“Celtic” in this context is pronounced as “Keltik”, ie pertaining to Celts (Kelts). It’s only pronounced “Seltic” when referring to Glasgow’s other football team.
I think it was unlikely the Cheddar man had dark skin. I think scientists did a DNA test around 2016 which concluded there was a low probability of them having dark skin and most certainly having blue eyes. So Channel 4 at the time took this and ran mile with it and produced a dark skinned sculpter for their documentary that you've shown in this video.
Yea it’s believed he actually looked very similar in complexion to modern Spaniards just with light eyes. So olive skin light eyes and dark hair, but definitely not black skin
The blacks have no history no achievements since their creation. They do this to try and make them feel comfortable but it’s all lies. Even with recent history say 300 years ago they always imply they were many black people here at that time which of course is not true. They have books at school teaching children that they invented this that and the other and that they have always been here which of course is not true again. When I was at school this was never taught this why. On top of that you get a program like this telling lies again. Only time the species came to Great Britain in numbers was 1948. It was Germany who fired the final shot after the war they built the Windrush😩😩😩 well you didn’t think it was an African ship did you.
Cheddar Man has been dispelled as a myth. Scientists say they are not able to tell what his skin colour was, but his complexion was likely to be due to the weather than his race.
Can I ask why you think it’s unlikely. Of the 14 humans found in Europe older than 16k years ago, all are black (not dark) skin with Blue eyes. A bit of academic research confirms the cheddar man’s DNA confirmed black skin and blue eyes.
The reason their isn’t any Italian/Roman DNA in English/ British people is because the romans recruited most of their soldiers from all over the Roman Empire.
Interesting video. I'm an American of British descent. I'm guessing I'm roughing about half Germanic and half Celtic with a large splash of Scandinavian. Sort of goes with this video. 38% Scottish, 32% English, 11%Irish, 9 % Welsh , 7% Norwegian, 3%™ Danish according to my ancestry DNA test results. 9th generation American on both sides of my family.
@@johnpatrick5307 you can say that about many people groupings who have a long history with separate people's uniting under one Kingdom... Scoti , Pics, Britons, Normans, Flemish, Angles, Scandinavian Vikings, and those English that lived on both sides of the border and beyond. I believe they are figuring out to a degree ones Scottish heritage by the family histories of people who have taking the DNA test and comparing. So we can notice that some Scots with a typical French or English dna pattern or haplogroup could be well recognized as actually Scottish do to that pattern , and family being well recognized in that area. It helps to actually know your family history and my DNA patterns are pretty close to my own family tree and history patterns. History and DNA are not perfect yet certainly they work best together as a tool. I believe I got what you were saying. If I did not please enlighten me. I'm not speaking of national identity. I am American. In a genealogical historical setting I'm researching family history and percentages of DNA patterns and then comparing it to an actual family history. I find history and DNA very fascinating and I have been researching and studying both British history and my own family history for over 30 years now.
@@tobyplumlee7602 "Scot" is/was the name of an ethnic group - the Irish were the original Scots - its only in the last 500 years that the Irish have been called Irish! Many different peoples have brought in to being Scottish - with all their history - as you say. So they must be using comparitive techniques to decide if you're Scottish!
@@johnpatrick5307 That's what I thought you were getting at. Yes I'm aware that the actual ethnic group Scoti came from Ireland and that Scotland gets its name from this Irish group of people. Being many cultural groups settled in Scotland besides the Scoti they must make account of that when looking at modern Scottish genetics as well as certain genetics of different regions of Scotland that has a different culture and genetic history. For example my "Scottish ancestry matches close with my DNA percentage and family history from what I have researched. I'm mostly of lowland Scots heritage and I would have Scoti ancestors but a good percentage being that they were mostly from Southwest Scotland is actually Strathclyde Briton, and Anglo-Norman so in determining how much Scottish DNA one has could be tricky and they must take this in account as well as family histories in certain areas. Without that knowledge DNA could be very misleading and not represent well your actual family history. My mother is an American Montgomery of Scots ancestry and her mother a Wallace also of Scots ancestry predominantly. My father is mostly of English ancestry with a high minority of Scottish ancestry as well. So 38% Scottish and 32% English seems fairly reasonable knowing my family tree but like I said it makes you wonder just how exactly they come by those percentages and what determines that number.
