Budget Magic: $92 (13 tix) Mono-Red Frenzy (Modern)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @blong217
    @blong217 6 ปีที่แล้ว +254

    Good God that game one. Jesus, that player had a family.

  • @XxMechaxWolfxX
    @XxMechaxWolfxX 6 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    Remember that you can cast instants off the top before your draw step! Seeing you draw lightning bolt was big sad

    • @joeys776
      @joeys776 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Maurice Hickey That lonely forgotten upkeep stop :(

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Oops!

  • @ThomasJohnsen2
    @ThomasJohnsen2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Dude. Every single Against the Odds or Budget deck is a thrill to watch. Your enthusiasm, commentary, pronunciations, card-choices etc. etc. - easily 10/10 for me. Doesn't much matter if you win or loose; you make every janky deck fun. Watching your content means a great deal to me; you can light up the darkest and saddest days.

  • @keep7smiling
    @keep7smiling 6 ปีที่แล้ว +32

    Seth, you are allowed to swing with creatures, even if it isn't lethal immediately. When you have roughly 10000 attackers and the opponent has to trade his entire board to stay alive, it is totally worth it. Just swing the next turn again.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      But frenzy!

    • @JacoDeltaco
      @JacoDeltaco 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish But winning

  • @ExKiwi-yw8er
    @ExKiwi-yw8er 6 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    PLEASE play a non budget version of this list some time. For a stream maybe?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

      We can play the non-budget build on stream, I've been playing it for fun anyway.

    • @ceesbuijteweg3404
      @ceesbuijteweg3404 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish For fun he said after a 2-5 or something in a live stream... this deck is fun but it sucks!

  • @seanhenry5167
    @seanhenry5167 6 ปีที่แล้ว +185

    You cast 36 Mana worth of spells AND paid for a Spell Pierce in game 1

    • @sydm1073
      @sydm1073 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      spoilers dude

    • @recycletoad
      @recycletoad 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Who reads the comments before watching the video?

    • @aaronnava5656
      @aaronnava5656 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@recycletoadPlus he did mention the 36 mana on Twitter a few days back

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@recycletoad me

  • @samueldionne9675
    @samueldionne9675 6 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    This deck is going to get tweaked a lot and become really good. I'm just reading through the comments right now and there are some really interesting suggestions to try out.
    Battle Hymn and Haze of Rage could also be potential includes, though Haze of Rage is more of an overkill card than anything.

    • @qwormuli77
      @qwormuli77 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, a haze in your deck might make only 5-6 creatures lethal, meaning less merfolk games, plus that buyback could be utilized pretty well in this deck.

    • @alesandroaaa
      @alesandroaaa 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Battle hymn seems pretty spicy, doesn't really help cast frenzy in the first place though

    • @wshayne
      @wshayne 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@qwormuli77 although buyback doesn't work well with frenzy

    • @qwormuli77
      @qwormuli77 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wshayne Oh yeah, there's that... But then again, when you have the mana for it, you have the mana to sac frenzy and go to face.

    • @pabloperazamartinez3822
      @pabloperazamartinez3822 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haze of Rage seems very interesting, with just some creatures and enough mana to buypack it and cast it again you can make the atack lethal.

  • @jacejames3853
    @jacejames3853 6 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    if this deck wasn't budget wouldn't you add fetch lands so that you have less lands to hit with experimental frenzy

    • @justwantawholename
      @justwantawholename 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      The real question is how many fetches. 8?

    • @SilverAlex92
      @SilverAlex92 6 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      on no budget, I would play like 10 fetches. Having a fetch to shuffle the frenzy is so valuable that the loss of life is totally worth it

    • @richardrocha2503
      @richardrocha2503 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      8 fetch and maybe a number of Insolent Neonate to help cycle through lands. This deck looks insanely fun!

    • @DualSwordBesken
      @DualSwordBesken 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @@richardrocha2503 I would suspect Manamorphose would get some slots before Neonate.

    • @maxbloomfield540
      @maxbloomfield540 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

      And let it be known that red fetches can find madblind because it has the mountain subtype

  • @gastastrophe1092
    @gastastrophe1092 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    It's kind of like those glimpse of nature decks that got banned out, but mono red and slow enough to be fair.

  • @xfrostylemon68x
    @xfrostylemon68x 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Really loved the deck. I don't play modern but I have the 8 wackers, 4 bolts, and 2 frenzy's. So I might go out and build the deck. Loved the vid! Thank you Seth!

