Scary Reason Why Japan is Testing a New Massive Railgun

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.พ. 2024
  • Welcome back to the FLUCTUS channel for a discussion about rail gun technology and how countries like Japan and the U.S. are looking to incorporate it into their militaries.
    Fluctus is a website and TH-cam channel dedicated to sea geeks. Whenever you are curious or an incorrigible lover of this mysterious world, our videos are made for you !
    We publish 3 videos a week on our TH-cam channel and many more articles on our website.
    Feel free to subscribe to not miss any of our updates and visit our website to discover additional content.
    Don’t forget to follow us on twitter:
    / fluctusofficial
    Please keep the comments section respectful. Any spam, insults or troll will be deleted.
    To contact us, make sure to use our email in the about section of this channel.

ความคิดเห็น • 473

  • @user-xo2rp1tu3n
    @user-xo2rp1tu3n หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    I'm Japanese and love military, so I'll explain.
    One of the reasons Japan is developing railguns is to counter China's large stock of IRBMs and HGVs. The Ministry of Defense believes that "to intercept HGVs, it is important for the interceptor to also head to the rendezvous point at hypersonic speeds," and a railgun with a long range and the ability to shoot continuously is the perfect solution. Although it is not shown in the video, research is also being done on vehicle-mounted railguns, and they are being considered for the defense of air bases and ports.
    And as you may have noticed if you watch the video, Japan's railguns are smaller than those being researched in the United States and other countries. The caliber is about 40mm, which reduces the range and power, but it has succeeded in reducing the wear on the barrel and the power required. And this is enough for anti-aircraft use.
    Research is still ongoing, but practical application may not be that far away.
    I wrote this sentence using Google Translate, so I'm sorry if it's difficult to read.

    • @thatguy46744
      @thatguy46744 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Just wait until they start equiping tanks with them.

    • @Lunas2525
      @Lunas2525 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Yeah the us was for some reason stuck on using rail guns in place of missiles or big battleship guns. Where lighter target guns would be far easier.

  • @SeaJay_Oceans
    @SeaJay_Oceans 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +289

    Japan has the right to defend itself.

    • @hagankeys3610
      @hagankeys3610 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Every country the has the right to defend itself from the warmonger, the bully and the occupier.

    • @oppoooppo7793
      @oppoooppo7793 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who's going to attack him,
      China, Korea or others Asian countries?
      If China wants to attack Japan he doesn't have to wait until 2024, really stupid.

    • @commentsedited
      @commentsedited 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Ya know what?
      Japan can do what ever they want to do..rights have nothing to do with anything. This isn't a 1 world government that says it is OK to do something
      That is the difference between you and I. I think for myself. You only think what you are told to.

    • @donntabale2054
      @donntabale2054 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Agree 1,000,000 %

    • @kulkrafts3143
      @kulkrafts3143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      All nations have right to defend themselves, but nations with ambition to acquire neighbors territories should not be encouraged to develop offensive capabilities. Nations with repeated past war crimes and unapologetic past war crimes should be watched cautiously.

  • @peterc3143
    @peterc3143 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +107

    Well done Japan 👍

  • @Carambolero
    @Carambolero 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    "Japan is ...". 90% of the video about Mericans.

    • @ThatWasFiR3
      @ThatWasFiR3 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      America actually doesn’t come into the video until the halfway mark so id say it’s 50/50

    • @thevikingwarrior
      @thevikingwarrior 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Japan and the United Kingdom, should send a message to the Americans to stop making so much fucking noise. I have heard stories coming out of Japan about them being disrupted by Americans miss-behaving there (drunk, crashing aircraft, making noise etc). Over here in the East of the UK, where I have live; the aircraft noise has made our lives utter Hell. I have no issue with America flying aircraft and working with us as alley, but I just want them to fly over the god damn ocean and try and keep the noise down!

    • @JIMDEZWAV
      @JIMDEZWAV หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The U.S gave up on Railgun's in 2021 to focus its limited resources on hypersonic missiles instead.