The british celts are celticized. The original celts who lived in north central europe for example the gauls were described as blonde like the germanics even so the romans couldn’t tell apart the gauls from germans
I agree. There is a theory that the Welsh are the remnants of the original population of Britain. They are often dark haired and olive skinned (Think of Tom Jones!) They speak a Celtic language that is very different from the Irish Celtic language. The theory is that the invading Celts forced their language and culture on the people they conquered in Britain who were a mixed group of people.
@@michaelhalsall5684 it is believed when the celts invaded the British isles there were already people settled there. Who were likely dark/olive skinned. The invading celts who were a fair indo european steppe people mixed with this population resulting in the dark irish we know today. While some celts remained pure.
@@Based.Afghan The Irish are the most Indo-European people in Europe See: Son of Manu - and therefore the whitest people in Europe. Stop repeating fantasy stuff - you rarely see the English - those you see, like the actors, are Irish. The illustrations of the "English", above, shows Irish-looking people, not English.
@@guleet75 some in Kent but more western England Sorry to disappoint old friend. But some of my Norwegian dna offsets the Celtic dna that's imbalancing celtic dna western England
More than 5 Million Americans today have Norwegian ancestry ! Another 5 hundred thousand reside in Canada !! 33% of Norwegians migrated to North America , only Ireland sent more migrants percentage wise !!!
@@guleet75 my Norwegian ancestry is a remnant of the settlers in the Orkney and Hebrides islands. It's still overshadowed by my English dna. Which, depending on the dna update range, is between 44-52% percent
Oh dear, African genome... I don't think so, and as for Cheddar man being dark skinned, that's also been proved as another pile of poo, in fact he looks more like the two brothers who reconstructed him (just google for more information).
Cheddar man is Western Eurasian, who have dark skin, Southern Arabs, Indians, Southeast Asian hunter gatherers, Native Americans, none of them are African nor are they genetically close to Sub-Saharan Africans. Simply the genetic models tell us that the WHG were dark skinned with blue eyes, nothing more, there is no ancestry, but they are not genetically close to Africans
WHG evolved from Gravettians, the first Western Eurasians in Europe (30,000 years ago), skin color was dark with brown eyes, Gravettians contributed greatly to the DNA of Western Eurasians, Middle East, North Africa and Europe.
Cheddar man looks a lot different to other depictions of their western hunter gatherers from this time i wonder why the British geneticists decided to give him much darker skin, when they have no way of proving this was the case? The ancient Briton known as Cheddar Man, who lived around 10,000 years ago, is often depicted as having dark brown skin and blue eyes. However, the genetics of skin color are quite complex, and we can’t be entirely certain. While some news stories claim he had dark skin, one of the geneticists involved in the research suggests that we still have much to learn about the skin color of ancient humans. His remains were discovered in Gough’s Cave in Somerset, England.
The Celts (pronounced "Kelts) have a long a complicated history within the British Isles. It is believed that there were two invasions of Celts, one from Iberia to Ireland probably via the west coast of Europe and another group who came across the Channel from France. There an amazing genetic difference between the Welsh and say the Scots who are both classified as Celts. Regarding the people of Liverpool a lot of Irish people immigrated there in the 19th Century to avoid The Famine and later to find work. The "Liverpool Irish" are recent arrivals not an ancient population.
The bell beaker people arrived to the British isles from the Rhine region. Irish people want to believe their celts came from Spain however the sad thing is like every migration to Ireland, it came from the British mainland first. The R1b haplogroup dominant in Britain and Ireland is from the Rhine region. No all British isles people plot closest to each other. Irish, English, Scottish and Welsh are all extremely similar
@@AncestrallinguistI'm half English and half Scots/Irish. On my G25 coordinates the dutch cluster sits just behind the British and Irish groups at a genetic distance of 2.4.
@@AncestrallinguistAgree the Irish have a high Indo European Steppe component, the Spanish are more Anatolian like other southern Europeans. Good video
If you read Caeser and Tacitus you will will find that the Romans easily differentiated between Celts and Germans. Possibly because in about 100BCE there had been Germanic migrations, by the Teutoni and the Kimbri, which came near to extinguishing the Republic.
