So glad that this is chambered in .32 H&R Magnum. I love that cartridge, thanks for continuing to support it! I'm seeing it on my local gun store shelves alot more now.
You folks working with S&W is the best thing ever in the firearms market. I love what is coming out these days! The true new golden age of firearms started the day that S&W started to drop the internal lock.
I have one of the original ultimate carry J frames in 38 Special and it’s an amazing revolver. Really glad Lipsey’s is doing collabs with Smith & Wesson like this. Good stuff.
It's nice to see S&W making some 32 caliber chamberings... but it'd be nice if they also offered .32 Fed magnum as well as the H&H. Either way, I say good riddance to the internal locks.
I hope all these new .32 revolvers from Lipsey's and Taurus spur a revival of both the .32 H&R and .32 S&W Long. The .32 H&R is an ideal snubnose cartridge; it's actually FUN to shoot out of a lightweight snub, while still having adequate power.
PLEASE GET THESE AND THE OTHER NEW REVOLVERS ON THE CA LIST! PS - You might include the plain white big dot front sight(like the 43C & 351C) for those of us who won't shoot blind in the dark.
Not me. I've fired .327 Federal out of my Taurus 327, and while it's not unmanageable, it has a lot of bark. .32 H&R is much more pleasant, especially out of a snub.
I'm curious if the 32 H&R Mag has any erosion risk ammo limitations with that titanium cylinder, similar to the 357 Mag Model 340 PD where you are not advised to shoot a sub-120gr bullet. Then again, it's a relatively low pressure cartridge compared to 357 Mag, so I would assume not.
Don't. The 442 is as capable as these offerings maybe better if it is cut for moon clips. These lighter variants are just lighter, and I would have to see for myself what it's going to get me more in performance. Light doesn't always mean more or better.
Question= have two of the original S&W UC 632 revolver's can i buy a titanium cylinder for mine ??? and the lost river 100 grain wadcutters shoot point of aim Point of inpact , LIKE A LAZER ! And two boxes of 50 each shipped to your door for one hundred is a super bargain. Besides that Ted the owner is a great guy . My carry ammo for sure
It's mostly because people who buy J frames buy the aluminum frame versions rather than the steel frame ones. 327 Federal requires a steel frame as it is a very high pressure round. Stepping down to 32 H&R let's them roll out these super light revolvers. Personally, I don't mind because mine only shoots 32 Long. XD
Excellent upgrade. However, this _titanium_ cylinder should have been included in the original Ultimate Carry setup. Not an entirely "new" model as you have done. _We The People_ suggested a thoroughly lightweight package from the start. But you [Lipsey's and S&W] did not listen. Doubling-down is never a good approach to marketing. Nobody wants to experience buyers remorse. Nor do they enjoy the process of selling a prior purchase. [SMH] Stay classy my friends.
@@graywind4326 I don't even like super lightweight, personally... My Cobra at 25 ounces is certainly light enough - but not too light - and it's a .38 Special. I don't like too light - but just right.
The grips on my 340PD are 'secret service' wood. NO GRIP on a 340 pd is gonna make you want to shoot the thing a lot. So what? The purpose of the 340PD has zero to do with shooting comfortably. If the 125 grain .357 round does not stop em? who cares ? you probly set em on fire anyway.
Titanium cylinders suck. They limit ammunition options. Plus smith is not helpful if you have any ammunition issues. They point fingers at the ammo supplier who in turn points the finger at smith. No thanks. I love my j frame but not with a titanium cylinder.
in....my....opinion All J frames are the 'ultimate' and... all J frames shoot exactly the same... to point of aim. soo? not sure I want one with anything like an adjustable sight. Also... in my ... opinion... the 340PD is the height of carry J frames. I bought mine when they first came out. The 'experts' panned the gun for hurting their hands ... and yes.. it is one horrible recoiling monster but? Who cares? I have shot dozens of J frames. I don't practice with the 340PD I might have 500 rounds tops through it.. 50k through J frames? all the same my friend. and in ....my....opinion based on my experience... you not only don't feel recoil when things are tense but you really don't hear the blast much. But also. the best gun for dangerous situations is the one you have on you. at 12 ounces it is easy to forget I have the 340 PD on me in my front pocket of my jeans. If there is any gun that is better for carry and power and convenience I am not aware of it.
