Just a (sad and tragic) aside: In 68, Lotus did the 56 and they inscribe three cars to the Indy 500 for Joe Leonard, Jim Clark and Graham Hill. Clark did tested the car, but he perish in the Formula 2 race in Hockenheim. He was replaced by Mike Spence. He did well on qualification, but on May 7th, precisely a month after Clark's death, Spence crashed at turn 2 of the Brickyard, a tyre detached and hited his head, killing him.
Such a sad story, but unfortunately typical of that time. At least Chapman would have mourned them both, unlike a certain Enzo Ferrari, who saw most of the team's drivers as just another part of the car. 😓
Lotus did the turbine car at the 500. But as a pilot I wouldn't be within 10 kilometers of a field of turbine, let alone jet (thrust powered) cars. It'd FOR SURE watch it on TV though. Do it FIA.
There's one possibility you missed, Josh. A gas turbine can be used as an electrical generator. If you then use the generated electricity to power, say, a set of hub motors, via a modestly sized battery pack/capacitor bank (to provide buffering), and it would be very possible to build a working racecar. Maybe not an F1 car - current regs outlaw the use of gas turbines, so a rulechange would be needed - but if somebody wanted to set up a true zero emissions race series without worrying about battery limitations, this would be one way to do it, as gas turbines can run on pretty much anything that will burn, including 100% ethanol, or other Biofuels. Sure, using gas turbines to power a car directly may not work, but indirectly? That has possibilities...
Turbines have history in Sports Car racing too [Lemans] but to me perhaps the most intriguing never to race was Chrysler's "Patriot" they dreamt up for Lemans. Talk about being ahead of it's time... LNG powered turbine to juice up the electric motor and a composite 147 pound flywheel to help it out of the corners. I would love to have seen it on track just because... well because thats a COOL idea!!! LOL
@@landiahillfarm6590 nah it’s just that as the right proper French guy that I am, I’m getting tired of seeing this respectable name butchered by everyone, it’s not against you personally. I just wanted you to know as I said.
@@Sauci55on Mes excuses, mon ami. You are right. Believe me when I tell you that to visit Le Mans has been a lifelong dream of mine since I was just a boy, and that was a LONG long time ago. I revere it as one of the cradles of motor racing and cathedrals of my lifelong passion for racing
@@landiahillfarm6590 I hope you get to experience it one day, I was lucky enough to be there in 2022 (easier for me though obviously) and it’s a fantastic event.
Turbine engines don't do well with quick changes to speed. Because of the turbo, While F1 uses gimmick to keep the turbo at speed to prevent lag this isn't possible with turboshaft engines because the turbo is the engine, not something bolted on. However CV transmissions have come a long way and they are great for an engine that likes to keep at the same speed. I can envision an F1 car where the gas pedal has nothing to do with the gas, but changes the gear ratio of the CV transition with the engine running at a near steady RPM. This would be similar to turboprop aircraft where pilots change the thrust not by giving the engine more or less gas but by changing the pitch of the props. A helicopter works that same way, the engine speed is constant and all the pilots controls do is alter the pitch of the rotors blades.
I guess propulsion doesn't need to be the force from the engine rather than to do the normal thing than to spin the crankshaft but then that begs the question: how the hell would a jet engine spin the crankshaft?
@@brendan7591 actually that's a normal thing to do! For jet engines to work you already need to spin the turbines that spin the compressors, if you add an aditional shaft (or extend one from the turbines) you already have a power shaft ouput. Look "turboshaft" engines, small aircrafts, big helicopters and power stations use them. Instead of making the exaust gas go very fast to get thrust, you take all the energy from them (as with a turbo) to move something.
Just like ships using turbines as a means of propulsion... the term "jet engine" (aka turbojet/turbofan) is a bit misleading here. Chrysler actually developed a road car powered by a gas turbine in the early 1960s, production was rather limited but a few are still around today. A more recent example, produced in much greater numbers, would be the M1 Abrams tank which is also powered by a gas turbine rather than a diesel engine. Of course, real "jet engines" have also been used in "cars"... some dragsters and speed record breaking vehicles were powered by turbojets (the Bonneville jet wars).
