ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 พ.ย. 2015
- NASA just released a study showing that Antarctica is actually gaining ice at a faster rate than it’s losing it. Will this rise in ice help keep global warming at bay?
What Happens If All The World’s Ice Melts ►►►► dne.ws/1Stb0jj
Sign Up For The TestTube Newsletter Here ►►►► dne.ws/1McUJdm
Read More:
NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses
www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/n...
“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.”
Is Sea Level Rising?
oceanservice.noaa.gov/educatio...
“Sea level indicators suggest that global sea level did not change significantly from then until the late 19th century. The instrumental record of modern sea level change shows evidence for onset of sea level rise during the 19th century.”
____________________
DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
Watch More DNews on TestTube testtube.com/dnews
Subscribe now! th-cam.com/users/subscription_c...
DNews on Twitter / dnews
Trace Dominguez on Twitter / tracedominguez
Julia Wilde on Twitter / julia_sci
DNews on Facebook / discoverynews
DNews on Google+ gplus.to/dnews
Discovery News discoverynews.com
Download the TestTube App: testu.be/1ndmmMq
Sign Up For The TestTube Mailing List: dne.ws/1McUJdm - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
![CAMPปลิ้น | EP.76[2/2] เดินมาสิบกว่าป่า วันนี้รู้แล้วว่าโจโฉกลัวอะไร!](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/R7Yor-t2Au0/mqdefault.jpg)
Why in USA climate change is political issue, not environmental issue?
SpringRoll Wang cuz the cause is humans, i think
***** I think it could be republican party gets a lot of oil money, so they try to convince people climate change is hoax. So it became a political issue...
oil lobby's
because the fossil fuel industry.
SpringRoll Wang
The real scandal is that some people expect the earth's climate to remain the same forever.
Nice strawman there, buddy.
Like your body the earth is a living organism changing continuously. It gives it's residents lessons in humility.
I think it’s odd when people act like we have that big of impact on such a huge atmosphere. We haven’t even used aerosols that long or fossils fuels.
Yes and that will never happen .great point.
@@TheUnQuake crackpot
I used to get scared when I imagine the future, but from today on I’ll not give a shit. I’ll try to recycle my stuff and make the world better place. But no more horror
What bout now
Gore said the ice would be gone by 2015 😂😂😂😂
Gore bought up coastal real estate at the fear height.
limeymax quote his exact words, please.
Stwinge44 why?
limeymax because I would like to see a source for your claim.
Stwinge44 y do u not believe me? I doubt I will find it because it was said years ago
Trace, you're the first one in the history of youtube that apologizes for clickbait, therefor dispite the clickbait, I will still like!
I'm doing precisely the opposite. Clickbait is still clickbait.
Clickbait is evil.
+millenniumdragn I think Buddy Jesus would know if it's evil or not.
No son!We're still punshing them!
+Buddy Jesus This isn't clickbait. It describes exactly what the question in the title asks. You fucking idiots need to stop calling everything clickbait.
Can you do a video on how screwed we actually are from global warming
+Sam Cregeen We've done a couple! Here's a recent one: th-cam.com/video/5L5amXI8Jvs/w-d-xo.html
+DNews Can you do one on animal agriculture and global warming?
+b1ackf0x1233 are you an idiot or just arrogant? do people like you actually think 99.9% of scientists are wrong?
+Sam Cregeen Well that's just pessimistic.
+TG13ores Probably a troll.
It's all clear to me now, soon it will be snowing all summer and global warming will be to blame.
"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive."
twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/265895292191248385
@@Jumptohistory Hahaha funny, the reason we cant compete is the fact that us workers want to make 27 dollars an hour to stand there and spot weld a part on an assembly line when a damn monkey could do the same thing for 1 banana an hour. Don't kid yourself, the reason we fail is Chinese workers will work for far less money plain and simple.
Panagiotis Papadimitriou the media is the one causing the trouble.
Like dailymail. See: th-cam.com/video/kmECHrOcFlc/w-d-xo.html
The science is as clear and transparent as can be, you should look at it directly.
Greg Mcfarland
The reason that we can’t compete is because that was the intention of the elites to begin with, to make the west poor. Here in the United States, President Reagan was the one to open up trade with China and then what followed was encouraging mass outsourcing of our manufacturing to go there.
This is UN Agenda 21. It is a vile plan to impoverish the west and enrich the third world. Man-caused climate change is a hoax they made up to use as an excuse to implement a lot of this abhorrent bullshit.
Greg Mcfarland
th-cam.com/video/BnrLm8y7X0k/w-d-xo.html
I wish I saw this video sooner. It's not just Antarctic ice. I have personal experience. I'm a climber. In 2004 I climbed Fox Glacier in New Zealand. If I go there today, 14 years later, the Glacier has grown more than 1 km. The scree I was walking on then to get to the glacier is under about 10 metres of ice flow. Other NZ glaciers like Franz Josef are also growing.
It is official, we are fucked.
+foday S -- The main reason that we get fucked is because people constantly resort to the intellectually lazy option of seeing only a binary result. Either it's all good or we're fucked. No, it's not that simple. No, we're not fucked. We've got a lot of shit to deal with and we need to fucking get our act together as a species.
So how do we get our act together and what kind of shit do we have to deal with?
