Learn how to design and build your own high-quality composite parts and structures! Sign up for the Aerospace Composites Course here: darkaero.com/courses/aerospace-composites Online version available here: darkaero.podia.com/aerospace-composites
Very impressive lecture. When you performed the load testing of the complete wing, even though the wing withstood the load, how do you know if internal damage has occurred ? Do you have inspection hatches/ holes to enable say fibre optic visual inspection, or are there other NDT testing methods available….strain gauges, ultrasound etc… Inevitably the wing will experience stress/strain reversal which in an Al structure will lead to fatigue, do these composite structures delaminate ? How do you plan to verify the structural integrity while in service ?
I mean this as a huge compliment. In your next life you would make a fantastic Mechanical Engineering Professor. You have the rare ability to explain complex concepts in an easy to understand presentation. Thank you.
I really like your project and your videos. As a mechanical engineer myself I like your factual, no marketing bullshit approach to your videos and also to your product itself. A breath of fresh air in the "sell pie in the sky" startup world.
At 6:38 you show the Hollow Grid wing. It is beautiful. I had read some years ago that the primary wing spar structure should be in the traditional location. Having primary load carrying structure closer to the trailing edge of the wing could cause wing structure issues in flight and lead to possible wing failure. Can you comment on that? Thank you.
I can’t stop looking at that beautiful carbon fibre 😍 fascinating discussion about why you’ve made the choices you have, and how it benefits the design.
I really, really, really like that you guys are product-focused and engineering-centric. That takes care of marketing by itself, as opposed to others "sell impossible performance first, figure out how to make it close-ish enough that you are not sued later" like the Raptor fiasco.
Great to be able to come along on your journey. Thank you for the big effort you are putting in to share your story and educate us along the way. Very exciting project! Cheers from Sydney - Dave
I think it's essentially gravity drain through interconnected compartments and a large reservoir between the wings to collect before sending to the engine fuel lines.
I always look forward to your new releases. These videos are great for educating and building confidence in your design. I’ve always wondered however why are you teaching building classes to people who are not necessarily interested in building your aircraft?
This channel is a Gem for the engineering community, it doesn't has to be applied on building specifically their aircraft in order to be useful for us. Knowledge is always useful
Excellent damage tolerant design. Multiple load paths reduce the risk of single point failure. You explain complex engineering principles in a direct, easy to understand manner.
Excellent content and presentation, guys! You all have great skill at not only highly technical processes but also the ability to convey it down to our level without coming across as condescending or droll. Congrats! keep them coming!
It's always nice to see machines being built as embedded thought, taking maximum advantage of the properties of the materials. Relates to "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
I started watching these, because I just love fast and efficient aircraft. However, these videos provide such an in-depth insight into composite manufacturing that my engineering interest now benefits more from it than my passion for flight 😄
Your comment about testing vs simulation is so very true and ultimately important. Simulation is only as good as the data that's entered and all too often what's thought to be complete has omissions. Empirical data from testing will fill in the simulation gaps and keep you and your passengers safe. Thanks for the video and explanation.
Designing and building a plane is pretty cool but the materials and structure knowledge your team has developed is even more impressive. Honestly, with your skills, you could probably be designing and building about anything!
I would love to know if you guys have been surprised by anything you've learned yet while building this very coot plane? Is there anything that you just didn't even think about or is the building and design process calculated to the last detail and you haven't been surprised by anything? Keep up the cool videos, I get excited when I see a new one.
Hi Paul! Thanks for checking out our videos and thanks for the great question. Yes, lots of surprising challenges popped up along the way. A big one was canopy manufacturing, which turned out to be much more involved than expected. We spent too much time on that before we ultimately outsourced the process. We might try to bring it back in-house at some point. Making large honeycomb sandwich panels to meet our own standards turned out to be hard as well. We figured out how to do it at a small scale pretty quickly, but scaling it up was difficult.
Kudos. You guys are so professional and so generous with your time in sharing your knowledge and vision. If I was 40 years younger I would beg to work with you.