  • @justatraveler09
    @justatraveler09 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I feel like the deck definitely wants Faithless Looting to dig for frenzy. Plus, like another person said, Skirk Prospector is better than Cantor.
    We've really come far from the days of GRN spoiler season where people thought the best use to frenzy was to donate it to your opponent...

    • @Germynator31
      @Germynator31 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Would Dark-Dweller Oracle be another goblin to stop fizzling?

    • @emoryhotchkiss9088
      @emoryhotchkiss9088 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think skirky is better than the 3 drop 2/1 guy thing. Cuz ? Cantor is still a 1 drop

    • @rexone9564
      @rexone9564 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Noah Massaro faithless is dead card under frenzy.

    • @x3mskbord
      @x3mskbord 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rexone9564 then how about insolent neonate? Can sac it early to dig for a frenzy, sac it while frenzy is out to a draw a land that's on top of your library, and otherwise a 1 drop creature with menace

    • @Germynator31
      @Germynator31 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@rexone9564 but it's flashback is useful under frenzy

  • @Blackjack9W7
    @Blackjack9W7 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    That Terminus miracle destroyed a tiny bit of my soul

    • @pa_3op
      @pa_3op 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As well as significant part of Seth's body, as it sounds

    • @theMightyMonarch88
      @theMightyMonarch88 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Miracles make me want to flip tables, for sure

    • @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761
      @drakeconsumerofsoulsandche5761 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@theMightyMonarch88 our playgroup is filled with it, but my deck really couldn't care less.

  • @meatscraps
    @meatscraps 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I'm really excited that I'm not the only person who thought of Madblind Mountain with experimental frenzy

  • @Canadian_Ry
    @Canadian_Ry 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This deck was extra awesome to watch in action! The highs and lows had me on the edge of my seat!!

  • @Leon-ou3nl
    @Leon-ou3nl 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Spell Pierce: One Blue Mana Instant: Destroy 3 Lands xD

  • @rjphilla
    @rjphilla 6 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    Oof so many misplays in game two 😂 AND please swing with pumped up Steamkins they're like 6/4 and he removed counters.

    • @outshimed
      @outshimed 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I kept yelling to stop trying to combo and swing, he left so much damage on the table by removing counters and whiffing in multiple games

    • @rjphilla
      @rjphilla 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Still a sweet deck though

  • @JakeMC521
    @JakeMC521 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Seth, you have to start waiting for at least Nourishing Shoal or something in game one. The opponent wasn't even at starting life total so it was even less likely that they would've won. I'm not saying sit through the entire combo but at least try to play the percentage points combo decks give you.

  • @ricardoarroyo8182
    @ricardoarroyo8182 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had a great time watching you play that crazy deck, that was awesome. I wouldve been so salty over the lands and the terminus lol

  • @WellThatsRidiculous
    @WellThatsRidiculous 6 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    In game 2 could you not cast devastating summons while on top, x being 0? Love your content.

    • @Volvary
      @Volvary 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Yes he could have.

    • @ahunter7563
      @ahunter7563 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      "but why? why would you do that?"

    • @Volvary
      @Volvary 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ahunter7563 To not have to waste a Relic or madblind mountain? Mana is a lot more plentiful in that deck than shuffles/draws.

    • @ahunter7563
      @ahunter7563 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Volvary was a joke and a jontron quote..

  • @maxsternburg1956
    @maxsternburg1956 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Please play a non-budget version of this. Please.

  • @daqqer1985
    @daqqer1985 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    29:15 - That was a mighty impressive FERPORMANCE! XD

  • @Kurse_of_Kall
    @Kurse_of_Kall 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    13 tix LOL it's going to be at least 30 in a few days, thanks seth.
    *edit* it's at 25 already XD
    *edit #2* eyyyy 31.62 tix as of 12/5/18

  • @rkinn1998
    @rkinn1998 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    For a no budget version would fetchlands and surgicals be good in the main cause surgical would be a redraw while going off that you could target your own fetches with to thin and shuffle your deck and worry less about lands being stuck on top

  • @boontish1104
    @boontish1104 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1:06:18
    "Miracle giving a whole new meaning to the term miracle"
    -Sethbetterknownassaffronolive

  • @peterbillings3276
    @peterbillings3276 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is so sweet! Even though you got such bad luck (impossible land streaks & perfect terminus top decks), but the deck STILL put up an impressive fight, even in those situations!

  • @wesleymcdonald1727
    @wesleymcdonald1727 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Manamorphose is a must add to the non budget version it helps us cycle as well as preserve mana in the early game and is just a free card in the late game

    • @KebbieG
      @KebbieG 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wouldn't the draw hurt after you start Frenzying?

