This is definitely a cool idea. I'm a big fan of panning delays and reverbs and tend to do that quite often but having 2 different ones, each panned one side and the other, is a great idea. Stereo delay plugins already share a similar thought process by allowing one to dial in two separate delay times for the left and right. Thanks for sharing.
This is an old 50's and early 60s mixing trick. Take a mono or stereo vocal, split that to two tracks one left, one right, and put different reverbs on each, like a hard plate on one and a extended reverb or echo on the other, than remix those to a single stereo track. Thing is it works spectacularly, The Beatles used this a great deal on vocals in most of their early recordings.
Now in Logic there's even a quicker way to do what You're doing :D You can load a reverb Plugin in Dual Mono and have different settings on left and right channel - Also You can do Mid Side processing within the same plugins :D
There is a great tutorial by VSL on how to take sound, turn it into mono, then re-stereo and power pan the reverb. Look for the hybrid reverb demo I believe. Numerical Sounds also do some amazing work in this area.
No amount of reverb will give you this effect if your balance isn't set right and masking is present. There's a free plugin made by TDR called Proximity which basically lets you play with the depth and position your instruments in the background by using cool delay tricks and it works wonders. Make sure you grab a copy of it.
I cant tell if you're being serious or not (i hope its sarcasm, please let it be sarcasm) but these lyrics pissed me off after 5 seconds and made the video very annoying... other than that... good content
Some similar fx with this idea is to have a stereo synth track, then add two tracks of hard panned L and R channels of the same synth but tuned up and down to match. Add your different reverbs like the video..
Here is a better tip - The mix for the verbs should be 100 percent. Otherwise you start to phase. And also, the times should be different as you will trick the ears to perceive bigger edges....but this brings width, not depth.
phasing itself isnt bad. Idiots just confuse phasing as strictly the combing effect. in reality phasing is useful, especially when it comes to spatialization. show me a single pro mixer who phase aligns overheads with close mics. Otherwise people would record drums with a single mono overhead and then apply an exact ms delay on close mics to minimize phase.
+Jérôme Alexis You are absolutely right! If he has any dry signal coming through the sends, he is actually turning up the center when he increases the send levels. Totally wet aux reverbs would create the desired stereo separation because of the haas effect.
@Je Ro Meo Right... But, it sounds so _good!_ And, @giapada, you're confused. It's an insert, sure. But it's on an Aux track. Typically, when we use inserts (plugins) on an Auxiliary, we would set the wet ratio to 100% to avoid increasing the signal's overall gain. However, there are occasions where you might use less than 100% Wet, such as when you're sending the signal to a Delay.
@Rob Behrens *_Totally wet auxiliary's_** do not create stereo separation **_because_** of the Haas effect.* The Haas effect is related to proximity/distance, not stereo image/width. Adding _delay to one side of the signal,_ in this case, a Reverb, is what creates the Haas effect. Whether the Aux is set from 0-100% is irrelevant. The source material can't delay itself.
hey very creative , i just use a pingpong delay with very low "wet" slider , wehn an echo/delay is so silent it tricks the mind and seems like a very clean reverb ina full mix its almost the same as a reverb . ping pong gives it an interesting texture andf high stereo seperation
I'm going to have to try this. I have Valhalla Vintage Verb & the one that comes with Reaper. I could either use both, or two different instances of the Valhalla.
Interesting tip! Agree others with the not having a 100% mix on the reverb - makes adjusting the sends overly complicated and has potential phase issues. BTW, you're panning the reverb signal. What about panning the aux bus BEFORE it gets fed to the reverb (using some utility plugin to pan) and leave the reverb output as is? If you have a good sounding stereo reverb that works great with stereo input, this might make more sense. Or you could do combination of both!
I spent the whole time watching this wanting you to explain that Synth Piano!! That sounds fantastic. Which VST is it? Could you give me some info getting that sound? If it's a nexus sound, for example, I'd love to hear about the processing you did on it.
Would you also want to take reverb off of the center of the track, like if there was reverb coming from the instrument? Would keeping the reverb coming from the instrument muddy up the track?
create 2 (reverb) sends, pan one left and pan one right. so the reverbs will be in stereo and sound different. So, is the original main vocal totally dry? I means before it goes to sends.
also, we had a problem with logic where a few weeks ago they made a major update to the DAW and space desighner 's over all look. I found that not only the skin of it looked different, we lost our specific sound templates. Now were looking for a new reverb....when I find one can I NOT update it. Once I get familiar with a reverb platform, are updates necessary if I'm happy with what I have?
off topic here but keen on this pro tools theme lol.. if i buy logic X and upgrade my Os to work with it since mine is 10.6.8 would my old plugins work ? hopefully i dont have to reinstall them all?
