantris. Only the ending lowered the score I gave it. If felt rushed and unfinished. It packed polish. Have you read Elantris?
I would like to hear your thoughts on other books if you would like to read them sometime in the future ) Characters get more fleshed out due to having more time to talk with one another and stuff, revealing some of their past. For me not knowing much about the world and the characters seemed natural, as Vin wouldn't know that and wasn't interested in paying much attention to the others besides whatever was necessary. I usually like to try to sink into the headspace of the character I follow, and following Vin was a bit annoying throughout the series as she isn't nearly as interested in other characters as I was, but it also was easy for me to follow her. I am a younger reader and was a teen at the time of reading The Final Empire and of course flashy and inventive ways to use simple yet in some ways intricate magic was a big hook for me, albeit more interesting uses come in the two later books. Still, nothing as amazingly big and exciting as Kelsier's storm of metal objects, but some things felt pretty smart. I also read The Wheel of Time, and despite feeling like the writing was overly flowery at first I instantly fell in love with often notes about characters having distinct hairdos or clothes denoting their possible nation or sometimes age. I loved the descriptiveness and in time got used to what at first felt like dense flowery-ness, and sometimes I do wish that Sanderson used a somewhat similar style at least in places, and Stormlight Archive, the series of which Way of Kings is the first book, sometimes has little things that invoke similar feeling, if still decidedly minimalistic.
At this point, I don't intend to continue the series but I will read Way of Kings soon. I can understand the magic system being a big hook for readers but I am a reader who is more drawn to characters. Whilst WOT can seem flowery, it is the descriptiveness of characters, customs and cultures that adds depth to the world. Thank you very much for sharing.
Finished the trilogy this week. Glad that’s over. It was such an effort to finish. It was definitely young adult and characters under developed. It was just so unbelievable, so far fetched. I liked the first book out of all three but still not that great. The ending wasn’t that great. Really don’t know why the hype. I expected a lot more. I just don’t get what the fuss is about. Glad I’m not alone.
Books should not be an effort to finish. I'm sorry to hear you didn't enjoy the ending and I'm surprised that there are more people than I would have thought who also don't like the series.
I am driven by character and and world building in my fantasy books and I feel like Sanderson is very weak on those two fronts. Also, for the breezy YA feel I feel like the books should be funner instead of so dour and depressing.
Same, I am drawn to characters and world building, but as I've only read one of his own books I am reserving judgment until I read another. Thank you for sharing.
I had very similar thoughts reading it, for me it felt very YA, many side characters where gimmicky and simplistic, the instalove thread was really not believeble, given Vins personality. Also in the ending it seemed everyone had a really easy way of getting into the palace which I found hilarious. On the other hand, I had no problem with Vin's character, or the world being not fleshed out more, I mean it's just the first book in a very long series, so there is time to elaborate these things.
For a large /long fantasy novel I expect a bit more world building in the first book to set the scene. As for Vin, she didn't appeal to me and as she is clearly going to feature in the other books, it's another reason why I won't be continuing with the series.
Good honest review. I kinda liked it, feeling also about the simplicity despite the magic system and good plot. Would you have any recommendations of something better wohtout bwing too complex? Inhave read Silmarillion for the 5th time recently and i would like something easier. 😂 Thanks 😊
Thank you. Hmm, it’s hard to say what would be a good recommendation. It really depends on what you like in fantasy, epic, urban, young adult etc. For classic older fantasy that is a lot of fun I would recommend David Eddings The Belgariad.
Certainly an unpopular opinion, I think you're the first person I've come across who doesn't like this book and I'm happy to have finally found someone who share's my opinion! I agree the characters are a bit superficial and really don't like how Sanderson explains and re-explains things over and over. I felt this was part of why his characters lacked depth, as he spent a lot of words reinforcing the couple of key defining traits of the main characters (such as Vin not being trusting) instead of increasing the depth of the characters. When reading this I felt that it was clear Sanderson already knew exactly where the book needed to go at each stage (a strength of his), but this resulted in him achieving the 'milestones' at the expense of actually telling a story and building the characters and worlds. I have finished the second and third books as I wanted to see where the story would end up, however I wouldn't recommend them to you as most of your criticisms apply for the next books as well.
I am surprised that you haven't seen others who don't like this book on YT, but I know we are in a minority. I agree with all you said Sam, and frankly, characters and world should not be secondary to plot. You have reaffirmed for me not to read the other books though I am still intending to read The Way of Kings.
