Most Credible UFO Encounters With Evidence | The Alaska Triangle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
  • Subscribe to DMAX for more great clips: bit.ly/2Fuweyc
    Some of the most credible and notable UFO encounters, with evidence, seen inside of the Alaska Triangle.#TheAlaskaTriangle #DMAX
    🇬🇧 Catch full episodes of your favourite DMAX shows on discovery+: bit.ly/41DFZTB
    From Season 2.
    Like DMAX on Facebook: / dmaxuk
    Follow DMAX on Twitter: / dmax_uk

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @DMAXUK
    @DMAXUK  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Subscribe to DMAX for more great clips: bit.ly/2Fuweyc

  • @hissatsu4937
    @hissatsu4937 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Watching the first clip I can't help not to think about the plane that disappeared in 2014. You probably know which one I'm talking about, and you've probably seen the two videos too that shows how the plane disappears inside what looks like a wormhole.
    It's up to each of their own to make an opinion if the videos are real or not.

    • @DR-qd7go
      @DR-qd7go 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I’ve seen other videos on TH-cam showing orbs taking objects away. It’s like they’re a defense system and accidentally took away the object in the video you’re referring to.
      It’s really all kind of creepy.

  • @irataylor7102
    @irataylor7102 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was heading to downtown Anchorage one night I saw a a light in the sky over cook inlet, thinking it was a plane flying into the international airport when it just went straight up and with in seconds disappeared. I pulled over got out of my car and scanned the skies but never saw the light again

  • @kristybarker924
    @kristybarker924 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We still haven't found MH370 either

  • @BegudMaximan-zp2tc
    @BegudMaximan-zp2tc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It is surely clear that outside influences were highly likely to be involved, beyond normal expectation, as no wreckage was ever reportedly found., which is virtually impossible unless it went down over water.
    Given the entire circumstances it can therefore be assumed the aircraft was 'taken' by external forces, as no other totally plausible theory comes close.
    But taken by who?

  • @Foersom_
    @Foersom_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    8:40 could also be camera movement from a handheld camera when filming a zoomed in object.

  • @Pavel_Poluian
    @Pavel_Poluian หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Me quite obvious that since the late 40s of the twentieth century, a secret project has been developing in the United States for the development and production of aircraft, where the lifting force is created using high-frequency vibration. It all started with James Pitts' "Sky Car" vibrating orthotopter umbrella, then the umbrella was closed with a dome and devices appeared according to the scheme of conventional electromagnetic vibrating speakers (membrane + inductance) - fragments of the membrane were found by a farmer in Roswell. Then they created piezoelectric thrusters, or with small dischargers on the surface (they glowed all over the body due to ionization of the air), and now they are planes with plasma propulsion panels (so they are angular - that is, with flat surfaces). Thousands of discharge cells are densely packed into motor panels - they shoot streams of plasma (railgun architecture - coaxial electrodes). The ionized air of the spark discharge is accelerated in the railgun chamber by the Lorentz force to enormous speeds - a kind of ramjet engine is obtained. Just imagine! - tens of thousands of small ramjet engines assembled in panels and launching plasma synchronously at a huge frequency (hundreds of kilohertz). Plasma jets form toroidal air vortices - this air cushion creates lift and acceleration. See, for example, the MARAUDER (Magnetically Accelerated Ring to Achieve Ultra-high Directed Energy and Radiation) project. My article "UFOs are made in the USA" and the books "UFO Hunt" and "UFO Elimination" describe all this in detail. The technology is quite mundane - it is known in great detail thanks to information leaks. For example, air ionization in the coaxial elements of a railgun is created using radiation (radioactive polonium is introduced into the metal). Devices of this type were used throughout the 50s-60s-70s-80s for secret missions (they took off, as a rule, from special submarines). With the fall of the USSR, their use by the United States was practically curtailed (in the novel "Little Green Men" by Christopher Buckley, speechwriter Bush Sr., a scene is described where the US president decides to curtail the "flying saucer" project). The winding down of the project can be recorded by the drop in magnesium consumption in the United States, since such fuel was used in fuel cells (magnesium strips were burned in forced galvanic batteries), this is 2007-2008. However, later the development of the technology continued in the Russian Federation and China (the technology was restored by reverse engineering methods for downed devices). Secrecy, however, was maintained and there was no civilian use because the technology was not suitable for it - harmful microwave radiation from pulsed plasma thrusters (harm to pilots and impact on electrical appliances inside and along the flight line). The payload is small (but one nuclear charge is enough). There is no radio communication - the discharges create interference and jam electronics - unmanned vehicles can fly and maneuver only in accordance with the program. Previously, there was a narrow application profile - rare spy missions (so that pilots do not get a lot of radiation). Reconnaissance aircraft of this type were often observed at military bases, missile launch sites and airfields. They were even seen by peaceful geologists in the taiga, where clearings for seismic exploration were laid - UFOs flew there to check whether military construction was underway (I myself heard stories about this))). I think that soon this technology will be declassified, and cargo airships with flickering round plasma panels on the surface of the hull will appear in the Arctic sky.

  • @Foersom_
    @Foersom_ 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    5:30 Interesting but could it be balloons with a structure with 3 lights below? Wind changing?

  • @samp4050
    @samp4050 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    His mother was a pilot?! Wow, what an amazing mom!😮 ❤

  • @So1othurn
    @So1othurn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Right over the Dark Pyramid

  • @DianneSparren
    @DianneSparren หลายเดือนก่อน

    Portals?!

  • @DianneSparren
    @DianneSparren หลายเดือนก่อน

    Possible portals

  • @mparkes1821
    @mparkes1821 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I groan whenever I see stuff like this, I’m no skeptic, I believe there is something but this stuff is laughable and does nothing for the real phenomena, fuzzy lights that could be anything, just because they don’t think it’s planes, drones, satellites etc doesn’t make it so, and come on we see the zig zag motion all the time, stationary object with camera being moved giving a false impression, the sad thing is you think that folks believe it, some do sadly, but for heavens sake these tv channels need to do better or maybe it’s a case of they’re doing exactly as they’re told by the govt, keep the titter factor going, they’re all crazy yeah

    • @user-ej7qt5vu1w
      @user-ej7qt5vu1w หลายเดือนก่อน

      In fact uap or ufo are 100% man made. Satellites for example travel more than 10,000 mph and people say we dont have that tech. Of course we have the tech to travel more than 30,000 mph but its above top secret!

  • @grundy333
    @grundy333 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Evidence please. Thank you.

  • @namesurname9598
    @namesurname9598 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ✈️🛩🛩✈️🛫🛬🚤🚁

  • @clarencewalker3925
    @clarencewalker3925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When extraterrestrials meet with the President and the Prime Minister of GB, then I'll believe it.

    • @jmichna1
      @jmichna1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Various authors claim Eisenhower met (secretly) with extraterrestrials as many as three times beginning in 1954. The original sources for these claims are a government consultant and FBI sources, from that era.

    • @user-ju4io4hw9g
      @user-ju4io4hw9g 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      How do you know they haven’t? Word is, they’ve been doing it for years. The fact that you think governments are always honest with us is hilarious. 😂