I watch a towing company that has their own TH-cam channel. The driver records everything with a camera strapped to his chest plus multiple cameras on his truck. So easy these days!
Take that to its logical conclusion. If they take 10 or 15 pictures per vehicle you have to multiply that by how many vehicles they tow in a month. Where are they going to store all those images or videos just incase they get sued?
My father in law owned his own towing company for 40 years. Before cell phones he took pictures. Then started with the videos because everyone always wants to blame the tow truck for damage. I hope this guy now has started recording every tow his company makes.
The scratch was not the problem. The torn bumper was. They should’ve been forthcoming about the preexisting scratch but it still was separate from the bumper damage. I think the video with him threatening to cause financial problems with the tow company sunk him so it made him look like he was setting the tow company up.
The problem was there was already damage to the bumper but the plaintiff claims there was not any prior damage. At that point, credibility is the issue.
The video shows the passenger side bumper intact. When the car is driven out of the tow yard the passenger side bumper was pulled away. You can see a gap.
@@Raptor19153 And the plaintiff swears there was no damage to the bumper. When Judge Milan brought up the fact there was an insurance claim to the driver’s side, the story was then it was different damage. Then it is a credibility issue.
@@Raptor19153 The second video didn't show the passenger side bumper but it does show some preexisting damage. The issue is that most of this relied on the plaintiff's testimony about the damage and once he got caught lying, his testimony was no longer credible.
Right! That lil scratch on the video before the tow did not show the bumper pulled off. I hate when the judge get so caught up in feeling “played” they start over looking the evidence
Yeah but the fact that they said earlier that there "wasn't any prior damage" to the car prior to the car being towed, then they gave the judge a video of the car having damage and seemed to have "forgotten" about it (even though they sent in claims to insurance about the prior damage even before the tow thing happened) - that made the plaintiffs look like they were lying, and in a case like this, the judge has to decide who is more culpable, and that tipped the scales over to the defendant's side.
Damage was different but I think the lying then getting caught they actually put a claim for the bumper two days before they claimed the tow damaged the same bumper looks very suspicious. When it’s unclear who was at fault the person who can’t be trusted mostly loses the case when lack of evidence. Yes some damage was on the other side which I think the judge missed but they also were claiming the tow company did the same damage from the 15 cause in that video he’s say oh no oh no taking video of the same damage as if he was shocked to see that scratch he knew was there already. I think that’s what got the judge heated
@@DonziGT230 The second video didn't show the passenger side of the bumper. The issue for the plaintiff is that he was caught lying so he was not a credible witness, and the evidence was his testimony that the tow driver caused the damage versus the tow sheet that marked damage to bumper. Plaintiff was unable to meet his burden because he was not credible.
When I heard the plaintiff in the video describing the damage "Oh my God..." You could feel he was acting out. Plaintiffs did the damage before the tow .
Yeah. First he made it clear he is a victim. You nailed it exactly tho. He's video taping as the car comes out and then gets all dramatic saying "Oh my God!. Liars and scammers
12:45 JMM is BLIND. We're talking about the bumper being PULLED OFF/PULLED FORWARD on the passenger side of the car. That's NOT on the original video on the the video when it came out of the tow yard. That's clearly NOT from being hit but from being pulled by the tow truck. DUH. This has NOTHING to do with the damage on the driver's side at the front headlight. NOTHING. That is separate damage.
That's what I'm saying about her continuing to show her true self. The other side of that bumper was almost torn off, and she wants to call a scratch a hit. The absolute madness. She asked if the car was hit. They said no. The scratch may have been there, and they just noticed it.. It's a loaner, duh. She makes judges look bad. Just complete trash.
Glad I’m not the only one that saw she missed that and the plaintiff didn’t even point it out. The earlier video before the tow showed the bumper cover attached and not hanging off the clips like the video after the tow.
It was obvious to me that the tow damage was on the passenger side (separated bumper) but only the driver's side was made the focus. Sometimes all the yelling and not listening can confuse and fluster people...., especially in court. No patience here. The judge got stuck on a thought process and that's all she knew. Smh
Yeah...I thought they all did that now...The tow companies here do that...Even if the car is smashed, they still take a picture before they drag it onto the flatbed
The plaintiffs provided the evidence that sunk their case. The defendant marked that there was damage before the tow but did not take any pictures. Despite protesting that there was no bumper damage before the tow, the plaintiff had a video for an insurance claim for damage to the bumper days before the tow. The judge may have still ruled in the defendant's favor but the plaintiff's evidence was the compelling thing.
Not exactly. She called the collision repair center and that’s when they found the two claims, then dug til she heard they had another video. At least that’s how I understood it.
Oh wow what a coincidence... you called your insurance company to ask a question about a non-existent scratch on your bumper and then two days later the tow truck scratches your bumper
He is suing for the damaged separated bumper!!! NOT the scratch. WTF is so hard to understand. The video clearly showed the huge bumper separation on the right side.