    • @bricology
      @bricology หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thevikingwarrior -- _this_ American has been to Japan many times, not to mention all over Europe, throughout the UK, etc.
      Are there some Americans who misbehave while overseas? Sure. The same goes for Brits, Aussies, Germans, et al -- whom I have personally witnessed being loud, drunken idiots -- especially in places like Amsterdam and Bangkok. In Japan? Not so much. Most Americans (and Brits, et al) are fairly quiet and respectful there.
      As for aircraft noise: all jets are pretty similar when it comes to the noise levels, and let's not forget that the jet engine was a British invention, so you can thank your fellow Briton Frank Whittle for the noise. The RAF has over 300 jets and nearly as many helis, so it's not like if the yanks left everything would be peaceful in the skies over Britain.

    • @thevikingwarrior
      @thevikingwarrior หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bricology You are seriously miss-interpreting my comment. This wasn't intended as a British person attacking Americans comment. I actually like many aspects of America. I just want thier airforce staff to have some respect over our country! Like many countries, there is good and bad in America; unfortunately this particular problem is bloody shit!

  • @Nerdburger85
    @Nerdburger85 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +155

    Japan just needs to build a giant robot already lol

    • @ironlegion1580
      @ironlegion1580 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Gangsta till we jaguar china

    • @user-px2cp5xr8n
      @user-px2cp5xr8n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      横浜に ガンダム あるよ♪

    • @RicondaRacing
      @RicondaRacing 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-px2cp5xr8n that's cool.

    • @King_Flippy_Nips
      @King_Flippy_Nips 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe if they didnt abandon they technology industry they could.

    • @vanelruxys8358
      @vanelruxys8358 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Build a gundam with nuclear fussion engine please

  • @sethstriker
    @sethstriker 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    Greetings from America. Japan is a pillar of dependable Allies. We value Japan for far more than just its social contributions. We align in all matters of military concerns.

    • @nicholasklangos9704
      @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amazing huh when you realize that just 70 odd years ago we were actively trying to wipe each other out,, especially that only five years after WW2 Japan heavily supported us during the Korean War!,

    • @nicholasklangos9704
      @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing huh when you realize that just 70 odd years ago we were actively trying to wipe each other out,, especially that only five years after WW2 Japan heavily supported us during the Korean War!,

    • @nicholasklangos9704
      @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing huh when you realize that just 70 odd years ago we were actively trying to wipe each other out,, especially that only five years after WW2 Japan heavily supported us during the Korean War!,

    • @nicholasklangos9704
      @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing huh when you realize that just 70 odd years ago we were actively trying to wipe each other out,, especially that only five years after WW2 Japan heavily supported us during the Korean War!,

    • @nicholasklangos9704
      @nicholasklangos9704 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing huh when you realize that just 70 odd years ago we were actively trying to wipe each other out,, especially that only five years after WW2 Japan heavily supported us during the Korean War!,

  • @dwitty_hi
    @dwitty_hi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    千島列島は日本の領土です!🇺🇦🤝🇯🇵 💪⚡🔥

    • @scouts8081
      @scouts8081 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ur a bot

    • @scouts8081
      @scouts8081 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Japan is us territory 🎉 we own you

    • @user-zq3qp8bt1x
      @user-zq3qp8bt1x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@scouts8081ありがとう!
      🇯🇵🤝🇺🇦 ❤️💪

    • @NASChan72
      @NASChan72 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ウクライナは関係ないだろ。歴史を知る日本人として恥ずかしい

    • @Tomo-gl4fh
      @Tomo-gl4fh หลายเดือนก่อน

      @user-zq3qp8bt1x
      日本はアメリカの領土だ。
      俺たちがお前らを有してるんだぜって言われてるんですよ。

  • @user-xt5lv7db5u
    @user-xt5lv7db5u 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    日本は最後までやり遂げろ。

  • @BHS25
    @BHS25 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Railguns on Military ships we will likely see Modern Battleship return armed with Railguns instead of ordinary one.