Funny, I know a video game franchise from Nintendo that perfectly encapsulates what racing Formula One cars with jet engines would feel like. It starts with an F and rhymes with hero. 😆
The only gas-turbine powered racing vehicle I can imagine working is if its used like a diesel-electric train style "hybrid" OR a oval racer. Won't stop me from trying them in sims though since they are fun, if nigh useless. Unless you count tractor pulling as a race, slapping 4 gas turbines to a tractor and dragging them is amazing to see, but ear shattering.
Jet powered CVT electric electric engine. It's a mouth full but could work. Would it sound good? More like at a jet engines toy plane I assume? 0% reusable for road cars.
@@thewuff66 For now. Give the technology several iterations in a race context, along with the tech transfers between teams and slowly finding more real world applications will eventually allow the technology to trickle down.
Can you imagine (wait for it ...) a Turbine Hybrid? The electric motor sorting the turbine lag? Though I dunno, the way things have advanced, would throttle lag still be an issue? As for those who laugh at turbine cars, remember that they are throwing turboshaft engines in motorcycles nowadays (see the MTT Y2K, for example). Tis a crazy world.
I thought the same. Also Williams already had a gearbox with infinite gears allowing the engine to run in it's sweet spot all of the time. That combined with a potent hybrid system should work.
Great video. I think another reason they aren’t used is because of the transient time it takes to create the power even if you can generate more power with a turbo jet it can’t be toggled up and down as quickly. Also the may these are built you need space for a long shaft connecting the compressor and turbine which is space that just doesn’t exist in f1 cares today.
@@theairaccumulator7144 From what I've obsevered Toyota has been doing with some of their cars using Hydrogen, they seem to sound no different then regular Fueled cars.
Read a thing about it in GP Racing magazine. Although Fittipaldi wasn't fond of it at the time, he's since said it could have been developed into a title winner. Quite what they'd have needed to do with it or what regulations might have been needed to be loosened to allow it to unleash its full potential, is another matter.
Turbines could be combined with other innovations over the years for some insane performance. Turbine-CVT and Turbine-Electric would allow you to keep the turbine at a consistent and optimal speed for power and efficiency while having the benefits of the specific transmission. Back in 2012, we had blown diffusers in F1 where engines would be pinned at 100% all the time to generate a higher pressure differential on the diffuser. Heck, I can see a world where you use a turbine as a "fan" á la the Brabham BT46 to supercharge the venturi effect.
Turbine engines are an interesting source of mechanical force, already duccesfully used in land vehicles, but in order to be fully exploited in race-like conditions, they need an hybrid system... -They can work as batteries and provide (a lot of) energy to electric motors. -They need an MGU-H like thing to contrast their unresponsive nature. -A CVT transmission could also be a solution.
F1 needs to relax the rules on engines, brakes and suspension so we can away from esoteric aerodynamic changes being the major differentiator between cars. The teams themselves barely understand the effect of aero changes, your average fan is baffled. Let the manufacturers innovative in areas which actually matter. Put some ridiculously low limit on fuel and see what happens.
Personally i love the sound of the 2018 to 2021 cars, specially the honda engines in 2019 and the mercedes in 2018. Sucks that they got rid of the external waste gate which made those cars sound good
I think the three biggest questions that kinda get in the way of a Jet-Engined F1 car is Feasibility, Weight and Cost. How feasible is it to make work, how much would it weigh (after all, weight is everything in F1) and how much would it cost? Lets remember that we are still in inflationville right now so you can forget "Cheap" as an option right off the bat.
