Mathematical formalism in quantum mechanics

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 36

  • @albertliu2599
    @albertliu2599 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It is now 2024... I already forgot how much difference you can feel between 480p and 720p. This video is much sharper than the previous one.

  • @user-rg1nt9lf4s
    @user-rg1nt9lf4s 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    very good content sir. thank you .. sir kindly make a video on Bound
    States for Potential Wells with no rigid walls.(wkb approximation )

  • @sophiac.700
    @sophiac.700 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    on the second page, there is a small typo. you said sqrt{n} but wrote down sqrt{2} on the denominator

  • @janasandmeyer3406
    @janasandmeyer3406 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A hilbert space can be finite dimensional

  • @biotech1468
    @biotech1468 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Informative and enlightening

  • @Mr35diamonds
    @Mr35diamonds 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    You read my mind regarding uncertainty principle......

  • @hrkalita159
    @hrkalita159 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for these videos
    Really helped a lot

  • @mathfreak2521
    @mathfreak2521 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Isn't it the coolest thing ever 🤗 ??( Me pretending i understand something in this LABYRINTH )

  • @bhsieh3537
    @bhsieh3537 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 17:40 integration by parts is uv-integral(v*du). Why would you put du*v?

  • @erbazkhan266
    @erbazkhan266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can anybody explain check your understanding problem?

    • @turboleggy
      @turboleggy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      First one I think just means the expected value of x. Since the integral would be psi star * x * psi over the domain and that is what means. (I'm not sure exactly what he is looking for here)
      Second one would be zero. This is because states of the QHO are a orthogonal basis.
      X hat is hermitian because xhat = x and it is a real number and therefore it is commutative so =int( psi star * x * psi ) = int(x *psi star * psi) =
      * means multiplication not star

  • @abbashusain6053
    @abbashusain6053 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    really helpful, thanks

  • @zairaner1489
    @zairaner1489 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    But wouldn't the (impulse) operator still be hermitian without the minus? You wouldn't have a minus at the end, but you would also not need one? Or more general, I would say that for a hermitian operator A -A is also hermitian (because =-=-=)

  • @carlosmmartinez1408
    @carlosmmartinez1408 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    thaks this is helpful. I love you

  • @synchronicitystudios8217
    @synchronicitystudios8217 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @إحساسفيزيائية
    @إحساسفيزيائية 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks 💜💜

  • @ankitmishra2723
    @ankitmishra2723 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks sir

  • @Maxwell_Integral
    @Maxwell_Integral ปีที่แล้ว

    Because i have an IQ of 23, does this video include determinate states?
    EDIT: I'm sorry I am so dumb I just found It

  • @andrevlok9932
    @andrevlok9932 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    But can it run X

  • @user-vh4jn4vv8e
    @user-vh4jn4vv8e 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @mlungost
    @mlungost 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The way you did the momentum operator example is not great for those us attempting to follow what you did., please consult the Griffiths book

  • @backupemail6831
    @backupemail6831 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wat

  • @santino4203
    @santino4203 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who would dislike wth?

  • @externitiy3692
    @externitiy3692 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wtf im just 8th grade and i just understand a bit of this.

    • @milk9613
      @milk9613 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SunDarating am just 2 grade

    • @Oliver-xt5wu
      @Oliver-xt5wu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm first grade and I'm already at Phd level

    • @milk9613
      @milk9613 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      O. G Austin Am owen a lott of besnisis. Am new stev job.

    • @allanhuang3361
      @allanhuang3361 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@milk9613 I am become death, the destroyer of worlds

  • @jagergaming2281
    @jagergaming2281 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ummmmmmmmmm... im trying to find out wtf this guy is talking about, I can do things like calculus, but this, this just gets complicated, and I wanna know how to actually use this, and calculate something out of it, and properly use this.

    • @osamaishtiak6135
      @osamaishtiak6135 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Well then you'll need to do atleast a bachelor's in physics. For quantum mechanics first learn linear algebra, fourier transforms and special functions (Mary Boas' book is great for this)[you should also learn how to solve differential equations; partial differential equations are a bonus] . Then start with Quantum Mechanics by David Griffiths which is what this guy is following. Also the math used here is not complicated, if you are comfortable with calculus upto calculus 3 and linear algebra then this math is trivial.

    • @Salmanul_
      @Salmanul_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can watch his earlier videos and also read the book "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by David Griffiths which he is following

  • @gamerdude19183
    @gamerdude19183 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    brain hurtie

  • @darkzombie524
    @darkzombie524 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just copy pasted griifiths, you totally made a mess of the standard deviation formula.
    Came here to understand it. YOU FAILED SUCCESSFULLY.

    • @SumitYadav-mx8bp
      @SumitYadav-mx8bp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Completely agree with you !
      he pretends to explain everything but he's actually failing
      To explain anything in a coherent manner

    • @stefanrolfs419
      @stefanrolfs419 ปีที่แล้ว

      The definition of variance in statistics is (X−⟨X⟩)^2 which can be written as ⟨X^2⟩−⟨X⟩^2. This relates to QM with (Q−⟨Q⟩)^2 and in its expanded form is (Q−⟨Q⟩)(Q−⟨Q⟩) = Q^2−2⟨Q⟩Q+⟨Q⟩^2 . Meaning ⟨ψ|Q^2|ψ⟩^2 − 2⟨Q⟩⟨ψ|Q|ψ⟩ + ⟨Q⟩^2. This simplifies to ⟨Q^2⟩ - ⟨Q⟩^2 as -2⟨Q⟩⟨ψ|Q|ψ⟩ = -2⟨Q⟩^2.

  • @mkminerals12343
    @mkminerals12343 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    an inappropriate way of teaching some concepts