You may notice the new "Join" button because of TH-cam's new memberships feature! I'll make a video explaining it more in detail later this week, but feel free to check it out early and see the perks and feel free to make suggestions. You can also go here: th-cam.com/users/ThioJoejoin
But you can prevent that by putting a wire whisk on your router antennas. Oh how I miss those joke videos. I still get a laugh out of watching those today.
This is y i love this channel. Hope it goes back to that I don't know why there are so many idiots that actually believed in it and had to f up everything lol
This video could have had the perfect sponsorship segway - "The only Wifi that can ever hurt you is an insecure one, always use a VPN to keep your connection secured and encrypted"
So you say it’s not harmful but apple believes you need to keep you phone away from your body as much as possible. If you have an iPhone or ipad check under general>about>legal>rf exposure “To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, the supplied headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.”
There's an old, news story about a Washington state town objecting to a cell phone tower having been installed. Some townspeople said they were feeling sick from it. Then the cell phone company pointed out that it hadn't been turned on yet.
Microwave ovens are specifically tuned to the frequency of DiHydrogen Monoxide. This chemical is a powerful industrial solvent. Think about that for a moment...
Those use specific lamps that generate an amount of UVA/UVB radiation; In Europe they are limited to 0,3 W/m2. Also note that tanning, in any form (sun or tanning bed) increases the risk of getting skin cancer.
Thank you so much for this explanation, my parents have been afraid of wifi and cell signals for years and I kept telling them they aren't harmful, maybe this will change their mind.👍
Well, call me a cynic if you like but I don't trust any wireless technology - why so? Within 9 months of me deciding to go from the old cable connection and purchasing a wi-fi box for my TV and PC, (for increased speed and what have you) a lump appeared on my neck and when I went to get it checked out by my GP I was referred to a specialist and diagnosed with throat cancer. Previously I was a non-smoker, non-drinker, regularly exercised, cycled, walked, etc and ate healthily. Unfortunately, due to the small size of our house, I was sitting with the wif fi box right near me. I have since undergone chemo and radiotherapy and after going through hell have finally been given the all-clear.... but I'm not the man I once was... all those treatments take something out of you. So, no, I wouldn't recommend any of this... it's just not worth the ultimate price any of us may end up paying.
Another example: FM / AM radio stations , people have to work there and thay don't feel anything. Trust me I have been less than 100 feet away from one and didn't feel anything.
Doctors and scientists say microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members. Look up the "Moscow Signal" . Russians beamed microwave "wifi" at A US embassy in Moscow. A ton of Employees working there ended up with all types of cancers. There is more than enough peer reviewd research out there to prove WIFI is not safe for prolonged periods of time. Like we all are exposed to on a continual basis. Causes brain fog, fatigue, mood swings, learning disabilities, loss of motivation, neurological effects, and cancers. Has been studied since the Nazis. C'mon people do just 5 minutes of genuine research on this topic. It affects us all! Type in "wifi health effects ncbi" in google. Studies from the government themselves admit that : "Repeated Wi-Fi studies show that Wi-Fi causes oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload. Each of these effects are also caused by exposures to other microwave frequency EMFs, with each such effect being documented in from 10 to 16 reviews. "
If for no other reason this video was useful for me because I didn't realize that my microwave oven was using 2.4 gigahertz which is why it messed with my Wi-Fi and my cordless phone big time.
*I think* if it messes with your wifi it's not shielded right. Microwave ovens are supposed to keep 100% of the "powerful" (more like "scary sounding") 1000W 2.4GHz radiation contained INSIDE the device. (I'm not a radiation scientist though. Maybe it's 99.9% shielded and so 0.01% is enough to somewhat mess up your wifi?) I did google it and found a positive result: "In theory, a properly shielded microwave shouldn't leak any radiation, but the reality is that they leak quite a bit, resulting in electromagnetic, or radio-frequency (RF), interference. "
3ICE --Now a good question would be where the hell do you find a "good" nuker that is properly shielded? Don't believe even Consumer Reports tests the amount of shielding in the units, who would? Nobody.
yeah they are contained. The guys that build this stuff understand these things better than anyone watching this video. If close enough though a lot of things can interfere with other things
I do not want to live in your house, cordless phones are some of the worst things you can have in your home that is radiating the sh*t out of you 24/7 , get an EMF meter, know what you are dealing with and what is a safe distance
iHazer people are quick to jump to believe bullshit videos like this just to justify their addictions to modern technology I bet 90% who watched this weren’t willing to do even an hour of there own research. We are living in sad times
@@alex1239not That's correct recent studies are reporting it. This dork doesn't truly know thee answer, the scientific information is not definitive yet. The safety isn't known because there's still much we don't know about particle physics and the interactions between them
The larger the wavelength the more biologically stable it is. The smaller the wavelength the more harmful it is. The shorter waves rip apart DNA materials and causes cell damage/mutation. The type of frequency of nukes, radon gas, etc. WiFi uses Radio Frequency waves, EMF. The level of EMF is very high and can harm biological growth. I recommend you look up the plant WiFi experiment. In the plants, you can clearly see deterioration in itself based on how close or far away it is from the EMF omission. (Cell towers, cell phones, WiFi routers)
great video there is a lot of great information here. However there are a few things i want to mention. First, the GHz to THz analogy is flawed. yes, a light bulb emits more radiation per unit of time than a WiFi router but the hazard of WiFi comes not from the 'brute force' (wattage) but from the penetrating power of the signal. as you mentioned water resonates at 2.4 GHz and since we are 70% water that can be a problem in the real world. The thought experiment that was setup was one single antenna router in a house with no neighbors. However, we live in the real world and most people live in apartments/condos with many neighbors that have multi antenna routers. (look up MIMO) a trick many WiFi device manufactures use to skirt the FCC wattage regulations is they only measure the output power at a un specified distance from the antennathe antenna. Eg, router is rated to broadcast at 100mw of power @ 10ft but, in reality broadcasts 400mw @ 10Ft because of having 4 antennas. The 802.11 A/B/G networks usually are rated at 100-200mw, 802.11 N usually broadcasts at 150 to 250 mw and 802.11AC broadcasts at up to 1000 mw (1 watt). Since manufactures are motivated by money and happy customers = higher profits they will sometimes rate a routers power at 5,10,15, or even 20ft and and call the level of transmitted radiation they measure the maximum rated power of the router. this is called the effective radiated power (wattage) aka ERP, this is not a true measure of power. the true measure of power is the transmitter output power (TOP) which is measured at the location where the antenna connects to the transmitter. going in to the gory details of antenna theory requires a understanding of college physics and calc 2+3. and one more thing, when you mentioned about low level radiation being less harmful than higher doses is the time constant. how large is the dose * the period of exposure. the reason we think small doses are not harmful is because our bodies are able to repair the damage being done before there is a issue. in parting keep this in mind, exposure at 100mw per hr for 100hr (1 week) is the same as being exposed to 10 watts for 1hr. i say this because 99% of WiFi users leave the WiFi on 24/7/365 untill the router dies. I am CompTIA A+, Net+, and security+ certified. as well as being a general class certified HAM radio operator.
