Samsung is more consistent in UW and TP mode and the sorcery with the zoom is unmatched.On the other hnand Sony seems to render better the colors with the main lens and it overexpose less than in the past.Sony has a good setup but not the best but it can do more with the adjustments .I believe that without a tripod the sony zoom camera will end in softness and blur but i also believe the macro shots on xperia are better than samsung.But how is the audio jack on sony is it considerably better than one mark v or is it the same jack that is just market trick without a real use.
Man, I love the direction Sony is heading( when it comes to pictures, not videos)! It takes better pictures than the predecessor, and even the zoom system is better, initially I thought that small 12 MP resolution will not be enough to do its job, but it does man! 🙂
Video for Samsung, photos on the main was for Sony. Buth them both struggle with right light and colors. Sony need to after correct it+s over exposed photos, and Samsung need sometimes more light or less light. None of them impressed in photos.
@@PeterEk31 Samsung had better HDR in pics hence they looked more balanced in the bright and dark areas of a picture. I'd like to see them compared in manual mode and without using AI.
And the color on Sony video was off, Samsung had better video. For photos both was not that good. Sony to bright, and Samsung sometimes to dark or to bright.
am i the only one who thinks xperia video is way better? the colors look more cinematic and the softness actually gives the video depth. like i can actually see the quality of air on the xperia unlike the samsung
Samsung is good but for real Camera Sony Win Samsung puts too much AI into its cameras, which is good for most consumers but for camera enthusiasts things like AI are annoying
The main camera of the Sony is good, really good. However, its ultra-wide and tele sensors are holding it back. If I am correct Sony have been using the same sensors for their two secondary lens for many generations,. In photos those drawbacks can still be "covered up" by imagine processing, but in video they are definitely showing their limitations. I have the Xperia 1 ii and looking to upgrade to the iv, but the two secondary lens are kind of disappointing for the amount of money they are asking for. The Samsung is not perfect, and I really don't like the colour and over sharpening of the Samsung, but it still seems like you are getting more phone for the money, especially when considering other elements of the phone such as the longer software support and better screen.
The best way to describe this is Analog vs Digital. Sony has a higher dynamic range but distorted colors at higher distance zooms, whereas the Samsung is much clearer and sharper due to a lower exposure setting at default, and it suffers because of that in the colors it can capture. This is most clear in the brighter colors but especially in the shade in the video and the picture of the trees. I think as the cameras progress, our eyes need to relearn what the images we are seeing actually mean because historically we have never even seen handheld cameras this well made.
I was rooting for the Xperia, but I think overall the Galaxy was the winner. I don't like how the Xperia over brightened shots. The audio from the video on the Galaxy was decidedly better than the Xperia.
I'd say samung photos are more ready to go..The balanced HDR & contrast is pretty nice even if crushed blacks indoor & slightly brightened outdoor, but then exact opposite for video. Sony better sensors more natural detailed & balanced & Sammy crushed blacks & over sharpened video.. Still not horrible but Sony is so clean video. For point and shoot Sammy easy win for photo & sony for video. If use pro mode Im sure Sony can win both categories but it depends since Sammy pro mode is decent too...so it would come do to person skills & preference of the user. Indoor photos sammy way more balanced. Good job underexposing the person to keep backround highlights in check..Can always easily add bit of brightness to person after. You cant bring back overexposed lost details by Sony. Same for zoom photos. Sammy contrast heavy & Sony slightly overexposed. Heavy sharpening definitely overkill on sammy overall is biggest downside.
Overall, Sony's photos are very natural and attractive, while Samsung's photos look like they've been tinkered with by the AI, and while they may catch your eye at first glance, they'll soon tire your eyes and you'll get bored of them.
Samsung is more versatile, hence better for me. When it comes to video Samsung was better. When it comes to photography, it went back and forth. Outdoors with the main camera, I liked the Sony's photos better, but indoors the Samsung looked better. Portraits the Samsung was too dark on the face, while the Sony blew out the entire background and made his ears glow red so both need to be corrected. Regardless, I'll have to wait another year before I buy a new phone, because none of them have improved enough from my Samsung S22 Ultra to be worth spending that much money on, something I can use for the holidays instead. Sony needs to improve its mediocre zoom camera and wide angle and its selfie camera for me to buy them. Sony and the iPhone still have problems with lens flairs where they are worse than Samsung which does not boast of zeiss coating but still has less problems with it than Sony. Either way, Sony has improved significantly from where they were just a few years ago. But still they are too weak when it comes to the cameras other than their main one.
Best manual settings is sony xperia Best over all is s24 ultra but if you know how to use pro mode or play little with expoture you can get vay better photos than this
for sound what I noticed is important to turn on the function to use all microphones. By default there is voice priority ON. For quality, in general I'm kind of disappointed. Video in many occasion is worse than on my previous 1 V.
Today I got 1 VI, after playing a whole day with it, I think I will return and go for Ultra. I have strong feeling that Mark V did better job in camera department.
