A Solid Vintage Inspired Diver From Oris - Oris Divers Sixty-Five Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024
  • Purchase this watch on my website here: www.teddybalda...
    Shop all of Oris Here: www.teddybalda...
    Book a call with me here: book.teddybald...
    For any questions regarding this watch, you can contact team@teddybaldassrre.com
    Shop Watches: www.teddybalda...
    Shop Straps: www.teddybalda...
    My Main Channel: / teddybaldassarre
    My Instagram: / teddybaldassarre
    On this channel, I review watches that are available for purchase on TeddyBaldassarre.com
    On the site, you'll find access to exclusively written buying guides, a selection of watches for sale from over 15 brands, and a broad selection of watch straps. As an authorized dealer, we're fully backed by the brands we represent with factory warranties and a flexible return policy.
    Purchasing a watch or strap from TeddyBaldassarre.com is the best way to support my free content you find on our main channel.
    I appreciate your business!

ความคิดเห็น • 86

  • @WristWatching
    @WristWatching 4 ปีที่แล้ว +48

    Oris really nailed the looks on this one, even if the specs aren't the best at the price point. Visually, everything just works. Such a lovely piece and great review, Teddy!

    • @TeddyBaldassarreReviews
      @TeddyBaldassarreReviews  4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Agreed 100% - thanks for watching, my friend!

    • @juanantoniocruz2937
      @juanantoniocruz2937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think the dome crystal does this watch so many favors

    • @DonaldPerley
      @DonaldPerley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If they are evoking their 1965, then 100m is appropriate.

  • @tommo3378
    @tommo3378 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I bought this recently for £1500. I love everything about it. A dark blue tropical strap as a “holiday alternative” looks fantastic. The movement is incredibly accurate, and the 40mm case is perfect. It actually wears slightly larger owing to the slim bezel. It’s all down to personal taste, but for me this watch ticks all the vintage diver boxes!

  • @waltersjohn6339
    @waltersjohn6339 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    It is a gorgeous watch. I purchased one on a vintage leather strap. The Sellita based movement is excellent. After six months it is still running at +1 to 2 sec/day. Originally, I bought the 36mm version as I have a smaller wrist.. The case size was almost perfect but be aware that the presence of the domed crystal makes the 36mm version somewhat difficult to read without turning your wrist and looking at it head on. The 40mm version can be read from all angles. Additionally, the smaller version has an 18mm lug width which tapers down to 16 mm at the buckle. This aspect gives the watch an almost "feminine" appearance which I didn't really love. So, I returned it and got the 40 mm version instead.

    • @d_15745
      @d_15745 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is your wrist size?

    • @waltersjohn6339
      @waltersjohn6339 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@d_15745 165 mm

  • @RJ986S
    @RJ986S 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Solid review, Teddy. It's a great looking watch for sure. Love the blue dial and the overall vintage vibe!

  • @zedvirgo1129
    @zedvirgo1129 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Just bought the blue dial. Simple yet elegant design to this Oris 65 and the retro vintage looks great.

  • @treehugger3615
    @treehugger3615 4 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I think the people that will look into this model, will do it for the 36mm version.

    • @markjohn1910
      @markjohn1910 ปีที่แล้ว

      No , 36 is insignificant

    • @khole15
      @khole15 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      38 would be perf

  • @jorgegarrido758
    @jorgegarrido758 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    elegant even though is a diver. great dial, great specs. depending on the situation , it can be use at a formal setting

    • @dparis2172
      @dparis2172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is elegant. I had the chance to visit an Oris AD recently, and after seeing them in the metal and trying them on, I now better understand their appeal. The Diver 65 was a surprise. Vintage, yet modern. Sporty, yet elegant. Not easy to pull that off, I would think, but Oris does this well.

  • @Pivot-Shorts
    @Pivot-Shorts 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    One of the watches right at the top of my wishlist!