of course wifi is dangerous, pretty much any wireless connection is susceptible to hijacking, blocking, etc. strangers can grab your personal info from thin air if you connect to the wrong open network, for example.
Ionizing radiation is not the only thing that can trigger cancer. when MITOCHONDRIA are stressed, dehydrated or unable to effectively transport electrons you get disease such as cancer or neuro-degenerative problems or autoimmune diseases.
This video is great. I heard of stories of wifi and cellular technology being dangrous. This video really explained how it is not harmful at all. Thanks for the video.
phonepower mobile technically it is. You'll need to spend about 90% of your life being constantly bombarded by 5ghz WiFi communication to notice *anything,* and by then you'll be deteriorating anyways.
Yes but it was a load of rubbish. A light globe is safe so wifi must be safe because they are all radiation, hmmmm. Thats like saying all salt is bad or all fat is bad . Just not true .Also he only compared the heating effects and did not mention the electromagnetic effects on humans of wifi
Thank you for explaining it to someone who has no idea and context as there is heaps of negative vids about Wifi and 5G with meters measuring the output which goes of the dial to materials to block it.
Rusty Blader Eh, not true. Like smoking, it could be killing us very slowly. I'm not saying it is, I'm saying what if. Back then, they thought smoking was safe too.
At this time only weakened people will be in danger , baby's and old ! study it back to the 1960's in gov documentation and you will see what they are doing today!
Finally! Someone who made a proper video about the subject. Im one of those people trying to explain the lock and key principle of ionizing radiation - for which the minimum is UV light. AND NOW WE HAVE A GOOD AND ACCURATE VIDEO FOR IT! You are gold, man! :D
Can WIFI affect pacemakers? Devices that Can Interfere with Pacemakers Wireless internet, mobile phones and modern security systems bring about new areas of risk. ... They produce a frequency that may interact with your pacemaker, but short exposure shouldn't trigger any adverse effects.
It should be noted that in Verizons own official pamphlet it labels all forms of RF, whether wifi or cellular as pollutants. Question, what is a pollutant?
andrew fitzgerald lol i actually know a buddie who lives near a wifi tower, says it's fine. Birds love the tower to since they can sit on it :D so pretty lit. Especially with fast speed
I live in a small apartment and my infant son has his playpen near our WiFi router about two feet away, is that safe? Watching your video I’m pretty sure it is but I need some reassurance so I know I’m not putting him in harms way.
I literally just gave this explanation on a thread on Facebook. I can see how confusing it can be for someone who didn't really grasp physics properly at school but education doesn't work equally well for everyone..
I'm from Nigeria,lived in Nigeria literally upto this very moment lol,but I'm like a Tech god when i speak and do things because of Thiojoe, thanks man. People just don't understand things the way they're supposed to, I've had a few questions in mind tho but I'm sure you'll explain it someday.
Neil Tyson's "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" learned me that the Cosmic Microwave Background wasn't present until a few years, give or take 400,000 years, after the big bang. Good book for my level of I.Q. (Neil's awesome). So it's been around forever minus 400,000 years. Let's not forget about background ionizing radiation here on Earth or even worse Radon in an enclosed home or building. I'm way more concerned about those sources than my in-home wifi. Great Video.
Its also important to note that "radiation" is a generic scientific term for any type of energy that radiates. Every form of energy can be said to radiate and this term should not be confused with nuclear radiation which is a very specific kind of energy and can be deadly. Radio waves and light waves are often referred to as radiation and there is nothing in common between that and nuclear radiation. But people who want to make sensationalistic claims will often ignore the difference. The misinformed will often accidentally or purposefully confuse the two just to have something scary to claim. The only similarity between nuclear radiation and the other forms of energy called radiation is that just like the cosmic background radiation, there is also a tiny background amount of nuclear radiation that we are all exposed to every day. It doesn't matter how close you live to a nuclear plant, its everywhere. If you have granite countertops, you likely have a higher dose of trace radiation than someone who does not since granite counterrtops are a known source of trace (low does) nuclear radiation.
Bluetooth is even less power than a router. It's barely enough power to get from one side of the room to the other side. It's not enough radio-frequency (RF) power to warm up anything at all.
You sir are promoting the view of the industry, which fails to take into account non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Many researchers have been finding a myriad of negative effects on the human biology/physiology from low emitting frequencies well below industry safety standards. What many fail to understand is that our cells do not communicate for the most part via chemical reactions, fast communication is done through the use of specific frequencies. This is why in the literature you find certain frequencies have health benefits (e.g. can accelerate tissue repair). The question that scientists (not in the US because we are bought out by big industry) have started to answer is if the frequencies from wireless communication devices (cell phone towers, wifi routers, cell phones, etc.) cause harm to humans. The answer from NON-INDUSTRY sponsored studies is a resounding yes, they do cause many detrimental biological effects. You also left out that most wireless communication devices communicate via pulsed EMFs, which have been shown to carry more health risks compared to non-pulsed EMFs. For better information from actual SCIENTISTS I would recommend looking up Martin Pall, PhD, Martin Blank, PhD, Olle Johansson PhD. If you actually want to see what the research has to say go directly to the sources of information. Stop listening to this third party resource who clearly needs to integrate his knowledge of physics with how the human body functions.
