Anglican Unscripted 880 - It's a Mad, Mad, Mad World
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ก.ย. 2024
- Please Donate www.paypal.com...
/ kkallsen
/ geoconger
Kevin's Links:
/ anglicanunscripted
/ anglicanink
/ anglicantv
----------------------------
Anglican Unscripted is the only online video newscast in the Anglican Communion. In each episode, Kevin Kallsen and Canon George Conger and occasional guests bring you their unique prospective on news around the globe.
---------
Podcast Apps should all find the Podcast by searching for AnglicanTV
Useful links for you: -
Podcast Site - anglicantv.sim...
Podcast Feed - rss.simplecast...
Google Play Music - play.google.co...
Spotify - open.spotify.c...
TuneIn - tun.in/pi6m5
Itunes - itunes.apple.c....
![วันเกิดเธอ (TO YOU) - PHUWIN [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_ROx1Bj3T0Y/mqdefault.jpg)
We discovered Anglican Unscripted during covid.
It has been a revelation and an encouragement every month!!
So grateful to God for your faithful ministry - sharing The Truth with undaunted confidence in Him to continue building His church despite the circumstances that assail it....the gates of hell will not prevail against her-United'as-one'in-Christ our Lord - praise His Name and God bless you guys x
How very kind of you. Thank you
REC and GAFCON need to step up and make a statement. "The only thing needed for evil to succeed is for good men to remain silent."
Regarding the older men in your parish, someone once said this and I’ve always remembered it. “There are some truths so profound that we must hear them over and over again until we hear them for the first time“. The Gospel is worth sharing over and over again
Canada is a perfect example that once Faith is abandoned, Reason disappears. Where God is despised, human life is hated. Atheist materialism is sustainable through mass drug abuse.
Love Canada
Canada went over to the dark side during COVID. They arrested people who were not breaking ANY law.
Trump got jumped by the ABC moderator for saying babies are born live.
Keep being courageous, my brothers in Christ.
Thank you for another entertaining show guys. I always try to watch every episode from start to finish. God Bless you from Poland!
Thank you for staying true to preaching the Gospel. I would argue that no one who is indwelt by God's Holy Spirit can be a universalist. Jesus is exclusive--THE way, THE truth, and THE life.
Are you alluding that Pope Francis is an "universalist"? I understand how you might arrive at the conclusion from what others are saying about him. There is a small bitter group, Traditional Latin Mass people, reactionaries, in the Roman Catholic Church who do not like post-Vatican II changes, and who are playing up anything that they can find against the pope to discredit him. In regard to Jesus' being the way, the truth, and the life, consider that people need to learn what Jesus taught and did before accepting or rejecting him. Now, yes, in my opinion, Pope Francis has been justly criticized for ambivalence on morals. In regard to TLM people, it would seem Anglicans would be wary of them, considering Article XXIV of the Articles of Religion, on the importance of the liturgy being in the language of the people.
Thank you ❤
As a practicing Catholic I can say that Pope Francis has no moral or political authority as well. Jesus is the Way! Deus Dominus-Jesus
lol sound a bit like a Protestant to me 😉 ( I am just teasing you)
God bless you, thank you
I like your biasses - probably because I share most of them. I appreciate how you apply these to Church and secular news. I'll keep watching and listening to your analysis and comment. Thank you from England and keep up the good work. Please keep praying for us under the regime of Communist two tier Kier.
Thank you
Canon George you are a generous and spirit filled man,I'm going to your Jail,bells n smells plus your sermon( that's not jail)😅
Kevin you're great too😊
Bless you both,its always insightful and fun.
My Cavaliers, Cora and Oliver, are snoring as I watch.
Sounds good
Immigration of skilled labor also reduced the quality of the countries they are migrating from. while also driving down wages for skilled laborers here. Nah, just pause immigration for a decade till we get it sorted out.
D.E.I. is one of our greatest idols today. I hear whispers now referring to the acronym as 'Didn't Earn It.'
Dei is also “god” in Latin. Interesting.
I get what you are saying but how much more diversity can we stand ? Love you guys
At General Convention in the early 2000s, the late Bp. Herzog pointed out the large contingent of Chinese operating in the Sudan .
