ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
Who Buried Paul? 1999 Who Killed Paul McCarthy? Brian Moriarty
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2013
- Who Buried Paul? 1999 Who Killed Paul McCarthy?
ludix.com/moriarty/paul.html
The opinions expressed in the interviews included in Who Buried Paul? are those of the participants.
The images and sounds on this web resource are the property of their respective copyright holders, and are included here for educational purposes.
He's talking about Paul is not dead. Well for all we know he may be alive and on an island somewhere. We don't have proof one way or the other. If he's dead RIP ..Paul WE LOVE AND MISS YOU. However the issue here is that we know that Paul McCartney Was replaced with Billie Shears- Campbell Shepherd whatever name he goes by..and that is a fact. Its in plain sight for everyone to see. And if you cant see it take those blinders off. And you too Mr Brian Moran
Another Great Documentary is Called “The Winged Beatle” it’s one of the best films about The Beatles to date and a must see for everyone that is a true fan of The Beatles. . . If you still have any doubts after watching that all you need to do is have another look at the colour film footage in the movie called “HELP” and compare it to the magical mystery tour colour film footage. . . However, it’s much easier to have a look at a video Called “Paul is Dead/ Faul McCartney/ Plastic Macca On Waxe Radio w/Tina Foster. . The side by side photographic evidence is some of the best. . Only the smart ones know that James Paul McCartney was replaced with Billy Shears. .
Yes, "only the smart ones", like the geniuses who believe Paul McCartney died, but his bandmates were so desperate to hide the truth that they continuously left clues for everyone. Yes, and the moon landing was faked.
This guy is a paid schill. One doesn't need clues hidden in album covers to know. Just study the Beatles live concerts from they began until the end of 1966 and take notice of Paul. He was a genius performer, he had an aura of likeability that just oozed out of him whether he was performing or in interviews. Then look at the concert they recorded on the roof and don't even try to tell me that that is the same Paul.
He forgot George Harrison's "He never wore his shoes, we all know he was dead."
You are limiting your explanations to clues which were on the four records. Well, let me this. I was 17 y.o. when Paul disappeared. I was in France, and there, the craze was not caused by the american rumours, or the clues on the records. We weren't aware of these. But, what we were aware of, is that when Paul 'returned', not from the dead, we started to question it his appearances. He was much taller, his head was longer and thinner, his eyes different, well in one word, Paul was 'different', and we all suspected that this was not Paul. But what is it. Too naive then in playing detectives, we left it to that.
It is recently, 50 years later, that I started to question in depth all the reasons and did I come across more mature explanations than silly jokes on records?
Being a doubting Thomas, I drew more attention on people who were specialised in forensics and came across interesting and convincing truthful statements supported by measurements, of Paul's head, his eyes, the various changes in his face, as one plastic surgery had not succeeded in changing him into a carbon copy of the real Paul.
I ignored the esoteric area of the story, although story it is not.
It is true that Paul's features are not those of the real Paul. Although I do not necessary support the car crash story, there may be another reason why Paul 'disappeared' and had to be replaced. Why not after all? The Beatles had everything at stake if Paul had left the band. They were a commodity to the UK, Paul their main asset. No Paul, no Beatles would guarantee sudden death or rather sudden bankruptcy.
This could not happen, and what about the fans? The mystery was created by the Beatles themselves, for hiding the truth from us, for replacing (yes I believe Paul was replaced) Paul with Faul. Which lead me to question why would Lennon call Paul Faul? John being eccentric and original to say the least, and also a bit of a rebel with a remarkable gift of saying what he thought without reservation, was suddenly restricted in talking about the truth, as otherwise his own life was endangered. Perhaps this is why John, who left too many clues, irritated 'somebody', whoever this 'somebody' is, in authority, freemasons, how do we know? His embarrassing comments definitely annoyed someone who silenced him for good, in case one day he would speak out the truth.
George Harrison was to be the next Beatle to speak out, but having not yet been in breach of contract, made the same 'somebody' nervous, and his house was broken in and we know the fear this caused George. A warning was given to him but he became ill some time after and took the truth with him.
Now for those of you who believe in the esoteric and the supernatural, could the voices on the 4 records be from the unknown? Many stories of this happening in other circumstances are reported by thousands of witnesses in all walks of life. Voices have been heard, people have been guided by the 'other world', but that subject I do not wish to go near, as it is better left alone. Judge for yourselves.
kinda makes you understand that deception is the biggest money maker and controller of all motivating forces, and its a sad realization. The Bible calls it the refuse of lies and to think that the information age has turned into the age of disinformation, lies that are upheld in high places...
Take any two pictures of Paul and Faul and measure the distance from eye pupil to pupil and then draw a perpendicular from that line between the eyes to the bottom of the top front teeth and you will get a ratio. Convert the ratio to a number where the eye to eye distance is always 1.0 relative to the line to the teeth and you will get a number such as 1.15 to 1.17 for Paul and a number like 1.015 to 1.045 for Faul. This is a ratio that does not change throughout life. Two different looking people may have the same ratio, but the odds are less that a double will have the same ratio. This is how they spotted the Hillary Clinton double Theresa Barnwell.
What about the fact Faul is at least 3 inches taller...he has Hazel eyes unlike Pauls brown eyes, his hair parts on the opposite side, his face is clearly longer in length, he has 6 toes etc...etc...
Three inches taller and the only ones that noticed are the PID. Go figure.
Yes, I'm sure he has 6 toes. That is without a doubt. Also, whispy fairies dance around your bed every night and mock you.
Are they webbed? 😅
@@curtandoscar There is a photo showing the 6 toes , you twit !
@@handle-schmandleWe are many
As a young adult a saw a short film been shown in the news in which
Mr. McCartney Sr. , was been pulled out of the building as he yelled out “That man on the stage is not my Son”, “that is not my Son”.
I never heard or saw Mr. McCartney Sr. Again....for sure he would be the only real person to know if in reality that was his son or not.... so terribly sad.😪
Rosie 1925, is that true? any way to get a link to that? I believe it...Did you know Faul never even went to his own fathers funeral...they where suppose to be so close also? when McCartney was asked why he didn't attend his response was ...he didn't want a media circus...that's a load of crap ! celebrities go to pay there respects all the time they just hire security...He didn't go because relatives would have noticed things where different about him and blown his cover that's why!
Now don't be silly, you're making that up, aren't you?
Ya, terribly sad that Paul's dad must have been murdered "because he knew too much". Also, the earth if flat, and immigrants are poisoning the blood of the U.S. It must be true, since both Hitler AND Donald Trump both said it!!!
@@fanorydberg2424Why would he do that? 😕
@@rcobbet I'm late to the party here. But Faul didn't go to his father's funeral and was seen laughing and clowning three days after his "father" died. Also, at one point, his father was interviewed, and said that Faul didn't invite the family to Faul's wedding with Linda, and Faul didn't even inform them of it. Faul pretty much cut off family. Why wouldn't he? They weren't his family.
I'm an artist and make a living doing portraits. I guarantee you, these two faces are not...NOT. ..the same, pre and post 1966. The new guy is NOT the same guy from pre 66. I believe my own eyes before anything else, and the post 66 guy is NOT the original Paul. Screw the clues, he's not the same guy, absolutely, period! Bet my life on it.
Exactly !
This is all bullshit and you are an actual moron.