    • @LoserInChief
      @LoserInChief 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Guided missiles and aircraft will always be more flexible and have greater range than a fixed gun on a slow ship. Battleships were obsolete relics almost 100 years ago, Pearl Harbor proved that. There will never be another ship that uses gun turrets as its primary firepower, let alone a massive battleship, useless for anything else. Modern navies use multi-role vessels, and have layered defenses.

    • @Taira-no_Noritune
      @Taira-no_Noritune 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@LoserInChief
      1) Pearl Harbour was meant like political trap so that US can start war with Japan without being one declaring it. Battleships in PH were just sactifices for that provocation.
      2) Almost all airplane battleship kills in WW2 happened in situations, where one side had major or total air superiority.
      3) To sink Tirpitz, Brits needed more than 5 operations and over 800 tons of bombs total to sink
      4) Sinking Yamato took fighter wings of 4 US aircraft carriers, so it was 1 vs 4 fight. Musashi perished in a fight with fighter wings from 5 carriers.
      Real reason why battleships failed in WW2 was not that they were obsolete, but because fleet commanders either used their battleships incorrectly or acted indecisive trying to "spare them for the final battle", hiding in fjords or lagoons and doing other stuff. In other words purely human factor.

    • @LoserInChief
      @LoserInChief 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Taira-no_Noritune And yet, no navy has used a Battleship in active duty in decades, nor are any planned to be built. None of what you said changes that, or the fact that BB are not a valuable asset in a modern navy, railguns or no.

    • @Taira-no_Noritune
      @Taira-no_Noritune 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LoserInChiefIt had more to do with politics. Before crisis of first half of 20th century, there was system of what was known as Great Powers, that competed against each other but also held civilized world in ppolitical and military balance. Battleships were a product of naval arms race between those Great Powers. After WWII, Great Powers largely ceased being great and old system got replaced with system of "East bloc vs West bloc", which resulted in less independence for countries, changes to military doctrines etc. Only countries that could potentially produce a battleship were US and USSR, but former just kept their WWII battleship operational as long as cold war lasted, while latter just did not have the right know-how and deemed it to be too costly to be worth it.
      Nowadays, the status quo system is changing again and we might soon find ourselves in a world more similar than pre-WWI once again.

    • @MRU112
      @MRU112 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Integrate it into a satellite like the rods from God.

  • @edholubasch102
    @edholubasch102 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This was posted in March of this year of this year! Like listening to how the microwave was

  • @user-qx3uc4oj8p
    @user-qx3uc4oj8p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    Tell me again the scary reason that Japan is testing railguns !! This devolved into a discussion of US Laser and Railgun technology.

    • @brokens1097
      @brokens1097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      A silly diatribe can be easily passed off as an explanation with the right audience. Shame how common that audience has become.

    • @Belaziraf
      @Belaziraf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      It's scary because they have a functional Gundam for ground fights and will equip them with railguns ! 😁😁

    • @JonS
      @JonS 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      They forgot to put in that bit to the final edit. The scary reason is Japan’s Navy has detected signs of Godzilla waking up from his slumber in the Sea of Japan.

    • @Northidahoshorts
      @Northidahoshorts 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      it's to counter hypersonic missles made by china and north korea.

    • @seriesMobile369
      @seriesMobile369 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      コレが実際を仮定して数十年長引く戦争を僅か一週間で国を終わらすことの出来る兵器

  • @garymiller5937
    @garymiller5937 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Sounds like a fabulous weapon if they get the power figured out! 😊😊😊😊😊❤❤❤❤❤ Thanks 😊 for the video and update.

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The Zumwalt class destroyer (DDG 1000) was specifically design for inclusion of railguns. However, there have been so many issues with railguns and other issues that the initial plan for 32 Zumwalt class ships was cut to just 3 before the program was cancelled. Of the three existing Zumwalt class ships, NONE are planned to actually have a railgun installed. In addition, the projectile cost estimate was of $100,000 EACH. If that's not bad enough, the plasma generated by abruptly discharging so much power eroded the 'barrel' too quickly to warrant its implementation. As neat as it sounds, railguns will rake far longer to become operational in field than, say, MEGAwatt class lasers.