German and Gernanic are not the same. Caesar and Tacitus would not have talked about Germans as their were no such people at that time. The Roman's got the name Germania from the Celts and its believed it just meant Neighbours.
@johnbrereton5229 Have you ever actually read Caesar or Tacitus? The word German is used routinely, being the accepted translation of Teutons. The origin of the word Germania is uncertain. It may come from 'gyr mann' - spear man.
@@ConradAinger No, in fact the word German is not used by Caesar. He uses the word Germani for the peoples and Germania for the lands beyond the Rhine when they lived, not German. Though they were in fact not one people but many different tribes.
@johnbrereton5229 Two years ago I graduated in history, and I still have a copy of Tacitus's On Britain and Germany. ( Trans. H Mattingly) The words German and Germany are used throughout. Germanic relates to German as Celtic does to Celt. Though in fact neither the Gauls nor the Britons called themselves Celts. The notion of 'Celts' is a 19th century construct.
@@ConradAinger Congratulations ! Yes Tacitus does, but then wrote his work 'Germania' about a 150yrs after Caesar. The world Celtic is yet another problematic word which in fact doesn't mean a people, but a language.
The majority of English people have less than 25% Germanic DNA especially in regions not in the heavily settled south east . The Anglo Saxon’s left a genetic legacy but England still retains it’s Celtic genetic identity. Due to the nuance of history those whom are ancestrally from the south east for generations at most tend to have 40% Germanic DNA according to a recent study . The history of the isles is diverse and nuanced but England’s identity is more of a cultural heritage than a Genetic one . The Vikings and others left a legacy as well in some regions on par with those heavily Anglo Saxon areas but that legacy is often just a footnote even to their decedents. The British and Irish isles share a very similar genetic make up especially due to Viking Settlement in Ireland .
There was a mass migration into Britain of Spanish types in the late Bronze Age, bringing Welsh with them - unlike in Ireland. The population would have become darker - then Germanic types came - which made the population Anglo-Spanish!
To some extent this is true, but it has been found that European 'Celts' (actually Beaker-Peoples) are far more spread than previously thought, in that their haplogroups R1a and R1b are most pre-dominant in England and modern day Germany/Austria/'Low-Countries' etc.. Nordic invaders have had far less DNA influence on Britain than previously supposed, and the 'Romans', almost none.
I live in the South of England and I have done a DNA test I am 56% Southern English 25% Southern Wales 9% Scottish 6% Irish 2% Finnish 2% Scandinavian so Britain runs through me like a stick of rock!🇬🇧
You sound like me. My DNA is a map of the British Isles. Well, except for the Tuscan (though part of Tuscany was part of Cisalpine Gaul back in the day) lol Europe 100% Great Britain and Ireland 86.9% Southeast England 24.2% Ireland 13.9% Central England 12.5% Northern Ireland and Southwest Scotland 7.3% Aberdeenshire 3.5% South Central England 3.4% South Wales Border 3.4% South Wales 3.3% Northwest England 2.6% South Yorkshire 2.6% South England 2.5% Cumbria 2% East Anglia 1.9% Northwest Scotland 1.9% North Wales 1.7% Europe (South) 11.2% Tuscany 11.2% Europe (North and West) 1.9% Finland 1.9%
A lot of DNA tests on here come up with a small percentage of Finish DNA, for some reason. I wonder how that can be considering their relatively low population.
The worlds not as old as speculated in this video. Everyone alive today is a descendant of Noah and his family 4300 years ago. His early descendants moved out of Turkey where the ark came to rest and established the worlds earliest civilization in Mesopotamia not far away. After that people groups began to disperse worldwide. the bible gives the names of Noah's sons, their descendants and people groups and their origins.
@@harrietharlow9929 the initial assumptions people make about evidence.. which skews their interpretations.. can be flawed. If your initial assumptions are wrong, everything else you build upon those assumptions ..will be wrong.