I'm only 4 chapter in, but I'm liking the story so far. However, if I pick at it like you have, yes, the writing is simple. I think the characters are too cartoonish as well, exaggerations of what they represent. They don't feel like real people with mixed emotions and thoughts so far. Vin is the poor abused girl, and Kesler is the uppity troublemaker. He doesn't leave any subtly for us to interpret. We know Vin is abuse, because he states it and show it again and again, trying to get us to sympathize with her. Kesler's character has the same problem. He is optimistic and happy, with no complexity to his character. However, for a simple read, it's engaging. The concept around allomancy is interesting to keep me reading.
As this is a review of the book, then it’s meant to look at different aspects of it. I don’t consider that equates to picking at it which implies unwarranted criticisms. I can see why people would like the book but it isn’t to my taste.
Hi Kathi It was so nice you reviews this because I keep seeing in the bookstore and always wondered is I shout pick up a copy. Now I’m thinking I’ll see if the local library has it. I, same as you, am not a big fan of YA but if you get the chance please please read the Unwind by Neal Shusterman. It’s four books but just give the first one a go if you have the time. This is YA book that I read because my daughter recommended it when she was a teen. The plot and some parts of this book left me broken. I cried almost every time I picked it up and I re read it recently and I couldn’t stop crying again. I can’t event talk about it without getting to emotional. I would love to hear from you if you have read it or if any of your fans have. Would love to see what others think about it.
Could you recommend some fantasy books/series you enjoy? I too couldn't stand Mistborn, I'm looking to get First Law trilogy but I'm scared it's going to be another Mistborn :(
I gave a go at 4 of his books-did not finish any of them, except mistborn book 1, on a second try nonetheless. Did not like it either for pretty much all the reasons in the video. I do feel left out sometimes for not liking his writing, as if I’m missing something.
I understand exactly how you feel, but I think it all boils down to individual tastes. Also, 4 books is a very good indicator whether an author is for you. I usually try 2 before I make up my mind and I'm still intending to try Way of Kings at some point. Thank you for sharing Lila.
It took me nearly 2 years to finish this book 😂. It did not grip me at all. It was not bad but I don't get the praise it gets. I genuinely started to question the taste of people who praise this book to the moon.
I found your video after making my own videos for each of the books of the trilogy. I absolutely hated books 2 and 3. Some of the most predictable, simplistic books I’ve ever read.
I've read all of the Cosmere and on book 7 of the Wheel of Time. Sanderson and Jordan both repeat themselves frequently and there are a lot of hidden details that aren't relevant until later books. Brandon is setting up a series, not writing a stand alone novel. I know many adults in their 20's, 30's and 40's that enjoy these books. Mistborn was written as an in between age gaps and something that could be read by YA and adults. So the fact that adults and YA both enjoy the books proves he met his intended goal. I think there are a lot of details you overlooked about the book because you were put off by Brandon's simplistic writing.
Thank you for sharing your views. I agree that both Jordan and Sanderson can be repetitive but lay a lot of groundwork for future books. Obviously, this was not meant to be a stand alone book and I am aware that it is popular to a mixed range of ages but clearly, it didn't appeal to me. Or to many people I know who are of varying ages. Perhaps there are details I overlooked, but it is inaccurate to state I did not like the book based on only one of the criticisms I have of it.
I actually liked book one. However i feel the same way about Vin and Elland as well. Im done ghe trilogy now and trust me the second and third book are much worse. Elland becomes completely insufferable by the end of the trilogy. You earned a sub from me.
@@NerdyKathi Don't waste you time. I did because my OCD over having to know how it all ends forced me to and I regret it. Thanks for the great review. Have a wonderful day.
i liked the first book a lot then despised books two and three. so much so i wish i had left it as a stand-alone. i’m nervous to pick up stormlight now
For me, the first and third are the best. I like two, but not as much as the others. What changed between the first and the other two that made you despise books two and three?
@@kaladongstormguy lots of stuff but i don’t want to get into spoilers or rant about it. i think the main thing was that i recognized his ‘sanderlanche’ style, which made most of the book feel like filler to me. combine that with reading them back to back, being annoyed with repetition and re-explanation, i only enjoyed the last quarter of each book. i will say i was pretty biased going into the third book. i should have taken a break and reset to give it a fair chance. but i didn’t and by the time i hit the last quarter, especially after hearing people say the third book is a lot better than the second, i was an unhappy camper. which surprised me since i really did think the whole first book was great.
@@philip3572 Ah, I get that. I had just read WoT before getting into Mistborn, so I guess I had built up my tolerance for repetition and reexplanation, haha. But without that I can completely understand why reading them back to back would feel like a drag. I never got the filler feeling from the setup for a Sanderlanche, but some parts did kinda drag or felt unimportant now that I think back, so I see what you mean. Have you read any other Cosmere stuff or did your experience with Mistborn sour your perception on Sanderson too much? Edit: Just reread your original comment saw that you were hesitant to pick up Stormlight. Yeah, I can see why you would. You should definitely take it slow if you do. You might get a good bit of that filler feeling in the first book, but I think the Sanderlanches are much better in Stormlight. I give my tentative encouragement to try it out. I hope you like them!