  • @dynestis2875
    @dynestis2875 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting how the USA "cancelled" their railgun project, yet now Japan is making progress on the tech.

  • @JanoTuotanto
    @JanoTuotanto 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So what was the scary reason?
    Radioactive dinosaurs?
    Hexagonal space angels?

    • @chad_dogedoge
      @chad_dogedoge 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is that a jojo reference?

  • @averdadeestalafora.2578
    @averdadeestalafora.2578 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    Japão é uma potência.
    Parabéns japao😊

  • @JustinStLouis-xz7ut
    @JustinStLouis-xz7ut 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    America doesn't even have a high-speed train rail. What makes you think they stood a chance at being first? The navy cancelled that challenge.

  • @IMGreg..
    @IMGreg.. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Design an put a small reactor on the ZW and power is no longer an issue.

    • @zapa1pnt
      @zapa1pnt 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Possibly, a dedicated reactor, for the rail systems.

    • @petersilva037
      @petersilva037 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@zapa1pnt heck just use one from a submarine... no new design needed.

    • @Kpar512
      @Kpar512 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think that was the original plan. Time for a TMSR modular reactor.

    • @o.w.i.m
      @o.w.i.m 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      .. The US supposedly has two Battleship hulls kept functional by order of congress.. so why talk about the zumwalt at all?
      From all that's been said the zumwalt class was/is defective.. also well Battleships have always been more a long range bombardment vessel anyways, more so than an actual effective sea vs sea battler. Bigger ship more space for power and ammo and so on. I'd think it would all be about cheap sustainable long range bombardment capability.

  • @NGC-7635
    @NGC-7635 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I highly doubt anyone can engineer a satellite that can survive being shot out of a railgun and still function properly.

  • @junsato8929
    @junsato8929 22 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Japan has the right to develop counter-Godzilla measures. I mean, how else are we supposed to make the next movie??

  • @user-AB316
    @user-AB316 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    もはや火薬で弾を飛ばす兵器は無くなり電磁石の応用となるのか?

  • @cpcattin
    @cpcattin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Following WW2 Japan needed a period of years of reflection concerning their relationship with the rest of the world. They have been successful in that effort.

    • @6haha
      @6haha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂they never apologize for it

    • @alcapone9550
      @alcapone9550 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@6haha Like the US ...

    • @6haha
      @6haha 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alcapone9550 so it will be remembered by Chinese people forever.

    • @NanimitendaYo281
      @NanimitendaYo281 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@6haha Therefore it is easy for the Chinese Communist Party to control the people.

    • @SophiaLegro
      @SophiaLegro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@6haha
      Just don’t understand why Chinese people cannot use the internet to find out how many times the Japanese has apologized to the Chinese!?🤔🤔🤔

  • @Frank36560
    @Frank36560 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    So what was the reason Japan is testing a massive railgun? What was the scary reason? Did I miss that part?

    • @thevikingwarrior
      @thevikingwarrior 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no scary reason, it is just a military research project and they are not our enermy.

  • @WSallai
    @WSallai 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    The fact that Japan places a percentage of their massive GDP into Defense allows them to have a massive Navy and aircraft.

    • @charlesdignam780
      @charlesdignam780 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      If I were the Chinese, I would not want to fight the Japanese Navy. They have excellent ships and weapons and they mean business.

    • @seanbrazell7095
      @seanbrazell7095 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It means they WILL have that, but that has literally just begun. Given their population apocalypse - and their awesome anime predilection for robotic soldiers and weapons - I'd say much of that money will go directly into that kind of military tech.

    • @michaelmccarthy4615
      @michaelmccarthy4615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US protects Japan from China.