Most of this is a crock of shit. If you are interested in who the English ( Briton) really is, consult legitimate videos for University Anthropology Depaetments, not some phony TH-camrs just trying to make some money. PhD Evolutionary Anthropologist, University of California at Berkeley
It's the same information I've found in my own research as well. There are so many people that get so much of their "information" from bogus media outlets that spread disinformation that some may not want to see this as factual. Especially if it doesn't fit their own agenda. History isn't about what sounds right to us, or what we think is rights, it's about actual facts done by actual research
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 วันนี้!! คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
“Celtic” in this context is pronounced as “Keltik”, ie pertaining to Celts (Kelts). It’s only pronounced “Seltic” when referring to Glasgow’s other football team.
True
And Boston, USA's basketball team.
I think it was unlikely the Cheddar man had dark skin. I think scientists did a DNA test around 2016 which concluded there was a low probability of them having dark skin and most certainly having blue eyes. So Channel 4 at the time took this and ran mile with it and produced a dark skinned sculpter for their documentary that you've shown in this video.
Yea it’s believed he actually looked very similar in complexion to modern Spaniards just with light eyes. So olive skin light eyes and dark hair, but definitely not black skin
The blacks have no history no achievements since their creation. They do this to try and make them feel comfortable but it’s all lies. Even with recent history say 300 years ago they always imply they were many black people here at that time which of course is not true. They have books at school teaching children that they invented this that and the other and that they have always been here which of course is not true again. When I was at school this was never taught this why. On top of that you get a program like this telling lies again. Only time the species came to Great Britain in numbers was 1948. It was Germany who fired the final shot after the war they built the Windrush😩😩😩 well you didn’t think it was an African ship did you.
@@chandleryoung9515 Bob on. Olive skin is INDIGENOUS to Europe. Nothing to do with negroes or Indians.
Cheddar Man has been dispelled as a myth. Scientists say they are not able to tell what his skin colour was, but his complexion was likely to be due to the weather than his race.
Can I ask why you think it’s unlikely. Of the 14 humans found in Europe older than 16k years ago, all are black (not dark) skin with Blue eyes. A bit of academic research confirms the cheddar man’s DNA confirmed black skin and blue eyes.
I took a DNA test a couple of years ago.
2% Scottish, 2% Irish and 96% English/North Germanic.
I'm very happy with that. 😊
The reason their isn’t any Italian/Roman DNA in English/ British people is because the romans recruited most of their soldiers from all over the Roman Empire.
Exactly..I was looking for this comment..
I was born in Liverpool in 1967 I can tell you I feel fully English my friend.
A native of Limavady now an adopted son of Birkenhead....married a scouser...best place to be...😅😅😅
Interesting video. I'm an American of British descent. I'm guessing I'm roughing about half Germanic and half Celtic with a large splash of Scandinavian. Sort of goes with this video. 38% Scottish, 32% English, 11%Irish, 9 % Welsh , 7% Norwegian, 3%™ Danish according to my ancestry DNA test results. 9th generation American on both sides of my family.
Scottish DNA? - what that is I'm not sure about
See: Extraordinary Scottish DNA.
@@johnpatrick5307 you can say that about many people groupings who have a long history with separate people's uniting under one Kingdom... Scoti , Pics, Britons, Normans, Flemish, Angles, Scandinavian Vikings, and those English that lived on both sides of the border and beyond.
I believe they are figuring out to a degree ones Scottish heritage by the family histories of people who have taking the DNA test and comparing. So we can notice that some Scots with a typical French or English dna pattern or haplogroup could be well recognized as actually Scottish do to that pattern , and family being well recognized in that area. It helps to actually know your family history and my DNA patterns are pretty close to my own family tree and history patterns. History and DNA are not perfect yet certainly they work best together as a tool.
I believe I got what you were saying. If I did not please enlighten me.
I'm not speaking of national identity. I am American. In a genealogical historical setting I'm researching family history and percentages of DNA patterns and then comparing it to an actual family history. I find history and DNA very fascinating and I have been researching and studying both British history and my own family history for over 30 years now.
@@tobyplumlee7602
"Scot" is/was the name of an ethnic group - the Irish were the original Scots - its only in the last 500 years that the Irish have been called Irish!