I just got my 1 VI a few days ago. I love the phone now. Short and sweet: With the 1 VI, it is an improvement camera wise over the 1 V for all but the absolute most experienced photographers who want full manual control over their videos. The phone has to be looked at holistically. The battery endurance, build quality, the sound of the speakers and the headphones, the clean software experience, form factor (no huge, bulging camera islands), and the very natural photography make this phone VERY unique in the current smartphone space. Tl;Dr The photos are hit and miss...to be honest the more I use it the better I am able to make the phone take great photos and video. The telemacro is amazing, as is 2x mode (way better than 1x for some reason), as is 48MP mode. Despite the consolidation of camera apps, it still requires you know what you're doing to get the best out of it. Samsung and others like Vivo and Xiaomi are flat out better point and shoot cameras, especially for those who are social media oriented. The photos on the Sony are way more naturally balanced in appearance and just like with food, most people prefer the taste of artificial things, high amounts of salt, sugar, fat, or msg. The Mark series isn't the best phone for the average person. I had the same experience when I first got my Nightforce NXS scope. I was like "what did I pay for? I had scopes for 1/3 the price that were as good or better in certain ways." Once I got it set up and learned all the nuances and played with it in different environments, I learned exactly what I paid $1600 for. Now, I wouldn't trade this thing for 3 copies of any of my other scopes.
Skin tone and natural details are wow on Xperia 🎉
Sony is more natural ✔️✔️✔️
Did you shoot this video ? Or did you there when the video was shoot ?
@@rusirubatuwatta8731do you not see how lighting is in real life?
@@rusirubatuwatta8731🤦
I know and i can safly say samsung is better @@fish6941
Samsung is more consistent in UW and TP mode and the sorcery with the zoom is unmatched.On the other hnand Sony seems to render better the colors with the main lens and it overexpose less than in the past.Sony has a good setup but not the best but it can do more with the adjustments .I believe that without a tripod the sony zoom camera will end in softness and blur but i also believe the macro shots on xperia are better than samsung.But how is the audio jack on sony is it considerably better than one mark v or is it the same jack that is just market trick without a real use.
Photo, SONY is the best 📸
The Sony looked more natural in my opinion. I just wish we could get this phone in the states.
Man, I love the direction Sony is heading( when it comes to pictures, not videos)! It takes better pictures than the predecessor, and even the zoom system is better, initially I thought that small 12 MP resolution will not be enough to do its job, but it does man! 🙂
Wow Sony way more better well balanced well natural colour and looks love it so much!!!
Video for Samsung, photos on the main was for Sony. Buth them both struggle with right light and colors. Sony need to after correct it+s over exposed photos, and Samsung need sometimes more light or less light. None of them impressed in photos.
@@PeterEk31 Samsung had better HDR in pics hence they looked more balanced in the bright and dark areas of a picture. I'd like to see them compared in manual mode and without using AI.
Sony Xperia best picture clarity and India mobile pls 🙏 coming back.
Sony made the Samsung's video look even more over sharpened.
And the color on Sony video was off, Samsung had better video. For photos both was not that good. Sony to bright, and Samsung sometimes to dark or to bright.
In portrait mode ultra maintain back ground light but underexpose face while Sony overexpose background but good light on the face
am i the only one who thinks xperia video is way better? the colors look more cinematic and the softness actually gives the video depth. like i can actually see the quality of air on the xperia unlike the samsung
Samsung is good but for real Camera Sony Win
Samsung puts too much AI into its cameras, which is good for most consumers but for camera enthusiasts things like AI are annoying
You missed Most important Macro shoots and low light
Yes in deed.
Sony experia-Light Balance dynamic
Samsung-Clear Audio,Best zoom
Sony, the best special for music.
Why are the portrait shots not the same? It's off putting.
A new challenger has entered: Honor Magic6 Pro
The main camera of the Sony is good, really good. However, its ultra-wide and tele sensors are holding it back. If I am correct Sony have been using the same sensors for their two secondary lens for many generations,. In photos those drawbacks can still be "covered up" by imagine processing, but in video they are definitely showing their limitations. I have the Xperia 1 ii and looking to upgrade to the iv, but the two secondary lens are kind of disappointing for the amount of money they are asking for. The Samsung is not perfect, and I really don't like the colour and over sharpening of the Samsung, but it still seems like you are getting more phone for the money, especially when considering other elements of the phone such as the longer software support and better screen.
The best way to describe this is Analog vs Digital. Sony has a higher dynamic range but distorted colors at higher distance zooms, whereas the Samsung is much clearer and sharper due to a lower exposure setting at default, and it suffers because of that in the colors it can capture. This is most clear in the brighter colors but especially in the shade in the video and the picture of the trees. I think as the cameras progress, our eyes need to relearn what the images we are seeing actually mean because historically we have never even seen handheld cameras this well made.
Samsung wins the video test.
Sony wins the photo test.
Both are good but Sony is better for pro features.
King: Sony ❤
Sony is clear winner in all aspects of photography like sharpness, zooming clarity, as far as my knowledge. 👌👌👌
Sony is the winner
Nice video waiting for detailed camera comparison
I was rooting for the Xperia, but I think overall the Galaxy was the winner. I don't like how the Xperia over brightened shots. The audio from the video on the Galaxy was decidedly better than the Xperia.