Hi Thanks For Sharing such a unique concept..... I really THANK YOU and Appreciate ... But Please also tell me that by saying "Creating Aux Sends" you mean to say creating Fx Channel ...Since i am a STUDIO ONE user and i dont get this .. In Studio One you can Create VAC, BUS and Fx only ... Please Help
I want so eagerly to learn this mixing edit music work.. Can u tell me which software is this... Is is Pro Tools or other software.. Is it work on Windows laptop? Pls reply
The reasons for putting your reverb at 100% wet are simple: maximum control over every other channel that shares the same reverb - applies in this context as well because you're talking about not over saturating your mix with reverb. Setting your reverb less than 100% doesn't seem to have a mixing disadvantage but it definitely has a workflow disadvantage which is why it looks weird when you do it. What do you do when you want more out of that same reverb space on another sound? Why do you want dry signal back from an aux send?
Why is that Lead Voice track on stereo? Did u already had some processing on it and then bounced it out of logic and then imported into this session again? If so, do u have any idea of how to bounce a mono audio track as just mono when you bouncing that track, on Logic? This is a cool trick by the way.. Thank you so much!!
not neccesarily sometimes it helps to turn it down. it makes it sound less stronger and sometimes that helps it blend into the mix. sometimes it doesn't.
it doesn't have to be. There are no rules when it comes to mixing. That's how people come up with new sounds. If everyone mixed the same, all mixes would sound exactly alike. You can use an aux gain to turn a reverb up and down, but you can also use your wet/dry knob to change how the reverb is affecting the mix. Try it for yourself and see the difference in how it affects the mix.
What I have Understood from this is That i can Create 2 Sends Channel of reverb each having a differnt type of Reverbs Panned Righ and Left respectively. M i Right?
Great information thank you! A question for you...I'm pretty new to all of this. My recordings are pretty simple, one and two guitars, ambient spaces and playing. Each guitar has three mics and a DI, is there anything wrong with using reverbs on the left and right mics (track 1 and 4 then bouncing down into my tracks? I pan each track left and right and apply the effects to those tracks for the spcious sound will that get me the same effect of 3d as your outlineing here? Thanks for your time~
I really wouldn't classify this as a "trick". Tony Visconti's reverb is a "trick", Hass Effect can be considered a "trick". Here you just split the reverb and put two diff reverbs on either channel. Im sure the reason why you probably don't see this "trick" is cause its not revolutionary, it would be used in rare instance and could really bog down ones workflow when dialing in specific, highly detailed reverb parameters. That and there are several single plugins you could use to get this same effect in a much simpler fashion... Great video quality tho and you gained a subscriber cheers :)
This is exact what you should not do to setup a reverb , if you listen good , the vocal has now a blindspot on the right channel side , its important to keep every sound you edit stable in left en right percent...better turn up freqs on a subtile way in opposite direction ...by exmple left 2db of 1500hz.... right 1530hz on. and by the way if you pan something....doesnt mean that in that position the sound got the right curve for that position ...so adjusting eq is necessary, but tnx for efforts , good luck
Great Tip! One question... When you added the Reverbs, neither were set at 100% Wet. Do you feel like the included Dry signal beefs up the sound a bit more? Are there any other reasons you do that? Awesome video man! You've helped me a lot over the years. More than you know. So thanks again and again!!!
***** what natural feel, man? ok i will explain. lets say you have 50/50 on the wet knob on reverb which is on aux channel. it means that 50% of mure unprocessed signal goes back to your original track and adds to it, altering your gain structure. and now imagine that you want yo put a compressor and/or saturator that can cause latency (and as a result , a phase shift) - it means that some of the signal with altered phase will come back to ur original signal and mess up the phase. and you will get all crazy trying to figure out why this or that doesnt sound right.
***** you can achieve the same feel without sideffects, all im saying. make it 100% wet and dont touch it. now add the send level to the channel to the taste and bam, phase and all that shit is not a headache, move on .
ArmorKingEmir Was just about to say the exact same thing. This may cause a major shitload of phase issues and it's a completely retarded way of doing something really simple...