    • @Mentaculus42
      @Mentaculus42 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      And what percentage of GDP is that ⇔ 1.1% vs US of 3.5%. Now if you sum-up that over 75 years, Japan has had it easy and basically let the US taxpayers pay the bill. Now that China is outspending Japan over 10 to 1 (in equivalence ratio), the resources that Japan is expending is just sad.

    • @michaelmccarthy4615
      @michaelmccarthy4615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The US protects Japan from China.

  • @jessier3602
    @jessier3602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +41

    Japan has the right to protect itself from China's Agression and the US and NATO alliance supports Japan

    • @byhyew
      @byhyew 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Japan is arming itself to expell the American occupiers... Anyone thinking Japanese military has anything remote to do with China is being fooled....

    • @user-wj1lc8co4r
      @user-wj1lc8co4r 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      IGNORANT

    • @jessier3602
      @jessier3602 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@user-wj1lc8co4r Who You?Every freedom loving nation has the right to protect itself according to the United Nations Laws

    • @justyuyun1557
      @justyuyun1557 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why do you think US and NATO not a threat to Japan independence?

    • @herbertwedelmann395
      @herbertwedelmann395 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bullshit, there is no Agression of China. It´s a lie of the japanes marionettes of USA.

  • @michaelmccarthy4615
    @michaelmccarthy4615 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The US has stopped development on the rail gun.
    Missles are cheaper, more accurate, and flexible.

    • @IMGreg..
      @IMGreg.. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The projectile was only $100K vs $200k to $2 million.
      May be a reduction in size of the projectile and the use as a shore battery only is a better scenario.

    • @sakurasena-vj3yx
      @sakurasena-vj3yx 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ドローンなら50万円で

  • @BrianBogiaBricky
    @BrianBogiaBricky 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Railguns will be really affective at shotting at the bottom of any ship to sink it. Also, shotting were explosives and gas it located on ships and planes.

  • @user-gs9ff9hq2o
    @user-gs9ff9hq2o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    次は電子パルス爆弾の開発ですね。

  • @lil----lil
    @lil----lil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Japan was once an industrial powerhouse and is still leaders in many technological fields today - except the military. Thanks to Winnie Xitler, Japan is now manufacturing missiles for the US (that's 100% trust from the US as missile technologies are some of most sought-after and highly guarded secrets) and is well on her way to become a regional military might. Together with the US/Taiwan alliance, it will be a formidable force not even Winnie & Pootin can brush aside.

    • @hagankeys3610
      @hagankeys3610 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not really, they will never forget the Hiroshima and the Nagasaki.

  • @corujariousa
    @corujariousa 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    "After WW2, it took years for Japan to rebuild its military": True and there were accords responsible for that, like what happened to Germany.

  • @Config2025
    @Config2025 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    They're getting close to Gundam

  • @ChristopherAguilera-ez7eq
    @ChristopherAguilera-ez7eq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow... the JDF can finally take on Godzilla now.

  • @gregparrott
    @gregparrott 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    From what I last read about railguns, specifically for the DDG1000 (USS Zumwalt) destroyer, they're not going anywhere soon.
    The Zumwalt class was specifically design with technology like the railgun in mind. Yet there have been so many issues that the initial order for ~32 Zumwalt class was cut to just three, and railguns are not anticipated for ANY of them. In addition, the projectiles have an estimated cost of $100,000 EACH, and the plasma generated by the railgun itself degrades the 'barrel' far too quickly to get any decent life out of it.

    • @vxxed8668
      @vxxed8668 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      That's all due to economics of scale. If the original order for 32 did go, the ammo price would be normal.

    • @gregparrott
      @gregparrott 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vxxed8668 Saying the price would 'drop to normal' is thoroughly unsubstantiated. You should do some research before doing so. Why?........
      #1) Linear induction accelerators likely require extraordinarily precise tolerances
      #2) The high temperature plasma likely requires very specialized materials, such as a custom alloy of tungsten, inconel, invar, etc. to reduce melting, expansion, etc.
      #3) The projectile is surrounded by a sabot to guide the projectile before it's discarded. It too will be of a specialized construction.