+foday S Fixing climate change is easy, but it will never be fixed because everyone on earth is selfish as f**k.
Stop driving cars, don't overuse electricity, home grow your food, eat less meats and fish, don't have more than 1 child per couple.
Do that and the world will be essentially fixed. But it won't happen, because it is much more convenient to let future generations bother about this shit.
+Michael Kasif Let's assume that the world wasn't selfish and we did all that right now. Is it too late? How soon would we see positive change? What would be the knock on effects of a decreasing population? What would be the impact on societies, world over from the elimination of long distance travel. How would food get to tables? Would the economies of the world collapse and send us into chaos and war. Simple fix -- maybe -- but what new problems would be the result? I am always reminded of Yellowstone and the problems humans created by trying to save it. If we can't figure out how to properly manage something of that scale I can't believe we have a full handle on the complexity of climate change and what the consequences of a simple fix might be? Frankly I have more faith in the planet and the environment itself healing its wounds and fighting off infection (us) than I do in humans being smart enough to ever consider every consequence of our actions, well intentioned or not. #hubris
The scary part is that no one knows how this will effect the planet and us.
Ice wasn't growing...when harmambe was alive
Snow1 Paw who's haramambe
Harambe sacrificed his soul in the great beyond to give us ice.
I am soooooo glad I decided to watch this before I flamed you. I was going to send you an application form for the Dunning Kruger club. ))) But your numbers and logic are refreshing.
Glaciers growing? Okay, let me tweak the science a little to explain it ... okay NOW the science is settled.
"I don't understand science so it must not be true" - you.
robotron17. You don't listen, do you?
That's the whole point of science. You adjust the model based on observation, not insisting on the unfalsifiable dogma.
how the fuck can it be gaining more ice, but have lost more ice?! they did not explain this well
+GheyForGames The surface ice is receding into the oceans. Think of this as Ice A into Water B. As the earth continues its seasonal cycle the, the water B freezes into Ice B. Ice B freezes along with Ice A making thicker ice. However, these the centuries old ice caps are still in a regular recession. As we lose Ice A, we get more ice B in the water around Antarctica while the Ice A recedes at a faster rate because the ice B weathers away the ice A.
On top of all of this, the melting of Ice A, is still happening at a faster rate than the pack back from ice B.
+GheyForGames Gaining sea ice, losing land glacier ice.
same here. I still don't understand
and also the fact that it is worse. How can it be worse? shouldn't more ice decrease the sea level?
Ciroluiro it's more ice in the water around the continental body. Antarctica is a desert and rarely sees more snowfall/ice pack on the actual ground.
The ground ice is still melting. It's this melting that's creating a more freeze friendly environment around then continent.
Because the any ice build is from water already off the mainland, the thicker ice would not impact water levels.
Right up there with "can't feel the earth rotating, so it an't"! Too all the late eaters out there.
VaryingViewpoint And let's not the whole " how can TH-camrs have 10+ million subscribers when there's only 6-7 million people on Earth"
KobraNejc 420
Dafaq u saying dude 6-7 million on earth? there are more than 1200 million ppl in india
there is 7 billion people not million.
Larry Thielen Yeah, tell that to most americans😂😂😂. I know that, look who I replied to, thats the point I was trying to make.
devarajakhil matta 1200 million? So that would be 200 billion? Bruh, you were even more off then me😂😂😂
This is the game... No matter what the phenomenon blame carbon emissions. Booolsheet
Next will be a ice age. Magically a report will come out claiming to have predicted it. But co2 will somehow be the reason.
They already said that in the 70s
@@sharko121
THEY were mostly members of the popular press, not qualified climatologists, glaciologists. The majority of the peer-reviewed scientific papers published continued to assert that heating would continue. It did.
@@kimweaver3323 I think solar flares are more responsible for climate change then carbon emissions.
@@sharko121 Then you think poorly. Solar flares are NOT more responsible. They are a fart in a hurricane, being short lived and episodic. They release more charged particles, NOT HEAT. Learn something, will ya?
Reminds me of the activists that sailed into the antarctic, on anm Finish ice breaker, got stuck in the ice and had to be rescued by two icebreajkers, from China and France, causing much increased CO2-emissions.
It is disgusting to hear this global warming shill lying about global warming and sea level rise with the charm of a seasoned propagandist like that on the fake news media. First of all, it is a fact that the earth has been going through cycles of warm and cold according to the solar cycle since human history. The earth has not been undergoing catastrophic or run away global warming as the global warming scammers drivel about.
In fact the earth has been cooling drastically since 2016 due to Grand Solar Minimum.
It has been cooling so much that the global warming scammers have decided to change their scamming narrative to Climate Change blamed on CO2 so that they can continue their scam no matter the climate is hot or cold, no matter it's summer or winter.
The global sea level has not been rising either. An ICPP expert in global sea level research was so angry that the head of ICPP has corrupted his data showing no global sea level rise to lie about global sea level rise that he resigned and became a whistle blower against the ICPP.
@@simon6071 hmm
@@simon6071
'In fact the earth has been cooling drastically since 2016 due to Grand Solar'
lowly educated fool!
thhis is too funny!
don't worry guys I m sure Donald Trump will ban global warming
+LeFlyingSaucer you're so funny omg!
hahahaha
+Walther Schellenberg The mexicans actually are very racists. Especially the white mexicans living in Mexico. Not saying that all mexicans are. But a lot are.