@@doranmaxwell1755 lol one... just said .357 with no context so I answered with no context.. two would rather carry a g19 or sig 365 over any .357 mag and three shot placement is king. Like you said in your post "recoiling monster" because its good for you doesn't mean its the best for everyone, can your wife use it if necessary and get shots on target? I love the 340PD just not the end all be all gun. Shout out to Lipseys for making guns the rest of us want to see I am sure they will sell fast like the original UC's.
Love what Lipsey and S&W are doing!
So glad that this is chambered in .32 H&R Magnum. I love that cartridge, thanks for continuing to support it! I'm seeing it on my local gun store shelves alot more now.
Lipsey's is killing it! Great job bringing what people want to market!
You folks working with S&W is the best thing ever in the firearms market. I love what is coming out these days! The true new golden age of firearms started the day that S&W started to drop the internal lock.
I have one of the original ultimate carry J frames in 38 Special and it’s an amazing revolver. Really glad Lipsey’s is doing collabs with Smith & Wesson like this. Good stuff.
Lipsey might be the only thing keeping S&W innovating with its revolvers.
finally a good rear sight on a j frame.
The 640 Pro Series has had this for years, (And no lock,) but it's nice to see it elsewhere. I wish every J-frame had the option of these sights.
@ true but none on the light weight models. i think they all need that sight.
I got the 632 Ultimate Carry that dropped last year and I love it. Glad to see they are trying to improve the platform even further.
Please keep up the good work! Love the Ultimate Carry series, and this is a great addition! Looking forward to the M629 Mountain Revolver as well!
Love Lipsey's Revolvers!
2025 starts a golden age!!
Massive win for Hamre Forge!
It's nice to see S&W making some 32 caliber chamberings... but it'd be nice if they also offered .32 Fed magnum as well as the H&H. Either way, I say good riddance to the internal locks.
Very nice! Love the 32 and the light weight.
Doing things that Smith & Wesson should have excellent work !
Lipsey's is in tune with their exclusive releases I love the 3" engraved Pythons they made in conjunction with Tyler Gun works last year.
I really like the hamre forge hook grips!
I hope all these new .32 revolvers from Lipsey's and Taurus spur a revival of both the .32 H&R and .32 S&W Long. The .32 H&R is an ideal snubnose cartridge; it's actually FUN to shoot out of a lightweight snub, while still having adequate power.
Now I want one of these,
also!
Lipseys is a godsend for revolver aficionados. What a great time for revolvers!
I wish they would do this with a 638
I’d love a scandium framed 638 with some sights. The 638’gets no love even though it’s THE BEST model j frame.
I wish they do m&p 340&360 but 327
That's my next gun purchase. Seen a few video's about serious quality control issues though. Think I'll wait a year or two.
Beautiful work
Lipseys needs a new hat. MRGA Making revolvers great again. Best couple of weeks in the revolver world we have had in a very long time. Thanks Jason.
I actually want something all steel/ stainless steel and heavier for better recoil control and shooting hotter loads.
Yes a j frame could be better if they would put a protective steel insert around the cylinder latch hole. This area can wallow out with use.
Preach that gospel!
neat!
PLEASE GET THESE AND THE OTHER NEW REVOLVERS ON THE CA LIST!
PS - You might include the plain white big dot front sight(like the 43C & 351C) for those of us who won't shoot blind in the dark.
I have the 432 and love it!!
I love it!
Gotta get one !
Make these in 9mm!
Only an ounce lighter than it's regular air weight counterpart, but it is neat 🤷♂️
.327 Federal is what folks want 🤠.