    • @cameronhendricks5967
      @cameronhendricks5967 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@KebbieG Naw. You manamorphose when you hit the second land

    • @firstandlast.1254
      @firstandlast.1254 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@cameronhendricks5967 as in, cast manamorphose from your hand to draw the second land and keep the frenzy going? That doesn't work, and I'm not sure what else you could mean. Manamorphose is not great with frenzy.

    • @KebbieG
      @KebbieG 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@cameronhendricks5967 You won't know what is under the Manamorphose when it is on the top of your deck.

  • @pikachucknorris5441
    @pikachucknorris5441 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Flamekin harbinger may be insane in this deck since you can get the full playset or a runaway steamkin once frenzy is out :)))

    • @XDIcarus
      @XDIcarus 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Frenzying into Flamekin followed by Steam-Kin from the top would increase consistency of the deck by an insane margin.

  • @igleteli
    @igleteli 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What an amazing deck you pulled off, some few tweaks and can reach full potential

  • @Thoraxe5150_
    @Thoraxe5150_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    What about borderposts to cut down on basic lands even more? They would be 1 mana to try a redraw just like the relic.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Borderposts are interesting. We can't replay the land, but it is basically like a tapped land we can play during the frenzy.

  • @jackpabich763
    @jackpabich763 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    54:13 Yes Seth, they ARE playing against you. I love the thought that people play you and instantly fear the Blood Moon.

  • @ItaliansShredsBetter
    @ItaliansShredsBetter 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, this seems like one of the most powerful budget deck you've ever built. Congrats! Also, I feel like you're using frenzy just as R&D intended.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      It does seem like a pretty fair frenzy deck, that just happens to be extremely unfair when it's working right.

  • @theeechad69
    @theeechad69 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love burning tree from standard and I love it to this day !!!!!

    • @brendanerickson2363
      @brendanerickson2363 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Burning tree is such a spicy card. I loved playing with it during theros standard.

  • @ehallam08
    @ehallam08 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is absolutely ridiculously amazing. Frenzy and steam kin are my favorite cards from guilds.

  • @jholopez1993
    @jholopez1993 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please make the non-budget version man!!!!!! Fetches in this build for a shuffle factor looks so great!!!!!!!!

  • @FnordKyuss
    @FnordKyuss 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    8 whack! Seth you make my day when you play decks like this. 8 whack week please plz plz.

  • @malikismyname
    @malikismyname 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wau... so awsome that wotc gave you that card to spoil and also you unveiled its full potential in modern! You rock!:)

  • @danielegiuntini8844
    @danielegiuntini8844 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That Hollow One starter vert well, but TH-cam inverted the race! What a comeback!

  • @luliby2309
    @luliby2309 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not too long ago in Standard, I faced a Mono-red Aggro deck that managed to get out three Steam-Kins with Frenzy and it was madness. I lost so hard. It was gross to see aggro get so much value.
    This is basically what happened that game but supercharged with Modern choices. This could be a real thing.
    Agree with others that a full version would have red fetches to thin lands and that Skirk Prospector should replace Wild Cantor.
    Also I'm not too sure what Devastating Summons is doing in the deck. I think those should just be the Faithless Lootings.
    Awesome deck!

  • @Macro11Underscore1
    @Macro11Underscore1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally, a good use for my madblind mountains! (love that card)

  • @teamnormie9235
    @teamnormie9235 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Could i side Grapeshot in this deck? Because im gonna build this. I have 90% of the cards.

    • @brandonstickle1404
      @brandonstickle1404 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      When I played a jhoira storm deck with artifacts that used grapeshot as it's wincon, I had issues running into land.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      You could try Grapeshot. It seems good if we hit it at the right time (but it's clunky early in the frenzy).

    • @teamnormie9235
      @teamnormie9235 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      So maybe 2-3 copies to keep down its clunkiness?

    • @theMightyMonarch88
      @theMightyMonarch88 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would be an excellent side in against Ensnaring Bridge decks along with the Smashes

    • @teamnormie9235
      @teamnormie9235 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Totally.

  • @colgatelampinen2501
    @colgatelampinen2501 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Noxious Revival is pretty good with Frenzy.

