Labor only employed Matt Kean ( a so called Liberal but blind mad ideological Green) to head its renewables plan because they new that he would continue to drive ( with " blackout " ,of course ) ,their unachievable 82% green energy target by 2030.
Exactly thank you. They said "renewables are the cheapest form of energy" In what fucking world is wind and solar the cheapest form of energy. People wake the fuck up.
We need to withdraw from the ridiculous Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available. Nuclear power plants should be legal in Australia, however, coal fired power plants should be built if they are cheaper.
@johngeier8692 nuclear power plants currently don't make money for politicians when they work out how to get their hands on some then we will have nuclear power
@@billybloggs3214 Coal is NOT reliable. Callide C4 is finally back online after a catastrophic explosion in May 2021 that left 400,000 people without power. It has cost hundreds of millions to fix
Thorium, we have that here also.. 😮 If businesses operated, I thought like most politicians, either side . They'll all be broke.. No accountability or jail time for their constant fraud on humanity.
we have enough thorium lying around in mining tailings dams [ no mining specifically for thorium as its a waste product ] to power australia for ten thousand years ! pretty sure by then we will be getting the stuff out of asteroids as a by product as well but i'm sure another power source will be discovered by then [ fusion, zero point , mini black holes ect]
Please start asking Labor politicians how much area will need to be occupied with wind turbines and solar panels to substantially replace Australia's annual 5800 Pj of energy and do they think they can do it in less than 10,000 square kilometers.
We are already adding 3GW a year to our rooftops, the equivalent capacity of a couple of nuclear reactors. This is hollowing out grid demand. Last week grid demand fell below 10 GW for the first time.
@@tassied12 So what. One nuclear plant out of how many around the world? In QLD a coal fired power station went down because of a catastrophic failure of an alternator. Same in Victoria when a wind farm went down in SA.
It is also very easy to clean up coal fired power. We burn the crap coal here for starters and send the black stuff offshore. We do the same with our steak.
If nuclear is the best thing since sliced bread why is Taiwan shutting down all their nuclear power. If it's so cheap why won't Dutton give us a number? Any number between 0 and 100% will do. Is the 'Expert' Ms Riley's brother in law?
The electricity network has to be in balance. The voltage must be stable in order for it to work. Stop-start renewables that switch on and off at all hours of the day and night, cause mayhem for the network operators. They inject chaos into the energy network. These renewables are an actual liability.
A much bigger problem is when coal and nuclear plants suddenly go offline, taking 100's of MW offline with no notice. They are large single points of failure. The explosion at Callide C resulted in 400,000 people losing power (and the plant is only coming back online now after over 3 years) A distributed grid is much more reliable. The most reliable grids in Europe in terms of lost time per customer are in Denmark and Germany. Both have high concentrations of renewable generation. There are multiple factors at play, but they show that high renewables dont necessarily lead to an unreliable grid.
OMG, there's not one comment, besides mine, that is critical of this guy and his 'big tobacco' like spiel. Why do I waste my time with this RWNJ channel on TH-cam?
No bank will finance a new coal plant in Australia due to the risk of it becoming a stranded asset. The operators of Bayswater have been trialling a two-shift setup where generators are shut down completely during the day because there is insufficient demand.
@@Leo555ZZZ the renewables go to tender to bid for 10-30% subsidies. so there's 70-90% private money. The libs are saying we should ignore the market, not ask any companies to bid, and build it with 100% taxpayer money, or even more subsidies than the renewables are getting. Just be consistent. if 10-30% subsidies are bad then......100% subsidies are worse
@@ryanmadden7921 If there is 70 to 90% private money it is only there to reap the Govt subsidies and the revenue in a distorted market . Include the cheap taxpayer funded finance and the subsidies are even higher ...we have spent tens of billions of dollars on renewables via subsidies and mandates and the only benefit has been to the investors and the builders . Our electricity bills are forced higher and higher as the renewables penetration increases. I repeat , if not for the RET , the emissions reduction target , the low cost finance , all the free money being put on the table by the government , wind and large solar would not exist because they would not be economically viable for anyone to invest the capital.
I'd support that, even though I prefer renewables over nuclear. As long as the federal government doesn't compete with private enterprise in the construction of whatever follows ...
