The Bomb That Ended a War

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2022
  • This bomb may have single handedly ended the Gulf War, but the speed at which it was designed, developed and deployed, is #NotWhatYouThink #NWYT #longs
    Music:
    More Danger - WENDEL SCHERER
    Dark Energy - CRAFT CASE
    In the Wake - CRAFT CASE
    Double Crossed - CRAFT CASE
    Realm of Mind - WENDEL SCHERER
    Dark Mountains - WENDEL SCHERER
    No Backup - WENDEL SCHERER
    Inverted - HAMPUS NAESELIUS
    Solidify - CRAFT CASE
    Footage:
    US Department of Defense
    Note: "The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."

ความคิดเห็น • 6K

  • @marcusmoonstein242
    @marcusmoonstein242 ปีที่แล้ว +9817

    Fun fact: I read about this bomb in the 1990's. It's code name amongst the armorers who fitted them to the drop aircraft was "Deep Throat".

    • @Tegawe
      @Tegawe ปีที่แล้ว +897

      Sounds about right

    • @fewetoo4962
      @fewetoo4962 ปีที่แล้ว +611

      Fun fact:
      Armoror = Navy
      Weapons = Air Force

    • @larry-333
      @larry-333 ปีที่แล้ว +339

      Kinda sus innit bruv

    • @AVI-lh6rm
      @AVI-lh6rm ปีที่แล้ว +275

      i thought Deep Throat was the guy who exposed the watergate scandal

    • @DOI_ARTS
      @DOI_ARTS ปีที่แล้ว +243

      I swear the engineers have been watching too much porn

  • @Ossimsauce86
    @Ossimsauce86 ปีที่แล้ว +15493

    There's something ironic about a barrel becoming a bullet.

    • @wancelemuel6633
      @wancelemuel6633 ปีที่แล้ว +496

      Cave Johnson here!

    • @user-eq9xs5fz9u
      @user-eq9xs5fz9u ปีที่แล้ว +1093

      "Bullet used to go through me. Now, I AM THE BULLET"
      -Barrel

    • @laksamanasuhendra5868
      @laksamanasuhendra5868 ปีที่แล้ว +962

      When you're out of ammo, you become the ammo

    • @arandomcommenter412
      @arandomcommenter412 ปีที่แล้ว +192

      I have yet to meet one that can outsmart boolet

    • @RealGodfromheaven
      @RealGodfromheaven ปีที่แล้ว +124

      @@laksamanasuhendra5868 that has to be one of the coolest quotes I’ve ever heard

  • @noneyabuiznezz
    @noneyabuiznezz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +123

    I was a CNC machinist for 35 years in a factory that made large parts similar to these and this video really triggered some major nostalgia

  • @PrussianPoe
    @PrussianPoe ปีที่แล้ว +80

    *"The Bomb That Ended a War"*
    *Japanese PTSD*

  • @Riverbed_Dreaming
    @Riverbed_Dreaming ปีที่แล้ว +2734

    I hope the engineer who realised you can use gun barrels for this got a massive bonus. It’s genius. Heavy but not wide, very strong and shock resistant, and with a hole in the middle for explosives.

    • @Barmaley80x
      @Barmaley80x ปีที่แล้ว +24

      This is just barrel, maked from special steel using long base lathe. With the same approach, they can make catapult which can fired the Moon. No need Appolon, no need Saturn rocket. But this guys frozen in desire. Main problem, that Moon not have such cheap oil in Moon's arounds. Cheap oil is good catalyst for amour-propre.

    • @Philly_Willy
      @Philly_Willy ปีที่แล้ว +55

      @@Barmaley80x The Saturn rocket was needed, and there was a large desire to rush as fast as we could to get to the moon. It's called the Cold War.

    • @Barmaley80x
      @Barmaley80x ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@Philly_Willy but now in present time it useless. But someone tell us what mankind is evolving. Mankind not have ambitious plans. So we are moving to the nature, close to the monkeykind.

    • @Philly_Willy
      @Philly_Willy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Barmaley80x We are getting better at ambitious plans, but value human safety and life more now. We learn from the past. Plus, there ARE ambitious programs like SpaceX's starship rocket which will send humans to the moon and farther by landing like a person bellyflopping into a pool.

    • @pyrope5454
      @pyrope5454 ปีที่แล้ว +73

      @@Barmaley80x Can you speakadah Engrish?

  • @chilling_at_pontiff
    @chilling_at_pontiff ปีที่แล้ว +2918

    Imagine chilling 50+ feet underground in a secure sight miles from any combat and all of a sudden a metal telephone pole goes through three floors to your room.

    • @blur3253
      @blur3253 ปีที่แล้ว +323

      it explodes when it reaches the bunker too, so you catch a glimpse of the pole and then you're in heaven

    • @Erafune
      @Erafune ปีที่แล้ว +80

      Question is:
      Won't it just go through the entire bunker and 15 feet into the lowest floor before exploding!? xD
      I mean considering the speed that thing is traveling, you have a 0.001 second window where the shell is traveling "through" the bunker before burying itself yet again.

    • @chilling_at_pontiff
      @chilling_at_pontiff ปีที่แล้ว

      @@blur3253 you mean with your 72 virgins or whatever they believe is heaven?

    • @chilling_at_pontiff
      @chilling_at_pontiff ปีที่แล้ว +128

      @@Erafune if it happens to land on the bottom floor. I thought their illusion of security falling apart in such a fashion was dark but comical. Specifically if it landed on their floor and they happened to be on the bottom.
      You are right though. These missiles are so over engineered they do most likely over shoot a lot of bunkers and just kill with sealed concussion in the bunker.
      I know the MOAB a few years back landed on the surface and it killed everyone in the tunnels because it sucked out all the air.

    • @chriscolabella880
      @chriscolabella880 ปีที่แล้ว +92

      @@Erafune Good point, but remember there's a quarter tonne of explosive to figure in, even if this doesn't detonate in the exact optimal spot, all that energy has to go somewhere, as does the kinetic energy

  • @stillededge
    @stillededge ปีที่แล้ว +349

    I knew about using the barrels for this, but I didn't know how "improvised" it was. "Hold my beer..." 🤣

    • @livingcorpse5664
      @livingcorpse5664 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They really just winging it. They speedrun making and deploying new bomb.