Xperia best
Sony❤❤ king is always king 👍💪
👑SONY 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
I'd say samung photos are more ready to go..The balanced HDR & contrast is pretty nice even if crushed blacks indoor & slightly brightened outdoor, but then exact opposite for video. Sony better sensors more natural detailed & balanced & Sammy crushed blacks & over sharpened video.. Still not horrible but Sony is so clean video. For point and shoot Sammy easy win for photo & sony for video. If use pro mode Im sure Sony can win both categories but it depends since Sammy pro mode is decent too...so it would come do to person skills & preference of the user.
Indoor photos sammy way more balanced. Good job underexposing the person to keep backround highlights in check..Can always easily add bit of brightness to person after. You cant bring back overexposed lost details by Sony. Same for zoom photos. Sammy contrast heavy & Sony slightly overexposed. Heavy sharpening definitely overkill on sammy overall is biggest downside.
Overall, Sony's photos are very natural and attractive, while Samsung's photos look like they've been tinkered with by the AI, and while they may catch your eye at first glance, they'll soon tire your eyes and you'll get bored of them.
Wow such an underrated, well judged comment ❤
Battery drain test please bro?
📸Only Sony
Samsung still better imo
Sony the best
Xperia 1 VI wipes the floor with the Korean "star".
Sony 👑♥️🤗
Its true sony more realatic and natural pictures
đại đế Sony đã trở lại vn 😅😅
Samsung varieble apreture plus optical persicope zoom kills evrything
Sony for sure . I am coming to buy you sony😅❤
Sony is best
Not in 2024.
Sony 👌👌
Sony Sony
Xperia❤❤❤
Sony N1
s24 ultra is better in overall
Sony❤❤
Samsung is more versatile, hence better for me. When it comes to video Samsung was better. When it comes to photography, it went back and forth. Outdoors with the main camera, I liked the Sony's photos better, but indoors the Samsung looked better. Portraits the Samsung was too dark on the face, while the Sony blew out the entire background and made his ears glow red so both need to be corrected. Regardless, I'll have to wait another year before I buy a new phone, because none of them have improved enough from my Samsung S22 Ultra to be worth spending that much money on, something I can use for the holidays instead. Sony needs to improve its mediocre zoom camera and wide angle and its selfie camera for me to buy them. Sony and the iPhone still have problems with lens flairs where they are worse than Samsung which does not boast of zeiss coating but still has less problems with it than Sony. Either way, Sony has improved significantly from where they were just a few years ago. But still they are too weak when it comes to the cameras other than their main one.
Best manual settings is sony xperia
Best over all is s24 ultra but if you know how to use pro mode or play little with expoture you can get vay better photos than this
Fanboys said sony is best.. But samsung is better here and sony is no more power to beat current android flagships.
*has
You must be fan at parties 😂
20 years update ONLY SONY -------
sony❤
Samsung👌
Yeah, Samsung stinks.
Samsung best
Fake sony have zoom smooth
samsung best
Sony ultra wide photo/video doesn't feel flagship.
Also sound recording kinda poor.
for sound what I noticed is important to turn on the function to use all microphones. By default there is voice priority ON. For quality, in general I'm kind of disappointed. Video in many occasion is worse than on my previous 1 V.
samsung anyday
Today I got 1 VI, after playing a whole day with it, I think I will return and go for Ultra. I have strong feeling that Mark V did better job in camera department.
I just got my 1 VI a few days ago. I love the phone now.
Short and sweet:
With the 1 VI, it is an improvement camera wise over the 1 V for all but the absolute most experienced photographers who want full manual control over their videos. The phone has to be looked at holistically. The battery endurance, build quality, the sound of the speakers and the headphones, the clean software experience, form factor (no huge, bulging camera islands), and the very natural photography make this phone VERY unique in the current smartphone space.
Tl;Dr
The photos are hit and miss...to be honest the more I use it the better I am able to make the phone take great photos and video. The telemacro is amazing, as is 2x mode (way better than 1x for some reason), as is 48MP mode.
Despite the consolidation of camera apps, it still requires you know what you're doing to get the best out of it. Samsung and others like Vivo and Xiaomi are flat out better point and shoot cameras, especially for those who are social media oriented.
The photos on the Sony are way more naturally balanced in appearance and just like with food, most people prefer the taste of artificial things, high amounts of salt, sugar, fat, or msg. The Mark series isn't the best phone for the average person.
I had the same experience when I first got my Nightforce NXS scope. I was like "what did I pay for? I had scopes for 1/3 the price that were as good or better in certain ways." Once I got it set up and learned all the nuances and played with it in different environments, I learned exactly what I paid $1600 for. Now, I wouldn't trade this thing for 3 copies of any of my other scopes.
I have both, the Mk VI is a real step up, especially in the telephoto department. I managed to get pretty nice pictures with it
@@lionelb8227 will try to test it more :) however phone is not only a camera :)
Ultra 👊
Ultra crap. 😂
Galaxy!
Sony N1