Mr. Mosley - from Downton Abbey to Gresham College. Well done! Actually, I enjoyed this. This also explains why I am a Civil Engineer and not Electrical.
and the nice thing about v e to the st is that it spells vest. also, it is probably wiser to engage the radiologist in discrete fourier transforms than it is to regale the traffic sergeant with the heisenberg uncertainty principle. 🙂
@@TaunoErik You're right-wow, I didn't know. I had never seen the IEC symbol till today; always used the ANSI/IEEE one. Now I'm disappointed-but not surprised-that electrical engineering has multiple conflicting standards ... _even when it's NOT a metric-vs-Imperial issue._ 😢
Appallingly bad. The speaker starts by saying how challenging integral transforms are, then descends into a perfectly arcane, obscure and narrowly focused technical lecture that demonstrates how transforms are used in electronics, not what they are. Sadly Richard is a perfect example of why mathematics is so misunderstood by the general community
I thought he did a pretty decent job explaining integral transforms in an accessible way, without alienating people who don't have a ton of mathematical background. It's not easy to strike that balance. My only complaint was his reluctance to demystify imaginary numbers. What would you have done differently?
I enjoyed it. What *is* appropriate, in your opinion? I had assumed the criterion was: you're on faculty at Gresham? Cool, you get to give a lecture. Sure, there's probably *some* vetting, but I gather that's the basic premise.
Mr. Mosley - from Downton Abbey to Gresham College. Well done! Actually, I enjoyed this. This also explains why I am a Civil Engineer and not Electrical.
Check out "The Forgotten Genius of Oliver Heaviside: A Maverick of Electrical Science" ~ Basil Mahon
Heaviside was English.
Please fix the spelling in thumbnail.
Intergral?
Wheel tappers! Thanks.
This helped a lot. Thanks 😊
and the nice thing about v e to the st is that it spells vest.
also, it is probably wiser to engage the radiologist in discrete fourier transforms than it is to regale the traffic sergeant with the heisenberg uncertainty principle. 🙂
I'm an engineer, so I understood everything ... except why you didn't use the resistor symbol -ww- to represent the resistor. 🤔
Because -[ ]- is correct resistor symbol here, in Europe!
@@TaunoErik You're right-wow, I didn't know. I had never seen the IEC symbol till today; always used the ANSI/IEEE one.
Now I'm disappointed-but not surprised-that electrical engineering has multiple conflicting standards ... _even when it's NOT a metric-vs-Imperial issue._ 😢
Appallingly bad. The speaker starts by saying how challenging integral transforms are, then descends into a perfectly arcane, obscure and narrowly focused technical lecture that demonstrates how transforms are used in electronics, not what they are. Sadly Richard is a perfect example of why mathematics is so misunderstood by the general community
I thought he did a pretty decent job explaining integral transforms in an accessible way, without alienating people who don't have a ton of mathematical background. It's not easy to strike that balance. My only complaint was his reluctance to demystify imaginary numbers.
What would you have done differently?
Not terribly incisive.
Who thought this was an appropriate lecture? This isn't what people want to see.
I enjoyed it. What *is* appropriate, in your opinion?
I had assumed the criterion was: you're on faculty at Gresham? Cool, you get to give a lecture. Sure, there's probably *some* vetting, but I gather that's the basic premise.