Great review Kathi i thought i was alone in disliking this. The author is extremely overrated and it's hard to discuss his flaws or criticize without his fans coming after you.
I feel the exact same way. I like the stormlihht archive. But when I read this book it felt very much like a chore to read, I was excited because of how hyped it was. But I felt like it was an obligation to continue. Didn’t like any of the characters, and the world just felt paper thin.
I honestly think this is the best negative review I’ve heard of this book.
You bring up many valid points and critiques and connect them to yourself as a reader. I also liked how you structured your review so it didn’t feel like a rant. You mixed in little compliments into your negative remarks or pointed out how different readers might actually like those parts. That’s what makes a great reviewer.
Even a negative review should make you feel inspired to read. Not just feed into the frustration you might feel from not liking a certain book. (I feel like most negative reviews are structured this way. To give people with the same option a place to be negative)
Even though I totally love this series, I will still follow you and see what you have to say on other works. You’re such an eloquent person!
I don’t know if it’s the best idea for you to continue the series. Some of your critiques will bleed into the other books. I do think though that the thinks you liked about The final Empire will get explored more in book 2 and 3.
If you someday decide to finish this series I will be very interested to hear your thoughts!
My apologies for the late reply but I have been away and haven't had much time to respond to comments.
Thank you very much for the great compliment you paid me, particularly as you love the series.
I agree that a review should include both the good and bad, though sometimes it can be difficult to find any good in some books.
Having had more time to think on it, I will not be continuing with the Mistborn series but do intend to try other books by Sanderson. Though I don't rule it out forever.
Again thank you for the kind words.
I need to make a correction. In the video I state that The Final Empire was Sanderson's first novel and that Elantris was a novella. I thought I had read it somewhere, but I'm wrong on both counts. Elantris is Sanderson's first novel.
Elantris and Mistborn are his first and second published novels. They're his 6th and 14th written.
That is an unpopular opinion! 😄
I've not read Mistborn but I've read the first two books in Stormlight Archive (SA), his supposed magnum opus, and I largely agree with your criticisms about the writing.
He tends to keep repeating things (I can't recall a writer who is this anxious that his readers will forget things!) and he explicitly states things too much imo (barely any subtlety).
Sanderson's main feature is hard magic systems and unfortunately it's not something I care about to the excruciating level he tends to go into. The other thing is his dialogue between younger characters tends to be very cringey imo and the 'humour' feels very flat.
His story and plotting is usually on point, agreed. But everything else is why I stopped 2 books into the Stormlight Archive.
Your review was very fair. My thoughts are this may not be the author for you. Though the characters in Way of Kings are much better fleshed out so that might be worth a shot. But it's five 1200+ page books (for the first arc, the 5th novel is due in 2024, its going to be 10 overall) and the first doesn’t work as a standalone - so something to consider if committing to long series is a factor and you don't like to quit series.
I hope this helps a little.
Happy reading!🙂
Hi Paromita! And I know it isn't popular, but we can't all like the same things.
Before I make up my mind about Sanderson, I want to read at least one or two more, but think I will try Stormlight Archive next rather than Mistborn.
I love long series so that's a draw for me, and hopefully I will enjoy SA.
Thank you very much for sharing.
@@NerdyKathi Very true.
The Way of Kings has many compelling characters (and more internal monologue which is well-done), lots of epic moments and doesn't feel YA at all so hopefully you will like it a lot more! 😊
Terry Goodkind is the worst about this. Love him though.
I read the Mistborn Trilogy. I liked how the 2nd book tells the story many ignore; what happens after you defeat the big bad. The chaos and power vacuums that form it it's wake. As the Trilogy was written together, it as a whole effectively has the same strengths and flaws as the 1st book with subjective preferences in story and plot. But it also has a very tightly written plot thanks to that as well. I do think the Trilogy works better being read all together, but as it was published in 3 separate books each must also stand on its own.
When compared to The Way of Kings though, that "simple" prose still remains. However it is definitely more subtle than Mistborn and it definitely was written for a more patient and media-literate audience in mind.
Naturally a series should work better as a whole but if the first part of a book or series doesn't hold my interest, I will have no inclination to finish it.
I'm going to read Way of Kings most likely later in the year. It might appeal to me more.
I am so aligned with your thoughts on this book! It wasn’t the worst YA-leaning book I’ve read but it was far from good with how simplistic the writing and characters were.