Can you link to any of these negative effects? Also, cells can't produce low frequencies, they literally do communicate via chemicals. The only way certain frequencies will benefit you is to maybe ease you to sleep. Also, can you please link to ANY of these studies rather than just saying "many scientists say this"? Also I think Martin Pall has been charged for quite a few things.
@@sethadkins546 I gave you the name of the scientists. If you wish to look at the harmful effects found you can simply go to Google Scholar or Pubmed and find the studies. I am not going to do your homework for you or engage in long arguments. This is not a place to write a dissertation. A good book with through citations is by Robert Becker PhD called "The Body Electric". His student, Andrew Morino PhD also has books and articles finding harmful effects. Thinking and knowing are two different things in regards to Dr. Pall. If you are going to disregard him please have solid evidence to share. His theories have been under scrutiny, but not his character. Please refer to the other scientists I listed if he is unsatisfactory. In any area of research, theories and ideas will fail. Yet, if you care to do your own investigation you will find harmful effects well below industry standards for many things, not just cell phones. I wrote my comment to pass along information, not to write an article thoroughly fleshing out all arguments/points of view. If you want that you will have to do it yourself. Best of luck. JMJ
Yes it's similar to the placebo effect but in a negative way if you made a person think he has a allergy from let's say honey they will start to feel sick after eating something that they know has honey but they must know it has honey if they don't it would not take effect
Light is destructive. I mean...all one has to do is take a look at the piles of white dust that are the result of my mother's wrath... Joe, I will never understand why people always say to fear the dark... It is pure light that is the truest assassin...
Hi ThioJoe. I liked your logic, but I think it is incomplete. I have a university degree in Computing & Electrical Engineering. I mention this purely so you might reflect, prior to dismissing my comments as uneducated, crackpot. While I think you covered the common uneducated fear associated with this technology, analyzing the Man - Machine interface is often more complex than looking at one or two dimensions. Personally I get headaches when using Cordless Phones that transmit at 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. I'm OK if the phone is only 900MHz. Same with mobile (cell) phones. The effect is worst when inside cars & lifts (I assume this is due to a partial Faraday cage). The headache starts 2 to 5 mins after I start using them & stops ~5 - 10 mins later. Wifi Routers do not affect me, likely they are lower wattage & further away from me. I realise that your talk is focused on WiFi, however your logic is applicable to phone transmission as well. So you might be interested. The two dimensions you might like to consider are distance & harmonics. No doubt you are aware that the signal strength is inversely proportional to distance squared. The Phones only impact me if they are broadcasting less than 3 feet from my head. As energy increases with frequency, your logic that higher frequency can "do more damage" is well proven. However frequency is only one dimension that needs to be examined when considering impact on biology. Harmonics are another. You only need to look at antenna design to see that the energy absorbed (standing waves) are much greater when the size of an item is optimized for the frequency of the transmission. Similarly certain molecules (ie: water) will respond to specific frequencies, while remaining comparatively unaffected by frequencies above & below it. Research shows that phone use can raise the temperature of your brain slightly. Perhaps some people are sensitive to this. Maybe this changes the blood circulation in the scalp. or perhaps influences the nerves to cause scalp muscles to contract. Who knows. I have no idea why millions of people use mobile phones without issue, yet a tiny percent of the population are extremely sensitive to RF. Yet they do exist. No doubt one day we will understand the reason. As a precedent, Consider how our opinion changed when doctors discovered Mammalian meat allergy. Everyone believed that millions of people eat meat. So only wack jobs claim to get sick eating meat. Especially if they've been OK eating it all their life. But some people "suddenly" became allergic to meat. It took a dedicated doctor to discover that a) their sickness was due to being allergic to meat. & b) The allergic response was due to being bitten a tick with specific protein markers in its saliva. Thus I'd encourage you to look for the edge cases. As any computer programmer will tell you, understanding "the unlikely exceptions" are often where the greatest insights occur.
Hi, Thio Joe: you could also have mentioned the megawatts that we are exposed to from UHF television transmitters. If this radiation were so dangerous, we would all have died years ago!
Even your phone or pc that you use it to watch this video is using the light that using hundred of terahertz(when you increase brightness) for weeks or years and you still feel nothing.
You're going to have to do better than addressing the thermal and ionizing properties of EMF, because those who are genuinely concerned about it are bringing up entirely different points (purposely side-stepping the thermal and ionization aspects). In other words, you're not responding to what people are actually saying about it.
Not that I agree or disagree with your statement, but there are studies that have proven that there is some effect on the human brain within a spectrum of bandwidth. So even though you made it clear what your position is and I respect that, there is always going to be talk, discussion, study or argument on this topic. Though personally in my small personal office, I have both a wi-fi router that is fairly massive in terms of its coverage, far beyond what is needed for a small home in Taiwan to an almost reachable signal several floors below the 7th floor lol and I sit pretty much right next to it. If it is effecting me, than I am not really aware of it, but on the other hand, who knows. I also have my PC hardwired from the providers router, simply because I do not have a wi-fi option on my PC and I also get the full 100M access for my needs. I have wi-fi for my iMac, macbooks, phones and tablets when not being in the office.
The best video i’ve ever seen about Wi-Fi and radiation. You gave many examples making it easy to understand. I have been subscribed since the “satirical age” and I can definitely say that this is the best video you have.
Thank you ThioJoe for getting this non-sense straight! Very well constructed video! That must have taken a very long time to make! It was well worth watching! Even though I knew a lot about this already, I still learned useful info, like the Big Bang radio waves things. Yet another reason not to be concerned about this AT ALL!!
ThioJoe, I really like your videos. I have found them very helpful. However, I believe you missed the mark on this one. Google cres seed failed to germinate under WiFi. Also Google WiFi animal blood brain barrier. Where WiFi affected animal blood brain barrier. Please consider this and consider removing this an the other video.
I've never heard anyone claim WiFi was unsafe in the way you brought up the topic. Microwave Ovens, yes I've heard radiation warnings about (especially if they leak), but not wireless communications.
This is actually quite reassuring. Yeah, I can't eat microwaved food. It gives me stomach aches for some reason. I'm highly sensitive, so it could be that.
Jeeeez ,all it takes is one of millenial beeing,to shout out some absurd fact before even bothering to google real facts about it ,and rest of sheeps just starts to accept it as truth :facepalm: !!! But this is very very good explanatory video THUMBS UP !!!