But he lied when she asked if there had been ANY damage to the car BEFORE the tow. Clearly there was. At that point all the other details don't make much difference. Was he suing for only the damage supposedly from the tow? Or all the damage as if it was all from the tow? He's a liar and a lifetime victim.
She didn't let them talk to try to explain what they meant, she just kept interrupting them. It was obvious to me the damage was on the other side of the car, that's why they didn't know what she was talking about. They should have just let her know that it was previously scratched. I don't think they intentionally did anything wrong. A little scratch in the corner of the bumper isn't considered damage. In my opinion, it's just a scratch.
It seems the plaintiff was just mad he got towed and decided to make the tow company pay. But tow companies should take pictures, they probably wouldn't get sued so much.
The pulling of separation on the passenger side of the bumper is the problem. Not the scratch on the driver side!!! They were not lying. They just didn’t know how to properly state their case.
As happens FAR TOO MANY TIMES, MILIAN has a fit and REFUSES to examine the evidence. The plaintiffs are innocent and were treated ABYSMALLY by MILIAN. She got it TOTALLY WRONG!
They didn’t lie if you look at the video, the wife had literally shows on the 15th only the scratch on the other side, but when she walked around, the other side was not damaged then you look at the video after the towing it was damaged the tow truck damaged it it’s just said that judge don’t let people speak. She’s ignorant and she shouldn’t be a judge and she’s worse than Judge Judy.
This is a rare occasion where I disagree with the judge, she didn't watch the complete video. There was damage on the passenger side when it was picked up from the tow yard that was not in the video the plaintiffs handed her....
@@shalemyah6207 Pretty sure the video where the guy blocked a driveway and was towed and then hinted at it was all about racism...Unless he lives in a white neighborhood and is claiming they are coming into a white neighborhood and stealing their property
@12:23 the video clearly shows the front right side bumper still in tact. That was before the tow yard correct? So that means that the tow company is guilty right? Correct me if im wrong.
Maybe she figured JM was going to call someone who could confirm the car was already scratched, so instead of getting caught, she figured she could pull a "Oh, I just remembered, there WAS a scratch!"
Yes indeed. I kind of thought they were lying by the overeacting @5:35 when they were going over the damage at the tow yard. He was so extra and his wife was repeating everything he said for emphasis 🙄 way too extra. But they really messed themselves up by not admitting to the prior claim for scratches Judge asked them several times about prior damage they had to have known they investigate these cases beforehand but its clear to see the bumper was almost detached in the front. I just think she was pissed about the withheld info which madethem seem like liars.
The way he was recording immediately as it came out and all the fussin in the tow shop, I KNEW there was something fishy about this one. You can’t threaten to “make them pay more” as you’re about to try and scam them.
He was trying to explain the bumper by lying about the existing damage? "There's no scratches, that's just the reflection". The moment they were caught lying about the existing damage to get the tow company to pay for that, they couldn't be trusted about anything. They just saw an easy payday. Would've gotten away with it too if it wasn't for the wife.
I love Judge Milian, but she is so annoying sometimes ugh! If you’re going to ask a question, at least give people a chance to answer 🙄🙄🙄. I would love to hear their lies in full please 😂
Plaintiff was scamming hard. He know he damaged that car n knew exactly what to film when they brought the car out. Guarantee he telling everybody the judge is racist and thats why he lost
@@amandadonaldson8748 I noticed the same thing. He was saying oh hell no before we could even see the damage...Most people would be in front of the car filming and making a rotation around the car after it was pulled out. He just happened to be recording at the spot to see the damage? And why would he be recording before seeing it? He could have just as easily made a walk around and then recorded if there was damage. I don't assume damage before it gets there. But I will do a walk around after it is pulled out, even for auto repairs
Apparently everyone missed the fact that the passenger side of the bumper was detached/damaged after the tow, but not in the before video where it only showed light damage to the driver's corner.
She didn't miss that her point was she asked if they made any damage claims before the tow & they said no. They she found they filed a previous damage complaint hurting their credibility
Gotta give the plaintiff credit. He shows up shiny as a penny, but his racist attitude tells it all. He aint go no sense if he doesn't first realize the police first has to acknowledge that he was parked illegally before assiging some nonsense blame on the tow company.
Scammers. I bet you they got towed on purpose so they could blame the damage on someone else and not be responsible for it. They knew what they were doing. Edit: is this Adrians uncle? Blaming the fact that he lost because of his skin color and not because he lied.
The judge missed the damage on the other side when the bumper was hanging on the other side, When they picked up the rental in the video the bumper was not hanging. So the defendent should have paid up.