  • @craigdlazarus
    @craigdlazarus 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great colourway with this piece - one of the best looking in the range! Thx Teddy - keep 'em coming...

  • @epicunderstament867
    @epicunderstament867 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Love my 36mm Oris Divers Sixty-Five Blue Dial.

    • @epicunderstament867
      @epicunderstament867 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@buzzrenren mine? It’s 6.3 inches in circumference and 50mm in width. The 43mm lug to lug length of the 36mm version fits just right on my wrist

  • @jasonellis112
    @jasonellis112 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Congratulations, you pick a piece with a lot of character !!! You can't go wrong with this, sweet !!!

  • @henrycollins2478
    @henrycollins2478 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ah it’s a good day! A blue dial! Love the watch!

  • @dparis2172
    @dparis2172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I confidently assume that our esteemed host has handled both the Aquis and the Diver 65, so I'm surprised that he stated that the D65 was in close proximity to the Aquis and one might pull sales from the other. The two watches, apart from both being dive watches are almost nothing alike. The 65 is a vintage vibe, lighter wearing watch with a reserved, elegant presence while the Aquis is a modern, heavy watch of larger proportions, greater WR and proprietary end links on the strap and bracelet. I actually took notice of how Oris distinguished their two dive watches from each other.

  • @aquariumaddickuk
    @aquariumaddickuk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sold my Tudor yesterday & spotted a great deal on a two month old 65 diver.
    Arriving tomorrow.
    I'm not expecting Tudor quality but I'm confident it will have more character.

  • @Osrona
    @Osrona 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Lovely watch ! I would prefer the same one but with the green dial....

  • @shaneswann2452
    @shaneswann2452 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The pics in this video do not do this watch justice at all. In person, this piece looks WAY better. Ive tried it on a few times at my AD, and can’t wait to get one in the case!

  • @theannouncer5538
    @theannouncer5538 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That blue captured my heart.

  • @briancarpenter1255
    @briancarpenter1255 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Really great review Teddy. I have always liked Oris because they always have such a great crown. I know that sounds weird but I always look at the crown as a real connection to the watch. I never could get past the price though. I had the Christopher Ward C65 Trident diver with the manual Selitta SW210 and I just don't think you can buy a better watch for the money with all that comes with it, and of course it is also available in an aitomatic. Thanks again Teddy, Brian.

  • @adbraham
    @adbraham 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure why so many think ISO certification applies to this watch, because nowhere on the face of the watch does it say “diver” or “divers”; so there is no requirement for that certification to apply? Love them though; I own the 42mm version of this, and the 60s font version in 40mm.

  • @dandoe1620
    @dandoe1620 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bring back the old of background occasionally. Would be cool imo.

  • @garyk8285
    @garyk8285 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Better than the Seiko SPB143/145?
    This Oris looks really nice, but it might feel like a toy compared to the Seiko SPB143 when in hand. I like a bit of heft in a mechanical watch.

    • @simonf57
      @simonf57 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 65 is far superior

  • @drockkelly
    @drockkelly 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love you carry Oris now! How long have you had them? Will you be carrying their limited edition releases? Nevermind seems you do!

    • @TeddyBaldassarreReviews
      @TeddyBaldassarreReviews  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Just launched them a few days ago and yes we do sell their limited-edition releases. Very pumped!

  • @Wevaah
    @Wevaah 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've been waiting for a review on a Divers Sixty-Five, awesome review. In the future do you think that you'd be able to do a review on the Divers Sixty-Five "Bico"? I've had my eye on one for a while but they're arent too many reviews/videos on TH-cam.

    • @TeddyBaldassarreReviews
      @TeddyBaldassarreReviews  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks, Jacob. Can happily cover it in the future. Very cool watch! Models like that I think show why the 65 line is a great compliment to the Aquis.

    • @Wevaah
      @Wevaah 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@TeddyBaldassarreReviews Alright good to hear! I'll be keeping an eye out for it in the future.