Vin in particular felt hollow. She allegedly grew up in a very difficult, political setting and has trauma from that upbringing but conveniently forgets facts about how skaa are treated in multiple conversations with multiple other characters. Her naivety didn’t feel like a character trait so much as a disingenuous need for certain conversational reveals to happen for the reader.
Also, Vin being practically the only female character in this book, outside a few previously fridged women who existed only to elevate men’s tragic backstories and an evil noblewoman, was intolerable. This doesn’t even touch the amount of needless misogyny heaped into the world building.
In any case, I’m really glad I found this review from you! Clearly I have a lot of big opinions on this book and it was very refreshing listening to someone who also is critical about it. Cheers to you!
I have to agree with you on Vin, though to be fair she was very young and the young can be oblivious to what doesn't affect them directly.
However, I am going to disagree with you on there being misogyny in the world building. Were women treated poorly? Yes but that doesn't equate to misogyny for me. It was also very common for older fantasy not to include as many female characters though we cant ignore the fact that a major character in this book is female.
Thank you for sharing your views, I very much enjoy discussing books with others.
@@NerdyKathi re: the misogyny: It’s more than Vin being one of incredibly few women in the entire 500+ book. It’s also the world building leaning hard on the oppression of women without interrogating it deeply. We’re told most skaa women are whores owned by “whoremasters,” one of the key dramatic elements between Vin and Elend is that noblemen sexual abuse skaa women, and the needless world building of “all men are required to attend public executions.” The sum of all of it, to me, says that this author is only using women as dressing and always deeply buried in the background under really harmful circumstances.
Wow, this is the first review I really agree with start to finish. Thank you! I've struggled with understanding why people enjoy reading Sanderson so much, and what I've come up with is that he's what I call a "gateway author", an author people read when they are first getting into reading. I read a gateway author myself, Louis L'Amour was mine. Not a great author, but wrote fun books that were simple for a beginning reader. This is how I view Sanderson. Should you read more Sanderson? Probably not. He does improve in the Stormlight Archive series, but all the issues you highlight are still there. With so many great authors out there there is very little point to spending your time with Sanderson.
Thank you and perhaps you’ve hit the nail on the head, a “gateway” author. I might have loved the book if it was my first foray into fantasy.
I have Way of Kings and will read it before I decide if he’s for me or not.
I appreciate you taking the time to comment.
I just finished the first trilogy and actually really enjoyed it; that being said, I can see where a majority of your criticisms come from. Great review!
I really appreciate that, thank you. 😊
After eventually completing the series, I have come to love it. I interrupted my first readthrough of Mistborn era 1 to read Brandon's Stormlight Archive and after that, it took me forever to come back and complete Mistborn. Reading Stormlight felt like reading a more mature version of Mistborn. Not to say the story is similiar, but Sanderson's writing felt more refined in that series. I eventually completed Mistborn for the cosmere connections.
Thank you for sharing your experience. I am going to read the first book in Stormlight Archive next and if I enjoy it, then it's likely I will go back to Mistborn as well.
After reading through the first book for the second time I can definitely see where you are coming from. English is not my first language and I just recently got back into reading instead of watching tv so I somewhat appreciate the simplistic language. I suspect it would deter me from reading if the language was too complicated. Also I assume the language is as simple and straightforward as it is because the story is told mostly through Vin and she is just a 16-17 year old skaa in the first book and the language she grew up with is rather simple
I can appreciate why you liked the book. There are times I like an easy read as well, but with fantasy, I much prefer it to be more adult.
Thank you very much for sharing.
Glad to find another reviewer with similar thoughts to myself. I thought I was missing something. I read the rest of the trilogy and while book 1 was passable, 2 and 3 were insufferable. If you don't like Vin and/or Elend, you probably won't like the other 2 books. I was quite miffed as he is so popular, as is this series. I was left very disappointed.
I thought I must have missed something as well, and I'm glad I haven't read the others. Nor do I intend to, though never say never. It seems there are a few people who don't like it.
Hi Kathi, I am new to your channel. I totally agreed with you that I don't care for Mistborn that much. I found Vin so annoying and the book was the big letdown for me. I almost DNF'ed halfway through it.
It seems there are a few of us who didn't like the book, though we are a very small minority. Thank you for sharing Shelli.
I didn't get very far into Mistborn, but your opinions mirrored my own in a lot of ways.
If I was the type who DNFs book easily I would have DNF'd this but I'm glad I persisted so I could gauge it's merits and flaws better.
I got halfway through it years ago. I did not intentionally DNF it but just did not pick it back up for too long a time. I do wish to retry it soon. I did read Elantris not too long ago and enjoyed it, mostly the ending.