ArmorKingEmir It's not a question of unimportant, but how does it sounds. I personally don't like that sound on vocals. The reason for that is it's unnatural to my ears. In the real world of psychoacoustics, our hears will never hear in isolation a 100% wet reverb signal (in a normal listening environment.) If a singer is performing in a room like a bathroom, we hear the dry and reverb signals. Regarding the phase issues that you mention below, please see the attached picture links. The phase shift is almost nominal. SENDS ACTIVE i.imgur.com/AJzSRBH.png?1 NO SEND i.imgur.com/qGwav81.png?1
But doesn't this whole principle/method fall apart as soon as you play the song in mono? I mean let's say I make this sweet Tropical House song with panned reverb sends so everything is nice and clean, but then I go to the beach and hit play on my mono beach speaker while chilling - then it sounds muddier as everything has been summed to mono and my reverbs suddenly collide. Sure this method improves the reverb sound, but I wouldn't completely rely on it, I'd rather EQ the reverbs for plain mixing separation purposes and use this method to sweeten the mix for stereo playback. View this method as panning sustained instruments - it's cool but it doesn't help a thing on some systems, and you're better off by improving your skills with the EQ and sound selection.
+steffeeH I believe that's true only if you pan left and right to 100%. With this method to 35% you still can hear the mono and stereo reverb. This is a method that you can use in mixing. but as usually you have to mix in mono too to see how all translates too. so yeah it might not work in mono much, but with extra editing you can get it there without any problem with the method itself !
My new favorite channel for mixing tips and cool techniques. You guys are precise and you explain things very realistically.
I've been using logic for 8 years and these videos are still teaching me things I didn't know. Love the great work. Keep educating us!
The mix controls within the reverb plugins must be set at 100%
I’m confused about this too...
Cool approach I'll try it! Thanks!
This is definitely a cool idea. I'm a big fan of panning delays and reverbs and tend to do that quite often but having 2 different ones, each panned one side and the other, is a great idea. Stereo delay plugins already share a similar thought process by allowing one to dial in two separate delay times for the left and right. Thanks for sharing.
This is an old 50's and early 60s mixing trick. Take a mono or stereo vocal, split that to two tracks one left, one right, and put different reverbs on each, like a hard plate on one and a extended reverb or echo on the other, than remix those to a single stereo track. Thing is it works spectacularly, The Beatles used this a great deal on vocals in most of their early recordings.
Outstanding..
This is one of the best recording tips I've learned on TH-cam....thanks....
Cool trick!
Now in Logic there's even a quicker way to do what You're doing :D
You can load a reverb Plugin in Dual Mono and have different settings on left and right channel - Also You can do Mid Side processing within the same plugins :D
your vids are always so good
Love this one.....you are becoming my favourite teacher
this was a great vid. never thought about doing things this way but seems like a no brainer. thanks!
Nick De Grace Thanks Nick!
There is a great tutorial by VSL on how to take sound, turn it into mono, then re-stereo and power pan the reverb. Look for the hybrid reverb demo I believe. Numerical Sounds also do some amazing work in this area.
gimme link
Super cool technique. Can’t wait to use it on my leads.
Great learning's in your videos ! Stellar job pal
omg that valhalla reverb sounds beautiful
Very nice and useful trick. I'll try this on my tracks.
No amount of reverb will give you this effect if your balance isn't set right and masking is present.
There's a free plugin made by TDR called Proximity which basically lets you play with the depth and position your instruments in the background by using cool delay tricks and it works wonders. Make sure you grab a copy of it.
+Rob Daniels awesome plug-in, thanks for the headsup
Panagement is another one
yeah but they fuck up the phase like nothing else...
Great tutorial. Thanks for the great tips.
what DAW is that it looks like pro tools and logic had a baby
Jerry Mateo Haha basically it is. Logic X with a Pro Tools theme.
Jerry Anthony Mateo hahaha true
***** bro how to get this theme?
+ADSR Music Production Tutorials
omg he was right
+In the DAW lol the number one thing I hate about protools is it's aesthetics, not sure why you like that theme.
A couple years old, but still a Great video!
And wow...Diamonds in the Sky.... Most original lyrics of all time 10/10 :)
I cant tell if you're being serious or not (i hope its sarcasm, please let it be sarcasm) but these lyrics pissed me off after 5 seconds and made the video very annoying... other than that... good content
Some similar fx with this idea is to have a stereo synth track, then add two tracks of hard panned L and R channels of the same synth but tuned up and down to match. Add your different reverbs like the video..