Steven Rivera according to whom?
***** it has been much hotter in the past yes. that was fucking detrimental to the environment back then too. dinosaurs could relocate which wasn't a problem because rising sea levels meant nothing. oh the water is getting a little closer than usual, we need to move. then they get right the fuck outta there. not so easy for us now. it's hard for humans to migrate because we built homes. coastal homes (which there are a lot of) will be completely flooded by the rising sea levels. this will force lots of people to migrate out of where they live. if you were forced to leave your home town for the rest of your life because of weather, you think you would enjoy that? obviously not. and also the polar bear dying thing yatta yatta everyone already KNOWS it's a problem
I'm not looking forward to explaining this to my dad when he inevitably brings this up in one of his anti-global warming rants at Thanksgiving.
Should be easy enough though..
Glacier land ice is melting from global warming and then it freezes in the water around antarctica, making what appears to be more ice since water with no salt freezes in the water first and we have tested the ice and we know it's ice with no salt. Booom, suck it in DADDD! noob.
+Amelia Bee Does he also talk about Climate Gate and question the motives of his government?
He's right it's a scam
+Amelia Bee
You should listen to your dad. Global Warming is a hoax.
+Juan Gonzalez All the damn time. He also doesn't know why we ever stopped using DDT and thinks that we SHOULD be overfishing and hunting keystone species to extinction because WE HOOMIN, DEY NAWT, RAWR!
Has anyone done a study on the reflectivity of that extra SEA ice? I understand the sun is weak at polar latitudes but if you have a growing reflective surface, will that not have a cooling affect?
Yes. The ice increases the albedo of earth.
what I noticed is that its getting colder in certain places and hotter in others. what I think, is that the North and South poles are changing, meaning poles are moving different locations. now imagine if many years from now North Pole is where Portugal is.
Can we please leave this debate to that scientists and get the media and politicians out of it? You just admitted scientists DON'T know for sure the reasons why sea levels are rising; AND that NASA as well as most others say it is difficult to get the real world data.
PLEASE just give the scientists the money they need and then just butt out!
The problem isnt people not looking for themselves, the problem is the scientist don't know what is making sea levels rise.
They need more research so they can have the debate. You two are OBVIOUSLY not scientists.
sea levels are rising because more water is flowing from rivers into the oceans, logically, indicating the primary causes would be higher than average rain/snow fall and higher than average melting of landed ice like glaciers. its rather rudimentary actually. the causes of that would be higher than average temperatures and stronger than average storms, both indicate global warming as the main cause. so the question is whats causing the warming. again, the science is rather clear its the co2, along with other greenhouse gases like methane and water vapor meaning human caused increases in co2 are part of it, but the exact amount is debatable because human activity is on some level compensated for by the environment. so the question is simply how much is the cup over flowing by and thats rather trivial at the end of the day.
props if you took the time to read it, most wouldnt.
WillMePHD If they don't know why, in theyr studies they will cleary end by telling you that they still don't know why.
Reading sir, reading.
Not only I never pretended to state anything scientific but I made no claim except the one that I hate people who base theyr opinions on beliefs. Whether or not they are right.
encino insano but we are in a record drought worldwide ahahaha
There is no debate. It's fact.
Increasing surface ice would cause a cooling effect. Ice reflects sun light back into space. Land and water absorb more solar radiation and convert it to heat.
yes, although I suspect the fact it's mostly there in winter limits this effect.
He didn't mention that the arctic ice sheet is melting 3x as fast as the antarctic one is melting.
the problem is that the CO2 emitions are heating much more than the heat reflected by the increase in ice surface
RutraNickers Meaning Ice is decreasing, heating earth further.
And that could be the way the earth is attempting to compensate for our activity, but you also have to realize Antartica only gets sunlight 6 months out of the year and it is not getting it directly which will reduce that cooling effect. Furthermore increased CO2 in the atmosphere will help to hold in more of that heat.
Gimme Your Monies!!!
Oops, I mean, the end is near!
I went from being confused now this video made it make more sense to me!
while this makes sense, did they actually study the composition of the surface water around Antarctica before making the claim?
+skykid yeah, like every week
If they send planes to scan the surface of vulnerable parts of Antarctica, sending in a boat to collect water samples is a no brainier.
+skykid Why wouldn't they?
rango3526 No they're actually using special planes for it. They send them from South America to do low passes. Something satellites can't do. Research it. It's actually interesting,
droid monkey Oh I didn't know that, thanks.
My brain Just died
Savage
m8.
You said it right in the middle at timestamp 3:26. It's really hard to measure, so the answer is we don't know. To state unequivocally that the ice in Antarctica is increasing or decreasing is impossible to answer. The correct answer is we have a lot of measurements, but we don't really know for sure because it's hard to measure.
3:39 Yeah, and he's building an Ark too.
Saying global warming is just a theory is like saying gravity is a theory and you don't go jumping out your window because gravity is "just a theory"
+Kosta Thomas No, I don't jump out my window because gravitation is a scientific law not a theory. Models of global climate are theory because they can't be explicitly defined by formulas and are likely to change as more data is collected. The idea that increased Antarctic sea ice supports climate change is probably only at the hypothesis stage.