Many different peoples have brought in to being Scottish - with all their history - as you say.
So they must be using comparitive techniques to decide if you're Scottish!
@@johnpatrick5307 That's what I thought you were getting at. Yes I'm aware that the actual ethnic group Scoti came from Ireland and that Scotland gets its name from this Irish group of people. Being many cultural groups settled in Scotland besides the Scoti they must make account of that when looking at modern Scottish genetics as well as certain genetics of different regions of Scotland that has a different culture and genetic history. For example my "Scottish ancestry matches close with my DNA percentage and family history from what I have researched. I'm mostly of lowland Scots heritage and I would have Scoti ancestors but a good percentage being that they were mostly from Southwest Scotland is actually Strathclyde Briton, and Anglo-Norman so in determining how much Scottish DNA one has could be tricky and they must take this in account as well as family histories in certain areas. Without that knowledge DNA could be very misleading and not represent well your actual family history. My mother is an American Montgomery of Scots ancestry and her mother a Wallace also of Scots ancestry predominantly. My father is mostly of English ancestry with a high minority of Scottish ancestry as well. So 38% Scottish and 32% English seems fairly reasonable knowing my family tree but like I said it makes you wonder just how exactly they come by those percentages and what determines that number.
@@tobyplumlee7602
Montgomery came from the Normans and Wallace I think came from Welsh/Britons.
Great summary cheers from Sherwood forest Mercia
Glad you enjoyed it
The british celts are celticized. The original celts who lived in north central europe for example the gauls were described as blonde like the germanics even so the romans couldn’t tell apart the gauls from germans
I agree. There is a theory that the Welsh are the remnants of the original population of Britain. They are often dark haired and olive skinned (Think of Tom Jones!) They speak a Celtic language that is very different from the Irish Celtic language. The theory is that the invading Celts forced their language and culture on the people they conquered in Britain who were a mixed group of people.
@@michaelhalsall5684 it is believed when the celts invaded the British isles there were already people settled there. Who were likely dark/olive skinned. The invading celts who were a fair indo european steppe people mixed with this population resulting in the dark irish we know today. While some celts remained pure.
@@Based.Afghan
The "dark Irish" we know today? - do you realise most actors are Irish? - do you ever see the English?
@@Based.Afghan
The Irish are the whitest people in Europe!, that is they are most Indo-European
See: Son of Manu.
@@Based.Afghan
The Irish are the most Indo-European people in Europe See: Son of Manu - and therefore the whitest people in Europe.
Stop repeating fantasy stuff - you rarely see the English - those you see, like the actors, are Irish.
The illustrations of the "English", above, shows Irish-looking people, not English.
I'm not British I'm American but I take immense pride in having English ancestry.
Noah ! Are your ancestors from the eastern parts ? Where Germanic DNA is more likely !!
@@guleet75 some in Kent but more western England
Sorry to disappoint old friend.
But some of my Norwegian dna offsets the Celtic dna that's imbalancing celtic dna western England
A ha ! So you have some Norwegian DNA too !! No wonder your blonde !!!
More than 5 Million Americans today have Norwegian ancestry ! Another 5 hundred thousand reside in Canada !! 33% of Norwegians migrated to North America , only Ireland sent more migrants percentage wise !!!
@@guleet75 my Norwegian ancestry is a remnant of the settlers in the Orkney and Hebrides islands. It's still overshadowed by my English dna. Which, depending on the dna update range, is between 44-52% percent
Oh dear, African genome... I don't think so, and as for Cheddar man being dark skinned, that's also been proved as another pile of poo, in fact he looks more like the two brothers who reconstructed him (just google for more information).
Cheddar man is Western Eurasian, who have dark skin, Southern Arabs, Indians, Southeast Asian hunter gatherers, Native Americans, none of them are African nor are they genetically close to Sub-Saharan Africans. Simply the genetic models tell us that the WHG were dark skinned with blue eyes, nothing more, there is no ancestry, but they are not genetically close to Africans
WHG evolved from Gravettians, the first Western Eurasians in Europe (30,000 years ago), skin color was dark with brown eyes, Gravettians contributed greatly to the DNA of Western Eurasians, Middle East, North Africa and Europe.