  • @thomaswalsh4552
    @thomaswalsh4552 ปีที่แล้ว +134

    Nuclear bombs hold the record for minimal number of test drops prior to deployment. There was a single test drop, Trinity, before the two bombs dropped on Japan, which should at least tie it with this bomb. However, not only were nukes employed first, but they were arguably all different weapons at that point: the reason one was called “little boy” and the other “fat man” was because one was rather large and oval while the other was smaller and cylindrical; they were two different types of bomb.

    • @miguellopez3392
      @miguellopez3392 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      ya but then you have to argue about the development period and the previous prior detonations of a prototype core.

    • @internetuser4210
      @internetuser4210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      The point could be made that nuclear energy was studied a lot before hand, these guys machined a howitzer for half a month, and then sent it on its way

    • @djsnowman06
      @djsnowman06 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Trinity wasn't a drop tho. It was detonated on a tower in the desert.

    • @dannydevito5729
      @dannydevito5729 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm just a regular dumbass but I thought that 1=1

    • @thomaswalsh4552
      @thomaswalsh4552 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@dannydevito5729 1=1, but one apple doesn’t equal one orange

  • @captain_commenter8796
    @captain_commenter8796 ปีที่แล้ว +4755

    It’s amazing and also concerning that people can work together extremely well to create ingenious solutions to kill each other

    • @taktuscat4250
      @taktuscat4250 ปีที่แล้ว +88

      It's not always the case, they just got lucky from their quick and janky creation

    • @algirdasnausedas324
      @algirdasnausedas324 ปีที่แล้ว +141

      Skill and ability to cooperate isn't luck alone

    • @Kytes93
      @Kytes93 ปีที่แล้ว +35

      Because it's fun!

    • @markzaikov456
      @markzaikov456 ปีที่แล้ว +76

      **To penetrate thick walls
      AND to potentially kill another human

    • @dave_h_8742
      @dave_h_8742 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Works on saving lives too but they don't make TH-cam about growing antibiotic strains or operations, engineering is covered though so what's ya point !

  • @robison87
    @robison87 ปีที่แล้ว +3882

    It amazes me to see a missile go through reinforced concrete and still maintain its shape.

    • @kyleheins
      @kyleheins ปีที่แล้ว +532

      these weapons are why we dn't bother armoring ships anymore...

    • @magicamika
      @magicamika ปีที่แล้ว +137

      It is a huge concrete nail, scaled to stab smash the bunker.

    • @mungo7136
      @mungo7136 ปีที่แล้ว +34

      @@kyleheins Really?
      You have no antiship missiles that come even close to power of the WW2 AP grenades. They have neither weight nor speed. Besides, ships were not armored with stupid reinforced concrete, they were protected with armored layout specifically designed to defeat powerful AP projectiles.
      You do not armor ships because you simply do not have money to do so.

    • @kyleheins
      @kyleheins ปีที่แล้ว +249

      @@mungo7136 Go study armor and armor penetration properly. I'll wait.

    • @mungo7136
      @mungo7136 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@kyleheins Well, as you have clearly no clue, educate yourself in the first place

  • @sdunn0417
    @sdunn0417 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The ammount of CNC footage and also public info in this video is insane..

    • @Qdawg1413
      @Qdawg1413 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      You think those desert rats had TH-cam? 😂

  • @aonforme3455
    @aonforme3455 ปีที่แล้ว +108

    I remember hearing about this while fighting in the Gulf War. Not saying it won the war but was definitely a turning point. This boosted our moral tremendously.

    • @salvadorvizcarra769
      @salvadorvizcarra769 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      After the First World War, the UK, France and the US decided to take the territory of Kwait from Iraq. With this ABUSE, Iraq was left without access to the sea. And, what were the UK, US and France doing in the Middle East? They were stealing the Oil. Yup... Modern Pirates!

  • @firebeardlongfellow5295
    @firebeardlongfellow5295 ปีที่แล้ว +5073

    This is why engineers can literally connect the dots out of thin air to retrofit something for a given task.
    I mean who else thinks "well we need an extremely dense and stable shell casing for this bomb to penetrate straight into solid earth, and we need it yesterday..... what about artillery gun barrels?"
    *Begins to furiously make phone calls and order ungodly amounts of mountain dew*

    • @user-sg9ql8nk1u
      @user-sg9ql8nk1u ปีที่แล้ว +252

      *hell that literally how my dad does his shit*

    • @Cobra-King3
      @Cobra-King3 ปีที่แล้ว +146

      Life of an Engineer at it's finest

    • @targetaps
      @targetaps ปีที่แล้ว +240

      You have to also give credit to the machinist involved. Often times the machinist will work side by side with the engineers as a sort of checks and balances with empasis on checks. Lol.
      Source: I come from a family of machinist and engineers that worked in the aerospace industry.

    • @PC-xj4wi
      @PC-xj4wi ปีที่แล้ว +11

      What's with the mountain dew part?

    • @webtoedman
      @webtoedman ปีที่แล้ว +81

      @@PC-xj4wi Caffeine, caffeine, and more caffeine, to stay alert while designing the bomb.

  • @theduke7539
    @theduke7539 ปีที่แล้ว +3148

    Desert Storm was a perfect example of when you go into a conflict with the determination to actually win it. While I am critical of US foreign policy, the wars in the middle east in particular. I still have to stand in aw at that majesty that is operation desert storm, from the degree of industrial and military commitment, to swift execution, to the almost orchestral direction in the mosaic warfare strategy used. There will never be another conflict where so much goes the way it was planned and turns out so effective

    • @flightmaster999
      @flightmaster999 ปีที่แล้ว +291

      And that was well before everyone had access to computers to simplify everyone's work, amazing how they must have "known their sh*t" back then.