+Kosta Thomas Global warming is extremely complex, I'm a skeptic of it in general but not a denier. Basically I just don't trust what most people say these day's, scientist's or politician's. I can say though, given the overwhelming number of scientist's on board with global warming, it's probably true. I guess my overall take on the subject, is the earth goes through phases, ice age's and warming period's. If I knew enough about the subject I would look into the information myself. At any rate I believe in moving forward with new energy source's right now. Fact is though, oil and coal are resource's and that mean's political power and sway. It won't be going away any time soon.
+Psittac20 You (Sir or Madam) are probably the most realistic, level headed commenter here. Its a breath of fresh air.
btw if you want a better grasp on what contributes to the complexity of global climate, here's an abridged list of factors from my knowledge alone:
Solar cycles, Ocean circulation cycles, carbon cycles in ocean life, terrestrial biologic carbon sources, the capture of Co2 during mountain weathering and erosion, Plate tectonic processes (including volcanism) , Human contributions, Axial tilt and precision cycles, orbital eccentricity cycles, and the albedo cooling effect (possibly related to ice cover in this video).
+Kugelblitz, Seeker of Knowledge, I think you mean "scientific fact". Contrary to popular belief, "scientific law" is not a label used to point out that something is a fact. And, contrary to popular belief as well, "scientific theory" is not a label used to point out that something is a guess or a hunch. The scientific terms "law" and "theory" are different from their lay term counterparts.
I think that was Kosta Thomas' point. Those who keep saying it is "just a theory" have no clue what a scientific theory really is.
+Kugelblitz, Seeker of Knowledge Actually, gravity is less understood than global warming. The two prevailing theories are from Newton and Einstein, but neither fully explain it.
"Dangerous global warming"
*THAT'S WHAT SHE SAID.* 😂
If Earth's climate change is man-made why are all the planets in our solar system also currently going through their own global warming?
Rea Ality .....because Bill Nye said so.
A great question. Not all of them are warming. Neptune's moon Triton, and the planets Jupiter, Pluto and Mars are. Other plants have different cycles than the Earth and tilt at different times. If it was just sun-based, then ALL planets and moons should be experiencing warming. They are not.
@@JohnBaleshiski `How does tilting affect the overall temperature rather than a particular location.
Did anyone bother to ask or wonder whether the claim by @Rea Ality
is even true?
@@DANGJOS, th-cam.com/video/mQgnYw9tPj0/w-d-xo.html
I wanted my refrigerator to be colder, so I unplugged it. The NASA magic has failed me... maybe I need to pay more carbon tax.
Ha ha ha.. Excellent point in a nutshell.
Cis White Dad. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean that it's not true. You're actually flaunting your lack.
@@danzel1157 blindly believing what the lab coats tell you does not make you smart.
@@regularfather4708 Good for you. Who needs bloody science when you've got magical thinking, eh?
I read an article years ago about this exact scenario. But it added that the cold fresh water layer, with the trade winds blowing over it, could contribute to a rapid global cool down; or even a mini ice age.
You do know that fesh water is 7 degrees warmer than the salt water that surrounds the antarctic? So warm water is building the ice?
lol, well thats the real danger of global warming, when the ocean warms it can increase evaporation with the excess moisture blotting out the sun for a decade or century....
Interesting. I expect the growing sea ice to reflect more sunlight, thus cooling the planet and restoring equilibrium. There are so many ‘cool’ environmental processes at work.
“That’s the excuse golem, and we’re sticking to it!” - California Dems upon being asked why California gas prices are 12 per gallon in 2077
I can tell you its extending winter in australia increasin snow and causing snow in places that have never got it before
The paper and other science makes a distinction between sea ice and ice shelves, which protect the glaciers from melting. The sea ice seems to be spreading and this could expose the ice shelves. If they melt there is really no going back. It seems all of these processes are very complex, I don’t really think a layperson like us can just guess it all away with an idea like ‘the ice will reflect the sun and balance it out’. We need to listen to the scientific community and get real in making changes so we can survive.
I use a Galileo Luna dive computer, and I dive at the same time every year on the same reefs in the equatorial Pacific Ocean and the Golf of Mexico. Over the past 7 years, the temperature at 60 feet has dropped 5 degrees!
I'm wondering if the groundwater extraction is playing a role in displacing water that was tied up in thr ground and entering it into the precipitation cycle...
Alot alot what a great thinker you are. Whatever it takes
watched a Shell oil ad before this video.
Figures don't lie but liars still do figure.
If nobody was benefiting from all these figures, I'd be much more inclined to take them seriously. As long as they are being used as an excuse to regulate us into oblivion, please forgive my skepticism.
"regulate us into oblivion"
We don't need to go to a zero carbon emission stone age, we just need to get back under the threshold of natural weathering, its an engineering problem, one that is well within our reach. untrigger yourself.
"If nobody was benefiting from all these figures"
Deniers have billions of dollars on the line, scientists have salaries, tens of thousands of dollars worth. untrigger yourself.