Moral of the story dont call ur inaurance to inquire about damage to ur vehicle because agenta are taught to put a claim in regardless of ur asking for assistance to repair it. Thats how they get u every time
I don't think the judge listened at all in this case. You can see that front right was damaged and the left had the scratches from before. Seems like they were telling the truth.
It seems like a lot of people are confused about the ruling as it relates to the passenger side of the bumper. The passenger side was clearly damaged. The issue is that, as a result of the plaintiff lying about the damage to the driver side, he was no longer a credible witness as it was clear there was preexisting damage to the bumper from another accident. The plaintiff's only evidence as to the damage to the other side of the bumper was his testimony that it wasn't previously damaged. As a result of the plaintiff lying about the driver side of the bumper, he was no longer able to meet his burden to prove that any damage to the bumper was caused by the tow driver.
The Plaintiffs are too nervous and didn’t explain that the damage they’re speaking of is on the Front Passenger Side not the DRIVER’s SIDE 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️
Nervous? A total thief hiding behind being a victim. He only got nervous when busted. All that puffing about being done wrong. Shameful. Karma she is a comin'.
Agree! The wife's video does show the scratch yes, but the passenger side bumper sure wasn't flopping like it was in the 2nd video, but I would be shocked if any of it was actual racial targeting. Maybe that claim hurt their case where suddenly no one noticed the other side?
Although I agree with the above reply, the way Adrian comments on every video shows some people blame everything on race, even when there's no evidence of bigotry.
In America everything here is about race .. the Land not too long ago belonged to someone else. And it was taken from them by force.. every day on TV and media we are reminded of this Fact
The tow company probably did the damage. The first video from the tow yard definitely shows the bumper separated on the passenger side that isn't in the video from the 15th. JM is fixated in a scratch on the drivers side.
She saw it. She saw the difference judge was in her feelings as usual after she heard the plaintiff at the tow shop and after the call ti the insurance. They should have spoken up, just letting her yell like she's right,
On the passenger side of the first vid, the bumper looks separated, but on the womans vid before the tow it does not appear to be separated. Still its fishy that he didnt mention the dent.
Wow she got this one totally wrong. The video that showed the scratch also shows the passenger side bumper was fine and had a big gap when it came out of towing how did she miss that.
The bumper was not separated from the fender on the 15th the judge blew this one. Look at the video from the 15th the bumper was attached perfectly. On the 17th it was detached
Do people realize how dumb they sound when they constantly repeat themselves? "Look at this!" no less than 14 times. It makes people very hard to take seriously when they don't speak like normal adults, and they repeat themselves like spoiled children.
Am I the only one who noticed the damage the plaintiffs were referring too was on the other side of the car. You can see the panel is separated in the 2nd video, but the judge was so intent on insisting to look at the scratch on the driver side. Either way, they should have disclosed the scratch.
There is a difference between a scratch and a separated bumper. I bet the tow company did damage the bumper but was saved by the plaintiff not mentioning the scratch / video before hand
I don't agree with this verdict. I believe they did damage the bumper. Yes the scratches were already there but that doesn't mean it was in an accident. They were taking document of it when they noticed it.. that's what you do when you have a loner or rental.
The damage on two driver side is pre-existing which seemed what the tow guy put down, but passenger side bumper was pulled off attachment which was not existing before based on video.🤦♂️
I saw the scratch on the driver’s side but saw separation from the main part of the vehicle and the bumper on the passenger side. I don’t believe the plaintiff fully but I feel like it’s partially due to them not being able to explain themselves.
Judge M is SO LOUD & wrong on this case! Lexus (or any other reputable company) would NEVER GIVE SOMEONE A LOANER WITH THE BUMPER DISCONNECTED! That was a scratch that they recorded/reported -how did that translate into the car getting in an accident?!? They were not referring to the bumper damage! I believe the video was to show that the bumper was connected prior to the tow! My coworkers & I actually saw a tow man/company COMPLETELY TEAR THE FRONT BUMPER OFF A NEWER CAR& he didn’t know we saw him! It fell while he was picking it up. He didn’t wait around- he grabbed it & kept going!! It isn’t impossible!! She completely flipped this case & as per the usual over talked the litigants smh. Wow!
I don’t trust that tow company. I think they did damage it. They just got lucky
7 หลายเดือนก่อน +5
Hahahahah. The defendant was in another case on the people’s court where some guy tried to scammed him and judge milian caught the plaintiff in his scam. He definitely has a habit of getting sued by scammers. Second on the people’s court.
JM: “You made me ruuuuuuuuun. We spoke to your apartment building.” Plaintiff: “Miss? The way this one…” JM: “You call me ‘Miss’ right after that?!” *plaintiff flinches* 😂😂😂
There were a lot of lies told. Lies are like many layers of paint in a painting; the picture is much easier to restore if there's only a thin coating of it.
The towing companies should start taking pictures and videos of the vehicles before and after they tow. It's called proof.
