Celestron Upclose G2 10X50 Vs. Celestron Upclose G2 20X50 - Sharpeness & Zooming Power Comparison

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 มิ.ย. 2023
  • A Side by side Sharpeness & Zooming Power Comparison of Celestron Upclose G2 10X50 Vs. Celestron Upclose G2 20X50 - Which is Best?
    CELESTRON Binoculars Links (Buy Link)~
    Celestron Upclose 10X50: amzn.to/49msdsS
    Other Versions:
    Celestron Upclose 20X50: amzn.to/3MweRAi
    Celestron Upclose G2 10-30x50 Binocular: amzn.to/3Mx5PDd
    Celestron Upclose 7X35: amzn.to/47mjoxm
    Other equipment used:
    iPhone11: amzn.to/3pT4L0T
    DIGITEK® (DPTR 605 VD) (183 cm) Professional Heavy Duty Tripod: amzn.to/3rPjxdr
    Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid Video Head 60mm Half Ball -Black:amzn.to/45uLntp
    Note: Above are my affiliate links, when you buy from them I get a small commission which will help me run the channel :) Thank you !!
    #celestron20X50
    #celestron10X50
    #celestronbinoculars
    #binoculars
    ---------------------------------------------
    Celestron Upclose G2 10X50:
    Magnification: 10x
    Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm (1.96")
    Angular Field of View: 6.8°
    Linear Field of View (@1000 yds) / @1000 m): 354 ft (118 m)
    Exit Pupil: 5mm (.19")
    Eye Relief: 12mm (.47")
    Close Focus: 23 ft (7 m)
    Interpupillary Distance (max): 72mm (2.83")
    Interpupillary Distance (min): 56mm (2.20")
    Diopter Adjustment Range: -4 to +8
    Twilight Factor: 22.36
    Relative Brightness: 25
    Lens Coatings: Multi-Coated
    Prism Glass (Type): Bk7
    Prism Coatings: N/A
    Weight: 27 oz (765 g)
    Environmental Protection: Water Resistant
    Nitrogen Filled: No
    Tripod Adaptable: Yes
    Carrying Case: Soft Sided Cloth
    Dimensions: 185mm x 81mm x 160mm (7.3" x 3.2" x 6.3")
    Included Items:
    Carrying case
    Objective covers
    Eyepiece covers
    Lens cloth
    Instruction manual
    ---------------------------------------------
    Celestron Upclose G2 20X50:
    Magnification: 20x
    Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm (1.96")
    Angular Field of View: 3.2°
    Linear Field of View (@1000 yds) / @1000 m): 168 ft (56 m)
    Exit Pupil: 2.5mm (0.1")
    Eye Relief: 7mm (0.27")
    Close Focus: 42 ft (13 m)
    Interpupillary Distance (max): 72mm (2.83")
    Interpupillary Distance (min): 56mm (2.20")
    Diopter Adjustment Range: -4 to +8
    Twilight Factor: 31.62
    Relative Brightness: 6.25
    Lens Coatings: Multi-Coated
    Prism Glass (Type): Bk7
    Prism Coatings: N/A
    Weight: 28 oz (794 g)
    Environmental Protection: Water Resistant
    Nitrogen Filled: No
    Tripod Adaptable: Yes
    Carrying Case: Soft Sided Cloth
    Dimensions: 185mm x 81mm x 160mm (7.3" x 3.2" x 6.3")
    Included Items: Carrying case
    Objective covers
    Eyepiece covers
    Lens cloth
    Instruction manual
    ---------------------------------------------
    Music : Center Ring - Freedom Trail Studio
    Source : TH-cam Audio Library
    Free to use
    For business enquiry:
    Mail me: krishnadebo1958@gmail.com

ความคิดเห็น • 48

  • @Kira-iu2js
    @Kira-iu2js หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey, could you please tell us the negatives if any?

  • @DakaDaki-wd9zc
    @DakaDaki-wd9zc 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you

  • @milroymoses8543
    @milroymoses8543 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice comparison

  • @caledonia3390
    @caledonia3390 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice comparison

  • @QuangMinhParsnip
    @QuangMinhParsnip ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can you come back to making videos about chemistry experiments? I miss it a lot🥺

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you so much for your request 🙏
      I'm currently not in my home town. I will start making my experiment videos as soon as possible.

  • @tucoramirez5674
    @tucoramirez5674 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    fajne porównanie dzięki

  • @T2EH1N
    @T2EH1N 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, I want to know does the 10x50 fit for watching a concert? The concert is set in Tokyo Dome

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Definitely, but it will be bit heavy to hold for a long time.
      For watching concerts, please try nikon 8x21 binoculars for best results 🙏

    • @T2EH1N
      @T2EH1N 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks for the quick response and suggest🙏🏻🙏🏻

  • @moulalikannur1594
    @moulalikannur1594 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sar great quality great

  • @Lrxkid
    @Lrxkid หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you tell me best binoculars under 5k for long distance and night sky viewing?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Under 5k, celestron will be the best choice 🙏

  • @osmanioriccioppo3685
    @osmanioriccioppo3685 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Obrigado!

