MOST FAILED ENGINES ever put in production cars | Worst engine blunder!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 754

  • @oveidasinclair982
    @oveidasinclair982 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    My dad had a Deathstar engine in his 96 El Sagundo, he only had that car for 18 months or so, he said he loved it, but it had a 2 quart a month oil leak from the oil pan, there was a transmission leak, AC Freon leak, but the car drove like a dream. He also had a 99 Dodge Intrepid with the 2.7 liter, he purchased that car from a 98 year old man who only put 80,000 miles on it and in the last 10 years it never went over 35mph. It was only driven from his place to the grocery store, or McDonalds, when dad started driving it at highway speeds (between 60-70mph) and number of things started failing in quick succession. The thermostat failed open, the electric cooling fans died, Cam sensor died and then it started both consuming and leaking oil (3 quarts a month), every 3000 miles all you really had to do was change the oil filter, the oil was almost brand new. He gave that car to my older sister, her then boy took it for a ride, blasted through a red light and got T-Boned by a brand new 7 series BMW, totaling both cars.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @davidkilts1670
      @davidkilts1670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I hope the kid was ok. The car was given a fast death rather than a long lingering death. It took out a Beemer in passing!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@davidkilts1670 Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @AdelynDodson
    @AdelynDodson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    GM and Chrysler continue to use cylinder deactivation, but it's proving to be just as problematic as before. The uneven heat generated by this technology is actually leading to premature engine wear.

    • @AilaniMadden
      @AilaniMadden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      GM made several missteps in the late '70s and '80s as they struggled to comply with CAFE standards. It's yet another instance of government overreach causing unintended consequences.🥲🥲🥲

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes.... It was so great when we got your information to us and all enthusiasts too.
      That is super important information for our channel, spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @dirtthunder1638
      @dirtthunder1638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Bull 💩. There is no problem with MDS causing premature wear.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@dirtthunder1638 Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day.

    • @aaadamt964
      @aaadamt964 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@dirtthunder1638 I can't tell if you're joking, trolling, lying or just not informed...

  • @garyszewc3339
    @garyszewc3339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +53

    I've got personal experience, with almost every one of these engines. The Olds diesel, was at it's worst in 1978. They did not have heavier blocks, until 1979. My dad, had a 1978 88. Not only were the engines bad, they put the turbo 200 transmission, designed for the Chevette, in them. I worked as a mechanic, in an Olds dealer in 1980. They had an entore bay, filled with complete diesel engines, for warranty replacements. I had a 2001 Eldorado, with the Northstar. They came with an 8 quart oil pan, because they burned 3 quarts of oil, between oil changes. We were told, if the low oil level light comes on, pull into any GM dealer, and they will fill it for free. Their excuse was they were built loose, to maximize power. Lol. A friend of mine, made a living for a couple years, rebuilding Chrysler V6s. The problem with them, is the water pump is inside the engine. If the water pump failed, the coolant dumped into the oil pan, or, if the timing chain stretched, it jumped teeth, and the valves struck the pistons. He would go to the junkyard, and buy heads. He would disassemble them, and take all the straight valves, to replace bent ones. He coud buy the cars, in good condition, with bad motors, for $300-500, buy parts for $150, and sell the car for $3,000. My brother in law had an F150, with the 5.4, that blew the spark plugs out, from bad threads. The problem is, bad engines don't show up, for a few years. Don't ever buy a new engine design. Another one, is any Ford turbo. They all blow eventually. I made sure to buy my 2024 Ram truck, while the proven Hemi was available. I know those issues. All 2025s have turbo 6s, which are not proven yet, and will probably be as bad, as Ford turbos.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Wow....That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @garyszewc3339
      @garyszewc3339 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 I have had a few muscle cars too. Right now I am restoring a 73 Challenger 340 Rallye. A long term project.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@garyszewc3339 Fantastic... I wish to have opportunities to drive some of these
      Hope to know more information about Muscle Cars or your collection on our channel to us and all fans too.
      Have a nice week. 🤩🤩🤩 love it

    • @JohnVanLandingham-e7v
      @JohnVanLandingham-e7v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The good Buick v 6 was good from the start

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JohnVanLandingham-e7v Thank you for your comment.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @robinwikerstam9943
    @robinwikerstam9943 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The fact that he didn't even mentioned where the starter is located in the Northstar engine is wild :D

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You're absolutely right! The starter location on the Northstar engine is definitely unique - it's actually mounted under the intake manifold, right in the valley of the V8. This unusual placement helps protect it from heat and dirt, but it's not where you'd expect to find it on most engines. Thanks for pointing that out!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @samupk
      @samupk 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 It's really not a bolt stretch problem but sheared threads in the block.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samupk Thank you for bringing up such an important detail! You're spot on - sheared threads in the block can definitely be a culprit rather than just bolt stretch. It’s a critical issue, especially with engines like the Northstar, where thread failures can lead to more serious problems like head gasket failures. This is why proper torque and thread integrity are key to long-term performance. If anyone has experienced this with their Northstar or any other engine, we'd love to hear your stories!

    • @BillLaBrie
      @BillLaBrie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Toyota V8’s have it there as well.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BillLaBrie You're absolutely right! Toyota's V8 engines have gained a reputation for reliability and performance over the years, particularly in their Land Cruisers and Tundras. The 1UZ-FE, for example, was a game-changer in the 90s with its smooth power delivery and durability, often being swapped into performance builds. While it's a bit different from American muscle, Toyota definitely showed how to create a robust V8! But hey, what do you all think? Any Toyota V8s out there in your garage, or are you sticking to good ol' American power? Let us know in the comments! And don't forget to share this video, subscribe to Muscle Car Masters, and hit that notification bell so you don't miss any updates...

  • @KeithGreene-k1v
    @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    It's crazy how some of these engines had so much potential but were ruined by poor design choices. The Triumph V8, for instance, could have been a classic if they had just ironed out those cooling issues. It’s a shame!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @mikecyanide7492
      @mikecyanide7492 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wtf do u mean?! Did you .iss the asinine head studs? Not to mention. They skipped half the real problems. That's a classic boat anchor and nothing more lol

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikecyanide7492 Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikecyanide7492 😁😁😁 thank you....

    • @mikecyanide7492
      @mikecyanide7492 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KeithGreene-k1v I know right

  • @94520shatto
    @94520shatto 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Government designed engines have given us any vehicle using a certain engine that should not be bought, diesels that no longer last and, your interesting video is about engines out of production for decades but not the garbage destroying the automotive market today.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for your comment! You make a strong point about the impact of government regulations on engine design today. There's no doubt that modern restrictions have pushed some manufacturers into making engines that prioritize emissions over longevity, especially with diesels. Our focus on older engines is a way to celebrate the craftsmanship and innovation of the past, but you're right-there's plenty to discuss about the challenges modern engines face due to regulations. We might dive into that topic in a future video! Appreciate your feedback.

    • @dom3827
      @dom3827 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Even considering all modern engines. Literarly all of them still are better than the shown once. Even the worst constructed of today.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dom3827 While modern engines have come a long way in terms of efficiency, emissions, and reliability, it's important to remember that many older engines set the foundation for today's technology. Some of those classics, despite their flaws, were groundbreaking for their time and still hold value for their simplicity, power, and tunability. Not to mention, modern engines often come with complex electronics and emissions equipment that can be challenging to work with outside a dealership. So, it's a balance between progress and respecting what came before.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @timberwolfdtproductions3890
    @timberwolfdtproductions3890 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    The Blues Brothers clip was great; one of the best movies of all time!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @west_park7993
      @west_park7993 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      a group of mechanics worked for a month on this car to rig the car so everything falls apart at the same moment. yes, falling apart was real.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@west_park7993 thank you so much...
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @CookeZachery
      @CookeZachery หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      While "Displacement on Demand" (DoD) is indeed the official term, it’s essential to clarify that the lifter issue is actually a common problem directly related to the DoD system itself. The lifters, tasked with deactivating cylinders, often wear out faster in engines with this feature. This has led to various reliability concerns, especially in high-mileage engines where lifter failure impacts overall engine performance.

    • @timberwolfdtproductions3890
      @timberwolfdtproductions3890 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@CookeZachery Thanks for that. Not surprising that problems emerge as a result of trying to force an engine to do something it was never meant to.

  • @brianbumgardner8704
    @brianbumgardner8704 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Lucas electronics is why the British drink warm beer.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @BELCAN57
      @BELCAN57 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Their motto: "Lucas -
      Prince of Darkness"

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@BELCAN57 Thank you for your comment.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @NCF8710
      @NCF8710 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I remember the joke. Q: Why do the British drink warm beer?
      A: Lucas makes their refrigerators.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@NCF8710 Thank you for your feedback.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.

  • @minnesotatomcat
    @minnesotatomcat 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    My grandpa had several of those Olds diesels over the years and every single one went to shit on him but he loved them anyways. He was an old farmer and I’m guessing he liked that diesel sound and when they blew up I’m guessing you could pick up another one pretty cheap as nobody wanted them anymore.
    Edit: he loved them so much that at his funeral my dad and his siblings pryed one of the “Diesel” emblems off the back of his car and put it in the breast pocket of his suit coat to take with him.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.

    • @desertbob6835
      @desertbob6835 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@minnesotatomcat He probably "loved them," because he was fueling them with "ag diesel", thus not paying the road taxes levied on automotive diesel. Other than that, the Olds diesels were a disaster.

  • @broeheemed32
    @broeheemed32 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    The Ford 5.4 2V spark plug issue can be mostly solved by torquing the plugs to 25 ft lbs (use no thread lock).