I watch a towing company that has their own TH-cam channel. The driver records everything with a camera strapped to his chest plus multiple cameras on his truck. So easy these days!
Take that to its logical conclusion. If they take 10 or 15 pictures per vehicle you have to multiply that by how many vehicles they tow in a month. Where are they going to store all those images or videos just incase they get sued?
@@mexicanspec On their SD card, of course! No big deal at all.
My father in law owned his own towing company for 40 years. Before cell phones he took pictures. Then started with the videos because everyone always wants to blame the tow truck for damage. I hope this guy now has started recording every tow his company makes.
They are usually looking to hook and go quickly to avoid the irate vehicle owners
The scratch was not the problem. The torn bumper was. They should’ve been forthcoming about the preexisting scratch but it still was separate from the bumper damage. I think the video with him threatening to cause financial problems with the tow company sunk him so it made him look like he was setting the tow company up.
Thank you!!!!!!
The problem was there was already damage to the bumper but the plaintiff claims there was not any prior damage. At that point, credibility is the issue.
The video shows the passenger side bumper intact. When the car is driven out of the tow yard the passenger side bumper was pulled away. You can see a gap.
@@Raptor19153 And the plaintiff swears there was no damage to the bumper. When Judge Milan brought up the fact there was an insurance claim to the driver’s side, the story was then it was different damage. Then it is a credibility issue.
@@Raptor19153 The second video didn't show the passenger side bumper but it does show some preexisting damage. The issue is that most of this relied on the plaintiff's testimony about the damage and once he got caught lying, his testimony was no longer credible.
THE DAMAGE WAS DIFFERENT! The whole bumper had been pulled off the vehicle in the video they showed!!
Right! That lil scratch on the video before the tow did not show the bumper pulled off. I hate when the judge get so caught up in feeling “played” they start over looking the evidence
Yeah but the fact that they said earlier that there "wasn't any prior damage" to the car prior to the car being towed, then they gave the judge a video of the car having damage and seemed to have "forgotten" about it (even though they sent in claims to insurance about the prior damage even before the tow thing happened) - that made the plaintiffs look like they were lying, and in a case like this, the judge has to decide who is more culpable, and that tipped the scales over to the defendant's side.
Damage was different but I think the lying then getting caught they actually put a claim for the bumper two days before they claimed the tow damaged the same bumper looks very suspicious. When it’s unclear who was at fault the person who can’t be trusted mostly loses the case when lack of evidence. Yes some damage was on the other side which I think the judge missed but they also were claiming the tow company did the same damage from the 15 cause in that video he’s say oh no oh no taking video of the same damage as if he was shocked to see that scratch he knew was there already. I think that’s what got the judge heated
Don't you just love it when plaintiffs own evidence works against them. Maybe look over your evidence before submitting it as proof?
that plaintiff has real issues.
@@frankgiuliano380 Ben Franklin said that "a lie stands on one leg, the truth on the other."
You and everyone else missed the fact that the passenger side of the bumper was detatched from the car after the tow, but not in the before video.
@@DonziGT230 The second video didn't show the passenger side of the bumper. The issue for the plaintiff is that he was caught lying so he was not a credible witness, and the evidence was his testimony that the tow driver caused the damage versus the tow sheet that marked damage to bumper. Plaintiff was unable to meet his burden because he was not credible.
@@neutralcommenter7800 Wrong, both videos showed the passenger side.
Wow, they sunk their whole case on their own. Lmao! Should have kept their mouth's shut. Dude is a professional victim.
the insurance company is the one who told the judge it was two claims and then they admitted to the video after .
It does seem like hes scabing for extra money.
When I heard the plaintiff in the video describing the damage "Oh my God..." You could feel he was acting out. Plaintiffs did the damage before the tow .
Exactly😂😂😂
It’s funny how in both videos you can hear him repeating “oh hell no…oh hell no”.
Yeah. First he made it clear he is a victim. You nailed it exactly tho. He's video taping as the car comes out and then gets all dramatic saying "Oh my God!. Liars and scammers
Yup he was playing it good on the video, but the judge and everyone that has eyes saw right through the deception.😂
12:45 JMM is BLIND. We're talking about the bumper being PULLED OFF/PULLED FORWARD on the passenger side of the car. That's NOT on the original video on the the video when it came out of the tow yard. That's clearly NOT from being hit but from being pulled by the tow truck. DUH. This has NOTHING to do with the damage on the driver's side at the front headlight. NOTHING. That is separate damage.
Right! Judge saying they lied about being in a accident, ok, so, she's ruled in favor before after someone was caught in a lie
The judge said cops have body cameras because they're tired of being accused of stuff ... Are you sure that's the only reason, judge? 🤔👀
Right
Yea I hated when she said that
Hello EXACTLY!