Just to point out to the two of you that last week you were crowing about Francis being Anglican. This week he's too much for you. 😂
I am a Catholic and I, too, am concerned about the reckless statements of Pope Francis.
Why be a missionary or even a Catholic if it is only one of many ways to salvation. Jesus Our Lord is the only way to the Father. He, alone, is the world's only Saviour. We need Popes and bishops who are true Apostles like Peter who said, "There is only one Name under heaven by which we can be saved.... Jesus Christ!"
Did the Pope say there are "many ways to salvation"? What do you think he meant when remarked. "God is God for all"? He was talking to young people on how to open dialogue. After opening dialogue, one can get into the meat and potatoes.
The why comes from the who: this pope is a potato, I'm a profigal son, i don't particularly like him yet, when I go to Adoration, i get outta there w joy and enough power to basically pray over ppl and their souls get sanctified or even saved. M+
@@royquick-s5n Jorge's words inevitably lead to the conclusion that salvation is optional - this is the only conclusion if religions are just languages that all lead to god. No need for Jesus or Christianity or salvation if any other religion will get you to god.
@@russ254 Disagree. In my opinion, you are reading into what Pope Francis said something he did not say. I challenge you to find specifically, word for word, Pope Francis' saying that salvation is optional. Please consider that he was addressing an interreligious group at a Catholic Junior College about entering, opening, dialogue about religion. I have stated in these blogs that Pope Francis' words seem to be in align with Vatican II Nostra Aetate.🤔
Why not like the movie- A mad, mad, mad, mad world. Quadruple mad.
A good point David.
Great episode! I love hearing your views on the Catholic news. Lots of us Catholics are unhappy with Francis. He's been at this for years. Sadly, many Catholics don't take an interest in 'high level' stuff, and remain blissfully ignorant of what is going on at the Vatican. But as you point out, the traditional voices are ever louder, thank goodness.
Brett Murphy - hmmm! While I support him in his ongoing issues with the FCE, he doesn’t do himself any favours, does he? Free speech is a wonderful thing, but when you have two children and a pregnant wife, I would dare to suggest that a bit of wisdom is in order. I flatly don't believe that God has told him to say all this stuff - but he seems almost to be enjoying being some sort of martyr. This ain't right when your choices result in your wife and kids becoming homeless! I speak from painful experience, having grown up with parents who claimed that God was telling them to go somewhere new every 2-3 years, regardless of the wreckage caused in their children's lives. Frankly, while it looks as if there has been a failure of process in his sacking, he could really do with showing a bit more maturity in his choices. I'll get off my soapbox now 🙄.
You seem to be justifying Brett Murphy's keeping his mouth shut because his family may be used as a tool to do it. I suppose Fenwick and people who dislike his blogs have been counting on it. "Traditional voices"? You would not by coincidence be TLM?
@@royquick-s5n What??? I'm saying that it is possible to get a traditional perspective across on social media without crossing the line into areas that are likely to threaten your home. That's my point.
Plus...Francis clearly quoted on the Vatican website as saying 'All religions lead to God'. So I'm not sure what TLM has to do with my earlier comment.
@@UKjudithfs Disagree. You implied that Father Murphy ought to be more considerate of his family. That suggestion alone seems "crossing the line." Secondly the quotation you give is not an accurate quote from the Vatican News site. I have provided it in the blogs. It seems trying to sidestep the immediate translation by the cardinal at the time that it was made. The cardinal's translation is in accord with the quote reported in Vatican News. In regard to "what TLM has to do with it," just peruse the video commentaries in TH-cam on Pope Francis' address to the interreligious group in Singapore on September 13th. You will see how defenders of TLM misquote and hype the pope's address, e.g. Gavin Ashenden and Mark Lambert on Catholic Unscripted and Taylor Marshall. Gavin and Mark treat TLM favorably, and Taylor is gung ho TLM. Both Gavin and Taylor were formerly Anglican clergy, strange, in consideration of Article XXIV in the Articles of Religion.
@@royquick-s5n stop with this weird fixation on the Latin mass - it's not supposed to be an insult that you can lob at people.
