ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ค. 2024
- Eric Schmidt joined Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang in a fireside chat (scl.ai/3Dev1a7) to discuss the intersection of AI with a wide range of topics including healthcare, national defense, and how we can be better prepared to respond to the challenges of the future.
Executive Summary: Geopolitics of AI - scl.ai/3EfQPDD
Full discussion transcript - scl.ai/3Dev1a7
Bio: Eric Schmidt, Co-Founder of Schmidt Futures and Former CEO of Google, is an accomplished technologist, entrepreneur, and philanthropist. He joined Google in 2001 and helped grow the company from a Silicon Valley startup to a global leader in technology alongside founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page.
Join the leading AI community full of leaders, visionaries, practitioners, and researchers. Get full access to more discussions like this: exchange.scale.com - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
I'm 17 years old and This Interview really Inspire to work In AI and Build AI Startups
I was really captivated while listening to the conversation! It is so obvious that the educational system in the US is in need of a major upgrade.
Damn right, many of us other countries too
The 50 states thing makes things really slow, hope to see more great teamwork going on. Wyoming digital asset bill really made me smile, until I heard Charles say "maybe 12-18months after some changes" we need more cooperation, more than ever. Us vs them mentality is adding complexity by the day.. people are so radicalized and divided on antisocial media it is hard to watch some of the horrible logic. ML assistants can help there, but if people have a big ego (many of us do) then they will just not listen to it ?
Super tricky situation, hope I'm write about AGI being far more complicated than it appears, and it appears too complicated for this decade.
Absolutely. We need a lot of change/reform and we don’t talk about it much at all in the US.
Thank you for fascinating podcasts with Eric Schmidt.
Amazing! Such an open, kind, thought provoking, dynamic discussion covering various dimensions of where we are, what we face, and what kind of scenarios to go forward may make sense - to meet various objectives of the society - human progress. I am almost 75 years old. My main interest to watch this was how ordinary people may have life where they feel empowered (and not left behind) such that they can find the reasons of their existence. So, my orientation/interest may be a bit different but I learned a lot (although with lots of unknowns) about how the industry and government may search ways to make sense of the situation going forward....
just now getting a chance to watch and listen through, very interesting points, have always enjoyed Eric's input and will have to check out his book as well
"...a situation where universities invented mRNA, private sector built the vaccines, and the government guaranteed the market whether it worked or not." This explains a lot.
I am not sure what you are suggesting here, but what I understand is that the government agreed to pay for it (guaranteeing the market), but only deliver to people if it was safe and effective.
This was so interesting! Thank you for uploading these discussions with tech leaders- appreciate it!
i really enjoy watching and learning from you. i will closely watch you moving forward
I do that hand wave at the end too loll
46:49 Critical problem that's in need of a solution
STEM
How does STEM solve the problem of centralized power?
4:55
Nice conversation, very informative but I'm truly perplexed as to why this amount of attention is not given to solving some of our monumental societal problems? As I watch this world evolve I notice that we really don't care about those that are being left behind whether it be the elderly or the poor. Why can't we use ai to eliminate the need for our societies to rely on something as antiquated as money since money only has an perceived value? I know that this is a way out thought, it's just that just seem that we are in some type of superficial simulation.
i think one hard concept to understand is that the way we help those elderly and poor is by advancing the top. im not saying this is fact or that i even support this, because at this point i think it’s gotten out of balance
@@kevando_gg Ahhh, the old trickle-down theory! I prefer to think that if you strengthen the foundation of your society it becomes more stable and conducive to growth. Just think of all the brilliant minds that are being left behind just because of this superficial monetary system. Money is truly the "dead weight" of the world. If there was a way to free ourselves of the slavery of money, this world would possibly solve all of its issues overnight.
Money is not only a perceived value, we got finite resources, and money is just an arbiter.
I admire Eric's personality!
4:05, 7:13
Family✡️🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔪🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔪🔪🔫🔫🔫🔫🔫🔪🔪🔫🔪🔫🔫🔫
I’m glad Eric gave Vannevar Bush a shoutout
The difference is the US keeps talking about spreading its values around the world while the Chinese has no such ambition. They will trade/ cooperate with any government system and respect your values.
Let's forget about the labels for a minute and just look at the historical data between China and the US in how they treat other nations. If you just look at that data would you pick the US over China as a partner?
If the US weren't dominant, then there will be a lot of players who would want to impose themselves in the world we have seen it before 1950s as well as the cold war. Broadly speaking US wanting to spread it's values isn't bad in that it's reducing this tendency, it's when they get mixed with corporate and warmongering interests that it becomes a problem, which I agree happens far too often. Also US doesn't bother if a system is localized enough, for example it doesn't interfere with the Saudi value system which is at the opposite pole of what US is in several ways. Historical data isn't good from a larger perspective. History isn't a test tube. The US has proved that it can change and is constantly looking for change. Do China's authoritarian ideologies have any hope of changing?
@drstalone China adopted capitalism, that's a big change.
That's a change to the economic system, not the political or social one, besides the CCP is muffling Big Tech to that extent that makes it look "communist". The problem is not capitalism or communism though. Either would be okay it it wasn't an authoritarian surveillance state. The discussions we are having here or this video wouldn't exist on Bilibili. Not to mention Bilibili exists only because they can't access TH-cam in China.
@drstalone so you're saying a change in the economic system doesn't affect the social? That's untrue.
@@intothemoat I didn't exactly say that. as that would be technically untrue, but it doesn't matter as the claim is still meaningful in a practical sense with regards to the nature of CCP and whatever its ideologies derive from, the concerns around which I have already raised in the previous comment.
Can he just run for president?