Thank you for sharing. Hopefully you will enjoy it when you retry it.
I definitely agree with your review! I thought that Kelsier was the most likable character but I liked Vin enough and the other characters felt like a means to end to take down the Lord Ruler. I'm tired of the modern fantasy trope of the downtrodden main character who we are supposed to like simply due to sympathy.
I believe that Sanderson should have condensed this trilogy into a standalone heist fantasy book, especially to start his writing career. It's quite ambitious to write a trilogy at the start of your career and I believe a few standalone and short stories would have been wiser.
I'm almost done with the 2nd book and regarding the world-building, I think Sanderson developed the world as he wrote the books. Even toward the end of book 2, we know much more about history that happened 1000 years ago than we know about the modern world and all the dominances in the empire.
My Elend theory is that Sanderson wrote Elend similar to himself. He wrote this in his early 20s and my guess is that he wanted women to find these bookish & aloof traits desirable, so here comes the Vin and Elend romance. Just a theory, of course lol
I think it is natural for fantasy authors to have an epic story in mind and I believe he had written a stand alone book prior to this series.
Wish fulfilment may very well have played a part in the creation of Elend’s character. I don’t think it is uncommon.
Thank you for sharing your viewpoint.
Agreed, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills given how much praise this series gets. I forced myself through final empire and well of ascension and now I'm halfway through hero of ages and I don't know if I can make it. There are just no likeable characters other than Kelsier and Sazed.
I felt the same way, but I've given up on the series after the first book.
@@NerdyKathi You made the right decision, it just gets worse IMO. Elend replaces Kelsier as the other main character and somehow becomes even more boring in books 2/3
Just found your channel and I agree 100% with your review, I really want it to like this series but it just didn't hit with me.
P.S: I think Kelsier should have been the main character instead of Vin, such a borring character
Thank you. Not all books are for all readers and yes Kelsier would have been a much better protagonist.
Totally agree, and while I prefer a mean spirited review because I hate Brandon Sanderson’s work ☺️, this was so pleasant and honest, you’re an absolute gem. ❤
Your comment made me laugh so hard, though I understand how you feel about Sanderson. I appreciate the kind words very much. Thank you!
I’m 10 books into the wheel of time. And it’s perfect for me. I get to live in this world that Jordan created. So much depth and detail and histories yet plenty of intrigue and ambiguity.
Mistborn everything was told to me through exposition. Not enough world-building and detail! I wanted to live in this city and see what everyday life is like. The cultures and economy etc.
sadly I didn’t get that
I agree I didn't feel immersed in the world either.
I'm sorry to hear you didn't like it, but I do understand your reasoning.
I actually really love this trilogy, and for a lot of the reasons you don't like it, haha. I have aphantasia (I can't form mental images), so I prefer minimal visual description. As much as I love Wheel of Time, it makes parts of those books so tedious for me. I adore Vin and they way he beats you over the head with her fear and anxiety helped me connect to her as someone who's dealt with similar feelings. But I get how that can be frustrating for others, even other people who have similar experiences to her.
Sanderson's prose is definitely simple here and it does improve. I read all 3 Mistborn books in a couple of weeks, so they bleed together, but his recent stuff is considerably more refined. I don't think it's ever that impressive, but I don't think you would view it as a detriment anymore.
As for whether or not you should keep going, I'm not sure. He definitely address your criticisms in the later books, but I don't know if he does it quickly enough (particularly with his writing style, the world and characters gets quickly fleshed out in the next two books). If you wanna try something more recent from him, I recommend the short story The Emperor's Soul. He wrote it while working on WoT and it's more representative of his current writitng style. I don't think you'll be blown away by the prose, but hopefully it's at least adequate.
Thank you very much for sharing.
We all have different tastes and what appeals to one person, doesn't work for others. I can understand why too much description can be frustrating to some, but I do think this book had too little.
I do want to try more of Sanderson's works, but think I am better off reading the first Stormlight Archive book before I decide if I will continue Mistborn.
Harsh but fair criticism
I was trying not to be harsh. Thank you Viktor.
I think I said before that I'm around your age, Kathi, and like you I am not really a fan of YA. It's not that I find it bad or anything, I'm just not that terribly interested. That being said, I loved The Final Empire...while I was reading it. It got me excited for the next two books, but even as I started the second one, the spell that The Final Empire had cast over me was fading a bit. It was like eating junkfood. So yummy and tasty while you're eating it, but afterwards, you realize that there was just not that much substance. I did read both sequels though and to be honest, I found the second one a bit of a slog, the third one a little better with a pretty satisfying ending, but neither had the fast pace or the stakes of the first one, at least not to me. I liked the whole 'heist' aspect of the first one and that was gone in the second two. Not that it would have made any sense to the story to continue that aspect of it, but it was the thing for me that set The Final Empire apart from the other two and made it enjoyable for me. I wouldn't say that I disliked the series overall, but it didn't really get me on Team Sanderson or pumped and excited about reading The Stormlight Archive. Maybe someday.