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great for us and all fans too.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.

    • @davidkilts1670
      @davidkilts1670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Be gentle. Too little the spark plug flies. Too much the park plug flies and takes the threads with! Very frustrating!

    • @williamwhite9767
      @williamwhite9767 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I owned two of those, a 2000 5.4 and a 2002 5.4. Both lasted at least 170,000 miles with no blowouts. Torque the plugs enough and they don't blow. The factory spec was 12 ft lbs which was too low considering they only had 4 or 5 threads. A team of Ford techs got together and torqued those plugs up to 100 ft lbs without pulling out the threads. they recommended 28 ft lbs for the plugs.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@williamwhite9767 thank you so much...
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @bradmckay7439
      @bradmckay7439 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank god someone else uses their brain out there👍🏻 5.4 spark plug issues are self induced🤷🏼‍♂️

  • @Jody-kt9ev
    @Jody-kt9ev 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +56

    You missed the famous for failure Chevy Vega engine from the 1970s.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @ronhall3686
      @ronhall3686 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      2.3 liter aluminum block with sleeve liners and a cast iron head 4 cylinder offered in the Vega and Monza. Massive oil consumption and coolant issues. The running joke was to add the oil and check the gas before starting up. The first VW Rabbits starting in 1975 with the 1.7 liter 4 cylinder also had massive oil consumption issues.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ronhall3686 Wow....That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @Jody-kt9ev
      @Jody-kt9ev 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ronhall3686 I had understood that the Vega engine did not have steel sleeve liners. That was one the issues with it. Also, I had read that using an iron head on the aluminum block was an issue.

    • @AdelynDodson
      @AdelynDodson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Good catch! The Chevy Vega engine definitely had its share of issues, particularly with its aluminum block and overheating problems. It's a great example of how ambitious designs don't always pan out as expected. Thanks for pointing that out!

  • @elhanson5426
    @elhanson5426 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    We had a'81 Caprice diesel daily driver. +300K miles, 44 mpg, kept it 7 years. Only had to replace the injector pump and starter.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, that's impressive! It's great to hear about a Caprice diesel hitting over 300K miles with minimal issues. Shows how durable those engines can be with proper care. That kind of fuel efficiency is almost unheard of today, especially in a full-sized car! What was it like driving it as a daily?

    • @robertmaybeth3434
      @robertmaybeth3434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, IDK. Are you sure the owner might not had it fixed a few times that you weren't aware of? Those things were time bombs from the jump, any diesel engine with too few head bolts and 2 bolt mains, is an engine whose days are numbered, unfortunately

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertmaybeth3434 Thank you for your comment.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @elhanson5426
      @elhanson5426 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertmaybeth3434 My father bought it new in August 1981, only owner, changed the oil regularly, the heads were never off, all repairs done by the dealer we bought it from. We also operated it as a diesel should be and not as a hot rod. Some were bombs, but ours was a jewel.

  • @MrTheHillfolk
    @MrTheHillfolk 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    9:39 Lucas electrics,the original prince of darkness

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes love it....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @snowrocket
      @snowrocket 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      A great joke: Why do the English drink warm beer? Because they have Lucas refrigerators.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@snowrocket Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ah, Lucas electrics-the bane of many classic car enthusiasts! They sure knew how to keep things interesting. It's almost like they believed in building character through unexpected roadside repairs

    • @robertmaybeth3434
      @robertmaybeth3434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LOLOL plenty of mechanics surely suspected black magic and witch-craft were at work, the way Lucas electrics tended to fail at the worst of times.

  • @williamwhite9767
    @williamwhite9767 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    This list should include one of the worst, if not the worst, the Chevy Vega engine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @davekeller2798
      @davekeller2798 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Don't forget the Corvair

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davekeller2798 Thanks for bringing up the Corvair! It’s definitely a unique piece of Chevrolet history, known for its rear-engine design and the controversy surrounding its handling. While not a muscle car, it had its own charm and following. It’s always great to remember these less conventional models!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @danielelliott3659
      @danielelliott3659 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The vega was a pretty good engine once you put steel sleeves in them

    • @williamwhite9767
      @williamwhite9767 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 A turbocharged version of the Corvair was available for a while. I test drove a used one. It ran okay but definitely not that impressive in performance.

  • @rediz4rubes
    @rediz4rubes 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    "The Ford F one hundred and fifty truck" was dead giveaway Mr robo. LOL!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @rctopfueler2841
      @rctopfueler2841 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dori armeggatto or whatever the hell styxx says lol

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rctopfueler2841 thank you so much...
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @account4info
      @account4info 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      One thousand nine hundred seventies was another clue.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@account4info yeah, thank you so much for your feedback...
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @haircut2015
    @haircut2015 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I have a 2005 buick la cross with the 3.6 with 157,000.0 miles and it run great & is fast....it is still running Because we change the oil every 3k !!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @starxlr7863
      @starxlr7863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      These are some great V6 engines regardless of what others might say about them. I really love how powerful and quick they are and to include the fuel efficiency. Proper maintenance goes a long way and sadly many people do not follow this advice!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@starxlr7863 absolutely right! V6 engines often get overshadowed by V8s, but many modern V6s offer an impressive balance of power, speed, and fuel efficiency. Proper maintenance is key, and when people skip out on that, they miss out on the engine's full potential. Those who take care of their V6 engines are often rewarded with longevity and performance that can easily rival larger engines.

  • @robertmaybeth3434
    @robertmaybeth3434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    The GM diesels @06:44 were a typical example of GM's myopic design process. Designing a diesel engine was not in itself a bad idea, of course. But to make them, GM did what they always do: they cut corners and used dubious design shortcuts, simply to save costs.
    A diesel engine must be rugged enough to reliably hold piston compression of up to 500 psi, (more than twice the compression in a similar gasoline engine, of around 180-200 psi). A proper diesel engine can't simply be made from a gasoline one, because significant modifications must be done to the engine to make it robust enough.
    For starters, the engineers should have added on several more cylinder head bolts just to hold that doubled compression. And the main bearing caps needed to be strengthened from 2-bolt to 4-bolt. GM engineers knew that to make a proper diesel engine would at a minimum require an all-new engine block design... but GM didn't want to spend the money. Rather than do it right, GM corporate types decided just to do it over, later- when some other guy was at the helm of GM!
    So GM just released their poorly designed engines and let owners do the product testing. And when the unfortunate owners returned with their shoddy diesel cars in the thousands, to GM dealerships howling in protest, GM decided to let recalls fix the rest. The unfortunate owners were left to pick up the pieces - with most vowing never to trust GM again!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great for us and all fans too.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @user-wy1dl2me2p
      @user-wy1dl2me2p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 For sure GM has rolled the dice way too many times for me speaking of my 2.2 litre GMC Sonoma nice pickup but the crappiest 4 cyl outside of Vega.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-wy1dl2me2p I can totally relate to that! GM has had its share of dicey moments, and it seems like their 4-cylinders have often been hit or miss. Your experience with the 2.2L in the Sonoma really echoes what a lot of folks felt about the Vega too. It's a shame when a solid vehicle like the Sonoma gets let down by a subpar engine. Here's hoping GM learns from these missteps.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @user-wy1dl2me2p
      @user-wy1dl2me2p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 Thank you , will do . 2.2 never overheated , blown head gasket at 90 k and later around 100 k cracked head 🤯 the truck looked good though . Fixed and resold .

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-wy1dl2me2p Glad to hear you were able to fix and resell . It's a shame about the blown head gasket and cracked head, especially considering the 2.2's reputation for being reliable. It’s always a bit of a gamble with these things, but at least the truck looked good! Thanks for sharing your experience.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @robertbowers9856
    @robertbowers9856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I'm 80 years old and I've stayed with small block Chevies my entire career.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @davidkilts1670
      @davidkilts1670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You betchca! Great engines and nobody can honestly say otherwise. So far even the later 5.7 Vortec my 1996 Yukon (328,000 Mi) and the 6.0 Ho Vortec in my AWD Escalade (201,000mi) have been great. I put Iridium spark plugs in the Yukon after it went over 300,000 when I did the last tune up because I thought it deserved them! Oil changes at 3000mi. I have owned 3 Chevelles, K and C Series pick ups and still have a 1989 1 ton 454 that is at about 100,000 mi. All are ready to go.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidkilts1670 Yes.... It was so great when we got your information to us and all enthusiasts too.
      That is super important information for our channel, spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @Iconoclasher
      @Iconoclasher 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertbowers9856 I put a new crate 350 in my 54 Nash Ambassador. I did have to redefine the word "shoehorn" to get it in. I would have rather stayed with the original OHV 6 but getting parts for the thing is almost impossible now.
      I'll admit it is a pretty impressive engine.

    • @robertbowers9856
      @robertbowers9856 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Iconoclasher / That is ironic you should say that about your 54 Nash Ambassador! I got a 62 Rambler Station Wagon, sometime about 1965, with an aluminum engine that went to crap right after buying it. It smoked like I was burning wood instead of gas! I put a 283 small block in it about 1966, from the junk yard, but when I put 3-2 barrel carbs, with progressive linkage, a valve broke and destroyed it. A friend of mine called and asked if I wanted his 283 because he was converting his wife's car to a six, you can imagine what I said.(Chevys cost about used $125 then) Later on, I bought a Jaguar XKE and gave the car to my mom and she loved going to the gas station to see the attendant's faces after checking the oil!! The engine was red and chrome valve covers and 3-2's with Chrome air scoops and red inside them, and red fuel lines. I painted the first engine blue to match the car, but with the new engine I went to red because people asked when did Rambler use a V-8 ? I now have a 78 Trans Am, or I should say my wife does. It's an everyday driver, that I put a 350 crate motor in and it is a fine fit!

