Magenta: The colour that doesn't exist - BBC REEL

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
  • When we look at a rainbow, we see a full spectrum of light. Every colour we could imagine. Except one - magenta.
    Where is it? Well, officially magenta doesn't exist. There is no wavelength of light for magenta, meaning the human brain literally makes it up, but how?
    Video by Archie Crofton
    Narrated by Lotte Rice
    Commissioned by Paul Ivan Harris
    - - - - -
    Subscribe to BBC Reel: www.youtube.co...
    More videos: www.bbc.com/reel
    #bbc #bbcreel #bbcnews

ความคิดเห็น • 216

  • @RubyMaster13
    @RubyMaster13 ปีที่แล้ว +67

    BBB: Magenta isn't real
    Me: Magenta is my favorite color

    • @Danzo1212
      @Danzo1212 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      your life isnt real your just dreaming

    • @Blistiana5437
      @Blistiana5437 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sorry to tell you. I like magenta. But it’s actually true😐

    • @Danzo1212
      @Danzo1212 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Blistiana5437 Sorry but your life is not real if you think magenta is a colour mam

    • @Blistiana5437
      @Blistiana5437 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Danzo1212 leave me alone I wasn’t not talking to you

    • @Danzo1212
      @Danzo1212 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Blistiana5437 i never said anything, are you a doomsday prepper type of girl? and why so angry?

  • @stephanelarochelle2484
    @stephanelarochelle2484 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Well, you learn new things every day! I will go to bed more informed tonight than when I got up this morning ...

  • @artistbervucci1716
    @artistbervucci1716 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    Just because magenta is social construct of our minds, does not mean that it doesn't exist. In fact, the whole construct of mind is the very prove of its existence.

    • @fedediblasi
      @fedediblasi ปีที่แล้ว +22

      It's not a 'social' construct, it's a biological construct! So you could say none of the colors are 'real', in the sense that in the reality external to us, they are only lightwaves. Color is how we and other animals detect those lightwaves. Of course, you could say that colors are real, but only as mental entities, never external to our minds.

    • @WafflesHouse8993
      @WafflesHouse8993 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It not "existing" is another way of saying it is not a part of the visible light spectrum. When we "split" light through a prism, you can see this. Or a rainbow.
      It's built of a combination of wavelengths that our brain perceives. Meanwhile, colors like scarlet red or navy blue have a corresponding wavelength.

    • @rizkyadiyanto7922
      @rizkyadiyanto7922 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      colors have feelimg too.

    • @artistbervucci1716
      @artistbervucci1716 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fedediblasi Still a social construct, with biological properties. However, them having names (and quite literally, any word/definition is a social construct), and quite literally (even you admitted) being the construct of our minds - proves that they are just socially constructed.

    • @artistbervucci1716
      @artistbervucci1716 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@WafflesHouse8993 But it still does exist.

  • @JillWhitcomb1966
    @JillWhitcomb1966 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    And yet, one of my favorite colors

  • @OrontesRM
    @OrontesRM หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ...hence the fantastically groovy song 'Magenta Mountain'.

  • @godzillathepro5451
    @godzillathepro5451 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    *Decade is pissed

  • @MagentaDaydreamer360
    @MagentaDaydreamer360 21 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    It does exist, its just difficult for our minds to process and we have limited physical vision. Its like trying to tell society souls don't exists when every single human has one and don't realize it.

  • @yokeenb2737
    @yokeenb2737 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If the color doesn't exist, you can't see it.

  • @foxmyle-a
    @foxmyle-a ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Magnificent! This is the best channel for learning English + I learn something new every day🤩

  • @Lefty7788tinkatolli
    @Lefty7788tinkatolli 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    No colour actually exists.

    • @Decamix300
      @Decamix300 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      The correct thing to say would be of all the colours we perceive, magenta is the only one that does not have a corresponding wavelength and con only be made through a compound.

  • @ElenaKomleva
    @ElenaKomleva ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is silly! Pink, beige, brown, black, white and other colours mixed with either white or black also aren't on the rainbow.