So isnt it gud to that salty water is getting deposited in the Antarctica while fresh water is mixing in the oceans. So the desolved conc of salts in oceans will decrease , so whenever we filter / separate sea water by the osmotic pressure tank, we would need less pressure to purify it, less energy used to make less pressure, so getting fresh water is easier than before
This 2015 study was NOT consistent with other studies. Other scientists reviewed the 2015 study and found lots of issues. You can google it. I don’t have time.
Google the lost squadron.... and then explain how those planes ended up so deep down in the snow.
is that the one that was under 250 feet of ice in 50 years. Based on that, the ice cores only go back a few thousand years.
What? The ice melts and the refreezes 10 feet away? HAHAHAHAHAHA!
Best comment!
I love this guys videos. But oh my God… his hair…… It's perfect.
Titles like this is the reason why people doubt climate change. I wish we debate on how to reduce global warming rather than questioning whether it is real or not.
Exactly
Climate change, the key word. :D
Everyone always says global warming when it's more climate change in general.
"Oh, so we were wrong about global warming?"
"Yeah, that's what this study says."
"Well, I'm suddenly glad we swapped the name to Climate Change then."
The Unknown key words*
Dylan Wight No, global warming is real still, it's just that global warming is one part of climate change.
I know. It's just a favoured tactic of any politician to use very broad terms so that they can't possibly be wrong, even if they're not exactly right
We may be in a general cooling trend, but that's talking millennia. What worries me is that we're rising as quickly as we are. We *should* be falling under normal circumstances. That says a lot about our actual effect on the planet
Great episode. Very informative
- cold fresh water freezes but that is tiny layer and when is on the water that ice floats means half is under water , thing is that new formed ice dont last long melts and new one take it position next year, while old ice that on some places can be up to 6km high and touching land not water keeps melting , so there is why sea level keeps increasing in same rate and the illusion of having more area with ice ....
This was an interesting video.
I'm not convinced but it is interesting.
if global warming is real how can I have ice cream ?
cause my peepee is cold
+Rob Rod To quote one of my favorite Robot Chicken skits, "Bend over and grab your ankles!"
Because cars and fans and winter etc.
+Ara J Houston, we have a problem
Dommy521 it was a sarcastic comment in case you didn't get it
All I can imagine is the ironic part of climate change. Like Greenland actually turning into a green tropical beach resort and the Netherlands really becomming a watercountry (since it'll be mostly flooded)Also people in NY won't have to book flights to Venice anymore because their skyscrapers will form nice channels for the water to run throughBesides that Venice will become populair among divers.Atleast asia will have a bigger garbage can
Gio98art lol
and the thousands of innocent people that die because of storms, sinkholes, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis... *wow this is so funny right? Funny funny funny! Yeeeeaaah!*
Stefano Cuoghi humor is sometimes a coping mechanism. Many people with depression use humor. But sure, lets mock people for joking about serious issues because that's how it's most comfortable to talk about..
You can be serious about an issue and still make jokes about it. I bet you're one of those people that hate rapes jokes as well, arent you? You must be so fun at parties..
yeesh Hein
jadecoolness101 my jokes don't hurt people or races or disrespect the dead and i'm a nice person for it ;D
If we imagine the ice caps as really heavy like tones of weight all being forced down on land. If that land is like a sponge getting compressed by the weight, then as less weight is on top of the ice caps maybe the land underneath the ice caps would raise a little maybe even more volcanoes would erupt under water creating more land... meaning that as the ice caps melt the weight would be spread out meaning land raises increasing the sea levels for this reason also. That would be my guess if water is rising more then expected.
I love reading the comments on videos with controversial topics!
comments are sensed try djorn lomborg the Centre for independent studies
Guys remember it's either the Host kills the virus or the virus kills the host
it's funny how they can't know the weather tommorow but they can know the weather how the weather looks like in 500 years
frallanhockey #11 I don't know where you're from, but they do an excellent job predicting the weather here.
TwiStedTentom never are any forecast 100% right. I've seen them say it was not going to rain no clouds anywhere on radar yet it has rained. So what?
you are wrong they can accurately predict weather for the next day..its called a local area forecast..look one up for your area..you are referring to state forecast which are simply and average..
Weather and climate are different things.
Do you live in Africa or something? In Japan,we can predict the weather of the next week.
basically, as the ice melts away more comes in the way hence more ice to melt and more oceans to fill
I thought some of the temperature fluctuations were caused by the northern magnetic field fluctuation?
Surely it's Greenland's melting glaciers that are causing sea level rise.
also, thermal expansion due to temperature rise.
Mark Grant Scientists have estimated that the Greenland ice sheet is between 400,000 and 800,000 years old. This means that the island today is unlikely to have been markedly different when Europeans settled there. However, there is evidence that the settled areas were warmer than today, with large birch woodlands providing both timber and fuel. This warmth coincided with the period known as the Medieval Climatic Anomaly, also known as the Medieval Warm Period, which can be further learnt about here: goo.gl/HSNZv
So how did Greenland get its name? According to the Icelandic sagas, Erik the Red named it Greenland in an attempt to lure settlers in search of land and the promise of a better life. However, the age of the ice sheet, which is more than 3 kilometers thick in places and covers 80% of Greenland, proves that the opportunities to establish communities would have been limited to rather small areas.