Not me. I've fired .327 Federal out of my Taurus 327, and while it's not unmanageable, it has a lot of bark. .32 H&R is much more pleasant, especially out of a snub.
No, No they don't. Not necessary, and have to make it heavier.
Yes please! Bring back the 632 J-Frame in .327 FedMag
It’s a dying cartridge. It’ll be buried right next to 30 Super Carry
ohhhh wow buying this been looking for a 332ti for so long
Sweet!🇺🇸✌️
Can we purchase just the titanium cylinder? Someone shouldn't have to offload their new one for a loss to get the improvement.
awesome!!
.32 h&r Model 15 soon? 😂 excited for S&W to be producing guns in this cartridge!
You should do a 638 , no key lock, hi viz sights in 38 spl
I love the blend of innovation and classic creations were doing with SW revolvers. Might have to put my python away because of it.
Can you sell just the titanium cylinders for those of us that already bought the first model?
Do a 360 or 340pd with these sights
I'm surprised you guys put your name on another S&W project after the abysmal disaster of QC issues from the first run of "Ultimate Carry" revolvers
Well, I bought the first one, now I'm gonna buy this one too I guess! Anyone wanna buy my old one?
I’ll take it
I'm curious if the 32 H&R Mag has any erosion risk ammo limitations with that titanium cylinder, similar to the 357 Mag Model 340 PD where you are not advised to shoot a sub-120gr bullet. Then again, it's a relatively low pressure cartridge compared to 357 Mag, so I would assume not.
I would look at buying one if the cheapest ammo wasn’t almost double the price of 5.56
Looks really nice, but for over $800 its going to be very niche market.
Any possibility you’ll be making this in 327 Fed Mag?
Watching this with a 340PD in my front pocket, Lol.
Awesome. How much do they cost, and how much does the ammo cost?
You did good picking Hamre Forge grips. Pronounced “Ham-Ree” btw
Now just can not decide, lipseys new .32 in the LCR or the UC with titanium!
What’s the price point for this awesome-looking snubby?
Why does it say on Smith and Wessons website it is 16.6 oz and the original is less weight at 16.3 oz?
Wonder if those grips will be available as aftermarket item for original UC models?
Will there ever be a 3” model in .32hr?
Pocket guns with 3 inch barrels don’t really sell
Of course after I bout the first 2😂
Do these and the other ones fit in standard holsters?
Id get one in 327 federal
When will these be available?
Im sure this will be a lot cheaper than the S&W 340PD, but not quite as light. But is it smaller?
"Ultimate Carry" should have a cylinder cut for moon clips.
Damn! Well, I'm selling my Performance Center 442
How much?
Don't. The 442 is as capable as these offerings maybe better if it is cut for moon clips. These lighter variants are just lighter, and I would have to see for myself what it's going to get me more in performance. Light doesn't always mean more or better.
@@williamryan9195 I agree!
Question= have two of the original S&W UC 632 revolver's can i buy a titanium cylinder for mine ??? and the lost river 100 grain wadcutters shoot point of aim Point of inpact , LIKE A LAZER !
And two boxes of 50 each shipped to your door for one hundred is a super bargain.
Besides that Ted the owner is a great guy . My carry ammo for sure
For those of us that already bought the standard 432UC, can we purchase the cylinder to swap into our existing guns?
When did S&W drop the .327FedMag chamberings? This seems like a step down
It's mostly because people who buy J frames buy the aluminum frame versions rather than the steel frame ones. 327 Federal requires a steel frame as it is a very high pressure round. Stepping down to 32 H&R let's them roll out these super light revolvers. Personally, I don't mind because mine only shoots 32 Long. XD
Around the same time the rest of the shooting industry and consumers did. It’s a dying cartridge
Rather have a 10 round Lcp max for 300 bucks. Oh yeah 10 oz.
Will these be full of issues like the originals were ?