Eye color is the biggest giveaway for me. But then there is body language on stage which is totally different as well. People are so easily fooled. Partly, I believe, because they want to be.
I have the exact same experience attempting to sculpt his face from photos pre and post ‘66, they do not sync up !
GH IN AN INTERVIEW SAID A STRANGE THING HAPPENED IN 1966 AND OPENED HIS MIND TO THE TRUTH and he can to talk about the events. SECOND WIFE, I THINK HAD A MISSING LEG, SHE SAID that SHE DIVORCED Paul because she found out a huge secret that she cannot divulge to world
because the world could not handle it, and she had to sign a document to keep it secret
Or some sort of response from the McCartney group. The album is a fumbling stupid conspiracy. So many people fall for it. Read interviews, not the album. Then give another talk,and see what people think. oh, RS STATED IN AN INTERVIEW. 2 Beatles were left him and William.
In 2015 Ringo Starr confirmed that Paul is really dead.
Link, please? Funny how that keeps being repeated, but no one ever provides a link. I can't find any. The "Hollywood Inquirer", which supposedly did that interview with Ringo, doesn't exist. It was fake. If people have to lie and invent a fake "confession" to prove their case, the case isn't valid.
LINK TO THE EVIDENCE OR ITS LIES.
During the Decmeber 9th 2017 concert at Brisbane, Australia; Paul reads a sign in the audience which read: I was at Shae 1965. His immediate comment to this was; "hmmm, before my time." Why would he say this?
A joke, obviously, making out he's a lot younger than he is.
@@fanorydberg2424 fanobot
Do you have video of this event?
Clearly a joke wtf are you actually this dense? Omfg
There's sn interview with Faul in a car, and he says something like "When I joined the Beatles it was already a set up affair" ... not! He and John started it! How obvious is that!!?
In an exclusive interview with the Hollywood Inquirer, Mr. Starr explained that the “real” Paul McCartney had died in a car crash on November 9 1966, after an argument during a Beatles’ recording session. To spare the public from grief, the Beatles replaced him with a man named William Shears Campbell, who was the winner of a McCartney look-alike contest and who happened to have the same kind of jovial personality as Paul.
“When Paul died, we all panicked!” claims Ringo, obviously very emotional. “We didn’t know what to do, and Brian Epstein, our manager, suggested that we hire Billy Shears as a temporary solution. It was supposed to last only a week or two, but time went by and nobody seemed to notice, so we kept playing along. Billy turned out to be a pretty good musician and he was able to perform almost better than Paul. The only problem was that he couldn’t get along with John, at all.”
I suggested do your homework sir
Paul no murió el 9 de noviembre como lo dice la teoria oficial , Paul murió el 11 de Septiembre.
Beatle Bill stepped in when Paul was “taken out”.
Sept 11 1966 not accident
I suggest that you stay off drugs.Do you realize that Paul and John were the only two Beatles that performed the song the ballad of John and yoko.Do you not understand that in no way form or fashion that they could find a Paul look alike and who was left handed and sounded exactly like Paul that quickly if it were even possible?Watch videos that aren’t doctored and audios that aren’t doctored from 1967-on and see for yourself that it’s the same Paul that started his singing career as a Beatle
@@billybuttram2458 I suggest you, on the contrary, should take drugs for a while, dare to do some research. Ringo himself admitted it.They had chosen a lookalike for just a few days but as no one noticed they went ahead with it.The real Paul could only do a few chords unlike his replacement.It can all be found but you have to dare.
Take the trouble to look at pictures and just look at the difference in height compared to Paul and Linda.
Who is Paul McCARTHY!! when you are doing a biographical account start with getting the name right.
James Vozar Yeah,the guys an idiot.
Cruz Morales "an" idiot
Rupert Quaintance .......
James Vozar lol yah..i will turn it off ..i dont care about paul mccarthy
ahahahaha ;)
I think what is interesting is Wired Magazine hired a forensic firm to put this matter to rest once and for all as the magazine believed this was in fact all nonsense. They did all the typical tests like voice, face, (bone structure), ears and teeth analysis. The forensic team and the people at Wired were all shocked by the results. On the voice analysis
alone there were three distinct individuals, one up to 1966, another one in 1966 and a completely different one after 1966. Also there facial forms did not match from pre-1966 to after 1966 and so did their teeth didn't match either. The ears were not the same nor was the distance between the pupils. Another thing they discovered that most of the imagines released by their record label had been doctored pre 66 Paul to look more like after 66 Paul. No imagines were altered after 66 Paul. There forensic conclusion was that there was one guy that was Paul up to 1966, another one that was playing Paul just in 1966 on their albums and then a completely different Paul from after 1966 to the present. They also said there forensic analysis would hold up in any court of law as the firm and its' analysis is consistently being used in the courts. That would mean the real Paul may have died in 1965 or early 1966 and not late 1966. It appears someone else played Paul during the recording sessions in 1966 and then he was replaced by yet another Paul after 1966 to the present. I think what is also interesting is that a guy has claimed that in 1966 he was invited to a private party by a friend at Parlophone who released the Beatles albums in the UK until 1968 when it was Apple and he swears at this party he saw two Pauls, one that was with Jane Asher and the other one with Linda Eastman. Maybe just maybe as the Beatles were known to use doubles to redirect the press and fans that he actually saw the real Paul and his double and something happened to the real Paul and this guy just took his place as the public were already used to believing that he was the real Paul. Hard science facts do confirm that there were in fact three Pauls but as to why it would be is any ones guess. For all we know all three could be still alive but were replaced due to illness but not death, drug addiction where they just couldn't function or maybe the first two just had had enough and were burned out. As they were and still are a huge financial machine, just maybe the other members and the machine behind them wanted to keep it all going as it still continues to this very day! Almost forgot as it common knowledge that Paul fathered two children in early 63 and in 64, a son and a daughter. The son's mother settle privately with Paul and the girls mother settled in court which is part of the public record in England. Both received huge settlements. The son has an interview on you tube by a private investigative reporter and he claims that when he turned 7 his mother told him that the father he thinks is his father is really his step father and that his real father was Paul McCartney and he was told of the financial settlement. She went on to say that Paul was no longer alive and that there was someone else that is playing the part of his father. Why would a mother make up a story like this and tell it to a 7 year old if it was not actually true! There is another women in Germany that claims she is also the daughter of Paul but she received no financial settlement. They claim when he was ordered by the court for a DNA test that Paul switched the tests. Could it be that the test did not match because the Paul pre 66 is not the Paul after 66? The more you dig the muddier it's gets!
Just to comment on the 3 Paul's...I believe sorta the real Paul was beating to death by Illuminati handlers ...both John n Paul were feared by these elite people for having dirt on the royal family....they feared they would spit actual truth like "all you need is love"...maybe they were using two fake Fauls at that party to see if anyone would notice and be able to tell difference between plus maybe which one looked more "real"!!
forensics cant be done with pictures alone. Pictures are only as good as the camera for starters. they can be altered and often were to fit in a magazine's spaces. they can crop out people next to you as an example. You would need pauls actual skull and skeleton to begin forensic evidence and a dead body from the sixties to compare it to. (there isn't one) The Paul that is still alive might not want to volunteer his body to prove he is alive any more than you would. And those italians said as much about it not being proof if you read it fully.
It is so oblivious that Paul is dead and other "Fauls" have played the role. The thing is; the music has always been good. So the Paul that I know and love and learned how to play bass by copying was Billy Shears, or other...a great player. It is sad that the Beatles have never come clean.