That's what I'm saying about her continuing to show her true self. The other side of that bumper was almost torn off, and she wants to call a scratch a hit. The absolute madness. She asked if the car was hit. They said no. The scratch may have been there, and they just noticed it.. It's a loaner, duh. She makes judges look bad. Just complete trash.
I would never have her reside over my case.
Technically the scratch is not damage and the video shows the car was damaged on that front passenger side
You are right, @12:23
Agree. The panel gaps in the before video are tight and in the after video, we can see big gaps.
Glad I’m not the only one that saw she missed that and the plaintiff didn’t even point it out. The earlier video before the tow showed the bumper cover attached and not hanging off the clips like the video after the tow.
Exactly...they pulled the bumper out
I think it was because they lied under oath .. the scratch could have caused further damage hence the bumper coming off .. sad case
It was obvious to me that the tow damage was on the passenger side (separated bumper) but only the driver's side was made the focus. Sometimes all the yelling and not listening can confuse and fluster people...., especially in court. No patience here. The judge got stuck on a thought process and that's all she knew. Smh
Victim mentality. I do agree with the judge, the tow company should be taking photos of ll damage.
the plaintiff is a racist1 what don't you all see. listen to the plaintiffs hate!
Yeah...I thought they all did that now...The tow companies here do that...Even if the car is smashed, they still take a picture before they drag it onto the flatbed
It’s funny how different their demeanor are when they are being secretly recorded than when they are in court .
And how quickly it changed once JM asked them to explain the second video!
@@amandadonaldson8748 maybe should’ve let him explain
Well , they are in court!
@amandadonaldson8748 they are not scared. Trust. It's court.
Plaintiffs right, everyone’s racist, everyone’s wrong, everyone’s prejudice and he’s the only one who can do right lol
The plaintiffs provided the evidence that sunk their case. The defendant marked that there was damage before the tow but did not take any pictures. Despite protesting that there was no bumper damage before the tow, the plaintiff had a video for an insurance claim for damage to the bumper days before the tow. The judge may have still ruled in the defendant's favor but the plaintiff's evidence was the compelling thing.
Not exactly. She called the collision repair center and that’s when they found the two claims, then dug til she heard they had another video. At least that’s how I understood it.
Every time someone hollers RACE CARD it hurts REAL racial injustices!!!
Plaintiffs should have gone to Judge Mathis... Who would have reached the same conclusion as Judge Milian 😂
THEN WHAT?!?
The video they provided actually proved their case, but the judge was looking at the wrong side of the bumper.
@@mexicanspec LOL not hardly, they lied
Oh wow what a coincidence... you called your insurance company to ask a question about a non-existent scratch on your bumper and then two days later the tow truck scratches your bumper
If you did not see the difference you are a idiot... the bumper was detached
He is suing for the damaged separated bumper!!! NOT the scratch. WTF is so hard to understand. The video clearly showed the huge bumper separation on the right side.
Absolutely right!!!
Exactly. They just didn’t know how to explain it I guess cuz she starting yelling
But he lied when she asked if there had been ANY damage to the car BEFORE the tow. Clearly there was. At that point all the other details don't make much difference. Was he suing for only the damage supposedly from the tow? Or all the damage as if it was all from the tow? He's a liar and a lifetime victim.
LOL they might have won if they didn't lie
Exactly
She didn't let them talk to try to explain what they meant, she just kept interrupting them. It was obvious to me the damage was on the other side of the car, that's why they didn't know what she was talking about. They should have just let her know that it was previously scratched. I don't think they intentionally did anything wrong. A little scratch in the corner of the bumper isn't considered damage. In my opinion, it's just a scratch.
Totally agree. Some people don't consider scratches as damage to a car. I would have said no also. They totally got railroad in this case.
A scratch is damage. It impairs the value of a vehicle to be scratched up, thus its damage.
It seems the plaintiff was just mad he got towed and decided to make the tow company pay. But tow companies should take pictures, they probably wouldn't get sued so much.
The pulling of separation on the passenger side of the bumper is the problem. Not the scratch on the driver side!!! They were not lying. They just didn’t know how to properly state their case.
Exactly!!!
None of that matters. She asked if there had been ANY damage before the tow. "Absolutely not!" said the plaintiff. He lied.
That’s his problem
Some people don't consider scratches as damages.. js
The plaintiff put the "E" in entitled. This one is pure comedy.
As happens FAR TOO MANY TIMES, MILIAN has a fit and REFUSES to examine the evidence. The plaintiffs are innocent and were treated ABYSMALLY by MILIAN. She got it TOTALLY WRONG!
What is wrong with people? They lie in court, then get outraged over the verdict!
They didn’t lie if you look at the video, the wife had literally shows on the 15th only the scratch on the other side, but when she walked around, the other side was not damaged then you look at the video after the towing it was damaged the tow truck damaged it it’s just said that judge don’t let people speak. She’s ignorant and she shouldn’t be a judge and she’s worse than Judge Judy.
