Step 1: Ask the question. If they're confused, repeat the question Step 2: Don't elaborate Step 3: Question them on their answer Step 4: Watch them melt
Y’know it is a bit paradoxical, but i feel like the whole «unlimited games» is subject to the the «but no games» clause, because the «but» specifies the previous condition and takes precident over it. So in the end the «no games» win, and you’re really left with (unlimited bacon and no games) versus (no games), which is a really easy choice for anyone who’s seen the bacon prices these days.
Personally i think games but no games Is the best option because while you have games you also have no games yet you also have bacon the result of choosing games but no games leads you to a peaceful, happy and healthy life there is no way you can go wrong
I'm so glad my friends don't know Schlatt is, because if they did, they could tell I am a giant nerd who just repeats things that a grown man said online.
honestly i'm always surprised how much trouble people have with this. it's so easily the second choice. in option 2 your bacon quantity remains the same as it is now, and you get to find out what "unlimited games but no games" means. it's the best scenario all-around.
I know this is just silly bit, but the part where Ted says ”no, no” at 0:57 sounds so natural that it makes the guy they’re asking like the odd one out
Sark is the godfather of modern comedy. Some random guy who wrote to Machinima Respawn has no idea that he's created one of the oldest and greatest jokes of all time, and I find that hilarious.
This is an old trick that only really works on idiots who think they’re smart. They try to figure out what they’re getting in option 2 and can’t understand it’s just a trick question. And then you hit them with the “you’re getting aggressive” you piss them off even more. And of course you need everyone else to pretend it makes perfect sense. Any smart person would say unlimited bacon.
I did this with my homie and he got philosophical it was crazy. He was talking about selfless vs selfishness like the unlimited games but no games part was supposed to mean that everyone would be able to have unlimited games, but only at the sacrifice of his games.
I just now realized that I think the question actually makes sense. When they say unlimited games but no games, they mean there is no limit to the amount of games you CAN have, but you just don't have any of them. Unlimited doesn't always mean infinite.
this is actually a question I ask potential suitors because I have found people answer one of THREE ways (i know there's only two options, hear me out) option 1: they pick unlimited bacon but no games- they are generally sensible people because they seem to think this is giving them something rather than nothing and they are depending on their logic to tell them that this is the best option Option 2: they say the questions is dumb and refuse to answer because the question doesn't make sense- they are no fun and don't like stupid jokes or weird thought experiments, they are not worth your time to date Option 3: the best choice, they chose games, unlimited games but no games- they are up for the chaos of perceiving this question and twisting it however the wish by finding loopholes or they just love that it's a ridiculous answer any man (or woman) who picks option 1 or 3 are good potential till suitors, anyone who picks option 2 I immediately dump or cease contact with because they are not worth my time
so people cant be serious about things in this world? i mean if silly is your type sure but 'cease contact' with anyone that picks 2? the idea of your test is basically that either they are marriage potential or you never speak to them again with no in between, which unless youre meeting them from like a dating site or something, is just an absolutely insane way to live. like the idea that not accepting people who arent needlessly chaotic as a partner is already unreasonable in how it unnecessarily limits yourself to the types of people that you can get together with, but ceasing contact with anyone who says 2 is just illogical, why cant they be friends? acquaintances? heck even just regular people that you dont need to have an opinion on? you walk down the street and theres a stranger youve never met who would choose 2, does that mean you would block them irl if you knew they were a 2 person? youre giving people an option of double or nothing, in a world where 'nothing' should not be a way to treat someone unless theyve done something truly horrible to you, blocking someone for not being your type is crazy
Using the word suitors and immediately dumping someone based on one question is something a person who takes everything too seriously would do. Just relax
I love how Joe immediately called them out on the fact the question made no sense. Usually everybody else is just completely dumfounded and doesn't realize that the second option has unlimited games, but no games.
The obvious choice, in my opinion, is unlimited bacon but no games. Similarly to Joe's (clearly flawed) idea, I would sell the item that I have an unlimited amount of. However, in this case, it'd be the bacon. As opposed to the games as Joe suggested (which I feel made no sense, considering that he would have no games to sell??????) Although it would be hard to go without games, I could essentially create an infinite money glitch which would be pretty cool.
why? there wouldn’t be any games. did you hear the question question? would you rather have unlimited bacon but no games, or games, *unlimited* games, but no games?