Just look at the difference from Rubber Soul:
Michelle, ma belle
These are words that go together well
My Michelle
I love you, I love you, I love you
That's all I want to say
Until I find a way
I will say the only words I know that
You'll understand
From Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band:
Woke up, fell out of bed,
Dragged a comb across my head
Found my way downstairs and drank a cup,
And looking up I noticed I was late.
Found my coat and grabbed my hat
Made the bus in seconds flat
Found my way upstairs and had a smoke,
Somebody spoke and I went into a dream.
or:
When I get older losing my hair
Many years from now
Will you still be sending me a valentine
Birthday greetings, bottle of wine?
If I'd been out till quarter to three
Would you lock the door?
Will you still need me
Will you still feed me
When I'm sixty-four?
This is not the same artist. Anyway you look at it, still all great songs.
Do you do any research Ted? You could say Lennons songs are written by others with a similar comparison. Both were self taught musicians who absorbed all they heard musically and artistically. When I'm sixty-four was written before the beatles hit it big, the music was written in tha late fifties! They played the song in the cavern club! Michelle won a grammy award for best song, "Woke up, fell out of bed..." was a song fragment that fit into lennons song when he could not come up with the middle section. Paul also added in the orchestra and piano sounds that connect the pieces and end the song, as well as "I'd love to turn you on" People as creative as the beatles grow as they mature, and sometimes settle on something different than their early works. Famous artists paint different as they age and mature and so do musicians. Others know what works for them and stick to that.
Interesting, however, I stand behind what I said. In any case, it is still obvious that Paul is dead. The evidence is clear.
By making fun of something serious, you create doubt. This is a common technique used and thought by physiologists. Great technique to deceive a person or a mass of people.
Wouldn't this be world shocking if this truth really did come out..... why do you think Heather Mills was in fear of her life when she found out....?? Remember what she said on a TV interview about certain insurances she has in case she is taken out....
Oh yeah, that was a very telling talk that Heather made for sure !
No one would be able to handle the truth
I still remember that haunting bit of footage, and recall speculating wildly on what this secret might be. That was before many of us had internet in our homes. Must re-watch that gobbet.
McCartney of course... but it's always interesting when the Tavistock and other institutes get desperate to suppress something they get out a tool like this to talk about it.
The problem is that the current generations have no conception of how absolutely insanely popular The Beatles were. Too much money was involved. Wake up, Lennon was warned to quit leaving clues then he was shot. George opened his mouth and his mansion was broken into. Ringo needs to speak up.
Yes. I'm sure John Lennon was shot because he kept "leaving clues." Also, the earth is flat, and Donald Trump was a great president who never cheated on any of his 3 wives.
What did George Harrison say that implied Paul was dead?
@@AdamCoate he didn’t say anything that suggests that, but the conspiracy theories point to the most random things. In one interview he says about how “the dream of the Beatles was over in 1966” and the nut heads think this is a sworn testimony stating Paul died.
It’s lame and horrifically disrespectful to Paul and his family, really.
@@AdamCoate There are a bunch of YT video interviews where George clearly calls him "Faul" repeatedly.
PETE BEST is the last surviving original BEATLE.
If the internet were around in 1966 the news of Paul's death would have spread like wildfire instead Billy, Paul's obnoxious replacement has taken Paul's name and has run with it deceiving millions of fans for 58 years.
Paul was not the "only left handed Beatle", Ringo is also left handed. It is a contributing factor regarding his drumming style. Although Ringo plays on a right handed drum set, he is left handed.
the walrus WAS paul. past tense.
Because they were reffering to a song they previously wrote
Actually it has been proven not once but twice using forensics that there were at least two of them and this can be used in any court of law. Not only is the audio different but so is facial bone structure, ears, distance between the eyes, distance from the top of the forehead to bottom of chin, cranial size, height, weight, shoe size, and the list goes on. Wired magazine hired a forensic firm that does a lot of work for law enforcement and prosecutors to debunk the whole thing and boy were they surprised. They even said that pictures of early Paul until the band broke up were actually doctored to morph the two. They said it was to make people forget what Paul actually looked like. Also a photographer from Italy up to late 66 was the bands choice and after 66 his apartment was broken into and by the way it was done it appeared to him someone was looking for all the originals and negatives of the band. A few days later he gets a call and reps for the new guy wanted to buy these and he refused. They never did get the pics or negatives.
Crazy! Early 70s rumor: they broke up because both the fake Paul was tired of it and also the notes Paul had left behind of new song material was running out. That's why he changed; looking different, doing Wings, writing songs that were nothing like Beatle songs. Also, the relationship with longtime girl friend Jayne ended or rather faded as the second Paul took over, and he ended up with Linda.
+Don Diego Vega They broke up because they GREW up and Paul "Changed" because that's what happens as we get older.
And in an interview once, Linda played down Paul's fame and said "he is just a man." While that comment seems down to earth, one wonders in THIS case if she was also alluding to something more. Hmm.
The changes in 'Paul's' music should be obvious to anyone with any musical sense.
Alan Thomas ~ Only the smart ones know that James Paul McCartney was replaced with Billy Shears. .
Have you ever heard the change in twenty one pilots music?
MAH TASTE IN MUSIC UR FACE! ~ Yeah,
Have you seen the change in faces in a short documentary film called =
“Paul to Faul - 1966/1967 interviews more differences”
By Sandpit123.
Even Stevie Wonder could see the difference between these two completely different individuals.
No body can change that much in 5 months after smoking a few spliffs & taking a little bit of LSD. .
The Truth is stranger than Fiction. .
Bill is quite different from Paul. Yeah that's true.
@@foyasoul2 But he was actually replaced, that's the difference here.
you can hear plain as day , i buried Paul , Not Cranberry Sauce ....
Kurt Snyder it's definitely cranberry sauce. Sounds like cranberry sauce on my studio speakers and it sounded cranberry sauce on my crappy old record player when I was a kid. What are you listening on?
I listened closely...its 'My hairy balls"
They re-recorded ' l buried Paul' to read 'Cranberry Sauce'.
I heard ''Monberry Hall''. Must be losing my hearing :(
That's right, Bill also goes up into Paul's tree in Strawberry Fields to 'Tune in' to Paul's spirit. John even says in the song that he doesn't he can tune up, but it's alright. It doesn't matter much to him.
This guy gives me the creeps.........whether or not Paul was killed in 1966!
That kid in ohio looks like Jim Morrison
Mary Uhlik I thought that too!
Mary Uhlik
Is there a clue in that name
This indicates the diabolical nature of the game industry.
I've never bought into these theories, I still find it all far fetched.
Do any of you know what The Tavistock Institute is and what they do?
Who cares?
Yes, and they manufactured what we know as the Beatles
you do. Thats why you posted you sop
a secret organization does not use the most publicized band in history for anything. they would risk exposure far too much. John could simply call a news conference and expose them all. this new theory is just someone's 'clue for you all.'
Curt B
But John called no one and allowed Tavistock complete control, do some research!
Paul was really replaced with the help of MI6 and Lennon put in the clues. Don't think it's strange that Lennon releases an album called Double Fantasy (like the double is a fake) and then is killed by a fan hearing voices in his head.