Yup when you lie you lose the case, 😂😂
This is a rare occasion where I disagree with the judge, she didn't watch the complete video. There was damage on the passenger side when it was picked up from the tow yard that was not in the video the plaintiffs handed her....
I absolutely adore all the legal scholars crawling out of the woodwork to comment on these cases. People have zero knowledge and a lot of opinions.
You can tell he pull out his race card whenever he get a chance 🤦🏽♀️😂
and plays it from the bottom of the deck
Race card? There's no such thing. You as a black person commenting is sick and sad. Self hate is real.
I just want others to know we all are not like this weak minded individual pulling the race card. This was obviously a scheme.
Sis... my eyes rolled to the back of my head so hard, I'm still trying to focus 😅😅
Big time😂
He parked blocking someone and pulls the race card? How dare he be so arrogant.
What video did you watch
@@shalemyah6207 this one. Where the guy blocked someone and pulled the race card.
@@shalemyah6207 Pretty sure the video where the guy blocked a driveway and was towed and then hinted at it was all about racism...Unless he lives in a white neighborhood and is claiming they are coming into a white neighborhood and stealing their property
The front right was damaged not the left scratch
CORRECT.
JM got this wrong!!!!!! The bumper falling off has nothing to do with that scratch! 🤦 Really Judge 🙄
Exactly! The bumper is falling off on the passenger side and the video shows the driver side. Their own video from the 15th shows the bumper intact
@@tamikalittle6910 riiiiight!
@12:23 the video clearly shows the front right side bumper still in tact. That was before the tow yard correct? So that means that the tow company is guilty right? Correct me if im wrong.
I don’t believe a word the plaintiff said. People like him never want to be held accountable.
Don't block py driveway
😂 why would the wife have even brought that up?
😂😂lol I was thinking the same thing
@@ashamason9003😂
Smh she should’ve stayed quiet
Stupid.
Maybe she figured JM was going to call someone who could confirm the car was already scratched, so instead of getting caught, she figured she could pull a "Oh, I just remembered, there WAS a scratch!"
This guy's insurance rates are going to go through the roof. Two claims.
WRONG.
Yes indeed. I kind of thought they were lying by the overeacting @5:35 when they were going over the damage at the tow yard. He was so extra and his wife was repeating everything he said for emphasis 🙄 way too extra. But they really messed themselves up by not admitting to the prior claim for scratches Judge asked them several times about prior damage they had to have known they investigate these cases beforehand but its clear to see the bumper was almost detached in the front. I just think she was pissed about the withheld info which madethem seem like liars.
Plaintiff: 'y'all always tryna still from black community '
Also Plaintiff: Tries to steal from tow company
The way he was recording immediately as it came out and all the fussin in the tow shop, I KNEW there was something fishy about this one. You can’t threaten to “make them pay more” as you’re about to try and scam them.
The issue was the bumper was separating from the car, not the scratch. That's what he was trying to explain.
I agree and on the PASSENGER side but he was too nervous and slow talking to explain that to her.
She was too busy yelling trying to be right and not listening, it made me so angry lol
He was trying to explain the bumper by lying about the existing damage? "There's no scratches, that's just the reflection". The moment they were caught lying about the existing damage to get the tow company to pay for that, they couldn't be trusted about anything. They just saw an easy payday. Would've gotten away with it too if it wasn't for the wife.
Exactly! And the comments here are so stupid!!!!
@@Fribee83 No, it's has nothing to do with that. You're just thick.
I love Judge Milian, but she is so annoying sometimes ugh! If you’re going to ask a question, at least give people a chance to answer 🙄🙄🙄. I would love to hear their lies in full please 😂
Looked like the plaintiff was winning until they went to recess and the judge realized there were two claims.
and then Milian assumed they were liars instead of looking at the evidence. She does this far too often.
On the first video the bumper has a big gap from the fender on the second video it doesn't.
The announcer enjoyed that harde har har 😂
Plaintiff's voice amnoys me
Plaintiff was scamming hard. He know he damaged that car n knew exactly what to film when they brought the car out. Guarantee he telling everybody the judge is racist and thats why he lost
Yeah he was already yelling about damage before they got the car pulled into view.
@@amandadonaldson8748 I noticed the same thing. He was saying oh hell no before we could even see the damage...Most people would be in front of the car filming and making a rotation around the car after it was pulled out. He just happened to be recording at the spot to see the damage? And why would he be recording before seeing it? He could have just as easily made a walk around and then recorded if there was damage. I don't assume damage before it gets there. But I will do a walk around after it is pulled out, even for auto repairs
Scamming that man is a millionaire so why would he scam anyone that’s crazy
Surprised she didn't say your phone is not only for dirty pictures
I love how Douglas was there to make sure she didn't fall again! Good job, Douglas!