Personally, Evan, I didn't enjoy the disrespect of your second latest video regarding people mishearing your name. The over exaggeration of ridiculous costumes, fake accents, and overall disrespectful demeaner seemed inexcusable and intolerable to say the least. Think before you preach, "Even"
@@64speed50 *GASP* Personally, I didn’t enjoy the disrespect of your reference to my disrespect to the reference of Joe’s disrespect. It’s very disrespectful. Your overall impolite manner of pointing out details in my videos is condescending and unjustified and that’s saying very little. Do think before you speak, “69Fast”
I love how everytime someone says they're chose the first one cause the second has no games they said "but the second one has unlimited games" And everytime someone says the second one cause it has unlimited games they say "but the second one has no games
See, to you this is all fun and games. To me, this is everyday life when people try communicating with you. I have autism and every single person around me makes just as much sense as this question, all the time.
Unlimited games but no games is like a math equation. Unlimited games + no games. Unlimited and no cancel out so you get games + games, and since those are the same things you get games.
In the first one they specify video games whereas in the second they just say games. Clearly unlimited games but no games is better because you can keep both bacon and video games
he stated the question saying "unlimited games but no MORE games", the addition of the word more states that you have all the games, but after that you are unable to be in possession of any more games
he's right though! YOU can't have games yourself, but there's nothing in the rules that you can't sell the unlimited amount of games, like a dropshipping company.
it’s always the “games, unlimited games” that gets me
"but, no games" is what loses me
@@YK-dx4ux always mumbled under his breath afterwards
I thought it was crystal clear to me@@charliemcmillan4561
THIS DEAL GIVES YOU UNLIMITED GAMES
(games may not be included)@@charliemcmillan4561
and then ted saying "crystal"
The fact that they find a way to repeat it every single time is becoming my favorite part of the question.
But that’s the part we haven’t examined yet, however unlimited games with games and no games is truly a remarkable breakthrough in bullshittery
@@samael4550 it's schlatt's delivery that makes it so funny for me
@@xpercade8926 i agree most of the time, but sometimes it’s even the guest or Ted (or Charlie in the past but RIP)
@@samael4550 oh yeah that's true too
“games, unlimited games”
I’m sure Charlie was laughing his ass off from heaven
What is he dead?
@@aaronsimon1465 yes
@@aaronsimon1465 no
@@aaronsimon1465 his house mysteriously exploded unrelated to the fact that he left the podcast
@@m3gawither7734 oh damn, I think I saw that on the news about a time bomb or something
Step 1: Ask the question. If they're confused, repeat the question
Step 2: Don't elaborate
Step 3: Question them on their answer
Step 4: Watch them melt
Elaboration limited to:
but you have unlimited games.
But also no games
unless successful, step 5: repeat
@@Cbawls i figured he was saying gains
yup, works everytime also in day to day practices in real life circumstances
I like how they make the person they ask the question to the stupid one haha
It's just not the same without Charlie dying of laughter
I'd love charlie to react to a compilation of The Question following his departure. I'm sure he's seeing em but I wanna *see* him see em
Fly high Charlie 😇🕊 RIP
And for the hypeman
TRUE
Fr Charlie would’ve loved this particular episode
"Joe you're getting aggressive"
guy in the blue shirt
@@bedro_0bartender can i get an angel unlimited bacon but no games
"in what scenario you get no bacon?" broke him.
Him trying to actually understand the question fucking kills me. Gotta be my favorite bit on the podcast
@@johnbishop9621 yes lol
He’s a philosopher lol
Y’know it is a bit paradoxical, but i feel like the whole «unlimited games» is subject to the the «but no games» clause, because the «but» specifies the previous condition and takes precident over it. So in the end the «no games» win, and you’re really left with (unlimited bacon and no games) versus (no games), which is a really easy choice for anyone who’s seen the bacon prices these days.
@@ouishi9447Or just the fact that you'd at least gain bacon instead of still losing games and gaining nothing.
@@babygirl5748 yeah true
Personally i think games but no games Is the best option because while you have games you also have no games yet you also have bacon the result of choosing games but no games leads you to a peaceful, happy and healthy life there is no way you can go wrong
But bacon
@@thx6463 stfu and take unlimited games
But games
But you have no games
@@sewerwaluigi did you even listen to the question? you're getting unlimited games, its literally the first part of the question
Gets better every time
It really doesn’t
@@ezrapaul6808 do you not get the question?