    • @fedediblasi
      @fedediblasi ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes, both brown and magenta are not present in the rainbow, but we perceive magenta as an intermediate between red and blue. That's why artists make color wheels, because we do perceive color as a wheel, not as a spectrum. And magenta is one of the 'pure' colors that appear in that wheel, so we treat it at the same level than red, yellow, green, cyan and blue. Brown is just dark orange. All the colors not present in the rainbow are darker or lighter versions of some other 'pure' color, except magenta. Magenta is not light red or dark blue, it is its own thing, that's why it's special.

    • @ElenaKomleva
      @ElenaKomleva ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@fedediblasi Ok! Thanks for the explanation!

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "Silly"? Are you a Physicist or an Optometrist...?

    • @truthseeker7815
      @truthseeker7815 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mosesjoe3763, bro chill

    • @zelowatch30
      @zelowatch30 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@fedediblasimagenta looks pink to me

  • @The-Zer0th-Law
    @The-Zer0th-Law 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    *prints Magenta in magenta on a paper* Checkmate.

  • @actionhero1983
    @actionhero1983 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    1:29 our ancestors DID NOT live in the sea!😂. We did not "evolve" 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      IKR!? LOL!!🤣 Who needs Facts, Research and Logical Methods...🧠🧬🗑 when we can just Dream and Believe in Fantasies like the Medieval People...🧚🦄🌟

  • @JB-sz4wy
    @JB-sz4wy ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Interestingly enough it should have a wavelength. It's a combined one but so too are orange and yellow and they have known wavelengths as they are a mix of red and green though orange has less green. Magenta is red and blue and pink is red with some green and blue. Pink has a portion of the blue of purple replaced with green and will appear longer or brighter than magenta. Also light blue light is white with a bit of red and green taken out giving it more of a whitish wavelength so you can also make longer and warm blues. Same with gray but since it's all three colors somewhat dimmed it will be dimmer than white but a light silver could still be almost as bright yet alone prettier but a dark gray would be very short as it goes nearer black which is nothing or very little reflected. Midnight blue would be a very dim color. Purples and Greys and greens can vary a lot

  • @Manisphesto
    @Manisphesto ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hold on, if magenta doesn't exist, then how come magenta things exist (like roses, pigments, and anything else)?

    • @SubjectSigma18
      @SubjectSigma18 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Because those things reflect purple and red light

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      They're saying that the Magenta Wavelength dosen't exist. but our brains made up that color when the Long/Low🔴Wavelengths and the Short/High🔵Wavelengths mixed...🌈✨️🌠

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go watch There's no purple light video...
      3 Color Light Receptors (Cone Cells):
      - 🔴Long/Low Wavelengths
      - 🟢Med/Mid Wavelengths
      - 🔵Short/High Wavelengths
      = 🌈✨️🌠

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SubjectSigma18
      Go watch "There's no purple light"🟣...
      3 Color Light Receptors (Cone Cells):
      - 🔴Long/Low Wavelengths
      - 🟢Med/Mid Wavelengths
      - 🔵Short/High Wavelengths
      = 🌈✨️🌠

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Watch "There's no purple light"🟣🚫...
      3 Color Light Receptors (Cone Cells):
      - 🔴Long/Low Wavelengths
      - 🟢Med/Mid Wavelengths
      - 🔵Short/High Wavelengths
      = 🌈✨️🌠

  • @negadoge
    @negadoge ปีที่แล้ว +13

    There’s trillions of colors in the invisible spectrum… including magenta. It’s called the ultra-violet spectrum.

    • @lxy1312
      @lxy1312 ปีที่แล้ว

      no

    • @negadoge
      @negadoge ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@lxy1312 yes, ultraviolet radiation is traditionally divided into four regions: near (400-300 nm), middle (300-200 nm), far (200-100 nm), and extreme (below 100 nm)

    • @justdilka
      @justdilka ปีที่แล้ว +11

      ​@@negadogeNo, Magenta doesn't exist as a wavelength in the visible light spectrum, only with the combination of blue and red waves do we see the color; in our brains.
      The "color" of other wave lengths don't apply here because we can't see them. so to say magenta exists in UV rays is irrelevant because we'll never experience them in the first, regardless of it's true or false. The magenta we see is a by product of Human biology and how it takes information based ONLY on the Visible Light Spectrum.