Hydroplanes and Offshore Ocean Racers are doing fine with Turbines. And the way you solve Turbine Lag is add an Afterburner. Just imagine the start with 20 cars with Afterburners....... ;-)
The main issue with turbines is efficiency. Turbines are more powerdense than piston engines, but you trade off efficiency. When you're fuel limited and you don't need a bazillion horsepower because you're trying to do something that goes against nature (helicopters, boats going 60 knots), a reciprocating piston engine is a better choice.
I actually wish they would bring back pit stops for fuel. Take away some horsepower so that as the race goes on, the cars go faster as they use up fuel. How it was before. And allow them to use any of the tire options in the races. I like the point system Qualification I wish was just back to being 1 hour so that you have what you got. Rather than 12 laps. I’d say go out as much as you want but you have 1 hour.
This is why, if you decide to use a jet turbine, you need a fully electric drivetrain. The turbine would do what it does best, while the electric motors would put the power down
A jet engine in a Formula One car? I suppose the best thing we have would be the Formula DS. 700,000 hp, god knows how much torque, and unrealistic amounts downforce. And you get a tonne of fun
I don't care if it was a failure or a success. Having the opportunity to witness something like that at indy would be amazing. In the world of health and safety, regulations and efficiency of today we will never get to witness something quite like this prancing around a racetrack ever again
No they didn't. V10s became mandatory in 2000. You're talking about the late 80s when the 3.5L rules initially mandated a V8. That's when Ferrari pulled their Indycar-based blackmail.
The 2 biggest problems with turbine cars is cost and turbines prefer cool weather to work at their most efficient and the weather very rarely plays ball.
Honestly I couldn't care less for the noise. However, I also couldn't care less for the regulations being so tight. What would be wrong with "max fuel flow: x"?
Why on earth was the Lotus jetcar performing better in the wet than in the dry? Also jet engines are probably banned for the same reason as rotary engines and refueling: Its bad for the environment.
You can buy jet engines that can fit in the palm of your hand nowadays why not strap a few on instead of drs, start winding up the turbine when you hit a detection zone it'd be f***ing hilarious watching someone like Logan Sargent trying to hang on to one of those when it kicks in 😂
I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 250k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
As a beginner investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable. Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of information can be a big hurdle. I've been making more than $100k passively by just investing through an advisor, and I don't have to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my finances remain secure. So I really don't blame people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
Josh: *Promises vid on Lawson and Riccardo*
Also Josh: "Turbines!!"
Take another look at what he said and just wait a few days
Turbines are cooler tho
Just a (sad and tragic) aside:
In 68, Lotus did the 56 and they inscribe three cars to the Indy 500 for Joe Leonard, Jim Clark and Graham Hill. Clark did tested the car, but he perish in the Formula 2 race in Hockenheim. He was replaced by Mike Spence. He did well on qualification, but on May 7th, precisely a month after Clark's death, Spence crashed at turn 2 of the Brickyard, a tyre detached and hited his head, killing him.
Such a sad story, but unfortunately typical of that time. At least Chapman would have mourned them both, unlike a certain Enzo Ferrari, who saw most of the team's drivers as just another part of the car. 😓
Josh: Why don't F1 cars use jet engines
aarava: Because it would burn the shed down
Oh come on. Not again. We just finished rebuilding the thing
Master, let us out from the shed please.
@aarava
Liam Lawson, once again, being asked to wait to get his moment
Lotus did the turbine car at the 500. But as a pilot I wouldn't be within 10 kilometers of a field of turbine, let alone jet (thrust powered) cars. It'd FOR SURE watch it on TV though. Do it FIA.
Fernando: Even if we fit a rocket ship, we’ll still be P18
I think Richard Hammond would be against jet engines in anything tbf
Or electric.
Or petrol.
Saying that’s he’s crashed everything.