    • @Ukraineaissance2014
      @Ukraineaissance2014 ปีที่แล้ว +337

      The coalition actually had clear and achievable objectives in that war for once, although they should have either supported the uprisings against Saddam at the end of the war or done their best to stop them. Nobody has clear political goals in war anymore, which is like page 1 clausewitzian how to win at war stuff. Who the hell knows what russia's war objectives are right now for example? They certainly don't seem to know themselves.

    • @najunisa9375
      @najunisa9375 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Wat about Ukraine....?

    • @bas8792
      @bas8792 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Ukraineaissance2014 large chunk of Ukrainian economy is generated by the fertile and resource rich eastern ukraine. Denazifying or whatever bullshit they said is just propaganda to justify their action and to paint them as the 'hero' to russian citizen. Everyone should know that in the end, it's always the same imperialistic objective to either gain more resource or to preserve dominance.

    • @Gabriel-yd4bq
      @Gabriel-yd4bq ปีที่แล้ว

      @@najunisa9375 Ukraine looks like a badly organized shit fest. Russians were and are underperforming against what once were their own weapons (Now with support from the west it no longer stands true).

  • @troyboody9985
    @troyboody9985 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Essentially, it is a giant nail with a warhead.

  • @Bhatt_Hole
    @Bhatt_Hole ปีที่แล้ว +9

    4:27 That's some next-level hair!

  • @JeremyFieldingSr
    @JeremyFieldingSr ปีที่แล้ว +887

    To design, build and deploy a custom weapon in four weeks is freaking insane! This is a great example of how just about any engineering problem can be solved when the team feels urgency, has motivation, and an unlimited budget. LOL. This was not cheap! Great video.

    • @montylc2001
      @montylc2001 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      The P-51 went from beginning on the drawing board to a flying prototype in 3 months. And this was in 1940!!! Ya, it can be done.

    • @clonescope2433
      @clonescope2433 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @monty crawford one thing the P51 had was an economy and industry gearing up for a war, you noticed throughout World War II a lot of vehicles and Technologies were developed fairly rapidly compared to what would have happened without the war.

    • @montylc2001
      @montylc2001 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@clonescope2433 Plus they didn't have all the regulations we have to put up with today.

    • @NeverSnows
      @NeverSnows ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Also shows one of my favorite principles: simple solutions are often better. Using an "off the shelf" gun barrel was a brilliant idea.

    • @JesusProtects
      @JesusProtects ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Urgency to kill. They will have to explain themselves before God... Before being thrown into the pit.

  • @nade5557
    @nade5557 ปีที่แล้ว +1362

    minor correction, it has been done before. During WW2 the tallboy bomb was able to penetrate 16 feet of concrete or 60 feet of ground and explode within a bunker. It was actually designed to cause a massive shockwave and crater around a bunker to destroy it rather than directly exploding it. It was used from 1944 onwards on over 30 missions until the war ended

    • @nade5557
      @nade5557 ปีที่แล้ว +24

      maybe thats a new video idea

    • @webtoedman
      @webtoedman ปีที่แล้ว +170

      "Grand slam" was an even bigger version. It reached supersonic speeds purely by gravity and clean aerodynamic shape.

    • @bigmock141
      @bigmock141 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@seththomas3418 well they realize how thick that concrete is

    • @barneysdad9193
      @barneysdad9193 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      @@seththomas3418 It did sufficient damage that the pens were abandoned.

    • @sthenzel
      @sthenzel ปีที่แล้ว +54

      Apart from Tallboy and Grand slam, another one did also penetrate reasonably well.
      The Fritz X was designed to penetrate well-armoured decks, in case of the Littorio the first hit went through the ships stern, the second hit managed to detonate a magazine.
      After a resdesign it fell a little slower so the risk of detonation benath the target was reduced, but the operational success was limited, as the bomber had to fly straight and level for the guidance operator to radio-direct the bomb to the target.
      Technically it was just like the GBU-28, a guided penetrator bomb.

  • @iamcarbonandotherbits.8039
    @iamcarbonandotherbits.8039 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well put together video on something that was needed today and was delivered yesterday.

  • @billdurham8477
    @billdurham8477 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Best part about this channel is the story is told with just enough specs to tell the story instead of the a i channels with endless decimal places and useless info. Thanks!!!!! PS if you find your self driving by Watervilet, look for the Iowa class 16 inch barrel out front.

  • @Fotoschiki
    @Fotoschiki ปีที่แล้ว +1439

    Targeting military facilities and personell has proved to be long term effective.
    Targeting civilian population has proven to highly increase the enemy's determination and tenacity in combat.
    Targeting the generals and dictator of an invading country has proven hyper successfull. It's easy for dictators to send men to die at their command, while hiding in a bunker. But when they are the target, they smash the surrender button ASAP.
    It's the same now as it was with the ten plagues in egypt in the old testament. The pharao didn't budge until it hit him personally, no matter how much his people suffered. It seems to be a very old concept.

    • @CallsignYukiMizuki
      @CallsignYukiMizuki ปีที่แล้ว +88

      The "hiding" in the bunker part is technically true, but it's either losing your entire military's leadership from decapitation strikes or surrender to prevent your military from going in disarray. There's a point to be made about the top sending others to die and that kind of shit, but at the same time, you literally cannot have every single general in the frontline

    • @leonox7313
      @leonox7313 ปีที่แล้ว

      Which is why I am surprised that there have been no violent attacks in Russia targeted to people in governmental positions in light of the Ukrainian war

    • @RolandoP
      @RolandoP ปีที่แล้ว +74

      Pooting probably hiding 1km underground under his desk.

    • @Fotoschiki
      @Fotoschiki ปีที่แล้ว +41

      @@leonox7313 Well Ukrain doesn't have the military capability to launch an attack on Putin and if there is one thing the russian army absolutely sucks at it's reconnaisance. They probably have absolutely no idea where Selenski or his generals are.
      Also Ukrain's anti air units are too good to risk sending one of the few higher gen jets for such an air strike. It was the same for NATO in jugoslavia. They couldn't fly below 8 kilometers.

