Scott the Woz has NO IDEA how to answer Schlatts Question
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2024
- Scott the Woz is completely stumped by Schlatts Question
Original Episode: • The Scott The Woz Excl...
Twitter: / chucklesammy
Website: www.chucklesan...
Spotify: open.spotify.c....
Edited by
Scott: / scottposts
Chuckle Sandwich is a podcast hosted by Ted Nivison, Charlie Slimecicle and jschlatt where they talk about whatever the hell they want, they'll be bringing guests on in the future, but I suppose we really haven't figured out what this is yet. Maybe stick around and find out.
It’s so funny when the guests’ brains just autocorrect the question to what would make actual sense as a would you rather
Bacon causes cancer anyway.. trust me you gotta look it up
What do you mean? It does make sense
Where does it not make sense? I thought they asked it very clearly. Do you need to hear it again?
what is there to correct? whats your problem? wheres your respect for this question?
I’m sorry does it not make sense. Do I need to make it crystal?
Scott saying "I'm kinda pissed off here" in his totally not pissed off voice fucking broke my soul hahaha
Hi
I feel like Scott is the kind of guy where a "I'm not mad, I'm just disappointed" would be enough to make me instantly regret whatever I did.
"schlatt's" insistence on specifically wording the question as "games, unlimited games" never fails to kill me
yes
He picked out exactly what made Sark's reaction so funny in the original question. The fact the he reiterated the fact of it being unlimited with such energy. A perfect example of how a joke evolves and just continually gets better and how it needs people to build on it to really be great.
well thats the question. do you really expect him to just ignore an important part of the question?
True
Agent 00game
“Schlatt” looked so disappointed when he said it wrong
“jschlatt” really did
He really did "look" "disappointed" when he "said" it "wrong"
“He” really “was” “disappointed” when “he” said it “wrong”
@@chojoe1256 "he" "really" "was" "disappointed" "when" "he" "said" "it" "wrong"
"h"e" "r"e"a"l"l"y" "l"o"o"k"e"d" "s"o" "d"i"s"a"p"p"o"i"n"t"e"d" "w"h"e"n" "h"e" " "s"a"i"d" "I"t" "w"r"o"n"g"
Schlatt lowkey beefing with Scott is weirdly in character for both of them. It’s almost as if Schlatt had sex.
Oddly specific conclusion.... Did you have sex with Schlatt? Literally some INSIDE knowledge
Impossible. He DID.
@@Beware_of_Meh how?!?! How do you know?!?!?
@@postbunnie Barrel Blast
@@PEARLSTOTHEPLAYERS makes sense, Tuesdays are my turn in the barrel...
with each episode we get more context on what the latter option actually means.
no we dont
🪜
But it is obvious what it means
Do you mean latter?
I think it's more of a step stoll option
this feels like an ai generated conversation
its like listening to a conversation that gta npcs are having
LMAOOOOOO
"Games... Unlimited Games"
"But no Games"
Hi
@@LordFartamor hi
@@GDNashit bye
that's so many games though
the amount of time it took scott to actually hear the question right was painful
The number of times they insisted on the joke was also painful
scott would rather see the world burn than get unlimited bacon
I don't get why he's avoiding saying he doesn't eat pork
@@jonskillings1258 Huh? he said he likes breakfast sausage
considering he's Jewish....nah
it's not on his menu
I love that Ted ensured to say it correctly by specifically saying "Games...unlimited games"
I figured it out
Schlatt is extremely consistent with how he asks the question, always saying it the same way without fail.
"Would you rather have unlimited bacon but no more video games, or games, unlimited games but no games"
The fact he never says it any differently shows that his wording is crucial to figuring out a suitable answer.
The statement "but no *more* video games" as oppose to "but no games" when matched with the Unlimited Bacon is a crucial part to remember, because the use of "no more" instead of just simply "no" implies that while you cannot acquire any more video games, you would still have all of the games you already owned on top of receiving an unlimited supply of bacon.
However his repeated emphasis of "Games, unlimited games but no games" is rather intriguing, the way I interpret his use of wording here implies that while you have access to an unlimited supply of games, you would lose all of your games in the process, also he never states that games is in reference to strictly video games, he only says "games" for the second option in this hypothetical.
In a position such as Scott's where he is fortunate enough to have an enormous game selection, it would be more beneficial for him to choose Unlimited Bacon but no more video games as that would supply him with an unlimited source of food and even possibly giving him an opportunity to start a business selling bacon, but also his already extensive library of video games would stay the same, sure he wouldn't be able to buy any more video games but I feel like that isn't the worst loss for someone who makes a lot of content about games from the past.
Definitely over analysing this but I wasn't traumatised by English papers and exams for no reason.
he literally fails to be consistent with it in this same video... so the joke is always the same
why
boredom
There is nothing to figure out. This originally is a mail in question for the machinima show respawn. The person who wrote the question completely screwed up. There is only one correct answer and that's unlimited bacon because if you take the 2nd option you get nothing and aren't allowed to play any video games.
