Just bet their top score to show because of very high in the money%. Their top win bets end up being over bet with a negative ROI, but as show bets they have a positive ROI.
You should have a calibration method for each regression of point figures. Otherwise, your guesstimate of speed figures will be beyond of upcoming reality.
Speed figures are incomplete power ratings. I actually published my power rating method free through links in my videos. SPY options are the much better gambling game anyway.
How many derby winners your system pick, since inception, for you to be making such bold claims? Why not say par instead of class, which makes more sense in horse racing language
Just bet their top score to show because of very high in the money%. Their top win bets end up being over bet with a negative ROI, but as show bets they have a positive ROI.
Agree with almost everything you said about run ups
Great job Dave! Enjoy your explanation of the figures a lot.
Interesting speed rating formula, I will incorporate this into my speed rating program
and keep it as a benchmark as it is soundly based.
garyoptica hhohhc zccbfex gfuuii9gg
.
Your volume is quiet then it booms.
You should have a calibration method for each regression of point figures. Otherwise, your guesstimate of speed figures will be beyond of upcoming reality.
David Siegel is my hero. Nuff said.
-how do you use purse to determine speed? That’s so vague!
Speed figures are incomplete power ratings. I actually published my power rating method free through links in my videos. SPY options are the much better gambling game anyway.
But you haven’t dealt with the rail out?
But why are you illustrating cheat horses rather than quality runners that would make for clearer understanding?
What is the win percentage for thoroughbreds with the highest speed figure in their last outing?
How many derby winners your system pick, since inception, for you to be making such bold claims? Why not say par instead of class, which makes more sense in horse racing language