Samyang 1.7x Anamorphic MF Adapter [Test Footage and Review]
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 มิ.ย. 2024
- I was sent a prototype Samyang 1.7x Anamorphic MF Adapter to try out. It converts lenses from the V-AF lens kit to anamorphic. Find out more: bdn.li/LK-Samyang
Samyang Cine V-AF Lenses:
24mm: geni.us/samyangvaf24mm
35mm: geni.us/samyangvaf35mm
45mm: geni.us/samyangvaf45mm
75mm: geni.us/samyangvaf75mm
100mm: geni.us/samyangvaf100mm
Lens Station: geni.us/samyanglensstation
🔴 Checkout my Gimbal Course: gimbalmasterclass.com/
🎥 Learn how I make films at filmschool.us/brandon-li-2024
Music & SFX by audiio. Try Audiio Pro! You'll get 70% off your first year using my code: brandon70
audiio.com/brandonli
My Portfolio Page: vimeo.com/rungunshoot
✅ Subscribe: / @brandonliunscripted
👉 Filmmaking FAQ: unscripted.com/faq
👉 All Gear: unscripted.com/gear
👉 My Portfolio: www.vimeo.com/rungunshoot
👉 Instagram: / brandon_l_li
✅ For Business Inquiries only (no questions please): business@unscripted.com
==============================
✅ Recommended Playlists:
👉 Brandon's Film School
• FAQ's: All my gear (an...
👉 Short Films
• The Shipping Yard: Sun...
👉 Cinematic Vlog
• 11 30 16 Cinematic Vlog
✅ Other Videos You Might Be Interested In Watching:
👉 Are the Samyang Cine V-AF Lenses really for filmmakers? [Honest Review] • Are the Samyang Cine V...
👉 First Anamorphic Zoom Lens You Can Afford: Laowa Nanomorph ZOOM 28-55mm & 50-100mm TESTED • First Anamorphic Zoom ...
👉 Affordable anamorphic lens kit for solo shooters: Sirui Saturn 35mm, 50mm, 75mm [Footage & Review] • Affordable anamorphic ...
===========================
0:00 Cinematic intro
0:23 What is the anamorphic adapter?
0:47 Sample Footage
2:19 How the anamorphic adapter works
3:24 Is it autofocus?
4:22 Why this adapter is great for travel filmmakers
5:06 Soft focus mode
6:26 Is the adapter gimbal friendly?
7:04 Why no filter threads?
8:13 Overall thoughts
9:50 Do I recommend it?
#samyang #v-af #anamorphic #filmmaking #cinematography - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
![Are the Samyang Cine V-AF Lenses really for filmmakers? [Honest Review]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Uo3_JG9nsrc/mqdefault.jpg)
![ไม่ต้องมีที่ที่ให้ฉันอยู่ แต่ขอแค่มีฉันอยู่ก็พอ (Spaceless) - getsunova [SHORT FILM]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MuT0d_cvJkc/mqdefault.jpg)
The adapter I was using is a prototype. What do you think of the look?
Bokeh looks terrible
I like the look, especially 100mm looks so dreamy (4:53), beautiful.
I second here. Horrible bokeh, flares are very very bad. This is probably one of the worst anamorphic adapter on the market.
2:12 I think the shots of focus breathing actually work really well. I find the zoom effect pleasing and appropriate in the way it emphasizes the shift of attention.
Some looks quite epic.
Great review. I however find that in the sample footage the squeeze seems off? Like it’s squeezed too much? It looks somewhat unnatural..
Holy barrel distortion Batman! Thanks for the great review as always, Brandon!
This footage looks insane buddy!
Sick Brandon! Amazing shots as always and solid review 🙌 I've been enjoying the Cine-AF lenses and the adapter has been interesting. The lack of threading is a bummer. I need to pick up a matte box for it with some mist and ND filters.
amazing footage! ❤🔥
Those shots from Tarragona are great
Love anamorphic lens!