Saying "games" can still imply "video games" because the sentence had already introduced "video games" as a subject, similar to using an acronym after introducing and using what the acronym stood for earlier.
Schlatt’s face when scott says he’s a sausage guy 😂
"Schlatt" never fails to crack us all up 😂
12 frames of confused disgust
Schlatt just feels like an AI that made a “would you press the button” question but wasn’t trained on how question proposition works
In this clip Schlatt actually definitively resolves what option 2 entails. At 6:17 his statement proves that you become in possession of any kind of game, only to lose it immediately after the fact.
Nah he will always play the opposite side of whatever they choose, that's the whole game, (unlimited game)
Having Scott in a blue border for the whole podcast was a great move
Scott playing the 4D chess of stupidity with them. Its almost genius
it took me some weeks to realize what the question was actually saying
Which is?
@@TheWhills would you rather have unlimited bacons but no more games
or games, UNLIMITED games, but no games
So you could have unlimited games..... But there are no games.. So you have unlimited nothing. AND no bacon.
That second option is a bit difficult. Ill have to confront my financial advisor
@@TheWhills confront, not consult. There will be violence. You may end up striking your financial advisor in a fit of rage
i love the "games, unlimited games" part
After all the time it took him to even understand the question, he actually answered it really fast and with very little fuss once he heard it.
the way i interpret it is that i would personally have UNLIMITED GAMES. at that point in time, every game i could want that has been produced. but upon taking that choice, i would lose all future games. no more games.
I like this interpretation. It's an interesting, but challenging option to choose.
@@UmarTahir there's already too many games, we can stop now.
@@invertebrado never
My interpretation was you can summon any game to your hands but also any game you come Into contact will disappear
I have some thoughts on this. Have you ever played a game so horrendous and thought to yourself “this is not a game” it’s just garbage. So you can have any game you want but it’s only of the select dogshit games that are so bad that you almost can’t even call them a game
I'VE FIGURED OUT THE ANSWER it's option 2 because when it states "no games" it doesn't specify what kind of games. So say they're actually playing mind games and the question in of itself is a game, well that'd mean picking option 2 "unlimited video games but no games", would essentially end the game. Which means you'd no longer have to give them an answer to their question, and they'll stop asking the question.
They stop asking if you say option 1 too tho
The joke is that its just non-sense. There isn't a good answer, the original question specifies "video games but no video games"
@@purequasarno, at least from what I’ve seen they keep pressing the question if they pick 1
wrong.
@@DeepfriedBeans4492 they stop asking the question when the person picks either option. they usually ask "why?" the person picked their answer after tho.
God Scott just feels like 2012 TH-cam in the best way
Love that the respawn inbox still holds its influence to this day because of this question and Mr. Sark
I love how you put the bigass blue border around mr wozniak in the thumbnail split
I never in a million years would have thought I’d see schlatt talking to scott and it feeling weirdly normal
This question always accomplishes to determine which guests actually watch the podcast and which one just knows ted and schlatt or charlie
1:49 They put laxatives in my Cracker Barrel
"they"
"Cracker Barrel"
"my"
"in"
"laxatives"
Why does he still have the border?
Looks like SOMEONE hasn’t heard of the Ohio Blue Border Tragedy of 2021!
"Why does he still have his eyes?" "Why does he still have clothes?"
taking a lot of shit for someone who DOESNT have a blue border around them
The border is required for all ohians. 😞 They won’t let us breach containment.
It comes free with purchase
This should be an interview question.
Really throw them off.
Jaiden Animations said she wanted to be the Toothpick
We need to get Scott and Jaiden to fight to the death to decide who gets to be the toothpick.
I love how even after they've moved on to the sandwich question schlatt still can't let go that Scott didn't take the bacon
I'd like to image the 2nd one is like having a full steam library with a computer that's too low quality to open steam
I like to think Schlatt not knowing how an ultimatum works on SMP Live eventually led to this question bit
I love that Scott comes accompanied with the blue border. I feel like if you saw him in real life, you would see a blue border around your vision.
I love when TH-camrs do collaborations. It always feels like a crossover episode lmao
When someone picks option 2 I really respect it
this is the longest 6 mins and 41 seconds I've ever experienced.
Once again calling it "Shlatt's" question when he's fully admitted he ripped it from Respawn Inbox
Yeah, but he made it a meme.
He did rip the line from there, but the actual gag is actually original, as it’s not merely the question, but rather schlatt(and ted’s) response to the question’s answer that make it truly funny.
It’s the mindgames the question creates when you make them take it seriously that elevates it. The more confused you can make the guest, the more double-takes you can create, the better.
Scott asking if other foods exist as if he doesn't have to deal with trails and tribulations of making his way out of his home state three times every day just for sustenance
This needs to be a playlist.
september 11th, 2001
Muriatic acid can be found in most hardware stores.
He missed such a good opportunity to immediately say bacon on the sandwich
How did I never know that they did an Episode with Scott the Fucking Woz until a Year After
god these are so fkn good
I love the fact that whenever Scott exist, the boarder exists.
at this point even schaltt has autocorrected it in his mind
Schlatt really thought he did something with the second question
I am so used to being confused with even the most sensible questions, that I would default to "Yes".