+Billy Shepard
You can always tell when the "Faul" brigade are out and about. They get basic facts wrong. Why would MI6 - The Secret Intelligence Service, the UK's foreign intelligence gathering department, be involved in an internal British matter such replacing a pop star supposedly killed in a crash? Explain...And no, I don't think John Lennon had anything to do with the "clues"...
Billy Shepard op
@Jerry Rogers even worse, ritual.
@@lorddaver1935 The band and their families and friends have been saying indirectly he have been replaced for almost 60 years and you call it "clues". Yeah, how does 3 ultrabillionaires in the 60s get secret service and others to help them??? Try using your brain man.
@@lorddaver1935Because Beatles was the biggest Band at the time.
There are still unexplained features of this story, like Paul's father not being informed of his marriage to Linda, let alone being invited, and also Paul not going to his father's funeral... unless these bits of info are untrue.
He didn't go to his father's funeral because he was on tour in the US. He was prepared to go, but the family were OK with him not being there. It's one of those things where people read something into it that just isn't there.
@@fanorydberg2424 No it's because Paul's not Paul bro. It's Bill.
Paul was actually replaced by Bill, he even refers to himself as Billy in interviews.
@TechnodromeTV Others are too. There is lots of footage where he's greeted Hi Billy! - By George wife for example. The DNA/fingerprint discrepancies and the fact he's never taken a DNA together with his brother to shoot it down, is enough for me. Then there's Heather Mills and the italien forensics couple and and and..
Suppose we'll have to wait till he's gone
@@hans-henrikrasmussen53 Exactly !
When Paul McCartney and William Shepherd appear together in one place I may believe Paul is not dead.
Is a picture of Billy Shepherd available anywhere? Aside from the rumor monger comparison photos? A photo from before 1969?
Billy campbell
@@silverstuff182 Nope. Along with no witnesses or testimonies to his birth or existence by anyone, anywhere, *ever!* 🤷♂
RINGO STARR ADMITTED TO THE INQUIRER MAGAZINE THAT PAUL DID IN FACT DIE IN A CAR CRASH IN 1966
DUH IT DOES I WAS BEING SARCASTIC
i thought about it and should have been a little more forward.sometimes i forget that what im thinking i dont always convey it that way!!!!
*****
hows this,ringo said paul is dead but inquirer says paul was spotted on the moon jamming with aliens!!!!
+MorbidManMusic
Children- they can be so amusing. I mean annoying.
uh, it's The Enquirer with an 'e'.
Who else is here after watching a video about the unexplained glyphs in Halo 3: ODST?
just read Billies Back. A book ghosted a few years back by Sir Paul McCartney. It was published as a fiction to avoid legal problems. He explains the death of Paul McCartney in 66 and his part in rebuilding the Beatles.
...or he explains the new narrative. It's possible the car crash was a cover for Paul going underground as John Halliday or that biological JPM was murdered. I'm not so quick to buy a story from someone who was involved in a 50 year public deceit.
@@bonitastjulienlepauvre6489 John Halliday looks much like Paul McCartney would look like 40+ years after 1966. The resemblance to the original Paul is absolutely uncanny.
Yes, and John H. also has original Paul's sweet personality, which has been very hard for Beatle Bill to imitate.
Yes that's correct.
Just one fact though. J. H. had blue eyes while J. P. M. were brown.
Brian Moriarty finds that everything is a joke, a prank, a gag or a means to sell albums. He repeats these two conclusions ad nauseam. Frankly, I don't believe either conclusion. I find him to be a joke, a failed game designer. The student at Ann Arbor who came up with the idea that Paul is Dead was absolutely brilliant. What an astute observer. Of course, since then it has been proven that Faul was not Paul McCartney but Billy Campbell, or Billy Shears, or some variation thereof. Why Paul was replaced is unknown. Was Paul deliberately killed (new theory). Did Paul want out? I think the behavior of the band, the myriad clues pointed out here and a million other things demonstrate that Paul died in a car crash and was replaced by Billy Shears. Why was this done? The damn British government and Tavistock didn't want to lose this cash cow. The Beatles were a kind of Shakespeare for the island.
Paul's death would have been investigated by London's Metropolitan police very thoroughly, and without bias....HOWEVER, if orders had come down from the very top. To organize a cover up..it most certainly would have happened...The place to start checking is THE NATIONAL ARCHIVES based in KEW in south London a 10 minute walk from KEW Gardens.
thus the knightship of Faul, giving the royal seal of approval....
Although there doesn't seem to be hard evidence that Paul McCartney died in 1966, the ghost writer for "The Memoirs of Billy Shears provides over 600 pages of detailed memories regarding this theory. Historical fiction, yes. but how would a ghost writer have this much information on the PID theory???
Second, if the theory is actually true, one of the best ways to cover up the truth is to plant mysterious "Paul is Dead" clues and have "Paul" himself poke fun (David Letterman 2009, Wings interview with Linda McCartney) to make the truth sound so ridiculous that people won't believe it.
dream on...
And is admitted fiction. Where is the picture of Billy on the cover or back cover where most authors are pictured? Because there is no Billy.
It Appears our Conan Obrian Skipped about 20 other clues on the white Album......Why??? Perhaps those clues didn't fit his story or the crowd he was catering to
Paul McCarthy and John Lemon were the greatest group ever,
My favorite was always George Garrison!
What about Rongo Stone
Raul McCarbtree......Jon Lemontree......Jorge Morrrison ....and of course bingo tarr....were the Meatles........their biggest hit was "I wanna hock your hand"
LMAOF that made me laugh so hard! One of the funniest comments ever hahahaha!
I thought their hit song was "I want to handle your holder!"
they never toured because the music LIVE sucked the crowds were SO LOUD and there were NO monitors facing them they couldnt hear . and the crowds of people crushing them tearing at their clothes etc. further there are recordings of the four of them discussing touring PAUL was the ONLY one that wanted to do it .The OTHER THREE wanted no part of that craziness again. The BIGGEST problem withtheirconcerts was that they couldnt get ENOUGH EQUIPMENT OF QUALITY TO REPRODUCE THE MUSIC. AD TO THAT THE FACT THAT THEIR STUDIO WORK WAS SOUND EFFECTS,ORCHESTRAS,BACKWARD TAPING OVERDUBBING AND COULD NOT BE REPRODUCED LIVE. ANY OTHER EXCUSE IS CRAP.
Hulu has the new film showing them clearly touring and singing and playing. but except for that, maybe you are right. :)
Curt I'm NOT talking about all the touring and performing they did in the early days,maybe 2 to 3 yrs.IF you have the BBC recordings (i think its on there ,Ireally don't remember where I heard the conversations) where they are discussing touring and Paul wants to do a concert on a cruise ship where the size of the audience is limited and they MIGHT be away from the MOBS the other three guys don't want to do it . The responses rage from how impossible it is to hear each other,and how the music suffers to NOT wanting to be STUCK on a cruiseship.How do we GET AWAY? This is toward the end ,I think the result of the conversation is the famous ROOFTOP FINAL CONCERT they did .. THE AMAZING GROWTH they had as performers,musicians and composition ability has more to do with the fact of THATS ALL THEY DID FOR TWO OR THREE YEARS write ,tour,perform,record and all at the same time sometimes. ADD to that George Martin who REALLY did MOST of the orchestra arranging and fine tuning of things and there you have it.HOURS ON HOURS in the studio playing with EVERY BUTTON and EVERY KNOB AND PRE RECORDED LOOP IN THE PLACE .Remember George Martin had all kinds of noises etc at his disposal. HIS IDEA to sing the chorus ahead of the verse, the FADE IN on eight days a week etc.