    • @negadoge
      @negadoge ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justdilka wow... you can't read. I said invisible, try again dumbass

    • @FrankHeuvelman
      @FrankHeuvelman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justdilka
      It's just a curve with a tit in the red and a tit in the blue.
      What's so hard to understand about that?
      I mean, I have a hard time converging my beamer because both my glasses and the beamer optics act like a prism that shifts red and blue. Let's do something about that.

  • @miguelgalindo4995
    @miguelgalindo4995 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I thought that the wavelength could be interpreted as a circle not a actual line that’s why it makes a perfect ratio of red and blue

    • @ipeknurelmeric
      @ipeknurelmeric หลายเดือนก่อน

      the spectrum continues beyond blue and red. we just cannot see the ultraviolet and infrared parts

  • @martinmartinmartin2996
    @martinmartinmartin2996 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    magenta : A source that emits or reflects BOTH 700nm red lght and 450 nm blue is perceived by humans as as magenta.
    As far a human eyesight is concerned, some people see IR light which has a greater wave length than Red light... most others can NOT perceive IR light .
    I agree with ArtistBervucci below. How can the word "exist" apply to the reaction of one's sense of sight, or hearing or touch?
    Does human reaction to the color magenta from a rotting, dead body and the red of a beautiful flower DIFFER ?

    • @250ignacio
      @250ignacio 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who can see infrared? I call BS. No one can see infrared or ultraviolet wavelength colors.
      Magenta doesn’t exists because the ir no wavelength to it. Our brain sees red and blue together and interprets magenta. Watch carefully, you didn’t get much out of the video did you?

  • @proximoist
    @proximoist 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    All colors doesn’t exist.

    • @truthseeker7815
      @truthseeker7815 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      But some are even more made up than others

  • @TimpBizkit
    @TimpBizkit 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Technically all colours aren't "real", they are experiences in the brain that Jesus made sentient or conscious. It is that ability to experience things directly that really sets us apart instead of mere machines with sensors in deep dreamless sleep and is proof of God.
    That aside, a lot of colours are composite - made of mixtures of wavelengths. Grey and white for example, but also brown, although you could make it with dim orange light. It's just that because blue and green are right next to each other, and also red and green are fairly near, you can get the colours inbetween stimulating both receptor cells in differing degrees. Red and blue are at opposite ends of the spectrum, and thus there is no magenta halfway between the transition. Probably the closest colour you can make with one wavelength is violet, but it's far more bluey than magenta.

  • @althafkaamil3211
    @althafkaamil3211 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Decade is pissed

  • @VoidHalo
    @VoidHalo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    By this logic none of the colors exist because color is just how the brain percieves electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength between 400nm and 700nm hitting your eye. There is nothing about say, 530nm EM radiation that is inherently green. It''s just how most of us perceive that wavelength. Some of us don't perceive it as green. Others perceive it slightly less "green" than most people. Color blindness comes in many forms. And that's not the only way color vision can be altered. Reality is just a world your brain builds up from all of the stimulus it recieves, like color.
    Technically, we don't even see in 3D. We need a second eye and some trickery to give any sense of 3D to what we see. And that sense is completely false. Our brains just create the illusion of depth so seamlessly that we almost don't even notice when it's gone when we have one eye closed.

  • @MatthewJacinto-zu6yg
    @MatthewJacinto-zu6yg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Then what is the wavelength of purple we can see purple so what is the wavelength of purple we can Also see pink so what is the wavelength of pink to isn't pink just a light shade of red so we can see pink but not magenta🤔🤔🤔

  • @HumbleHuman-k7g
    @HumbleHuman-k7g 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well, I can't understand one thing why would BBC (state owned entity) puts so much money and effort into this media projects when they can't compete with Germany on innovation side? Or did I miss something?

