HFSS Tutorial: Crosstalk in coupled transmission lines: Modeling & Simulation in HFSS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 21

  • @dengmao3256
    @dengmao3256 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    One note: by default, when I add the HFSS solver, the solution type is "modal", this will cause issue when assigning excitations to the lumped port. This should be changed to "terminal". Otherwise, we can't find the same setting for the lumped port.

  • @4QAZ1
    @4QAZ1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video! And the paper is very useful. Thank you very much.

  • @redknight344
    @redknight344 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video, thank you!!!

  • @jane3598777
    @jane3598777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir how to define the space between two transmission line,thank you

    • @tensorbundle
      @tensorbundle  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Coupling co-efficient will determine the distance.

    • @jane3598777
      @jane3598777 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tensorbundle thank you sir, I'm working on CSRR and SRR. Their ring gap distance.

  • @Vidduley
    @Vidduley 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the tutorial! Why did you create the radiation boundary of that exact size and position? Sorry if this is silly to ask, I'm new to HFSS

    • @tensorbundle
      @tensorbundle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Basically it was just a random-size radiation boundary. Since these are guided-wave structures, meaning radiation is negligible, so I did not care much about the criteria of placing the boundary at least quarter-wave length from the structure. But if it were an antenna, then I should have followed the distancing criteria of quarter-wave length.
      You can also use FEBI that allows to place the boundaries disregarding the distance criteria. Hope this helps.

    • @Vidduley
      @Vidduley 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@tensorbundle thank you

  • @sciencelearning2326
    @sciencelearning2326 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot, Mr.Hasan for this video, could you Make a video for the same thing "Artificial Magnetic Conductor (AMC): Reflection Phase, Unit Cell Design & Floquet Port " in CST

    • @tensorbundle
      @tensorbundle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      thanks. Yes, I will make hopefully.

  • @torique6250
    @torique6250 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we simulate odd and even modes for this example?

  • @beambitious9237
    @beambitious9237 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why near end coupling is fluctuated along a frequency?

  • @salwamah7247
    @salwamah7247 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need the original paper pls

  • @edisonkho5874
    @edisonkho5874 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir can you please share how to connect sma connector to this model(coplanar stripline?)

    • @tensorbundle
      @tensorbundle  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is not a co planar waveguide line (CPW) . This is a coupled line (differential) transmission line

  • @leoreyes5158
    @leoreyes5158 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    why in the result it goes from -20 to -60 dB?

  • @manikandanpalanivel9551
    @manikandanpalanivel9551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sir, How to find fidelity factor in CST

    • @tensorbundle
      @tensorbundle  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      www.researchgate.net/post/How-can-I-calculate-the-fidelity-factor-and-transmitted-and-received-signal-in-side-by-side-and-fece-to-face-mode-using-CST

  • @KRISHNAPALL-jy1df
    @KRISHNAPALL-jy1df 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One note: by default, when I add the HFSS solver, the solution type is "modal", this will cause issue when assigning excitations to the lumped port. This should be changed to "terminal". Otherwise, we can't find the same setting for the lumped port.