On the manufacturing topic, could you give us some insight into how the hollow grid is bonded to the skin? Specifically how you can count on that in a tank application.. Love these videos, incredible content. Great job guys!!!
Agreed, love the innovative ideas and think this is brilliant for things like control surfaces. But have to admit I am skeptical of that being used as a tank. There is a whole lot of bond area there and if any bit of it fails it will both leak and be inaccessible for repair.
Phenomenal video! I wish I had seen this one year ago before I designed the airfoils structure on our FSAE car. Going to pass this video on to my classmates.
That was a treat. Lately, I too am using carbon fiber (foam cored) sandich panels, CNC cut to manufacture the internal structure of an aircraft. I second that the benefits of that approach being no-tool, large stock, easy design change, are extremely undervalued.
This was incredibly well explained and you're a very good speaker! I'd heard of the DarkAero but wasn't really following it, I watched this out of pure engineering curiosity. Definitely interested in hearing more.
Thoughts about the very linear stress strain curve of carbon fibre? I am a structural engineer - in seismic engineering we use the non linear section of the stress strain curve (from yield to ultimate) to dissipate seismic energy (hysteresis - ie with steel ultimate strain is ~2.5x yield). This allows us to design for lower seismic force level and we intentionally let the building go non linear to dissipate energy - with the primary intent to prevent collapse (and the building is also not likely useable after a design seismic event). In the high performance sailing world, I think this has been one of the fundamental issues with CF. They are hitting yield loads followed quicly by structural failure because of the lack of a yield plateau (there is no ductilty). Do not know how the aeronautical codes are written but IMO, use of carbon fibre probably needs higher factor of safety in comparison to say aluminum. With CF you basically cannot afford to go past yield...
Very intelligent engineering related to manufacturing simplicity. That was your biggest achievement. Smooth and deliberate presentation of information. I love the hollow grid design, it is more organic and this should be the direction taken psychologically with all engineering and architectural thought processes. Well done gentleman, I will take your course as it sounds like great FUN ! And it may give me new insight to precast, aerated concrete panels inlaid with an organic matrix. Thankyou.
That’s how Lear jet did their wing in the 60’s. They used that on all models but the 40 &70 series. Rather than a main spar and an aft spar, they went with 8 “spars” and the entire wing is one fuel tank.
I'm curious how you are bonding to the wing skins -- are you using a jig to secure the shear webs for bonding? How are you guaranteeing the quality of the bond fillets between webs and upper and lower skins?
Thank you for your detailed explanation! I have one question: how does your wing structure accomodates torsion? I mean, classical wingbox (the front spar, the rear spar, the skin between) is used for torsion stiffness also. Is the same approach in your structure (the front and the rear spars are stronger than other)?
Great video, and you are selfless in what you share. Another reason we should be moving away from ribs and spars, is that they are an outdated function. They were needed to take mechanical loads when we had cloth wing skins! Now we have wing skins with serious stiffness/weight properties, we really don't need them so much! Yes theres shear to deal with and face collapse, but i love your design. Be really interested to know how you connect the cell spars to the upper wing skin when you close the structure, how do you know the glue is touching? :) Cheers from UK
I'm interested in knowing if having an incompressible fluid filling the wing produces any changes in how the wing performs under the same test loads and flexing. Could the fuel load the internal structures and possibly separate the ribs from the skin?
Chances are low that i will build my own airplane (except a small one out of paper) , but i really enjoy your vids. Very informative and a joy to watch. Well done!
For these thin walled structures the failure mode would inevitably be local buckling on the compression side but I can't seem to find any robust mathematical framework to predict this buckling. Also what should the spacing and configuration of the ribs be? Can you point me in the right direction? thanks
@DarkAeroInc Genuine question: Wouldn't it be better to distribute the spars keeping equal celular volume instead of equal distance in between spars? On your approach, it seems like the denser and stiffer part of the wing is towards the trailing edge. Was it deliberate?