  • @billvose7360
    @billvose7360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    We bought a new 1978 Delta 88 Royale from our local dealer (who I think ordered what I had talked to them about) It had larger tires (police package), no vinyl top and pretty well loaded on most options such as cruise, semi-automatic climate control, power seat, windows etc. We drove that car, until our son, who was a year old when we bought it was driving it and hit a car turning left at a red light on a major road, he was 17 at that time. I had put a 1983 engine in afther the original broke the crank in the 5-6 rod journal. It was replaced by a 1980 Pontiac Bonneville Brogham Diesel I bought from a co-worker.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @dennisjohnson8840
      @dennisjohnson8840 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What about the Dodge And Jeep 3.6 liters engines and cam problems???

    • @billvose7360
      @billvose7360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dennisjohnson8840 Don't know much about them, never had one. I did have a couple of the Mitsubishi built 3.0 liter V6s, the ones the valveguides would come loose on. Liquid Nitrogen (Courtesy of NASA Langley) and a gas grille. Heat the heads on the grille for a bit while the new guides with retaining rings chill in the LN2. They almost fall in after that.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dennisjohnson8840 Thank you for your information.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @thesandero2454
    @thesandero2454 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Ohhh,brother....if inly you knew about all the modern small engines to vehicles fitted in many new cars today that are even worse than any of the engines featured. It is insane and the cost to fix is madness. Many engines can't be rebuild,only replaced. Most engines won't even reach 60k miles without major issieus.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're absolutely right! The modern small engines in many new cars have some serious issues, especially with longevity and repair costs. It's frustrating to see engines designed in a way that makes them nearly impossible to rebuild, forcing expensive replacements. The technology might be advancing, but it's hard to ignore that some of these engines are barely hitting 60k miles before facing major problems. It makes you miss the days when engines were built to last and could be fixed without breaking the bank!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @NoName-ky6ze
    @NoName-ky6ze หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonder how bad American engines are when not a single French or Italian engine is on this list...

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great observation! American engines have a reputation for brute power, but they've definitely had their share of challenges too-durability, fuel efficiency, and occasional design quirks, especially during emissions control changes in the ‘70s and ‘80s. European and Italian engines, like those from Ferrari or Lamborghini, have often prioritized refinement, precision, and high-rev performance, which makes them excel in very different ways. While American muscle cars pushed massive V8s for sheer power, Italian and French engines approached performance with smaller displacements and advanced tuning, which resulted in lighter, more agile cars-perfect for twisting European roads.
      But that’s the charm of American muscle, right? The focus was always on raw power and affordable performance. It’s fascinating to compare these different philosophies. Do you think American engines missed out by not borrowing more from European engineering, or is that brute-force approach what defines muscle cars?
      Everyone, we’d love to hear your take on this-drop your thoughts in the comments! And if you’re enjoying these deep dives into muscle car history, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep the American Muscle Car conversations going...

  • @rogerweiss8714
    @rogerweiss8714 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    My 97 Northstar Elderado was the best car i ever owned. 250k absolutely no issues until I blew the transmission doing something stupid. I did have to make some mods, but the costs were minimal. This was a great car for an engineer, but not a non-technical person. The thing was like 747 on the highway.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @haircut2015
      @haircut2015 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What did u do to kill it...??

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@haircut2015 Thank you for your comment.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @quietv
    @quietv 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    The Cadillac 4-6-8 engine was fine. All you had to do was unplug a wire on the transmission to disable the 4-6-8 system and it ran on all 8 just fine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      While disabling the 4-6-8 system by unplugging a wire might have worked as a temporary fix, it’s important to remember that the Cadillac 4-6-8 engine's issues were more than just a simple wiring problem. The system had significant design and reliability challenges that affected its overall performance and longevity. Many owners found that the complexity of the system led to more frequent repairs and maintenance issues, even if the engine could run on all eight cylinders with a workaround.

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@KeithGreene-k1v : Nope, you're incorrect. The V864 was just aftermarket add-on junk from Eaton. Once this was bypassed, it reverted to the same 368 TBI used in the 1980 Eldorado. The engine and EFI were reliable and the EFI was used on a variety of GM products through 1995.

    • @lucarastetter1376
      @lucarastetter1376 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In my opinion the 864 is not that bad. I bought an 84 model some years ago with the HT4100. It still works but being designed like that i sometimes wonder why i drove it to italy with no problems. Wow that Engine just holds together by hopes and prayers

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lucarastetter1376 I completely get where you're coming from! The 8-6-4 system might have been controversial, but it’s not all bad. I also bought an '84 model with the HT4100, and honestly, despite its reputation, it still runs. I drove mine to Italy without any issues, which is pretty impressive considering its design. Sure, the engine feels like it's held together by hopes and prayers at times, but there’s something to be said for it just holding up! With proper maintenance and a little care, these engines can surprise you. Sometimes it's more about the overall experience and nostalgia than chasing perfection.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @flashgordon3715
    @flashgordon3715 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What is the bell sound for?

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....We are very happy to know that...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @charleservin5946
    @charleservin5946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    My dad owned a junkyard in the 70s and 80s,we had probably had thirty or forty Olds 350 engines,we couldn't sell.They seemed to be bulletproof,then they came out with the Olds diesel.Soon we had sold out of the gas 350 and started to have to order engines from other yards

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your story.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @haircut2015
      @haircut2015 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The management at GM where / are idiots for the junk they have sold over the years....

    • @ronaldbreth3440
      @ronaldbreth3440 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had the Olds diesel 260,000 no problem people didn't know how to take care of them

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ronaldbreth3440 Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @MrSteve280
    @MrSteve280 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I've owned almost thirty cars, including two with engines covered here. The VW flat four was worse than any of these. I owned four VWs (3 Bettles and a Camper Van) and had to replace engines in three of them for a variety of reasons. Although relatively cheap and simple to do, definitely a most failed engine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @hillbilly3331
      @hillbilly3331 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I will have to disagree with you about that bro.their simplicity was a dream and a 2bbl carb and a cam from jc Whitney would raise the front tires on a beetle.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@hillbilly3331 Thank you for your opinion
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @DanghettiTV
    @DanghettiTV หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I drive a Fiat 4 cylinder 1 liter Fire engine. It cost less than 800 dollars to replace all engine parts, and 20 years later the parts are still being made by off brand factories. And it's faster than walking.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for sharing your experience with the Fiat 1-liter FIRE engine! That little workhorse is known for its durability and efficiency - a real testament to Italian engineering in a small package. The FIRE engine, especially with its widespread availability of parts even after 20 years, has earned quite a reputation for keeping people on the road without breaking the bank.
      While it's no muscle car, you've definitely highlighted something important: cars that keep running and don't drain your wallet have their own appeal. The same goes for classic American muscle, where fans keep engines roaring decades later with parts still available - sometimes thanks to the aftermarket community!
      If you’re interested in muscle cars and enjoy talking engines, we’d love to see more comments, shares, and subscriptions from folks like you on the Muscle Car Masters channel. Let’s get a conversation going - what's your dream car if you ever decided to go for something with a bit more horsepower?

  • @SteamEngine-zn1kl
    @SteamEngine-zn1kl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Incoming "ding" Me : Outgoing "bye""

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @Dont_Gnaw_on_the_Kitty_1
      @Dont_Gnaw_on_the_Kitty_1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MuscleCarMasters68LOL

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Dont_Gnaw_on_the_Kitty_1 Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @Maximus20778
      @Maximus20778 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MuscleCarMasters68 This comment feels automated

  • @BrooklynBounce
    @BrooklynBounce 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m a new subscriber. I enjoyed your video and you have a great voice

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @bimmerhuncho908
    @bimmerhuncho908 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    2.4l GDI Hyundai engine disasters too

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for bringing up the 2.4L GDI Hyundai engine! This engine has certainly sparked discussions due to some reliability issues, particularly with the Theta II engine family. Many owners have faced problems with premature engine wear, oil consumption, and even engine failures. Hyundai had to address several recalls for models equipped with this engine, especially as certain years saw high rates of engine knocking and metal debris accumulation, which could lead to serious breakdowns.
      A major issue lies in the high-pressure direct injection system (GDI), which, while improving fuel efficiency, can sometimes lead to carbon buildup in the intake valves. This buildup can cause misfires, reduced performance, and even complete engine failure if not addressed. Hyundai's response has included warranties and recall programs, but it’s been a learning curve for the industry regarding the balance of performance and long-term reliability in smaller displacement engines with GDI technology.
      For everyone tuning in, if you’ve had experiences with the 2.4L GDI or similar engines, share them with us! We love hearing your stories and insights about engine challenges and fixes. Remember to comment, share, and subscribe to the Muscle Car Masters Channel for more deep dives and community discussions on all things engines and American muscle!

  • @franknorwood7262
    @franknorwood7262 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I was given a’79 Cadillac Seville that had a diesel in it, when I got it, it had a blown head gasket and only 8k miles on it. I found a set of copper head gaskets and changed the head bolts to harden steel. I never had a problem with that motor and put over 200k on it.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s an impressive run, especially considering the reputation of the diesel in those Sevilles! Switching to copper head gaskets and hardened steel bolts seems like a smart solution. It’s great to hear you got over 200k miles out of it after the modifications-proof that with the right adjustments, even engines with challenging reputations can go the distance!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @danr1920
    @danr1920 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Get a real voice. "1970's". Fail. Also we don't say F150 the way your bot does. You included the Triumph that sold like 100. But the 1971 -1974 Vega engine is skipped.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day,
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.