  • @DumbledoreMcCracken
    @DumbledoreMcCracken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cyan and yellow and red and green and blue also don't exist.
    We have invented them in our minds

  • @TheWordBecameFleshJ114
    @TheWordBecameFleshJ114 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice, expect the part with evolution which is pure speculation.

  • @jasonngamare6525
    @jasonngamare6525 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Crap I saw blue an purple 🟣 in my vision than we had solar flares what does this mean?

  • @SolaceEasy
    @SolaceEasy ปีที่แล้ว +42

    Science presentations from BBC Reel contain the lowest level of Science Education.

    • @31stevieP
      @31stevieP ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Why?

    • @jake-rg3fd
      @jake-rg3fd ปีที่แล้ว +16

      This seems pretty good to me; it explains the phenomenon and the background behind it quite well. What more would you want to see?

    • @SolaceEasy
      @SolaceEasy ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@31stevieP IDK

    • @SolaceEasy
      @SolaceEasy ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jake-rg3fd I'm happy your expectations were met. This was an incomplete explanation by an inexperienced presenter not familiar with the topic.

    • @yohanapereira1629
      @yohanapereira1629 ปีที่แล้ว

      I already disliked this video.

  • @Magenta_Studios
    @Magenta_Studios ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How dare you😢

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pluto: SAME... 😢
      Purple in the Visible Spectrum, and Pluto the 9th Planet...
      These are old(probably inaccurate)former informations,
      that can be explained why they are when reseached:
      - Like Magenta, Purple dosen't have its own Wavelength, and is produced by other Wavelengths from the two ends of the Visible Spectrum...
      - Pluto orbits irregularly along with clusters of other Dwarf Planets, that some of them are even larger than Pluto...

  • @voiceofunsanity
    @voiceofunsanity 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Tell it to star burning at its hottest

  • @rotagbhd
    @rotagbhd 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    BBC is about as trustworthy as CNN

  • @Blistiana5437
    @Blistiana5437 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magenta is fake because it’s not in the spectrum
    Me: Pink white and periwinkle aren’t in the spectrum either does that mean their fake too😅😜🤣😅😅😅

    • @justdilka
      @justdilka ปีที่แล้ว

      lolllll ur so quirky hahahah slay queen keep being a menace 💅💅💅

    • @Blistiana5437
      @Blistiana5437 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justdilka how am I causing harm

  • @rara-i4b
    @rara-i4b ปีที่แล้ว

    FBIが騒ぐな 会見してそう~

  • @rara-i4b
    @rara-i4b ปีที่แล้ว

    王族 殺して ムカツクから

  • @cOmManDerxxL
    @cOmManDerxxL ปีที่แล้ว

    HEBL

  • @rara-i4b
    @rara-i4b ปีที่แล้ว

    化け物 出てる事 知ってるでー

  • @Sierra-Whisky
    @Sierra-Whisky 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:10 I also don't see any brown

  • @user-fed-yum
    @user-fed-yum ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Given how much you spent on the graphics, I'm surprised you didn't spend more time on your research. There are other extra spectral colours. The most obvious being purple.

    • @petergivenbless900
      @petergivenbless900 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Magenta is purple, but you are right about spectrally discontinous colours; spectral filters, made from very thin deposits of glass which cancel very narrow bands of the spectrum through destructive interference, is the basis for eye glasses marketed at people with various forms of "colour blindness" (anomalous trichromatism).

    • @yogibarista2818
      @yogibarista2818 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The spectrum ranges R-O-Y-G-B-I-V and anywhere in that continuous range is a corresponding wavelength for a colour we see. But our brain is also able to assemble composite colours, such as Magenta, Brown, White, etc that are not part of the spectrum. So the point is that if composite colours are not part of the light spectrum we evolved with, how and why did we develop the ability to "see" these composite colours and determine what they should look like ?