The judge is clearly not listening he was right now she goes off ranting and raving with the proof in front of her.
She talk so much she don’t listen! She’ll send an innocent person to jail QUICK.
Something needs to humble this judge
@stephsimone1953 oh plz this dude is another scammer. He looks Nigerian.
Dishonest people those plaintiffs were.
Not a great Verdict/ the panel spacing was obvious
@@scottbrewer1408 not really the guy looks like a scammer.
Funny he didn’t yell that judge was racist
This should've been a miss trial.
@@thankthelord4536 LOL not hardly
Apparently everyone missed the fact that the passenger side of the bumper was detached/damaged after the tow, but not in the before video where it only showed light damage to the driver's corner.
How she missed the bumper being separated, I don’t know. 💀💀💀
She didn't miss that her point was she asked if they made any damage claims before the tow & they said no. They she found they filed a previous damage complaint hurting their credibility
Gotta give the plaintiff credit. He shows up shiny as a penny, but his racist attitude tells it all. He aint go no sense if he doesn't first realize the police first has to acknowledge that he was parked illegally before assiging some nonsense blame on the tow company.
Hearing him tell the judge “I see reflections” when looking at the video on the monitor cracked me up. 100% proof and they still are in denial.
You got caught red handed my boy!! 😂😂😂
Scammers. I bet you they got towed on purpose so they could blame the damage on someone else and not be responsible for it. They knew what they were doing.
Edit: is this Adrians uncle? Blaming the fact that he lost because of his skin color and not because he lied.
I didn't think of that, but you are probably right!
It probably is and you just wrote what I was thinking , 😂
The judge missed the damage on the other side when the bumper was hanging on the other side, When they picked up the rental in the video the bumper was not hanging. So the defendent should have paid up.
Moral of the story dont call ur inaurance to inquire about damage to ur vehicle because agenta are taught to put a claim in regardless of ur asking for assistance to repair it. Thats how they get u every time
She wasn’t right
Yes she was, they shouldn't have lied
@@ericsneary5430 WRONG. They were suing for the separated bumper.
Definitely wasn't right at all
@@stratfordbabyhow is it wrong, they lied about no damage when it had damage. It ruins their credibility
I don't think the judge listened at all in this case. You can see that front right was damaged and the left had the scratches from before. Seems like they were telling the truth.
It seems like a lot of people are confused about the ruling as it relates to the passenger side of the bumper. The passenger side was clearly damaged. The issue is that, as a result of the plaintiff lying about the damage to the driver side, he was no longer a credible witness as it was clear there was preexisting damage to the bumper from another accident. The plaintiff's only evidence as to the damage to the other side of the bumper was his testimony that it wasn't previously damaged. As a result of the plaintiff lying about the driver side of the bumper, he was no longer able to meet his burden to prove that any damage to the bumper was caused by the tow driver.
The Plaintiffs are too nervous and didn’t explain that the damage they’re speaking of is on the Front Passenger Side not the DRIVER’s SIDE 🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤷🏽♀️
The judge be too hyped thinking she has all.the answers
Nervous? A total thief hiding behind being a victim. He only got nervous when busted. All that puffing about being done wrong. Shameful. Karma she is a comin'.
@@arianegabrielleexactly! Nervous my a$$$$$ !! Applauding your logical reply !!
Exactly!!! Things were moving too fast for them.
Agree! The wife's video does show the scratch yes, but the passenger side bumper sure wasn't flopping like it was in the 2nd video, but I would be shocked if any of it was actual racial targeting. Maybe that claim hurt their case where suddenly no one noticed the other side?
seeing everything through a racial lens is a sad way to live
everything is racial.
Living it every day is something that is real out here.
Although I agree with the above reply, the way Adrian comments on every video shows some people blame everything on race, even when there's no evidence of bigotry.
In America everything here is about race .. the Land not too long ago belonged to someone else. And it was taken from them by force.. every day on TV and media we are reminded of this Fact
@@shalemyah6207 thank you!
You can tell by the way he was talking when the car came out lol. He knew it was already damaged
The tow company probably did the damage. The first video from the tow yard definitely shows the bumper separated on the passenger side that isn't in the video from the 15th. JM is fixated in a scratch on the drivers side.
This man damaged the car then parked it where he knew it would be towed so he could say they damaged it! Obviously lol
That race card didn’t work this time!!!
She is not being fair at all. I think that's on purpose. She is dead wrong
Exactly
She is definitely very bias when she wants to be!
Her voice annoying af I can’t even watch and it’s crazy bc I binge watch ppls court .. this episode she seems a lot more hostile and snappy
Racism
She is a fool how did she not see the bumper was detected
He reminds me of the actor Bill Duke
Because he know he f***ed up? lol yeah he looks like Bill Duke, too
@@tonecapone2644 😆 🤣 😂
There was damage on the passenger side! How the hell did JM not see it?! And the plaintiffs didn’t speak up enough
She saw it. She saw the difference judge was in her feelings as usual after she heard the plaintiff at the tow shop and after the call ti the insurance. They should have spoken up, just letting her yell like she's right,
Lie about the damage... Lie about the illegal parking... Then cry that the judge is unfair 😂
Hooray! The scammers got caught and still think they will earn a bonanza!!!