    • @robertmaybeth3434
      @robertmaybeth3434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I bought one of these! Around 1980 I was in service in Wichita, Kansas. A 1971 GT that cost me $1,000. Drove it home when I got discharged, 1,600 miles to California. Engine r main bearing seal leaked so I spent all my discharge money on changing the engine myself. I bought a remanuf long block that they told me had sleeved cylinders installed. I drove that car for the next 8 years and except for one fuel pump, it never gave me a lick of trouble.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertmaybeth3434 Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @GLHS592
    @GLHS592 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Northstar could have been a great engine. It is a great design (except starter location) that was hurt by inadequate head bolts. They are tiny bolts with fine threads in an aluminum block. There's a fix that uses coarse threaded studs and much better head gaskets. They are bulletproof with this fix. It's kinda expensive and I hear it's a big job.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You’re absolutely right! The Northstar had a lot of potential, and its design was ahead of its time in many ways. But yeah, those head bolts were a real weak point. Fine threads in aluminum were just asking for trouble when it came to heat cycles. The stud fix, with coarse threads, really does solve the problem and, paired with better head gaskets, makes it almost indestructible. It’s a shame GM didn’t address that in production, but you’re right again-it’s not a cheap or easy fix. If someone’s committed to the Northstar, though, it’s worth the effort to make it bulletproof!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @GLHS592: Northstar was a great engine. The starter is a 20 year part which is basically the service life of the whole car

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill While the Northstar engine had its strengths, like impressive power and smooth performance, it wasn't without its issues. Many owners dealt with head gasket failures and oil leaks as the engine aged, which could lead to costly repairs. The starter being a 20-year part is solid, but other parts of the Northstar engine often didn't match that longevity. For some, the maintenance costs eventually outweighed the benefits of the engine’s design. Still, when everything was running well, it offered a great driving experience!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @CookeZachery
      @CookeZachery 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill No. While some owners have had good experiences with its performance and longevity, others might point out the well-documented issues like head gasket failures, oil leaks, and overheating. It’s true that the starter, located under the intake, was designed to last a long time, but for many, the other maintenance headaches often overshadow that durability. Still, for those who maintained the engine well, the Northstar could serve them well for the full life of the vehicle. What was your experience with it?

  • @sypoth
    @sypoth 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You missed the ENTIRE line of Toyota R series engines often found in their Hilux and Sr5 family from the late 70s to the early 80s. They're were two models of engines the R20 and the R22. One had a faulty timing chain that would lead to misfiring and eventually an engine that would crank but never run, the other was poorly cast and the coolant passages were inadequate leading to over heating warped engines, and blown gaskets. These engines typically had a 3k mile lifespan if you were lucky, were never recalled, and for the most part no longer exist as most of the vehicles that ran them either got crushed, were replaced with other engines from other brands, became the victim of some mysterious circumstance that left it beyond repair, or was wheeled into a field somewhere to be forgotten which is the only reason any of them still exist.
    Toyota knew of the defects and refused to replace them forcing anyone who owned one to eat the cost. I spent far too many hours of my childhood on the side of the road because of this engine and it's one of the key events in my life that have cemented Toyota to the label of Junk for me.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing your experience with the Toyota R-series engines! I appreciate your insight into the issues with the R20 and R22 engines, especially regarding the timing chain and cooling system flaws. It’s unfortunate that Toyota didn’t address those problems back then, and I can see why it left such a lasting impact on your opinion of the brand. Stories like yours remind us how critical reliability is and how a bad experience can shape views for a lifetime. It’s definitely a part of automotive history that shouldn’t be overlooked.
      BTW, That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @Vfh........y
      @Vfh........y 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I never knew about that Toyota problem but I have had a lot of Toyota trucks and never had any issues.... of course all mine were 1990 or better so I don't know about the really old ones of course the new turbocharged V6 in the tundra that's going to be a whole nother issue

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Vfh........y
      Thanks for sharing your experience! It makes sense that you haven’t had issues with your '90s and later Toyota trucks-they have a great reputation for reliability. As for the older models, they did have some quirks, but Toyota really hit their stride in the '90s. And you're right about the new turbocharged V6 in the Tundra-it’ll be interesting to see how that engine holds up in the long run. Turbo engines can be a mixed bag when it comes to longevity, especially in trucks. Time will tell!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @radzer0966
    @radzer0966 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The GM 3.6 timing chain issue still happens on the brand new models. They didn’t fix anything just changed operating parameters.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much, That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @kennethross786
    @kennethross786 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I steered clear of the GM high-feature V6 in 2022, opting instead for a car powered by the legendary Buick 3800 Series III V6. Even after they fixed the timing chains in 2012, the 3.6L V6 had weak water pumps that are prone to failure and the electrical system isn't the best. And the Ford SOHC 5.4L Triton V8's well-deserved inclusion on this list only applies to the 3 valve version. The non-VVT 2 valve SOHC 5.4L Triton V8 is almost bulletproof.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WOWW....It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @markrowland1366
    @markrowland1366 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    People often talk about how bad and unreliable their cars are, to whomever they bought it from. I listened to a rich man tearing strips off a Bently dealer. Our neighbour bought a top Mercedes only to drive his wife's Triumph half the time. I owned six Volvos but their maintainance was easy and far between.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @robertmaybeth3434
      @robertmaybeth3434 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've seen how Bentleys are constructed and the sorts of components used, and to me it's no surprise RR and Bentley are number one on the least reliable car list consistently.
      All the money charged for the Bentley is where the owner can see it: it's in the hand-applied paint, the rich interior, fine leather, genuine exotic wood, etc. Meanwhile the automotive portion of the cars are nothing special, really not even as good as a Toyota, and a place where Bentley cuts every corner to save money - despite charging more than a house for their wildly over-priced car.

    • @jamesigou9033
      @jamesigou9033 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Don’t knock Toyota’s, they’ve always been extremely reliable.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      While it’s important to consider various perspectives, I think it’s worth noting that Toyota vehicles are renowned for their reliability. It might be helpful to acknowledge their track record for dependability in the discussion.
      Thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @89Interceptor
    @89Interceptor 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    tells you about an engine, shows you a completely different engine

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @masjuggalo
    @masjuggalo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Cadillac 864 isn't a bad engine, it's just the cylinder deactivation crap. If you bypass that and make it a V8 all the time it works great. Ide like to boost a olds 5.7 diesel (The reason Americans don't like diesel cars) until it blew its rods out the bottom end. The standard practice for fixing a Jaguar has been to put a Chevy small block in it for a long time. Guy literally made a Hope publishing company around it.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you for your information. It is so great for us and all enthusiasts too.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars

  • @jamiealexander9450
    @jamiealexander9450 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So does it have all the engines with the afm technology?

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      AFM (Active Fuel Management) technology is available on specific engine models, mainly in GM's V8 lineup. It's not found in all engines, but it's featured in engines like the 5.3L and 6.2L V8s in certain trucks and SUVs. If you're referring to a particular vehicle, let me know, and I can provide more details on which engines include AFM
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @clwomble
    @clwomble 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I had a ‘80 Olds 98. Put 200K miles on it. Minimal maintenance. Always started and ran fine. 0 to 60 time of…..well, I’ll let you know when it gets there.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @Chris_Troxler
      @Chris_Troxler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂😂

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Chris_Troxler Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      It is important information for us to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @chrisrumble2665
    @chrisrumble2665 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Kind of appropriate that a video about poorly built engines should be so poorly produced...

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the feedback! We’re always striving to improve both content and production quality. If there's something specific you'd like to see us do better, feel free to share-your input helps us get better with each video!
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @markkramer7068
    @markkramer7068 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I didn't see anyone commenting on the HT4100 cady motor . In the livery business we just waited for it to go and replaced it with a 350 Olds motor .we'd get about 100 thousand miles out of the 4100 with timely maintenance then pull it.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @AdelynDodson
      @AdelynDodson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Interesting point! The HT4100 was definitely a challenge for Cadillac, and it’s not surprising that you found the 350 Olds motor to be a more reliable alternative. It’s fascinating how different engines have different lifespans and practicalities in the livery business. Thanks for sharing your experience!

    • @markkramer7068
      @markkramer7068 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @AdelynDodson Olds matched up better to Cady cars then other GM motors. We'd have to do a lot more rigging with other GM motors.

    • @AdelynDodson
      @AdelynDodson 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@markkramer7068 Absolutely, Olds engines often had a better fit with Cadillacs compared to other GM motors. Their design and engineering seemed to align more smoothly with Cadillac's requirements, reducing the need for extensive modifications. It's interesting to see how the integration of different GM engines varied based on their specific characteristics and intended applications

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 350 Olds must have been a more reliable choice for your fleet. Thanks for sharing your insights!

  • @sparkplug1018
    @sparkplug1018 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It has always amused me when people exclaim how expensive maintaining and repairing the Jaguar V12 is.
    At what point has anyone thought that maintaining a V12 would be cheap? Is there literally any other V12 on the market that is cheap to maintain?
    That being said, upgrade the cooling system, engine wiring and fuel lines, and do all the maintenance and they aren't bad at all. Unless somehow you're thinking that just because you bought the car for a few thousand it should be Honda cheap to repair, if so you're hopeless.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @aaronfarr4753
      @aaronfarr4753 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Meanwhile Packard had a V-12 in the 1930’s that was absolutely fantastic and not terrible to maintain.

