Queen Mary Wreck Explored - Shipwreck Secrets - Documentary

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 พ.ย. 2024
  • Take a deep dive into the heart of the Battle of Jutland, where the HMS Queen Mary met her tragic end. Explore the mysteries lying beneath the waves through cutting-edge footage and expert analysis. Join us as we unravel the secrets of this monumental naval clash and the wrecks it left behind.
    -------
    Dive into the depths with Shipwreck Secrets as teams of explorers and maritime experts unearth the mysteries of sunken vessels worldwide. From the Bermuda Triangle's enigmatic wrecks to relics of the largest naval battles, witness cutting-edge underwater technology unveil long-lost stories and secrets from the ocean floor.
    -------
    Welcome to Banijay Adventure, your ultimate destination for thrilling exploration and discovery! 🌍⛵
    Explore the wild with Fishing The Wild, dive into maritime mysteries in Shipwreck Secrets, and join Anthony Bourdain: Parts Unknown for thrilling global adventures.
    Subscribe to Banijay Adventure for epic journeys: www.youtube.co...
    #adventureshows #traveldocumentaries #explorationseries

ความคิดเห็น • 45

  • @NormanBraslow-nh2tz
    @NormanBraslow-nh2tz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This is the HMS (His Majesty's Ship) Queen Mary. A battle cruiser. The Queen Mary in Long Beach is the RMS (Royal Mail Asia) Queen Mary. A commercial liner.

    • @bobwilson758
      @bobwilson758 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you - good info .

    • @Brock_Landers
      @Brock_Landers 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bubba, RMS stands for Royal Mail Ship...although to some it stands for Royal Mail Steamer, but I prefer the first version. Steamers don't really exist anymore.

  • @jamesmarchant9665
    @jamesmarchant9665 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    One is a british WW1 british battlecruiser sunk during the battle of Jutland, and the other is a british ocean liner.

  • @sreed8570
    @sreed8570 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Having cracked the German naval codes was a double edged sword, as soon as the Admiralty started disseminating that information to its commanders in any appreciable way the Germens been pretty quick to catch on. The trick was to use the information so sparingly as to almost negate having it.

  • @AlanFenick
    @AlanFenick 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Remember one of the residents of Jutland stated “after the Battle of Jutland the eels ran well” (for two years). The number men lost was about 8,600+ for both sides with the English suffering over 6,500+ more than half the deaths came from the three sunk English battle cruisers. I wondered what happened in 1945 with the German evacuation of the Baltic States and the sinking of many of German ships carrying tens of thousands of civilian refugees and combatants sunk by Soviet submarines.

  • @longhunter1951
    @longhunter1951 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    How much of the destruction on the wrecks was caused by post war salvagers?

    • @AndreasKonig-qq7yk
      @AndreasKonig-qq7yk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      missing propellers are usually the doings of salvagers.

  • @GeoffInfield
    @GeoffInfield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for sharing this, kind of annoying that it keeps clumsily trying to make the reason for splitting a bit mystery when I'm pretty sure all of us figured it out the second they saw a cross-section of the midships gun turret after saying it blew up midships and split. There's literally no other explanation but there was some fascinating detail around it. I'm surprised it's only 60m out there, when I saw rebreathers I was thinking 100m plus. Cool.

  • @tj9577
    @tj9577 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I visited the Queen Mary ocean liner docked in Longbeach California.., and listening to this chopped up line of documentation ,and saying to myself ,this makes absolutely no sense at all ..???????

    • @codyking4848
      @codyking4848 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This is about HMS Queen Mary. The ship you visited is the RMS Queen Mary.

    • @harrylor66
      @harrylor66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're not serious, are you...?🥸
      Remember: Google is your friend!🤠😁
      Admiral Sir David Beatty would have let you clean the deck of the "H.M.S. Queen Elizabeth",
      and this deck is large!😁😉

  • @181stTIE
    @181stTIE 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Such a bloody shame. Limited images of QM, and well established facts rehashed as new and revealing information, topped off by an actor playing Jellicoe wearing a captains uniform with four single stripes. BTW for the producers... when you are referring to a ship that has been lost in the past tense, it is 'sank' and not 'sunk'. The ship is sinking, the ship has sunk and the ship sank at X time or at Y coordinates.

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I think it's such a shame that these ships were sinked.... Nobody wants to be aboard a ship while it's sanking. 😉
      I liked how they talked about specific ships while airing stock footage of ships that had absolutely nothing to do with this battle. Like when they showed footage of the Austro-Hungarian battleship Svent Istvan sinking, after being torpedoed by a tiny Italian torpedo boat.

    • @bobwilson758
      @bobwilson758 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Right fellas - unfortunately , not very well produced video . A shame actually .

    • @NashmanNash
      @NashmanNash 16 วันที่ผ่านมา

      What do you expect from "modern day" documentaries....We can be happy they still follow the attention span of people who need an advertisement every 15 minutes instead of those of generation TikTok

  • @gvbrandolini
    @gvbrandolini 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Interessante

  • @geofflewis8599
    @geofflewis8599 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    ..same reason the Bismarck sank the Hood..