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh wow thanks for stating the obvious lmfao

  • @jeffb8562
    @jeffb8562 ปีที่แล้ว +338

    I’m not sure what’s more impressive, it’s ability to go so far down, or that it was built and designed in four weeks.

    • @14hereigo
      @14hereigo ปีที่แล้ว +18

      War is a great motivator

    • @spacejaime
      @spacejaime 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      American ingenuity at its best. 👍👍

    • @vond5829
      @vond5829 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@spacejaime
      Education system? Nah, no no no
      Health care system? Lmao wut?
      Military system? yes yes yes

    • @jaimeballester840
      @jaimeballester840 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@vond5829 - I hear you loud and clear vond!!! I totally agree with you. Immoraly expensive higher education (colleges), and the most expensive health system on the planet.

    • @thecursed01
      @thecursed01 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jaimeballester840 we germans have the most expensive health system. but are like...i think rank 40 something? it's terrible. lost my career becasue all i needed was a simple prescription for a learning problem (ads related) 1 year 3 months not being able to get an appointment at an psychiatrist. swiss system is much better. also expensive, but it works.

  • @Black_Kakari
    @Black_Kakari 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's incredible. Well done. Amazing

  • @jasonperez418
    @jasonperez418 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I remember this bomb i did a current event report on it when i was in 4th grade.. and that was like 23 yrs ago. But i remember it being called Bunker Buster

  • @aldreenbautista2375
    @aldreenbautista2375 ปีที่แล้ว +244

    We had gone so far with military technology; from launching projectiles using artillery to launching the artillery itself!

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Dropping it not launching lol.

    • @jondoe292
      @jondoe292 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Laser guiding it

    • @panther7584
      @panther7584 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Years later, they will drop an artillery barrel which would fire a round at intended target. Or paradrop a remote controlled machinegun to rain straight down while maintaining a small figure, hard to detect thousands of meters above.

    • @Maddinhpws
      @Maddinhpws ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@panther7584 Like that one gun in "Enter the Gungeon" that shoots a bullet that explodes into guns that shoot with bullets?

    • @panther7584
      @panther7584 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Maddinhpws That is the most silly thing I have ever heard of and I want it. In Borderlands 3, you shoot with a gun, throw it at a ground then it activate its legs and walks around shooting. Fucking adorable little gun.

  • @jp-um2fr
    @jp-um2fr ปีที่แล้ว +463

    I had the honour to meet Barnes Wallace the designer of the Grand Slam 10 ton and Tallboy 6 ton bombs as well as the bouncing bombs made for the German dams. There were over a hundred engineering students at his lecture and he shook hands afterwards with all of us. When Grand Slam was used on the Tirpitz part of a turret was found 3 miles away. He did say one thing I remember ' War should never be glorified - it's evil'. He must be turning in his grave.

    • @darreng745
      @darreng745 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Paul Brickhill in his book makes mention that Barnes - Wallis was close to tears when he was told how many aircrew has been lost on Operation Chastise so that really does not surprise me, but the Americans love to glorify their technical achievements as it covers for their military ineptitiude in other areas.

    • @mandi8345
      @mandi8345 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      War is hell. Do avoid them at all costs.
      But necessity is the mother of invention, and humans can invent one mother of a thing if the situation necessitates. The key is to not be the thing necessity is aimed at.

    • @12309.
      @12309. ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only Tallboy bombs 10,000lb were used against the Tirpitz. It was enough.

    • @MrEtienne6657
      @MrEtienne6657 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      It's not war that's glorified here, it's engeniering

    • @Ori_fr
      @Ori_fr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@darreng745 That really is the issue with the US Military... They're not well trained, nor are they really well equipped. But they have a massive Military Industrial complex behind them, that will (if needed) create this kind of stuff to fuck ur day up.

  • @garou5333
    @garou5333 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    4 WEEKS. 4 weeks is all it took for our engineers to engineer this weapon. How insane.

    • @UrsaMajorPrime
      @UrsaMajorPrime 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Imagine being there (I was) when this happened. We're gonna drop a what? Never heard of that.

    • @Soniti1324
      @Soniti1324 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      4 weeks is nothing for the military industrial complex when given the comparatively unlimited funding and access that the first open armed conflict since Korea brings with it.

    • @professorfinesser4322
      @professorfinesser4322 หลายเดือนก่อน

      we are so lost now. i wonder if we could improvise like this anymore

  • @commentfailedtopost
    @commentfailedtopost 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    New weapons don't usually end wars, they start new ones.

  • @Alex-hm7nt
    @Alex-hm7nt ปีที่แล้ว +652

    I tell people all the time, the military is hugely efficient and inefficient at the same time. When something needs (or "needs") to be done, itll get done lol

    • @vitsadelhole
      @vitsadelhole ปีที่แล้ว +30

      Well its just efficient at the task necessary in the case of developing this bomb it was the most efficient way to destroy a bunker, in case of developing the F35 it was the most efficient way to sell forgein policy and domestic corruption

    • @jayes8712
      @jayes8712 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Depends entirely on how much funds need to be burnt through, since military projects are not allowed to come in under budget.

    • @J93AD
      @J93AD ปีที่แล้ว +13

      When I was in basic I was like “damn the army is like the most organized disorganized thing ever”

    • @alesh2275
      @alesh2275 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sounds like it’s not the military’s problem but whether the civilian leadership has enough clarity in their aims and prioritization.

    • @granatmof
      @granatmof ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's huge "hurry up and wait".

  • @marjanperveinis8355
    @marjanperveinis8355 ปีที่แล้ว +427

    American weapons manufacturers: "How deep you want that this bomb penetrate?"
    US military: YES

    • @larry-333
      @larry-333 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ok, I have a bomb that can penetrate quite a bit while being able to release the payload....oh wait wrong subject?....

    • @monke6915
      @monke6915 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fr

    • @Tom_Quixote
      @Tom_Quixote ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Is this joke still considered funny?