Brandon Li is the only true TH-cam Film maker. Everyone else is just a TH-camr. When watching his vdieos your watching a film maker artwork. It's good to see he has kept himself true instead of selling out
Thank you, you answered all the questions I had about this, especially Gimbal balancing. Nice thoughts in the end aboit just switching to spherical when in need of AF or Gimbal moves 👍
The interchangeability with the v-af spherical lenses is what is most appealing to me. Using the same kit for anamorphic/spherical
@@BrandonLiUnscriptedswitch to spherical and edit post will crop many areas right?
Lovely to-the-point review as always, Brandon. Thank you. Yes, not being autofocus breaks the USP of the series. Looks like a version launched out of senior management pressure! Hope they are now peacefully working on the autofocus version. Btw, that soft focus will make my audience think i screwed up my shot.. It doesn't look like a deliberate effect at all.
Additionally, my RS 4 focus motor was unable to drive the focus ring of the adapter. So a more powerful follow focus would be needed.
@@BrandonLiUnscripted thanks Brandon 🙏
How did you setup the IBIS? Did you need to adjust the focal length accordingly?
Fantastic review. Great footage, very clear statement of pros and cons, and who the lens is best suited for. I'll add "price / performance" to the benefit list, compared to full set of anamorphic lenses (much cheaper!) or with other anamorphic adapters (much better visual quality). Something you didn't cover and I haven't heard mention: Does manual focus adjust BOTH the anamorphic adapter and the base lens, to get best performance across the whole focusing range? Or to minimize focus breathing? I would guess "yes", but I'd like to know more. Lastly: I really want to thank you for that last suggestion for using both anamorphic and spherical footage (appropriately cropped). That is probably my use case when I step up to this level of gear.
I'll add that I probably won't buy the adapter due to the "capsule pill" bokha. I also don't have a compelling need given current and near future projects. But I'm looking forward to future versions and improvements.
I don’t know the technical answer, but there is noticeable breathing (which I consider desirable in anamorphics). Focus is controlled by a single ring on the adapter. On longer focal lengths, I did notice considerably less sharpness at minimum focus with wide aperture.
hi mr. Li, can you put in the description which lens combination was used.
Hi Brandon new subscriber thanks for this videos! Are you using your phone as a monitor to live view the anamorphic? What app/phone do you use for this? I want to have a lightweight setup with this anamorphic adapter and don’t want to buy an external monitor if I could use my phone to live view the image. Thanks in advance 🙏🏻
I use Monitor+ app, search my channel for the video about it
Great review Brandon! Could you use the anamorphic adapter if you have a 58mm filter mounted on the lens?
No because the filter would block the mounting mechanism
@@BrandonLiUnscripted Thanks a lot!
If only they made Cine AF Anamorphic lenses 🤷♂
Oh yesss
Great review, thank you. May I ask which timeline resolution you choose with the 1.7 squeeze?
I forget the numbers but it was 2.39 aspect
Appreciate the honest review. I'm disappointed that Samyang wasn't able to make this autofocus. AF would have made them stand out from the rest of the budget anamorphics out there. While this may be great for those who have the set of Samyang Cine AF lenses, it doesn't stand out enough for the price tag. Sirui and Blazar seem to understand the pulse of the consumers while Samyang continues to make head-scratching products. I root for them and want them to succeed since more competition in the space is better for us all, but they're just wasting their resources on products like this.
Thanks for your perspective. As someone who owns nearly the whole V-AF set, this adapter makes great sense for me. Shooting in anamorphic will always be a sideline, in all likelihood. As for "why only manual focus anamorphic adapter", I have two guesses, and then a tentative prediction. First, autofocus depends on interaction between camera lens and camera body, and there maybe some fundamental restrictions on auto focus algorithms in camera that don't work well in anamorphic. Might result in too much "hunting" or other undesirable artifacts. Second, there's the issue of cost and weight. They would need to put autofocus motors in the adapter, which definitely adds cost and maybe some weight. A heavier and more costly adapter might have less broad appeal. Last, my prediction is that Samyang will come out with an autofocus version of this adapter in a year or so, but it might cost $400 more (%40). I have no inside information other than a general idea how long it takes to engineer complex products in a new product line.
What other possible gear they can make to connect to the lens?
I wonder if they considered making a AF version eventually
Does it have a constant squeeze factor?
A huge fan forever and always.