On the passenger side of the first vid, the bumper looks separated, but on the womans vid before the tow it does not appear to be separated. Still its fishy that he didnt mention the dent.
The tow company damaged that bumper! Periodttttt!!
Wow she got this one totally wrong. The video that showed the scratch also shows the passenger side bumper was fine and had a big gap when it came out of towing how did she miss that.
How did they screw themselves 😂😂😂
The bumper was not separated from the fender on the 15th the judge blew this one. Look at the video from the 15th the bumper was attached perfectly. On the 17th it was detached
No one can speak once the judge starts performing! Im done watching her 😂🤣
The Plaintiff's are Toolboxes.
Do people realize how dumb they sound when they constantly repeat themselves? "Look at this!" no less than 14 times. It makes people very hard to take seriously when they don't speak like normal adults, and they repeat themselves like spoiled children.
with the wife echoing it...sounded ridiculous and put everyone on high alert that they were pulling a scam
Am I the only one who noticed the damage the plaintiffs were referring too was on the other side of the car. You can see the panel is separated in the 2nd video, but the judge was so intent on insisting to look at the scratch on the driver side. Either way, they should have disclosed the scratch.
There is a difference between a scratch and a separated bumper. I bet the tow company did damage the bumper but was saved by the plaintiff not mentioning the scratch / video before hand
JM would have me so f’d up talking like that. She confuses her litigants for her children.
Why? Because someone came in lying and trying to play the race card.
LOL not hardly
They lied!
The damage that they were claiming was on the other side. It wasn't even the damage that she was pointing out
That's not even the same side of the damage on the videos
I don’t like the way she’s not allowing them to answer her questions. Nasty attitude
I don't agree with this verdict. I believe they did damage the bumper. Yes the scratches were already there but that doesn't mean it was in an accident. They were taking document of it when they noticed it.. that's what you do when you have a loner or rental.
The damage on two driver side is pre-existing which seemed what the tow guy put down, but passenger side bumper was pulled off attachment which was not existing before based on video.🤦♂️
Plaintiffs don’t like Trump & tried to scam the tow company… USUAL SUSPECTS
I saw the scratch on the driver’s side but saw separation from the main part of the vehicle and the bumper on the passenger side. I don’t believe the plaintiff fully but I feel like it’s partially due to them not being able to explain themselves.
Adrian incoming for this one 😂✈ 💣
Lol!!!!
😂😂😂
Been trying to find his comment lol
Dude I've been LOOKING
The defendant has been in another case on this show, the one with the Nigerian guy who called Judge Milian “Miss” and made her run. 😂😂😂
I thought he was on the show before.
That’s not the damage they were referring to. If you look at the front bumper it looks loose.
Judge M is SO LOUD & wrong on this case! Lexus (or any other reputable company) would NEVER GIVE SOMEONE A LOANER WITH THE BUMPER DISCONNECTED! That was a scratch that they recorded/reported -how did that translate into the car getting in an accident?!? They were not referring to the bumper damage! I believe the video was to show that the bumper was connected prior to the tow! My coworkers & I actually saw a tow man/company COMPLETELY TEAR THE FRONT BUMPER OFF A NEWER CAR& he didn’t know we saw him! It fell while he was picking it up. He didn’t wait around- he grabbed it & kept going!! It isn’t impossible!! She completely flipped this case & as per the usual over talked the litigants smh. Wow!
Maybe those scamming plaintiffs shouldn't have lied
They always have to use color as the problem
Racist.
@sdays59 Yes the plaintiff seems to be. It's sad. Hopefully someday he'll come around and stop seeing color.
I don’t trust that tow company. I think they did damage it. They just got lucky
Hahahahah. The defendant was in another case on the people’s court where some guy tried to scammed him and judge milian caught the plaintiff in his scam. He definitely has a habit of getting sued by scammers. Second on the people’s court.
JM: “You made me ruuuuuuuuun. We spoke to your apartment building.”
Plaintiff: “Miss? The way this one…”
JM: “You call me ‘Miss’ right after that?!” *plaintiff flinches* 😂😂😂
Yep and they damaged that bumper!
There were a lot of lies told. Lies are like many layers of paint in a painting; the picture is much easier to restore if there's only a thin coating of it.
In the thumbnail you cannot tell me the plaintiff does not look like Master p if he was a regular person
Omg I was looking for this comment. Looks exactly like him
Weren’t they suing for the torn bumper ? Comparing the two videos didn’t clarify this or did I miss something ?