Thank you for clarifying this issue. It is truly sad how many people actually believe this nonsense. It goes along with the issue of LED lighting being "dangerous" because of the rate of flashing it creates, (which it doesn't.)
Yonatan - The difficulty in this is that LED lamps do NOT flicker. Incandescent lamps do, but not very obviously because of the heat of the filament. Now, the ones which really make one question is the fluorescent bulbs. In many lower age children, fluorescent has been shown to agitate them, changing their activity levels.
Thank you ..for the last couple of days I've been trying to understand 5g and what it means and is it safe ..So you have explained it really well, excellent Thankyou.
Thio, I just want to thank you for explaining the NON-danger of WIFI. It was very entertaining and informative. Enjoyable like watching Neil DeGrasse Tyson explaining why Flat Earth Theory has no basis.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
You may notice the new "Join" button because of TH-cam's new memberships feature! I'll make a video explaining it more in detail later this week, but feel free to check it out early and see the perks and feel free to make suggestions. You can also go here: th-cam.com/users/ThioJoejoin
ThioJoe .i just noticed that when i read this...
ThioJoe Hey Thio thanks for making this video I always wanted to know the truth from a reliable person and you made this video.
+Itz Josh - Probably the i7 especially if you overclock
I see that "join" button and I ask, what is this? then I see this...
ThioJoe just curious to know, have you ever done a livestream on this channel or planning to do it in an upcoming time ?
Of course, Wi-fi is dangerous! It can destroy your computer, especially if it disconnects in the middle of a CS:GO competitive match!
Indirectly, because if it disconnects at the wrong time you destroy the computer yourself by smashing it.
TRUE LOOL
Csgo gey
But you can prevent that by putting a wire whisk on your router antennas. Oh how I miss those joke videos. I still get a laugh out of watching those today.
This is y i love this channel. Hope it goes back to that I don't know why there are so many idiots that actually believed in it and had to f up everything lol
Don't look directly at the Sun. It is high wattage.
Alex Disibio what is the wattage of the sun?
Bill Dude It is over 9000!
Alex Disibio Maybe they should switch the sun to use LEDs.
instead of sun look at the moon..it is low wattage
Golf Mc yes yes yes LEDs are more power efficient. And then we can make the sun RGB. LoL
This video could have had the perfect sponsorship segway - "The only Wifi that can ever hurt you is an insecure one, always use a VPN to keep your connection secured and encrypted"
Sponsored by nord vpn
Rohith Eppepalli, The perfect VPN segway: "Always use protection."
- Watchmen
Not everyone can be Linus, you know. 😛
@@Bobcat665 ha ha ha
Then the believers wouldn't trust this video.
So you say it’s not harmful but apple believes you need to keep you phone away from your body as much as possible. If you have an iPhone or ipad check under general>about>legal>rf exposure
“To reduce exposure to RF energy, use a hands-free option, such as the built-in speakerphone, the supplied headphones, or other similar accessories. Cases with metal parts may change the RF performance of the device, including its compliance with RF exposure guidelines, in a manner that has not been tested or certified.”
lol this is about the hands-free option lol. Literally nothing dangerous XD
I never get tired of learning how things work 👍
Error 404 same
Error 404 thats gay af
404 wifi danger not found
Same
Comment not found.
I got ligma from 5Ghz WiFi
Fire Master underrated comments
Sugondese goverment to ban WiFi, says President sucma.
Ligma is beacause of bofa
What's ligma?
Ligma Ballz
You forgot placebo effect
There's an old, news story about a Washington state town objecting to a cell phone tower having been installed. Some townspeople said they were feeling sick from it. Then the cell phone company pointed out that it hadn't been turned on yet.
dudev
You made me lol so hard 😂 😂 🤣
@@dudev LOL
@@dudev I wasn't able to find anything online about it, sounds like something I can use to convince my relatives with.
Where did you hear it from?
Microwave ovens are specifically tuned to the frequency of DiHydrogen Monoxide.
This chemical is a powerful industrial solvent.
Think about that for a moment...
A substance so addictive that you die if you stop drinking it
Not only that, but 100% of the people and animals who have ingested dihydrogenmonooxide have died!
Sean Nanoman PAHAHAHAH OMG, one can really make everything look scary, expecialy if you know a lot about chemistry! 😂😂😂
ThioJoe I would like to point out that alcohol is a solution.
Hahahahahahahahaha omigod this comment just cracks me up on the absurdity of people. But then again, they do say that ignorance is bliss.
science lecture with ThioJoe
Hello how thank you
Except he doesn't address what people are actually saying about EMF, which has nothing to do with the thermal or ionization aspects of it.
Robby Dyer z
do tanning beds work just off being big light bulbs that generate heat or do they give off dangerous radiation?
Those use specific lamps that generate an amount of UVA/UVB radiation; In Europe they are limited to 0,3 W/m2. Also note that tanning, in any form (sun or tanning bed) increases the risk of getting skin cancer.
Thank you so much for this explanation, my parents have been afraid of wifi and cell signals for years and I kept telling them they aren't harmful, maybe this will change their mind.👍
Well, call me a cynic if you like but I don't trust any wireless technology - why so? Within 9 months of me deciding to go from the old cable connection and purchasing a wi-fi box for my TV and PC, (for increased speed and what have you) a lump appeared on my neck and when I went to get it checked out by my GP I was referred to a specialist and diagnosed with throat cancer. Previously I was a non-smoker, non-drinker, regularly exercised, cycled, walked, etc and ate healthily.
Unfortunately, due to the small size of our house, I was sitting with the wif fi box right near me.
I have since undergone chemo and radiotherapy and after going through hell have finally been given the all-clear.... but I'm not the man I once was... all those treatments take something out of you.
So, no, I wouldn't recommend any of this... it's just not worth the ultimate price any of us may end up paying.
Another example: FM / AM radio stations , people have to work there and thay don't feel anything. Trust me I have been less than 100 feet away from one and didn't feel anything.
but how do i feel something if i touch my router
Double Dragon because you are touching it.
LOL
Because it affects over generations, specifically reproductive organs and prenatal. We are an experiment ongoing.