Amazing imagery 👍
Regarding ND’s, have you considered clip-in filters? They are set at a certain strength though, but maybe a ND32 is flexible enough for most daylight situations?
I really need variable NDs for the way I shoot. If I need to shuffle static ND filters all day I will be too slow.
@@BrandonLiUnscriptedI get that. Lets all hope one of the next sensortech devs will be some sort of fullframe on-sensor electronic ND. ✌️
Thanks for sharing. No AF is hugh bummer. That would have been the smart ideal about it.
I don't think anamorphic lenses will have AF by how it works.
Anamorphic lens compresses the very wide image to the same square sensor, the AI on camera will be hard to find focus hence compressed image.
Would be nice on Panasonic with their stabilization.
I think they avoided the filter thread because it'd cause vignetting? Can't think of any other reason but would be good to ask them.
Agree about the weird rounded rectangle bokeh... But benefits seem to outweigh the cons.
You can strip down Tilta Mirage vnd using Lightweight Filter Clamp-On Adapter
Good to know
@@BrandonLiUnscripted I tested this out. It works well on the 45, 75 and 100 on full frame, but results in worse vignetting on the 35mm
You can use this adapter in Cine DS Line?
Hi Brandon you could use the Tilta Lightweight Filter Clamp-On Adapter (95 mm) in combination with Tilta mirage VND to solve mounting problems with Samyang Anamorphic adapter. Although the VND is not perfect (colour shift and vignetting wide lenses) Tahnx for shairing your thoughts with us! Cheers Mitchell
Thanks for the tip!
Who is that cutie shot with the 45mm lens? 😩 asking for a friend lol
No filter thread is going to be a huge killer for so many I'm sure of it! I am also struggling to love the overall character, I love the overly textured Bokeh but it still doesn't look quite right in many places.. It's an expensive kit to also still be working with an adapter, as it's extra things to change with each lens swap ect and I am concerned the tolerance will loosen overtime and the adapter will wiggle on the end of the mount causing havoc.
Awesome review (big fan here!). But besides the lack of flare and center sharpness... I don't see much of a difference compare to a cheap $30 Ultra Wide adapter that screws on the front of the lens. Let me explain, on my EOS-M with Magic Lantern I can shoot natively at 2.35:1 aspect ratio, the UWL adapter mounted on top of my Sigma 16mm F1.4 or the 22mm F2, and I get similar bokeh, blurred edges with center sharpness all the while getting different cinematic aspect ratios (2.35:1, 2.39:1, 2:1, 2.20:1, etc.) I recently uploaded a video reviewing the UWL adapter.
So after seeing your results, I'm so happy with my Ghetto Anamor-fake look with my EOS-M. 😅
@9:35 about the balancing issue: Have you tried placing a mic or an external monitor to add weight in the rear and help with balance?
Anamorphic changes not just wide angle distortion but also bokeh shape and character, image compression, rendition of human faces, and of course lens flares. It’s complicated. Regarding balance, adding top-mounted accessories would make my setup taller, causing problems with inverted mode.
Cool!✌️
@brandonliunscriped Look the "95mm clamp to M95x0.75 female thread adapter" from RafCamera => 95mm clamp to 95mm female thread. I ordered it, with a VND 95mm, hope it wont vignette on the 35mm.
Btw, looks like it's not 1.7 squeeze to me, more or less 1.6 here
Something is up with the bokeh, it's as if the bokeh is smushed together. Can't really tell exactly what it is, but it,s too sharp and segmented i guess. The squeeze factor changing during close focusing is expected. My thought is that the weird bokeh has to do something with the glass itself.
Hey bro, I should receive mine in few days, but why not using clip on sensor nd ? It's the easiest way to avoid lens clip-on, and i am pretty sure i'ts way easier to change lens quickly ! I will go for this for sure ! I am just afraid for the front lens naked.
Otherwise, for the balance, you have the counterweight from smallrig which I use, very compact and easy to use. I can"t wait to try this on my Crane 4, which has pretty strong motors.
BTW, we can see that Samyang always present their adapter as MF adapter, maybe their will be a AF adapter in few years ! But it will be very heavy.
Finally, have you a feedback about IS ? I wonder if wen can activate the steadyshot in manual mode, and find something near our focal lentgh ?