Cheddar man looks a lot different to other depictions of their western hunter gatherers from this time i wonder why the British geneticists decided to give him much darker skin, when they have no way of proving this was the case? The ancient Briton known as Cheddar Man, who lived around 10,000 years ago, is often depicted as having dark brown skin and blue eyes. However, the genetics of skin color are quite complex, and we can’t be entirely certain. While some news stories claim he had dark skin, one of the geneticists involved in the research suggests that we still have much to learn about the skin color of ancient humans. His remains were discovered in Gough’s Cave in Somerset, England.
He most likely had olive skin and looked very similar in complexion to modern Iberians
@@codysparks1454 I agree
The Celts (pronounced "Kelts) have a long a complicated history within the British Isles. It is believed that there were two invasions of Celts, one from Iberia to Ireland probably via the west coast of Europe and another group who came across the Channel from France. There an amazing genetic difference between the Welsh and say the Scots who are both classified as Celts. Regarding the people of Liverpool a lot of Irish people immigrated there in the 19th Century to avoid The Famine and later to find work. The "Liverpool Irish" are recent arrivals not an ancient population.
The bell beaker people arrived to the British isles from the Rhine region. Irish people want to believe their celts came from Spain however the sad thing is like every migration to Ireland, it came from the British mainland first. The R1b haplogroup dominant in Britain and Ireland is from the Rhine region.
No all British isles people plot closest to each other. Irish, English, Scottish and Welsh are all extremely similar
This video doesn’t refer to the Liverpool Irish. All British isle populations plot closest to each other compared to other populations.
@@AncestrallinguistI'm half English and half Scots/Irish. On my G25 coordinates the dutch cluster sits just behind the British and Irish groups at a genetic distance of 2.4.
@@AncestrallinguistAgree the Irish have a high Indo European Steppe component, the Spanish are more Anatolian like other southern Europeans. Good video
Thank you
If you read Caeser and Tacitus you will will find that the Romans easily differentiated between Celts and Germans. Possibly because in about 100BCE there had been Germanic migrations, by the Teutoni and the Kimbri, which came near to extinguishing the Republic.
German and Gernanic are not the same. Caesar and Tacitus would not have talked about Germans as their were no such people at that time. The Roman's got the name Germania from the Celts and its believed it just meant Neighbours.
@johnbrereton5229
Have you ever actually read Caesar or Tacitus? The word German is used routinely, being the accepted translation of Teutons.
The origin of the word Germania is uncertain. It may come from 'gyr mann' - spear man.
@@ConradAinger
No, in fact the word German is not used by Caesar. He uses the word Germani for the peoples and Germania for the lands beyond the Rhine when they lived, not German. Though they were in fact not one people but many different tribes.
@johnbrereton5229
Two years ago I graduated in history, and I still have a copy of Tacitus's On Britain and Germany. ( Trans. H Mattingly) The words German and Germany are used throughout.
Germanic relates to German as Celtic does to Celt. Though in fact neither the Gauls nor the Britons called themselves Celts. The notion of 'Celts' is a 19th century construct.
@@ConradAinger
Congratulations !
Yes Tacitus does, but then wrote his work 'Germania' about a 150yrs after Caesar.
The world Celtic is yet another problematic word which in fact doesn't mean a people, but a language.
Draw a line down the map of England. The West side is heavily Celtic, and East Side is primarily Germanic. But we are all now Germano-Celtic.
I’d love you to a genetic history of Sicilian or Italian peoples
We are Germano-Celts….
@@ChristianPatriarchy when did i say Englishmen are Irish ??
More like Germano Spanish - because Spanish types (Early European Farmers) had colonised Britain in the Bronze Age.
@@johnpatrick5307 Germano-Spanish 😂 yeah try again bud.
@@Englishman4412
Jacob Elordi played an Englishman, bud.
@@johnpatrick5307 amazing. That must mean that the English are Germano-Spanish…..
Thank you for this, very informative. It pretty much is about the same information I've found in my own research as well. Really great video.
Great to hear!
So basically English people are Half Celtic half Germanic?
English must be the most influential race, because English is the most spoken language .
