First-order reaction (with calculus) | Kinetics | Chemistry | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @j316divinagraciaiii
    @j316divinagraciaiii 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Which Khan Calculus video should I watch to understand this one?

    • @jonwindle8778
      @jonwindle8778 8 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      +Jose all of them

    • @themooseyoyos
      @themooseyoyos 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The one with Calculus in it

    • @satyajeetpatil8177
      @satyajeetpatil8177 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      This is an application of differential equation.
      You need to go through Derivatives, Integrals before you do Differential Equations

  • @dirtroad4229
    @dirtroad4229 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I don't understand what is "d" starting at 1:25 ? What happened to Delta symbol above?

    • @ruverneto7459
      @ruverneto7459 8 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      it's a derivate, from calculus

    • @zebashaikh8499
      @zebashaikh8499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nathan Parrish 'd' is for the instantaneous rate

    • @zebashaikh8499
      @zebashaikh8499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Nathan Parrish 'd' is the smaller change cuz its instantaneous whereas delta is the larger change in concentration

    • @chemistryART
      @chemistryART 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/zCJALBbWeLM/w-d-xo.html

  • @rjravaz8283
    @rjravaz8283 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rather than go through all the steps will the last equation work?

  • @christinesuwandy3005
    @christinesuwandy3005 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANKS !!

  • @coriiuu2886
    @coriiuu2886 ปีที่แล้ว

    im in ap chem and ap calc ab and about to have my chem test, i was curious

  • @khusnur_iffat
    @khusnur_iffat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    all vedios sound is very low that we cannot heear them rightly

  • @thelearner3962
    @thelearner3962 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the differential equation part (the part when he integrated both sides with different limits), I don't really understand why does it work since both sides are of different quantities. For me I will just integrate indefinitely to obtain a general equation with c then use [A]_0 to complete the equation.

    • @chemistryART
      @chemistryART 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/zCJALBbWeLM/w-d-xo.html

    • @tobywang9679
      @tobywang9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your method also works. He uses accumulation function which has been discussed in AP Calculus.

  • @my80yearoldman
    @my80yearoldman 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was blessed. Thanks man. #APSC132

    • @iqraurooj6516
      @iqraurooj6516 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am a Tiger what is APSC132

    • @my80yearoldman
      @my80yearoldman 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Queen's University 2nd Sem 1st year engineering chem.

  • @thegunslinger966
    @thegunslinger966 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is how you calculate the physics of starkiller base

  • @mohimaahmedsneha3860
    @mohimaahmedsneha3860 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is the line of the graph straight and going downward? Can anyone pls explain

    • @tobywang9679
      @tobywang9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The graph is the same as a linear function y=mx+b. In this case, ln[A] is the y in linear function, t is x, and -k is m. Since k is positive, -k must be negative, which makes the graph go downward.

    • @tobywang9679
      @tobywang9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Remember, the equation is ln[A]=-kt+ln[A]0

  • @zechlee9098
    @zechlee9098 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can't we do this without using calculus?

    • @tobywang9679
      @tobywang9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No, lol.

    • @tobywang9679
      @tobywang9679 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Learn some calculus is always helpful on learning ANY sciences.

    • @zechlee9098
      @zechlee9098 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tobywang9679 we don't have calculus in our syllabus tho, but anyways I'm learning it

  • @aduraedosa
    @aduraedosa 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    is this like college level stuff in america?

    • @shahbukhari2573
      @shahbukhari2573 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is first year level chemistry, how is it in your country?

    • @AdityaSharma-lf9xj
      @AdityaSharma-lf9xj 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shahbukhari2573 It is taught in class 12 in India..

  • @shahbukhari2573
    @shahbukhari2573 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there a way to do this without calculus?

    • @alial-musawi9898
      @alial-musawi9898 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Shah Bukhari
      yep, just stick with the derived equation ln([A]_t/[A]_0) = -kt

  • @wedfrest
    @wedfrest 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I still can't get my head around why you take the natural logs. Is this some log law I've missed?

    • @tenorosmanaj5588
      @tenorosmanaj5588 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Chewie Lewie they are tabelar integrals

    • @goclbert
      @goclbert 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is the integral of (1/[A]) d[A]. If you know your calculus, then you know that the integral of 1/x dx = ln(x). It's the same thing.

    • @wedfrest
      @wedfrest 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      goclbert yup cheers

  • @Wolfeywolf16
    @Wolfeywolf16 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please slow down....youre working through this too fast