Great video! I love this production technique. Thank you for sharing. I feel like a kid in a candy store :)
This song has a vibe
great thinking,great video
This helped SOOOO MUCH. Thank you.
No problem. Thanks for watching.
Cool technique
good tip
Here is a better tip - The mix for the verbs should be 100 percent. Otherwise you start to phase. And also, the times should be different as you will trick the ears to perceive bigger edges....but this brings width, not depth.
mark dollar 3 years late, I know, but how does it cause phasing ??
phasing itself isnt bad. Idiots just confuse phasing as strictly the combing effect.
in reality phasing is useful, especially when it comes to spatialization.
show me a single pro mixer who phase aligns overheads with close mics. Otherwise people would record drums with a single mono overhead and then apply an exact ms delay on close mics to minimize phase.
Lovely idea.
Very good. Amazing The lesson
This is brilliant!
Amazing video
Thank you !!!! this is what my ears wanted!! really i want to cry!! hahaha
Another great tutorial :)
Don't you think the mix faders on each reverb should be turned to 100%, so we can only hear the "reverb sound" ?
+Jérôme Alexis You are absolutely right! If he has any dry signal coming through the sends, he is actually turning up the center when he increases the send levels. Totally wet aux reverbs would create the desired stereo separation because of the haas effect.
The reverb is an insert in the aux track not an aux track itself, what you say it's right but applies when you use aux/send tracks for reverbs!
@Je Ro Meo
Right... But, it sounds so _good!_
And, @giapada, you're confused. It's an insert, sure. But it's on an Aux track. Typically, when we use inserts (plugins) on an Auxiliary, we would set the wet ratio to 100% to avoid increasing the signal's overall gain. However, there are occasions where you might use less than 100% Wet, such as when you're sending the signal to a Delay.
@Rob Behrens
*_Totally wet auxiliary's_** do not create stereo separation **_because_** of the Haas effect.*
The Haas effect is related to proximity/distance, not stereo image/width. Adding _delay to one side of the signal,_ in this case, a Reverb, is what creates the Haas effect.
Whether the Aux is set from 0-100% is irrelevant. The source material can't delay itself.
@@SomeCollege You're right about everything until the last two words.
hey very creative , i just use a pingpong delay with very low "wet" slider , wehn an echo/delay is so silent it tricks the mind and seems like a very clean reverb ina full mix its almost the same as a reverb . ping pong gives it an interesting texture andf high stereo seperation
dope trick
You can also use sidechain verb. Pretty same principle.
Great trickery, thanks :)
ill try it
I'm going to have to try this. I have Valhalla Vintage Verb & the one that comes with Reaper. I could either use both, or two different instances of the Valhalla.
What was the dimensions of the room u recorded the vocals? What mic? Sounds great.
Where can I get those vocals? :0
They are just insane.
Great tutorial, keep up the good work.
Greetings from Germany :)
Interesting tip! Agree others with the not having a 100% mix on the reverb - makes adjusting the sends overly complicated and has potential phase issues.
BTW, you're panning the reverb signal. What about panning the aux bus BEFORE it gets fed to the reverb (using some utility plugin to pan) and leave the reverb output as is? If you have a good sounding stereo reverb that works great with stereo input, this might make more sense. Or you could do combination of both!
Defeats the purpose. The whole idea is to have two reverbs creating a lush space.
I love it so much
Cool Track!
great tip great
nicee
I spent the whole time watching this wanting you to explain that Synth Piano!! That sounds fantastic. Which VST is it? Could you give me some info getting that sound? If it's a nexus sound, for example, I'd love to hear about the processing you did on it.
real cool! just wonderd how to split a sampel so you got one channel with just rigt and same with right in Fruity loops?
THIS IS A GREAT TUTORIAL!! :) What trick did you employ to get your own custom plugin menu at the very TOP??!!
Would you also want to take reverb off of the center of the track, like if there was reverb coming from the instrument? Would keeping the reverb coming from the instrument muddy up the track?
Are u using 2 mono aux tracks for each mono verb plugins?
Can the same reverb buses be used for another channel, but with different pan direction?
Great!! Thanks man!!
This is very interesting, i will give it a shot :)
+Eric Kauffmann Baia, baia; Pero mira que sorpresa :U
Is this the hybrid version of protools nd logic 😀
Good trick, but why feed the dry signal in to aux that much? It makes the vocal too loud can't you hear this?
hi, why don't you use the reverbs 100% wet if they are being used as AUX Effx and nos as inserts? thanks!