Source:www.skepticalscience.com/greenland-used-to-be-green.htm
Mark Grant New Danish research from the University of Copenhagen shows that large parts of Greenland were covered by forest. This was discovered by analyzing fossil DNA which had been preserved under the kilometer-thick icecap. The DNA-traces are likely close to 450,000 years old, and that means that Greenland was also covered in a large ice sheet 125,000 years ago during the earth's last warm period. This was while the climate was 5 degrees warmer than the inter glacial period we currently live in, the implication of which is that global warming will not impact glacial melt in Greenland and by extension, global sea-level rise. Source: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/07/070705153019.htm
But we now know that Greenland is in fact melting at an unprecedented rate. The introduction of any glacial ice from above sea level, will in turn add to sea levels. Also the desalination of the surrounding waters lowers the waters freezing level, ultimately increasing the amount of sea ice around Greenland. The same problem is plaguing the Antarctic.
Mark Grant Dude, why am I not surprised you fail at history as well as science. Greenland and Icelane were named, respectively, as early Nordic 'propaganda'. Greenland was named such to attract settlers to a very cold and inhospitable land. Iceland was named to deter settlers and invaders. Each was named for its opposite real life conditions. These are historical facts anyone learns in high school history.
WestOfEarth I mentioned this in my first reply to him:
_"According to the Icelandic sagas, Erik the Red named it Greenland in an attempt to lure settlers in search of land and the promise of a better life. However, the age of the ice sheet, which is more than 3 kilometers thick in places and covers 80% of Greenland, proves that the opportunities to establish communities would have been limited to rather small areas."_
*"These are historical facts anyone learns in high school history."* I never learn't this in history class, Icelandic history isn't a part of the Australian curriculum.
Intro: "Hi everyone. Welcome to D news. Today, I am Trace. Tomorrow, I will be Wally."
I know this video is old - but it helps with clarification. Right or wrong, I gleaned from this the idea while the Antarctic ice might be increasing by mass, its mass of the type of ice is not the same as our ecosystem needs. Kinda like a guy who loses a leg and gets a prosthetic - the 'new' leg is there, but it's not the same.
When do we get to see mass human Extinction and will it be live streamed to your u tube channel when will we get coupons
Antarctica ice melts at minus 80 to minus 20 degrees does it?
Could the cause of sea level rise be that accumulating frozen freshwater is denser than the saline portion melting in the sea, thus frozen freshwater is displacing more seawater (Archimedes' principle)?
Salt water is denser.
Watashi Monabehi Whater gets less denser when it's in the solid state. That's why ice cubes float in a cup of what ever there is in the cup.
Rick Groen True is what you said, but you know probably the saying "That's the tip of the iceberg." suggesting that there is more hidden under. And that is the actual case with ice and there is displacement which could be tested simply by having a full cup of water and putting ice in it then some water will be spilled. Frozen freshwater is replacing frozen saltwater, as the video has mentioned, and that is what I said might be the cause for sea level rise.
Malcolm Smith It is true that salt water is denser, but when frozen, in practice, it gets less dense than frozen fresh water because more air is trapped inside. Here is a reference on that: antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/solutions/faq/saltwater-ice-volume.shtml
Watashi Monabehi I didn't think you meant frozen saltwater not that i knew it was less dense anyway.
Though If the ice is on land or pushing down on the sea bed then if the same volume of frozen water rather than salt water would otherwise displace more water that would actually mean lower sea levels than you would have otherwise?
Maybe its just volume on average increasing as temperature rises? But i could well be wrong as sub 4 degrees a rising temperature would make it more dense.
Well it kind of makes me think they are not sure what's going to happen except things are changing. Its always changing though.
Climate Change or as I learned it, weather.
Except apparently in the artic where the story is less sea ice is evidence of global warming! Less sea ice in the artic is global warming more sea ice in Antártica is global warming. Duh?
they twist everything so it fits their narrativ just like rona
Johnny Lawrence said global warming is due to huge amount of hot babes
All that sun screen is getting in the iceburgs.
3:40 "Now we aren't 100% sure why" Buried the lead, eh?
So how does this look in light of the melting ice caps today?
This video in a nutshell. "We don't know what's going on but whatever it is we have been right all along we just need more research (i.e. money) to figure out how to explain we are right about climate change (i.e. that thing we used to call global warming)
Well, this dude doesn't really know whats going on. We do.
What, do you think scientists just pocket the money? Lol
How is that related?
JohnFruscianteMarkLa Example?
That person who "exposed" nasa has no expertise in climatology. There WOULD be an investigation if there was something to it. The money is in companies, especially big oil and all other branches using fossil fuels - don't you think those would be opposed to anti-CO2 regulation? A lot? Who do you think would profit off climate change?
Yes, LOL
Why doesn’t any of those global warming gurus ever talk about sea water evaporation?
Because they haven't thought of that yet.
They do. Google "sea water evaporation and global warming"
Madzguy007. Why don't you find out why they don't?
i live in western pa and it's been colder than usual
Nasa said so...
Closes browser tab.
Member when they said we would be under the ocean by 2012?
Who is "they" ?
The scientists who came up with the theory of Global Warming.
Oh, in that case no I don't remember cause it never happened.
fuck off shill.