This guys are lucky Scott didn't just end the interview
I love how even when Scott’s a guest on one of these sorts of videos he still has the blue border surrounding him
"Schlatt the Scoz" was absolutely Schlozergazzed.
wii u
I interpret the question as:
Choice 1: Unlimited bacon, but you cannot purchase, be gifted, pirate, or otherwise obtain games that you do not already have possession of.
Choice 2: You get games, UNLIMITED games, but a new video game is never released again. So you now possess every game that has ever and will ever exist, as no games will exist in the future..
Or, the second choice: you can get unlimited games, but YOU don't get them. You cannot have them, but you can summon them.
I am going with option 1 because in option 2 no more video games for the rest of the world will be released. Also with the bacon I could have nice breakfasts with friends or open a restaurant.
I felt Schlatt and Ted were pretty crystal when explaining the question
Scott being in a blue border means this is canon to the Scott The Woz universe
Does anyone else know that this originated from machinima respawn? They ask the question so much now but it was from an old machinima respawn episode
300 Chinese Fingertraps
I love how this is a 6 minute video
I have messed up the question exactly like that when my friends and I joke about it, so I’m glad it even happens to Schlatt himself 😂
But like, of all the places why Cracker Barrel 💀💀
good cheese.
Apparently the closest one to me is 2h 45m away, and in the next state over.
i like that he still has his blue border
Is Schlatt wearing a 9/11 shirt?
Jaiden Animations already said toothpick when she came on the podcast
Jaiden is the actual tooth pick, Scott is that plastic thing on the toothpick
I'd like to interpret it as Unlimited (video) games, but no (psychological) games. Therefore, I'm choosing option 2 sir.
I love how Scott has his border
My best friend asked me this question and I was more confused than Scott was in this video
I should be on Chuckle Sandwich.
What I bring to the table:
Anxiety
Nothing
Why I’m better than everyone else:
I’m not
Am I funny?
No
Will I contribute to anything?
No, but I will try once, and then stay quiet for the rest of the show
The collab of the decade.
People reinterpret or confuse themselves into misunderstanding the question rather then just answer it directly by seeing the trick
I feel like they kind of hesitated to gaslight him this time because he was so pissy
I CHOOSE NO MORE GAMES.
SCHLATT, WHAT DID YOU DO IN 1999?
I never expected this collab in a blue borderillion years
games, unlimited games, but no games.
Unstoppable force vs Immovable Object
…
Games, unlimited games vs No Games.
Equally interesting philosophical quandaries.
holy crap it’s Scott Wozniak!!!!!!!!!! 🤯🤯
I like his insistence on answering it as if it were actually a version of the question with a proper answer
I LOVE SCOTT
"Would you rather have unlimited bacon but no more games OR games, unlimited games, but no more games?"
What is this supposed to mean? Does "no more games" in both options mean that no new games are created? If that element is the same with either option, is the essence of the question, "Which would you rather have in a world with no new games: unlimited bacon or unlimited games?"
Is the point to confuse the interviewee? Even the hosts didn't agree on how to phrase it when asking.
It means that on one had, you could have an endless supply of bacon, but you have to have 0 games. On the other hand, you could have an endless supply of games, at the cost of not having any games.
what you can lose, you can get back
to anyone who doesn't understand the latter i'll try to explain it to ya
Basically you get games, unlimited games but no games. I hope that helps you guys
If this question resolved in order you would recover unlimited games but after that no more games.
unlimited money to buy games but no actuall produced games to buy
Lol “Schlatt” is so funny 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
YOU have absolutely gotten the Toothpick Before!
Games, UNLIMITED games
, but no games
I heard the first 7 seconds and was SENT because I knew what the joke was.
As someone who doesn't watch regularly, I caught on to the joke once he said it twice, but at the same time wow I bet this makes for some really awkward moments
the "nope" really got me at the beginning
"Scott" the "Woz" is really bad at hearing "Schlatt's" question.
i have no context watching this
bacon doesnt exist in the Scott the Woz multiverse canon.
So this was foreshadowing the bank taking away his stuff
The thing is is schlatt says “games, unlimited games, but no more games” which means you get to keep the games but you can’t get *more*
CLEARLY the woz was trying to teach the point that when an unlimited resource is created and destroyed in such a manner, the very fabric of space time would start to bend, only neil degrasse tyson would be able to explain what comes next, but needless to say, it would be bad. Unfortunately, the woz left this podcast furious, and embarked on a journey to find the games, unlimited games, but no games. We’re in gods hands now, for when he finds it, we are all doomed.
You hear that ladies he’s more of a “sausage guy”
Love schlatts shirt
we went from Schlatt's clip of him hitting the madden 04 GBA cartridge with a hammer on an episode of scott to scott being interviewed by Schlatt. truly a full circle moment.
The correct answer is B because if you think about it "Unlimited games" cancels out "no games" leaving us with just "games" which is our current natural state 😎
Scott is very dang charismatic
Scott the woz and schlatt?? What kind of alternate reality did I step in