  • @LapahnYT
    @LapahnYT 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    19:25 is lethal if you sac both enchantments so u can lightning bolt the face, if it's a counter u win anyway, if it's a creature you win with exact 16 dmg

  • @biomancer3166
    @biomancer3166 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    OMG, I need that mug from the thumbnail 😍
    This is why I believe the term degenerate exists 😁

  • @lucantonelli7069
    @lucantonelli7069 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Would it not be good to play faithless looting in this deck? get rid of lands and dig for frenzy?

    • @zacharychanoi7544
      @zacharychanoi7544 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Luc Antonelli drawing cards isn’t too good with a frenzy out.

    • @SassyBanjo
      @SassyBanjo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@zacharychanoi7544 drawing cards is a great way to get rid of lands off the top though

    • @alesandroaaa
      @alesandroaaa 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Seth does mention maybe adding faithless looting at one point in the vid

  • @raiynen
    @raiynen 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    wand of vertebrae is super good with experimental frenzy.

  • @jacktorborg9862
    @jacktorborg9862 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Instead of Madblind Mountain for budget shuffleland, I've been using Jund Panorama. It works REALLY well, untap land most of the time and can crack it like relic any time to get a real mountain, and shuffle.

  • @cloksatotalslam5941
    @cloksatotalslam5941 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is nuts. Super off the wall and super agro which means super hard to figure out game 1 and winning game 1 makes the set so much in your favor

  • @e-frame4675
    @e-frame4675 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Play Fetchlands, Skirk Prospector, Faithless Looting, 1-2 Devil's Play and maybe add manamorphose or Battle Hymn. I would Love to see a very explosive Version with Spitit Guides and Pact of the Titan, but it wouldn't be very effective i guess

  • @jackpabich763
    @jackpabich763 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lol. The funniest Spell Pierce I can remember in quite some time.

  • @natoraishido
    @natoraishido 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jesus that Terminus triggered me for you Seth.

  • @gman8133
    @gman8133 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is quality stuff Seth! Love this deck

  • @Hyenadont
    @Hyenadont 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    game 2 was agonising. Seth, you don't need to kill in one hit! you can attack with most of your team, kill some/most of theirs, still have blockers, then kill on the next turn. That is a thing you can do in magic! I know it feels good to be able to combo out, as I used to play storm, play food chain in canlander, and flash hulk in auslander (yes i get it im a bad man), but the end goal is to win (all the better if you have fun along the way). I'm sure the opponent was wondering for some time why he wasn't dead yet. By the time you said "I think we might have him" leading on to the "dead please?" you had so much power in play that they went to -21 after all blocks. 37 unblocked damage. Sometimes you're a genius seth, and others...

  • @Pacuvio25
    @Pacuvio25 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think you should kick the bushwhacker when alone or with one creature which can already attack. You waste one precious mana which can be useful, as in match 5, game 1.

  • @ThatGinger29
    @ThatGinger29 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seth at 19:25 it was lethal through everything except trickster as long as you popped both Frenzys to cast bolt in case of a new blocker

  • @LeKrutes
    @LeKrutes 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool and fun deck. Would be a blast to play. Neonate and skirk prospecter look beter in the deck.
    Maby something like elixir of. Immortality could be good a shuffle and makes shure you have more "spels" in your deck.

  • @ronanobrien88
    @ronanobrien88 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    needs more haze of rage! Love the deck!

  • @levijackson7622
    @levijackson7622 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is awesome. Love the deck

  • @MasterQuestMaster
    @MasterQuestMaster 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Steamkin is soo good!
    I would probably play a 2-of Grapeshot in the list, it can just accidentally win the game as well.

  • @aiden1347
    @aiden1347 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You know I think you could add green for Azusa to play more lands or at least some fetches to thin the deck or at least shuffle away a land on top

  • @SlaRs133
    @SlaRs133 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Terminus on the second control game... gotdang

  • @SilverAlex92
    @SilverAlex92 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well, this deck looks like it has so much room to improve! Im thinking of Skirt Prospetor over the Cantors, so we can sac other goblins for mana and Insolent Neonate for a free loot. Right now my biggest concern is being able to find Frenzy and play it fast as concistent as possible, but besides faithless looting (which has the side benefit of flashback, so you could use it to advance through a land on the top of the deck) I can't think of anything else to cycle through our deck pre frenzy

  • @kennystorgel686
    @kennystorgel686 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would really love seeing the non budget version of this deck, looks pretty fun to play

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Non-budget isn't too different, the big change is fetchlands (which are super helpful for shuffling).

    • @kennystorgel686
      @kennystorgel686 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MTGGoldfish is there anything to replace devastating summons maybe?