    • @tlvance3973
      @tlvance3973 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@yogibarista2818 best response I've read this far. Thanks

    • @fedediblasi
      @fedediblasi ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Magenta is the same as purple. But it is special.
      Yes, both brown and magenta are extra spectral colors, but we perceive magenta as an intermediate between red and blue. That's why artists make color wheels, because we do perceive color as a wheel, not as a spectrum. And magenta is one of the 'pure' colors that appear in that wheel, so we treat it at the same level than red, yellow, green, cyan and blue. Brown is just dark orange. All the extra spectral colors are darker of lighter versions of some other 'pure' color, except magenta. Magenta is not light red or dark blue, it is its own thing.

  • @cOmManDerxxL
    @cOmManDerxxL ปีที่แล้ว

    Hydengoj

  • @electriccosmology1269
    @electriccosmology1269 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Prisms only creates a linear spectrum of separated light and if you mixed one end with the other then you get magenta, with the colours of red and blue. The brain doesn’t just make up the colour, nature produces it, like with any other colour and to think it does is just very silly and you shouldn’t teach such things as fact. If you worked in a photography laboratory in the past you would have quickly been sacked, if you believed in such things, as you wouldn't know how to use the kit. In old school photography and photographic printing plus in TV, we used two different triads of the true light spectrum and not one just separated by triangular shaped glass.
    In the old TV sets, we had red, green and blue guns and which when mixed correctly, could make any other colour. With yellow being made from the red and green guns and which was used due to being pure light and so, there was no matter pigment distorting the pure yellow colour and so also proving, there is no such thing as a primary colour.
    In photography we had to use cyan, magenta and yellow and which when mixed correctly could also make any colour.
    This triad was used due to the medium having to use pigments and which distorts the colour and so when mixing red and green, will give you brown and which is nothing more than a dirt yellow. To make red, we use magenta and yellow. To make blue we use magenta and cyan and to make green we use yellow and cyan. With the different two triads when viewed together as a spectrum, giving one of the esoteric meanings of the six-pointed star and its Electromagnetic Spectrum roots.

    • @petergivenbless900
      @petergivenbless900 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As someone with dueteranomalous trichromatism ("red-green colour blindness") I can tell you that the colours you see sometimes differ from the ones I do; this is because all colour perception in humans is a result of how our visual system codifies different wavelengths of light, different animals also see different colours to humans, and not because those wavelengths have any objective colour themselves. In the absence of an observer there is nothing to distinguish one wavelength of electromagnetism from another save the frequency of the wavelength (which extends far beyond what is perceivable by humans).

    • @mikegrand4181
      @mikegrand4181 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@petergivenbless900 Seems to be a twist on the old saying, "If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody there, does it make a sound?" Thanks for your explanation.

  • @FrankHeuvelman
    @FrankHeuvelman ปีที่แล้ว

    Brown is another one.

    • @justdilka
      @justdilka ปีที่แล้ว

      Brown is dark orange, orange is on the rainbow spectrum

    • @FrankHeuvelman
      @FrankHeuvelman ปีที่แล้ว

      @@justdilka
      Can you give me the RGB values?

  • @budgood6033
    @budgood6033 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Wtf is going on in the UK

  • @politeink5342
    @politeink5342 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So the city I’m from doesn’t exist?

  • @vicwait
    @vicwait ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Well I am going to cause a stir. White light does not exist either, it is a combination of Blue, Green and Red light in equal proportions. The same for yellow (red+green, yeah difficult to believe) and cyan (blue+ green easier to imagine). Remember we are dealing here with LIGHT not pigments. Combine bue + green + red paint and you will not get white but rather a dirty brown.

    • @aoeu256
      @aoeu256 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Actually yellow is a light spectrum in between red and green and also what your brain perceives when you mix red and green light. You can actually see "red-green" which is not yellow by burning your eyes by looking at something that is bright and green for a while, it looks like a very bright version of the color of peanut butter.

