@@Vegitanimator eeeh no Dracorex and stigymoloch were young pachycephalosaurus and it doesn’t have anything to do with what you said. Don’t worry I’ll explain you. Saurophaganax is it’s own gender since one of the vertebrae found of it is sufficiently different from that of the allosaurus. Torosaurus is an especial case, currently, many paleontologists consider it a Triceratops, however, the ruff of Torosaurus is too different from that of Triceratops, so much so that it is difficult to think that a Triceratops would have such a drastic change as it grew. Now, why are stigymoloch and dracorex considered invalid genders? easy, both were found in the same formation as pachycephalosaurus, which indicates that they shared the same niche. The problem is that their role in this niche would not make much sense, besides by chance, both cover each stage of development of pachycephalosaurus (stigymoloch = subadult; dracorex = juvenile).
@@Vegitanimator You don't need to be so aggressive! Yes the skull is different, but all dinosaurs are different in their different stages. Look at a baby triceratops and you'll see how ugly and adorable it is at the same time hahahahaha. It does not look at all like an adult triceratops, the same goes for the juvenile tyrannosaurus which was very different from its adult stage. It's a matter of not being stubborn and wanting to learn, mate!
This guy s amazing!
Im a girl but thnx!! :D
Im so sorry
:(
@@Saurus619 it's ok it's not a big deal at all!!
Ofc the hand gets ripped off!
Spino wins mid-high diff
@@karmakumchok3122 actually nope, please research it charchar is stronger than you think
can you make carcharodontosaurus vs acrocanthosaurus
Stigyimoloch vs dracorex
That doesn’t make sense XD
Stigymoloch and dracorex were in fact young pachycephalosaurus
@@juanignaciocastillo6284 that's like saying torosaurus was a fully grown triceratops, or Saurophaganax wasn't an allosaurus.
@@Vegitanimator eeeh no
Dracorex and stigymoloch were young pachycephalosaurus and it doesn’t have anything to do with what you said. Don’t worry I’ll explain you.
Saurophaganax is it’s own gender since one of the vertebrae found of it is sufficiently different from that of the allosaurus.
Torosaurus is an especial case, currently, many paleontologists consider it a Triceratops, however, the ruff of Torosaurus is too different from that of Triceratops, so much so that it is difficult to think that a Triceratops would have such a drastic change as it grew.
Now, why are stigymoloch and dracorex considered invalid genders? easy, both were found in the same formation as pachycephalosaurus, which indicates that they shared the same niche. The problem is that their role in this niche would not make much sense, besides by chance, both cover each stage of development of pachycephalosaurus (stigymoloch = subadult; dracorex = juvenile).
@@juanignaciocastillo6284 not very good explenation. Your case is quite hypocritical of this matter. The head was too different to be a pachy.
@@Vegitanimator You don't need to be so aggressive! Yes the skull is different, but all dinosaurs are different in their different stages. Look at a baby triceratops and you'll see how ugly and adorable it is at the same time hahahahaha. It does not look at all like an adult triceratops, the same goes for the juvenile tyrannosaurus which was very different from its adult stage. It's a matter of not being stubborn and wanting to learn, mate!