  • @stoneman289
    @stoneman289 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck with fetches and looting (or neonate) is the actual nuts

  • @yote3929
    @yote3929 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PLEASE UPDATE THIS DECK I LOVE IT

  • @lavetha27
    @lavetha27 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Edit: Just saw your non-budget version. I like a couple of Faithless Looting seems good both to find a frenzy and to break up lands when going off. I also think that fetchlands will improve your going off rate tremendously for the shuffle. I think Memnite/Infernal Plunge and Relic are the most expendable slots. Memnite isn't red and cannot be used to ramp into Frenzy. I'd cut that package for Skirk Prospector and 2x Faithless Looting. Relic is good both for the meta and help shuffle but idk if 4x is necessary and maybe I'd consider cutting 1-2 for Pyretic Ritual to replace the Infernal Plunge. I think ditching the Memnites for Skirk Prospector, getting rid of that whole package, getting fetchlands, and a couple Faithless Looting will dramatically decrease the deck's fail rate.

  • @QuestionMarc
    @QuestionMarc 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm just wishing you could play Wooded Foothills, but obviously that wouldn't be budget. Just it would help a TON!

  • @giantewok
    @giantewok 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    When I was looking at this list my mind started churning about playing experimental frenzy in this kind of shell with either more artifacts like codex shredder, lantern of insight & signal pest to help control top of library to go more in on combo killing of going hella aggro playing fetches/shocks/fast lands with 4x surgical extractions to remove your own non-basics to to thin out the library even further & thus reduce whiffing

  • @NF-nv3xw
    @NF-nv3xw 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a amazing deck, if this was on MTGA i bet you would hit those triple, quad lands in a row.

  • @epocheo
    @epocheo 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    That terminus miracle is just karma being returned from that one time you miracles that 5 damage burn spell for the win way back when during that ogre trapping draft deck

  • @gavinzurmely7998
    @gavinzurmely7998 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    32:10 I didn’t know people could panic as much as Seth did over a clump if lands. Jesus, it sounded like he had a b asthma attack

  • @XaviFornells
    @XaviFornells 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seth the deck is really sweet but I think playing conjurer's bauble and skirk prospector would make it more consistent and awesome, think in that. You could cut infernal plunge for example.
    1 or 2 copys of haze of rage can be an awesome option too

  • @TheEdgedCarbine
    @TheEdgedCarbine 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A copy or two of shrine of burning rage might be good in this deck.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ohh, that could be sweet.

  • @Leb4life14
    @Leb4life14 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Gaah the Punt game 2 against Infect! You could have electrickery the Noble and attacked for lethal...

  • @crazyj6056
    @crazyj6056 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seth I bought this deck online at card kingdom and it came yesterday I played it tonight which is Friday I went 2-2 because our f&m is modern first match I played against blue white spirits he went 2-1 next game dredge with artifact hate 2-1 round 3 I got the by last round blue white control my turn to play on that on the first game burning tree into burning tree into desperate ritual casting reckless bushwacker basically making my opponent lose I'm game to I won easily this deck is a fun deck I'm liking it so far I took out the devastating summons and the infernal plunge and put those in the sideboard to put the lightning bolts in Maine board is better

  • @cahiboy
    @cahiboy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Been having luck using flame jab with frenzy and steam kin. Might be worth consideration. Def want the looting though.

  • @DiogoVKersting
    @DiogoVKersting 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Faithless Looting even has the benefit of being cast from the GW through Frenzy (which would be a 3 mana way to remove a land from the top and trigger steam-kin).
    To be honest I feel like Devastating Summons is worse than a burning spell in this deck... If you don't have "Frenzy" in play or some bushwhacker to kick it does pretty much nothing (i.e. win-more), and even if you have bushwhacker but not enough lands it also does nothing. On top of that, when it's finally cast it can be game-losing if countered.
    The deck is pretty sweet, though.

  • @kayssj2
    @kayssj2 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Also dont forget that you can still cast cards from the graveyard, so faithless looting goes in perfectly with this deck.

  • @guttentard
    @guttentard 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    8:25
    8:25

  • @D_A_D_
    @D_A_D_ 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't help but think a non budget version of this deck playing fetch lands for free shuffles and thinning and maybe splashing something for sideboard cards would be insane

  • @joeyboucree
    @joeyboucree 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fetches could definitely be good in the deck for thinning and shuffling for frenzy.

  • @KDiaz-hy1xx
    @KDiaz-hy1xx 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very worth reworking. Looking forward to a non-budget build on stream or something.