Brian Moriarty's presentation here is so effin dark and disgusting
well it was a gaming presentation not intended to be for the paul is dead crowd. The crowd seemd to like his presentation. or at least they were kind enough to pretend ;)
This is *NOT* the real Brian Moriarty! The real Brian was killed in a bizarre gardening accident when he was run over by his own lawnmower ( that's why this fake Moriarty is wearing a grass green tie ). The real Brian Moriarty was 4 inches shorter too. And the colour of his shirt? Well if that isn't a *dead* giveaway I don't know what is!
jayaybe1 R.I.P. Brian 😢
kj
Jayaybe 1
Spinal Tap........great movie!
and while you wrote this we buried paul in your backyard...
The Beatles did all this after hearing what the fans were saying. As a joke.
Was he supposed to be funny???
This was a total waste of time... I loved the Beatles...
If I had been allowed the opportunity I would have been one of the young girls in the audience screaming and crying... I also can say that it would have devastated me if I had heard in 1966 Paul had died...
I didn't need to hear that though... I knew... Suddenly it was no longer Paul...
Without the rumors, the news, the articles or the birth of the internet, my heart told me this Faul was not Paul...
l do not know what happened to him,but Paul was gone...
I loved him and I have missed him a long time...
John buried him...
Ah, now I understand what happened. Paul choked to death on cranberry sauce while blowing his mind out in a car while driving barefoot when an escaped walrus forced him off the road!
+robert glenn :))) Great one!
Love it!
+robert glenn Ringoconfessed on feb 15, 2015. Check it out! And "the "Faul" interview"by George Harrison. And Pauls cold rebuttal, They replaced him for sure Ringo says! MaybeJohn photos and Cynthia said.
-William the Conqueror Have you listened closely to the Harrison interview? This is not George Harrison by any stretch. It's a poorly executed fake. I've got to check out the Ringo admission, however, given I keep hearing of it but can't seem to find it anywhere. Any idea where it is here on You Tube?
+robert glenn --Since the other day I seen plenty. There were at least two if not three Paul. I have watched 100vids. TH-cam isn't the only place. But what really convinced me is how Faul acts, his cold mean rebuttal to Ringo. And the timing of the Deaths of Four folks maybe more. I investigate conspiracy, it is what I do, This is one I thought I debunked as a teen, woops never believe the media. I'm I am the same age as THE BEATLES band born in 1962. But I remember the announcement he was dead. We never really saw the real Paul. We including you have grown up looking at FAUL. I know this from about100 hours this week which ends in FUCKME me, right when I figured it out, in walks John Halliday. Paul look and act alike grounds keeper are Paul's childhood house for the last 40?or more years! I dunno what to think now. But Faul is taller darker different everything, just look at color photos of Paul from 1964! You never seem Paul until you see a stilll color from the early days. His nose tips up, his skin light. Just look, it all fits together like a rubics cube. Throw in Fauls obsession with Alistair Crowley and there you go! I never knew this ass clown was a devil worshipper! His shit we didn't listen to is soaked with it!s. Paul spent 12 million stopping and destroying the second disc.of Anthology keep old pictures of Paul from getting out. The music has been changed its a deep hole.
That is not Cassius Clay on the Sgt.Pepper's cover, it's Sonny Liston
thank God
This guy made a compelling case, however he does not address the subtle photographic anomalies that have arisen in evidence other people have presented of the changes on Paul's face especially his chin, eyes ears and teeth...
Also the unusual way George would say Paul's name (FAUL) this cannot be a coincidence too.... And it cannot be misheard.... If you stand in front of a mirror and say Paul/Faul you will see your own lips each take a different structure... Paul will give you a pouted look Faul will give you a bottom lip curl.... George's facial position is definitely a curl.....
On reflection do I believe Paul is dead "I Don't know" we all have perfect doubles roaming around somewhere... Prime example was Saddam Hussein had doubles coming out of every orifice.... Just an example how poorly in comparison but hopefully you get my point.... However if PAUL or FAUL I personally liked the music that followed regardless of what had happened....
Yeah he left a lot of evidence out. Seems he picked the things that he could make a joke of ........some of the jokes were pretty lame too
Hard to take you seriously when you can't spell Paul's name right
O
+Jennifer Bibi long live '''''''''billy shears''''''''
Paul McCartney was a left handed,south paw,bassist of the greatest rock band The Beatles, he was an amazing singer and song writer.
Not sure what your point is. This video is for idiots who believe Paul McCartney died and was secretly replaced.
william isn't dead, he's still alive, leave bill alone.
It's easy to dispel all of this controversy as so much pareidolia and creative marketing, as the presentation has suggested. However, it's important to remember that the very definition of the word "Occult" refers to that which is hidden. The Recording Industry, Arts and Entertainment have always been heavily steeped in the Occult Realm - these realities are not simply the musings of young children and bored teenagers, there is definitely much going on here. Those who are pushing the world's various agendas via the Occult Realm do so by hiding it all in plain sight - music, movies, the arts, television, news, politics, sports, etc., it's all in there.
ok so if Paul is dead and the replacement guy died supposedly in 1977 of a drug overdose, who the hell was that guy on David Letterman's show?
The third Paul
Pattie Ford - Who married Linda Eastman then ?
+Steve Birks that was paul mcCharmley, as John Lemon would say
It's obviously so easy to replace famous stars. Paul might live forever since there are so many people look, sound, write songs, and play instruments exactly like him.
I just found out last year that PAUL McCARTNEY passed away 57years ago. Rest SIR PAUL
Correct, (1942-1966) RIP Paul
*man seriously stop mucking around in these tinfoil hat sites that prey on the easily fooled convincing them that they are the "Critical Thinkers" and that the rest of us are the unthinking sheep.*
*Going into these scammer's sites is not doing "research". I can't stress this enough.*
*I was watching Michael Williams "investigation" into how it would be impossible for them to write and record and arrange Rubber Soul from October 12th to November 15th.*
*But what he conveniently forgot to mention was the June recordings before they went into the October recordings dry.*
*That's how I know he's a scammer. As he knows that you all only get your info from those scamming sites so he left out that very well known fact from actual research from books with citations (the world is not always lying to you. We have some check sand balances. Or we use to lol)*
*And on Justice for James she actually passed off Paul's Stage IEM as a prosthetic ear and you all were dumb enough to eat that up. Lol*
*There are many many pre-1966 pictures where he has a long face. As many as the round face. It's as if you are brand new to this planet. Different angles will give you different looks. Even with pictures of yourself. Faulers are missing that nuance gene. Though his mop top did a lot of the work rounding out his face too.*
Paul has the same scar on his lip to this day since his famous ***December 26th 1965 moped accident*** which has naturally changed over a lifetime.