    • @sparkplug1018
      @sparkplug1018 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@aaronfarr4753 True, Ford and GM also had 8 cylinders in the 30’s which were much easier to maintain than their modern counterparts.
      Granted yes Jaguar could have done some things better, but at no point do the words “v12” and “cheap/easy to maintain” go in the same sentence

    • @aaronfarr4753
      @aaronfarr4753 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@sparkplug1018 yeah that little flathead ford V-8 that came out in 1932 was a real world beater. They went straight from a 40 horse 4 cylinder in the model A to a single casting (something considered impossible with the technology of the time) V-8 of 65hp. And that same engine although increased to 100hp stayed in the line up into the 1950’s. That’s the thing people forget though comparing old engines to new ones is the elegant simplicity of the old ones. Most of them being flatheads and much easier to work on and less troublesome. They also forget that they didn’t last as long either because they had babbeted bearings instead of the modern inserts and due to that coupled with the metallurgy of the time+ oil and fuel quality or lack thereof they needed frequent valve jobs and overhauls. Back then a car that was driven 80-100,000 miles was not just rare but almost unheard of because by the time they hit 60-70,000 miles everything on them was pretty well whipped, completely worn out and ready for the scrapyard.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@aaronfarr4753 Thank you for your information. It is so great for us and fans too.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @TairnKA
    @TairnKA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Do you know why the British drink the beer warm?
    They have Lucas refrigerators. ;-D

    • @ProtoType99468
      @ProtoType99468 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      🍺 old joke brother 🍻

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thank you for your feedback...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      See you next time.

    • @TairnKA
      @TairnKA 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@ProtoType99468 but still funny. ;-D

    • @ProtoType99468
      @ProtoType99468 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@TairnKA loved that joke when a motorcycle mech said that the guys who did british motorcyle wiring also did the fridges 😅

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @TairnKA @ProtoType99468 Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.

  • @hkonhelgesen
    @hkonhelgesen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    SAAB planned a V8 car. As the answer to the Volvo 164. The planned was to stuff the Triumph Stag engine into the SAAB 99. But they could never the engines problems. They gave up. And built a turbo on their 2-liter 4-cylinder in stead. The SAAB turbo is now a great classic.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great point about SAAB’s V8 ambitions! It’s interesting that they considered using the Triumph Stag engine, which, as we know, had its share of reliability issues. Ultimately, it was probably a blessing in disguise that they pivoted to their turbocharged 4-cylinder. The SAAB turbo became iconic and played a huge role in their legacy. It’s fascinating how setbacks like engine problems can sometimes lead to breakthroughs!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @e46m54nissansr20937
    @e46m54nissansr20937 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Im a BMW inline 6 turbo guy but Im weird Ive always been interested in GM high feature V6s and VQs.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for sharing! You're not weird at all-those GM High Feature V6s and Nissan VQs are seriously underrated! GM’s High Feature V6 engines, like the LY7 or the LF3 in the Cadillac CTS Vsport, pack a punch with their direct injection and turbocharging. They blend power with efficiency and have shown up in everything from luxury Cadillacs to sports cars. The VQ, on the other hand, is Nissan’s legendary workhorse. It’s known for its durability, high-revving capability, and smooth power delivery-definitely one of the best V6 families around!
      For everyone else, what do you think? Share your thoughts on these engines, or let us know your favorite underrated powerplants! Don't forget to comment, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more awesome engine deep dives!

  • @Patrick-xd8jv
    @Patrick-xd8jv 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Lots to choose from. Crosly, Vega , Olds diesel ect

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're absolutely right! There are so many fascinating and sometimes overlooked engines to choose from. The Crosley engine was small but mighty, especially given its size-it was actually one of the first American car engines to use an overhead camshaft! The Vega’s aluminum engine had its challenges with cooling and head gasket issues, but it set the stage for innovations in lightweight engine design. And the Oldsmobile Diesel V8? That was a bold experiment in fuel economy, though plagued by reliability issues early on. But with the right modifications, some owners got impressive results out of it!
      Thanks for bringing these up! What’s everyone’s favorite ‘oddball’ engine? Drop a comment below, and let’s keep the conversation going! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into the engines that shaped American muscle history...

  • @ikonix360
    @ikonix360 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Most failed engines?
    Large displacement engines of the 80's that were so smogged up they produced little power.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @user-oh6ze3dq6p
    @user-oh6ze3dq6p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I miss the old "Stove bolt" 6 , 216, 235, 250, used in Chevy cars & trucks!!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Ah, the old "Stovebolt" inline 6 engines-those were workhorses! The 216, 235, and 250 were legendary for their reliability and simplicity. Easy to work on, and they ran forever if you treated them right. Definitely a big part of Chevy’s history! Do you have a favorite among them?

    • @davekeller2798
      @davekeller2798 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@MuscleCarMasters68 OH NO not the 216with babbett bearings ? The rest was good. Loved my 300 H.P. 327 CU.IN.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds like you had a great experience with the 327! That engine definitely packs a punch. As for the 216 with babbitt bearings, it’s definitely a piece of old-school engineering-reliable for its time, but not quite up to the performance level of later engines like the 327. Glad you enjoyed the rest of the build!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @danshobbies13
    @danshobbies13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Only having 1 Chrysler engine and 1 Ford engine surprises me.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @bradmckay7439
      @bradmckay7439 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It shouldn’t, ford and Chrysler have historically produced some of the most reliable, hard running engines around. Not to say gm hasn’t built amazing power plants, but they have their fair share of flops as well.

  • @JimSix-jo6hf
    @JimSix-jo6hf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    good picks, I agree with most of them, but the cadillac 368 (4 6 8 ) engine was good yes the computer was a bit slow , I would give that one a pass and replace it with the Vega 4 aluminum block with no sleeves, like that had any chance!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the feedback! I agree, the Cadillac 368 (V8-6-4) engine had potential but was hampered by that sluggish computer tech. It could’ve been great with faster electronics! As for the Vega 4 aluminum block-yeah, that one was a bit of a disaster waiting to happen. No sleeves in the cylinders led to some serious durability issues. It’s amazing how they thought that design would hold up! Definitely a good call to swap those two out.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @JimSix-jo6hf
      @JimSix-jo6hf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 yes I hit the subscribe button!!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JimSix-jo6hf Awesome! Get ready for more epic content coming your way. Thanks for hitting that subscribe button!

  • @mattmayberry-mt7yy
    @mattmayberry-mt7yy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ive had a couple of these engines. I had two different Cadillacs with the Northstar engine both used oil, would ruin coil packs constantly, develop a vacuum leak to idle rough and starter would fail. Its in valley under the intake so you would have to remove the whole top half of the engine to get to it.
    The other one was the 5.4 triton. This one also eat coil packs, popped plugs randomly, had alternator and starter issues but the big problem was the intake leaking coolant making it run hot and ruining the engine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WOWW....It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Oil consumption was cured by using full synthetic oil, not sure about the coil packs but I've never had one fail, the starter typically last the normal service life of the car bout 20 years with normal use, the vacuum leak was almost always due to using the wrong air filter (the one at the auto parts store is the wrong one). You gotta use an OEM type air filter on this engine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill Thanks for sharing your experience! It’s interesting how switching to full synthetic oil resolved the consumption issue for you-that’s definitely a solid fix for some engines.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @mattmayberry-mt7yy
      @mattmayberry-mt7yy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill I have owned several GM trucks with the 5.3 vortec and never had a coil pack fail but the Northstar is a different design and I've personally replaced 12 different coil packs with new OEM ones. The starter issues on these I believe are from the heat from the engine valley soaks the starter ruining it over time. Vacuum leaks happen where the throttle body meets the intake and the back of the intake is a elbow that will dry rot and leak.

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mattmayberry-mt7yy : That vacuum leak is that seal behind the throttle body getting ruptured. It's caused by using the wrong air filter. The typical part store replacement filter does fit in the aircleaner box, but it's a totally different (and wrong) design from OEM. The coil pack problem was common on a lot of aging GM's. The cause was corrosion on the conductor plate the coil pack sits on. 03 and newer Northstars don't use that old setup. Early Northstars also had crank sensor problems which was also corrected around 03 model year.

  • @dirtthunder1638
    @dirtthunder1638 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Take it from a 30 year Chrysler Tec. The Chrysler 2.7L and 3.2L were two different designs. The 2.7L duel overhead cam run by timing chains. The 3.2L was a pushrod engine. The 3.2L was only offered for 3 years in the LH cars and was dropped for the larger single overhead cam 3.5L. The 3.2L was also used in minivans and Jeeps for over 20 years. The 3.5L and later 4.0L were a great engines and had very little problems. The down fall of the 2.7L was that owners didn't change the oil. It had a 3k mile oil service interval that was necessary do to the low quality oil used at the time. Anything would sledge up if you are going 10K on an oil change on conventional motor oil. If you kept the oil clean you could get 200K out of one.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....thank you so much for your information. It is good for us and all enthusiasts too.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @samarch2189
      @samarch2189 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So the 2.7L had little to do with any other Chrysler engine. It was DOHC 4 valves per cylinder with a timing chain driven water pump.
      The 3.3 & 3.8 were the pushrod engines you speak of.
      The 3.2 & 3.5 were very similar with a timing belt, SOHC driving 4 valves per cylinder through a complex rocker arm arrangement.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@samarch2189 Yes....thank you so much for the information. such a piece of perfect information for us...
      Spending more time with other channels is a good way to explore American Muscle Cars more.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share, or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @account4info
      @account4info 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It was the 3.3 that was the minivan engine, not the 3.2

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@account4info Thank you for your information.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos. Have a great day... see you next time.