    • @ilikewaffles3689
      @ilikewaffles3689 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Tom_Quixote apparently, judging by the ratio

    • @planespottinganimalshistory
      @planespottinganimalshistory ปีที่แล้ว +4

      *YES*

  • @darylefleming1191
    @darylefleming1191 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I was station at Eglin AFB at that time. It feels good to those long days made a big difference. I was watching the video to if they got the facts correct. To my surprise they were correct on everything.

  • @stevekelley7596
    @stevekelley7596 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When we work together focused on a goal it’s amazing what Americans can do. Together key word here.

  • @delord1619
    @delord1619 ปีที่แล้ว +463

    One of the couses i took in college was taught by a metallurgist at the Watervliet Arsenal and it was his job to supervise the heat treatment progam for the bomb casing. The biggest asset of the arsonal was the six jaw rotary forge that was key to the rough shaping of the nosecone mounting surfaces.
    His was one of the most challenging classes I ever took.

    • @AlexanderSuraphel
      @AlexanderSuraphel ปีที่แล้ว +6

      What was the challenging aspect of the class?

    • @fed3734
      @fed3734 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      What were some cool details if you dont mind me asking

    • @stevebean1234
      @stevebean1234 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      they also make the M777 barrels at the Watervliet Aresenal, which is the oldest still-operating arsenal in the US. i grew up right near by in Menands, went to school through grade 12 right nearby, and passed it a couple of times every week going to fencing class.

    • @kevin_1979
      @kevin_1979 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Was it Dr. Thorton?

    • @timfagan816
      @timfagan816 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@AlexanderSuraphel trying to spell course obviously!

  • @PBMS123
    @PBMS123 ปีที่แล้ว +426

    Some fun facts, this bomb was launched upwards, the pilots would flick the nose of the aircraft up, and the fire control computer would launch it, giving it a little extra kinetic energy.
    As the explosive was molten when poured in, the F111s took off with bombs that were still warm to the touch.

    • @tasmanmcmillan1777
      @tasmanmcmillan1777 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      The f-111's are now a lost treasure.

    • @austonboston4361
      @austonboston4361 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fun fun fun! Let's kill some people. Sheesh. Gimme a break.

    • @vipe650r
      @vipe650r ปีที่แล้ว +3

      That’s so cool!

    • @OxBlitzkriegxO
      @OxBlitzkriegxO ปีที่แล้ว

      fUn FaCt: tritonal is often in liquid form due to heat when the bombs sit outside in sun. when you move them, you can hear the explosive slosh around.

    • @blank1778
      @blank1778 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Why don’t we use them anymoren

  • @hobogrifter
    @hobogrifter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    At about 0:42 you could see the map in which it shows the Sheikh Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah Causeway, the map is showing the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 when the causeway started construction in 2013.

  • @scottscott6794
    @scottscott6794 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic video really enjoyed watching it thank you.

  • @walterwhite7640
    @walterwhite7640 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    After I saw the title i honestly thought you were talking about atomic bombs.

    • @NotWhatYouThink
      @NotWhatYouThink  ปีที่แล้ว +65

      It's Not What You Think!

    • @RealGodfromheaven
      @RealGodfromheaven ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@NotWhatYouThink “yeah, it’s big brain time”

  • @jakevote8978
    @jakevote8978 ปีที่แล้ว +148

    as a machinist i can tell you. The machinists knew exactly what size to make it. The engineers just hadn’t proven it to themselves yet 😂

    • @scotthubbard8779
      @scotthubbard8779 ปีที่แล้ว

      Too right they wouldn't have done this without knowing exactly what it was going to be able to do

    • @TravisMcGee151
      @TravisMcGee151 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@scotthubbard8779I love this stuff. Imagine the destructive weapons we have today in 2023? Love it!!

    • @Darksouls98
      @Darksouls98 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TravisMcGee151There is nothing to love about weapons that kill people. Sure it may look cool and have a big bang but ultimately it's something made to cause harm.

    • @That_Big_British_Lad
      @That_Big_British_Lad 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Darksouls98the point is to cause harm, otherwise harm more harm would be called

    • @RubbinRobbin
      @RubbinRobbin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They had to test it

  • @wjgolden0830
    @wjgolden0830 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You name-dropped my hometown (Watervliet, NY... go, Cannoneers!)!

  • @adamjindrisek585
    @adamjindrisek585 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine the person getting the idea to use the howitzer barrels technically ended a war

  • @grndiesel
    @grndiesel ปีที่แล้ว +119

    No doubt much of the ideas needed to build the bomb already existed in the minds of various engineers, machinists and technicians long before the need was officially recognized. It's really amazing what can happen when a motivated team is given the space and resources to achieve a common goal. Rare, but amazing.

    • @XMysticHerox
      @XMysticHerox ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Bunker busters were not a new concept. Just not something that was needed since the Korean war.

    • @askewcat3209
      @askewcat3209 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@XMysticHerox hes saying that even though there wasnt a present need beforehand for a new bunker buster the engineers never stopped designing just incase a better bunker buster was needed

  • @anto.rubcic
    @anto.rubcic ปีที่แล้ว +194

    Great content as always, hope u make longer videos in the future.

  • @getinthespace7715
    @getinthespace7715 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I always wondered how those bunker busters were made and how they withstood such force of impact.
    The made them out of friggin howitzer barrels. 😂 Makes total sense. Genius.

  • @ryangrogan6839
    @ryangrogan6839 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I wonder how they knew how to fuse the explosives properly. They must have known the approximate depth, or some sort of system that counts how many floors it busted through. Very impressive when you take this into account.

    • @DavidOfWhitehills
      @DavidOfWhitehills 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      When the deceleration stops .

    • @somewhatblankpaper1423
      @somewhatblankpaper1423 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Doesn’t necessarily work as the deceleration could get to 0 after penetrating below the bunker, and the explosion doesn’t do the intended damage.
      But knowing the max depth of the missile after hitting the underground bunker and the min depth of penetration underground, it’s feasible to increase the explosive power so that it deals the intended damage anywhere within the range.
      Also, maybe the bomb doesn’t aways work as intended either and multiple drops were needed.

