P Chidambaram Exclusive On New Criminal Laws And Whether They Are Forced Or Made Thoughtfully?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2024
- P Chidambaram Exclusive On New Criminal Laws And Whether They Are Forced Or Made Thoughtfully?.
Three new criminal laws, replacing the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Indian Evidence Act from the British era, and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), will come into force from today, i.e., July 1, 2024.
The three new criminal laws are- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.
The Bharatiya Sakshya Sanhita, 2023, The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Bill, 2023, and The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 were passed by Parliament on December 21 last year.
#pchidambaram #amitshah #bharatiyanyayasanhita #indianpenalcode1860 #newcriminallaws #criminallaw #indialaw #indiatoday #indiatodaynews #rajdeepsardesai #newstoday
Subscribe to India Today for NEW VIDEOS EVERY DAY and make sure to enable Push Notifications so you'll never miss a new video.
All you need to do is PRESS THE BELL ICON next to the Subscribe button!
India Today TV is India's leading English News Channel. India Today TH-cam channel offers latest news videos on Politics, Business, Cricket, Bollywood, Lifestyle, Auto, Technology, Travel, Entertainment and a lot more.
Stay tuned for latest updates and in-depth analysis of news from India and around the world!
WhatsApp Channel: whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va2A...
Download App: indiatoday.link/wHaj
Follow us: Official website: www.indiatoday.in/
Twitter: / indiatoday
Facebook: / indiatoday
😂😂😂 Chidambaram's statement about digital transactions
ಲಂಚ ತಗೋ. ಲೋಕ್ ಆಗೋಲ್ಲ ಅಂತ
Why can't Kongrass publish their views to the Law Ministry, Parliament rather than criticising. Unless these laws will hurt the Corrupt Kongrass....
These sets of laws were LONG OVERDUE.
Chidambaram should have brought new laws ( so called good ones) when they were in power instead of wasting time on corruption.
A convicted criminal commenting on the new laws. Wah kya democracy hai?
Was he convicted or on remand?
Have forgotten that Amit Sha Was in jail for a time?
Old patient better than new doctor!!
Criminals should not dictate or comment about the laws
Who decides that you are not a criminal?
Amendments can easily be revoked or reamendwd, but the LAWS cannot be scrapped per se
INDIA SHOULD MOVE AHEAD WITH THE TIMES,, NOT AGAINST IT
What is NEW in it.?
An official App about laws is good idea , to make police court lawyers and public on same place
Frustrated corrupt rich Chettiyar.
Many believe that these sets of new laws are highly AUTHORITARIAN and HIGH=HANDED. While this may be partially true, India cannot move forward with ARCHIAC, OUTDaTED and MORIBUND laws in the 21st Century.
I robustky believe that the BENEFITS brought about by these new laws FAR OUTWEIGH their drawbacks, and wrong -doers and criminals cannot be set off SCOT=FREE due to technical glitches in the legal system.
SEDITION is now been equated with TREASON, so speakers would think several times before making INCITING and INFLAMMATORY speeches, all in the name of just FREEDOM OF speech, and get away with it with APPARENT blatancy and immunity
So what, if the laws that were genuine have been retained? Does it matter?
Growing wheat crops in flowerpots to claim Tax exemption as a farmer is covered under new criminal laws or not. Chidambaram had it.
If he is open to suggestions , he will put it on hold the implementation until clarification.
According to pumpkin farmer, if these law are just copy paste of IPC, why would it lead to chaos in interpretation 😂
Because sections are interchanged is one simple reason.
Undeclared emergency during the last 10 years; only one man show.
He was a former home,finance minister!!
After watching and listening for 6 min, reading many comments and wondering who are they actually? Rajdeep has already mentioned who is P Chidambaram if any kid doesn't know who PC is, still I can find many comments who has missed that. These viewers may have multiple technical gadgets in hands but deserve very less respect. They can never write few sentences to justify their own comment or what they think of BNS if they are so knowledgeable, but they put abusive languages on PC, India Today. People often reacts so quickly even when he has no knowledge or patience to listen if someone is explaining.
PC has explained so well within 10:56, any educated viewer should appreciate.
To make the transition efficient, Govt should create Electronic Documents for doing Searches for looking from Old to New and New to Old.
An official App is good idea
What about your indian bank scan
What happened to his case. Why the courts are dilly dallying his and Karti's case. If they are innocent let the acquit them.
Old was better
Shame to hear from ex inmate of Thihar !!!!!!!!!
If so isn't a shame for an ex inmate in jail to bring in these NEW LAWS.