@@russ254 First, in my opinion, it is not a weird fixation. The advocates of it are certainly making an issue online. It encompasses more than the preference for the older Mass in Latin. The advocates for it look back to Vatican I, are highly critical of Vatican II, and seem to be trying to find fault with Pope Francis for every little thing that they can find. Doubt it? Check for example Taylor Marshall and Catholic Unscripted. I suppose they are bitter because of the curtailment of the older Mass in Latin. I understand that they constitute a very small minority in the Roman Catholic Church. They should be no friends of Anglicans just in consideration of Article XXIV of the 39 Articles of Religion alone.🙂
I love you two wise old heads and this little show. Thanks for your commitment to it, us and The Lord, I appreciate your devotion to the truth and I must say that of all the foreigners I have ever encountered, George is the only one with such a great grasp of the British political system and how it works. If you ever Come to the UK George I'd love to buy you a pint!
I really didn't know that the fighting in Sudan is about oil, or that China and Russia are funding the opposing sides. Thank you, I try to pay attention to these things, but I was ignorant on that
We may learn from George more than we might learn from ABC, CBS, and NBC newscasts.
I’m not sure I understand why it is we’re talking about churches in Sudan closed down and not talking about churches in Rwanda being closed down?
Thanks for the show - I agree with just about every word of it, but I wonder if you agree with me here? When explaining that church leadership is male, St Paul focused on God’s created order - ‘Adam was formed first, then Eve’ - indicating that male headship should be for all places and all times. He affirmed male headship in stating that ‘the man is head of the woman, even as Christ is head of the church’ - then going on to say that ‘wives should submit… to their husbands’. Men should not then submit to someone else’s wife who becomes a ‘bishop’.
In approaching Eve, the serpent intentionally set about subverting the God-given order before going on to question the word of God, contradict the word of God, and suggest to the woman that she could be like God. She took the lead and Adam, the man, followed in an act of sinful rebellion. And that’s the issue here from start to finish - rebellion. It’s as the sin of something or other.
David, Paul was obviously in the Epistles concerned about keeping order, keeping order in the cultural norm of the day, including Jewish tradition. Women were not professionals as they are professionals today, having shown that they can do the job. Are we to go backward, to the way it was? Paul also said women should keep their heads covered in worship. How many women do you think would agree to do that today? Some make Paul out to be the Taliban. Jesus, the Son of God, said we should treat others as we want them to treat us. Jesus' words outrank anything Paul may have said by far. Jesus' words may be applied to abolition of slavery and to woman suffrage. They may be applied to occupation as well.
That’s sort of what I copied from another persons years ago, here it is
“The most important book in the OT is Genesis, in it we discover what God is like, how he created the world, how he relates to humanity, and what happened at the beginning. Genesis is the foundation on which Christian doctrine is built. This is certainly true when we come to 1 Timothy 2:11-15. Here we find Paul explaining his commands concerning a women's activity in the Christian gathering. His reason for not permitting women to teach or exercise authority over a man arises out of the account of creation and the fall. So before piecing together Paul's argument, one must look at the Genesis account.
1. In Genesis 1:28:28 "man" is made to rule the earth and all the creatures in it. Explain whether this refers to the male alone, or the male and the female ? Clearly v 26 refers to male n female.
2. So why was women created ? Gen 2:15-25. To compliment her man, neither stronger or weaker, a unity becoming one flesh.
3. So describe the authority relationship between God, Adam, the woman, and the rest of creation ?
God created Adam then eve as Adams helper and both to rule over creation.
4. There are 3 cases of authority being overthrown in the passage Gen 3:1-19
And 3 sets of consequences, what are they ?
A. Serpent is out of order and deceitful, consequences are enmity between satan n God, so therefore God will provide a head crusher.
B) eve convinces Adam to eat the apple, consequence is childbearing pains, sorrow and husband will rule over you.
C) Adam should have submitted to Gods Authority, consequences- he has to work hard to provide, hence much joy is removed.
5. So then read 1 Tim 2:11-15.
Clearly man and women are EQUAL though have DIFFERENT qualities, but both are saved in the same way as they persevere in their faith to carry out the Lords calling in their life, one example being the unique of women in childbearing.
