@365MCS, I love the storage cost impact (and specifically the reporting) to help inform decision making and the importance of improving Data, Information & Knowledge Management (full lifecycle), and the retention and final disposition of information, and the long term preservation of information of permanent value. Keep improving the service and the capabilities!
@365MCS, great idea to include sentiment data as part of Copilot and data export for analysis. Please add to the backlog! ;-)) e.g. sentiments captured in meeting transcripts, etc.
@365MCS, will Outlook support a process/wizard that supports user qualification of duplicate contacts, particularly where fuzzy? e.g. what if you have 2 or more contacts that share the same first and last name but have different email addresses. It may be that some contacts are indeed the same but having multiple emails addresses or even phone numbers.
@365MCS, can the dynamic watermarking be enforced and to display the highest aggregate security classification of all content presented both onscreen and in printout, and can this support standard and customised Confidentiality labels, and can the placement of the watermark also be enforced in a standards-based specific location? e.g. a PPT slide has a label of Unclassified/Public but an embedded Image has a label of Secret/Confidential, then the slide watermark displays Secret/Confidential instead, and in a specific location established by policy and standards.
Has anyone found a way to determine how often the files of an unlicensed user are being accessed (since they became unlicensed or left)? It’s quite challenging to estimate the cost of archiving without knowing how frequently active users might restore data from inactive users. The new report shows how many users and how many GB/TB, but not clue on the activity
SPO storage is significantly more expensive than Archive storage (approximately four times more). Therefore, unless your users need frequent access to the data-in which case they should simply copy or move the data-opting for Archive storage is a more cost-effective solution (if you don't or can't delete the data after X days)
@@thormitron While that is true if you are comparing the costs when purchasing more, SPO storage is provided for each user and therefore isn't an additional cost beyond what is already being paid, as I am sure you understand. This of course changes if you have to purchase MORE SPO storage if your tenant is out. But if orgs have excess SPO storage - amounts are pooled for all users, then it wouldn't cost additional money to use that SPO storage.
@365MCS, I love the storage cost impact (and specifically the reporting) to help inform decision making and the importance of improving Data, Information & Knowledge Management (full lifecycle), and the retention and final disposition of information, and the long term preservation of information of permanent value. Keep improving the service and the capabilities!
@365MCS, great idea to include sentiment data as part of Copilot and data export for analysis. Please add to the backlog! ;-)) e.g. sentiments captured in meeting transcripts, etc.
These guys know what they are talking about.
@365MCS, will Outlook support a process/wizard that supports user qualification of duplicate contacts, particularly where fuzzy? e.g. what if you have 2 or more contacts that share the same first and last name but have different email addresses. It may be that some contacts are indeed the same but having multiple emails addresses or even phone numbers.
@365MCS, can the dynamic watermarking be enforced and to display the highest aggregate security classification of all content presented both onscreen and in printout, and can this support standard and customised Confidentiality labels, and can the placement of the watermark also be enforced in a standards-based specific location? e.g. a PPT slide has a label of Unclassified/Public but an embedded Image has a label of Secret/Confidential, then the slide watermark displays Secret/Confidential instead, and in a specific location established by policy and standards.
Has anyone found a way to determine how often the files of an unlicensed user are being accessed (since they became unlicensed or left)? It’s quite challenging to estimate the cost of archiving without knowing how frequently active users might restore data from inactive users. The new report shows how many users and how many GB/TB, but not clue on the activity
When a person is made Inactive I move their documents to a SharePoint Library
Smart - that does mean you need to manage your organization's overall storage limits too.
SPO storage is significantly more expensive than Archive storage (approximately four times more). Therefore, unless your users need frequent access to the data-in which case they should simply copy or move the data-opting for Archive storage is a more cost-effective solution (if you don't or can't delete the data after X days)
@@thormitron While that is true if you are comparing the costs when purchasing more, SPO storage is provided for each user and therefore isn't an additional cost beyond what is already being paid, as I am sure you understand. This of course changes if you have to purchase MORE SPO storage if your tenant is out. But if orgs have excess SPO storage - amounts are pooled for all users, then it wouldn't cost additional money to use that SPO storage.
@@DanielGlenn very true! I wish we had extra spo storage 😅