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Literally just math. Time delay based on X000psi concrete and the expected impact velocity and penetration/deceleration.
      There are more modern solutions now though such as the FMU-167 Void Sensing Fuze.

  • @V8AmericanMuscleCar
    @V8AmericanMuscleCar ปีที่แล้ว +189

    A family friend (a professional welder) worked in Iraq in the late 80's on these bunkers. I remember him saying that those bunkers were very strong, several meters of concrete and a lot of steel, but this rocket went into that bunker like in a marmalade.

    • @jbbeiser983
      @jbbeiser983 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      And killed 480 civilians

    • @alperakyuz9702
      @alperakyuz9702 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jbbeiser983 it was al amirriyah shelter attack, it didnt use 5000lb bunker busters but 2 2000lb paveways from f117 nighthawks.

    • @artkl494
      @artkl494 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@jbbeiser983 no you got it wrong,480 units of biowaste terminated,that's how you spell it

    • @jabibiszum6764
      @jabibiszum6764 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@artkl494 Correctly spelled is toxic biowaste includes you

    • @artkl494
      @artkl494 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jabibiszum6764 biowaste unit got mad💀

  • @drekson23
    @drekson23 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    I am proud as a machinist and welder. We can do almost everything. Not just war equipment but for everyday industrial machines.

  • @kingjaffe321
    @kingjaffe321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Salute to the machinists I’ve seen them at work in their perspective fields it a very fascinating job.

  • @lordsangone
    @lordsangone 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Human ingenuity is simply amazing. If there is a will, there is a way.

  • @jessgatt2306
    @jessgatt2306 ปีที่แล้ว +246

    During WW2 the Germans fielded a cannon displacing 800mm, yeah, 800mm, and it fired seven ton point three tonne armor piercing shell. The used it on the ammo magazine at Sevastopol, in the Crimea. That shell penetrated some forty feet of steel re-enforced concrete. There's old tech for you, the gun weighed 1,20o tonnes.

    • @metermatch
      @metermatch ปีที่แล้ว +27

      Gustav gun I think it was called.

    • @vincea1830
      @vincea1830 ปีที่แล้ว +47

      Yep, every shot destroyed the barrel. Highly ineffective due to inability to keep up continuous fire + lack of accuracy...

    • @hphp31416
      @hphp31416 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@metermatchit was Dora, 4 track rail gun

    • @zanger4002
      @zanger4002 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      There's that, the German railway gun. And there's also the giant mortar they built (technically an SPG) which used a 2,170 kg shell called the Karl-Gerat.

    • @zanger4002
      @zanger4002 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@hphp31416 Dora was the name of one specific gun produced. The Gustav gun is the name of the design itself.

  • @imghoti
    @imghoti ปีที่แล้ว +61

    Amazing engineering/manufacturing. Even more amazing video! Thanks.

    • @Andre-river
      @Andre-river ปีที่แล้ว

      Come on don't be naive.ex Yugoslavian engineers made this bunkers and high ex military officers sold the position of bunkers as how they were made...lehen ex Yugoslavia collapse. I think it was in newspapers .2 million dollars for info about one bunker!

  • @metatechhd
    @metatechhd ปีที่แล้ว +6

    the engineer who came up with the idea of using gun barrels as bombs during World War II deserves a huge bonus. It was an ingenious solution to a difficult problem. The gun barrels were heavy but not wide, making them ideal for creating a powerful explosive device. Additionally, they were strong and shock-resistant, able to withstand the force of the blast. The fact that they already had a hole in the middle made it even easier to add the explosive material. Watching the story of "The Bomb That Ended a War" and learning about this engineering feat was truly fascinating. It's amazing to think how one idea like this could have such a huge impact on the course of history.

  • @bobjohnson3940
    @bobjohnson3940 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Being any one of the people hanging out in your bunker as that showed up would seriously ruin my day

  • @ChrisV267
    @ChrisV267 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    My mom grew up in Watervliet, and I have been past this armory dozens of times. Truly awesome to learn some history about it, especially when I wasn't expecting it. A true, "No way" moment for me

    • @ajflufenheimer6779
      @ajflufenheimer6779 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I live in the same area. And never knew this happend there. Also always admire the artillery you can see from the road

  • @robertlaw4073
    @robertlaw4073 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Such an amazing story. As a HS student I recall touring the Watervelite facility around 1993 with my science class. The emphasis was on how they were making composite firing tubes with spun composite materials. This was after the Clinton defense cuts. No mention was made at all about their ability to turn howitzer barrels into bombs. I suppose with that war over, the capacity to perform such a task became superfluous to replacing expert machinists with automated machinery capable of spinning together a tube.

  • @JDogVids
    @JDogVids 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That's funny I was actually about to look this video up coming from dark tech and it automatically played this 😂

  • @dontask8979
    @dontask8979 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Makes you wonder how deep the original size and weight would have gone.

  • @TheLiasas
    @TheLiasas ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Man, waking up to have a new video of yours for our delight while I take lunch before going to work is what makes for my best days nowadays! Keep up your awesomeness :)

  • @johnturnbull7798
    @johnturnbull7798 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    As mentioned by others, deep penetration bombs are not new. Both Tallboy and Grand Slam were designed specifically for this task. In WW2 smart bombs were something for the future so both were free fall supersonic missiles. When Barnes Wallis first came up with the idea of an earthquake bomb and its size the concept was that it would be dropped from 35,000 feet but at the time no plane carry the weight or get up to that altitude. Eventually the Lancaster was developed to be capable of carrying the weight but could only lift it to 21,000 feet

    • @aaroncabatingan5238
      @aaroncabatingan5238 ปีที่แล้ว

      @CAPTAIN SHARKHORSE :) You wanna bet that the US actually built and tested one recently?

  • @bobthingama5090
    @bobthingama5090 ปีที่แล้ว

    3rd time watching this, one of my favourite videos!

  • @ronrospo9016
    @ronrospo9016 ปีที่แล้ว

    I worked on the bunker buster as an assembler lots of pressure to get it done proud that it worked.