Almost certainly easier, assuming You obtain the velocity/pressure distribution over the airfoil at several important angles of attack. It is simpler to integrate loads to multiple shear webs, and wing skin cells, than over an entire wing, flowing to a single spar which is constrained in placement due to thickness, and location of the Aerodynamic center.
Nice video. I got interested about your hollow grid concept. Did you analyze the possible failure modes associated to having such a thin sandwich shear webs. I'm particularly worried about debonding in the T joint (between shear web and skin). How did you address this problem.
Is this a top skin that is then epoxied to a bottom skin (after adding reinforcement sandwiches)? If so, how where you able to epoxy the front leading edges to one another when the material layed up is so thin? Are you gluing a thin edge to a thin edge?
Hello, very nice design, I deal with carbon strucures as well even thow not in the aero field, and One of the issues I have to face Is brittleness of carbon strucures. How do you deal with that for instance to avoid cracks from impact with birds?
This is really sick stuff, innovative, different. Interesting thing I noted about y’alls hollow core concept is that something similar is has been used in some 3D printing RC airplane designs too, going as far as to place stingers at angles to the width span of the wings. Its all fascinating
A similar design is used in fighter jet wings also. One that comes to mind, is the F-104. Where compressed bleed air from the engine was sent outboard through the wing, and emerged from ports precisely located to blow air over the flaps when deployed. "Blown flaps" as they were called, reduced approach speeds significantly as long as the engine was kept spooled up and compressing plenty of bleed air. Losing the engine in this configuration, when landing, was unrecoverable. Such were the 1950s.
I have a project that I am working on... using a laminate consisting of 2x2 twill, 10oz triaxial and 5 harness. About 10 plys... what is a good feed rate / pass thickness amd plunge for the CNC? Thanks in advance
I assume that there will not be a "tank" in the wing or a bladder in the wing for the fuel. As the chambers inside your grid wing are quite small, how are you managing fuel flow and scavenging inside the wing? Are there small holes in the grid to allow flow but limit sloshing of the fuel.
I really enjoy the videos of your progress. I do understand your reason for your design; however, do you guys think that you might design a slightly slower plane with a lower stall speed in the future? I think it would be awesome if you could use the same format with interchangeable wings to keep your cost down. Just a thought. I'm a new pilot and have no business in a plane with thin wings and a high stall speed. I'm sure a lot of new pilots would agree (or at least should agree) you could hit both sides of the sales. just a thought. I can't wait to see the final product. Good Luck!!
The wing is structurally joined to the fuselage with four large bolts (two on each side of the wing). There are a bunch of Click Bond nutplates on the forward and aft edges of the bottom wing skin that tie it to the bottom skin of the fuselage. There are a few other Click Bond studs used to support the sump tank and fuel lines.
Thanks for sharing! Well somethimes the best overal design is not only the 'best' functionally; for example in therms of weight or mechanical strength. Often manufacturability, serviceability, and availability, supply chain (availability of technique) and cost play an important factor too. I wonder how you guys at DarkAero made the full trade off, for example; Is the 5% weight reduction now worth 2x the cost in manufacturing? Lets say one damages its left wing against a hanger door; can this be repaired without bringing the full structure back to DarkAero? Or is there a common understanding if this Honeycomb.
Learn how to design and build your own high-quality composite parts and structures!
Sign up for the Aerospace Composites Course here: darkaero.com/courses/aerospace-composites
Online version available here: darkaero.podia.com/aerospace-composites
Im curious will yall have a jet engine variant in the future like Sonex has done?
We must be getting close to take off.
Very impressive lecture. When you performed the load testing of the complete wing, even though the wing withstood the load, how do you know if internal damage has occurred ? Do you have inspection hatches/ holes to enable say fibre optic visual inspection, or are there other NDT testing methods available….strain gauges, ultrasound etc…
Inevitably the wing will experience stress/strain reversal which in an Al structure will lead to fatigue, do these composite structures delaminate ? How do you plan to verify the structural integrity while in service ?