WTF
Hmm, well even if Global Warming is a myth we still should switch over to renewable energy. Or maybe just clean Nuclear energy. Pollution is a big enough issue by itself.
Ethan Gray that’s the problem. Nobody is sayin that we shouldnt look to be cleaner and try and curb pollution, it’s the politicizing climate change to do so that’s the issue. The hysteria is all fake and profit motivated.
Hmm, I wondered why and how happen an Ice Age after a Warm up. Now I see that if there is warming then more ice melt and that's makes the water freeze quicker.
I'm thinking about ice sheets 2miles thick above Chicago, and the sea level being approx a hundred feet lower than today .... and I'm thinking meh, these people just need something to get hysterical about
Ready yourself for GLOBAL COOLING
We been there done that... then it was Global Warming... now” Climate crisis” and climate Change, cause some people Believe that the climate is never supposed to change... only the weather, but that we are causing the climate to change.
@@lunaflamed Climate changes. FOR REASONS. This time, it's because of human activity. It's changing far faster than most species can adapt to. About 10,000 times faster than "natural" climate change. So, it's now something different..... habitat collapse due to climate disruption due to human activities. We are a force of nature now. As of 2017, humans moved more dirt, rock, soil than natural forces moved. BAM!
wait i thought we went threw that in the 70's is this like fashion everything old is new again
@@rayzimmermin Yeah, the rapid heating began in the late 70s. It's worse now.
@@kimweaver3323 wait you mean like the rapid heating tha caused the dust bowl in the 1930's just before the cooling of the 40's thru 70's just to go back to heating from the 80' to the 10's and now its cooling again like it did on the 40's thru 70's
almost like its a natural cycle or something already proven by the ice core samples long term global records
but ya it's all man made and getting worse not just doing what it has been doing for thousands of years
also the things that causes the ice ages and what made the earth as cool as it is were caused by asteroids and the earth has been warming back to pre impact temps ever sense and just like a glass of water with ice in it the timp will slowly rise until the breaking point where it will warm up exponentially until it is room temp the global warming we are experiencing is just the earth reacclimating itself to pre impact conditions and it's all influenced by sunspots and their effect on the space around the sun
What if a supervolcano erupts and global warming stops mattering.
Put on suncream
+EqualsThreeable Then it would get extremely cold because of all the volcanic ash in the atmosphere blocking the sunlight.
+JellybellyWaffles However, once the ash dissapears, we have the same problem yet again. If you suggest that the ash stays in the atmosphere long enough that we don't have to worry about global warming for a long time, then most of our vegetation will die out as all plants rely on sunlight to live.
+Greenland yes but around half the people on planet will die so less people less warming
+EqualsThreeable Then a majority of people will be dead, the atmosphere will have even more Co2 and we will be more like our planetary sibling Venus. Something to look forward to I guess.
The earth axis is slowy tipping as time goes on. So that means that the ice caps will continue to move. A little less ice in this direction. Little more ice in this direction
Well if people know about snow usually it holds less water than its mass so if it was melting i wouldn't worry so much. What should be done is how australia handles its means to get water. By getting it from the sea so if it actually is rising that may help hold the rise.
I am now depressed. More depressed. 😩😣😢😭
Thank you.
When water freezes it grows by 3% so the increase of ice makes it heavier and pushes water up and make more ice and away making sea level go up
Wyatt Oxley water is at its maximum density at 4 degrees so when it freezes it becomes less dense which is why ice floats. sea ice is just so massive that some of it will be under water so you may be partially right but for the wrong reason.
actually, the volume the floating ice displaces on the sea water is exactly the same volume that frozen water would occupy if melted. it's called Archimedes' principle.
That's complete nonsense. What you're basically saying is that because the volume increases, so does the mass. That violates the law of conservation of mass - that mass cannot be created or destroyed. The mass remains the same, which causes the density of ice to decrease, which is why it floats in water.
Carlos Fernandez i didn't say that, you didn't understand my coment
I want to have a glass of ice water and then all the ice in my glass melted and my glass overflowed
It has a blanket of atmosphere cold air a natural forcefield Antarctica is in its own atmospheric bubble and takes a lot more greenhouse effect to puncture the atmosphere of the article land mass
Very nice now if there is more ice it’s bad you’re making this harder to believe
buy boats now buy buy buy sail away with me...lol
we will built boats that were used in the movie 2012
+shiva sandycandy lol
+MC Yooper Prepare for Water World.
+PyroMancer2k
Man, that was one of the most expensive movies to make ever... :-)
Why do people forget to explain that the Artic/Greenland melt is greater than the Antartic freeze?
The question is what part of "global" you don't understand... if its melting on North Pole and freezing in South Pole then its not global! And the guy in this video is lying and you can find NASA article about it, aparently some scientist there styll didnt get proper big juicy grant to reaseach "global warming"!
90% of humans live north of the equator.
Shouldn't the sea ice melt first rather than freeze considering salt ice freezes at a lower temperature? I would expect an expansion of fresh ice frozen and a increase of salt ice melting.
but it seems that the opposite has happened.
the thing is when we are having summer season,
its winter at antartica.
when we have the winter season,
antartica is having summer season.
A+ thumbnail
I've encountered a wild Julia.. Get it? No? Okay ._.