  • @jamiemcneil9462
    @jamiemcneil9462 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Impossible for me to think of this watch as a 'good value' with that SW -200 movement.

    • @chriscon8463
      @chriscon8463 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      And pins in the bracelet instead of screws…

  • @samuelball8775
    @samuelball8775 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice review, love the bracelet on this piece. So thin and the taper and clasp are great. Cheers 👍

  • @alecmoriarty
    @alecmoriarty 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really love the design, especially the bicolor bronze or Carl Brashear, but I just don’t see why they are almost the same price as an Aquis when you get so much less. 🤷‍♂️

    • @theannouncer5538
      @theannouncer5538 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agree, looks nice but a price drop is in order

  • @icas80
    @icas80 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love me a nato so the thin profile is nice.

  • @erichermansen6176
    @erichermansen6176 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Remove the date and bring it in 2 mm and this would strongly appeal to those who can’t get a Black Bay 58?

  • @rickyhou7684
    @rickyhou7684 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Hey Teddy, I’m curious on your take of the sinn 104 I. I’m curious to know if the watch itself really overhung over your wrist given that my wrist and your wrist are approximately the same circumference. I’m worried it might be too big for my wrist, yet I still want to purchase it. If I did which color do you personally prefer the white dial or black dial?

    • @TeddyBaldassarreReviews
      @TeddyBaldassarreReviews  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I owned the white dial in the past. I found that it wore closer to a 40 mm than a 41 mm. I personally think it worked on my wrist just fine. Certainly not a small watch but for the case size wears very well.

  • @mglures
    @mglures 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nice review especially the analysis of the design details, which I agree are iffy in spots.

  • @d_15745
    @d_15745 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anywhere I can try them on (40 and 36) at a physical store Teddy? I live in Manhattan. I’ll purchase through your website of course; I had a pleasant transaction the first time I bought from you so I’ll keep the loyalty. Thank you

  • @peetfj
    @peetfj 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to like this but I doesn't do it for me. The looks are great but would be much better without the date.

  • @adit7277
    @adit7277 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just curious if anyone had an answer is it better to buy the new or old version in 2024?

  • @Josh-yk6xk
    @Josh-yk6xk ปีที่แล้ว

    Stunning watch

  • @nerychristian
    @nerychristian 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pretty watch

  • @khole15
    @khole15 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really good looking watch, too bad they didnt make it more compact

  • @alexs7758
    @alexs7758 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That “Water Resistant” written on the dial bothers me really bad.

  • @TheDerisavi
    @TheDerisavi 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tell Oris to install a fixed mirror polished bezel on this watch with the new movement and I'll buy it immediately instead of the Rolex Explorer I and the Tudor black bay 41.
    Really!

  • @Cekovskid
    @Cekovskid ปีที่แล้ว

    I’m deciding between this one and Tudor 1926, what would u recommend?

  • @williamhill7312
    @williamhill7312 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video

  • @AldermanFredCDavis
    @AldermanFredCDavis ปีที่แล้ว

    Prone to loose, tinny bezels. Loose/insubstantial bezel play, if you will.

  • @beermathuang3874
    @beermathuang3874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you deliver world wide?

  • @j.j.h.atemycereal
    @j.j.h.atemycereal 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would this be considered a “skin diver”? Not an over-sized case, less water resistance?

  • @khole15
    @khole15 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the green version come in 36mm, or only the blue??

  • @karthikm97
    @karthikm97 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm gonna cry.

  • @Duboixofficiel
    @Duboixofficiel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Teddy for a 17cm ( I think 6.8”) wrist, would you recommend this one or the 36mm?

  • @benzo-diazepine
    @benzo-diazepine 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Teddy how tall are you???

  • @siddhesh
    @siddhesh 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have to recommend one from among this Divers Sixty-Five and the Aquis, which one would you go for?