Brilliant thanks for offering this to the Web. Class.
I mean this as a huge compliment. In your next life you would make a fantastic Mechanical Engineering Professor. You have the rare ability to explain complex concepts in an easy to understand presentation. Thank you.
I really like your project and your videos. As a mechanical engineer myself I like your factual, no marketing bullshit approach to your videos and also to your product itself. A breath of fresh air in the "sell pie in the sky" startup world.
Haha, yeah, no battery electric powertrain. I guess the long range requirement killed that in the first 5 seconds of analysis.
I would agree. Engineer here too.
Yes, this team is a breath of fresh air. Let's hope they do well after all their effort.
Extremely good and concise presentation of the right way to do wing design! Can’t wait to see her fly!
At 6:38 you show the Hollow Grid wing. It is beautiful. I had read some years ago that the primary wing spar structure should be in the traditional location. Having primary load carrying structure closer to the trailing edge of the wing could cause wing structure issues in flight and lead to possible wing failure. Can you comment on that? Thank you.
I was always curious about the solid foam core vs hollow composite wings. Cool to see you guys came up with your own unique solution
Damn your white board drawing/writing skills are good. Aesthetics for days.
I can’t stop looking at that beautiful carbon fibre 😍 fascinating discussion about why you’ve made the choices you have, and how it benefits the design.
Great explanation, I undestood most of it and I'm not an engineer.
I really, really, really like that you guys are product-focused and engineering-centric. That takes care of marketing by itself, as opposed to others "sell impossible performance first, figure out how to make it close-ish enough that you are not sued later" like the Raptor fiasco.
Its very inspiring stuff.
Great to be able to come along on your journey. Thank you for the big effort you are putting in to share your story and educate us along the way. Very exciting project! Cheers from Sydney - Dave
Nice video!
I'm curious to see how the fueltank works with so many compartments.
I think it's essentially gravity drain through interconnected compartments and a large reservoir between the wings to collect before sending to the engine fuel lines.
They act as natural baffles.
I'm with you, would like to see the fuel tank design, seems like you would need a lot more sealant, which would mean more weight.
@@divyajnana More sealant for what?
@@divyajnana Watch their videos from beginning to end and you will then know what you didn’t before. 😉
I always look forward to your new releases. These videos are great for educating and building confidence in your design. I’ve always wondered however why are you teaching building classes to people who are not necessarily interested in building your aircraft?
Diversified income, fresh ideas brought up by students, future employees...
This channel is a Gem for the engineering community, it doesn't has to be applied on building specifically their aircraft in order to be useful for us. Knowledge is always useful
For the same reason you and I watch their videos
Excellent damage tolerant design. Multiple load paths reduce the risk of single point failure. You explain complex engineering principles in a direct, easy to understand manner.
Wow, so well explained, detailed and concise. Love the idea that you don’t need mould so you can change the design quick and easily.
Looking forward for the test flight!
Excellent content and presentation, guys! You all have great skill at not only highly technical processes but also the ability to convey it down to our level without coming across as condescending or droll. Congrats! keep them coming!
It's always nice to see machines being built as embedded thought, taking maximum advantage of the properties of the materials. Relates to "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
I started watching these, because I just love fast and efficient aircraft.
However, these videos provide such an in-depth insight into composite manufacturing that my engineering interest now benefits more from it than my passion for flight 😄
This is interesting. Love to know more about the testing and simulation, in particular higher energy dynamics, heating, impact, electricity, etc.
Terrific instruction. Clear, concise. Your flow is clear. You anticipate questions. Thanks.
Your comment about testing vs simulation is so very true and ultimately important. Simulation is only as good as the data that's entered and all too often what's thought to be complete has omissions. Empirical data from testing will fill in the simulation gaps and keep you and your passengers safe. Thanks for the video and explanation.
Awesome video, great explanation. How are you bonding the ribs/shear webs back to the skin with the distributed spar?