*A plastic surgeon would have had cut deep and rip open "Faul's lip in 1966 and we know that didn't happen as we would've noticed how deep and fresh it was. Like it was in 1965 again. Placing scars on lips to last a lifetime which changes over time (which it did) is not like putting on a never changing Lego piece.*
*And there is the little matter of your so called lookalike who needed plastic surgery to look more like Paul (according to all the varying logistically impossible malleable fantasies) yet somehow has a son James in 1977 with the***same droopy eyes, raised eyebrows and exact chin and that distinctive arched line under his brow and above his eyelids as 1963 Paul had. Stella and Mary too also have that distinctive line above their eyelids***
*And at 20 James looks exactly like 1963 Paul but with his mother's blonde hair. And then when James becomes an older man is a doppelganger to Paul's brother Michael.*
*James and Stella gets their strawberry blond reddish light features from Linda. Not from Vivian Stanshall.*
*How can James look like a disguise? Lol*
*As that is what Vivian and Faul are supposed to be. Faul with surgeries and daily latex sessions every time he goes out that his kids never seemed to have noticed (lol) and Vivian with strawberry blond reddish wigs and Hollywood prosthetics. Lol.*
*As according to your own malleable theory William is supposed to most resemble his first character Phil Avrill, bahahaha, even having to say "his first character" lowered my IQ by 50 points, lol).*
Oh and Paul's ***"Granny"*music as John liked to call it picks up at times in the 70s. His dad's music hall influences growing up (he even records his dad's only song that his dad lied about and gives it to him in the 70's as a present).
His dad at Paul's 1969 small private wedding and pictures of them together.
*Michael and Paul way in the background going to lunch not even knowing they are in the shot in Get Back*
*Paul buying that Scotland farm on June 17, 1966, etc*
*Tons of pictures him and his dad laughing together in the late 60s and 70s.*
*Google The Beatles Sweden Press conference. You'll see 1964 lefthanded Paul smoking mostly with his right hand. Also a video on Paul Is Not Dead channel of over 100 pictures of him using both hands before and after 66. Just a product of living in a right-handed world. Most prevalent in older generation lefthanders like myself and Paul.*
====
*He only got better at bass from 1966 onward because the times and music called for more complicated riffs.*
*And a lot of the time you are comparing a baby fat Paul at 22 to a Paul with no baby fat in his mid then to late 20s. Also his style and hair changed as so did the rest of our culture did in 66 onward.*
*And saying Paul is shorter than Faul is borderline simple. Every single photo that these tin foil hat sites bring forward are forced perspective illusion photos which is a natural phenomenon when people are standing beside each other and one is standing slightly in front of each other. Take a photography course sometime as it happens every day*
*Also Google The famous mockers interview in 64 where young Paul says he is 5 foot 11. Whereas you Faulers always say that Faul is 5 11 and that Paul was only 5 foot 8.*
*Do you really think they and all his friends and family are that stupid to call him Billy whenever cameras are around? It's part their dry British humor. But mostly their nickname for him since back in the day when he would sign into hotels and recording sessions as Billy Martin.*
*The logistics of what you're proposing is straight out of the mind of an adolescent child or a 60s Bond film. Any conspiracy that needs multiple doubles is a very weak conspiracy indeed.*
*If you reply TLDR I'll give you my bored yawn now.*
Paul had brown eyes. The fake Paul has green eyes. Explain that. BTW, colored contact lenses can not change brown eyes to blue or green. Also voice analysis proves it was two different voices.
Lighting, film, filters. Explained. As for "voice analysis", you're making it up (or quoting unquestioningly from someone who did, which is as bad).
@@fanorydberg2424If you examine the jawline and skull shape of old and new Paul you will see it's pretty much conclusively 2 different people.
Forensic science has proven that Paul McCartney was replaced in 1966. A scientific team in Italy consisting of Francesco Gavazzeni and Gabriella Carlesi conducted a biometrical analysis of Paul pre and post 1966. The scientists saw discrepancies in the facial features that could not be accounted for by error or plastic surgery.
They're sick.
How can anybody joke about his death if he did die?
JustForBrieLarson maybe because most people will believe anything????
He is ignorant, it’s obvious that Paul did die.
Saw the name wrong in the title, came for the comments.
+Erika Fiore (Lebonah) you need to get a life if tht's wht you came to watch this video for
chip whitley I watch videos on youtube when I want and for the reason I want and what I do with my free time is none of your business. Fact.
chip whitley no dude, just stating a fact... Guess there a bit of reverse psique going on here uh?
+chip whitley not nice man,nothing wrong with reading comments is there? :)
Now tell all the story, how about the japanese airport, the piture comparisons, eye color, height, you make this fantasy, tell the family of the young girl that was killed in that car wreck, john & faul did not like each other
So what would be your point? Two Italian forensic scientists have fundamentally proven that the guy currently calling himself Paul McCartney - isn't - or at least isnt the Paul McCartney that played with the original Beatles. All of your snarky BS is for nought therefore yeah?
why would someone call repeating the facts snarky BS? it helped a lot of people....
Yeah but who is Paul McCarthy?
Joe McCarthy's son... You remember Joe - the former Teamsters boss who disappeared without a trace in the 1970's???
Mysticswalk old! Paul, or new paul!
Billy Shears. also known as William Shears Campbel Billy and Billy Shephard. His father died back in 2006 a renowned musician. Billy played multiple instruments, and played in the studio with his father at 15 yrs old.He played He has a band that played with his good friends the Beatles in Liverpool. his band was Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots. at Merseymania. theres so much video out there.
Jeez, this crap again. Billy Pepper & the Pepperpots never played live anywhere and had no connection with The Beatles or Liverpool whatsoever. They were a bunch of studio musicians put together by Pickwick Records in 1964 to record a couple of lousy Beatlemania/Merseybeat cash-in albums. That's all they ever did.
If Billy Pepper & the Pepperpots played live with The Beatles et al then why is there not one single pic of the band playing live anywhere. Search for them - not 1 pic of BP & tPPs playing live. Also, how come nobody knows the names of anybody in this supposedly very popular band apart from this Billy Shepherd character (who is only credited with writing some of their "songs" and may well not have even played on the records in any case)?
And where exactly in Liverpool was this "Merseymania" (or "Mersey") club? Because nobody outside of the world of conspiracy videos seems to have ever heard of it. There are no other references on the internet to there ever being such a club in Liverpool, and anyone who grew up in 1960s Liverpool will tell you that no such club existed.
video of Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots at Merseymania. Wow! Provide me with a link to to them singing any song so I can check this out! By the way every band ever on a bill with the beatles in the 60's is known. They did advertise their appearances in newspapers back then. They never were at the same gig with anyone or any band named pepper. Prove me wrong.
The one and only Billy Shears.
I don't know about British culture but in America a priest or a saint or God or Jesus would have a hand over someone or something to bless it and to give the person final blessing before death. Like a baptism.
Whatever happened, the replacement Paul apparently did cooperate with putting in the clues, which would increase the chance of him being exposed.
That leaves roughly two possibilities:
1) it was all a publicity stunt
2) the rabbit hole is much deeper than we can imagine.
I was thinking that too. The replacement would have to agree to putting in the clues. You can't just sneak clues onto an album cover.
Or (3) a False Flag to lead to PID when the real mistery is WHERE is the real Paul...
It isn't a stunt, he actually is not Paul. He's Bill.
@@nokomismn9685 It's scary how many of their songs after 66 are actually Paul is dead songs. He put backmasking in almost every song. It isn't a stunt, Bill actually isn't Paul. Lennon - Double Fantasy. It is a fantasy because Paul was actually replaced by a double and no one really knew it.
this guy is full of crap...Yes Billy shears did a great job...
He sure has.
Wow...Paul McCarthy is dead! Who is Paul McCarthy?
+RB Brown relative of Andrew? heehee
there is a Paul McCarthy who is a contemporary artist btw. "Sailor's Meat, Sailor's Delight!" is one of his pieces. really cool but also freaky.