SurvivalistCookBook yes and there are study’s of radio workers having symptoms of Emf exposure I’m not sure what this guy is talking about
Ah, so does that mean I can stop living in my faraday cage house?
Doctors and scientists say microwave strikes may have caused sonic delusions and very real brain damage among embassy staff and family members. Look up the "Moscow Signal" . Russians beamed microwave "wifi" at A US embassy in Moscow. A ton of Employees working there ended up with all types of cancers.
There is more than enough peer reviewd research out there to prove WIFI is not safe for prolonged periods of time. Like we all are exposed to on a continual basis. Causes brain fog, fatigue, mood swings, learning disabilities, loss of motivation, neurological effects, and cancers. Has been studied since the Nazis.
C'mon people do just 5 minutes of genuine research on this topic. It affects us all! Type in "wifi health effects ncbi" in google. Studies from the government themselves admit that :
"Repeated Wi-Fi studies show that Wi-Fi causes oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis, cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload. Each of these effects are also caused by exposures to other microwave frequency EMFs, with each such effect being documented in from 10 to 16 reviews. "
@@Stefano-tb8ls Thanks, fearmonger.
*yawn
@@Stefano-tb8ls if that is the case, why are you here then?
@@rjaxxxas Because I love you ;)
If for no other reason this video was useful for me because I didn't realize that my microwave oven was using 2.4 gigahertz which is why it messed with my Wi-Fi and my cordless phone big time.
Yeah, I didn't realize it either until I saw it in my wifi usage list on phone, drove myself nuts trying to figure out who was busting in on my wifi.
*I think* if it messes with your wifi it's not shielded right. Microwave ovens are supposed to keep 100% of the "powerful" (more like "scary sounding") 1000W 2.4GHz radiation contained INSIDE the device. (I'm not a radiation scientist though. Maybe it's 99.9% shielded and so 0.01% is enough to somewhat mess up your wifi?) I did google it and found a positive result:
"In theory, a properly shielded microwave shouldn't leak any radiation, but the reality is that they leak quite a bit, resulting in electromagnetic, or radio-frequency (RF), interference. "
3ICE --Now a good question would be where the hell do you find a "good" nuker that is properly shielded? Don't believe even Consumer Reports tests the amount of shielding in the units, who would? Nobody.
yeah they are contained. The guys that build this stuff understand these things better than anyone watching this video. If close enough though a lot of things can interfere with other things
I do not want to live in your house, cordless phones are some of the worst things you can have in your home that is radiating the sh*t out of you 24/7 , get an EMF meter, know what you are dealing with and what is a safe distance
You didn’t cover how 5G can cause cancer, or sterilization. What about all the studies on those effects?
iHazer people are quick to jump to believe bullshit videos like this just to justify their addictions to modern technology I bet 90% who watched this weren’t willing to do even an hour of there own research. We are living in sad times
@@alex1239not That's correct recent studies are reporting it. This dork doesn't truly know thee answer, the scientific information is not definitive yet. The safety isn't known because there's still much we don't know about particle physics and the interactions between them
it cannot cause cancer... it literally makes no sense. It's impossible.
@James Sniderbeutiful
Bro cancer rates been going down lol
The larger the wavelength the more biologically stable it is. The smaller the wavelength the more harmful it is. The shorter waves rip apart DNA materials and causes cell damage/mutation. The type of frequency of nukes, radon gas, etc. WiFi uses Radio Frequency waves, EMF. The level of EMF is very high and can harm biological growth. I recommend you look up the plant WiFi experiment. In the plants, you can clearly see deterioration in itself based on how close or far away it is from the EMF omission. (Cell towers, cell phones, WiFi routers)
but why u no care about regular light its way smaller
great video there is a lot of great information here. However there are a few things i want to mention. First, the GHz to THz analogy is flawed. yes, a light bulb emits more radiation per unit of time than a WiFi router but the hazard of WiFi comes not from the 'brute force' (wattage) but from the penetrating power of the signal. as you mentioned water resonates at 2.4 GHz and since we are 70% water that can be a problem in the real world. The thought experiment that was setup was one single antenna router in a house with no neighbors. However, we live in the real world and most people live in apartments/condos with many neighbors that have multi antenna routers. (look up MIMO) a trick many WiFi device manufactures use to skirt the FCC wattage regulations is they only measure the output power at a un specified distance from the antennathe antenna. Eg, router is rated to broadcast at 100mw of power @ 10ft but, in reality broadcasts 400mw @ 10Ft because of having 4 antennas. The 802.11 A/B/G networks usually are rated at 100-200mw, 802.11 N usually broadcasts at 150 to 250 mw and 802.11AC broadcasts at up to 1000 mw (1 watt). Since manufactures are motivated by money and happy customers = higher profits they will sometimes rate a routers power at 5,10,15, or even 20ft and and call the level of transmitted radiation they measure the maximum rated power of the router. this is called the effective radiated power (wattage) aka ERP, this is not a true measure of power. the true measure of power is the transmitter output power (TOP) which is measured at the location where the antenna connects to the transmitter. going in to the gory details of antenna theory requires a understanding of college physics and calc 2+3. and one more thing, when you mentioned about low level radiation being less harmful than higher doses is the time constant. how large is the dose * the period of exposure. the reason we think small doses are not harmful is because our bodies are able to repair the damage being done before there is a issue. in parting keep this in mind, exposure at 100mw per hr for 100hr (1 week) is the same as being exposed to 10 watts for 1hr.
i say this because 99% of WiFi users leave the WiFi on 24/7/365 untill the router dies.
I am CompTIA A+, Net+, and security+ certified. as well as being a general class certified HAM radio operator.
of course wifi is dangerous, pretty much any wireless connection is susceptible to hijacking, blocking, etc. strangers can grab your personal info from thin air if you connect to the wrong open network, for example.
If WiFi is dangerous then ThioJoe is dangerous. Top 10 anime plot twists.
Hearts on both the comments O.O
He's not addressing what people are actually saying about WiFi/EMF which has nothing to do with the thermal or ionization aspects of it.
Ionizing radiation is not the only thing that can trigger cancer. when MITOCHONDRIA are stressed, dehydrated or unable to effectively transport electrons you get disease such as cancer or neuro-degenerative problems or autoimmune diseases.