Designing and building a plane is pretty cool but the materials and structure knowledge your team has developed is even more impressive. Honestly, with your skills, you could probably be designing and building about anything!
I would love to know if you guys have been surprised by anything you've learned yet while building this very coot plane? Is there anything that you just didn't even think about or is the building and design process calculated to the last detail and you haven't been surprised by anything? Keep up the cool videos, I get excited when I see a new one.
Hi Paul! Thanks for checking out our videos and thanks for the great question. Yes, lots of surprising challenges popped up along the way. A big one was canopy manufacturing, which turned out to be much more involved than expected. We spent too much time on that before we ultimately outsourced the process. We might try to bring it back in-house at some point. Making large honeycomb sandwich panels to meet our own standards turned out to be hard as well. We figured out how to do it at a small scale pretty quickly, but scaling it up was difficult.
Great content, well structured and presented! Excellent!
“well structured”…I see what you did there ;)
You guys are absolutely killing it
Kudos. You guys are so professional and so generous with your time in sharing your knowledge and vision. If I was 40 years younger I would beg to work with you.
Awesome follow up to the last video on wing design. Loved learning about the thought process behind Hollow Grid, in depth. Great stuff!
"Structural Divergence" is suddenly my favorite way of saying the wings broke off.
Add to that “thermal excursion” as a way to say the airplane started on fire.
On the manufacturing topic, could you give us some insight into how the hollow grid is bonded to the skin? Specifically how you can count on that in a tank application..
Love these videos, incredible content.
Great job guys!!!
Agreed, love the innovative ideas and think this is brilliant for things like control surfaces. But have to admit I am skeptical of that being used as a tank. There is a whole lot of bond area there and if any bit of it fails it will both leak and be inaccessible for repair.
not sure why Im watching this , but you sure make it interesting to see all you put into it. can't wait to see the final product.
Fantastic video! Being a traditional aluminium construction kinda guy, this was extremely educational. Looking forward to the next one already.
Great content, love your clean whiteboard sketches.
Outstanding presentation and narration, clear, concise explanations of technical, engineering and fabrication matters. Subscribed.
Thank you for checking out the video! We appreciate the kind words too. :)
Phenomenal video! I wish I had seen this one year ago before I designed the airfoils structure on our FSAE car. Going to pass this video on to my classmates.
That was a treat. Lately, I too am using carbon fiber (foam cored) sandich panels, CNC cut to manufacture the internal structure of an aircraft. I second that the benefits of that approach being no-tool, large stock, easy design change, are extremely undervalued.
This was incredibly well explained and you're a very good speaker! I'd heard of the DarkAero but wasn't really following it, I watched this out of pure engineering curiosity. Definitely interested in hearing more.
Just amazing, thank you so much! I don't recall ever been that captivated for something that technical before
Big Burt Rutan fan here. This generation it’s Dark Aero. Nicely done fellas.👍🏽👍🏽
I really appreciate your hand drawn stuff.
Thoughts about the very linear stress strain curve of carbon fibre? I am a structural engineer - in seismic engineering we use the non linear section of the stress strain curve (from yield to ultimate) to dissipate seismic energy (hysteresis - ie with steel ultimate strain is ~2.5x yield). This allows us to design for lower seismic force level and we intentionally let the building go non linear to dissipate energy - with the primary intent to prevent collapse (and the building is also not likely useable after a design seismic event).
In the high performance sailing world, I think this has been one of the fundamental issues with CF. They are hitting yield loads followed quicly by structural failure because of the lack of a yield plateau (there is no ductilty). Do not know how the aeronautical codes are written but IMO, use of carbon fibre probably needs higher factor of safety in comparison to say aluminum. With CF you basically cannot afford to go past yield...
Brilliant work and excellent video.
