Phil Robertson talks free speech, religion and STDs at CPAC

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.พ. 2015
  • 'Duck Dynasty' star addresses addresses the 2015 Conservative Political Action Conference
    Watch video covering topics about Tv.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 72

  • @grabir01
    @grabir01 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Phil is telling like it is.. Phil is right..

    • @wesleymoore9781
      @wesleymoore9781 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +grabir01 no he isn't

    • @te2952
      @te2952 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @wesley moore Yes he is!

  • @grabir01
    @grabir01 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    In case anyone is not getting it. Phil is referring to Obama at the prayer meeting..

  • @aliksteel
    @aliksteel 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Phil is the man

    • @PapaWooody
      @PapaWooody 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Phil is an atheist homosexual.

  • @kebbygames9052
    @kebbygames9052 9 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I just wish we had a "Phil" in charge of this country again!

    • @PapaWooody
      @PapaWooody 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      You mean Phil Donahue?

  • @briantimmins3369
    @briantimmins3369 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    A very intelligent person who clearly sees what has happened to our country.
    Too bad their are so many atheists and morons who will see what happens in
    the future here! He is right with everything he is saying.... wish he would be in Congress.

    • @ollaitsrealgood
      @ollaitsrealgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you're going to insinuate that anyone besides yourself is a moron, you might want to learn how to properly conjugate the word "their/there/they're" before doing so. :P

  • @nomiclas
    @nomiclas 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Somebody give this guy a church!

  • @orlanduce
    @orlanduce 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    he must be the 'comedy relief' of the conference

    • @bdmass
      @bdmass 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Troll!

    • @briantimmins3369
      @briantimmins3369 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And, you must be the idiot or AKA a box of rocks!

    • @deborah5212
      @deborah5212 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Idiot !!!

    • @gabeprice3333
      @gabeprice3333 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yea, he's too much sometimes. The smooth tone then shouting suddenly etc.

  • @berniefritz5600
    @berniefritz5600 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought it was supposed to be separation of church and state. Why is he preaching religion in politics. Hmmm.

    • @aydenhall4126
      @aydenhall4126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bernie Fritz the only place that comes into play is in a school.

    • @aydenhall4126
      @aydenhall4126 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Bernie Fritz this country is founded on our belief of the creator.

    • @aydenhall4126
      @aydenhall4126 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Separation of church and state does not have itself in the constitution

    • @tommywright7196
      @tommywright7196 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Separation of church and state means the state has no control over the church

    • @ollaitsrealgood
      @ollaitsrealgood 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tommywright7196 And also that the church has no control over the state. :)

  • @magister343
    @magister343 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The motto of Nazi Germany was "Gott Mitt Uns," which means "God With Us." Nazis were very big on portraying an image of being strongly Christian, on using Civil Religion to attract voters and to bolster the power of the State. Their strand of "Positive Christianity" was of course completely divorced from the actual teachings of Jesus, but I don't see many on the Religious Right in America today emphasizing commandments like "Love your enemies" either.

    • @mas3dog
      @mas3dog 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      And Chris Kyle thought that too, doesn't mean he's a bad person , sure he's done mistakes , and he knew it , he's way more American then you'll ever be

    • @jimmybower4840
      @jimmybower4840 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude do you have any idea how many Christians were executed under the Nazi regime? during their dozen year rein? 2 million German Christians! were executed under the rein of Adolf Hitler alone, the number of French Christians that were killed was 1 million, Eastern Europeans who were christian was about 5 million. And the Balkan Christians that were killed was 3 million. And the Italian Christians who were killed was anywhere from half of a million to 1 million. So in the end it was between 11,500,000 to 12,000,000 people who were christian that were executed. This does not include the combatants, or the people in the camps but was rather just average civilians.
      " If there is any God, there is only one then. I have no doubt in my mind that he smiles on me down from Valhalla with rejoice. For the one true God that is with us, is the spirit of Germany itself. " - Adolf Hitler
      The nazis hated Christianity with a passion, almost as much as they hated Jews. And from this quote it is true that Hitler was an atheist. The nazis wanted a new religion for crying out loud, with Darwinism, paganistic rituals, surrounded around the belief in a one German God.
      th-cam.com/video/FAo1tdUn73U/w-d-xo.html
      follow the link and watch if you dont believe me. For the lord's sake get off of political correctness! people!