+Potato I've been playing a lot of Omega Ruby lately, so I got you bro :D
Did he change the thumbnail or something?
+Warrior Son you mean water vapour trails from thousands of jet planes. there is no 'chemtrails' conspiracy. not necessary anyway. the particulates from aircraft and industry are causing huge global dimming, which is masking about 1 c of global warming. if that shit stopped, global temps would shoot up dramatically. AGW is much worse than is thought / accepted. if the 30 year lag, dimming, methane and positive feedbacks are combined we are guaranteed 4 c by mid century and at least 6c by end of century.
andy765gtr if you'd do 5 minutes of actual research you'd know weather modification is indeed real, and that "chem trail" is now merely a blanket term for geoengineering. Google it, ignore snopes, check out scientific studies
Short answear: It isnt. Western Antarctica is losing ice and have done for quite a while, and the pace of it is increasing. Eastern Antarctica is gaining ice and have done so for thousands of years. But the gain is slowing down and the net balance is turning towards a loss. The ice that is actually growing is the winter sea ice, the one that is floating at sea. But it melts every year. In total, Antarctica is not growing.
WHERE IS your DATA about this?
Greek alphabet guy: The real scientists. I will not google this for you. It is out in the open, just google it. Jezza: no reason to be rude, weather you adressed me or greek alphabet guy. I will not comment further on this thread.
go back to school.google has TONS of different information about the subject. cheers
Jezza Clarkson he is just asking for advice chill
Filip Wessman ''Short answear: It isnt. Western Antarctica is losing ice and have done for quite a while''
nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/
Er no it's not.
As a lover of science I always say go back to the data. When I look at the data I notice the rise of sea level is a straight line. No acceleration. None. No acceleration despite Al Gore's, or Hanson's predictions. For the past 20 years. Do you know, scientifically, what the significance of that is?
My guess is that they're all full of shit? Ah...ya!!
This aged really badly now the ice growth is out weighing the ice melt
3:40 "NOAA says 'yes the seas are rising, the thing is, *now we aren't 100 percent sure why.'"*
That means less supporting evidence for *man made* climate change if *"now"* we are *less "sure"* of a cause than we were before. The video never blamed climate change on it on man's involvement, but that is the main debate.
There are ocean level scientists that say the oceans are not experiencing unusual rise. It has been rising about 7 inches per 100 years since the last ice age and that has not changed since the increase in CO2. Climategate is sophistry 101.
Source?
G Buz
Your details are wrong.
Sea level trends ( tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.html ), shows that sea level has been rising on average world-wide *a quarter inch per year,* a rate that has not changed since the 1800s (it is still true that it hasn't been accelerating in more recent times like they tell us).
William Euler
He overestimated the amount of inches. It is actually less than that. See the link I just left.
@@anti-ethniccleansing465
into all see levels are rising though at least not every year, there are parts of sea that are rising at 1 part but not at another, I dunno if the moon whatever is effecting it but this reasoning is far from being known 100% just like the guy in this video says himself.
the more I look into this the more I'm thinking I'm getting shammed thb
The models always get it wrong.
Mr Whitworth. Quite the reverse, they mostly get it right.
Good video.
even though im late to the commets but you should do a new video about this
This video demonstrates the fundamental problem with discussing these types of issues. Its the level of ignorance that seems to be increasing from our failing as educators as it comes to STEM fields. Not just from teachers and parents, but from all of us taking an elitist attitude towards our lives.
the real question is, can we recover from the damage after Global warming's effects are felt more directly? I sure hope so...
+Nick Hare I believe we are reaching a point where just reducing emissions won't be enough, and need to focus on adapting to the changes. Ofc it probably won't happen until it's too late, and many people will die and be displaced in the process.
+Nick Hare How does this video demonstrate "the fundamental problem with discussing these types of issues"?
A majority of people will not allow themselves to understand a system this complex. Their thought process stops at "It's cold out, so GW cannot exist"
+Nick Hare I imagine people going to war over the land that is ultimately less affected by the climate change or taking aggression on the companies involved than adapting/fixing the problem.
pretty sure we're fucked.
+Nick Hare Do you know how much it would cost to reduce the global temp by 2 degrees? About 300 billion dollars. It's called cloud whitening, a couple thousand ships spraying sea water into the air. More white cloud cover = higher reflection of solar radiation. No need to spend 800 billion a year on research and no need to reduce carbon output.
The earths just recovering from ice age
Yes and that spike in CO2 ppm from 280ppm to 400ppm in 200 years, when CO2 never went above 300ppm in 325000 years is totally because of the ice age
Water is a diamagnetic material. It shouldn’t be affected a magnetic field. The Earth is currently undergoing a geomagnetic reversal. The thermal motion of some of the partially charged atoms in the water. This increased magnetic field is giving rise to Lorentz forces in the water making the oceans slightly magnetic. Therefore, the increased positively charged water molecules in the North are migrating to the more negatively charged molecules at the South Pole. There should be evidence of this in the Northern hemisphere, including increased droughts, volcanism/plate tectonic activity, increased extinction of species that rely on magnetic fields for migration, etc. Those are my thoughts.
It means some one control earth falling rate in space because faster we fall more cold anartica and if we slow down falling mean more melting and more gravity force if we fall slow and less gravity if we falling faster