Wifi is not dangerous but high ping is
Yes
Thanks for explaining!
WI FI turned me into a frog....croak croak..
TERRY. W and post
Crock crock
*ate a fly*
Im using wifi
Crock crock
did it also turn you gay? wifi is known to TURN THE FREAKING FROGS GAY
This video is great. I watched the original when it released on ThioJoeTech, and I appreciate you making a new one for the wider audience.
This video is great. I heard of stories of wifi and cellular technology being dangrous. This video really explained how it is not harmful at all. Thanks for the video.
phonepower mobile technically it is.
You'll need to spend about 90% of your life being constantly bombarded by 5ghz WiFi communication to notice *anything,* and by then you'll be deteriorating anyways.
Yes but it was a load of rubbish. A light globe is safe so wifi must be safe because they are all radiation, hmmmm. Thats like saying all salt is bad or all fat is bad . Just not true .Also he only compared the heating effects and did not mention the electromagnetic effects on humans of wifi
Thank you for explaining it to someone who has no idea and context as there is heaps of negative vids about Wifi and 5G with meters measuring the output which goes of the dial to materials to block it.
Wi-Fi can't hurt us only if it's open Wi-Fi that people are using stealing your data but mostly you're safe don't worry when you have your home Wi-Fi
A photon of infrared radiation coming from a baked potato has 1 million times more energy than a photon of microwave radiation.
If wifi was dangerous we would already be dead lmao
Rusty Blader Eh, not true. Like smoking, it could be killing us very slowly. I'm not saying it is, I'm saying what if. Back then, they thought smoking was safe too.
Maybe
At this time only weakened people will be in danger , baby's and old ! study it back to the 1960's in gov documentation and you will see what they are doing today!
and ofc I seem to attract the crazies...
I'm not crazy my mother had me tested
Finally! Someone who made a proper video about the subject. Im one of those people trying to explain the lock and key principle of ionizing radiation - for which the minimum is UV light. AND NOW WE HAVE A GOOD AND ACCURATE VIDEO FOR IT! You are gold, man! :D
You can weaponize the sun by focusing the light, big time. Be careful out there.
ban the sun
3d print a magnifying glass? NO! Actually, those little flexible ones for camping are pretty handy.
All those poor little ants...
Yes....poor over radiated "fire" ants
I heard that the ancient greeks did that. They made a giant magnifying glass to point at the enemy ships, and the ships burned.
Can WIFI affect pacemakers?
Devices that Can Interfere with Pacemakers
Wireless internet, mobile phones and modern security systems bring about new areas of risk. ... They produce a frequency that may interact with your pacemaker, but short exposure shouldn't trigger any adverse effects.
It should be noted that in Verizons own official pamphlet it labels all forms of RF, whether wifi or cellular as pollutants. Question, what is a pollutant?
And we all know that RF is totally harmless
If Wi-Fi is not dangerous going live next to a Wi-Fi tower see how long you last.
andrew fitzgerald lol i actually know a buddie who lives near a wifi tower, says it's fine. Birds love the tower to since they can sit on it :D so pretty lit. Especially with fast speed
I actually live near a Wi-Fi tower.
See, ... this is why I use a candle exclusively and my internet connection is a hollow log with sticks. And, I stay out of the sun.
Honestly, I'm impressed on how in depth you got in this. Great thorough explanation :)
he's not a biologist. TLDR: no, it is not safe.
@@MaximumEfficiency we have been exposed to wifi for years now, are you dead and are we dead? No, we aren't.
yes, number of people with chronic illness is at all time high
@@MaximumEfficiency even before WiFi, bruh.
Best tech channel.
I live in a small apartment and my infant son has his playpen near our WiFi router about two feet away, is that safe? Watching your video I’m pretty sure it is but I need some reassurance so I know I’m not putting him in harms way.
Let's be serious over here im poor. I don't have a house. So I don't own a WiFi. I don't even have electricity.
Man that sucks 🙁
Chikapu ofc
How are you watching this then?
Refract Plays how are you watching this and charging a device??
The Real Savage Gamer well I beated the school authorities and use them.
Karen and boomer: visible confusion
The Wi-Fi is turning the frogs gay
its because with wifi they're watching gay porn XD
XxX_Mazeflow_XxX --How do ya know when a frog is "gay?" Does it do the gay "walk?" Got me curious now and I have no freakin idea why.
True though
@@teero1292 They put on pantyhose and sashay around the pond.
No that's all the pesticides & herbicides in our environment
I literally just gave this explanation on a thread on Facebook. I can see how confusing it can be for someone who didn't really grasp physics properly at school but education doesn't work equally well for everyone..
how arent u a master scientist/physicist by now???????!
he is, basically
because this is general knowledge! At least it should be.....
Bcz Google exist! Duh.
I'm from Nigeria,lived in Nigeria literally upto this very moment lol,but I'm like a Tech god when i speak and do things because of Thiojoe, thanks man. People just don't understand things the way they're supposed to, I've had a few questions in mind tho but I'm sure you'll explain it someday.
lol why am I watching this video? I don't even have WiFi😂-😄-🤨-😣-😢
How did you view the video without WiFi?
Neil Tyson's "Astrophysics for People in a Hurry" learned me that the Cosmic Microwave Background wasn't present until a few years, give or take 400,000 years, after the big bang. Good book for my level of I.Q. (Neil's awesome). So it's been around forever minus 400,000 years. Let's not forget about background ionizing radiation here on Earth or even worse Radon in an enclosed home or building. I'm way more concerned about those sources than my in-home wifi. Great Video.
Thank you for the great information
Its also important to note that "radiation" is a generic scientific term for any type of energy that radiates. Every form of energy can be said to radiate and this term should not be confused with nuclear radiation which is a very specific kind of energy and can be deadly. Radio waves and light waves are often referred to as radiation and there is nothing in common between that and nuclear radiation. But people who want to make sensationalistic claims will often ignore the difference. The misinformed will often accidentally or purposefully confuse the two just to have something scary to claim. The only similarity between nuclear radiation and the other forms of energy called radiation is that just like the cosmic background radiation, there is also a tiny background amount of nuclear radiation that we are all exposed to every day. It doesn't matter how close you live to a nuclear plant, its everywhere. If you have granite countertops, you likely have a higher dose of trace radiation than someone who does not since granite counterrtops are a known source of trace (low does) nuclear radiation.