  • @cs1-p5e
    @cs1-p5e หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    no Mazda rotary in the list, ergo its a joke

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for the comment! You're absolutely right about the Mazda rotary being a notable omission. The Wankel rotary engine, while innovative and compact, faced challenges that have certainly earned it a controversial reputation. Many enthusiasts feel that its frequent seal issues, high oil consumption, and relatively short lifespan make it one of the most notorious engine blunders in production car history. Although it has a devoted fan base, Mazda struggled with the engine's durability and emissions challenges, especially in the RX-7 and RX-8 models, leading to costly fixes and mixed reviews.
      We’d love to hear from everyone! Let us know what other engines you think should make the list of "most failed" or controversial engines. Share your thoughts, and if you enjoy our content, remember to comment, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Keep those memories and insights alive-thanks for being part of the conversation!

  • @vl639
    @vl639 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve been a mechanic for over 25 years now, that being said I’m still by no means an expert. In my experience I’ve replaced more Ford 5.4 and 4.6s than all other motor combined, most these motors had 70k or less miles.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's some solid experience! It's interesting to hear about your time with the Ford 5.4 and 4.6 engines-those modular V8s have definitely had their fair share of issues. The early timing chain tensioner and cam phaser problems seemed to cause a lot of premature failures, especially in the 5.4. It’s surprising how often they needed replacing despite their relatively low mileage. Ford built a lot of them, but it seems like they never quite solved all the long-term durability problems with those motors, particularly under certain conditions. Do you feel like most of the failures you saw were related to poor maintenance or were they just built with inherent design flaws?
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @LowEnd31st
    @LowEnd31st 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Ht4100 was much worse than the 8-6-4… at least you could disable the 864 and run it as a straight 6.0 fairly reliably.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @Truckman1980
    @Truckman1980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Tne northstar was probably one of the worst engines ever made

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What are your thoughts on how Cadillac might have improved the Northstar's reliability if they had taken a different approach?

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The Northstar was ran 18 model years and was backed with a 5/100 warranty in its waning years. Not bad at all.

    • @Truckman1980
      @Truckman1980 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill complete garbage couldn't keep oil in them extremely expensive to work on. Have to remove the intake just to replace the starter. Head gasket failures. They perform great but we're awful. My uncle had one when you pulled in the carport it would leave huge oil puddles and I think they wanted like $1800 to replace the seal. They were very problematic

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TeeroyHammermill Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @randallfranklin7910
    @randallfranklin7910 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I agree, the Chrysler 2.7L v6 was garbage in the Intrepids, they should of stuck with the 3.5L v6's they had in them in previous years

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you so much. It is so great...
      It is important information for us to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @tomtaylor6028
    @tomtaylor6028 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Have had nightmares of each of them. Including that triumph V8. Replaced hoses on one , had to lift the front of the car to fill the rad, if a distant memory serves

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @briandavis8064
    @briandavis8064 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It was the GM 2.4 and 3.6 not the 2.8. And they've never rectified the problem. Newer 2.4 and 3.6 engines still see the timing chain failure.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're absolutely right that the GM 2.4 and 3.6 engines have a history of timing chain issues. While the 2.8 was also known for some problems, the widespread timing chain failures you're referring to are a significant issue with those 2.4 and 3.6 engines, particularly in the Ecotec and High Feature V6 families. GM has made attempts to improve the situation over the years with updated parts, but unfortunately, it's clear that these issues persist in newer models as well. It's frustrating for anyone dealing with this kind of repeated failure!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @winfriedkloeser3244
    @winfriedkloeser3244 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    At least on the triton there was someone that came up with a solution. But on any engine keep up the oil changes and don’t keep to monitors.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely agree with you! Regular oil changes are crucial for keeping any engine running smoothly, regardless of what the monitors say. It's good to hear that a solution was found for the Triton. Preventive maintenance is always the key to avoiding costly repairs down the road.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @keeponcruisin7876
    @keeponcruisin7876 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I only made it to The Stag. "Placement of the head studs" (goes on to circle a valve stem...)

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @detroit8v715
    @detroit8v715 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Buick 231 v6 is awful. The rods go bad after 100,000 miles due to poor oil pump design. Had an '83 Cutlass and original engine went bad. Replaced it with another one that was used and same thing. Knew other guys who had Cutlass cars from the 70s with this motor, and they all said the same thing, bad rods.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @killabee623
      @killabee623 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Had an 82 Buick Regal with a 231 it was the worst engine. I replaced it 3 times till I finally installed a 76 Chevy 350, problems solved.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@killabee623 Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @LeoKadettTouringCar
    @LeoKadettTouringCar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In Brasil we have issue with VW EA111 1.0liter 4cyl engine in 2012 , they have terrible lubrication problem idling 0.3bar and melting crankshaft with less than 20k km , 80k cars have to return to VW dealer to change engine. They fix half of the problem, after all they fix half the problem but the engine is still susceptible to spinning bearings, as the crankshaft neck is 15mm wider than the connecting rod.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing that insight! It’s unfortunate to hear about the EA111’s lubrication issues in Brazil. The problem of low oil pressure at idle and the resulting crankshaft damage sounds like a serious design flaw. It's interesting that despite VW’s attempt to fix it, the misalignment between the crankshaft and connecting rods is still causing problems, like spinning bearings. This kind of mismatch between parts can lead to premature wear, and it’s no surprise that many of these engines had to be replaced so early. It sounds like the design just didn’t leave much room for error or longevity.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @airborne82nd61
    @airborne82nd61 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Im really surprised that the Chrysler 3.6 V6 isn't on this list. I have had so many of them come through my shop!!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Great point! The Chrysler 3.6 Pentastar V6 is definitely a workhorse and has been in a lot of vehicles. While it’s a solid engine for many, this list was more focused on iconic or game-changing V8s that have made a lasting impact in performance history. But I hear you-those Pentastars are everywhere and have definitely earned a spot in many shops over the years!
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @airborne82nd61
      @airborne82nd61 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 WOW, I never looked at it that way. It's not the fact that it's a bad engine, it's the fact there is so many out there, that's why I see a lot in my shop. Great point!!!

    • @reddyfreddy
      @reddyfreddy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The pentastar engine is a decent engine if you Don't buy a tuner, drag race it, and change oil regularly. The plastic oil cooler is crap and should be replaced when you do the plugs since the upper I take is already off.

    • @airborne82nd61
      @airborne82nd61 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@reddyfreddy Okay, I see. I have never owned one myself. I was just basing it on what's came in my shop. But your right, the oil cooler is a common problem.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@airborne82nd61 @reddyfreddy Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @katskratchkustumz
    @katskratchkustumz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Narrator casually skips over starter replacement in the Northstar, absolutely stupid engineering there

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.

    • @starxlr7863
      @starxlr7863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Too much people harp on this however is really not bad at all and is not the only engine with that design. Replacing the starter is actually very easy and done within an hour. I have a Toyota 4.7L that is exactly the same and look how long that engine was produced.

    • @wildbill6976
      @wildbill6976 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *bmw enters chat*...
      only time I've had to pull an engine to replace a starter...

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wildbill6976 Thank you for your comment.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @TeeroyHammermill
      @TeeroyHammermill 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @starxlr7863: I believe most of the commenters are relying on hearsay rather than actual experience, or they bought some run down heap Northstar from a used car lot or auction. The starter on a Northstar is a 20 year part which is typically the service life of the whole car with normal use.

  • @trentryan27
    @trentryan27 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Another honerable mention: the chevy 3.8 V6, not to be confused with the buick 3800, the chevy 3.8 was an anemic, miserable engine thats not worth owning, my '83 el camino i had in high school had that engine

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Chevy 3.8 V6 was definitely a different beast from the more revered Buick 3800. It lacked the power and reliability that the Buick 3800 was known for, and unfortunately, a lot of people had similar experiences with it being underwhelming. Your '83 El Camino probably would've been a lot more fun with something like the 305 V8 instead!
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

    • @garyshoaf5699
      @garyshoaf5699 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      3800 wasn't anything to crow about. Plastic intake would crack, dumping coolant into the cylinders causing hydraulic lock.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@garyshoaf5699 You're right that the plastic intake manifold on the 3800 Series II engine was a weak spot. The material wasn't ideal for handling the heat and pressure, which could lead to coolant leaks and, in the worst cases, hydrolock. However, aside from that issue, the 3800 was a pretty solid engine in terms of durability, reliability, and fuel economy. When maintained properly, it could easily run for hundreds of thousands of miles. Like many engines, it had its flaws, but the overall package made it a favorite for a lot of GM owners.

  • @AilaniMadden
    @AilaniMadden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Wow, 😁😁😁 I didn't realize how bad the Cadillac V8-6-4 was. It's interesting to see how advanced technology for the time ended up being its downfall. Goes to show that innovation without proper execution can backfire.

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I had no idea the GM 3.6 High Feature Engine had such issues. It’s scary to think a simple timing chain could cause catastrophic engine failure if not properly maintained

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.

    • @samb937
      @samb937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I worked on the Cadillac 8-6-4 and the 3.6 high feature GM engine. There was nothing wrong with the 8-6-4 engine. It was the same engine that Cadillac used for years. The problem lay in the poor electronics and sensors from the late 70's. The 3.6 was junk from the beginning. I can't tell you how many chains and how many cylinder heads I replaced.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samb937 That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @AilaniMadden
      @AilaniMadden 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@samb937 Yes... correct.