There's one possibility you missed, Josh. A gas turbine can be used as an electrical generator. If you then use the generated electricity to power, say, a set of hub motors, via a modestly sized battery pack/capacitor bank (to provide buffering), and it would be very possible to build a working racecar. Maybe not an F1 car - current regs outlaw the use of gas turbines, so a rulechange would be needed - but if somebody wanted to set up a true zero emissions race series without worrying about battery limitations, this would be one way to do it, as gas turbines can run on pretty much anything that will burn, including 100% ethanol, or other Biofuels. Sure, using gas turbines to power a car directly may not work, but indirectly? That has possibilities...
Turbines have history in Sports Car racing too [Lemans] but to me perhaps the most intriguing never to race was Chrysler's "Patriot" they dreamt up for Lemans. Talk about being ahead of it's time... LNG powered turbine to juice up the electric motor and a composite 147 pound flywheel to help it out of the corners. I would love to have seen it on track just because... well because thats a COOL idea!!! LOL
Just so you know, it’s Le Mans.
@@Sauci55on oh we’re feeling sassy aren’t we! lol
@@landiahillfarm6590 nah it’s just that as the right proper French guy that I am, I’m getting tired of seeing this respectable name butchered by everyone, it’s not against you personally. I just wanted you to know as I said.
@@Sauci55on Mes excuses, mon ami. You are right. Believe me when I tell you that to visit Le Mans has been a lifelong dream of mine since I was just a boy, and that was a LONG long time ago. I revere it as one of the cradles of motor racing and cathedrals of my lifelong passion for racing
@@landiahillfarm6590 I hope you get to experience it one day, I was lucky enough to be there in 2022 (easier for me though obviously) and it’s a fantastic event.
faster than an alpine here
Yeah that's not hard
Ironically a blue Renault holds the land speed record for turbine powered cars
R.I.P Surfshark sponsorship, you will be missed
But wait🤔😳
Weird Liam Lawson vid.
A few more days he indicated
If you want to use a Turbine of any kind in a race car, you'd have to design the engine from the ground up, and not buy a PT6 and hope it does well
Turbine engines don't do well with quick changes to speed. Because of the turbo, While F1 uses gimmick to keep the turbo at speed to prevent lag this isn't possible with turboshaft engines because the turbo is the engine, not something bolted on.
However CV transmissions have come a long way and they are great for an engine that likes to keep at the same speed. I can envision an F1 car where the gas pedal has nothing to do with the gas, but changes the gear ratio of the CV transition with the engine running at a near steady RPM. This would be similar to turboprop aircraft where pilots change the thrust not by giving the engine more or less gas but by changing the pitch of the props. A helicopter works that same way, the engine speed is constant and all the pilots controls do is alter the pitch of the rotors blades.
"Why don't F1 cars use jet engines?" Is it because they have a potential to burn other cars following them..? 😅
I guess propulsion doesn't need to be the force from the engine rather than to do the normal thing than to spin the crankshaft but then that begs the question: how the hell would a jet engine spin the crankshaft?
@@brendan7591 actually that's a normal thing to do! For jet engines to work you already need to spin the turbines that spin the compressors, if you add an aditional shaft (or extend one from the turbines) you already have a power shaft ouput. Look "turboshaft" engines, small aircrafts, big helicopters and power stations use them. Instead of making the exaust gas go very fast to get thrust, you take all the energy from them (as with a turbo) to move something.
Just like ships using turbines as a means of propulsion... the term "jet engine" (aka turbojet/turbofan) is a bit misleading here.
Chrysler actually developed a road car powered by a gas turbine in the early 1960s, production was rather limited but a few are still around today. A more recent example, produced in much greater numbers, would be the M1 Abrams tank which is also powered by a gas turbine rather than a diesel engine.
Of course, real "jet engines" have also been used in "cars"... some dragsters and speed record breaking vehicles were powered by turbojets (the Bonneville jet wars).
but the exhaust gases could be turned upwards, creating downwards pressure along with it
@@ISirSmokea blown diffuser or venturi tunnel might be a better solution, but who knows
A Turboshaft Engine is not a Jet Engine. A Turboshaft engine generates Power at an output SHAFT. A Jet generates thrust with its exhaust Jet
Thinking exactly the same thing
Mechanical engineer here. I came here to say the exact same thing, but you beat me to it.
