Groff: Making Documents the Unix Way

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 9

  • @peonerovv1770
    @peonerovv1770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thanks! The deepfakes get more and more sophisticated Luke!

  • @user-he4ef9br7z
    @user-he4ef9br7z 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there any advantage over LaTeX (besides faster compile times, which really don't matter)?
    I feel guilty for not using Groff because it's already installed on my system, but I can't find a use case. For documents that are too complex I use LaTeX, for simpler documents, markdown. Is there any use case in which Groff is better than the alternatives?

    • @defnlife1683
      @defnlife1683 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you don't like the verbosity of LaTeX it might make a lot of sense. I like Groff just because it's simpler. It seems saner to me and for my personal usecases. I know the K&R C book was written in Troff.
      But really, it doesn't matter what you use since you just need to use what works for you.

    • @10Xengineering
      @10Xengineering ปีที่แล้ว

      See a mock up CV in the link below to see what GROFF is capable of:
      github.com/Pepe8/GROFF_CV/blob/main/groff_cv.pdf

  • @hansisbrucker813
    @hansisbrucker813 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I can imagine it working really well with M4 macros in your pipeline 🤔

  • @peonerovv1770
    @peonerovv1770 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ignoring my previous comment: I have troubles with hyperlinks in groff. I can't find information on how to integrate them in my text. Should I use groff_www instead of ms? Do you know anything about it?

    • @brycevandegrift
      @brycevandegrift  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I know that "mom" macros have ".PDF_WWW_LINK" for links, but I'm not sure about "ms" macros.

    • @10Xengineering
      @10Xengineering ปีที่แล้ว

      Take a look at the pdfmark macro (URL and PDF LINKS) are taken care of there.
      GROFF is power!

  • @muesique
    @muesique 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Isn't it called heading? A header is at the top margin of the page.