  • @JamesSwetland-i8u
    @JamesSwetland-i8u 9 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I wish you would’ve given the years that the engine was bad. For example, I have a 1997 Ford 5.4 L and it’s got almost 200,000 miles on it great engine. But in 2004 to 2008 they were terrible engines

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Thanks for your great comment, @JamesSwetland-i8u
      some engines shine while others have their weak spots. The 1997 Ford 5.4L is a great example of durability, but like you said, the 2004-2008 models had issues, especially with spark plugs and timing chain guides. It’s awesome to hear your 1997 has hit nearly 200,000 miles, true testament to its quality...
      Muscle car fans, what’s your take on the best and worst engines? Share your experiences in the comments, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more deep dives into iconic engines and muscle car history....

  • @Ripsaw17
    @Ripsaw17 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All these flaws on all these engines are from CEOs cutting corners and putting cheap parts in the save a penny here and a penny there rather than making sure that the CEOs don't get paid what they used to get paid because let's face it none of them were worth it all the people that ran the company's back in the seventies eighties and nineties are the destruction of the automotive industry

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      There's certainly a lot to unpack here! You're absolutely right that many engine issues stem from corporate decisions to cut costs. In the '70s, '80s, and '90s, the automotive industry faced massive challenges: stricter emissions regulations, oil crises, and increased competition from imports. CEOs often prioritized cost-saving measures over engineering innovation, resulting in engines like GM's 5.7L Diesel and Cadillac's V8-6-4, which suffered from rushed development and reliability issues.
      However, it wasn't just about corner-cutting; it was also about adapting to rapid change. Companies like Honda and Toyota thrived by focusing on quality and efficiency, setting a tough benchmark.
      What do you all think? Were these failures inevitable, or could they have been avoided with better leadership? Let’s discuss in the comments! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into automotive history...

  • @tomholschbach5966
    @tomholschbach5966 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No mention of the aluminium Chevy vega engine?

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The aluminum Chevy Vega engine was an ambitious design, no doubt! It aimed for weight savings and better fuel efficiency, but unfortunately, its execution left a lot to be desired. The engine suffered from overheating issues and rapid wear due to its lack of a cast iron liner, which led to excessive oil consumption and reliability problems. GM tried to address these with design updates, but the damage to the Vega's reputation had already been done. It’s definitely worth a mention when discussing notable engine designs-both for its innovation and the lessons learned!
      BTW, Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @rctopfueler2841
    @rctopfueler2841 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    We turn them jags into jagrolets out of them with a 350 sbc easily installed ! still a piece of crap, but now it starts and runs every day

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @bmdbigfeet1031
    @bmdbigfeet1031 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Northstar 4.6 wasn't half the engine the 4.4 was. 4.4 (LC3) In the V models has proven to be an extremely reliable engine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so a great story.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @davekeller2798
    @davekeller2798 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Iheard from a Chrysler engineer, that their ptoducts would have been outstanding. TILL THE ACCOUNTING DEPT. GOT IN PLAY !

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's a story that's been echoed by many in the industry! Engineering teams often have bold visions, but once the accountants get involved, cost-cutting tends to take priority over performance and innovation. Chrysler had some great concepts over the years that could have been game-changers if they weren’t constrained by budget decisions. It's a classic struggle between engineering excellence and corporate economics!

  • @Pittaz
    @Pittaz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:14 why are we showing a E-series HSV with an LS2 or LS3 when talking about the 3.6L Alloytec. Also I find statement that the 3.6L Alloytec is one of the ‘most failed engines’ really hard to believe.
    A few know issues yet very reliable with the proper maintenance.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your comment! You're absolutely right to point out the mix-up with the E-series HSV image. It shouldn't have been shown when discussing the 3.6L Alloytec, as the HSV typically ran LS-series V8s, like the LS2 or LS3. That was an error on our part, and we appreciate you bringing it to our attention.
      As for the 3.6L Alloytec engine, while it does have a reputation for reliability with proper maintenance, it's also worth noting that some common issues, like timing chain stretching, oil leaks, and overheating problems, have led to a mixed perception of the engine. Maintenance really does play a key role in keeping them running smoothly, and for many owners, it’s been a solid, reliable performer.
      Thanks again for your feedback, and we’ll make sure to be more precise in the future!

    • @Pittaz
      @Pittaz 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MuscleCarMasters68 Compared to the 3.8L Ecotec in earlier Holden models, which was known for being a tough, reliable workhorse with a simple design, the Alloytec engine was a whole different beast-packed with more electronics and tech. I feel like a lot of owners and mechanics didn’t realize how much more sensitive it was, and it wasn’t as forgiving with missed or delayed services/ low quality fluids.
      Sure, the Alloytec had its known issues, but including it does seem a bit harsh given the circumstances.
      Thanks for the video and the reply!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Pittaz Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

  • @johndoles3713
    @johndoles3713 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a full-time mechanic since 1978 I remember all this crap

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sounds like you've seen it all! The automotive industry has definitely thrown some challenges our way over the years.
      That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that... That is our mission - bring all memories back to all enthusiasts.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @viperford6840
    @viperford6840 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sad part about the north star is it was a good design with bad parts

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're absolutely right! The Northstar engine had a lot of potential with its innovative design and advanced features like DOHC and aluminum construction. Unfortunately, issues like head gasket failures, oil leaks, and cooling system problems really tarnished its reputation. If Cadillac had used better-quality parts or addressed those flaws earlier, the Northstar could have been remembered as one of the greats. It’s a classic case of a good idea being let down by execution.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @AdelynDodson
      @AdelynDodson 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree that the Northstar had a lot of potential as an innovative design, especially with its advanced tech for the time. Unfortunately, the execution didn’t live up to the engineering vision, with issues like head gasket failures really tarnishing its reputation. It’s a reminder that even the best designs need quality parts and proper execution to succeed!
      it so bad....

    • @KeithGreene-k1v
      @KeithGreene-k1v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It’s frustrating to see such a great design let down by avoidable issues.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@AdelynDodson The Northstar had such promise with its cutting-edge features, but the reliability issues really overshadowed the innovative aspects. The head gasket failures were a huge setback, and it's unfortunate that such a forward-thinking design was plagued by execution problems. It’s a classic example of how great engineering can be undermined by poor durability and quality control.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KeithGreene-k1v Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @iandominics8642
    @iandominics8642 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I really hate the AI narration

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @js17hilton
    @js17hilton 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The sound effects, and music are too loud very distracting.
    Otherwise, good video!

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @Ripsaw17
    @Ripsaw17 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And the Chrysler 2.7 L was a Mitsubishi design that should have told you right there that the engine was garbage

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing your thoughts! The Chrysler 2.7L V6, introduced in the late 1990s, did have its share of issues, but it wasn’t a Mitsubishi design-it was developed in-house by Chrysler. However, it’s fair to say it gained a reputation for poor reliability due to oil sludge problems, which often stemmed from design quirks and maintenance challenges. The small oil passages and high operating temperatures meant even slight neglect could lead to catastrophic failures.
      Interestingly, the engine's design focused on fuel economy and smoothness, but it fell short in durability compared to other engines of the era. Proper maintenance and synthetic oil could improve its longevity, but many owners didn’t know this at the time.
      What are your thoughts on engines with notorious reputations? Share your experiences below! Don’t forget to comment, share this video, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more discussions like this.
      Have a good day, see you next videos.

  • @pl5624
    @pl5624 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The ford cyclone v6 has the 2.7 chrysler issue...internal water pump on fwd vehicles.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes....thank you so much for your information.
      Spend more time with other channel is a good way to explore more American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day, and don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to explore more American Muscle Cars.

    • @account4info
      @account4info 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, it was a poor design, the rwd engines are a lot better

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@account4info Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @OldsVistaCruiser
    @OldsVistaCruiser 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "And Triumph never produced another V8 engine." What about the TR8? The Cadillac V8-6-4 could become very reliable by unhooking one wire that controlled the number of cylinders in operation.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You're right to mention the TR8! Triumph did indeed produce the TR8, which came with the Rover-derived 3.5L V8. It was a solid performer, often referred to as "the English Corvette." As for the Cadillac V8-6-4, you're spot on again. Many owners found that disabling the cylinder deactivation system by unhooking a wire turned the engine into a much more reliable, traditional V8. That simple fix saved a lot of frustration with the complicated tech Cadillac tried to push too soon.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @wallyunitus8071
    @wallyunitus8071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They fixed the head gasket and bolts on the the 4.6 northstars in 05.... they aren't as bad as people say and ive seen some go well over 200k miles on the original engines,they are a bitch to work on tho when they do break down .they made awsome power for such a small displacement

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're right, the 4.6 Northstar did have some improvements by 2005, especially with the head gaskets and head bolts, which were a major issue in earlier models. When they're maintained well, it's true they can last over 200k miles. And for a 4.6-liter V8, the power output was impressive, no doubt about that! But yeah, when something does go wrong, the design makes them notoriously difficult to work on. It’s a love-hate relationship for sure, but you can't deny the Northstar had some real potential.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @starxlr7863
      @starxlr7863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It was actually 2004. Many people do not realize this, but changes were made also because of the available supercharged variant that debuted this same model year. Correct, they are really not bad to work on if you know what you're doing like anything else. One of the first mechanics that I meet years ago that worked on these cars really loved these engines a lot. He stated the cars that had suffered a head gasket issue always stemmed from the cooling system and with the coolant primarily. Having been there and done that, the same holds true to even much older Cadillac's. Proper maintenance goes a long ways.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@starxlr7863
      You're absolutely right! The supercharged variant introduced in 2004 did push some key changes, and it’s often overlooked when talking about that model year. As for the head gasket issues, it's always tied to the cooling system-it’s the Achilles’ heel for many engines, including those older Cadillacs. Like you said, proper maintenance is the key. If you stay on top of things, especially the cooling system, these engines can really go the distance. It's great to hear from experienced mechanics who appreciate these engines and know how to work on them!
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @bobmcbob9603
    @bobmcbob9603 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think that the Chrysler 3.5l and 3.7l engines could have made the list as well

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars

  • @saywhat2014
    @saywhat2014 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Are all these car/motorcycle click bait videos with AI voice overs on you tube coming from the same source ? because they all have major mistakes in the
    same areas. They all have major mistakes in content, all have AI voice overs that cannot pronounce correctly and all seem to have little idea of what they
    are talking about. Also, no Vega ?