"An unprecedented global mobilisation of renewable energy, forest protection and other measures is needed to steer the world off the current path towards a catastrophic temperature rise of 3.1C, a report from the UN environment programme (Unep) has found. Extreme heatwaves, storms, droughts and floods are already ravaging communities with less than 1.5C of global heating to date." the guardian
You go right ahead believing that however put your critical thinking hat on for the moment and have a little think about how coal came to be buried in the ground it was indeed yesterday's vegetation buried and compressed over millions of years same with oil except different base materials. Now while your thinking if you rewind about 20yrs those same experts were telling us of this massive sea level rises well I live by the water and there is no noticeable difference and that's over 60yrs . The planet is cyclic in its weather patterns volcanic upheavals and subsidences and sorry to tell you but man cannot control nature. At the end of the day the planet will keep on evolving always has always will,man may not be here but at the end of the day we are about as significant to this planet as a grain of sand on a beach .
Question for matt Kean - In the past 10 years, more than 34 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear power capacity were added in China, bringing the country's number of operating nuclear reactors to 55 with a total net capacity of 53.2 GW as of April 2024. An additional 23 reactors are under construction in China. Matt why is China building so many nuclear reactors? Logic tick tock.
@@dfor50 I'm in two minds about that - but water IS ALREADY in private hands. And a lot of our energy. I'd *prefer* a state run monopoly, but that inevitably ends in disaster. And remember, it was the conservatives who championed "privatisation".
@@footbru "water IS ALREADY in private hands" maybe in your state but not in Queensland. Queensland government also owns all the distribution network of our energy. I believe in private enterprise but strategic and essential assets should be community owned and run.
@@dfor50 As I said, I'm in two minds. I wish all schools and hospitals were owned & run by government. The only thing the feds should do is defence and immigration. Don't forget, Dutton isn't proposing that QLD or Victoria build, own and run these nuclear plants - he wants the federal government to do it. Build SEVEN plants simultaneously, in different states, with no experience. We don't build planes or ships, private companies are outsourced for roads and bridges. I just don't see it. But, like hospitals and education, I don't think what I want matters much.
In Australia, we have very few metal finishing (electroplating ) businesses - mainly because of the chemical waste problems - pollution. You guys who are promoting nuclear energy are bloody insane. - th-cam.com/video/hiAsmUjSmdI/w-d-xo.html
Solar and wind have a short life less than 20 years, considering that they produce energy only 25% of their lifespan that shortens the real energy producing time to 5 years before a replacement is needed from China manufactured by utilizing coal.
Solar panels come with 30 years warranties, and can produce power long past that time. They just retired Australia's first wind turbine after 40 years of service.
@@footbru So 30 year warranty from a Chinese company owned by the government of China where you have to litigate your claim in China. Winning your warranty claim is as certain as the arctic been ice free 12 years ago. You could buy local but after the government subsidies are distributed to offshore accounts they go bankrupt just like Solindra did. Wow 40 years so the installation actually produced between 8 to 10 years worth of electricity, what do you do the other 30 years?
@@footbru So 30 year warranty from a Chinese company owned by the government of China where you have to litigate your claim in China. Winning your warranty claim is as certain as the arctic been ice free 12 years ago. You could buy local but after the government subsidies are distributed to offshore accounts they go bankrupt just like Solindra did. Wow 40 years so the installation actually produced between 8 to 10 years worth of electricity, what do you do the other 30 years?
@@CBultmann As I said, Solar panels come with 30 years warranties, and can produce power long past that time. They just retired Australia's first wind turbine after 40 years of service.
Geologists, like Ian Pilmer,are highly qualified in understanding how the planet works. Many of the money hungry people pushing a renewables only grid are ignorant of the planets natural functions.
@@lloydsingline340 Ian Pilmer has had several directorships with resource companies. No one directly involved in the energy sector in Australia considers nuclear to be a viable option
![งมหอย จับปลา มือเปล่า หาอยู่หากินแบบวีถีอีสานกับแก๊งเซียนหรั่ง ม่วนคัก! [ขอนแก่น] @Sianstudio](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JEJZg6N-AbU/mqdefault.jpg)
Any time you have Matt Kean involved in anything you know it’s self serving and a disaster for everyone else.
...and Ian Plimer has held several directorships in the mining industry
Matt Kean = Bastardry on Steroids ...😡🤬
Kean the male version of Thorpe, he's just another nut job
Yes, returning trolleys for Woolworths.
Labor only employed Matt Kean ( a so called Liberal but blind mad ideological Green) to head its renewables plan because they new that he would continue to drive ( with " blackout " ,of course ) ,their unachievable 82% green energy target by 2030.
....read knew.