Love you guys. Because of you I can understand how to make a good design as a erospace engineer student
Apprendre comment construire son propre avion est bien . Compliments pour le cours très instructif
your presentation is getting better! Much more prone to keep watching; doesnt feel too slow as some have felt
Fascinating. Love your guys work
Wow, Carbon Composite magic... Nice to see you in the future of aircraft being done this way.
Never before appreciated the nuance of an I-beam the way you describe.
I love the videos. Would love to get some updates on testing. Like what's the progress, is there rough timeline for first flight, etc.
Brilliantly concise explanation!
Are there any other commercial or military aircraft that use a hollow grid?
Very intelligent engineering related to manufacturing simplicity. That was your biggest achievement. Smooth and deliberate presentation of information. I love the hollow grid design, it is more organic and this should be the direction taken psychologically with all engineering and architectural thought processes. Well done gentleman, I will take your course as it sounds like great FUN ! And it may give me new insight to precast, aerated concrete panels inlaid with an organic matrix. Thankyou.
I need one. Can't wait to place an order.
Thanks for a very clear explanation. You're an excellent teacher. Definitely want to hear how you're building this. Subscribed.
That’s how Lear jet did their wing in the 60’s. They used that on all models but the 40 &70 series. Rather than a main spar and an aft spar, they went with 8 “spars” and the entire wing is one fuel tank.
Thanks for a great overview of your design. How does an all composite structure handle a lightning strike without shattering?
I'm curious how you are bonding to the wing skins -- are you using a jig to secure the shear webs for bonding? How are you guaranteeing the quality of the bond fillets between webs and upper and lower skins?
Great approach to strength weight ratio
I’m curious if any NDT process is done behind the scenes?
Thank you for your detailed explanation!
I have one question: how does your wing structure accomodates torsion?
I mean, classical wingbox (the front spar, the rear spar, the skin between) is used for torsion stiffness also.
Is the same approach in your structure (the front and the rear spars are stronger than other)?
Great video, and you are selfless in what you share. Another reason we should be moving away from ribs and spars, is that they are an outdated function. They were needed to take mechanical loads when we had cloth wing skins! Now we have wing skins with serious stiffness/weight properties, we really don't need them so much! Yes theres shear to deal with and face collapse, but i love your design. Be really interested to know how you connect the cell spars to the upper wing skin when you close the structure, how do you know the glue is touching? :) Cheers from UK
Absolutely excellent video. Your methods and design techniques are very impressive.
Great information, really enjoy the technical side of design.
Loving these videos, thanks for digging into the engineering
Excellent presentation !
I'm interested in knowing if having an incompressible fluid filling the wing produces any changes in how the wing performs under the same test loads and flexing. Could the fuel load the internal structures and possibly separate the ribs from the skin?
Chances are low that i will build my own airplane (except a small one out of paper) , but i really enjoy your vids.
Very informative and a joy to watch.
Well done!
You guys are amazing! Cant wait to see this fly.. 🙂
For these thin walled structures the failure mode would inevitably be local buckling on the compression side but I can't seem to find any robust mathematical framework to predict this buckling. Also what should the spacing and configuration of the ribs be? Can you point me in the right direction? thanks
@DarkAeroInc Genuine question: Wouldn't it be better to distribute the spars keeping equal celular volume instead of equal distance in between spars? On your approach, it seems like the denser and stiffer part of the wing is towards the trailing edge. Was it deliberate?
How do you apply the gray fuel coating before assembly?
How challenging was it to calculate the stresses on the Hollow Grid design using either manual or computed aided methods?
Almost certainly easier, assuming You obtain the velocity/pressure distribution over the airfoil at several important angles of attack.
It is simpler to integrate loads to multiple shear webs, and wing skin cells, than over an entire wing, flowing to a single spar which is constrained in placement due to thickness, and location of the Aerodynamic center.
Another good one! Whens the homebuilt engineering class start?
I like the term "structural divergence", reminds me of SpaceX's term "rapid unscheduled disassembly".
Nice video. I got interested about your hollow grid concept. Did you analyze the possible failure modes associated to having such a thin sandwich shear webs. I'm particularly worried about debonding in the T joint (between shear web and skin). How did you address this problem.
