How to Find Seismic Forces Fast | Simplified Method | ASCE 7-16 | Seismic Design Example

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มี.ค. 2021
  • The second half of the lesson is perfect for those taking the PE exam!
    Seismic design can actually be pretty simple if you know where to look in the ASCE 7-16. Today the team goes step by step through the ASCE 7-16 using the simplified seismic design method. We cover a real PE exam seismic example problem that you could very well see on the EXAM! We just got new leather seats in the auditorium so get comfy, and if you're nervous about seismic, we got ice cold Avion water for ya.
    👇 SUBSCRIBE TO KESTÄVÄ ENGINEERING’S TH-cam CHANNEL 👇
    / @kestava_engineering
    For business inquiries email: kestavallc@gmail.com
    Connect with me on LinkedIn 👇
    / richard-racz-pe-620b1792
    Civil PE exam will be here before you know it!
    (Check NCEES website to confirm time, date, and location!!)
    NCEES Website 👇
    ncees.org/
    Brave Browser 👇
    brave.com/
    (I am not affiliated or receive compensation from Brave)
    Music I Use 👇
    www.epidemicsound.com/
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    Disclaimers: Richard Racz, P.E. does not hold the title "structural engineer". Any claim of it in the videos or descriptions is unintentional and is superseded by the title "civil engineer" in the states of MA and OR.
    The Kestävä Engineering TH-cam page is intended for informational purposes only. Nothing contained in, or provided through, this TH-cam page is intended to constitute advice, or to serve as a substitute for the advice of an engineering professional. Any reliance you place on such information is strictly at your own risk.
    Under no circumstances will Kestävä Engineering be responsible or liable in any way for any content, including but not limited to, any errors or omissions in the content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of any content communicated on this TH-cam page.
    #Seismic #structuralengineer #earthquakeengineering

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @90clemson
    @90clemson 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful. Keep up the great work.

  • @oldpretoriagmailcom
    @oldpretoriagmailcom 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jose been waiting for this one!

  • @jkslam000
    @jkslam000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is so helpful. Thank you so much!

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you're very welcome Jay Kim! thanks for being a member of team kestava!

  • @chris12159
    @chris12159 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love your video! best channel for PE on youtube!!! wait for your wind load calculation =P

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wind examples coming up! I know I've been promising wind for a while now. Thanks for being a senior team member Yu Chung and supporting this channel!

  • @ehabaltimimi660
    @ehabaltimimi660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Perfect

  • @danielstoesser341
    @danielstoesser341 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is the value for W always added straight accross or would you ever use load combinations?

  • @mohdshadab-ug2ut
    @mohdshadab-ug2ut 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, how apply this base shear to each member of structure....

  • @komaldeepsingh3265
    @komaldeepsingh3265 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The code says the portion of deal load load assigned to level x (not the full dead load). I guess since they are asking for the nearest value, so 2000 is the closet one.
    But In real life scenario for same example, it will be the dead load of floor 2 + walls + roof (in other words, all the dead load above that point). Is that right?

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      its the DL at that level, which would be the floor + 1/2 walls from below and 1/2 walls from above.

  • @RobertoRojas-os5gk
    @RobertoRojas-os5gk 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    your answer does not match with the answers A thru D???

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Robert go to 7:05 that is the answer for the problem but then I add additional information to go outside of the problem to explain seismic forces

  • @rjkebz312
    @rjkebz312 ปีที่แล้ว

    The title is misleading. This is only applicable to structures located in none seismic prone area.

    • @Kestava_Engineering
      @Kestava_Engineering  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      sorry for the confusion - this is the simplified method (which is only permitted for seismic design category A)

    • @maciejcichy6018
      @maciejcichy6018 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Kestava_Engineering I think it is not only for A. In 12.14.1.1 it includes A, B, C, D, if a building has maximum 3 stories above grade, and meets other conditions. It should be usfule for light frame residential, as for that type share walls offsets are permited (up to 2 storyes). This method is used in WFCM for dwellings in table 2.6.