  • @stevewheatley243
    @stevewheatley243 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The British won at Jutland and maintained control of the seas.

  • @NormanBraslow-nh2tz
    @NormanBraslow-nh2tz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sir John Fischer did not design the battle cruisers to fight as they were here.

  • @bobkohl6779
    @bobkohl6779 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Nothing new old history. They knew a lot of years ago

  • @surferdude4487
    @surferdude4487 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I've watched a few documentaries about the battle of Jutland. I do not recall the HMS Queen Mary as being one of the vessels lost in that battle.

    • @harrylor66
      @harrylor66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, perhaps you should have
      read a good book about the "Battle of Jutland" instead of watching bad and cheap documentaries?🤔🤣

    • @surferdude4487
      @surferdude4487 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harrylor66 Or stop putting documentaries on to help me get to sleep.

  • @RobertSchindler-iu1lk
    @RobertSchindler-iu1lk หลายเดือนก่อน

    I like the historical information. But so many of these podcasts just repeat the same information too much. It could be 2/3 as long. Just a thought.

  • @samstewart4807
    @samstewart4807 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    hmm you are going to take 41 minutes to tell me the british ships were junk? It took me 27 seconds to write this comment.

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🚫 No, that's not what they said. They took 41 mins to tell you that the ships catastrophically exploded because Beatty ordered basic shell handling safety protocols to be ignored, leaving blast doors wide open, in order to speed up the gun loading process. That led to the ships being sunk when German shells exploded and blast waves were easily able to travel through the open blast doors and into the ammunition magazines, causing catastrophic explosions that blasted the ships in half.

  • @mikemc7704
    @mikemc7704 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Accutually, mental scrap pirots from that area have been stealing the metal from all the ships for years. I saw a timeline special on it. some of our greatest ships have disappeared .

  • @Burninhellscrootoob
    @Burninhellscrootoob 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We know why,and how the battlecruisers exploded in two, central hits on Q turrets resulting in flash fires going through open hatches to powder magazines....
    The forensic cause for this show is just an excuse to get permission to dive on the wrecks. Theres simply no other reason....personally, id have rather seen a report on condition due to corrosion after all this time, deterioration, and identifyable parts, or documentation on the damage visible today. We know what happened already. We dont need history made cheesy....

  • @stevewheatley243
    @stevewheatley243 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I've always heard the battle of Jutland was a draw. Not a British defeat.

    • @08jag81
      @08jag81 หลายเดือนก่อน

      British victory really

  • @darrenfreese5328
    @darrenfreese5328 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So there is a queen mary sunk in the ocean, but there is a haunted queen Mary floating at a dock that you can visit? What am I missing

    • @NormanBraslow-nh2tz
      @NormanBraslow-nh2tz 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      This is the HMS Queen Mary. The one in Long Bechbis the RMS Queen Mary. Big difference.

  • @scottbruner9266
    @scottbruner9266 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    There’s a film I found that shows what MIGHT have happened to the Queen Mary. I KNOW it’s from the next war, but it’s representative of one possible scenario….
    th-cam.com/video/PmTZ-R4QM1E/w-d-xo.htmlsi=0lGpPBbB7XVRTt1m

  • @chrisstecker7323
    @chrisstecker7323 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Umm the queen Mary has not sunk get your facts straight

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Do a Google search before you post that stuff, because _yes, the BATTLECRUISER_ HMS Queen Mary was sunk during the battle of Jutland. It's common for navies to name new ships after old ones that are out of service.

    • @DaiElsan
      @DaiElsan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Battlecruiser HMS QUEEN MARY. Check your history.

    • @codyking4848
      @codyking4848 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lol - HMS Queen Mary is most definitely at the bottom of the sea. RMS Queen Mary is safely docked as a museum ship. Get YOUR facts straight.

    • @harrylor66
      @harrylor66 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Well, in principle your statement is correct.🤣😂😅
      The "H.M.S. Queen Mary" (Lion class
      battlecruiser, 1913) did not simply "sink". She first "EXPLODED" and then sank...!🤔🧐

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@harrylor66
      ⚓Yes, but it's time that the public were finally told the truth about _HOW_ they exploded. It was the early 40's, and I'd been tapped to become the first navy seal. After a few hours of intense training, I swam to Jutland.
      Once there, I covertly boarded each of the 3 British battle cruisers and tossed a satchel charge with a 45sec timer into each ship's powder and shell magazine, and then I got the hell outta Dodge!
      As each ship was catastrophically exploding, I was busy swimming to the next ship to blow it up! I got 3 of them that day, but I insisted that they not give me credit for it. My extreme humbleness precludes me from taking credit for my bada$$ exploits & being showered with the praise and adoration I deserve...... 🙃

  • @MarkMeader-e4r
    @MarkMeader-e4r 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sooo Looking Forward To Seeing Beautiful Talented Oompa-Riki On Stage Perform This In Edinburgh and Broadway!!!!!!!🩷🩷🩷👩‍🦳👩‍🦳👩‍🦳✍️✍️🎼🎼🎤🎤🎸🎸👩‍🦳👩‍🦳👩‍🦳🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