6. so what is the basis for Paul's command ? Creation ordinance >eternal principles>headship>submission within a church.
Clearly the argument in 1 Timothy has 3 threads that have been picked up by Paul from Genesis: firstness, deception and the difficulties of childbirth.”
@@robmarshall956 The Old Testament is a record of the preparation for the New Testament, which contains an account of the life of Jesus and a commentary on it. As Bishop Frank E. Wilson stated, "The Bible is important because of Christ--not the other way around." For the Christian, it would seem, the Old Testament should be read in the light of the New Testament, especially Jesus' teachings and example, e.g. Jesus' saying, "And as you wish that men do to you, do so to them." Lk 6.31-32.
@@royquick-s5nwait up Roy I haven’t put the comment up it keeps disappearing)
1. Firstness v13
Paul says women have the position they do because Adam was formed first. "Firstness often carries connotations of authority in scripture, as it does in our own use of language eg prime minister simply means the "first minister".
So what can be said is there is an order to creation, God could have created Adam simultaneously, but he didn't. He created Eve for Adam. She was created to be mans "helper" and was made perfectly suitable for the task. This is absolutely key to understanding her relationship to Adam.
2. Deception v 14
Gen 3:13 records the woman confessing "the serpent deceived me, and I ate" Adam is clearly not described as being deceived: RATHER, his sin is that he "listened to the voice of his wife and ate of the tree" 3:17.
So why is eves deception significant? Well Eve was deceived by one of the animals that God had made, OVER whom she was meant to be in dominion, refer to Gen 1:26:28.
This was why she "became a sinner"-not because she was silly or gullible enough to be fooled, but Because SHE WAS DECEIVED into overturning the good order that God had created. Instead of ruling the snake under God, she listened to and Obeyed the snake, attempted to become like God and then lead her husband to do the same.
Sooo as God pronounces judgment in Gen 3, the overturned order is emphasised in the way he deals first with the serpent, then with the woman and then with man. In the cursed and FALLEN world, the good order of chapter 2 becomes distorted and bitter- the serpent will attack the woman's offspring and be crushed under his heel; the woman will attempt to master the man, but he will be dominated by him instead; and the man, rather than ruling and tending a bountiful garden, will gain his food by sweat from a hostile earth.
There is an order to Gods creation; there is a structure to the relationships between men and women that is built into the very fabric of things. God made Adam first and Eve to be his helper, and both to rule over the rest of the creation. The very essence of Adam and Eves sin was their overturning of this order yet here many are trying to do just that again ?????
So before looking at the 3rd theme in Genesis (childbirth) review the first 2. Obviously when one compares Gen 2-3 with 1 Timothy 2, the relationship between the two passages is not difficult to see. Women are being warned NOT to upset the order of creation by usurping authority in the manner that Eve did. What we find more difficult to understand is why this should be expressed through teaching in the church, and what it is about teaching that makes Paul single it out as the authority issue, so do women have to be utterly silent and not say a word in Christian gatherings ??
The answer to that rests in our understanding of what "teaching" is. People tend to think of teaching as merely an intellectual activity- imparting knowledge or giving instruction to someone. However, in the Bible and indeed in other fields as well, teaching involves a special type of relationship between the teacher and the student.
Christian teaching involves authority. The teacher moulds the life of the taught: the teacher is given the privilege and responsibility of guiding, informing, persuading, changing and leading. This is why teaching and authority are so closely tied together in 1 Tim 2:12. To be in a teaching relationship with someone is to be exercising some sort of Authority over him or her.
Under Christ's authority, and through his word to us in 1 Tim 2:11-12, we are told that woman ought not to teach or have this authority over men. Teaching a man is wrong because by teaching him, the woman enters into a relationship of authority over him. By teaching the man, the woman is falling into Eve's error- turning the order of creation upside down. Teaching is the flip side of learning "quietly with all submissiveness" v11. Eve's sin involved overturning the order of creation and teaching her husband !!. Similarly, Adams sin came from listening to his wife in the sense of heeding and following her instructions. He allowed himself to be taught by her, thereby putting himself under her authority and reversing Gods good ordering of creation.