  • @zacharyohare6029
    @zacharyohare6029 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    having walked through some of these burned out bunkers personally... dam impressive. must have been wild to be on the receiving side after hearing what happened

  • @EverythingYouNeedToKnowEYN2K
    @EverythingYouNeedToKnowEYN2K ปีที่แล้ว +27

    20 years ago I remember reading an article showing that smooth bullet head missiles have further penetration than pointy missile heads. The article stated the pressure wave ahead created by the smooth missile done much of the 'digging.

    • @iambeloved496
      @iambeloved496 ปีที่แล้ว

      Wow that's interesting I never thought about that. Thanks for sharing

    • @Chris-jw8vm
      @Chris-jw8vm ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Might also be that the pointed missiles have more surface area to create friction.

  • @jonathanfairchild
    @jonathanfairchild หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s kind of crazy that our most impressive feats of ingenuity and collaboration are in weapons of war. Doesn’t detract from the sheer impressiveness just makes it a bit sobering.

  • @RuiPlaneSpotter
    @RuiPlaneSpotter 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice my friend!

  • @TheMightyStrike
    @TheMightyStrike ปีที่แล้ว +271

    Great video! Except, the ‘Little Boy’ bomb, dropped on Hiroshima, remains the only bomb to have never been tested before combat use. Scientists were so confident in its design, combined with the lack of enriched U-235 at the time, that the US military decided not to test it beforehand. The worlds second nuclear explosion and the first use of this weapon.

    • @bryannonya9769
      @bryannonya9769 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      No bomb was ever tested before it was used. Your half as smart as you think you are.

    • @hans2339
      @hans2339 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      They didn't need to. Criticality tests proved that bringing 2 fissile masses together at sufficient speed would have a nuclear yield.

    • @kingfisher366
      @kingfisher366 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      The had many times tested nuclear reaction before hand. Not that they assembled a bomb thinking that it will work.

    • @MrHubert1710
      @MrHubert1710 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@aaronwestley3239 well both yes and no. For fissile material to become supercritical it is literally "bring enough of it close together and it will go off" i.e. "Demon Core" accident. Making bomb of it was as simple as slapping uranium and highly compressing it with regular explosives. Well details are complicated but idea is simple: make boom for big boom to be possible.

    • @Shaker626
      @Shaker626 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The implosion design used in fat man and all modern nuclear weapons was, however, a very difficult concept for the brains at Manhattan. It had to be tested at Trinity, and led to the development of many physics discoveries and computational methods. Good thing for them that plutonium was easier to extract from a reactor than it was to enrich uranium to weapons grade.

  • @alexeiutgoff7955
    @alexeiutgoff7955 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "The super penetrator"
    Ah, so that's why this showed up in my recommended. Makes sense.

  • @txrick4879
    @txrick4879 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A Full metal bomb . Kind of a full metal jacket bullet bullet or FMJ . Now it's a FMB .

  • @Silo-Ren
    @Silo-Ren ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is one of my favorite videos when it comes to ingenuity. 🇺🇸

  • @Snrby
    @Snrby ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for including metric units in your video so the majority of the world outside the USA, Myanmar and Lima can understand the measurements of weight and depth.

  • @luasmartinez1262
    @luasmartinez1262 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I just want to say that this weapon was developed in the mid to late 80's. My dad helped build the casings for these weapons.

    • @kosakata8632
      @kosakata8632 ปีที่แล้ว

      What you proud of? US war investment what make US economy backward and got mountain of debt. Your generation whose must pay for the stupidity of your father's generation.
      You can imagine if US use the money for developing bullet train, high tech infrastructures, nano chips or flying car? how modern US today?

    • @rickyfitness252
      @rickyfitness252 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your dad help kill children. Then you have a bloodline of evil

  • @33sixpack
    @33sixpack ปีที่แล้ว

    That was a very interesting little tidbit to say the least. Wow!.... just wow!

  • @avishekgadal7170
    @avishekgadal7170 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Alien; what do human do on earth?
    Someone; they either fight war or for rest of the time they prepare for war.

  • @Labont
    @Labont ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Top Gun maverick be like when the bomb passes trough 1.09873 cm gap in a vent

  • @morpheusbutasasquirtle4431
    @morpheusbutasasquirtle4431 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I live a good dozens of miles from Eglin AFB and occasionally you can hear the booms of them testing their prototypes.
    But the best memory was when i was in middle school and they tested a bomb that rattled the windows of the school, which is even further away.
    Ended up with an intercom announcement that we're all fine no need to worry.
    Floridians sure do have a way with high explosives.

  • @brandonjohnson8880
    @brandonjohnson8880 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very cool to be on the team that helped develop this monster.

    • @Loquacious_Jackson
      @Loquacious_Jackson ปีที่แล้ว

      We never went to the moon, stop believing the lies

    • @kataisaki505
      @kataisaki505 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Loquacious_Jackson what's going to the Moon has anything to do with this?

  • @matthew_mayton
    @matthew_mayton ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so cool it’s like ‘How It’s Made’

  • @travis7099
    @travis7099 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Definitely my favorite video from your channel 👍🏻
    Keep up the great work man!

  • @matthewrossilini5808
    @matthewrossilini5808 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    As a machinist/programmer, its awesome seeing the manufacturing footage. Nice work digging that up!

  • @ionhunter
    @ionhunter 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It was a janitor that suggested using a cannon barrel.

  • @jamesg2382
    @jamesg2382 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man that is pretty awesome. Great story

  • @voss1617
    @voss1617 ปีที่แล้ว +82

    Did the bomb continue to be used or developed after it’s initial use or was it just a one off design?

    • @NotWhatYouThink
      @NotWhatYouThink  ปีที่แล้ว +82

      They continued making GBU-28 bombs (not from Howitzer barrels), and of course, other bunker buster bombs were developed after.

    • @DtWolfwood
      @DtWolfwood ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Aren't the current bunker busters also fitted for thermobarics?

    • @K20_EM1
      @K20_EM1 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Bro ever hear of desert storm?Thst was just the test range… They make these fucking rain on assholes, they work great on caves as well.

