It is better to think of the ‘Eureka’ feeling as understanding or a profound experiential connection rather than truth. The latter is a common mistake & conflation.
The topic is interesting, but the presenters apparent lack of preparation gives me doubt in the thoroughness of their understanding of the topic. After a few times where she was uncertain of some things, I couldn't continue watching despite an active interest in this topic. Maybe it's cos I got a shitty sleep last night but idk.
It was a bit disjointed, I’d agree. The meta-cognitive aspect could have been WAY better outlined and explained. Question 3 is a very important question, and her saying it’s philosophical was too superficial.
If I remember correctly this was part of a student congress, meaning all speakers where students themselves and not experts or professionals. So there's room for her to learn and improve as a speaker and researcher :))
It is better to think of the ‘Eureka’ feeling as understanding or a profound experiential connection rather than truth. The latter is a common mistake & conflation.
That's a really good point; it's about a new crystallization of pre-existing elements rather than a whole new 'thing'.
The topic is interesting, but the presenters apparent lack of preparation gives me doubt in the thoroughness of their understanding of the topic. After a few times where she was uncertain of some things, I couldn't continue watching despite an active interest in this topic. Maybe it's cos I got a shitty sleep last night but idk.
It was a bit disjointed, I’d agree. The meta-cognitive aspect could have been WAY better outlined and explained. Question 3 is a very important question, and her saying it’s philosophical was too superficial.
If I remember correctly this was part of a student congress, meaning all speakers where students themselves and not experts or professionals. So there's room for her to learn and improve as a speaker and researcher :))