    • @user-pe4bv7vm2y
      @user-pe4bv7vm2y 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think it's because that ship is ugly AF.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      - missiles hypersonic were just superior in range and everything else
      - normal guns are still very powerful especially given smart shells
      Railguns just simply didn't deliver enough value but there wasn't issue with technology like Japan has shown.
      They may have niche roles still like counter hypersonic defense

    • @joshuabradshaw6355
      @joshuabradshaw6355 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes but producing for 3 as opposed to the original 32, that's 1 order of magnitude. Everything you said is correct, but seems you're both on slightly different pages. @@gregparrott

  • @user-iw2sz6hr8l
    @user-iw2sz6hr8l 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    全て¥です。
    PAC3、2には限りがある。
    少ない予算でそれらを揃えるには莫大な軍事予算が掛かるから仕方ないのです……💧

  • @excalibruh1380
    @excalibruh1380 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    preparing for the 2nd impact boys

  • @EternalSeas
    @EternalSeas 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    5:32
    MyAnimeList:
    "Toaru Kagaku no Railgun" - Misaka, Mikoto

    • @ResidualSelfImage
      @ResidualSelfImage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The anime ... A Certain Scientific Railgun .. reviews the pros and cons of railgun technology where a hypothetical human railgun Misaka fights opponents with her railgun skillsets

  • @user-lv1lr8lh9b
    @user-lv1lr8lh9b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    この射程の短い兵器は迎撃用です。なので攻撃をする為に射程を伸ばす必要はありません。必要なのは精度と瞬間的な速さだけです。防衛構想の一つの手段であり特に驚く事はないです。攻撃を仕掛けない限り恐れる事もありません(o^^o)

    • @GhostLGNDClashRoyale
      @GhostLGNDClashRoyale 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What you have to fear is when Japan builds Giants Robots and genetically create Godzilla

  • @AutoReport1
    @AutoReport1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Every super dimensional fortress needs at least one.

  • @curtisbryce5096
    @curtisbryce5096 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They need to charge the projectile for it to move through the rails without wearing them down.

  • @edenshorthousesthouse1925
    @edenshorthousesthouse1925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also a concealed way of using the railgun is to not use a blast and fling Ice within rubber

  • @paratracker
    @paratracker 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You don't get a flat trajectory based on the the type of 'propellant'. High velocity and low ballistic coefficient flatten trajectories, period.

  • @ZeroDarkness-
    @ZeroDarkness- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    They gonna install it on their Gundam
    Just like Freedom Xilphias rail cannon 😂

    • @user-px2cp5xr8n
      @user-px2cp5xr8n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      横浜の ガンダム に?

  • @Bennet2391
    @Bennet2391 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As long as the rail ablation problem isn't solved, railguns are useless.

  • @jwmjtwp
    @jwmjtwp 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    いつかガンダムOOクアンタなみの性能持ったやつを作って欲しい。

  • @taketakegogo4904
    @taketakegogo4904 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    日本にはゴジラがくるからなあ…対策しておかないと

  • @BTSloan70
    @BTSloan70 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought there were major problems with railguns where their barrels get quickly worn out. Have they solved that problem?

  • @thewatersavior
    @thewatersavior 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Are mirrored drones a thing yet?

    • @justyuyun1557
      @justyuyun1557 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like make all the part surface chrome ?

    • @user-ql9jw3pl9h
      @user-ql9jw3pl9h 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@justyuyun1557 I saw a car just like that, full chrome. I guess it's not expensive and can be done by governments. But it would make aircraft more susceptible to radar

  • @user-iv8pg9py4c
    @user-iv8pg9py4c 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    機体が耐えられるか疑問だが、衛星をロケットで飛ばすより、レールガンで衛星を飛ばしたら?費用対効果的にはどちらが安上がりだろうか?