Hi Spliff. 😊
Interesting isn't it, how sometimes we love a book while reading it, and then on reflection don't like it as much.
Junk food is an excellent analogy!
The heist part was good, but knowing what happens to one character (not naming them to avoid spoilers) and that another character is going to feature even more in the books is yet another reason I don't have any interest in continuing.
Thank you very much for sharing!
I love your reviews Kathi and I appreciate this review as I've been wondering whether to start the Mistborn series because I read one book by Sanderson that I liked and one I DFN'd but I agree about his YA writing style so I suspect he just isn't for me. A few corrections: Mistborn was not Sanderson's first book; Elantris was his first published book. Also, Elantris is decidedly not a novella with its 622 page count. I don't mean to be a jerk by pointing these things out to you but these were easy to find facts and I strongly feel especially reviewers should get facts about authors and their work right. It's only fair right?
Thank you for the correction Daniil. I agree we should try to be as accurate as possible and I thought I had read somewhere that Elantris was a novella and that Final Empire was his first novel. My mistake obviously.
@@NerdyKathi No harm done. Keep the reviews coming. I enjoy them immensely.
Thank you so much for this very articulate review. I agree with you 100%. It simply felt too "YA" to me and it hindered my enjoyment a lot. The magic system and the world itself is interesting enough to at least keep me going but I do not understand the hype for this series.
Before this I read Elantris and I don't remember it feeling so Young Adult, so hopefully the Mistborn series is an exception. I really want to explore the Cosmere but so far both books disappointed me in certain regards. However, I loved the first 2 thirds of Elantris. Only the ending lowered the score I gave it. If felt rushed and unfinished. It packed polish. Have you read Elantris?
Thank you for the kind words and no, I haven't read any other books by Sanderson. Not yet anyway.
I would like to hear your thoughts on other books if you would like to read them sometime in the future ) Characters get more fleshed out due to having more time to talk with one another and stuff, revealing some of their past. For me not knowing much about the world and the characters seemed natural, as Vin wouldn't know that and wasn't interested in paying much attention to the others besides whatever was necessary. I usually like to try to sink into the headspace of the character I follow, and following Vin was a bit annoying throughout the series as she isn't nearly as interested in other characters as I was, but it also was easy for me to follow her. I am a younger reader and was a teen at the time of reading The Final Empire and of course flashy and inventive ways to use simple yet in some ways intricate magic was a big hook for me, albeit more interesting uses come in the two later books. Still, nothing as amazingly big and exciting as Kelsier's storm of metal objects, but some things felt pretty smart.
I also read The Wheel of Time, and despite feeling like the writing was overly flowery at first I instantly fell in love with often notes about characters having distinct hairdos or clothes denoting their possible nation or sometimes age. I loved the descriptiveness and in time got used to what at first felt like dense flowery-ness, and sometimes I do wish that Sanderson used a somewhat similar style at least in places, and Stormlight Archive, the series of which Way of Kings is the first book, sometimes has little things that invoke similar feeling, if still decidedly minimalistic.
At this point, I don't intend to continue the series but I will read Way of Kings soon.
I can understand the magic system being a big hook for readers but I am a reader who is more drawn to characters.
Whilst WOT can seem flowery, it is the descriptiveness of characters, customs and cultures that adds depth to the world.
Thank you very much for sharing.
You're great! Love your videos!
Thank you so much, I'm very grateful.
Finished the trilogy this week. Glad that’s over. It was such an effort to finish. It was definitely young adult and characters under developed. It was just so unbelievable, so far fetched.
I liked the first book out of all three but still not that great.
The ending wasn’t that great. Really don’t know why the hype. I expected a lot more. I just don’t get what the fuss is about. Glad I’m not alone.
Books should not be an effort to finish. I'm sorry to hear you didn't enjoy the ending and I'm surprised that there are more people than I would have thought who also don't like the series.
I am driven by character and and world building in my fantasy books and I feel like Sanderson is very weak on those two fronts. Also, for the breezy YA feel I feel like the books should be funner instead of so dour and depressing.
Same, I am drawn to characters and world building, but as I've only read one of his own books I am reserving judgment until I read another. Thank you for sharing.