  • @chosenonebygod
    @chosenonebygod 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 15 mins in, he says that it's religion, that should guide our path, but religion was not created by Yahweh; it was created by man~! Yahweh is the only one who should guide our path~! I'm of GOD; not of a religion~!!!!!!!

  • @Americanm100
    @Americanm100 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    He's an American Ayatollah! Thank God for the constitution!

  • @magister343
    @magister343 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    The US Constitution was a Federal power grab, intended to expand the central government's ability to serve the interests of the elites as much as politically feasible at the time. The limits it contained were mostly meant to appease the masses just enough to prevent them from blocking the new constitution's ratification. By and large, the current constitution is an inferior document to the Articles of Confederation which came before it. The Bill of Rights is the best part of it, and it was forced through by the faction who really did not want the new constitution in the first place. The Federalists were never friends of liberty. Neither were half of the Anti-Federalists.

  • @DakotaBeerDrinker74
    @DakotaBeerDrinker74 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Holy Rolling Blowhard!!!

  • @unicornofjustice
    @unicornofjustice 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can we just keep religion out of politics? It would be cool if we could work on issues on hand and not if the other dude reads from the same book as you.

    • @GhostHawk1776
      @GhostHawk1776 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nope! Freedom of religion. Read the Constitution! Love God!

    • @unicornofjustice
      @unicornofjustice 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      wrongggggg theres a reason they didn't want to combine them. When your faith becomes the minority you wont have the same outlook. Think about it. Plus governance should be equal and not tainted by such things.

    • @bigfootnmore6619
      @bigfootnmore6619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If people were to love God and love their neighbors like the bible says to do would our country be better or worse?

  • @orlanduce
    @orlanduce 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LET PEOPLE WHO 'SHOULDN'T GIVE A SPEECH' GIVE A SPEECH.

    • @bdmass
      @bdmass 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Troll!

    • @TraderRoss
      @TraderRoss 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      At least he can talk for 30 min without a teleprompter.

    • @georgejungl2381
      @georgejungl2381 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      TITAN-UP Productions, LLC he tells the truth, media can't shut him up and the word of God was released....

    • @georgejungl2381
      @georgejungl2381 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      can't argue with nothing he said

  • @magister343
    @magister343 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    George Washington was a huge hypocrite. He is not someone we ought to admire.
    He may have banned cursing, but is known to have had a horrible temper and cursed frequently himself.
    He claimed to fight for freedom, but did not free his own slaves.
    Washington tried to get a commission as an officer in the British army, and only chose to join the fight for independence after he was rejected.
    After fighting a war supposedly about taxation without representation, he fought another war to crush the Whiskey Rebellion. The Federal tax on distilled spirits (which was the only thing which the more remote farmers could transport cheaply enough to sell at a profit, in order to afford their rent or taxes) was far higher than any of the British taxes ever were, and the frontiersmen had no more real representation in passing them than the colonists had virtual representation in Congress.
    One of the most important real reasons for the American Revolution was that the British had banned the colonists from settling out passed the Appalachian mountains, in order to prevent another Indian War. American colonists wanted that land, and they would rather kill its native inhabitants than immigrate on their terms. George Washington had a lot to gain from independence, as he has surveyed the whole Ohio River Valley in his youth. Despite never actually improving the land, most of the states considered his maps to be evidence enough that he had homesteaded it all and was its rightful owner. That was more land than owned by any European Monarch. It was not of much value while the Indians controlled it. He wanted colonists to move out west, improve it, and pay him rent. He really did no like it when after the war poor people went out and became squatters on his land, working to establish homesteads without making him rich. Those were the sort of people he rode out in force to crush.
    The reason he did not run for a 3rd term was that he was not particularly competent, and was afraid it would start to show. It was extremely painful for him to stand up straight to give speeches, due to injuring his back when he literally fell off his high horse while riding out to crush the Whiskey Rebellion. He was getting a bit senile in his old age and forgetting things. Investigations into the corruption of Alexander Hamilton uncovered facts which pointed as Washington either being complicit in corruption or else negligent to prevent it.
    I don't know that I'd consider Hamilton a credible source, but some of his writings do imply that Washington made repeated homosexual advanced towards him.