This biblical teaching may seem hard, especially in a society where women aim for, and often achieve, authority over men. But this isn't talking about a position as CEO of a company or a womens capacity in that regard, it's about how the church is to be run. We have to trust that any unhappiness with this instruction springs from our mistrust in the Goodness of Gods word. The word seems far less terrible if
1. We believe in Gods goodness and that he wants the best for us.
2. We don't see quietness and full submission as weakness, but as meekness- not as a demeaning and pathetic thing, but rather as a Holy and life affirming response to how God has created the world.
3. We recognise that Christ is our teacher, AND that he has ordained through his word that men and women relate this way.
So then that leaves theme 3 ( childbirth) v15
This verse sounds unusual upon first reading. It appears to be saying that childbirth has something to do with a woman's salvation, it seems to run contrary to the understanding that we are saved only though the death of Jesus Christ, which takes away our sins. It also seems to say that a woman's good works - her "faith and love and holiness, with self control"- somehow contribute to her salvation. Sooo what is this verse actually saying?
So read Gen 3:15-16, 1 Corinthians 11:11-12, 1 Tim 5:9-10 and Rev 12:1-6
So having mentioned Eves sin in 1 tim 2:14, Paul seems to be making it clear in v15 that women certainly can be saved. Their salvation is strangely expressed- "through child bearing"- but it is surely promised. There are 3 ways one can understand that verse.
1. Christian woman will not die during the birth of a child, well since Paul uses the verb "saved" in a spiritual sense referring to redemption, that understanding of the verse is unlikely. It's also not in order with the more immediate context in which salvation by the gospel is on view in verses 3-7.
2. That salvation comes through the birth of the Child. Paul may be saying that women, like everyone else, are saved from sin through Jesus, who was born of a woman. It may be pointing to Gen 3:15, where it is promised that Eves son will crush the serpents head. If the woman continues as a believer, with faith, love and holiness, she shares in the salvation secured by the Son of Eve. This interpretation comes from understanding salvation in a spiritual sense, as it ties it to Christ and fits in with the context of v 14-15.
3. Women will be saved by bearing children, parts of 1 Tim describe the lifestyle of a Christian woman (2:9-15, 5:3-16) in that it involves propriety, submission, hospitality, good deeds and having children. Motherhood in other words, is a good deed of a godly woman. It is an expression of living a Holy life in faith and love. V 15 could be saying that by having children and raising them well, a woman "works out" her salvation, akin to Philippians 2:12-13. It is not that she must bear children I order to be saved, but that bringing up children is a godly way for a saved woman to live. This again takes the word 'saved' in a spiritual sense and fits nicely with the context of v9-14 also noting the repetition of 'self-control' in v's 9 and 15. This also fits with Paul's teaching elsewhere in 1 tim 5:14 and Titus 2:4-5, where childhood are seen as a godly path of life for the Christian woman.
It's difficult to discern between the latter two understandings as both are consistent with other teachings in 1 Tim and in the rest of the bible. Both fit the context of 1 Tim 2:9-15 and both point in the direction of Christ and living a life that pleases him.
So all that being said is Paul dealing with a specific problem in Ephesus at the time of Paul's writing ? Clearly not as it spans all time and is about eternity not just Ephesus, it is clearly a continuum of Gods creation and word.
Is it saying that women should never teach anyone, because they are easily deceived ? No because it says women may teach women and children, it's just saying women were not to teach man from the pulpit.
Is it saying Paul doesn't like women ? Well clearly no it as Paul is following Gods word.
Is it saying well uno things are quite different now because women are better educated and on an equal standing with men in society's eyes ? No, as things have not changed in Gods world.
The teaching in 1 Timothy 2:18-15 has implications today and those that seek to implement their own agenda are not being obedient to Gods word and his instructions to his church and we all know how that worked out for Adam and Eve xx
I think when something is written in the Bible, we should be careful how we debate it. Looking closely, it's apparent that the pushing of women ordination rose sharply up parallel to the feminist movement. The Church failed to discern the craftness of the devil. The Church is different from the world, and the feminist movement was not of God ~ it was about swapping the roles instead of fairness. We were created for different roles, and the Church should not fall under pressure by social norms.