  • @johnnyandthepnuemoni
    @johnnyandthepnuemoni 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    **People putting suggestions for this deck please consider the following**
    1. This deck functions on mana efficiency, if your card is clunky or doesn't help make mana at 3 cmc or higher it's not good.(usually)
    2. If it's not a red card you need to ask yourself does it lend itself to the overall goal of the deck? To put it simply, Frenzy is the engine and Steamkin is the gas man. Spending mana on a card like Azusa does not trigger the gas man nor does it net much mana once it's played. DON'T DO IT. Just play fetches.
    3. Consider the floor of the card rather than the ceiling. As we churn through red spells on might think, "hey we are kinda like storm, let's throw in some Grapeshots." I want you to slow down a minute and remember Frenzy does not let us play from our hand and we are an aggro deck at the core. All our top decks are random and paying 2 mana for a gutshot is feel bad city and the games you're casting 5,6 or 7 spells a turn you are probably already winning.
    I'm sure there are more things to consider but these address most of what I'm seeing in the comments.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is good advice. Fetchlands are the easiest upgrade we can make.

  • @cuddlequeen3225
    @cuddlequeen3225 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck feels sort of like Elfball to me. The “land” hit would be running out of mana to cast Elves with, but Marwyn is sort of like Steamkin. And the draw cards are like the Frenzy.

  • @lifeofasalesman01
    @lifeofasalesman01 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Perhaps Ghoulcaller’s Bell would be more advantageous than mainboard relic. Yeah having graveyard hate in the main is nice but it may mean sacrificing better options.

  • @HELLICRINATIOn
    @HELLICRINATIOn 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    G2 of game 5, I you scooped far to early, you were under no pressure and had 2 bolts in your deck, as well as 6 haste creatures.

  • @Indomakio
    @Indomakio 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wowza, this deck is GAS!! Have you considered playing Molten Vortex to get rid of the excess of lands and maybe a copy of Grapeshot? Also, I endorse the Faithless Looting consideration.

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hmm, Molten Vortex is spike, I hasn't though about that.

  • @joehemmann1156
    @joehemmann1156 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Needs a fun of Haze of Rage.

  • @themarcazard
    @themarcazard 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seth is the lowkey master of broken red decks hahaha

  • @connorharris1806
    @connorharris1806 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think if you are going to add faithless looting, arclight pheonix might need to come in too. You might not reach the threshold of spells needed for the pheonix though. Maybe since your hand matters very little, burning inquiry could come in but then you might just be a medium hollow one deck. Be interesting to brew around with.

  • @LogoMotive11
    @LogoMotive11 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seth: *plays another mono red deck*
    Me: "yawn all these mono red decks are the same. Oh well guess ill take a look".
    Seth: 36 mana worth of spells and lethal damage on turn 4.
    Me: *insert pikachu face meme*

  • @LyricBent
    @LyricBent 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing deck! What if you put in a single Grape Shot for incidental storn value?

  • @maiofthefire7144
    @maiofthefire7144 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This. Deck. Is. SWEEEEET!!! Wow!

  • @fanhoop187
    @fanhoop187 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wowzors drawing all your lands and still winning nice 👍

  • @captainpeaches3063
    @captainpeaches3063 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Would you consider the tiniest of green splashes for Wayward Swordtooth, as well as add faithless? I think that could eliminate fizzles and make draws a little bit better.

    • @captainpeaches3063
      @captainpeaches3063 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not to mention wayward turns into a 5/5 with a couple of goblins on board

  • @fateweaver9
    @fateweaver9 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This deck is amazing. I might actually dip into modern with it. Lol

  • @spikevalentine1133
    @spikevalentine1133 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    hi SaffronOlive I hope this message finds you well I must congratulate you on this beautiful creation and I don't have two Madblind Mountain but I do have two Wooded Foothills lying around would it be wise to put them in instead or should I just stick to the original plan and purchase the two Madblind Mountain?

    • @MTGGoldfish
      @MTGGoldfish  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wooded Foothills is fine. Madblind Mountain is a cute budget option, but I think that fetchlands are better.

  • @mirtul1
    @mirtul1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the non budget world, I'd suggest fetchlands, Bloodcrypt and Viscera Seer instead Relic - or perhaps some other card that repeatedly lets you get rid of the top of your library.

  • @mariocastro1540
    @mariocastro1540 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    @mtggoldfish have you considered wand of vertebrae instead of Tormods?

  • @imasiontist653
    @imasiontist653 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This looks super fun

  • @tonyontilt3522
    @tonyontilt3522 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sweet list!