@TruthWarri He could do the rounds on the streets to pick up trollies left there. I doubt his brain could cope with the normal trolley run!
No one in the current government understands fundamentals
some probably just want to send us back to thatched roof village level oof existence and did too much mushrooms when they were in college
The voice of delusional insanity permeates the current government which is colluding with ridiculous and economically destructive popular delusions.
But what dumb idiot put them there
RENEWABLES ARE A MONEY MAKER FOR THESE PEOPLE THAT PUSHING THE AGENDA!
Exactly thank you.
They said "renewables are the cheapest form of energy"
In what fucking world is wind and solar the cheapest form of energy.
People wake the fuck up.
Matt Kean, who has absolutely no qualifications in the energy sector is a good match with Chris Bowen who also has no qualifications in that area
Well,the Australian voter put them there
Mad Matt, I never listen to a word he says.
We need to withdraw from the ridiculous Paris Accord and simply use the most economical energy resources available.
Nuclear power plants should be legal in Australia, however, coal fired power plants should be built if they are cheaper.
@johngeier8692 nuclear power plants currently don't make money for politicians when they work out how to get their hands on some then we will have nuclear power
follow the money and you will see why they are so against Nuclear
There is massive misappropriation of taxpayers money due to popular delusion based energy policy.
There is a massive misappropriation of taxpayers money due to ludicrous energy policy based upon economically destructive popular delusions.
exactly , the whole thing is crooked, china buying up wind farms, as you say follow the money.
The LNP proposal is for taxpayers to fund nuclear - the business world doesn't want to touch nuclear with a barge pole
@@tassied12Microsoft, Google, Amazon?
You have to look into who holds and has made money from investing in the renewable companies
thats how anal bought his new house.
Prices will never go down while foreign and domestic corporations control our resourcesmatt kean after a 4.3 million dollar beach house as well
Come, why ruin a good narrative with the truth?
Go with something reliable that actually works and is there when we need it like nuclear.
Coal
Gas
Simple 🏌️♂️
@@billybloggs3214 Coal is NOT reliable. Callide C4 is finally back online after a catastrophic explosion in May 2021 that left 400,000 people without power. It has cost hundreds of millions to fix
Matt Kean works for renewable investors like Malcolm Turnbull.
Thorium, we have that here also.. 😮 If businesses operated, I thought like most politicians, either side . They'll all be broke.. No accountability or jail time for their constant fraud on humanity.
we have enough thorium lying around in mining tailings dams [ no mining specifically for thorium as its a waste product ] to power australia for ten thousand years ! pretty sure by then we will be getting the stuff out of asteroids as a by product as well but i'm sure another power source will be discovered by then [ fusion, zero point , mini black holes ect]
What's Matt Kean smoking?
Your $$$$
@@rogermckinnon5738now that's the truth.😅
Not one person in Labor have any relevant qualifactions for the portfolios they hold including this dill.
That's why Australians should never forget this and never ever vote Labor again even if the LNP struggles for a few years
Thank God the LNP is full of highly qualified engineers and infrastructure experts
Please start asking Labor politicians how much area will need to be occupied with wind turbines and solar panels to substantially replace Australia's annual 5800 Pj of energy and do they think they can do it in less than 10,000 square kilometers.
And how much will it cost.
We are already adding 3GW a year to our rooftops, the equivalent capacity of a couple of nuclear reactors. This is hollowing out grid demand. Last week grid demand fell below 10 GW for the first time.
3 GW of intermittent power.
@@davidbwn The sun gets up every day. Callide C4 was offline for 3 years.
@@tassied12 So what. One nuclear plant out of how many around the world? In QLD a coal fired power station went down because of a catastrophic failure of an alternator. Same in Victoria when a wind farm went down in SA.
It is also very easy to clean up coal fired power. We burn the crap coal here for starters and send the black stuff offshore. We do the same with our steak.
If nuclear is the best thing since sliced bread why is Taiwan shutting down all their nuclear power. If it's so cheap why won't Dutton give us a number? Any number between 0 and 100% will do. Is the 'Expert' Ms Riley's brother in law?
💯WEF designed.💯
And Kean’s in charge. Awesome!
The electricity network has to be in balance. The voltage must be stable in order for it to work.
Stop-start renewables that switch on and off at all hours of the day and night, cause mayhem for the network operators.
They inject chaos into the energy network.
These renewables are an actual liability.