@@ezrapaul6808 So, Ezra Paul, would you rather, have unlimited bacon, but no video games; or games, unlimited games, but no games?
@@ezrapaul6808 ^^^^^
@@_casanova Ezra Paul: “I would have games, unlimited games but no games.”
Them gas lighting him the whole time “aren’t we being crystal clear?“ has me dying LMAO
Please, god, never let this meme die. And please keep it from being overused. I am deeply invested in the freshness of this meme.
It’s from a machinima inbox with Sark and APL fisher. It’s been around for a long time
This is the absolute opposite of a fresh meme. This meme is as fresh as “have you seen Chef?”
this guy went with the unlimited games
It still seems to be considered funny 9 months later 😅
1 year later, still hilarious
I'm so glad my friends don't know Schlatt is, because if they did, they could tell I am a giant nerd who just repeats things that a grown man said online.
This is great
he repeats a lot of jokes like the rest of us so its probably fine
He repeats a lot of shit from old Machinma videos and older TH-camrs. You would being pulling a Schaltt on Schlatt himself
he literally taught us the cycle cause he does the same exact thing
We know. All of us know.
honestly i'm always surprised how much trouble people have with this. it's so easily the second choice. in option 2 your bacon quantity remains the same as it is now, and you get to find out what "unlimited games but no games" means. it's the best scenario all-around.
I mean I would presume that it means you have unlimited games, but no games
Is that so hard to understand ?
Infinite X 0 is zero so either one is no games
@@Blaketarded but there is unlimited games
@@captainunrelatedpopcornfir4177 I don't think this guy understood the question
except that your bacon is limited. i KNOW i can exploit & enjoy unlimited bacon in op.1
it's the safest scenario, easily.
The talking over each other really helps out with the confusion
what confusion man it's a really simple question cmon now
This bit still makes me die every time
Can you tell me what it’s from/ how it was started?
@@RieKrispies the question is from a machinima respawn inbox episode from like a decade ago
It is beyond our lowly human intellect to understand
@@RieKrispies sark is the goat
I can still hear Charlie's ghost losing his collective shit when this question is asked
I don't know why the "games... unlimited games" makes me laugh so much
I love it. Cuz they reword the question in so many ways but “games, unlimited games” is always the same
it's actually really simple.
I like how Ted was at one point annoyed by the question but now hes just full in and just you know plays along with the joke.
I know this is just silly bit, but the part where Ted says ”no, no” at 0:57 sounds so natural that it makes the guy they’re asking like the odd one out
The gaslighting here is insane, love it keep up the good work
Sark is the godfather of modern comedy. Some random guy who wrote to Machinima Respawn has no idea that he's created one of the oldest and greatest jokes of all time, and I find that hilarious.
Glad to see some Sark acknowledgement, heard his rage instantly after seeing this in my feed 😅
Even still using his exact tonalagy and cadence. Games, Unlimited games.
we really gotta find who wrote the question in the first place though
@@jaken6462 Matt Andy Wild Noč apperantly
@@jaken6462 he's probably buried next to Jimmy Hoffa.
Guys i think i cracked he code! When you have no games, technically there is an unlimited number of games you can obtain.
I think he misunderstood the question, you guys should've repeated it one more time.
I thought it was pretty crystal
I've never seen someone get so stressed over such a simple question
2:20 this silent reaction trying to comprehend the question is so good.
This type of "the only way to win is to not play" stuff always gets to me
Bro im so happy they got Joe on this is hillarious
2:57 " Joe you're getting aggressive" LMFAO
The funniest part of this is the consistency of the wording in the second option. "Games: unlimited games. But no games."
3:05 Look at Shlatt's lips after he says "agressive". He wants to laugh so bad.
It only took 3 minutes for Joe to go insane on camera lmao
Probably the best reaction to the question yet.
I like how he's the first guest to continue his line of questioning instead if just giving up after the second try.
I absolutely love it when the guest tries to correct Schlatt and he just fully ignores them
2:08 he's matching up to schlatts pacing so well now, my god
I feel like he should've just answered the question without making such a fuss about it.
fr like i don’t understand what he was so lost about
This is an old trick that only really works on idiots who think they’re smart.