I just shat myself
Another great video, cheers from France mate !
Funny, I know a video game franchise from Nintendo that perfectly encapsulates what racing Formula One cars with jet engines would feel like. It starts with an F and rhymes with hero. 😆
The only gas-turbine powered racing vehicle I can imagine working is if its used like a diesel-electric train style "hybrid" OR a oval racer.
Won't stop me from trying them in sims though since they are fun, if nigh useless.
Unless you count tractor pulling as a race, slapping 4 gas turbines to a tractor and dragging them is amazing to see, but ear shattering.
Jet powered CVT electric electric engine. It's a mouth full but could work. Would it sound good? More like at a jet engines toy plane I assume? 0% reusable for road cars.
@@thewuff66 For now. Give the technology several iterations in a race context, along with the tech transfers between teams and slowly finding more real world applications will eventually allow the technology to trickle down.
"Whatever LSD hangover induced creations could be cooked up..." Please look up Smokey Yunick Indy Sidecar to see how crazy things could get! :P
I feel positive that somewhere along the Line, LSD in itself was allowed with how many contraptions turned up at Indy for a while.
Can you imagine (wait for it ...) a Turbine Hybrid? The electric motor sorting the turbine lag? Though I dunno, the way things have advanced, would throttle lag still be an issue? As for those who laugh at turbine cars, remember that they are throwing turboshaft engines in motorcycles nowadays (see the MTT Y2K, for example). Tis a crazy world.
I thought the same. Also Williams already had a gearbox with infinite gears allowing the engine to run in it's sweet spot all of the time.
That combined with a potent hybrid system should work.
Haha that's the real turbo hybrid
Great video. I think another reason they aren’t used is because of the transient time it takes to create the power even if you can generate more power with a turbo jet it can’t be toggled up and down as quickly. Also the may these are built you need space for a long shaft connecting the compressor and turbine which is space that just doesn’t exist in f1 cares today.
Didn't have this video on my Josh bingo card....
Imagine Gran Turismo's X2010 in real life....
While its electric, there is a small real life equilevent that has displayed how terrifyingly effective a Modern day fan car can be: The Mcmurtry
This was a *brilliant* Idea for a sponsored video and even if it was already planned before they sponsorship it wotked out *brilliant*- ly
Why F1 doesnt make the switch to hydrogen engines instead of increasing the electric power? That should be the question.
Easy answer, you need someone who builds engines also interested in Hydrogen power. Right now it seems biofuel is more popular.
@@Appletank8 also hydrogen is energy poor and impractical to store. It also doesn't make noise. They'd go full EV before going to hydrogen.
@@theairaccumulator7144 Technically Hydrogen Combustion Engine would make noise, but that'd be even more inefficient than Fuel Cells.
@@theairaccumulator7144 From what I've obsevered Toyota has been doing with some of their cars using Hydrogen, they seem to sound no different then regular Fueled cars.
Hydrogen makes more sense with all-electric power, hence why Extreme E is transitioning to Extreme H.
Read a thing about it in GP Racing magazine. Although Fittipaldi wasn't fond of it at the time, he's since said it could have been developed into a title winner. Quite what they'd have needed to do with it or what regulations might have been needed to be loosened to allow it to unleash its full potential, is another matter.
This ain't the video we were waiting for Josh
2:21 Those unifroms! 😂
Turbines could be combined with other innovations over the years for some insane performance.
Turbine-CVT and Turbine-Electric would allow you to keep the turbine at a consistent and optimal speed for power and efficiency while having the benefits of the specific transmission.
Back in 2012, we had blown diffusers in F1 where engines would be pinned at 100% all the time to generate a higher pressure differential on the diffuser.
Heck, I can see a world where you use a turbine as a "fan" á la the Brabham BT46 to supercharge the venturi effect.