  • @anshusharma1523
    @anshusharma1523 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should I go for a Nikon 10-22×50 or Celestron 20×50 ? What will be the pros and cons of each?
    How much would be the difference in quality and clarity in between a 10-22×50 zoom binoculars from Kson and Nikon?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Nikon offers best optic quality than celestron.

  • @Ragingcap1212
    @Ragingcap1212 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is the stand necessary to ise the binoculors..?

    • @hamletcabrerart
      @hamletcabrerart 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      If you use stand for 20x you’ll enjoy a steady view and easy to leave fixated rather than to have to find same spot over and over, but neither are as heavy or uncomfortable to hold as the SkyMasters series, so not really necessary, is just better!

    • @Ragingcap1212
      @Ragingcap1212 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@hamletcabrerart thanks for the information mate..!

  • @rodrigoanavalon
    @rodrigoanavalon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only thing is that binoculars are looking at different buildings. But I get the point of the video, thanks.

    • @shreyasdharashivkar8027
      @shreyasdharashivkar8027 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am Sorry for your observation skills, they are exactly the same building. Look closely

    • @garywillacey9979
      @garywillacey9979 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's the same building. Your observation isn't very good.

  • @hemantodeb5025
    @hemantodeb5025 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you explain that a 20×50 needs a tripod?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      More than 10x magnification needs tripod for best viewing experience 🙏

  • @Dampyr94
    @Dampyr94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should i go for 10x50 or 20x50 for watching the sky?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Both are good, each have their own pros and cons. 20x has double magnification but half light gathering ability compared to 10x50 and also the fov is less in 20x50. In my opinion you can try 10x50🙏

    • @Dampyr94
      @Dampyr94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Pracitcalscience So, basically image is sharper on 10x50?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely sir 🙏

    • @Dampyr94
      @Dampyr94 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks brother. Cheers from Serbia 🙏

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome sir 🙏

  • @Carlos-dq8wo
    @Carlos-dq8wo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Genial!!!!

  • @krishangopalsharma9510
    @krishangopalsharma9510 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shall I go for 20×50

    • @TheClassicWeebNo
      @TheClassicWeebNo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Late reply but, it depends on what you want to view. If it's for bird watching then I suggest using 20x50 if it's for astronomy then 10x50 is good as u can even see the craters on the moon with it (not clearly ofc). Their pretty much the same but 20x50 is a better option

    • @vorox7658
      @vorox7658 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheClassicWeebNodoes the bigger magnification not able to see the skyobject clearly

    • @TheClassicWeebNo
      @TheClassicWeebNo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vorox7658 you can see it more zoomed but u won't get a wider angle. Suppose u wanted to look st the Orion belt, in the smaller magnification lens I can see all the 3 stats together but in the bigger one you might get only 2 stars in vision because it will be more zoomed. Also I suggest u use the celestron binoculars because the company even makes telescopes, I recently bought the 10x50 binoculars of theirs and here's what I can see:
      -the moon
      -more stars as u look into the sky
      -planets (but only the colour it's not strong enough to see the planets itself)
      -Orion nebula (I'm in a light polluted area and yet I can see the Orion nebulas main stars not the gases and stuff but it's very cool)
      I saw the other one in astrobiscuits video on yt, if u go to a clear place u can see the sndromeda galaxy too.
      I suggest 10x50 as u get a wider angle and better understanding, others can only be used for seeing the moon closer, or the nebulas closer.

    • @who-Am-I-Here
      @who-Am-I-Here 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

      ​@@vorox7658actually its opposite

  • @prashant.ententerprizes5092
    @prashant.ententerprizes5092 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Which is longest range in binoculars ×

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Celestron 25x100

    • @anshusharma1523
      @anshusharma1523 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Pracitcalscience I came across a binocular from Celestron having a 15-35×70 range. Would the 35× magnification be of any good with 70mm Optical diameter?

    • @Pracitcalscience
      @Pracitcalscience  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      35x is too much for 70mm binoculars. The exit pupil will be too small. It better to avoid in my opinion 🙏

    • @anshusharma1523
      @anshusharma1523 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Pracitcalscience Thanks for the suggestion. One more thing to ask, what if I need to get a magnification more than 20×? I mean, what are the options available in the binoculars segment if i want to go higher in mag?

  • @user-qi8bk5qb7r
    @user-qi8bk5qb7r 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ada no hp nya

  • @ElectromanRM
    @ElectromanRM ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you