    • @GustapoGomez
      @GustapoGomez 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Paid review buddy. Never ask for a recommendation from someone that doesn’t own the watch you are asking about

  • @andywilliams4887
    @andywilliams4887 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A very pretty watch and lovely dial with its nod to the vintage style, but terrible lume, odd bracelet taper, dubious bezel action and only 100 metres rating for a supposed diver? Not for me at it's price point.

  • @john-carlosynostroza
    @john-carlosynostroza 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How does the fit, finish, reliability and overall longevity of this Oris model compared with a late 90s Omega Seamaster? Forget the obvious about which is more collectible, likely has more prestige, blah blah blah. Is a modern-day watch like this from this brand a better watch with regard to function and reliability compared to a luxury watch from 25 years ago that costs a lot more than and now in scale

  • @trevorharris5374
    @trevorharris5374 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think mine is great 👍

  • @rl7487
    @rl7487 ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s 41 mm

  • @smashexentertainment676
    @smashexentertainment676 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oris has a new caliber 400 5 day power reserve movement. Yet they still use this 38h movement and that's a big no-no for me.

    • @Jabber-ig3iw
      @Jabber-ig3iw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      SmashEX Entertainment you don’t expect them to put their new movement in every watch they make from day one do you?

    • @smashexentertainment676
      @smashexentertainment676 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jabber-ig3iw I only wish that Artix line got either one of the 110-114 calibers, or even 400 one. And I'd happily part with my money. Once the brand starts making in-house movements, it's only a matter of time until they switch all the movements. Like Panerai and Hublot for example.

    • @Jabber-ig3iw
      @Jabber-ig3iw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SmashEX Entertainment yes but it takes time, it won’t happen over night, they have only recently announced the movement and even more recently announced the first watch it will go in.

    • @smashexentertainment676
      @smashexentertainment676 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jabber-ig3iw I can see that :D

  • @michaely.4071
    @michaely.4071 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    With respect. Will you continue to review watches not sold in your shop, or is this a full transition for your channel?

    • @TeddyBaldassarreReviews
      @TeddyBaldassarreReviews  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No I still post 1-2 videos a week on my main channel as always. Those will be longer form as usual.

  • @OuijTube
    @OuijTube 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why would anyone get one of these when the Baltic Aquascaphe exists?

    • @Duboixofficiel
      @Duboixofficiel 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I guess brand equity, resale value? I considered both but now I’m very much swaying towards the Oris, the 36mm version in specific

    • @727coolstuff
      @727coolstuff 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Baltic is a pile of shite compared to this and I’ve owned both and retained the Oris

    • @keefw361
      @keefw361 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Baltic are meant to be a ball of shite. Chinese built crap

  • @mytuberforyou
    @mytuberforyou 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The reason the ISO qualification is 100M is because recreational dive limits are 165' (50 meters) and even commercial operations typically limit to about 220' . The record SCUBA dive is around 1000' but the ascent took an ENTIRE DAY.
    This is so laughable that people think you need 500M or more for a dive watch, the latest issue of Christopher Ward's "Loupe" magazine wrote "When you are 1000 feet down", I wonder how many actual divers like myself spit out their coffee reading that marketing drivel?
    Also many folks do not understand the proper use of the bezel (it's not to "record your dive time") and I hate to beat up on CW again but they have a video in which a woman explains (completewly the wrong way) how to use the bezel.
    Probably the top feature you should be looking for in a diver is either a rubber strap or a spring loaded bracelet like the Pelagos, particularly if you are a wetsuit driver or the watch is going over neoprene gloves. because closed-cell neoprene compresses at depth and your watch will want to slide around and roll case-down on your wrist.

    • @stefanotattifrongia3612
      @stefanotattifrongia3612 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Holy words. I worked for year in a resort and no one in the diving team use an automatic watch. They are just a vintage things. Divers use diver computer end of the story.

  • @deedee8568
    @deedee8568 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Someone else's (bigger) wrist?

  • @Javi_C
    @Javi_C 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    :)