Turbine engines are an interesting source of mechanical force, already duccesfully used in land vehicles, but in order to be fully exploited in race-like conditions, they need an hybrid system...
-They can work as batteries and provide (a lot of) energy to electric motors.
-They need an MGU-H like thing to contrast their unresponsive nature.
-A CVT transmission could also be a solution.
Because there is more than one car racing at a time?
F1 needs to relax the rules on engines, brakes and suspension so we can away from esoteric aerodynamic changes being the major differentiator between cars. The teams themselves barely understand the effect of aero changes, your average fan is baffled. Let the manufacturers innovative in areas which actually matter. Put some ridiculously low limit on fuel and see what happens.
Most sane Josh Revell video title
Personally i love the sound of the 2018 to 2021 cars, specially the honda engines in 2019 and the mercedes in 2018. Sucks that they got rid of the external waste gate which made those cars sound good
awesome video
I think the three biggest questions that kinda get in the way of a Jet-Engined F1 car is Feasibility, Weight and Cost. How feasible is it to make work, how much would it weigh (after all, weight is everything in F1) and how much would it cost? Lets remember that we are still in inflationville right now so you can forget "Cheap" as an option right off the bat.
Perhaps the history of Eifelland and its interesting designer could be on the table as an idea in the future.
Well I didn't expect this at all
Hydroplanes and Offshore Ocean Racers are doing fine with Turbines. And the way you solve Turbine Lag is add an Afterburner. Just imagine the start with 20 cars with Afterburners....... ;-)
I mean, Cyber Formula had Jet Engines and that was awesome to see, even though it’s an anime and only used as boosters on high speed sections
Woooooaahhh feels weird for a Josh Revell video not to be sponsored by Surfshark
I’m sure the Shark will return
The main issue with turbines is efficiency. Turbines are more powerdense than piston engines, but you trade off efficiency. When you're fuel limited and you don't need a bazillion horsepower because you're trying to do something that goes against nature (helicopters, boats going 60 knots), a reciprocating piston engine is a better choice.
0:22 what is this background music ? Thanks
I think you just need different tracks for it to work, think like Wipeout or F-Zero.
I actually wish they would bring back pit stops for fuel. Take away some horsepower so that as the race goes on, the cars go faster as they use up fuel. How it was before. And allow them to use any of the tire options in the races.
I like the point system
Qualification I wish was just back to being 1 hour so that you have what you got. Rather than 12 laps. I’d say go out as much as you want but you have 1 hour.
Wonderful. Now- the Lawson video..?
Josh you've gone insane
I have always found this story so interesting
You fp1will and ricks f1 addiction have to collab
One of the AIX F2 cars has one, or one that goes just as fast
I see the break is going well.
I would give it more chance if you use the turbine to spin a generator, which then either powers the wheels or charges a battery
My immediate thought was throttle lag, if you can’t keep it wide open it’s going to be shit.
is josh revell out of video ideas
Well yes,
but actually, no.
No this is part of F1 history which many may not be aware of
Yeah seems like a driver61 vid idea
I think this is just simply lovely 😂😂😂
This is why, if you decide to use a jet turbine, you need a fully electric drivetrain. The turbine would do what it does best, while the electric motors would put the power down
In my opinion, F1 engineers would be less likely to use a jet engine as a standalone power plant and more likely to just have it spin a turbo.
02:40 did you say 'abeam the driver'? Nautical or aeronautical?
Actually gas turbines. They use too much fuel. They'll have to refuel during the race.
josh revells gone nuts
For those of you undeterred by all of the drawbacks in this video, look into Jet Car Drag Racing and the Reno Air Race Jet Class.
A jet engine in a Formula One car? I suppose the best thing we have would be the Formula DS. 700,000 hp, god knows how much torque, and unrealistic amounts downforce. And you get a tonne of fun
You’re thinking about big jet engines. The jet engines in use here are turboprop engines used on propeller planes.