I had very similar thoughts reading it, for me it felt very YA, many side characters where gimmicky and simplistic, the instalove thread was really not believeble, given Vins personality. Also in the ending it seemed everyone had a really easy way of getting into the palace which I found hilarious.
On the other hand, I had no problem with Vin's character, or the world being not fleshed out more, I mean it's just the first book in a very long series, so there is time to elaborate these things.
For a large /long fantasy novel I expect a bit more world building in the first book to set the scene. As for Vin, she didn't appeal to me and as she is clearly going to feature in the other books, it's another reason why I won't be continuing with the series.
Good honest review. I kinda liked it, feeling also about the simplicity despite the magic system and good plot. Would you have any recommendations of something better wohtout bwing too complex? Inhave read Silmarillion for the 5th time recently and i would like something easier. 😂
Thanks 😊
Thank you. Hmm, it’s hard to say what would be a good recommendation. It really depends on what you like in fantasy, epic, urban, young adult etc. For classic older fantasy that is a lot of fun I would recommend David Eddings The Belgariad.
@NerdyKathi I appreciate your response a lot. And please forgive my bad writing :D I will look into your recommendation right away!
Certainly an unpopular opinion, I think you're the first person I've come across who doesn't like this book and I'm happy to have finally found someone who share's my opinion! I agree the characters are a bit superficial and really don't like how Sanderson explains and re-explains things over and over. I felt this was part of why his characters lacked depth, as he spent a lot of words reinforcing the couple of key defining traits of the main characters (such as Vin not being trusting) instead of increasing the depth of the characters. When reading this I felt that it was clear Sanderson already knew exactly where the book needed to go at each stage (a strength of his), but this resulted in him achieving the 'milestones' at the expense of actually telling a story and building the characters and worlds.
I have finished the second and third books as I wanted to see where the story would end up, however I wouldn't recommend them to you as most of your criticisms apply for the next books as well.
I am surprised that you haven't seen others who don't like this book on YT, but I know we are in a minority.
I agree with all you said Sam, and frankly, characters and world should not be secondary to plot.
You have reaffirmed for me not to read the other books though I am still intending to read The Way of Kings.
I'm only 4 chapter in, but I'm liking the story so far. However, if I pick at it like you have, yes, the writing is simple. I think the characters are too cartoonish as well, exaggerations of what they represent. They don't feel like real people with mixed emotions and thoughts so far. Vin is the poor abused girl, and Kesler is the uppity troublemaker. He doesn't leave any subtly for us to interpret. We know Vin is abuse, because he states it and show it again and again, trying to get us to sympathize with her. Kesler's character has the same problem. He is optimistic and happy, with no complexity to his character. However, for a simple read, it's engaging. The concept around allomancy is interesting to keep me reading.
As this is a review of the book, then it’s meant to look at different aspects of it. I don’t consider that equates to picking at it which implies unwarranted criticisms.
I can see why people would like the book but it isn’t to my taste.
Hi Kathi
It was so nice you reviews this because I keep seeing in the bookstore and always wondered is I shout pick up a copy. Now I’m thinking I’ll see if the local library has it.
I, same as you, am not a big fan of YA but if you get the chance please please read the Unwind by Neal Shusterman. It’s four books but just give the first one a go if you have the time. This is YA book that I read because my daughter recommended it when she was a teen. The plot and some parts of this book left me broken. I cried almost every time I picked it up and I re read it recently and I couldn’t stop crying again. I can’t event talk about it without getting to emotional. I would love to hear from you if you have read it or if any of your fans have. Would love to see what others think about it.
Hi Jovanka, and thank you! I'm going to add The Unwind to my list. You have me intrigued enough to want to try it.
Could you recommend some fantasy books/series you enjoy? I too couldn't stand Mistborn, I'm looking to get First Law trilogy but I'm scared it's going to be another Mistborn :(
I have a video listing my top 10 favourite fantasy books.
First Law is the anti-mistborn, lmao.
finally someone with some sanity
😂
I gave a go at 4 of his books-did not finish any of them, except mistborn book 1, on a second try nonetheless. Did not like it either for pretty much all the reasons in the video. I do feel left out sometimes for not liking his writing, as if I’m missing something.
I understand exactly how you feel, but I think it all boils down to individual tastes. Also, 4 books is a very good indicator whether an author is for you. I usually try 2 before I make up my mind and I'm still intending to try Way of Kings at some point.
Thank you for sharing Lila.
It took me nearly 2 years to finish this book 😂. It did not grip me at all. It was not bad but I don't get the praise it gets. I genuinely started to question the taste of people who praise this book to the moon.
That's a long time for one book and it didn't grip me either. The truth is not every book is for every person.
I pretty much dnf'd it and read other books. After a while I returned to it and finished it. That's why it took me 2 years.