Thanks for the video, man. Same goes for bluetooth, right?
Yep
Thanks!
I really wished there would be a BT class 1.5, as the class 2 "10 meter" often won't penetrate the wall when I walk into my kitchen.
johanponken don't worry, BT 5 will sort that out.
Bluetooth is even less power than a router. It's barely enough power to get from one side of the room to the other side. It's not enough radio-frequency (RF) power to warm up anything at all.
Thank you so much. I recently moved to an apartment complex and see 7 WiFi signals. I was pretty worried.
Valid in India or not
valid everywhere
Internet isn't valid in India. Sorry pal
i don't think wifi exists in china
Now I'm worried about lightbulbs too
You sir are promoting the view of the industry, which fails to take into account non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Many researchers have been finding a myriad of negative effects on the human biology/physiology from low emitting frequencies well below industry safety standards. What many fail to understand is that our cells do not communicate for the most part via chemical reactions, fast communication is done through the use of specific frequencies. This is why in the literature you find certain frequencies have health benefits (e.g. can accelerate tissue repair). The question that scientists (not in the US because we are bought out by big industry) have started to answer is if the frequencies from wireless communication devices (cell phone towers, wifi routers, cell phones, etc.) cause harm to humans. The answer from NON-INDUSTRY sponsored studies is a resounding yes, they do cause many detrimental biological effects. You also left out that most wireless communication devices communicate via pulsed EMFs, which have been shown to carry more health risks compared to non-pulsed EMFs. For better information from actual SCIENTISTS I would recommend looking up Martin Pall, PhD, Martin Blank, PhD, Olle Johansson PhD. If you actually want to see what the research has to say go directly to the sources of information. Stop listening to this third party resource who clearly needs to integrate his knowledge of physics with how the human body functions.
Thank you!
Can you link to any of these negative effects? Also, cells can't produce low frequencies, they literally do communicate via chemicals. The only way certain frequencies will benefit you is to maybe ease you to sleep. Also, can you please link to ANY of these studies rather than just saying "many scientists say this"? Also I think Martin Pall has been charged for quite a few things.
@@sethadkins546 I gave you the name of the scientists. If you wish to look at the harmful effects found you can simply go to Google Scholar or Pubmed and find the studies. I am not going to do your homework for you or engage in long arguments. This is not a place to write a dissertation. A good book with through citations is by Robert Becker PhD called "The Body Electric". His student, Andrew Morino PhD also has books and articles finding harmful effects. Thinking and knowing are two different things in regards to Dr. Pall. If you are going to disregard him please have solid evidence to share. His theories have been under scrutiny, but not his character. Please refer to the other scientists I listed if he is unsatisfactory. In any area of research, theories and ideas will fail. Yet, if you care to do your own investigation you will find harmful effects well below industry standards for many things, not just cell phones. I wrote my comment to pass along information, not to write an article thoroughly fleshing out all arguments/points of view. If you want that you will have to do it yourself. Best of luck. JMJ
But why some people say that they "feel" wireless?
Is that a placebo effect or something?
They are wrong. Unless it's some other side effect like buzzing sounds from defective electronics or something.
Yes it's similar to the placebo effect but in a negative way if you made a person think he has a allergy from let's say honey they will start to feel sick after eating something that they know has honey but they must know it has honey if they don't it would not take effect
Damn, I was planning on building a tank with 100 routers on it...
One router
two routers better
@@dragalia9008 no, 3
Light is destructive.
I mean...all one has to do is take a look at the piles of white dust that are the result of my mother's wrath...
Joe, I will never understand why people always say to fear the dark...
It is pure light that is the truest assassin...
good video but could attract the haters who will not let you alone...sadly
People scare easily when they have no knowledge on the topic, Excellent cast!
Hi ThioJoe. I liked your logic, but I think it is incomplete. I have a university degree in Computing & Electrical Engineering. I mention this purely so you might reflect, prior to dismissing my comments as uneducated, crackpot. While I think you covered the common uneducated fear associated with this technology, analyzing the Man - Machine interface is often more complex than looking at one or two dimensions.
Personally I get headaches when using Cordless Phones that transmit at 2.4 GHz or 5.8 GHz. I'm OK if the phone is only 900MHz.
Same with mobile (cell) phones. The effect is worst when inside cars & lifts (I assume this is due to a partial Faraday cage). The headache starts 2 to 5 mins after I start using them & stops ~5 - 10 mins later. Wifi Routers do not affect me, likely they are lower wattage & further away from me.
I realise that your talk is focused on WiFi, however your logic is applicable to phone transmission as well. So you might be interested.
The two dimensions you might like to consider are distance & harmonics.
No doubt you are aware that the signal strength is inversely proportional to distance squared. The Phones only impact me if they are broadcasting less than 3 feet from my head.
As energy increases with frequency, your logic that higher frequency can "do more damage" is well proven. However frequency is only one dimension that needs to be examined when considering impact on biology. Harmonics are another. You only need to look at antenna design to see that the energy absorbed (standing waves) are much greater when the size of an item is optimized for the frequency of the transmission. Similarly certain molecules (ie: water) will respond to specific frequencies, while remaining comparatively unaffected by frequencies above & below it. Research shows that phone use can raise the temperature of your brain slightly. Perhaps some people are sensitive to this. Maybe this changes the blood circulation in the scalp. or perhaps influences the nerves to cause scalp muscles to contract. Who knows.
I have no idea why millions of people use mobile phones without issue, yet a tiny percent of the population are extremely sensitive to RF. Yet they do exist. No doubt one day we will understand the reason.
As a precedent, Consider how our opinion changed when doctors discovered Mammalian meat allergy.
Everyone believed that millions of people eat meat. So only wack jobs claim to get sick eating meat. Especially if they've been OK eating it all their life.
But some people "suddenly" became allergic to meat. It took a dedicated doctor to discover that a) their sickness was due to being allergic to meat. & b) The allergic response was due to being bitten a tick with specific protein markers in its saliva.
Thus I'd encourage you to look for the edge cases. As any computer programmer will tell you, understanding "the unlikely exceptions" are often where the greatest insights occur.