  • @bitrage.
    @bitrage. 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was almost positive that for military applications they used a mixture of chemical lasers

  • @AdamMeaney-zs6zw
    @AdamMeaney-zs6zw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Utilize Multiple barrels to alternate firing, yay!

  • @clementgoetke2385
    @clementgoetke2385 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    these videos are several years old

  • @ResidualSelfImage
    @ResidualSelfImage 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Railguns and Laser defensive weapons in Japan.

  • @King_Flippy_Nips
    @King_Flippy_Nips 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    8:26 Now they just need to invent a portable nuclear reactor small enough to be able to provide the incredible amount of electricity it requires for each shot not to mention the barrel tends to warp and has to be replaced about every 3 shots.

  • @EddyKorgo
    @EddyKorgo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    4:47 oh yeah

  • @711jastin
    @711jastin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    just build massive ships that can fire 100 missiles at once, how well would railgun battleships compete against them?

  • @edenshorthousesthouse1925
    @edenshorthousesthouse1925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Also nuclear blast are like vampires they are best defeated by wooden spears arrows the composition of the wood can be separated by the blast basically cutting through it at multiple points it's like horizontal and then vertical precision

    • @edenshorthousesthouse1925
      @edenshorthousesthouse1925 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Toothpaste is a rather effective way to make a smoke grenades as well I find

  • @w4shep
    @w4shep 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    LEGO®️ Technic has out done itself.

  • @andrewday3206
    @andrewday3206 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aircraft carriers have the ability to power railguns. And to think a bit more submarines also are nuclear so they could power them too. NAMMO ramjet powered artillery would give traditional guns the range of railguns.

  • @potatoes8414
    @potatoes8414 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You could hook up railgun to nuclear reactor i dunno if it would work but hey you never know

  • @APPSC-1234
    @APPSC-1234 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jai railgun 👌 jai jai japan👌👍

  • @WilliamMcDougald-pm3fq
    @WilliamMcDougald-pm3fq 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Obviously it's for Godzilla, Mothra, Rodan, etc.

  • @mattypants
    @mattypants 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The US gave up on railgun tech and focused more on directed energy weapons. Rail guns are kind of neat.

  • @user-nu4rq9nx9d
    @user-nu4rq9nx9d 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    こんなに大きいレールガン見ると、エヴァンゲリオンを彷彿とさせる
    使徒対策の様だ!

  • @jamesdavid311
    @jamesdavid311 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could rail guns be used in place of smaller land-based 155 mm artillery?

    • @jimbotron70
      @jimbotron70 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      There are still many technological hurdles to overcome: miniaturisation, power consumption, railgun wear.

  • @sbseisuke
    @sbseisuke 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    🎌自衛隊🎌

  • @eduardobaldig3238
    @eduardobaldig3238 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ESTOY TOTALMENTE DE ACUERDO QUE JAPÓN SE ARME MUY BIEN 👍

  • @SharhbiniRauf
    @SharhbiniRauf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Internal combustion chamber in automotive are gun chamber.

  • @dohminkonoha3200
    @dohminkonoha3200 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ballistic missile suddenly becomes obsolete and useless ?
    Impossible.
    It sounds like SF.

  • @user-ov6fv3qr2n
    @user-ov6fv3qr2n 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HUMIDITY WILL AFFECT THE PERFORMANCE

  • @SharhbiniRauf
    @SharhbiniRauf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gasoline linear free piston gun are future

  • @vietamericanfortrump
    @vietamericanfortrump 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    🇺🇸❤️🇯🇵🙏💪

  • @eduardodeno4893
    @eduardodeno4893 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Emp amo would be a game changer

  • @Specialistfirstclass
    @Specialistfirstclass 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    FF7 Junon Canon?

  • @TauvicRitter
    @TauvicRitter 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Love this Minecraft contraption

    • @Tokmurok
      @Tokmurok 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Redstone arrow accelerator lol

  • @SirPano85
    @SirPano85 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't care about the reason, I'm here to see that fcking cannon!