    • @fewetoo4962
      @fewetoo4962 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@DtWolfwood Thermobarics (FAE), like other blast boms, use thin cases to increase the ratio of explosive weight. Penetrators use thick walled cases to improve penetration and increase density to improve kenetic penetration.

    • @thegeneralist7527
      @thegeneralist7527 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I'm pretty sure if Uncle Sam knows where you are he can reach out and touch you whenever he wants.

  • @theinterfaithshepherd9075
    @theinterfaithshepherd9075 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video! I'm surprised you could get so much footage of the bombs!
    I knew some guys who worked on that project.

  • @danieln6700
    @danieln6700 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting. Had no idea they used those barrels to help make them.

  • @envitech02
    @envitech02 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    1:08 Strike Packages?? What a nice way to put it. I believe it was originally labelled as Gift Packages. Then somebody thought the better of it.

  • @suspectsn0thing
    @suspectsn0thing ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Sick that there's so much footage of this process available
    This is pretty much my worst nightmare as a machinist lmao

  • @windriver2363
    @windriver2363 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I love how simple it is. No tricks, just a big hunk of steel dropped from really high up.

  • @Penguin-1966
    @Penguin-1966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Scary how something that is larger than the bullet it shoots, becomes the projectile itself, massive power difference

  • @aldrinmilespartosa1578
    @aldrinmilespartosa1578 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Next would be bunker busters made from an iowa gun barrel.

  • @jamezbrian4135
    @jamezbrian4135 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I am a Desert Storm Vet (USMC) and this is the first time I read about this. We did not have the internet or cell phones. We got what the command told us and that was it. Some folks listened to that Radio Europe thing but even then most of that news was not about us. I also thought all of the USA supported us. I learned after we got back that many did not support the war. I did get to use the AT & T phone station, in the desert, once. We got 5 minutes and that was it.

    • @daddyrabbit835
      @daddyrabbit835 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Fuck yeah. I remember the phone calls. We moved back into Kuwait after the "100-hour War". I was with the 3rd Armored Div. We engaged the Republican Guard units that were in Iraq serving as a theater reserve for the Iraqi troops in Kuwait. Anyway, I can't remember if the calls were free or if I had to use my phone card. Those were some pretty sweet phone calls.

    • @jkfdsjlkdvccx
      @jkfdsjlkdvccx ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I can't speak for everyone, but the press coverage was universally positive in support of the war. CNN made it's debut talking about how great and justified the war was.

  • @Dingusdoofus
    @Dingusdoofus ปีที่แล้ว +121

    “This is proof that engineers are the master race and architects are inferior species” - Probably what RCE would say if he saw this video.

    • @nukeengineer5214
      @nukeengineer5214 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As a P.E. I agree

    • @1yoan3
      @1yoan3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As a French equivalent of P.E., I agree.

    • @nukeengineer5214
      @nukeengineer5214 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@airgin3000 Professional Engineer, is a license in the US which allows you to certify designs, calculations as required by law. It is mandatory for Nuclear Power Plants.

    • @realulli
      @realulli ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Engineers build weapons, architects build targets.

    • @AlexCS8
      @AlexCS8 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@realulli Isn't Architecture part of Engineering?

  • @thehapa
    @thehapa ปีที่แล้ว

    From barrel to bomb; how poetic

  • @Doug.the.welder-hj6cq
    @Doug.the.welder-hj6cq หลายเดือนก่อน

    Some of these weapons are so terrifying it's hard to believe they even exist.

  • @Akamaikai0923
    @Akamaikai0923 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I live near Eglin AFB and we feel the shockwaves from their bomb testing a lot.

  • @kevi152
    @kevi152 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    During the 2nd WW the British used Tall Boy to destroy bunkers. This penetrating bomb was placed next to the bunker from a height of 40000ft. It’s delayed charge caused massive cavitation and the heavy bunkers fell into the cavity created, hence destroying themselves. There was no need to penetrate the 30ft of reinforced concrete above the submarine bunkers.

  • @JordanBeagle
    @JordanBeagle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crazy it could penetrate over 100 ft, I can hardly even imagine that

  • @oculosprudentium8486
    @oculosprudentium8486 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    maybe by now in 2023, they have an inventory of over 1000+ of these that can take out deep bunkers 200 ft deep, and with a warhead of at least 1000 pounds of explosives

  • @chaosXP3RT
    @chaosXP3RT ปีที่แล้ว +67

    Wow, this was fascinating! It's crazy how much effort went into trying to solve an issue in such a short time frame!

    • @markingraham4892
      @markingraham4892 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a idiotic video.

    • @FharishAhmedPortfolio
      @FharishAhmedPortfolio ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LoL When there's Petroleum at stake... USA can do wonders!!! LoL

    • @stoyantodorov2133
      @stoyantodorov2133 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm honestly more amazed at the tools and methods used to make the conversion. I doubt many other countries have the means to do what is shown in the video even if they came up with the same idea and had these guns laying around.

    • @PGHammer21A
      @PGHammer21A ปีที่แล้ว

      It is another example why engineering is a necessary skill - even, if not especially, in wartime. Fun fact - did you know that the Army Engineering School STILL teaches the design and use of trebuchets and other ancient siege weapons - the ancestors of artillery? (I knew they taught it at Fort Belvoir - which was the original home of the Enginering School - they kept the course when they moved to Fort Leonard Wood.)

    • @ag3336
      @ag3336 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FharishAhmedPortfolio facts

  • @joshualamoreau1890
    @joshualamoreau1890 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I went to a Marine Corps poolee event at Watervliet, it's a pretty awesome place. The gun barrels in the picture are still there on display, so are a few armored vehicles

  • @kelrunner
    @kelrunner ปีที่แล้ว

    What a gun. Didn't know it til now but I need that for home protection. Might take a while to get set up but when I'm ready I'll be really ready...oops...

  • @sanchitvishwakarma1108
    @sanchitvishwakarma1108 ปีที่แล้ว

    Content like this is extremely rare