Thank you!
Just wear a tinfoil hat and you'll be fine.
yooooooo now that makes sense XD
Hi, Thio Joe: you could also have mentioned the megawatts that we are exposed to from UHF television transmitters. If this radiation were so dangerous, we would all have died years ago!
Thank you, Thio, for this video. Made things more clear !
Even your phone or pc that you use it to watch this video is using the light that using hundred of terahertz(when you increase brightness) for weeks or years and you still feel nothing.
You're going to have to do better than addressing the thermal and ionizing properties of EMF, because those who are genuinely concerned about it are bringing up entirely different points (purposely side-stepping the thermal and ionization aspects).
In other words, you're not responding to what people are actually saying about it.
yes he is
Very Informative, cleared up a lot of my misconceptions. How are you so smart? Degree in computer science or physics?
general degree in science and minor in physics
Really !! And you ONLY have a TH-cam channel !! My goodness you deserve MORE !! Thank you for clearing this up once and for all !!
What is your qualifications to speak on the biological effects of microwave energies?
lol whats yours or the people saying wifi is bad
@@the33rdguy he didnt even say anything...
Penetration through objects is also dependant on the skin depth which is inversely proportional to the frequency
Not that I agree or disagree with your statement, but there are studies that have proven that there is some effect on the human brain within a spectrum of bandwidth. So even though you made it clear what your position is and I respect that, there is always going to be talk, discussion, study or argument on this topic. Though personally in my small personal office, I have both a wi-fi router that is fairly massive in terms of its coverage, far beyond what is needed for a small home in Taiwan to an almost reachable signal several floors below the 7th floor lol and I sit pretty much right next to it. If it is effecting me, than I am not really aware of it, but on the other hand, who knows. I also have my PC hardwired from the providers router, simply because I do not have a wi-fi option on my PC and I also get the full 100M access for my needs. I have wi-fi for my iMac, macbooks, phones and tablets when not being in the office.
Jr C did you listen to a word he said
Liron Segev is the one who proved Wi Fi destroys plant life.
I know you mean well, though.
Other than this, thank you for all your hard work.
Everyone knows that a gigga hurts haha its in the name people lol.... ok Ill shut up now :-D
lol
The best video i’ve ever seen about Wi-Fi and radiation. You gave many examples making it easy to understand. I have been subscribed since the “satirical age” and I can definitely say that this is the best video you have.
0:36 "there are acctuall idiots out there.... fake stuff" doesn't sound familiar to you huh Joe???
Thank you ThioJoe for getting this non-sense straight! Very well constructed video! That must have taken a very long time to make! It was well worth watching! Even though I knew a lot about this already, I still learned useful info, like the Big Bang radio waves things. Yet another reason not to be concerned about this AT ALL!!
Nice vid!
Why should I trust the guy who said sticking a stick with leaves in your phone will extend your wifi range?
GoodGamer3000 that was back in the old days when he used to use his channel for comedy
Yes, I realize that. Thank you.
I showed my grandma this and she said
WHY IS HE RANTING AND RAVING
Yeah am way more worried about the sun than my phone
Nice vid❤
What about SAR (Specific Absorption Rate) which is considered harmful and carcinogenic by the World Health Organization?
ThioJoe, I really like your videos. I have found them very helpful. However, I believe you missed the mark on this one. Google cres seed failed to germinate under WiFi. Also Google WiFi animal blood brain barrier. Where WiFi affected animal blood brain barrier. Please consider this and consider removing this an the other video.
I've never heard anyone claim WiFi was unsafe in the way you brought up the topic. Microwave Ovens, yes I've heard radiation warnings about (especially if they leak), but not wireless communications.
Oh my God the emojis in your join thing 😂😂😂
Valen The Chipmunk ikr? 😂😂😂
it's not a question, it's a reality.
Is it valid in India?
No only in the republic of America, sorry pal!
XxX_Mazeflow_XxX hello this will work in the republic of canehdeh eh?
You should have talked more about the electromagnetic spectrum and that just UV, xray and gamma radiation is harmful
he did
That moment when a Karen realizes that Light is more radioactive than 5GHZ: jimmy we need to escape into a cave, come on jimmy pack your bags
What qualifications, experience, test equipment and personal studies have you done to verify your claims?
i had wifi into my bedroom effected my sleep badly, since removed no problem
So you're saying we should freeze the universe to absolute zero so we don't die from radiation?
Yes Wi-Fi is dangerous. Because when I stand to close to a router my short term memory gets bad and I drool on myself.
Wifi is dangerous since it gives me addictions to instagram and snapchat
This is actually quite reassuring. Yeah, I can't eat microwaved food. It gives me stomach aches for some reason. I'm highly sensitive, so it could be that.
DarthShadie faulty microwave maybe?
omran panda Maybe. Everyone else in the house uses it and they are fine. It just affects me. So if it IS faulty, it's subtle.
Jeeeez ,all it takes is one of millenial beeing,to shout out some absurd fact before even bothering to google real facts about it ,and rest of sheeps just starts to accept it as truth :facepalm: !!!
But this is very very good explanatory video THUMBS UP !!!
Thank you. Such complete idiots commenting here
Thank you for clarifying this issue. It is truly sad how many people actually believe this nonsense. It goes along with the issue of LED lighting being "dangerous" because of the rate of flashing it creates, (which it doesn't.)
The flickering might not be dangerous, but it can hurt your eyes or give you epilepsy!
Yonatan - The difficulty in this is that LED lamps do NOT flicker. Incandescent lamps do, but not very obviously because of the heat of the filament. Now, the ones which really make one question is the fluorescent bulbs. In many lower age children, fluorescent has been shown to agitate them, changing their activity levels.
5G ... vs ... 5 GHz
Can you now talk about DEW (Direct Energy Weapon)?
in conclusion:it only hurts vampires.
Thank you ..for the last couple of days I've been trying to understand 5g and what it means and is it safe ..So you have explained it really well, excellent Thankyou.
Please visit: Environmental Health Trust . Org for ALOT more information on this topic!
Thio, I just want to thank you for explaining the NON-danger of WIFI. It was very entertaining and informative. Enjoyable like watching Neil DeGrasse Tyson explaining why Flat Earth Theory has no basis.