I just hope they bring back v10s when they get the sustainable stuff together no reason they can't run a v10 hybrid on sustainable fuels
I don't care if it was a failure or a success. Having the opportunity to witness something like that at indy would be amazing. In the world of health and safety, regulations and efficiency of today we will never get to witness something quite like this prancing around a racetrack ever again
Waiting for a Kalle Rovanperä video
Because they are not 3yo kids going like : “I want jet engines in my car and an iron man suit for the pilot”
I haven't watched the video yet, let me guess the answer.
Safety?
Talks about regulation change to v10 fails to acknowledge that applied to every one except Ferrari how blackmailed there way to keep the v12
No they didn't. V10s became mandatory in 2000. You're talking about the late 80s when the 3.5L rules initially mandated a V8. That's when Ferrari pulled their Indycar-based blackmail.
If we have it will become Cyber Formula
The 2 biggest problems with turbine cars is cost and turbines prefer cool weather to work at their most efficient and the weather very rarely plays ball.
We thought you meant Lawson's video
Honestly I couldn't care less for the noise.
However, I also couldn't care less for the regulations being so tight. What would be wrong with "max fuel flow: x"?
We would have WipeOut 2048 without the Anti Gravity being the factor.
0:51 1:07 5:30 5:31
The better idea nowa days is to have the turbine drive a generator... Maybe with a parallel system for higher speeds.
A gas turbine generator with an electric power train would work.
In 2014 _Formula 1_ became _2 Formulaic_ and the fans knew it.
"What if, for the sake of argument, you were completely insane. In 1966, an American-"
Oh no.
You know the "Insane" part is gonna be good when it involves an American in the 1960s.
Why on earth was the Lotus jetcar performing better in the wet than in the dry?
Also jet engines are probably banned for the same reason as rotary engines and refueling: Its bad for the environment.
Because it had four wheel drive and smooth power delivery.
The real question is why don't airplanes use turbos
Same reason why you don't pull pants down when going to pee.
4 week break already hitting f1 fans hard
Why not nuclear reactor? Just one PU for 350 years (possibly more)
As of the current technology, nuclear fission reactors do not scale down well to acceptable power/weight ratios for racing use.
Damnn 20 seconds ago is crazy
No lie, i thought the thumbnail was one of those shitpost community posts 😂
Pair them with electric engines and never cry about turbolag again
hear my out... hybrid jet enige :p dumping exces energy in a battery for instand delivery. problem fixed
You can buy jet engines that can fit in the palm of your hand nowadays why not strap a few on instead of drs, start winding up the turbine when you hit a detection zone it'd be f***ing hilarious watching someone like Logan Sargent trying to hang on to one of those when it kicks in 😂
I have one reason: Richard Hammond
Oooh turbine cars - one of my favourite automotive dead ends!
because
Id use Thor's hammer too power my f1 car
You would likely end up with an entire paddock of 2012 Spanish GP Williams F1 garages. Nobody wants that.
Hamilton used in Brazil, 2021😅
Because it's against the rules. [smash cut to credits]
Because "we would still be 11th"
I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 250k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks or Crypto will be appreciated.
As a beginner investor, it’s essential for you to have a mentor to keep you accountable.
Ruth Ann Tsakonas is my trade analyst, she has guided me to identify key market trends, pinpointed strategic entry points, and provided risk assessments, ensuring my trades decisions align with market dynamics for optimal returns.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Ruth Ann Tsakonas, for her expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
I don't really blame people who panic. Lack of
information can be a big hurdle. I've been
making more than $100k passively by just
investing through an advisor, and I don't have
to do much work. Inflation or no inflation, my
finances remain secure. So I really don't blame
people who panic.
Without a doubt! Ruth Ann Tsakonas is a trader who goes above and beyond. she has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. Her strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
nice! once you hit a big milestone, the next comes easier. How can i reach her, if you don't mind me asking?
k
Why they don't use jet engines is because they haven't figured out how to put the tacks in the air 🤣🤣