They try to figure out what they’re getting in option 2 and can’t understand it’s just a trick question.
And then you hit them with the “you’re getting aggressive” you piss them off even more.
And of course you need everyone else to pretend it makes perfect sense.
Any smart person would say unlimited bacon.
That's apart of his character lol
that's what im sayyyinnn it's such a straight forward non confusing question .. like just answer
It's the fun of conversation. This video would be 10 seconds long if he just answered immediately
When Shlatt says, "But there'd be none of them" i always die of laughter
my friend managed to solve a paradox when i asked him this question.
the "crystal" part has the same energy as "calc is short for calculator chat".
I did this with my homie and he got philosophical it was crazy. He was talking about selfless vs selfishness like the unlimited games but no games part was supposed to mean that everyone would be able to have unlimited games, but only at the sacrifice of his games.
I'm just glad they were CRYSTAL
when schlatt and ted said "but no games" at the exact same time, I died peacefully
This bit genuinely never gets old
What’s funny is he made schlatt slip cause he said he would sell the games and he was like “but there are no games”
the guy taking the question so seriously made this 1000x funnier
Gotta love the question
I just now realized that I think the question actually makes sense. When they say unlimited games but no games, they mean there is no limit to the amount of games you CAN have, but you just don't have any of them. Unlimited doesn't always mean infinite.
this is like watching a robot melt down because you asked it something it cant comprehend
That man was using 1000% of his brain power to figure this one out.
I love how every time someone answers unlimited games they always course them into the correct answer
The boys lunch table
3:05 has to be the pinnacle of this joke. Just the sheer control of schlatt throughout the bit
i love how they make you feel guilty after you asnwer the question
this is actually a question I ask potential suitors because I have found people answer one of THREE ways (i know there's only two options, hear me out)
option 1: they pick unlimited bacon but no games- they are generally sensible people because they seem to think this is giving them something rather than nothing and they are depending on their logic to tell them that this is the best option
Option 2: they say the questions is dumb and refuse to answer because the question doesn't make sense- they are no fun and don't like stupid jokes or weird thought experiments, they are not worth your time to date
Option 3: the best choice, they chose games, unlimited games but no games- they are up for the chaos of perceiving this question and twisting it however the wish by finding loopholes or they just love that it's a ridiculous answer
any man (or woman) who picks option 1 or 3 are good potential till suitors, anyone who picks option 2 I immediately dump or cease contact with because they are not worth my time
so people cant be serious about things in this world? i mean if silly is your type sure but 'cease contact' with anyone that picks 2? the idea of your test is basically that either they are marriage potential or you never speak to them again with no in between, which unless youre meeting them from like a dating site or something, is just an absolutely insane way to live. like the idea that not accepting people who arent needlessly chaotic as a partner is already unreasonable in how it unnecessarily limits yourself to the types of people that you can get together with, but ceasing contact with anyone who says 2 is just illogical, why cant they be friends? acquaintances? heck even just regular people that you dont need to have an opinion on? you walk down the street and theres a stranger youve never met who would choose 2, does that mean you would block them irl if you knew they were a 2 person? youre giving people an option of double or nothing, in a world where 'nothing' should not be a way to treat someone unless theyve done something truly horrible to you, blocking someone for not being your type is crazy
@@upisntdownsilly type 2 mfs would rather write a wall of ramblings insead of answering one simple question.
Weird asf. You sound like you are a bit of a crazy
@@upisntdownsillysounds like someone would choose 2
Using the word suitors and immediately dumping someone based on one question is something a person who takes everything too seriously would do. Just relax
It’s crazy how often people go with option two.
It feels empty without the "chuckle" from chuckle sandwich's "question"
The question is “Would rather have unlimited bacon or not”
3:22 really surprised me
"We're close to crystal"
What kind of crystal are we talking about here?
Stresses me out just thinking about it
the only way to win is to start questioning them back. “but i have unlimited games”
Just having flash backs of Mr. Sark screaming "Just take the Bacon"
it’s simple, just do l’hospital’s rule on the second part of the question for how many games you have
dawg the only crystal im seeing here is meth
lmao😭
My Machinima Inbox’s legacy live on forever
I love how Joe immediately called them out on the fact the question made no sense. Usually everybody else is just completely dumfounded and doesn't realize that the second option has unlimited games, but no games.
The amount of rage that wells in my body from this meme is indescribable.