A much bigger problem is when coal and nuclear plants suddenly go offline, taking 100's of MW offline with no notice. They are large single points of failure. The explosion at Callide C resulted in 400,000 people losing power (and the plant is only coming back online now after over 3 years)
A distributed grid is much more reliable. The most reliable grids in Europe in terms of lost time per customer are in Denmark and Germany. Both have high concentrations of renewable generation. There are multiple factors at play, but they show that high renewables dont necessarily lead to an unreliable grid.
@@tassied12And what’s your electrical engineering background?
Matt will bark like a dog if you pay him money.
No Gloss in Matt Kean.
MK should unsubscribe from Mr Pants on Fire email scripts on BS, so should Bonehead Bowen...VOTE THEM OUT...
☢☢☢☢☢☢☢☢☢☢👌👌
Mat lean. “Briefly worked as an accountant. “ this says it all!
Don't we wish he had stayed in that field. Hold on,he failed there too when he was treasurer for NSW.
Matt and Chris double disaster for Australia
OMG, there's not one comment, besides mine, that is critical of this guy and his 'big tobacco' like spiel. Why do I waste my time with this RWNJ channel on TH-cam?
Plimer is a geologist and as thick as the rocks he purports to study.
Who bribes Matt?? Leave it to yr imagination
Coal is King end of story . This self harm is insane with our electricity grid .
No bank will finance a new coal plant in Australia due to the risk of it becoming a stranded asset. The operators of Bayswater have been trialling a two-shift setup where generators are shut down completely during the day because there is insufficient demand.
@@tassied12 Well checked Bayswater today and three units have been operating all day according to NEM App.
@@pookeyhutchison7838 The first trial has been completed and reported on 3 weeks ago by the GM
Further trials are on the way.
@@pookeyhutchison7838 Trial #1 completed with more to come.
@@tassied12 No reality in you only BS .Just facts mate.
The reason they are called renewables is we have to renew everything twice before 2050
Simply not true.
Rather have 100sq KM of forest than stupid solar panels and flippy flappy windmills. That are high maintenance, over technical and intermittent.
Mr Keane just confirms idiots come in all shapes and sizes
A Geologist arguing with a Politician via a media commentator. Where the hell are the Engineers????
They don't come much d umber or do they? Bowen and Albo.
Poor ol Matty, no clue about anything: he’s the ship jumper
Market led? Aah, I don't think so.
Lots and lots and lots and lots and lots of concrete too.
True socialists want ideology and wishful thinking to trump facts and reality .
the current nuclear proposal is 100% subsidized. That's the opposite of market driven
If not for subsidies and mandates , there would not be any wind and large solar installations . That is no different.
@@Leo555ZZZ the renewables go to tender to bid for 10-30% subsidies. so there's 70-90% private money. The libs are saying we should ignore the market, not ask any companies to bid, and build it with 100% taxpayer money, or even more subsidies than the renewables are getting. Just be consistent. if 10-30% subsidies are bad then......100% subsidies are worse
@@ryanmadden7921 If there is 70 to 90% private money it is only there to reap the Govt subsidies and the revenue in a distorted market . Include the cheap taxpayer funded finance and the subsidies are even higher ...we have spent tens of billions of dollars on renewables via subsidies and mandates and the only benefit has been to the investors and the builders .
Our electricity bills are forced higher and higher as the renewables penetration increases.
I repeat , if not for the RET , the emissions reduction target , the low cost finance , all the free money being put on the table by the government , wind and large solar would not exist because they would not be economically viable for anyone to invest the capital.
It cost money to fix problems
That’s why they are created
Just make sure no one is accountable.
Why doesn't Labor lift any existing bans. No matter who installed. But open debate on nuclear
I'd support that, even though I prefer renewables over nuclear. As long as the federal government doesn't compete with private enterprise in the construction of whatever follows ...
Matt Kean is Malcolm Turnbull's money puppet
I bet Matt Kean knows all about nuclear energy , after all he's an effing CPA !
"An unprecedented global mobilisation of renewable energy, forest protection and other measures is needed to steer the world off the current path towards a catastrophic temperature rise of 3.1C, a report from the UN environment programme (Unep) has found. Extreme heatwaves, storms, droughts and floods are already ravaging communities with less than 1.5C of global heating to date." the guardian
You go right ahead believing that however put your critical thinking hat on for the moment and have a little think about how coal came to be buried in the ground it was indeed yesterday's vegetation buried and compressed over millions of years same with oil except different base materials. Now while your thinking if you rewind about 20yrs those same experts were telling us of this massive sea level rises well I live by the water and there is no noticeable difference and that's over 60yrs . The planet is cyclic in its weather patterns volcanic upheavals and subsidences and sorry to tell you but man cannot control nature. At the end of the day the planet will keep on evolving always has always will,man may not be here but at the end of the day we are about as significant to this planet as a grain of sand on a beach .