The original isn't heavy.
I like the sights on these so thats a nice upgrade but besides that, ya i dont see these as an upgrade
The titanium sucks to take care of
Why is that?
I’ve never had anything titanium so I’m genuinely curious.
Excellent upgrade.
However, this _titanium_ cylinder should have been included in the original Ultimate Carry setup. Not an entirely "new" model as you have done.
_We The People_ suggested a thoroughly lightweight package from the start. But you [Lipsey's and S&W] did not listen.
Doubling-down is never a good approach to marketing. Nobody wants to experience buyers remorse. Nor do they enjoy the process of selling a prior purchase.
[SMH]
Stay classy my friends.
It would have cost even more and just killed the deal for many. The ultimate pursuit of light weight gets ridiculous after a certain point.
The classiest🤌
@@graywind4326 I don't even like super lightweight, personally... My Cobra at 25 ounces is certainly light enough - but not too light - and it's a .38 Special. I don't like too light - but just right.
Wow
Can J-frames get any better than this??
Yes they can, Lcr in 327fm or k6s in 357.
@Stew-rl9qk Interesting, I've never heard of those J-frames before! 🙄
Who the hell is complaining about the weight of a J frame?
Wt is a issue if you carry in summer or ☀️ weather. I live in Florida 🏖 ...J frames help. Tuffy safety orange speed strips .....
should be 327 federal.
SW is starving
There was awful quality control on the last UC release. Buyer beware. S&W customer service is lacking.
The grips on my 340PD are 'secret service' wood. NO GRIP on a 340 pd is gonna make you want to shoot the thing a lot. So what? The purpose of the 340PD has zero to do with shooting comfortably. If the 125 grain .357 round does not stop em? who cares ? you probly set em on fire anyway.
Aren't these the 38 special and 32 h&r only?
@@logangodofcandy yes they are.
Can you put a optic on ittoo
Lol
About as sensible as asking if it takes Glock mags.
Titanium cylinders suck. They limit ammunition options. Plus smith is not helpful if you have any ammunition issues. They point fingers at the ammo supplier who in turn points the finger at smith. No thanks. I love my j frame but not with a titanium cylinder.
Heavier than a 340pd and in .32 mouse. Much ado about nothing.
6 shots, easier to shoot well.
@@josephpepper3087 these so called ‘tough guys’ have such a hard time wrapping their head around that concept
in....my....opinion All J frames are the 'ultimate' and... all J frames shoot exactly the same... to point of aim. soo? not sure I want one with anything like an adjustable sight. Also... in my ... opinion... the 340PD is the height of carry J frames. I bought mine when they first came out. The 'experts' panned the gun for hurting their hands ... and yes.. it is one horrible recoiling monster but? Who cares? I have shot dozens of J frames. I don't practice with the 340PD I might have 500 rounds tops through it.. 50k through J frames? all the same my friend. and in ....my....opinion based on my experience... you not only don't feel recoil when things are tense but you really don't hear the blast much. But also. the best gun for dangerous situations is the one you have on you. at 12 ounces it is easy to forget I have the 340 PD on me in my front pocket of my jeans. If there is any gun that is better for carry and power and convenience I am not aware of it.
nobody wants a $1000 j frame, unless they make it more affordable for the average person these will be better options.
@@donjohnl9632 uh.... last word. .357
@ oh caliber war is it, 9mm for the win!
@@donjohnl9632 um... two things... one... you cant get the guns in the vid in 9mm and two 9mm is not as potent as .357 mag.
@@doranmaxwell1755 lol one... just said .357 with no context so I answered with no context.. two would rather carry a g19 or sig 365 over any .357 mag and three shot placement is king. Like you said in your post "recoiling monster" because its good for you doesn't mean its the best for everyone, can your wife use it if necessary and get shots on target? I love the 340PD just not the end all be all gun. Shout out to Lipseys for making guns the rest of us want to see I am sure they will sell fast like the original UC's.