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step by Step.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @alvinbanks
    @alvinbanks 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Boy, GM dominated this video on bad engines. I knew Chrysler would be on here with its 2.7 because I had two of them and they were real crap.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're not wrong about GM being heavily featured-it's hard to ignore some of their missteps! And yeah, the Chrysler 2.7L is infamous for sure. Those oil sludge issues were a nightmare for a lot of people. It's always rough when you experience those problems firsthand.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @American-Motors-Corporation
    @American-Motors-Corporation 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The staaaaaaag I got a staaaaaaag!
    Jeremy Clarkson.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @omegasupreme1970
    @omegasupreme1970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    love how most are not only Gms but Caddies to boot.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      It is important information for us to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.

  • @jimzone8153
    @jimzone8153 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What about the notoriously bad Cadillac HT4100?

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ah, the Cadillac HT4100! That engine is definitely one of the more infamous chapters in Cadillac's history. It had great intentions-lightweight, fuel-efficient, and high-tech for its time with aluminum block and cast iron heads. But in practice, it faced serious reliability issues like coolant leaks, head gasket failures, and lackluster power. Many believe Cadillac rushed it to market to meet fuel efficiency demands, and the result hurt their reputation for a while. Still, for better or worse, it was part of Cadillac's shift into more modern, fuel-conscious engineering. Would’ve been great if they had ironed out those early flaws!
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @RCTPatriot75
    @RCTPatriot75 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Didn't the Triumph TR8 have a 3.5 liter V8? Maybe they didn't manufacture that one in house.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, you're correct! The Triumph TR8 did come with a 3.5-liter V8, but it wasn’t a Triumph-built engine. Instead, it used the Rover V8, which was based on the all-aluminum Buick 215 engine that Rover had acquired the rights to in the mid-1960s. While Triumph didn’t manufacture this engine in-house, the decision to use the Rover V8 was a smart move, as it was a reliable and lightweight powerplant that gave the TR8 some solid performance. It’s interesting to think how Triumph’s history might have been different if they had adopted the Rover V8 for the Stag instead of developing their own V8!
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @johnelectric933
    @johnelectric933 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Why can't a human do this work? Good information but the AI pronunciations are flawed in several places. Still good content.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your feedback.
      It is important information for us shortly to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars. Hope to see you next videos.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mosessupposes2571 Thank you for your feedback
      Have a good day.

  • @High-Overlord-Pugula
    @High-Overlord-Pugula หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I had a 98 Buick, that 3800 Series was unkillable

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 3800 Series engine is legendary for its reliability and toughness. Buick's 3800, especially in the Series II version, could withstand high mileage and still run like a champ, thanks to its cast iron block and heads, strong internals, and impressive engineering. It was so durable that GM used it across different models, from Buicks to Pontiacs and even some Oldsmobiles.
      In fact, many enthusiasts still swear by it as one of the best V6 engines ever made. The Series II version was known for hitting 200,000 miles without major issues - quite the feat for any engine!
      Hey, everyone watching, do you have any stories of your own with the 3800 or other tough GM engines? Drop them in the comments! And if you love hearing about engines that just won’t quit, make sure to comment, share, and hit that subscribe button for more on the MUSCLE CAR MASTER CHANNEL....

  • @davidkilts1670
    @davidkilts1670 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Unlike many of this type of video, this video is accurate in my opinion.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information. It is so great...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @georgewilson9121
    @georgewilson9121 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    no vw bettle? those consistatly died at lass than 70k worse than anything listed here

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your comment.
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

  • @radzer0966
    @radzer0966 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And until 2022 they kept doing the same ignorant shit on GM engines cutting off cylinders to “reduce” fuel consumption but it never worked in all the years.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow....That is great information for us and all fans too. We are very happy to know that...
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day. Don't forget to spend more time watching other great videos on our channel and SUB to explore more Muscle Cars

    • @starxlr7863
      @starxlr7863 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Correct, GM still adapted the cylinder deactivation on many Chevrolet/GMC vehicles. This time around would just change back and forth from 8 cylinders to 4 cylinders. In my experience, if the system is working properly, it does work great, however it is a lot less problematic to just run on 8 cylinders constantly. Fuel consumption varies with the driver and driving conditions.

  • @henriyoung3895
    @henriyoung3895 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Mistake.
    Caddy V8,6,4 was bad. But GM sold the design to Alfa Romeo and they fix it quickly. Not DECADES LATER..

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for your information.
      It is important information for us to practice our mission - bring back memories to all fans. Step-by-step
      Let's see our channel is a place to share, comment or show your feelings about American Muscle Cars.
      Have a good day.

  • @OriginalNamething
    @OriginalNamething 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was normal for the stag v8 to be swapped with the "rover v8". Think about how bad an engine needs to be, to be swapped with a rover v8. Which for those who don't know, was the buick 215 aluminum v8. No one likes the 215 buick, it didnt make any power (with exception of the olds starfire turbo), and wasn't very reliable. Somehow in the process of the rights and tooling getting purchased by rover and production moving to the UK, all of a sudden the engine had a good reputation again. I have yet to get a rover v8 owner to acknowledge that their engine is a 215 buick. Kinda funny.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Swapping the Stag's V8 with the Rover V8 highlights just how bad Triumph's original engine was. The Stag V8 suffered from severe overheating, weak timing chains, and poorly designed water pumps, making it notorious for reliability issues. Ironically, the Rover V8, originally the Buick 215, wasn't much loved in the U.S. either-it lacked power and had its own reliability problems. Yet, when Rover bought the design and refined it, the engine gained a reputation for reliability in the UK.
      The Rover V8 swap became popular because, while not a powerhouse, it was more reliable and serviceable than Triumph’s V8. Even with its origins in a mediocre American engine, it was simply a better option for fed-up Stag owners.
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @edwardpate6128
    @edwardpate6128 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Disabling the V8-6-4 took about 5 minutes and involved just pulling a fuse. Otherwise the engine was fine.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You’re absolutely right! Disabling the V8-6-4 system by pulling the fuse was a quick and simple fix, and many owners did just that to avoid the complex cylinder deactivation issues. Once disabled, the engine performed like a standard V8, which was generally reliable. The problem wasn’t the core engine itself but rather the early technology behind the cylinder management, which was ahead of its time and prone to malfunction. It’s a fascinating piece of Cadillac’s engineering history, even if it didn’t quite work out as planned!
      Have a good day.
      Don't forget to like, share or SUB on our channel to enjoy other great Muscle Cars videos.
      Spending more time with other great videos on our channel to explore more about American Muscle Cars.

  • @mistersomaru
    @mistersomaru หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ah, you were talking about the Jag V12, but it sounds like you were referring to the main issues of the 5.3 V12, and not the superior 6.0 HE V12, which has FAR fewer issues... Still a british engine though, but much easier to live with, with better fuel economy, better electronics, and better valve design, and better cooling. Ford probably convinced them to reengineer the thing,. lmao.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're absolutely spot-on about the 6.0 HE V12-it was a significant improvement over the earlier 5.3! Jaguar really stepped up with the 6.0 HE, addressing many of the 5.3's pain points. The High-Efficiency (HE) updates brought better fuel economy through a more advanced combustion chamber design, not to mention an improved cooling system that made it far more reliable. Plus, the 6.0 featured improved valve seat material, reducing wear and helping longevity, along with upgraded fuel injection and ignition systems that added to its dependability.
      Ford’s influence after their acquisition of Jaguar in 1989 did play a part in pushing these changes along, encouraging Jaguar to make it more practical and reliable for everyday use. It’s impressive how they transformed the V12 from an engine that was notorious for its quirks to one that was much easier to live with.
      Everyone, if you’re into details like these and want more in-depth discussions on engines, drop a comment below, let us know your thoughts, and share the video! Don’t forget to hit subscribe and become a part of the Muscle Car Master family-your ultimate destination for muscle car knowledge and memories...Have a good day.

    • @mistersomaru
      @mistersomaru หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@MuscleCarMasters68there WERE some teething issues with the new fuel injection system they used first off though, it was two independant banks, and uh, one would die, and make the car catch fire. They ironed that out though.

    • @MuscleCarMasters68
      @MuscleCarMasters68  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mistersomaru Absolutely, you’re spot on about those early teething issues with fuel injection systems! The two independent banks setup you mentioned had some real challenges in its early days. Engineers wanted to push fuel injection technology forward, but initial designs had kinks to iron out, especially when one bank would fail and cause fuel misfires - a real hazard back then. This led to instances where fuel pooling could cause dangerous backfires or even fires under the hood, as you pointed out.
      Once they refined the system, though, these issues significantly dropped. The later iterations improved reliability and performance, making fuel injection a game-changer for muscle cars’ power and efficiency!
      To everyone watching, what other quirks have you seen in classic muscle car tech? Drop your thoughts in the comments! And don’t forget to like, share, and hit that subscribe button on MUSCLE CAR MASTERS to keep these stories rolling....