Cool and thanks for this but wouldn’t u actually dip the reverb with the EQ at peak freqs on vocals to have them cut through more?
create 2 (reverb) sends, pan one left and pan one right. so the reverbs will be in stereo and sound different. So, is the original main vocal totally dry? I means before it goes to sends.
Is there a full course on reverb on ADSR, please?
also, we had a problem with logic where a few weeks ago they made a major update to the DAW and space desighner 's over all look. I found that not only the skin of it looked different, we lost our specific sound templates. Now were looking for a new reverb....when I find one can I NOT update it. Once I get familiar with a reverb platform, are updates necessary if I'm happy with what I have?
off topic here but keen on this pro tools theme lol.. if i buy logic X and upgrade my Os to work with it since mine is 10.6.8 would my old plugins work ? hopefully i dont have to reinstall them all?
FourOneBeats Hey, some would and some probably would need to be updated to a 64 bit environment.
Nice vid.
Is there a link to the full song as well?
the song is a direct rip-off of rihanna - diamonds
Hi Thanks For Sharing such a unique concept..... I really THANK YOU and Appreciate ... But Please also tell me that by saying "Creating Aux Sends" you mean to say creating Fx Channel ...Since i am a STUDIO ONE user and i dont get this .. In Studio One you can Create VAC, BUS and Fx only ...
Please Help
Md Ahmad on each studio one channel, they're split into insert and send when you press the arrow and open the channel.
Oh my god. That track (for a demo) sounds beautiful. Where can i find this???
I want so eagerly to learn this mixing edit music work.. Can u tell me which software is this... Is is Pro Tools or other software.. Is it work on Windows laptop? Pls reply
The reasons for putting your reverb at 100% wet are simple: maximum control over every other channel that shares the same reverb - applies in this context as well because you're talking about not over saturating your mix with reverb. Setting your reverb less than 100% doesn't seem to have a mixing disadvantage but it definitely has a workflow disadvantage which is why it looks weird when you do it. What do you do when you want more out of that same reverb space on another sound? Why do you want dry signal back from an aux send?
**Misinformation Alert**
So would you have different reverb spaces for different instruments?
Or would you put all the big sounds that you want reverb on to have same or the similar effects chain?
Great.
GREAT! thankyou!
+RossHildick3D Glad you liked!
Why is that Lead Voice track on stereo? Did u already had some processing on it and then bounced it out of logic and then imported into this session again? If so, do u have any idea of how to bounce a mono audio track as just mono when you bouncing that track, on Logic?
This is a cool trick by the way.. Thank you so much!!
What produser program this in? #ADSRMusicProductionTutorials
what are the vocals?
Dont u have to put the aux's reverb at 100% wet???
not neccesarily sometimes it helps to turn it down. it makes it sound less stronger and sometimes that helps it blend into the mix. sometimes it doesn't.
That doesnt make any sense. The aux gain is for that purpose.
it doesn't have to be. There are no rules when it comes to mixing. That's how people come up with new sounds. If everyone mixed the same, all mixes would sound exactly alike. You can use an aux gain to turn a reverb up and down, but you can also use your wet/dry knob to change how the reverb is affecting the mix. Try it for yourself and see the difference in how it affects the mix.
Rules are meant to be broken in audio
Agreed. 100 wet in Aux and dial in sounds worse than a lesser percentage.
Just watching this for the first time. But surely send fx should be at 100% wet?!
how do you do that in ableton?
***** oh man... how do u learn all of this??? lol i am currently in grad school and i wanna learn but i just feel lost.
nice man!
What I have Understood from this is That i can Create 2 Sends Channel of reverb each having a differnt type of Reverbs Panned Righ and Left respectively. M i Right?
Yes!!!
Amazing vocals, can you link it ?
Jordan Jost Hey Jordan, I cannot, it's from an original song by Meron Ryan. Thanks for watching!
How can I get this pro tools theme on logic, I love it!