  • @TelpPov
    @TelpPov 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's for the Gundam

  • @quocminhduong6888
    @quocminhduong6888 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nhật bản nên tự đứng trên chính đôi chân của mình.

  • @AdamMeaney-zs6zw
    @AdamMeaney-zs6zw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are there any fully automatic rail guns?

    • @joseywales8257
      @joseywales8257 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes and have been for yrs, designed for shooting ( objects ) in space, not on Earth.

    • @AdamMeaney-zs6zw
      @AdamMeaney-zs6zw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Space based, fully automatic rail guns? Intelligence will increase!

  • @user-ie1ds2io3z
    @user-ie1ds2io3z 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    China's electromagnetic railgun has long reached a kinetic energy of 64 megajoules and a range of more than 350 kilometers. The projectile Japan tested this time was only 320 grams, and its kinetic energy was only 5 megajoules.

  • @kyleeames8229
    @kyleeames8229 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    11:23 “You may fire when ready.”
    Tarkin, you have no authority whatsoever in the US military. Okay, seriously though writing that on the turret of a war ship is a real cartoon villain move.

  • @stopterrorism_now
    @stopterrorism_now หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dont forget that Japan is one of the powerful country durimg WW2. They even engage war with US back in the days.
    Japan is technically advance when it comes on technology and its application on military.

  • @naomeleveaseriobrnaomeleve6439
    @naomeleveaseriobrnaomeleve6439 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Russians and Chinese ask to announce when it is done in order to get the blue prints. Thank you!

  • @markissboi3583
    @markissboi3583 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    IDK about rail guns but a lad built a laser gun in usa that starts fires 100 yards away Imagine trying to sneak up on him Bzzz your burnt head with no eyes @@
    if local youtubers can build this sort stuff AT home why own a gun ? so quite no one hears you start the neighbors BBQ 5 houses away :)

  • @craigbellofatto5808
    @craigbellofatto5808 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We understandably see the railgun in many defensive strategies. However... This should be immediately attached to their ongoing Gundam project.

  • @dutchuncle3310
    @dutchuncle3310 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The USA doesn’t have one of the largest and well funded Defense forces in the world. It is the largest and most well funded in the world in fact in the history of the world. By a huge margin.

  • @jobgeniston9330
    @jobgeniston9330 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Japan already have Voltes 5 😂

  • @takeruka9429
    @takeruka9429 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Only my railgun

  • @DamBevers
    @DamBevers 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Weren’t the Zumwalt ships already retired because they couldn’t be made sea worthy? A poster child to the incredible inefficiencies the U.S. Navy creates.

  • @michaelmajid5142
    @michaelmajid5142 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is the danger word on the laser written in english

  • @edwhatshisname3562
    @edwhatshisname3562 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think I built one of these out of Legos once.

  • @chingada9690
    @chingada9690 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Because they had some leftover legos...

  • @hibco3000
    @hibco3000 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I fucking love japan... ❤

  • @woutb.5210
    @woutb.5210 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    railguns have a special problem: because of the high speed of the "bullet" in the barrel is "destoyed" after a few shots. Untill that problem is not resolved, the railgun is out there useless.

  • @GreenInvasion
    @GreenInvasion 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Is not a "scary reason".... is China and N Korea

  • @TheronSax
    @TheronSax 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kaiju!

  • @philstacy
    @philstacy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is an unanswered question.

  • @robroy6804
    @robroy6804 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    looks like a lego gun

  • @rakisyc
    @rakisyc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next is mecha godzilla

  • @markphillips7538
    @markphillips7538 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Someone needs to change the hinky generic "this is serious" music

  • @user-zn5qd5el3x
    @user-zn5qd5el3x 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Думаю 100мв лазер в перспективе можно научить сбивать артиллерийские снаряды, и тогда против такой армии ни одна не устоит

  • @CitiesTurnedToDust
    @CitiesTurnedToDust 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    😅I thought this must be from 4 or 5 years ago but it was put out 11 days ago. Zumwalt destroyers are a dead program and so is the US Navy rail gun program for now.