Somebody REALLY needs to set me up with this Jamoke on a radio Or TV show so that I could Blow HOWITZER holes through his whole presentation. And I could add so much more information for him that I would like to see him Struggle through and them Maybe I can get a few laughs directed at him and we could all watch him struggle when the tables are turned. SOMEONE SET UP THE DEBATE.
Why don't you go do it yourself and put on utube .make a podcast ❤.
most people write a book 1st...
Wish you would do a podcast or tube video.
rc, you hit it right on the nail.... yes, the real Pauls’ Family would have known right away that was not their Family member. It makes me angry that the stand in has benefit so much... I pray karma pays him a visit.... in many ways I think that’s way John distant him self.
This just confirms that the Beatles were quite simply BRILLIANT both in music and the arts....nothing like them before ...probably be nothing like them again. John, Paul, Ringo, and George....All You Need is Love Love Love...All You ever need is Love
Ok. Let's say that in all pictures and songs there isn't any sign or subliminal message. Then my question is: Why so many signs and pictures with sooo many characters in them? I wasn't born yesterday to believe that those things simply appear in pictures when I clearly know that all kind of stuff: songs, pictures, music videos are as handled as every detail from them.
Someone with a mind of her own. Thank you!
Just young guys messing around.
"Will the people in the cheaper seats clap your hands, and the rest of you if you just rattle your jewellery"
Jane Asher said old Paul had a much bigger Schlanger.
NOT "a history lesson" - just this guy's silly, childish opinion. He's a "game-maker", he's gaming us with superficial BS. cheers
Almost all of the PID arguments feature stunningly poor logic, such as using photographs of Paul in differing settings, at differing distances, in differing physical contexts, in differing lighting, to establish his height.
NO one with a wisp of critical thinking ability would offer those kind of arguments.
Another argument I hear is that Billy Shepard replaced Paul. Trouble is, Billy Shepard was NOT a talented singer like Paul was. Moreover, Shepard's voice sounded nothing like Paul's.
What is it about people who cling to a belief when logic and facts contradict their belief?
well, blindness is a thing...
When a video can't even get Paul's name right, there's no point in listening.
It's McCartney, not McCarthy.
hey, he even been called Paul McCharmly too...alongside John Lemon George Parasol and Ringgo Stone
+Nurlinda F Sihotang indo
This relates to something I learned the hard way when I was a teenager. Me and all my friends were nuts for KISS. They had this gimmick at the time that no one had EVER seen what they really looked like, because they always wore their makeup on stage. In all the magazines you'd see a picture of one of these assholes with their hand in front of their face, with a caption underneath saying something like, "We almost caught Paul Stanley with his guard down, but he got his hand up just in time." This went on for years. After a while KISS's record sales dropped and suddenly they came out with a new album, called, "UNMASKED." Everyone rushed to buy the new album just to see what they all looked like, and their careers took off once again. My point is that record companies do shit like this to get gullible teenagers to buy records. They plant these ridiculous stories to play us, and then sit back and watch the fun - and watch the money roll in. This was likely a gimmick that some record company exec came up with and Paul and the rest of them had nothing to do with it. They probably even complained about it, but the record company is boss.
Totally agree with what you're saying about promoting albums but in this case the bulk of the possible evidence of 'Pauls death' in album covers, songs, back masking, etc was in the years 1967-69 & it wasn't until Sept 1969 when it starting hitting the news so that theory doesn't really apply. Also they broke up the next year in April 1970 & have never reformed so it really doesn't fit the model of what your proposing.
TheCadstar How does it not fit? I proposed that it was a gimmick to sell albums. Whether or not they still performed live, or even whether or not they were still together is really irrelevant.
Rob Robert Usually gimmicks are done ahead of time to sell or promote upcoming records & such whereas in this case the bulk of their work was retrospective when the 'Paul is dead' phenomena began in Sept '69. They may have thought a gimmick of a storyline or common thread throughout their work would ensure the continued selling of their records into the future? I don't know it just seems strange to go down that track - not to mention an incredibly morbid & disturbing thing to do to one of the members by continually implying that he is possibly dead? You could be right but like i was pointing out, this was done retrospectively not preceding if you get my drift. Cheers.
Rob Robert i would love to have a free school where people like you could learn to speak without spitting fuck and other expleitives every other word without any meaning whatsover...
Seamus Mounchere Me too. Perhaps you've missed the point of all the cursing in the comment of mine of which you write. The whole purpose of the comment you mention was in response to someone doing exactly what you mistakenly accused me of doing. I was mocking him for all of HIS swearing. See the comment before mine, from connorguy. Thanks anyway.
Yeah something was going on, the Beatles were playing up the Paul is dead thing for sales.
I thought the same thing originally, till I looked and dug further. you may want to dig deeper too.
THIS WAS DONE PURPOSLY. DONT CARE WHAT ANYONE SAY, THEY PLAYED IT TO PERFECTION.
a international trolling at the highest degree. bless their troll souls. but still going to kick their feet if ever have a chance to meet them.
It is very obvious that the Beatles were intended to made a Paul is dead joke or simply tried to tell the fact....period
he said at 18.43 that it was cassius clay standing next to the black and white beatles that isnt true its sonny liston if this guy is trying to mock the theory then all he is doing relly is making a fool of himself
Moriarty didn't point out that Paul is dancing out of step with the other Beatles in the "Magical Mystery Tour" at 46:54 point of the video.
I wonder if Mr M ever saw the film by Joel Gilbert "Paul McCartney is really Dead" ?
What about all the videos of people saying "Hello Billy!" to someone who's supposed to be Paul...?
this Paul McCarthy looks a lot like Paul McCartney. strange.
A great lecture! It would help to put in the description that it debunks most of the PID theories as it starts out listing them in a way that could be taken as factual by some.
and the funniest thing, he blantantly pointed that the whole shenanigans were for sales reasons. the lecture itself is about marketing a game and game engagement. but conspiracy theorist will be paranoidly suspicious anyway wouldnt they?. love how he pointed the coy answer by Paul McCartney "not enough red roses" while blantantly holding a red rose boquet. Gosh, what a group of mischevious wankers they were
the rose bouquet was a prop for the film. And I suspect Paul secretly loved the idea of being the one to wear a different rose. It set him apart as the lead singer in the scene. John probably wished he had grabbed it first!
Someone set me up in a debate with this "fool on a hill" Pls!!!
Do it yourself and make a podcast then put it on utube.
i am also dead . I died many years ago while I was listening to the first Cher album from a heart attack and my parents replaced me with a John Lennon lookalike
cher could do that to you...
That's Sonny Liston, not Cascuis Clay. You make some good points and I always thought the conspiracy absurd.
But when Mcartney was arrested in Japan for marijuana possession and detained for 10 days because his fingerprints didn't match those on file, the thought wtf?
The DNA discrepancy in the parenity suite from his Hamburg days is rather interesting also.
Especially that he had undergone blood tests at the time and admitted to being the Father, and child support was set up to see her through her childhood years.
I always felt the so called "clues" were planted to sell product.
Record sales did spike because many kids were bying 2 copies. 1 to listen to, and one to take the brunt of playing it backwards over and over.
The Beatles certainly were in on the joke because in I'm so tired John most definitely says, Paul is a dead man, miss him, miss him, miss him, and then it's played backwards in the mix.