It would be cool if you did a genetic breakdown of Greek people as well.
I did. Have a look :)
@@Ancestrallinguist Awesome thanks!
It's pronounced "KELTIC"-HARD C. You're thinking about the basketball team from Boston.
The majority of English people have less than 25% Germanic DNA especially in regions not in the heavily settled south east . The Anglo Saxon’s left a genetic legacy but England still retains it’s Celtic genetic identity. Due to the nuance of history those whom are ancestrally from the south east for generations at most tend to have 40% Germanic DNA according to a recent study . The history of the isles is diverse and nuanced but England’s identity is more of a cultural heritage than a Genetic one . The Vikings and others left a legacy as well in some regions on par with those heavily Anglo Saxon areas but that legacy is often just a footnote even to their decedents. The British and Irish isles share a very similar genetic make up especially due to Viking Settlement in Ireland .
There was a mass migration into Britain of Spanish types in the late Bronze Age, bringing Welsh with them - unlike in Ireland.
The population would have become darker - then Germanic types came - which made the population Anglo-Spanish!
To some extent this is true, but it has been found that European 'Celts' (actually Beaker-Peoples) are far more spread than previously thought, in that their haplogroups R1a and R1b are most pre-dominant in England and modern day Germany/Austria/'Low-Countries' etc.. Nordic invaders have had far less DNA influence on Britain than previously supposed, and the 'Romans', almost none.
The Greeks named all of thee mainland and island people of the west as: KEL TOI - hence the most authentic pronounciation is KELT.
That's NOT CHEDDAR MAN.
Que canal legal ! Eu sou brasileiro e com certeza devemos ser o povo mais miscigenado do mundo 🎉
Thank you William
Celtic is pronounced Keltik, not Selltik like the football team.
Your cheddar man needs lightening up..the attempt at pretending he was african has long been debunked 😅
I live in the South of England and I have done a DNA test I am 56% Southern English 25% Southern Wales 9% Scottish 6% Irish 2% Finnish 2% Scandinavian so Britain runs through me like a stick of rock!🇬🇧
You sound like me. My DNA is a map of the British Isles. Well, except for the Tuscan (though part of Tuscany was part of Cisalpine Gaul back in the day) lol
Europe
100%
Great Britain and Ireland
86.9%
Southeast England
24.2%
Ireland
13.9%
Central England
12.5%
Northern Ireland and Southwest Scotland
7.3%
Aberdeenshire
3.5%
South Central England
3.4%
South Wales Border
3.4%
South Wales
3.3%
Northwest England
2.6%
South Yorkshire
2.6%
South England
2.5%
Cumbria
2%
East Anglia
1.9%
Northwest Scotland
1.9%
North Wales
1.7%
Europe (South)
11.2%
Tuscany
11.2%
Europe (North and West)
1.9%
Finland
1.9%
A lot of DNA tests on here come up with a small percentage of Finish DNA, for some reason. I wonder how that can be considering their relatively low population.
Bollocks!
The worlds not as old as speculated in this video. Everyone alive today is a descendant of Noah and his family 4300 years ago. His early descendants moved out of Turkey where the ark came to rest and established the worlds earliest civilization in Mesopotamia not far away. After that people groups began to disperse worldwide. the bible gives the names of Noah's sons, their descendants and people groups and their origins.
DNA doesn't lie.
@@harrietharlow9929 the initial assumptions people make about evidence.. which skews their interpretations.. can be flawed. If your initial assumptions are wrong, everything else you build upon those assumptions ..will be wrong.
Most of this is a crock of shit. If you are interested in who the English ( Briton) really is, consult legitimate videos for University Anthropology Depaetments, not some phony TH-camrs just trying to make some money. PhD Evolutionary Anthropologist, University of California at Berkeley
Nope. All based on research papers
@@anglosaxon4571 Yes very. It's well understood suppositions were made because they suited the political agenda (diversity etc) of the project leader.
It's the same information I've found in my own research as well. There are so many people that get so much of their "information" from bogus media outlets that spread disinformation that some may not want to see this as factual. Especially if it doesn't fit their own agenda. History isn't about what sounds right to us, or what we think is rights, it's about actual facts done by actual research