  • @jadeyjung
    @jadeyjung ปีที่แล้ว

    great viz from great brit!
    expect more like this

  • @PuffOfSmoke
    @PuffOfSmoke ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Magenta makes sense that it's the odd one because it's the gayest color there is.

    • @bloodswan
      @bloodswan ปีที่แล้ว

      Associating a colour with sexuality 😂 are you retarded?

  • @bennylowery9850
    @bennylowery9850 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Nice blend of science and fairy tales.

    • @truthseeker7815
      @truthseeker7815 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Let me guess… evolution?

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are you a Physicist or an Optometrist...?
      Explain how is this "fairy tales"?

    • @bennylowery9850
      @bennylowery9850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mosesjoe3763 , it’s about 90 per cent speculation, at best.

    • @mosesjoe3763
      @mosesjoe3763 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@bennylowery9850
      Oh, were we talking about evolution?
      I thought we were talking about color...
      In that case what's your field of science...? Are you an Archaeologist, Biologist, Geneticists, Geologist? If so explain what is the 90 percent speculation in evolution?

    • @bennylowery9850
      @bennylowery9850 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mosesjoe3763 , only thinking that I am not gullible enough to believe something spouted out as fact that could not possibly be proven one way or the other. I don’t care if it’s “religion “ or “ science “. Should be prefaced with a warning. “ this is not fact. This is just a scenario that may be true or not, but I just made it up.” I appreciate hard science that can be proven. Call it what it is. That’s all I’m saying. You keep saying are you…. . I’m a thinking human who has lived a lot of years. One thing I’ve learned. It’s not true just because somebody says it .

  • @metricstormtrooper
    @metricstormtrooper ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Now explain why orange doesn't exist.

    • @fedediblasi
      @fedediblasi ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You could say none of the colors 'exist', in the sense that in the reality external to us, they are only lightwaves. Color is how we and other animals detect those lightwaves. Of course, you could say that colors are real, but only as mental entities, never external to our minds.
      Orange is in the light spectrum, but magenta isn't. But what about brown for example? Both brown and magenta are extra spectral colors, but we perceive magenta as an intermediate between red and blue. That's why artists make color wheels, because we do perceive color as a wheel, not as a spectrum. And magenta is one of the 'pure' colors that appear in that wheel, so we treat it at the same level than red, orange, yellow, lime, green, etc. Brown is just dark orange, and beige is just light yellow. All the extra spectral colors are darker or lighter versions of some other 'pure' color, except magenta. Magenta is not light red or dark blue, it is its own thing, and that's why it's special and different from brown or orange.

  • @GIF_CANCEL
    @GIF_CANCEL ปีที่แล้ว

    This is all rubbish

  • @rara-i4b
    @rara-i4b ปีที่แล้ว

    「二十歳過ぎに20過ぎたらあの子死ぬ 言うてるけど なんで?」
    日本人がごっつい「なんで?理由は?」「向こうに親(過去形)居る言うたらあかんの?」
    犯人 ショーペン HARRY WINSTONの娘 が犯人

  • @rara-i4b
    @rara-i4b ปีที่แล้ว

    AV男優のイメージで 今までそれで金にしてた元々軍人の王族
    これからも 合衆国 アメリカ大陸 Srマチアス AV男優のイメージ
    ヨーロッパでも流行らせてもいいわ いっぱい あるから

  • @judil3294
    @judil3294 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you really examined the complexity of the eye you would realize it's no 'accident' of evolution.

  • @capjus
    @capjus ปีที่แล้ว

    What a bs in the way of explanation and nothing new

  • @vspatmx7458
    @vspatmx7458 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bbc is notoriously politically notorious.
    Whixh means..
    BBC as we know it, will cease to exist

  • @davidclark1182
    @davidclark1182 ปีที่แล้ว

    Magenta doesn’t exist? Ridiculous. It’s purple with less than 100% saturation. Who comes up with these ridiculous ideas?

    • @bloodswan
      @bloodswan ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Did you watch the actual video?

    • @justdilka
      @justdilka ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@bloodswanI don't think this guy knows how colors mix, so yes, he probably didn't watch the video