Thanks bro, always good to wqtch your video since years
Because I need a variable nd, not fixed. I change my ND value almost every shot
@@BrandonLiUnscripted Yes but it's a easy and cheap way to find an alternative to this situation ! Otherway, you need to go to a mattebox, which I don't like either
lindseyoptics is selling for not cheap 110$ a clamp-on to filter thread in 95mm, which should be perfect foir the adapter, I will buy it for surre !
Why does it look like the footages are not de-squeezed enough..?
Why not use a mofage poco Brandon ?
Only works with adapted lenses. This kit is native e mount
Can it be used in other lenses?
No.
Now if Samyang would finally make these lenses for a mount other than E-mount OR upgrade the fronts of the DSX lenses to accept this adapter.
Nikon will be next to the VAFs
Some of the shots look squeezed... like the desqueeze factor was set incorrectly...
It's likely synchro focus so the squeeze changes depending on the focus distance
How much
Background looks much worse than proper anamorphic glass. Way too busy
I suppose this is part of the cost vs performance trade off of anamorphic adapters vs. native anamorphic lenses. I believe that the cinematographer / DP can make choices for lens focal length, aperture, shutter speed, ISO, distance-to-subject to manage or minimize the "background busyness". I haven't done full price comparison, but isn't the full V-AF set (minus 20mm) + anamorphic adapter much less costly than a comparable (T1.9, 1.7:1 squeeze) native anamorphic set? Isn't the latter 3X to 10X more expensive?
The squeeze factor looks off in some of the clips.
BLAZAR Anamorphic Lenses!!!!
probably back clip on nd or sensor clip on nd the only solution
Please... No one seems to be telling us if these are synchro focus or not. I'm guessing since no one is saying that it is a constant squeeze, that it is synchro focus...
You can't obviously tell when using it or looking at the lens while focusing. Distance data is communicated to the Sony camera though as you focus. My gut feeling is that it is single focus - and the "soft focus" uncouples the two focus points to achieve that disjointed look.
@@JonGordonTV if you look closely at at the optics, it seems like a synchro focus setup. Some people have commented that the squeeze looks off and if it variable squeeze that would explain it
@@heroaomedia Following up. I tested it out with a Helios 58mm as the taking lens, and the 1.7x handheld in front. I was wrong. To change focus, you need to adjust the focal distance on both the taking lens and the anamorphic element.
i seriously hope beginners dont waste their money on these... double onion rings haha.
It seems the term "cine lens" is getting used pretty liberally
Yeah the bokeh looks weird.
Just like any other anamorphic lens.
I have to say the bokeh is the deal breaker for me. It either looks like Tylenol capsules or Taco shells to me, depending on the lens, and I don't find either of those shapes particularly appealing for general anamorphic work. If I were shooting a drug or Mexican food commercial then then perhaps that would have some appeal, but give me ovals for almost everything else.
The whole reason these lenses were supposed to exist is because they had electronic contacts on the front to allow smart adapters. So the fact that they released a fully manual adapter makes zero sense to me. Pass
U would rather have a manual lens when film making because U don't want the shot to jump focus accidently only to realise after the shoot. For solo filming and some shoots where it may not be so particular it may be ok. But for instances where U are paying actors etc U want to control the focus. Esp for purposeful creative decisions.
@@spoon1882 haha, no. That's ONE way to do it. There are MANY situations you want AF.
@@spoon1882yep, but why u bought af lens with electric connection… to install mf anamorphic adapter?😅
@@demonhogoexactly. Having the option for Af ist amazing.
Aren’t the electronic contacts what make this adapter possible? Without electronic contacts, how would it:
- lock the taking lens to infinity focus
- set up soft focus mode
I think squeezing still needs work. it's like the people have long faces
First
Second.
Third
Third
@@justinlouie6802 third third...
cant autofocus lol. then whats the point
but ngl the melty bokeh looks good
Its an adapter that turns your set of lenses into anamorphics for a very compelling price. Thats the point.
Was interested until that bokeh
okmim
Plasticky Sony skin tones and gaudy colours.
Shit, no character, look is too sharp and the flare is shit too