Subscribed
The fact that he’s been asking this decade old question is amazing
He was baffled fr💀
I literally go into a fit of giggles every time I watch them ask this question
I love how Ted always jumps on the person for being confused about the question
Times like these is when we're missing Charlie 😕
what happened
@@RSGVM he left but will be back soon
@@kingzeno1708 love him to death!
@@kingzeno1708 hes coming back?
@@TheeDeadCreator i dont think so
Gotta love that mail room never died. Mr.Sark is such a fucking legend.
The obvious choice, in my opinion, is unlimited bacon but no games. Similarly to Joe's (clearly flawed) idea, I would sell the item that I have an unlimited amount of. However, in this case, it'd be the bacon. As opposed to the games as Joe suggested (which I feel made no sense, considering that he would have no games to sell??????) Although it would be hard to go without games, I could essentially create an infinite money glitch which would be pretty cool.
How would he not have any games to sell? He picked the option with the unlimited games …
@@mayhem8834 yeah but hed have no games
wouldn't you drown in bacon????
@@Max-gn4rw yeah but hed have unlimited games
@@astraspec yeah but hed have no games
its even funnier now since joe is now deathly allergic to meat
If you think about it both choices have the same downside so the choice is essentially unlimited bacon or unlimited games so unlimited games ez
why? there wouldn’t be any games. did you hear the question question? would you rather have unlimited bacon but no games, or games, *unlimited* games, but no games?
wow i didnt even realize that. smart thinking
@@ripit.3457You can't say there wouldn't be any games because you literally get unlimited games
@@jebus42069nobody gets any games
There needs so be a playlist of just “the question”
Personally, I didn’t enjoy his disrespect. He should’ve just answer the question, what was so hard about it? TikTokers these days, smh
Personally, Evan, I didn't enjoy the disrespect of your second latest video regarding people mishearing your name. The over exaggeration of ridiculous costumes, fake accents, and overall disrespectful demeaner seemed inexcusable and intolerable to say the least.
Think before you preach, "Even"
@@64speed50 *GASP* Personally, I didn’t enjoy the disrespect of your reference to my disrespect to the reference of Joe’s disrespect. It’s very disrespectful. Your overall impolite manner of pointing out details in my videos is condescending and unjustified and that’s saying very little.
Do think before you speak, “69Fast”
Oooooooooh someone doesn’t understand satire
@@chaseh2036 r/woosh
@@evantheaxolotl8862 damn I really played myself didn’t I. I apologize for my condescending comment
"You have awakened me from an endless slumber.."
literally gas lighting
This should be the definition of gas lighting someone
This is a great example of the manipulative tactic known as a double bind
I love how everytime someone says they're chose the first one cause the second has no games they said "but the second one has unlimited games"
And everytime someone says the second one cause it has unlimited games they say "but the second one has no games
See, to you this is all fun and games. To me, this is everyday life when people try communicating with you. I have autism and every single person around me makes just as much sense as this question, all the time.
"Games, Unlimited Games but No Games". It's so simple. Games cancels out games leaving you with just Unlimited games.
Schlatt acting nervous when he talks to a hot guy
I hope someone makes a whole ass compilation of everytime this question is asked to a guest and their reaction
The only thing crystal is what everyone in this room is smoking
Unlimited games but no games is like a math equation.
Unlimited games + no games. Unlimited and no cancel out so you get games + games, and since those are the same things you get games.
LMFAOOOOO
The answer is obviously unlimited bacon because their isn’t any games in any of them anyway
THE MEMORIES! The first time I heard this question was during a Machinima Respawn Inbox with Mr. Sark and APL Fisher.
there are two types of people in this world, ones who are confused with the question and ones who roll with it
In the first one they specify video games whereas in the second they just say games. Clearly unlimited games but no games is better because you can keep both bacon and video games
The funniest part is that it SOUNDS like you’re being gaslit but it’s genuinely just a deceptively stupid would you rather question.
300 Chinese Fingertraps
This is the first time that someone has confused the person that asked the question
Joe's brain is short-circuiting
he stated the question saying "unlimited games but no MORE games", the addition of the word more states that you have all the games, but after that you are unable to be in possession of any more games
he's right though!
YOU can't have games yourself, but there's nothing in the rules that you can't sell the unlimited amount of games, like a dropshipping company.