Great information thank you! A question for you...I'm pretty new to all of this. My recordings are pretty simple, one and two guitars, ambient spaces and playing. Each guitar has three mics and a DI, is there anything wrong with using reverbs on the left and right mics (track 1 and 4 then bouncing down into my tracks? I pan each track left and right and apply the effects to those tracks for the spcious sound will that get me the same effect of 3d as your outlineing here? Thanks for your time~
can i have the acapella ? please
no
What kind of daw is that? It looks like a Pro Tools/Logic hybrid.
logic 10.3 new update
Thx dear vor this video, one question, what reverb are using on the first track (synth piano) ? Thank you
I really wouldn't classify this as a "trick". Tony Visconti's reverb is a "trick", Hass Effect can be considered a "trick". Here you just split the reverb and put two diff reverbs on either channel. Im sure the reason why you probably don't see this "trick" is cause its not revolutionary, it would be used in rare instance and could really bog down ones workflow when dialing in specific, highly detailed reverb parameters. That and there are several single plugins you could use to get this same effect in a much simpler fashion... Great video quality tho and you gained a subscriber cheers :)
This is exact what you should not do to setup a reverb , if you listen good , the vocal has now a blindspot on the right channel side , its important to keep every sound you edit stable in left en right percent...better turn up freqs on a subtile way in opposite direction ...by exmple left 2db of 1500hz.... right 1530hz on. and by the way if you pan something....doesnt mean that in that position the sound got the right curve for that position ...so adjusting eq is necessary, but tnx for efforts , good luck
Great Tip! One question...
When you added the Reverbs, neither were set at 100% Wet. Do you feel like the included Dry signal beefs up the sound a bit more? Are there any other reasons you do that? Awesome video man!
You've helped me a lot over the years. More than you know. So thanks again and again!!!
There is so much reverb on the piano, the vocal reverb gets lost in it ............... but thank you for the video and the tip !
Wish I knew the name of this song, it sounds cool =)
do you think that adjusting dry/wet mix knob to 100% on the reverb sends is unimportant?
***** what natural feel, man? ok i will explain. lets say you have 50/50 on the wet knob on reverb which is on aux channel. it means that 50% of mure unprocessed signal goes back to your original track and adds to it, altering your gain structure. and now imagine that you want yo put a compressor and/or saturator that can cause latency (and as a result , a phase shift) - it means that some of the signal with altered phase will come back to ur original signal and mess up the phase. and you will get all crazy trying to figure out why this or that doesnt sound right.
***** you can achieve the same feel without sideffects, all im saying. make it 100% wet and dont touch it. now add the send level to the channel to the taste and bam, phase and all that shit is not a headache, move on .
ArmorKingEmir Was just about to say the exact same thing. This may cause a major shitload of phase issues and it's a completely retarded way of doing something really simple...
Anoesj Sadraee
yes its retarded but if you tell them that they are retarded they will not understand your intentions to help.
ArmorKingEmir It's not a question of unimportant, but how does it sounds. I personally don't like that sound on vocals. The reason for that is it's unnatural to my ears. In the real world of psychoacoustics, our hears will never hear in isolation a 100% wet reverb signal (in a normal listening environment.) If a singer is performing in a room like a bathroom, we hear the dry and reverb signals. Regarding the phase issues that you mention below, please see the attached picture links. The phase shift is almost nominal.
SENDS ACTIVE i.imgur.com/AJzSRBH.png?1
NO SEND i.imgur.com/qGwav81.png?1
You can add delay to the left and right sends, just to convert them as early relections. Good try though. Thanks.
Yeah sorry to burst your bubble but that’s not vintage Valhalla room... the one your using is ValhallaroomDsp
Nice x
the vocals are not dry. i can hear the reverb
Jimmy Page of Led Zeppelin was hard-panning reverb back in the late 60s.
Sounds like Rihanna
But doesn't this whole principle/method fall apart as soon as you play the song in mono?
I mean let's say I make this sweet Tropical House song with panned reverb sends so everything is nice and clean, but then I go to the beach and hit play on my mono beach speaker while chilling - then it sounds muddier as everything has been summed to mono and my reverbs suddenly collide.
Sure this method improves the reverb sound, but I wouldn't completely rely on it, I'd rather EQ the reverbs for plain mixing separation purposes and use this method to sweeten the mix for stereo playback.
View this method as panning sustained instruments - it's cool but it doesn't help a thing on some systems, and you're better off by improving your skills with the EQ and sound selection.
+steffeeH I believe that's true only if you pan left and right to 100%.
With this method to 35% you still can hear the mono and stereo reverb.
This is a method that you can use in mixing. but as usually you have to mix in mono too to see how all translates too. so yeah it might not work in mono much, but with extra editing you can get it there without any problem with the method itself !
is this some 3rd party skin?? It looks like PT! I need it!!