God created us, women differently in that we women are emotional beings. We do things differently because of that. For example we love beautiful things and we tend to not look beyond when we are taken in with beautiful things. That is why we are good homemakers.
Going back to Eve, Paul wrote that it was not Adam who was deceived but Eve. Eve fell under the beauty of the forbidden tree and reasoned that it was good to eat. Adam on the other hand abandoned his roll to protect his wife and passively stood by.
We must acknowledge that all Churches that have women in Church leadership now have the fruit of liberalism. The LGBTQetc community deeply uses emotions to gain favour and their message does not depend on reason and godly submission to God, but their emotions that attract women ministers to compromise the Gospel. This is a naked truth. Unless the Church look their sin in the eye and repent, nothing is left but total collapse of the Church. God will raise up other voices that are obedient to Him. But as it were there are always "old Prophets" that await in shadows to try to destroy them.
Does it bother you that your Bishop doesn't show up? I know lots of clergy here get upset by the lack of attention they get, but equally I imagine some like the space.
So is there no altruism in American immigration policy?
Altruism is different than not enforcing the law, and extending welfare to every person on the planet that can get to the United States. Altruism is fixing our own problems before inviting in the world's problems.
and the meaning of "decimated" is?
A point to note in the Pope Francis quote regarding 'all religions arrive at God': Maybe he was indicating that those who have a belief in God, or a God, acknowledge an existence of God, and that we cannot dismiss the possibility that there may be elements of divine revelation contained within these alternative belief systems. Note, the Pope does not mention here the all important aspect of salvation. He speaks of different avenues arriving at God, but not that they may lead to salvation. I firmly believe that the Bible is the only true source of the divinely inspired word of God which reveals the true nature of God and the fallen nature of humanity which can only be saved (in order to achieve our goal of eternal life) through faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. Yes, he is the only guaranteed way to eternal life, not forgetting that Jesus Christ is in fact God incarnate. So, in effect. it is faith in God - as revealed in the Christian faith alone - that assures our redemption and salvation. No other religion offers, or even accepts that. Yes, we are all God's children, but Gods urgent message is that we all need embrace and accept Christ's sacrifice and repent of our sins in order to become right with God. But what about all those millions of people who lived before the arrival of Jesus? What about all the decent, loving, caring people that may have led honest, charitable lives? Or what about the mentally impaired? Are they all damned and to be thrown into the depths of hell? Of course not. We can all take comfort in knowing that God is merciful, loving, compassionate and righteous, and that we can trust in His final judgement and blessing, just as He revealed to Abraham many years before the arrival of Jesus.
When talking about immigrants, I didn't hear you mention Republicans turning down an agreement they had with Democrats on immigration. because that's what Trump told them to do. (Do you think that's true?) I am sure it wasn't perfect or something that would satisfy everyone but let us know what you found so unacceptable about it. Also, I'd like to hear your comments on the threats of violence that occurred in Springfield, Ohio due to Trump's claims about immigrants there. By the way, Charleroi, PA had some fallout from Trump's comments also. You could have driven down there from Latrobe. It's less than an hour away. To be a little more positive, I did enjoy some of your videos explaining the Episcopal Church.
The Democrats deal said that laws would only be enforced after 3,500 people a day had entered illegally. That's one million, three hundred thousand people a year before the lawless Biden administration promises to try to begin to enforce the country's laws, and fulfill their oaths to enforce laws enacted democratically by Congress. That's surrender now, with an empty promise for later.
George left out the crucial remark that Pope Francis made and that has been misquoted. Pope Francis was speaking in Italian to an interreligious group at a Catholic Junior College in Singapore. A cardinal sitting beside translated what the Pope was saying into English. If you examine the videos, the cardinal's translation of the controversial remark is, "All religions are a way to arrive at God." If you consider the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate, what Pope Francis said seems not very aberrant: "The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men." It reflects the thinking of Continental Roman Catholic theologians whom I have read, e.g. the Dutch Catechism. Traditional Latin Mass people have not only been misquoting what the pope said but magnifying it out of proportion. They have a grudge against the pope anyway. (By the way, I am very critical of Pope Francis's ambivalence on morals. He is no favorite. However, let's be accurate.) 🤔
Open up your eyes and let the truth shine in. Religious indifference is a bench mark of his Papacy. fellow Catholic.