@@johnjoseph3622
One went to Thihar on money laundering and asset creation in many many countries abroad and the other fabricated political case totally rejected by Court
Let there be hundreds of such interviews, it doesn't at all matter to the Government
That😢the pity.
Another big mistake by modi
All Namo chachas making comments and these communal Namo groups have no answer to his comments Remember that these bills were passed after 150 members were suspended
Who is P chidambaram?
To continue with sedition as a crime!?
Is this fellow for real!!!???
He wants to legitimize sedition!!!!
Not at all surprising given his “saffron terror” initiatives and sale of sensitive equipment to an enemy country
Yes, PC is the right person to oppose any amendment of 150-year-old laws copied from the West. When the ball was in your court for 60 years from 1947 to 2014, you remained quiet. He will emphasize personal liberty, freedom of speech, etc. But for 80 crores of innocent, villagers, living with USD 2500 per year what is the meaning of all these concepts?
some of our honorable judges remain busy with hearing cases filed by rich advocates on behalf of alleged criminal politicians, every week. For example, the cases repeatedly filed by 2-3 advocates, on behalf of AAP & I N D I alliance leaders are decided in a lightening speed.
Millions of cases of the poorest section, senior citizens, pensioners and cases filed by women alleging rape, tribal people, etc have been pending for decades. Still, some of our honorable judges have not been able to spare time to hear their grievances. Recently our honorable President of India requested CJI to speed up cases of tribals who have been waiting for justice
Justice delayed is justice denied - says the Indian constitution Indian population of 140 million has not resorted to any agitation violence despite the " denial of justice" and has been waiting patiently for our honorable judges to give a date, hear their grievances, and pass a judgement
Indian culture is deeply rooted in democracy. Therefore,140 million people have not lost the idea of democracy but stand for democracy, even without an effective judiciary. Many senior citizens and pensioners died 3-4 years ago but their cases are not decided by the supreme court
What can be done to create awareness among the judiciary to fix priority and to pass judgment within 2- 3 years. Why do many judges have sympathy for the politicians that compel them to take up their cases urgently and pass judgments without any delay? As far as I know, the Constitution assures equality before the law
Political criminals and Rich advocates may be allocated a special bench in lower / high and supreme court so that ordinary citizens can get space
Mr.Shah has been made by GODI MEDIA called him CHANKYA it made him he can do everything and carriedaway by this.
MASTER THIEF CHIDAMBARAM TALKS ABOUT LAW.
Indian Constitution still allows him .
😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉 if you need explanation read it 1000 time .poor man better take rest and relax
P. Chinbaramb the most corrupt politician of india, as said by kejriwal 😂ji
Chidambaram can go to rest
A crook offering his mind set !
Shame to have called this rogue for his opinion
What a shame for one rogue to call another a rogue?
India Today should shame for calling P.Chidambaram
Why do you say so?
Wasting time
Chiddu is a very corrupt guy.He is a partner of Antonia Aunty for all kickbacks.He tried to finish Baba Ramdev .Basically intelligent,but cannot be trusted.
Are you not corrupt too?
I believe he was finance minister during his tenure, why ask him for opinion, how is that any different from any other politician opinion ?
Do you guys think he is jack of all trades
He is very dengerous to the country, he and his son,
It's like saying that a person doesn't even know how to lie. This is what this government can do.
This man is a financial criminal holding a court bail and India To Day is seeking his advice on the current New Criminal Laws introduced by the Modi govt......What a historical joke it looks like.
Congress is always uncomfortable with reforms. They always want to live in British age comfortably.
Criminals in India Today are discussing the news laws with the known criminal.Go to the Chitambarm people will tell the tales of this criminal family.
Repeal 69
We can not be totally free from colonial legacy. Colonial era build a system that cannot be removed for another 100s years - at least it will take 7 generations. Mindset, system, geography, politics, and many. Removal of colonial legacy may lead to the disintegration of the nation - because the idea of India was inbuilt with colonial legacy.
Don’t you have any other leaders except P.Chidambaram to interview ? You are always interviewing only Congress leaders especially P.Chidambaram . It’s boring.
It's good to listen to your enemy also.
Chidambrams wife Let's her House to her Husband ....see the Mastermind of Gandhis Finance controller who grows Cauliflowers in his Wife's balcony worth Millions of Dollors
Criminal chidambaram on indian criminal laws....a real mockery. His accuracy (or rather lack of 😂😂😂 chidambaram on upi, hindu terror, note bandi amd a series of topics proves that he is a criminal mimd without a job and the powerlessness has exposed his lack of right judgement and choice)
But his arguments seem valid here. Do you have any rebuttals to his arguments?
And now are in power doing the same.