Great review, to the point. Thank you.
Thank you for watching.
I found your video after making my own videos for each of the books of the trilogy. I absolutely hated books 2 and 3. Some of the most predictable, simplistic books I’ve ever read.
Hi Katey. Well that is yet another reason for me to skip them. I'll have to watch your videos on them.
I've read all of the Cosmere and on book 7 of the Wheel of Time. Sanderson and Jordan both repeat themselves frequently and there are a lot of hidden details that aren't relevant until later books. Brandon is setting up a series, not writing a stand alone novel. I know many adults in their 20's, 30's and 40's that enjoy these books. Mistborn was written as an in between age gaps and something that could be read by YA and adults. So the fact that adults and YA both enjoy the books proves he met his intended goal.
I think there are a lot of details you overlooked about the book because you were put off by Brandon's simplistic writing.
Thank you for sharing your views.
I agree that both Jordan and Sanderson can be repetitive but lay a lot of groundwork for future books.
Obviously, this was not meant to be a stand alone book and I am aware that it is popular to a mixed range of ages but clearly, it didn't appeal to me. Or to many people I know who are of varying ages.
Perhaps there are details I overlooked, but it is inaccurate to state I did not like the book based on only one of the criticisms I have of it.
Great review. Thanks for sharing
My pleasure.
I actually liked book one. However i feel the same way about Vin and Elland as well. Im done ghe trilogy now and trust me the second and third book are much worse. Elland becomes completely insufferable by the end of the trilogy. You earned a sub from me.
I've decided not to continue with it for now. That might change, if I like Sanderson's other books.
Welcome! 😊
@@NerdyKathi Don't waste you time. I did because my OCD over having to know how it all ends forced me to and I regret it. Thanks for the great review. Have a wonderful day.
Great review, I was given this book but I just can't finish it. Especially after reading the Wheel of Time, it's too similar...
I didn't find it similar to WOT, but definitely not in the same league. Thank you very much for sharing.
You’re freaking great
Thank you. 😊
i liked the first book a lot then despised books two and three. so much so i wish i had left it as a stand-alone. i’m nervous to pick up stormlight now
For me, the first and third are the best. I like two, but not as much as the others.
What changed between the first and the other two that made you despise books two and three?
@@kaladongstormguy lots of stuff but i don’t want to get into spoilers or rant about it. i think the main thing was that i recognized his ‘sanderlanche’ style, which made most of the book feel like filler to me. combine that with reading them back to back, being annoyed with repetition and re-explanation, i only enjoyed the last quarter of each book. i will say i was pretty biased going into the third book. i should have taken a break and reset to give it a fair chance. but i didn’t and by the time i hit the last quarter, especially after hearing people say the third book is a lot better than the second, i was an unhappy camper. which surprised me since i really did think the whole first book was great.
@@philip3572 Ah, I get that. I had just read WoT before getting into Mistborn, so I guess I had built up my tolerance for repetition and reexplanation, haha. But without that I can completely understand why reading them back to back would feel like a drag. I never got the filler feeling from the setup for a Sanderlanche, but some parts did kinda drag or felt unimportant now that I think back, so I see what you mean. Have you read any other Cosmere stuff or did your experience with Mistborn sour your perception on Sanderson too much?
Edit: Just reread your original comment saw that you were hesitant to pick up Stormlight. Yeah, I can see why you would. You should definitely take it slow if you do. You might get a good bit of that filler feeling in the first book, but I think the Sanderlanches are much better in Stormlight. I give my tentative encouragement to try it out. I hope you like them!
I'm more inclined to try Stormlight before I decide whether to finish Mistborn. Perhaps I will like it better. Thank you for sharing Philip.
Thank you for sharing but I might wait before reading 2.
"The only reason I continued is because I know how popular it is." Haha same here
😂 Perhaps we should follow our instincts instead.
I didn’t like it either! Very shallow and surface level. Great premise but I wanted more depth
It had potential but not enough to keep me interested.
I don't have to like a character, but I have to find them interesting. Vin was unlikable and uninteresting.
I agree with this.
Great review Kathi i thought i was alone in disliking this. The author is extremely overrated and it's hard to discuss his flaws or criticize without his fans coming after you.
Thank you very much and you might be surprised at how many don't like the book.
I feel the exact same way. I like the stormlihht archive. But when I read this book it felt very much like a chore to read, I was excited because of how hyped it was. But I felt like it was an obligation to continue. Didn’t like any of the characters, and the world just felt paper thin.
@@briani8785 I'm intending to try the Stormlight Archive at some point.
You can definitely dislike but overrated seems to be a jab where none is needed. People obviously enjoy the books even if you don't.