Never Voted liberal before I will be this time round
Question for matt Kean - In the past 10 years, more than 34 gigawatts (GW) of nuclear power capacity were added in China, bringing the country's number of operating nuclear reactors to 55 with a total net capacity of 53.2 GW as of April 2024. An additional 23 reactors are under construction in China. Matt why is China building so many nuclear reactors? Logic tick tock.
"Intervene in the market" = Subsidies for renewables.
"Intervene in the market" = government built nuclear power stations, at taxpayer expense, as a monopoly.
@@footbru You trust private enterprise to own and run our energy? Let's give them our water too.
@@dfor50 I'm in two minds about that - but water IS ALREADY in private hands. And a lot of our energy.
I'd *prefer* a state run monopoly, but that inevitably ends in disaster. And remember, it was the conservatives who championed "privatisation".
@@footbru "water IS ALREADY in private hands" maybe in your state but not in Queensland. Queensland government also owns all the distribution network of our energy. I believe in private enterprise but strategic and essential assets should be community owned and run.
@@dfor50 As I said, I'm in two minds. I wish all schools and hospitals were owned & run by government. The only thing the feds should do is defence and immigration.
Don't forget, Dutton isn't proposing that QLD or Victoria build, own and run these nuclear plants - he wants the federal government to do it. Build SEVEN plants simultaneously, in different states, with no experience.
We don't build planes or ships, private companies are outsourced for roads and bridges. I just don't see it.
But, like hospitals and education, I don't think what I want matters much.
In Australia, we have very few metal finishing (electroplating ) businesses - mainly because of the chemical waste problems - pollution. You guys who are promoting nuclear energy are bloody insane. - th-cam.com/video/hiAsmUjSmdI/w-d-xo.html
Fool is keen!
You mean Woke WEF Charlie ...
Solar and wind have a short life less than 20 years, considering that they produce energy only 25% of their lifespan that shortens the real energy producing time to 5 years before a replacement is needed from China manufactured by utilizing coal.
Solar panels come with 30 years warranties, and can produce power long past that time.
They just retired Australia's first wind turbine after 40 years of service.
@@footbru So 30 year warranty from a Chinese company owned by the government of China where you have to litigate your claim in China. Winning your warranty claim is as certain as the arctic been ice free 12 years ago. You could buy local but after the government subsidies are distributed to offshore accounts they go bankrupt just like Solindra did. Wow 40 years so the installation actually produced between 8 to 10 years worth of electricity, what do you do the other 30 years?
@@footbru So 30 year warranty from a Chinese company owned by the government of China where you have to litigate your claim in China. Winning your warranty claim is as certain as the arctic been ice free 12 years ago. You could buy local but after the government subsidies are distributed to offshore accounts they go bankrupt just like Solindra did. Wow 40 years so the installation actually produced between 8 to 10 years worth of electricity, what do you do the other 30 years?
@@CBultmann As I said,
Solar panels come with 30 years warranties, and can produce power long past that time.
They just retired Australia's first wind turbine after 40 years of service.
@@CBultmann And BTW, my solar panels were manufactured in Germany.
When did geologists become experts in our grid
Geologists, like Ian Pilmer,are highly qualified in understanding how the planet works. Many of the money hungry people pushing a renewables only grid are ignorant of the planets natural functions.
Smarter than a failed politician.
Ian Plimer is suddenly being paid for his advocacy ... he'll say anything for a buck.
Yes just wait until you see what cyclones, tornadoes, hail storms and solar flares will do to your renewables.
@@lloydsingline340 Ian Pilmer has had several directorships with resource companies. No one directly involved in the energy sector in Australia considers nuclear to be a viable option
Asking a geologist for energy advice wow next I want advice on electricity usage I will ask a plumber. No wonder Sky News viewers numbers are down.
Ask a politician for energy advice ,,they always tell the truth don't they ?
Nomenclature lefty, even when in state parliament. Who selected him for Liberals leading position? 🐏🇦🇺
Your like button doesn't work
Kean, please go away and take your renewable bullshit with you
A delight to listen to a man of education and intellect.