I always believed the Beatles played along and went with the rumor for a laugh and to sell records.
But please explain the "fingerprints" and the "DNA"situation??
Still SMH over that one.
No one has ever confirmed that his fingerprints were even taken by the Japanese authorities. It was hardly like there was any dispute about who he was! He was kept for ten days and released, which was normal. Presumably, also, it would have been too much hassle to try him. As for the DNA, I can't find that confirmed either, though he did take a blood test, which proved that either (a) he wasn't himself, or (b) someone else was the girl's father. I know which sounds more likely to me. I agree the case is messy, but then such cases often are. He didn't, incidentally, admit to being the father of Erika Hubers' daughter, but it seems Brian Epstein paid her hush money anyway. A lot of that sort of thing went on in the early days. When the Beatles were going to tour Germany in 1966, the German authorities chose to take the hush money as an admission, and insisted that if regular maintenance wasn't paid they wouldn't let Paul into the country to perform. It was in the 80s that the blood test was taken, when Bettina Hubers went back to court to ask for more maintenance. For some reason the Court ignored the negative test and made him pay anyway. Paul's lawyers appealed this and after several years and several hearings he won, but he paid the girl's huge legal fees for her, since it would have bankrupted her, which may be down to the kindness of his heart, or because it wouldn't have been a very good look. As I say, it's messy, but PID freaks would have to be desperate to claim it proved anything about Paul. I don't think, by the way, there ever were any "clues" on records or anywhere else. There really was no need to do anything to "sell product". The Beatles and everyone connected with them had more money than they knew what to do with from the mid 60s onwards. They just wanted a quiet life and maximum time in the studio.
Good Lord, people! It's O.P.P. -- Ontario Provincial Police!
sheers brought that with him from Canada...
The guitar didn't spell 'Paul?' and we can prove it: the man that created the cover says it's not. Wow, if thát isn't proof, wat is?
The continuing saga of Paul is dead. May future generations puzzle themselves over this.
Interesting. Must admit though, I’ve always wandered why Alister Crowley was included in the crowd on Sg Peppers album.
I think John was intrigued by that shit...
@@user-fc1gq5xd9eNot just John. The entire music industry - Crowley’s religion Thelema is prevalent in it.
Sean his son is in a band with dude from Primus and they are into him too it seems
This person is giving misinformation!
Read the memoirs of Billy's shears released 9/11 2009............. Car crash 9/11 1966..... Authorised by faul666 pages long
Let’s test “Paul’s” DNA and compare it tomorrow his parents’ family members.
wouldn't Harrison just call his buddy paul and NOT faul? something is strange about that.why the hell would he call billy shears "paul"? that would be weird.he calls him faul.which would mean fake paul.there are too many leads on their records to explainwhat really happened to paul McCartney.very messed up. and very sad.if the beatlescame out with the truth,their would have been a lot of suicides.look how big they were?this is some of the strangest stuff in rock music.its up there with the elvis thing.(which also has many clues to suggest he didn't die).remember its all about the money.
+james hajjar I don't think the Beatles will ever come out with the truth.Well me saying that.There is only one Beatle left Ringo Star,and like John Lennon said ''Keep one eye on Ringo''. He got more skeletons in his closet than there are in our graveyard down the road from me.Do a bit of investigating on individual people not just groups/bands,and the pieces start to fit together...Yeah I agree about the suicides,and how many there would have been back then, and also about the money side of things...Not that long after WW2,and the revenue the Beatles were bringing in to Britain at the time is unbelievable...
The stuff about Paul is only the tip of the iceberg in what is really going on in the music industry.Rollin' Stones,Led Zeppelin,Black Sabbath(some f..ked up shit by BS),well nearly all music these days: Most sing about Crime,drugs,sex,Transgender,murder,you name it,and it will be sang about, somewhere...My Daughter became transgender last year,only changed her name,but she wants the full operations...She is only 14 years old,and I'm trying to delay it for as long as I can,because I know she's not 100%.........Yep you guessed it,influenced by music..
+james hajjar anyone who would suicide over the death of a musical idol is a sad,disturbed individual.Bowie was a massive hero of mine for 30 odd years but am i gonna kill myself? that's nuts.I mean,i get what you're saying....i just think it is sad if peoples lives are that empty.You are dead right,it is all about the dosh.
Sorry about your daughter ... I had a horrible experience with Ringo in 2013. My class became Beatles fans in 1962 when we were 10. By 2013, a close friend was practically dying with cancer and had been fully devoted to Ringo until youth. Ringo toured South America at the end of the year and we arranged to attend the show. A couple of days earlier he performed unexpectedly at a downtown theater. I managed to throw a piece of paper nside his limousine scribbling the sad story of my friend's and asking whether he would take a picture with her. The following night I received a call at my cell but nobody answered. It turned out to be the phone number of a parking facility at the hotel Ringo was staying. I tried to see him the following day in vain but left letters to two of his band members with details of our seats at the concert. We never heard of him. My friend passed away the following July. I couldn't understand such mean behaviour. But if one accepts the weird things that go on in the entertainment industry, it does make sense. Take care.
While presenting some interesting facts, he sadly let's his own prejudice keep him from presenting the most telling evidence that Paul is dead.
the clues where put there and put there by the beatles knowing, wheather hes dead or not!!!!!!
Unbelievable- this guy does an hour special about the paul is dead tjing with an audience and he misses tje now 100% fact that Billy Shepard has been Paul since late 66
70s- florida college professor voice prints paul then every song after mid 66 and not one post 66 song matches prior. Voice prints like finger prints no 2 alike
- 2 italian scientist 2007 spent year going thru evidenxe with intention proving Billy was paul. After noticing many photos right after october 66 pf faul had been morphs of billy qnd paul so conclusion an active campaign to hide billy from public exists all along. So using biometric data that cannot b altered using plastic surgery things like mm between 2 lips when closed, distance between pupils they concluded 100% its impossible Billy was Paul
. if tjat doesnt clear all confusion , when it should in 2009 Billy released 2 books only available as ebook downloads no stores titled "Billy is back" and "Tje memoirs of Billy Shears, and guess what. He says paul died in a car wreck in 1966 and he Billy Shepard from Billy Pepper and the Pepperpots band was picked as his replacement mostly cause his uncle was 33rd level free mason and Tavistock created the Beatles. Billy says its presented as fiction for legal reasons and admits even today if he directly admits it pubicly even in 2009 THEY- CAN TAKE ALL several billion dollars he has. A 50 year contrsct so powerful the most famous music name is scared 50 years after. But he says the facts presented are all true and he told for 2 reasons 1) took 4 paternity tests after paul passing cause not paul but knew 3 were his from letters in pauls house and yet he couldnt tell trurh or else. 2nd - his 5 kids dont even know who their real dad is and it was his dads death bed wish someday the world knows tje incredible accomplishments his son made. So after he dies the book comes out hard back in stores
He endorces the back as Sir James Paul Mccartney, so no chance its not on up and up
well,there's an hour and 2 minutes i will never get back.
HE AVOIDS MENTION OF A HUGE CLUE....THE LYRICS TO THE SONG SGT PEPPER'S LONELY HEARTS CLUB BAND. Paul's eye color changed too, but that liar won't say it. The Beatles obviously were not allowed to say exactly what happened in speech, but in art it would be deniable. Beatles didn't play live anymore after replacement. William Shears Campbell (has other stage names) replaced Paul.
Right on !