@@MichaelReilly-r7h Would you say the same about St. Paul at the Areopagus (Acts 17.22-31)?🤔
@@royquick-s5n Yes if it were true
I speak Italian. I watched the video. And here is the English translation from the Vatican website: "This is very important because if you start arguing, “My religion is more important than yours...,” or “Mine is the true one, yours is not true....,” where does this lead? Somebody answer. [A young person answers, “Destruction”.] That is correct. All religions are paths to God. I will use an analogy, they are like different languages that express the divine. But God is for everyone, and therefore, we are all God’s children. “But my God is more important than yours!”. Is this true? There is only one God, and religions are like languages, paths to reach God. Some Sikh, some Muslim, some Hindu, some Christian. Understood?"
No pope in 2000 years has ever said that. It's pretty clear material heresy of indifferentism.
@@polemeros A blogger on another site wrote out what Pope Francis said in Italian and pointed out that some are leaving out an Italian word or two when they say he said, "All religions are paths to God." It obviously is not the translation which the cardinal gave. In a Vatican News report dated September 13, 2024, by Deborah Castellano Lubov, titled Pope Calls Singaporean Youth To Unity, Lubov quoted the pope as saying. "All religions are paths to reach God." She said he continued, "They are--to make a comparison-like different languages, different dialects to get there. But God is God for everyone." You wouldn't be, by coincidence, an advocate of the Traditional Latin Mass?
No mention of the very racist lie about cats and dogs? The Haitians in Springfield are here legally.
What makes it legal is that it is under a special program of the Democratic Administration, a program that may be viewed with how the same administration has been controlling immigration generally, e.g. the southern border.
It's a joke!!
So you're one of those who don't mind that your country is being destroyed, as long as it is done legally. Great. PS. And "racist" is nothing more than fake term to scare Whites.
@@royquick-s5nyeah, but no, it's a Republican Thing guides.loc.gov/latinx-civil-rights/tps
@davidknox5929 why is it "a joke"? Have you ever met a Haitian person?
Murphy is still in his church.His anti woman clergy is awful!
"His anti woman clergy"? Do not understand.
Called women clergy witches
@@davidknox5929 There is a phenomenon known to those with experience in deliverance ministry of psychic and demonised women who seek to dominate and manipulate. Often open to all sorts of occultic influences - women generally seem to be more susceptable to this - and making God feminine.
It might well be Murphy is referring to such as being 'witches'. He is pretty clued up on spiritual warfare without being over the top about it.
They certainly can be found amongst charismatics and pentecostals, sometimes hiding behind a hen-pecked husband. They can do an immense amount of damage. An Anglican vicar friend of mine used to call them 'pentecostal witrches'!
@@davidknox5929False. He called some specific women in the radical feminist group WATCH who literally pray to Mother Goddesses and Spirits of the trees etc.. Witches.
@@davidknox5929 Obviously calling women clergy names would not seem to be appropriate, if that were the case, but look at the reply of mrsvicar.
Do you want a prosecutor or a felon
A prosecutor can only ever see one side of something.
You are alluding to Trump's being a felon. It may seem to some that he is a felon out of politically motivated prosecutions to discredit him, character assassination, before an election. Why were not the prosecutions made at the time of the alleged offenses?
A felon? Jesus was a felon - did you know the Romans actually sentenced him to death? You'll never guess what happened next . . . Would you side with Pontius Pilate or Jesus? Me, I'll go with the felon!
Please be neutral on politics
Being neutral on politics may mean to some, do not apply Christian morals to politics or, if you do, keep it to yourself, which those who would not benefit from the application of Christian morals do not want others to see. The LBJ Administration tried to use Internal Revenue to silence clergy and laity.🤔
Failure to call out evil is not being neutral in politics. Failure to call out evil is not being prophetic.