How do you bond the ribs to the wing? It seems that detail would be key. Edge bonding seems dubious. Some unseen flange detail?
Lovely explanation!
excellent info and you manage to fit it all on one whiteboard!
Can’t wait for the manufacturering video, great video 👍
Is this a top skin that is then epoxied to a bottom skin (after adding reinforcement sandwiches)? If so, how where you able to epoxy the front leading edges to one another when the material layed up is so thin? Are you gluing a thin edge to a thin edge?
Hello, very nice design, I deal with carbon strucures as well even thow not in the aero field, and One of the issues I have to face Is brittleness of carbon strucures. How do you deal with that for instance to avoid cracks from impact with birds?
This is really sick stuff, innovative, different. Interesting thing I noted about y’alls hollow core concept is that something similar is has been used in some 3D printing RC airplane designs too, going as far as to place stingers at angles to the width span of the wings. Its all fascinating
A similar design is used in fighter jet wings also. One that comes to mind, is the F-104. Where compressed bleed air from the engine was sent outboard through the wing, and emerged from ports precisely located to blow air over the flaps when deployed. "Blown flaps" as they were called, reduced approach speeds significantly as long as the engine was kept spooled up and compressing plenty of bleed air. Losing the engine in this configuration, when landing, was unrecoverable. Such were the 1950s.
I have a project that I am working on... using a laminate consisting of 2x2 twill, 10oz triaxial and 5 harness. About 10 plys... what is a good feed rate / pass thickness amd plunge for the CNC? Thanks in advance
I assume that there will not be a "tank" in the wing or a bladder in the wing for the fuel. As the chambers inside your grid wing are quite small, how are you managing fuel flow and scavenging inside the wing? Are there small holes in the grid to allow flow but limit sloshing of the fuel.
Fantastic video! Thank you for sharing!
When do you hope to get a Test Pilot to begin their Inspection and Test Flights?
Love this content. Thank you. I heard about galvanic corrosion problems joining carbon fiber to metal. So many issues. Great job.
I really enjoy the videos of your progress. I do understand your reason for your design; however, do you guys think that you might design a slightly slower plane with a lower stall speed in the future? I think it would be awesome if you could use the same format with interchangeable wings to keep your cost down. Just a thought. I'm a new pilot and have no business in a plane with thin wings and a high stall speed. I'm sure a lot of new pilots would agree (or at least should agree) you could hit both sides of the sales. just a thought. I can't wait to see the final product. Good Luck!!
Ive noticed you have plenty of click bonds in the middle of the wing, do you use those to actually mount the wing to the fuselage??
The wing is structurally joined to the fuselage with four large bolts (two on each side of the wing). There are a bunch of Click Bond nutplates on the forward and aft edges of the bottom wing skin that tie it to the bottom skin of the fuselage. There are a few other Click Bond studs used to support the sump tank and fuel lines.
Hi
Am I right in thinking that the DC-3's wing was designed along similar principles? (In metal of course).
I just wondering how much flaps can hold the wind speed, are you using fly by wire or just normal wire?
You finally answered my question with this video.
Another great video!
Did you consider ride quality in your analysis. I.e., the contribution of aeroelasticity to gust damping?
Are there any numbers on wing lifespan? What about a stronger wing meant to withstand higher loads in any plans?
Awesome video once again guys !! Thank you 🙏
Thanks for sharing!
Well somethimes the best overal design is not only the 'best' functionally; for example in therms of weight or mechanical strength.
Often manufacturability, serviceability, and availability, supply chain (availability of technique) and cost play an important factor too. I wonder how you guys at DarkAero made the full trade off, for example; Is the 5% weight reduction now worth 2x the cost in manufacturing?
Lets say one damages its left wing against a hanger door; can this be repaired without bringing the full structure back to DarkAero? Or is there a common understanding if this Honeycomb.
Excellent presentation.